trait and taxonomies
TRANSCRIPT
1© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Traits and Trait Traits and Trait TaxonomiesTaxonomies
Chapter 3Chapter 3
2© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Trait-Descriptive Trait-Descriptive AdjectivesAdjectives
Words that describe traits, Words that describe traits, attributes of a person that are attributes of a person that are characteristic of a person and characteristic of a person and perhaps enduring over timeperhaps enduring over time
3© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Three fundamental Three fundamental questions guide those who questions guide those who
study traitsstudy traits How should we conceptualize traits?How should we conceptualize traits? How can we identify which traits are How can we identify which traits are
the most important from among the the most important from among the many ways that individuals differ?many ways that individuals differ?
How can we formulate a How can we formulate a comprehensive taxonomy of traits—a comprehensive taxonomy of traits—a system that includes within it all the system that includes within it all the major traits of personality?major traits of personality?
4© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
What Is a Trait?: Two Basic What Is a Trait?: Two Basic FormulationsFormulations
Traits as Internal Causal Traits as Internal Causal Properties Properties
vs.vs.
Traits as Purely Descriptive Traits as Purely Descriptive SummariesSummaries
5© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Traits as Internal Causal Traits as Internal Causal Properties Properties
Traits are presumed to be Traits are presumed to be internal in that individuals carry internal in that individuals carry their desires, needs, and wants their desires, needs, and wants from one situation to nextfrom one situation to next
Desires and needs are presumed Desires and needs are presumed to be causal in that they explain to be causal in that they explain behavior of individuals who behavior of individuals who possess thempossess them
6© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Traits as Internal Causal Traits as Internal Causal Properties Properties
Traits can lie dormant in that Traits can lie dormant in that capacities are present even capacities are present even when behaviors are not when behaviors are not expressedexpressed
Scientific usefulness of viewing Scientific usefulness of viewing traits as causes of behavior lies traits as causes of behavior lies in ruling out other causesin ruling out other causes
7© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Traits as Purely Descriptive Traits as Purely Descriptive SummariesSummaries
Traits as descriptive summaries of Traits as descriptive summaries of attributes of a person; no assumption attributes of a person; no assumption about internality, nor is causality about internality, nor is causality assumedassumed
Argue that we must first identify and Argue that we must first identify and describe important individual describe important individual differences and subsequently develop differences and subsequently develop casual theories to explain themcasual theories to explain them
8© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Act Frequency The Act Frequency Formulation of Traits: An Formulation of Traits: An
Illustration of the Illustration of the Descriptive Summary Descriptive Summary
FoundationFoundation Starts with the notion that traits Starts with the notion that traits
are categories of actsare categories of acts
9© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Act Frequency Research Act Frequency Research ProgramProgram
Act nominations: Designed to identify Act nominations: Designed to identify which acts belong in which trait which acts belong in which trait categoriescategories
Prototypicality judgements: Involves Prototypicality judgements: Involves identifying which acts are most central identifying which acts are most central or prototypical of each trait categoryor prototypical of each trait category
Monitoring act performance: Securing Monitoring act performance: Securing information on actual performance of information on actual performance of individuals in their daily livesindividuals in their daily lives
10© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Critique of Act Frequency Critique of Act Frequency FormulationFormulation
Does not specify how much context Does not specify how much context should be included in the description should be included in the description of the trait-relevant actof the trait-relevant act
Seems applicable to overt actions, Seems applicable to overt actions, but what about failures to act or but what about failures to act or covert acts not directly observable?covert acts not directly observable?
11© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Critique of Act Frequency Critique of Act Frequency FormulationFormulation
May not successfully capture May not successfully capture complex traitscomplex traits
Atheoretical—nothing within Atheoretical—nothing within approach provides guide to which approach provides guide to which traits are important or explanation traits are important or explanation for why individuals differ in for why individuals differ in frequency of act performance over frequency of act performance over timetime
12© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Accomplishments of Act Accomplishments of Act Frequency FormulationFrequency Formulation
Helpful in making explicit the Helpful in making explicit the behavioral phenomena to which most behavioral phenomena to which most trait terms refertrait terms refer
Helpful in identifying behavioral Helpful in identifying behavioral regularitiesregularities
Helpful in exploring the meaning of Helpful in exploring the meaning of some traits that are difficult to study, some traits that are difficult to study, such as impulsivity and creativitysuch as impulsivity and creativity
13© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Identification of the Most Identification of the Most Important Traits: Three Important Traits: Three
ApproachesApproaches
Lexical ApproachLexical Approach Statistical ApproachStatistical Approach Theoretical ApproachTheoretical Approach
14© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Lexical ApproachLexical Approach
Starts with lexical hypothesis: All Starts with lexical hypothesis: All important individual differences important individual differences have become encoded within the have become encoded within the natural language over timenatural language over time
Trait terms are important for Trait terms are important for people in communicating with people in communicating with othersothers
15© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Lexical ApproachLexical Approach
Two criteria for identifying Two criteria for identifying important traitsimportant traitsSynonym frequencySynonym frequencyCross-cultural universalityCross-cultural universality
16© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Lexical ApproachLexical Approach
Problems and limitationsProblems and limitations Many traits are ambiguous, Many traits are ambiguous,
metaphorical, obscure, or difficultmetaphorical, obscure, or difficult Personality is conveyed through Personality is conveyed through
different parts of speech (not just different parts of speech (not just adjectives), including nouns and adjectives), including nouns and adverbsadverbs
17© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Lexical ApproachLexical Approach
Lexical approach is a good Lexical approach is a good starting point for identifying starting point for identifying important an individual important an individual difference, but should not be the difference, but should not be the exclusive approach usedexclusive approach used
18© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Statistical ApproachStatistical Approach
Starts with a large, diverse pool of Starts with a large, diverse pool of personality itemspersonality items
Most researchers using lexical Most researchers using lexical approach turn to statistical approach approach turn to statistical approach to distill ratings of trait adjectives to distill ratings of trait adjectives into basic categories of traitsinto basic categories of traits
Goal of statistical approach is to Goal of statistical approach is to identify major dimensions of identify major dimensions of personalitypersonality
19© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Statistical ApproachStatistical Approach
Factor analysisFactor analysis Identifies groups of items that Identifies groups of items that
covary or go together, but tend not covary or go together, but tend not to covary with other groups of itemsto covary with other groups of items
Provides means for determining Provides means for determining which personality variables share which personality variables share some property or belong within the some property or belong within the same groupsame group
20© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Statistical ApproachStatistical Approach
Factor analysisFactor analysis Useful in reducing the large array of Useful in reducing the large array of
diverse traits into smaller, more diverse traits into smaller, more useful set of underlying factorsuseful set of underlying factors
Factor loading: Index of how much Factor loading: Index of how much of a variation in an item is of a variation in an item is “explained” by a factor“explained” by a factor
21© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Statistical ApproachStatistical Approach
Factor analysisFactor analysis
Cautionary note: You only get out of Cautionary note: You only get out of factor analysis what you put in; thus, factor analysis what you put in; thus, researchers must pay attention to researchers must pay attention to the initial selection itemsthe initial selection items
22© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Theoretical ApproachTheoretical Approach
Starts with a theory, which then Starts with a theory, which then determines which variables are determines which variables are importantimportant
Example: Sociosexual orientation Example: Sociosexual orientation (Simpson & Gangestad, 1991)(Simpson & Gangestad, 1991)
Strengths coincide with strengths of Strengths coincide with strengths of a theory, and weaknesses coincide a theory, and weaknesses coincide with the weaknesses of a theorywith the weaknesses of a theory
23© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Evaluating the Approaches Evaluating the Approaches for Identifying Important for Identifying Important
TraitsTraits In practice, many personality researchers In practice, many personality researchers
use a combination of three approachesuse a combination of three approaches Norman (1963) and Goldberg (1990) Norman (1963) and Goldberg (1990)
