traffic counts program evaluation …apps.tindaleoliver.com/webtcdms/docs/5_tm4.pdftraffic counts...

ST. LUCIE COUNTY

TRAFFIC COUNTS PROGRAM EVALUATION

Technical Memorandum No. 4 – DEVELOPMENT OF DATA REPORTING SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AND LONG RANGE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Prepared For: St. Lucie Transportation Planning Organization

2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982

ph (772) 462-1593, fax (772)462-2549

Prepared By: Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc.

1000 Ashley Drive, Suite 100 Tampa, Florida 33602

ph (813) 224-8862, fax (813)226-2106

January 2010

Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. St. Lucie County January 2010 i Traffic Counts Program Evaluation

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section 1: INTRODUCTION.......................................................................... 1-1

Section 2: PROJECT WORKSHOPS............................................................ 2-1

Workshop Number 1..................................................................... 2-1

Workshop Number 2..................................................................... 2-2

Section 3: DATA REPORTING SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS........................ 3-1

Traffic Count Location Database Attributes .................................. 3-1

Traffic Count Data Attributes ........................................................ 3-3

Traffic Count Reporting Requirements ......................................... 3-4

Traffic Analysis Tools for Quality Control and Growth Rate Analysis

..................................................................................................... 3-5

Data Management and GIS Interface........................................... 3-6

Concurrency Needs and Traffic Data Interface Requirements ..... 3-7

User Security Considerations ....................................................... 3-8

Database Platform........................................................................ 3-8

Hardware and Software Needs .................................................... 3-9

Web Based Application Development Requirements ................... 3-9

Section 4: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN .......................................................... 4-1

Task Definition and Priority Rank ................................................. 4-1

Responsibility ............................................................................... 4-3

Schedule ...................................................................................... 4-3

Hardware costs ............................................................................ 4-4

Consultant costs........................................................................... 4-4

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 4-1 – Traffic Count Program Implementation Schedule..... 4-3

Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. St. Lucie County January 2010 ii Traffic Counts Program Evaluation

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix A. Workshop Number 1

Appendix B. Workshop Number 2

Appendix C. FDOT Conversion Factors in St Lucie County

Appendix D. Traffic Count Report Examples

Appendix E. Traffic Count Program Implementation Cost

Tindale-Oliver & Associates, Inc. St. Lucie County January 2010 1-1 Traffic Counts Program Evaluation

Section 1

INTRODUCTION

The St. Lucie Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) has requested the service of

Tindale-Oliver & Associates (TOA) to review the current traffic count practices used by

County and Cities to develop recommendations concerning how to select traffic count

locations, frequency of performing traffic counts, quality control techniques to determine

the reasonableness of the traffic count data, and the overall management of historical

traffic count data and its use in various planning and engineering processes and

studies.

This technical memorandum was prepared to document data reporting system

requirements and provide a suggested implementation plan for the recommended

Traffic Count Program. The remaining sections are summarized below.

Section 2 provides a summary to the two project workshops, including the agenda,

meeting notes and presentation for each workshop. Discussions and direction received

at these workshops provided input into the development of the Section 3, Data

Reporting System Requirements.

Section 3 documents the proposed Traffic Count Program Data Reporting System

Requirements. These requirements have been developed based on information,

findings and recommendations contained in the Technical Memorandums 1 through 3

and discussions and direction received at the two project workshops.

Section 4 provides a suggested Implementation Plan for the Traffic Counts Program.

The Implementation Plan includes program tasks, task priority, responsible party, task

schedule and estimated costs.

The Appendices contain supporting documentation as necessary for each of the above

sections.


Section 2

PROJECT WORKSHOPS

This section discusses the two TPO workshops that occurred during the evaluation of

traffic count programs of the county and cities in St. Lucie County. Workshop number

one involved the review of Technical Memorandums 1, 2 and 3. Workshop number two

focused on the information necessary for development of Technical Memorandum 4.

Each of these workshops is discussed below.

Workshop Number 1

Workshop Number 1 occurred on October 2, 2009 from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. in the

County Growth Management conference room. Staff from the TPO, county and cities

attended this workshop. The workshop agenda, meeting notes, attendees and

presentation are included in Appendix A.

