trans-planckian physics in laboratory black-holesreznik/saar bh analogs.pdf · trans-planckian...
TRANSCRIPT
Trans-Planckian physics in Laboratory Black-Holes
Benni Reznik Tel Aviv University
Physics Colloquium, Saarland University, July 21, 2011.
Dark stars
John Mitchell, (1783). Pierre-Simon Laplace (1796)
is light affected by gravity?
Einstein’s theory of General Relativity
Riemannian structure of space time.
Karl Schwarzschild’s solution
Singularity “hidden” by a horizon
Eienstein:….singularities do not exist in reality… “cosmic censorship”
Black-hole classical physics
Black-hole classical physics
Black-hole entropy?
Black-hole Thermodynamics
Black-hole Thermodynamics
Hawking Effect- 1 (intuitive picture)
Hawking effect -2 (Hawking’s approach)
Hawking effect -3 (without a black hole!)
Hawking effect -3
Hawking effect -3
The “trans-Planckian” puzzle
! vacuum ¼ exp(t/4M)/M
For Mbh=Msun, THawking ¼ 10-7 K After t¼1 sec → ! vacuum¼ 10 1000
while ! P lanck =(c/~)(G~/c3)-1/2¼ 10 44
Unruh, t’Hooft, Susskind, Jacobson.
The problem is that a naïve cutoff will kill the Hawking effect.
We need some sort of a non-trivial dynamical cutoff that involves new physics at the Planck scale!
Clues from Laboratory analog systems??
Can we simulate and detect the Hawking radiation ?!
Sonic fluid black-hole (“dumb-hole”)
Unruh, PRL 1981.
1D Black holes
Black hole Schwarzschild geometry.
Seen by freely falling observer.
Painleve´-Gullstrand coordinates
The observer crosses smoothly the horizon.
Curved geometry describes a fluid with a changing velocity!
But all models need to confront the short distance problem…
Cutoff in the fluid wavelength’s of inter-ion scales are excluded. But short distance physics is here well known. Can be described by modified dispersion relation:
Mode “conversion” process
Unruh, PRD 1996.
Time runs backwards!
Discrete sonic BH with trapped ions
B. Horstman, B. Reznik, S. Fagnocchi, J.I. Cirac, PRL (2010)
Ring Traps
Waki et al., Nature (1992) Microfabricated traps (Ulm)
Miniature toroidal mass spectrometers.
Propagation of phonon perturbations
Schematic depiction of the pulse propagation on an ion ring.
Discrete sonic BH with trapped ions
Phononic group velocity c(k) in the flat subsonic region as a function of k for full Coulomb interactions (blue dashed line) and nearest-neighbor interactions only (green straight line).
Ion trap Sonic horizon
t
Incoming wave
Outgoing wave
Sonic Horizon
Commoving frame
Unruh’s mechanism
“ Bloch oscillation”
Lab. frame Fluid frame (note the moving horizon)
Measurement of Hawking radiation: correlations In-out EPR pairs are generated at the horizon, in laboratory black holes they can be in principle observable! Ballbinot et. al. (2008).
Fast pairs inside bh
HR
Correlations
With long range Interactions.
Nearest-neighbor interactions
Entanglement generation by the bh
Entropy of entanglement Time evolution of Negativity
Experimental realization The emerging entanglement can be measured on two routes:
measuring the covariance matrix through a measurement of correlation in the ion displacements
Or by swapping the entanglement from the motional to the internal degrees of freedom of the ions: Retzker, J. I. Cirac , B. Reznik, PRL (2005).
The basic mechanism in all proposals involves the coupling of the ion displacements to their internal levels with lasers:
Experimental parameters
If the initial temperature is two orders of magnitude higher then Hawking temperature, cross correlations remain present and ground State cooling is not required!
Discussion There is a curious similarity between law and high energy physics structure that might be helpful when studying “high energy effects” within the laboratory low energy atomic models.
Ideas from law energy physics systems might help to shed new light on problems in other fields.
The Hawking or other gravity effects are possibly measurable/testable within the framework “laboratory” toy models.
Thank you!
ISF