started with the lexical strategy to started with the lexical strategy to identify the first set of variables for identify the first set of variables for inclusioninclusion
Then used factor analysis to reduce the Then used factor analysis to reduce the set to a more manageable number (five)set to a more manageable number (five)
24© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Evaluating the Approaches Evaluating the Approaches for Identifying Important for Identifying Important
TraitsTraits This strategy solves two problems This strategy solves two problems
central to the science of central to the science of personality:personality: Problem of identifying key domains of Problem of identifying key domains of
individual differencesindividual differences Problem of describing order or Problem of describing order or
structure that exists among individual structure that exists among individual differences identifieddifferences identified
25© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Taxonomies of Taxonomies of PersonalityPersonality
Eysenck’s Hierarchical Model of Eysenck’s Hierarchical Model of Personality Personality
Cattell’s Taxonomy: The 16 Cattell’s Taxonomy: The 16 Personality Factor SystemPersonality Factor System
Circumplex Taxonomies of Circumplex Taxonomies of Personality: The Wiggins Personality: The Wiggins Circumplex (1979)Circumplex (1979)
Five-Factor Model Five-Factor Model
26© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Eysenck’s Hierarchical Eysenck’s Hierarchical Model of PersonalityModel of Personality
Model of personality based on traits Model of personality based on traits that Eysenck believed were highly that Eysenck believed were highly heritable and had heritable and had psychophysiological foundationpsychophysiological foundation
Three traits met criteria: Three traits met criteria: Extraversion-Introversion (E), Extraversion-Introversion (E), Neuroticism-Emotional Stability (N), Neuroticism-Emotional Stability (N), Psychoticism (P)Psychoticism (P)
27© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Eysenck’s Hierarchical Eysenck’s Hierarchical Model of PersonalityModel of Personality
ExtraversionExtraversion: High scorers like : High scorers like partiers, have many friends, require partiers, have many friends, require people around to talk to, like playing people around to talk to, like playing practical jokes on others, display practical jokes on others, display carefree, easy manner, and have a carefree, easy manner, and have a high activity levelhigh activity level
28© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Eysenck’s Hierarchical Eysenck’s Hierarchical Model of PersonalityModel of Personality
NeuroticismNeuroticism: High scorers are : High scorers are worriers, anxious, depressed, have worriers, anxious, depressed, have trouble sleeping, experience array of trouble sleeping, experience array of psychosomatic symptoms, and over-psychosomatic symptoms, and over-reactivity of negative emotionsreactivity of negative emotions
29© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Eysenck’s Hierarchical Eysenck’s Hierarchical Model of PersonalityModel of Personality
PsychoticismPsychoticism: High scorers are : High scorers are solitary, lack empathy, often cruel solitary, lack empathy, often cruel and inhumane, insensitivity to pain and inhumane, insensitivity to pain and suffering of others, aggressive, and suffering of others, aggressive, penchant for strange and unusual, penchant for strange and unusual, impulsive, and has antisocial impulsive, and has antisocial tendenciestendencies
30© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Eysenck’s Hierarchical Eysenck’s Hierarchical Model of PersonalityModel of Personality
Hierarchical Structure of Hierarchical Structure of Eysenck’s SystemEysenck’s System
Super traits (P, E, N) at the topSuper traits (P, E, N) at the top Narrower traits at the second levelNarrower traits at the second level Subsumed by each narrower trait Subsumed by each narrower trait
is the third level—habitual actsis the third level—habitual acts
31© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Eysenck’s Hierarchical Eysenck’s Hierarchical Model of PersonalityModel of Personality
Hierarchical Structure of Hierarchical Structure of Eysenck’s SystemEysenck’s System
At the lowest level of the four-At the lowest level of the four-tiered hierarchy are specific actstiered hierarchy are specific acts
Hierarchy has the advantage of Hierarchy has the advantage of locating each specific, personality-locating each specific, personality-relevant act within increasingly relevant act within increasingly precise nested systemprecise nested system
32© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Eysenck’s Hierarchical Eysenck’s Hierarchical Model of PersonalityModel of Personality
Biological Underpinnings—Key Biological Underpinnings—Key Criteria for “Basic” Dimensions Criteria for “Basic” Dimensions
of Personalityof Personality Heritability: P, E, and N have Heritability: P, E, and N have
moderate heritabilities, but so do moderate heritabilities, but so do many other personality traitsmany other personality traits
Identifiable physiological substrateIdentifiable physiological substrate
33© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Eysenck’s Hierarchical Eysenck’s Hierarchical Model of PersonalityModel of Personality
Biological Underpinnings—Biological Underpinnings—LimitationsLimitations
Many other personality traits show Many other personality traits show moderate heritabilitymoderate heritability
Eysenck may have missed Eysenck may have missed important traitsimportant traits
34© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Cattell’s Taxonomy: The 16 Cattell’s Taxonomy: The 16 Personality Factor SystemPersonality Factor System
Cattell’s goal was to identify and Cattell’s goal was to identify and measure the basic units of measure the basic units of personalitypersonality