The purpose of this workshop was to review the contents of Technical Memorandums 1,

2 and 3, drafts of which were provided to the workshop attendees. The topics reviewed

at the workshop are summarized below:

Overview Of Study Findings

Traffic Count Philosophy

Video Detection Capabilities

Quality Control Procedures

Annual Traffic Counts Update Process

Types Of Reporting Information

Organizational Placement Of Traffic Count Program

In-House Versus Out-Sourcing Of The Collection Of Annual Traffic Counts

Technical Memorandum Number 4 Outline

Decision Points And Next Steps

A Power Point presentation, provided to all participants, was used to guide discussions

on the above topics at the workshop.


At the end of the workshop, participants were asked the following six questions:

Do you agree with the traffic count philosophy?

Do you agree with the quality control process?

Do you agree with the reporting information?

Do you agree with the TPO role in the traffic count program?

Do you think the counts should be outsourced?

Do you agree with the Technical Memorandum #4 Outline?

Consensus agreement, as presented by the Consultant and discussed by the

participants at the workshop, was reached on all of the above questions with the

exception of the question concerning whether the collection of traffic counts should be

outsourced. During the discussions on this topic, it was indicated that the person who

was in charge of the traffic count program for the County had left the County. Further

discussions indicated that processing traffic counts would be difficult at best, and

perhaps it would make sense to outsource the collection of traffic counts at this time.

However, the issue concerning the outsourcing of traffic counts was that neither the

cities nor the county had budgeted funding available for this purpose and it was unlikely

that either could obtain funding for this purpose. It was agreed that the outsourcing of

traffic counts would be further evaluated.

Workshop Number 2

Workshop Number 2 occurred on November 20, 2009 from 2 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. in the

Board of County Commissioners conference room. Staff from the TPO, county and

cities attended this workshop. The workshop agenda, meeting notes, attendees and

presentation are included in Appendix B.

This workshop discussed data system reporting requirements and the development of a

traffic counts program implementation plan. The topics reviewed at the workshop are

summarized below:

Data Attributes, Including But Not Limited To:

o Count Stations Properties o Count Data


o Technical Attributes

Functions And Analysis Features, Including But Not Limited To:

o LOS Data Management and GIS Interface

o Add New Count Station

o Import Count Data

o Assign Count Station To Segments

o Regression Analysis

o Quality Control

Standard Reports And Queries, Including But Not Limited To:

o Count Station History Report

o Regression Analysis Report

o Count Station Location Report

o AADT or Peak Hour Volume Map

o Traffic Count Station Map

o Traffic Growth Rates Map

Implementation Matrix Considerations, Including But Not Limited To:

o System Functions

o Hardware Requirements And Costs

o Software And Consultant Costs

o Schedule And Implementation Priority

o Responsible Party For Implementation

A Power Point presentation, provided to all participants, was used to guide discussions

of the above topics at the Workshop. Additionally, the Consultant used its internally

developed software, vTIMAS (visual Transportation Inventory Management and

Analysis System), to demonstrate the traffic count program data attributes, functions

and features, and standard reports and query capabilities. A sampling of St. Lucie

County and FDOT traffic count data was used in this demonstration.

In addition to discussing the traffic counts program requirements and implementation

plan, several participants asked questions about the use of the traffic counts for

concurrency and level of service analysis and reporting. The Consultant provided a

demonstration of the vTIMAS level of service analysis and reporting functions. Topics

discussed and/or demonstrated at the workshop relative to level of service analysis and

reporting functions are summarized below:


Data Attributes, Including But Not Limited To:

o Roadway analysis facility and individual segment identification attributes o Multi-modal level of service standards o Technical analysis variables

Functions And Analysis Features, Including But Not Limited To:

o LOS Data Management and GIS Interface

o Management of Multiple Alternative Analysis Year Files

o FDOT Generalized Tables LOS

o Change Traffic Volumes and LOS Recalculation on the Fly

o Change LOS Methodology from Generalized Tables to ART-PLAN

o Review ART-PLAN LOS Variables in vTIMAS

o Comment Tracking at the Segment Level

o System-wide Level of Service Analysis for Multiple Planning Years

o Geographic Area/Corridor Level of Service Analysis

o Concurrency Analysis Using Growth Rates or Checkbook Approach

o Document Management For Traffic Impact Studies and Supporting Data,

Development Orders, and Other Related Information tied to the Project

Level

Standard Reports And Queries, Including But Not Limited To:

o Detailed System-wide Level of Service Report in FDOT Accepted Format

o Standard Detailed Level of Service Report

o System-wide Analysis Summary Report

o Measure of Effectiveness Reports

o Tier I Generalized Tables Traffic Screening Report

o Individual Project Tracking Report

o Project Impacted Segments Report

o Cumulative Traffic Impacts Report

o Number of Lanes and Road Type Map

o Level of Service Standard Map

o Level of Service Map

o Level of Congestion Map

Following conclusion of the demonstration component of the workshop, workshop

participants discussed the functions presented at this workshop The following

summarizes these discussions:


The Traffic Count Program and software discussed and demonstrated meets the

needs of the County, Cities and the TPO. The TPO requested the Consultant to

develop a scope of services to implement the Traffic Count Program and

software in the Phase II Project.

The issue of outsourcing the traffic counts was discussed. The TPO requested

the Consultant to include an option for collecting and processing the 2010 county

traffic counts as recommended in Technical Memorandum Number 2 in the

Phase II Project.

There was interest by workshop participants in considering the implementation of

the Consultant’s level of service analysis, reporting and concurrency

management software. Given this interest, the TPO requested the Consultant to

include an option for implementing this software in the Phase II Project.


Section 3

DATA REPORTING SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS

Workshop Number 2, discussed in the previous section, presented desirable data

attributes, features and functions, and reporting requirements of the proposed Traffic

Counts Program for the St. Lucie County TPO, County and Cities. This section further

discusses the data reporting system requirements that must be addressed in the

successful implementation of the Traffic Counts Program for the St. Lucie County TPO,

County and Cities. Each of the following ten sub-sections will be discussed in the

remainder of Section 3:

Traffic Count Location Database Attributes

Traffic Count Data Attributes

Traffic Count Reporting Requirements, Standard And Ad-Hoc Reporting

Traffic Analysis Tools For Quality Control And Growth Rate Analysis

Data Management And GIS Interface

Concurrency Needs And Traffic Data Interface Requirements

User Security Considerations

Database Platform

Hardware And Software Needs

Web Based Application Development Requirements

Traffic Count Location Database Attributes

The data attributes concerning the location of traffic counts need to include the

following:

Count Station Identification Number: number given to identify the count station and

whether it is a County or FDOT count station.

Facility Type: if the facility is an interstate facility or not.

County Station Type:

o Permanent: Telemetered Traffic Monitoring Stations (TTMS)

o Temporary: Portable Traffic Monitoring Stations (PTMS)


Roadway: road name on which the count station is on. For example:

On Street: Crosstown Parkway

Location: approximate location of the count station. For Example:

Location: 500 feet west of Interstate 95.

Seasonal Factor Location: this location is necessary to apply the correct season

adjustment factor to convert average daily volumes into average annual daily traffic

(AADT) volumes. St Lucie County is currently divided into four different geographic

areas:

o East: A1A to U.S.1

o Central: from west of U.S.1 to I-95

o West: west of I-95

o I-95: I-95 only

A list of the latest available Season Adjustment Factors have been included in

Appendix C.

Axle Adjustment Factor Location: this location is necessary to apply the factor that

provides the axle correction to be used for portable monitoring sites where data is

collected using “tubes”. In other words, when using “tubes”, most of the heavy

vehicles are counted as two light vehicles and therefore, corrections are necessary.

St Lucie County is currently divided into twenty one axle adjustment factor

areas/roadways:

o 9401 - County Roads (Rural)

o 9407 - S.R.70 (Okeechobee Road) from Kings Highway to I-95

o 9408 - S.R.70 (Okeechobee Road/Virginia Avenue) from I-95 to U.S.1

o 9409 - S.R.614 (Indrio Road) from Emerson Avenue to Kings Highway

o 9410 - County Roads (Urban)

o 9411 – S.R.713 (Kings Highway) from I-95 to U.S.1

o 9412 – I-95

o 9413 – S.R.713 (Kings Highway) from S.R.70 to I-95

o 9414 – S.R.614 (Indrio Road) from I-95 to Emerson Avenue

o 9415 – S.R.615 (25th Street)

o 9416 – S.R.608 (St Lucie Boulevard)

o 9417 – S.R.5 (U.S.1)

o 9418 – S.R.70 (Kings Highway) from Okeechobee County to Kings Highway

o 9420 – A1A South from Martin County Line to U.S.1

o 9421 – A1A North from U.S.1 to Indian River County Line

o 9422 – S.R.68 (Orange Avenue) from Kings Highway to Nagle Road


o 9423 – Avenue A

o 9424 – S.R.707 (Indian River Drive) from U.S.1 to Avenue A

o 9425 - S.R.716 (Port St Lucie Boulevard) from Turnpike to U.S.1

o 9427 – S.R.68 (Orange Avenue) from Angle Road to U.S.1

o 9430 – Gatlin Boulevard from I-95 to Turnpike

A list of the latest available Axle Adjustment Factors have been included in Appendix

C.