Believed that the true factors of Believed that the true factors of personality should be found across personality should be found across different types of data, such as different types of data, such as self-reports and laboratory testsself-reports and laboratory tests
35© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Cattell’s Taxonomy: The 16 Cattell’s Taxonomy: The 16 Personality Factor SystemPersonality Factor System
Identified 16 factorsIdentified 16 factors Major criticismsMajor criticisms
Some personality researchers have Some personality researchers have failed to replicate the 16 factorsfailed to replicate the 16 factors
Many argue that a smaller number of Many argue that a smaller number of factors captures important ways in factors captures important ways in which individuals differwhich individuals differ
36© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Wiggins CircumplexThe Wiggins Circumplex
Wiggins (1979) developed Wiggins (1979) developed measurement scales to assess traitsmeasurement scales to assess traits
Started with the lexical assumptionStarted with the lexical assumption Argued that trait terms specify Argued that trait terms specify
different kinds of ways in which different kinds of ways in which individuals differ: individuals differ: Interpersonal, Interpersonal, temperament, character, material, temperament, character, material, attitude, mental, and physicalattitude, mental, and physical
37© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Wiggins CircumplexThe Wiggins Circumplex
Wiggins was concerned with Wiggins was concerned with interpersonal traits and carefully interpersonal traits and carefully separated these outseparated these out
Defined “interpersonal” as interactions Defined “interpersonal” as interactions between people involving exchangesbetween people involving exchanges
Two resources that define social Two resources that define social exchange are love and statusexchange are love and status
Dimensions of status and love define Dimensions of status and love define axes of Wiggins circumplexaxes of Wiggins circumplex
38© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Wiggins CircumplexThe Wiggins Circumplex
Wiggins circumplex has three key Wiggins circumplex has three key advantagesadvantages Provides an explicit definition of what Provides an explicit definition of what
constitutes “interpersonal” behaviorconstitutes “interpersonal” behavior Specifies relationships between each Specifies relationships between each
trait and every other trait in the model trait and every other trait in the model (adjacency, bipolarity, orthogonality)(adjacency, bipolarity, orthogonality)
Alerts investigators to “gaps” in work Alerts investigators to “gaps” in work on interpersonal behavior on interpersonal behavior
39© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Wiggins CircumplexThe Wiggins Circumplex
Key limitationKey limitation: Interpersonal map is : Interpersonal map is limited to two dimensions—other limited to two dimensions—other traits may have important traits may have important interpersonal consequencesinterpersonal consequences
40© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Five-Factor ModelFive-Factor Model
Five broad factors: Surgency or Five broad factors: Surgency or Extraversion, Agreeableness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, and Openness/Intellectand Openness/Intellect
Originally based on the combination of Originally based on the combination of lexical and statistical approacheslexical and statistical approaches
Big Five taxonomy has achieved a greater Big Five taxonomy has achieved a greater degree of consensus than any other trait degree of consensus than any other trait taxonomy in the history of personality taxonomy in the history of personality trait psychologytrait psychology
41© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Five-Factor ModelFive-Factor Model
Empirical Evidence for Five-Empirical Evidence for Five-Factor ModelFactor Model
Replicable in studies using English Replicable in studies using English language trait words as itemslanguage trait words as items
Found by more than a dozen Found by more than a dozen researchers using different researchers using different samplessamples
Replicated in different languagesReplicated in different languages
42© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Five-Factor ModelFive-Factor Model
Empirical Evidence for Five-Empirical Evidence for Five-Factor ModelFactor Model
Replicated in every decade for the Replicated in every decade for the past half century, suggesting five- past half century, suggesting five- factor solution replicable over timefactor solution replicable over time
Replicated using different item Replicated using different item formatsformats
43© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Five-Factor ModelFive-Factor Model
The troublesome fifth factor: Some The troublesome fifth factor: Some disagreement remains about the disagreement remains about the content and replicability of fifth content and replicability of fifth factorfactor
Empirical correlates of the five Empirical correlates of the five factorsfactors
Personality-descriptive nounsPersonality-descriptive nouns
44© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Five-Factor ModelFive-Factor Model
Is the five-factor model Is the five-factor model comprehensive? Possible omissions comprehensive? Possible omissions include positive evaluation, negative include positive evaluation, negative evaluation, masculinity/femininity, evaluation, masculinity/femininity, religiosity or spirituality, religiosity or spirituality, attractiveness, sexualityattractiveness, sexuality
45© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Summary and EvaluationSummary and Evaluation
There are different approaches to There are different approaches to identifying the important traitsidentifying the important traits
Personality psychologists sometimes Personality psychologists sometimes blend the approaches blend the approaches
Formulating an overarching Formulating an overarching taxonomy of personality traits is taxonomy of personality traits is fundamentalfundamental