Notes: this field is used to add any additional information that the user considers

necessary regarding the particular count station.

Traffic Count Data Attributes

The necessary traffic count data attributes have been listed and described below:

Count Date: date of the traffic count.

Count Source: City, County, TPO, FDOT, etc.

SPS Source File: location where the SPS file containing the traffic count data is

stored.

Seasonal Adjustment Factor Table: source of the Seasonal Adjustment Factor.

(Based on geographic location of the count station)

Seasonal Adjustment Factor: based on the location and year of the count.

Peak Season Adjustment Factor: based on geographic location and year of the

count.

Axle Adjustment Factor Table: source of the Axle Adjustment Factor. (Based on

geographic location of the count station).

Axle Adjustment Factor: based on the geographic location and year of the count.

Once the traffic counts are processed, the following attributes need to be included as

part of the traffic count attributes:

Day 1 Information:

o Hourly Volumes

o Daily Volume

o Daily Peak Direction

o Daily Directional Factor

o Daily Heavy Vehicle Percentage (if classification count)


o AM Peak Hour Peak-to-Daily Ratio

o AM Peak Hour Time

o AM Peak Hour Volume

o AM Peak Hour Heavy Vehicle Percentage (if classification count)

o AM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor (PHF)

o AM Peak Hour Directional Factor

o AM Peak Hour Peak Direction

o AM Peak Hour Directional Volume

o PM Peak Hour Peak-to-Daily Ratio

o PM Peak Hour Time

o PM Peak Hour Volume

o PM Peak Hour Heavy Vehicle Percentage (if classification count)

o PM Peak Hour Peak Hour Factor (PHF)

o PM Peak Hour Directional Factor

o PM Peak Hour Peak Direction

o PM Peak Hour Directional Volume

Day 2 Information: similar information to the one reported for Day 1 (if available)

Day 3 Information: similar information to the one reported for Day 1 (if available)

Average Daily Traffic (ADT): obtained as the average of the daily volumes

Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT): obtained as the ADT x Seasonal Adjustment

Factor x Axle Adjustment Factor

K Factor: Peak-to-Daily Factor (AM and PM Peak Hour)

D Factor: Directional Factor (AM and PM Peak Hour)

AM Peak Hour Peak Direction

PM Peak Hour Peak Direction

Heavy Vehicle Percentage (Daily, AM Peak Hour, and PM Peak Hour) (If

Classification Count)

Daily Volume Graph

Traffic Count Reporting Requirements

Different count reports need to be generated as part of the Traffic Count Program. At a

minimum, the following reports are recommended:


Count Station Report: this report needs to show traffic volumes for the count station,

by the hour of day (hour ending) for Day1 direction, Day2 direction, and Day3

direction. The report also needs to include a Quality Control (QC) and a Traffic

check, Average Traffic Characteristics during AM and PM peak periods, and AADT.

Count Station History Report: this report needs to provide a summary of counts

including count station identification, direction, daily volumes for days 1, 2, and 3,

and ADT. The report also needs to include the Peak Hour and, Axle factor, with

corresponding AADT for multiple years.

Count Station Regression Report: this report needs to provide a regression analysis

based on the criteria specified by the user. The report will include annual growth

rates, a linear regression, and standard deviation (sigma) lines.

GIS Count Station Map: a map depicting the location of the traffic count station

GIS Traffic Data Map(s): maps depicting traffic count volumes, type of count, growth

rates and other attribute data.

Examples of reports like the ones mentioned above have been included in Appendix D.

In addition, and in order to determine the frequency and when the next traffic count is

due, the following information needs to be reported:

Volume/Service Capacity

Last Count Year: year when the last traffic count was collected

When the next traffic count is due

Update of maps developed in Technical Memorandum Number 2 relating to count

station frequency and priority.

Traffic Analysis Tools for Quality Control and Growth Rate Analysis

In order top determine if the collected count is a valid count several quality control

checks need to be performed. Below, there is a list of items that need to checked

before deciding if a collected count should be considered valid or not.

AM and PM Peak-to-Daily Ratio: the minimum peak-to-daily ratio recommended by

FDOT is 0.090 (non-freeway facilities), if a lower value is obtained, this may indicate

that the peak hour volume is metered due to oversaturated conditions. In addition, if


counts are collected along multiple days, in general a difference between days of up

to 10 percent is considered acceptable. If a higher difference is observed, further

research about field traffic conditions may be necessary as this may indicate that

abnormal conditions occurred during the days the count was taken.

AM and PM Peak Hour D Factor: the minimum D factor recommended by FDOT is

0.52, if a lower value is obtained, this may indicate that the peak hour volume is

metered due to oversaturated conditions. In addition, if counts are collected along

multiple days, in general a difference between days of up to 10 percent is

considered acceptable. If a higher difference is observed, further research about

field traffic conditions may be necessary as this may indicate that abnormal

conditions occurred during the days the count was taken.

AM and PM Peak Hour Starting Time: if counts are collected along multiple days, in

general a difference between the peak hour starting times between days of up to 30

minutes is considered reasonable. If a longer difference is observed, further

research about field traffic conditions may be necessary as this may indicate that

abnormal conditions occurred during the days the count was taken.

Historical Volume Regression: using the available historical data, the system needs

to be capable of developing a historical regression analysis.

Standard Deviation: once the historical regression analysis is developed, if any

traffic count falls outside of an acceptable range of standard deviation(s), it may

indicate that abnormal conditions occurred during the collection of the count and that

the count may needed to be removed from the analysis.

Valid Count: this feature is used when, due to any of the quality control procedures

described above, one specific count year is not considered acceptable for use. This

feature allows not including this specific count in the analysis.

Annual Growth Rate: after developing the linear regression and determining which

counts are valid and which ones are not, the system needs to be capable of

developing an annual average growth rate to be used in calculations of future traffic

volume estimates.

Data Management and GIS Interface

A GIS linkage to the traffic count database is necessary to be able to “map” the traffic

count station data attributes. This can be done by creating a unique count station

identification number (ID) for each count station. It is should be noted that this number


should not be confused with the “Count Station Number”. The “Count Station Number”

is the number of the count station established by the County or FDOT.

Once the GIS interface is created as described above, any attribute traffic count data

can be displayed for analysis and reporting purposes.

Concurrency Needs and Traffic Data Interface Requirements

As discussed during Workshop Number 2, a number of workshop participants

expressed interest in using uniform data and methodologies for level of service analysis

and reporting. A key benefit of the Traffic Count Program is that it provides the

foundation for possible integration with Level of Service Analysis and Countywide

Concurrency Data Management tools discussed and demonstrated during Workshop

Number 2. The integration of traffic counts, level of service analysis and concurrency

tools will require the following:

Development of a standardized methodology and process for the collection,

updating and production of an Annual Level of Service Report, including a set of

traffic data that is approved for use by all local governments. The Annual Report

and associated data would then be used in all developer submitted traffic impact

studies and the concurrency determination processes of the County and Cities.

Selection and uploading of approved traffic count data into level of service analysis

tools.

Establishment of a countywide Transportation Network that includes all functionally

classified state, county and city roadways that are desired to be monitored.

Establishment of a uniform set of Transportation Network data for level of service

analysis, reporting and review of traffic impact studies for concurrency determination

purposes.

Development of a Concurrency Data Management Tool that has the flexibility of

using the following approaches based on the local jurisdiction’s needs:

o Growth Rates

o Checkbook

o Some combination of the above

Development of security considerations, as discussed below, concerning the use

and availability of data to both, local governments and the private sector.


User Security Considerations

An objective of the Traffic Count Program is to provide a standardized set of data to the

users of the Program. However, different users will have different levels of access to

the Traffic Count Program as defined below:

Guest: a Guest is a user that has access to a set of approved data and can

download and generate reports if needed. However, a Guest user will not be able to

edit data maintained in the Traffic Counts Program. An example of this user would

be a local government representative or traffic consultant working for a developer

that is looking for approved traffic volume information for Transportation Network

roads.

Authorized User: in addition to the “Guest” user capabilities, an Authorized User

needs to be able to up-load counts, process traffic counts, perform quality control

checks, run reports and decide if the counts are valid or not. Pursuant to

discussions during the two project workshops, it was agreed that the St. Lucie TPO

will be the central housing agency that will keep and process all the count data.

Administrator: in addition to “Guest” and “Authorized User” user capabilities, the

Administrator will be able to make changes to database tables used by the software.

Examples would include updating new seasonal adjustment tables and changing

quality control tolerance levels. This Administrator would likely be the St. Lucie TPO

employee responsible for the management of the Traffic Count Program. The

Consultant may also have access to the Traffic Count Program as an Administrator.

Database Platform

The Traffic Count Program software uses a visual basic front end program and a

Microsoft Access database that is typically installed on a shared file server. This

combination of software provides an easy to use interface and reliable storage of traffic

count data. The Microsoft Access database would also be used for multi-modal

attribute inventory data used in level of service analysis and concurrency

determinations. The software demonstrated during the November 20, 2009 workshop

was written for Windows XP systems and has been tested using Windows Vista (and is

currently being tested using Windows 7). The software is designed to use Crystal

Reports as its reporting backend, and ESRI MapObjects as its mapping backend. Both

are distributed with the software.


Hardware and Software Needs

The minimum hardware and software needs required to support the Traffic Count

Program are identified below:

Windows XP SP 2 (and Windows Vista)

Recommended: Pentium 4 Processor or better

Recommended: 1,000 MB RAM or more

50 MB Hard Drive space for vTIMAS program files and TOA Application Update

program files

Internet connection to download periodic updates

250 MB to 1,000 MB of server space

Web Based Application Development Requirements

As indicated above, the current version of the vTIMAS traffic count software program is

based on a Visual Basic and Access Database Platform. The implementation of a web

based application for the Traffic Counts Program and GIS interface, if desired, would

need to be developed as a subsequent work effort. Below are the basic and additional

functions and features, and the hosting and infrastructure options.

Basic Functions and Features

Ability to update traffic count station histories and locations using standard exports

from the TPO’s Traffic Count Program as described earlier in this Section

GIS map environment with standard functionality (e.g. pan, zoom, identify feature,

retrieve linked file)

Dynamic labeling and visibility of geographic features (i.e. local streets/labels only

appear when zoomed in beyond a specified extent)

Display of traffic count station locations and display official approved AADT and

count history data when an individual station is selected

Ability to click-on individual count station to open pdf files of count station history

report and download files


Additional Functions and Features

Dynamic count station history reports (reports generated on the fly as a feature of

the GIS map environment rather than as a previously generated pdf created as part

of an annual update process)

Roadway Attributes

o AADTs

o Lanes, Median Type, and Functional Class

o LOS Standard/Grade

o Service Capacity

o Count Stations Assignments

o Projected Interim Year and Plan Year Volumes

o Volume Smoothing Method

Search feature (to look up count stations by name rather than finding them on the

map)

Hosting and Infrastructure

The TPO does not have a GIS web service/GIS division. The County has a GIS division

and a Map Gallery, but these are static (pdf) maps, not interactive maps. The City of

Port St. Lucie has an interactive GIS map site, but the extents of other data layers do

not appear to be countywide. For the TPO or the County to implement an interactive

GIS mapping site for traffic counts, one of the three options below would need to be

considered:

1. Invest in ESRI ArcGIS server software and support; or

2. Publish the traffic count data using Google Maps; or

3. Contract with a consultant to host and maintain an interactive TPO Traffic Count

Program website.

Generally, the first and third options could support both the minimum and optional

functionality. The second option most readily supports only the minimum requirements.

Should a web based Traffic Counts Program option be desired by the TPO, a systems

development specification should be developed as part of a subsequent work effort.


Section 4

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

The Implementation Plan includes three program areas: 1) Traffic Count Program Tool,

2) Level of Service Analysis and Reporting Tool, and 3) Concurrency Data Management

Tool. The Implementation Plan is organized into the following sub-sections:

Task Definition and Priority Rank

Responsibility for Implementation

Implementation Schedule

Hardware Costs

Consultant Costs

Each of the above sub-sections is discussed below.

Task Definition and Priority Rank

The tasks necessary to implement each of the above referenced program areas

includes the following:

1. Traffic Count Program Tool

a. Formalize a standardized methodology and process for the annual

collection and processing of traffic counts

b. Traffic Count Program Tool software modifications, testing and

acceptance review

c. Traffic Count Program Tool software installation and TPO staff training

d. Collection of 2010 traffic count data

e. Processing and quality control of 2010 Traffic counts

f. On-going Traffic Count Program Tool support services

2. Level of Service Analysis and Reporting Tool

a. Formalize a standardized methodology and process for the collection,

updating and production of an Annual Level of Service Report, including

update of data attributes

b. Level of Service Analysis and Reporting Tool software modifications,

testing and acceptance review


c. Level of Service Analysis and Reporting Tool installation and TPO staff

training

d. Perform 2010 Level of Service Analysis and Produce Annual Level of

Service Report

e. On-going Level of Service Analysis and Reporting Tool support services

3. Concurrency Data Management Tool

a. Formalize standard traffic impact study methodology and review

procedures

b. Conduct presentations to private sector traffic consultants on standard

traffic impact study methodology and review procedures; obtain comments

and adjust procedures; and obtain community buy-in and TPO Board

approval of methodology and procedures

c. Concurrency Data Management Tool software modifications, testing and

acceptance review

d. Concurrency data management software installation and TPO staff

training

e. Concurrency data management software installation and training for

county and city staffs

f. On-going concurrency data management support services

The order in which the tasks have been defined above is the priority order that needs to

be followed during the implementation of the three program areas. To summarize:

First, it is necessary to have a Traffic Count Program that reasonably reflects the

historical and current traffic volume levels on the roadway network, and project

future traffic volumes based on staff approved growth rates (Traffic Count Program

Tool);

Second, once the traffic volumes are known and future projections can be

developed, level of service analysis needs to be performed to evaluate the level of

service operating condition of the roadway network. (Level of Service Analysis and

Reporting Tool); and

Third, given the development and approval of the Annual Level of Service Report,

future development proposals can be reviewed, tracked and approved as

appropriate (Countywide Concurrency Data Management Tool).


1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter

Traffic Count Tool

Level of Service Analysis and Reporting Tool

Countywide Concurrency Data Management Tool

Year 2010 Year 2011ACTIVITY

Responsibility

The current Traffic Count Program is managed by St. Lucie County’s Public Works

Department. However, due to staff shortage issues previously discussed, the existing

program is not able to be maintained. Also, at the present time, neither the City of Port

St. Lucie nor the City of Fort Pierce has a formal Traffic Count Program in place.

Pursuant to discussions that occurred during the workshops held on October 2, 2009

and November 20, 2009, the county and the cities have indicated concurrence that the

St Lucie TPO should be the responsible agency for the Traffic Counts Program and act

as a clearing house for the collection and management of all traffic counts performed in

St. Lucie County by the cities, County, and FDOT. In addition, since the St Lucie TPO

committees include representation from both the County and the Cities, it makes logical

sense that the TPO could also be the lead agency for the development of the County-

wide Annual Level of Service Report. This would also entail the updating of level of

service data attribute data and managing the Level of Service Analysis and Reporting

Tool previously discussed.

The agency responsible for the Concurrency Data Management Tool will need to be

agreed on between the cities, county, and TPO. One of the key decisions that needs to

be determined is if the Concurrency Data Management Tool will be developed as a

web-based application or be initially deployed as a server based tool. Should a web

based option be desired by the TPO, a systems development specification should be

developed as part of a subsequent work effort.

Schedule

A preliminary implementation schedule is presented in Figure 4-1.

Figure 4-1 Traffic Count Implementation Schedule


As shown in Figure 4-1, the complete implementation of the program is estimated to be

completed over a 15 month period. This schedule will be updated based on the

approved Phase II work effort.

Hardware Costs

Based on the hardware needs described in Section 3 of this Technical Memorandum, a

standard personal computer would be adequate for support of the proposed vTIMAS

software tool. As such, existing TPO work stations could be used for the vTIMAS

software tool. If additional computers are needed, they should be purchased using the

standard county personal computer bid specification.

Consultant Costs

The cost of the implementation of the Traffic Count Program has been prepared and is

included in Appendix E. This cost is estimated at $98,816.32 and includes the following

tasks:

1. Develop and formalize a standardized methodology and process for the annual

collection and processing of traffic counts

2. Traffic Count Program Tool software modifications, testing and acceptance review

3. Traffic Count Program Tool software installation and TPO staff training

4. Collection of 2010 traffic count data

5. Processing and quality control of 2010 Traffic counts

6. On-going Traffic Count Program Tool support services

The above number ($98,816.32) includes $36,661.08 corresponding to the outsourcing

of traffic counts.

Program areas 2 (Level of Service and Reporting Tool) and 3 (Concurrency Data

Management Tool) are not included in the project costs in Appendix E. A separate

budget will be prepared for these program areas.

APPENDIX A

ST. LUCIE COUNTY


FDOT Conversion Factors in St Lucie County

1. Seasonal Conversion Factors

2. Axle Conversion Factors

2008 Peak Season Factor Category Report - Report Type: ALLCategory: 9400 EAST-A1A TO US1 MOCF: 0.86Week Dates SF PSCF================================================================================ 1 01/01/2008 - 01/05/2008 1.02 1.19 2 01/06/2008 - 01/12/2008 0.98 1.14 3 01/13/2008 - 01/19/2008 0.93 1.08* 4 01/20/2008 - 01/26/2008 0.90 1.05* 5 01/27/2008 - 02/02/2008 0.88 1.03* 6 02/03/2008 - 02/09/2008 0.86 1.00* 7 02/10/2008 - 02/16/2008 0.83 0.97* 8 02/17/2008 - 02/23/2008 0.83 0.97* 9 02/24/2008 - 03/01/2008 0.83 0.97*10 03/02/2008 - 03/08/2008 0.83 0.97*11 03/09/2008 - 03/15/2008 0.83 0.97*12 03/16/2008 - 03/22/2008 0.84 0.98*13 03/23/2008 - 03/29/2008 0.86 1.00*14 03/30/2008 - 04/05/2008 0.87 1.01*15 04/06/2008 - 04/12/2008 0.89 1.04*16 04/13/2008 - 04/19/2008 0.90 1.05 17 04/20/2008 - 04/26/2008 0.93 1.08 18 04/27/2008 - 05/03/2008 0.96 1.12 19 05/04/2008 - 05/10/2008 0.99 1.15 20 05/11/2008 - 05/17/2008 1.03 1.20 21 05/18/2008 - 05/24/2008 1.04 1.21 22 05/25/2008 - 05/31/2008 1.06 1.24 23 06/01/2008 - 06/07/2008 1.08 1.26 24 06/08/2008 - 06/14/2008 1.10 1.28 25 06/15/2008 - 06/21/2008 1.12 1.31 26 06/22/2008 - 06/28/2008 1.12 1.31 27 06/29/2008 - 07/05/2008 1.12 1.31 28 07/06/2008 - 07/12/2008 1.13 1.32 29 07/13/2008 - 07/19/2008 1.13 1.32 30 07/20/2008 - 07/26/2008 1.14 1.33 31 07/27/2008 - 08/02/2008 1.15 1.34 32 08/03/2008 - 08/09/2008 1.17 1.36 33 08/10/2008 - 08/16/2008 1.18 1.38 34 08/17/2008 - 08/23/2008 1.17 1.36 35 08/24/2008 - 08/30/2008 1.17 1.36 36 08/31/2008 - 09/06/2008 1.17 1.36 37 09/07/2008 - 09/13/2008 1.17 1.36 38 09/14/2008 - 09/20/2008 1.16 1.35 39 09/21/2008 - 09/27/2008 1.14 1.33 40 09/28/2008 - 10/04/2008 1.13 1.32 41 10/05/2008 - 10/11/2008 1.11 1.29 42 10/12/2008 - 10/18/2008 1.09 1.27 43 10/19/2008 - 10/25/2008 1.07 1.25 44 10/26/2008 - 11/01/2008 1.06 1.24 45 11/02/2008 - 11/08/2008 1.04 1.21 46 11/09/2008 - 11/15/2008 1.03 1.20 47 11/16/2008 - 11/22/2008 1.03 1.20 48 11/23/2008 - 11/29/2008 1.03 1.20 49 11/30/2008 - 12/06/2008 1.02 1.19 50 12/07/2008 - 12/13/2008 1.02 1.19 51 12/14/2008 - 12/20/2008 1.02 1.19 52 12/21/2008 - 12/27/2008 0.98 1.14 53 12/28/2008 - 12/31/2008 0.93 1.08

* Peak Season

Page 1 of 4

A1 - 1

2008 Peak Season Factor Category Report - Report Type: ALLCategory: 9401 CEN.-W OF US1 TO I95 MOCF: 0.94Week Dates SF PSCF================================================================================ 1 01/01/2008 - 01/05/2008 0.99 1.06 2 01/06/2008 - 01/12/2008 0.98 1.05 3 01/13/2008 - 01/19/2008 0.97 1.04* 4 01/20/2008 - 01/26/2008 0.96 1.03* 5 01/27/2008 - 02/02/2008 0.94 1.00* 6 02/03/2008 - 02/09/2008 0.93 0.99* 7 02/10/2008 - 02/16/2008 0.91 0.97* 8 02/17/2008 - 02/23/2008 0.92 0.98* 9 02/24/2008 - 03/01/2008 0.92 0.98*10 03/02/2008 - 03/08/2008 0.92 0.98*11 03/09/2008 - 03/15/2008 0.93 0.99*12 03/16/2008 - 03/22/2008 0.93 0.99*13 03/23/2008 - 03/29/2008 0.94 1.00*14 03/30/2008 - 04/05/2008 0.95 1.02*15 04/06/2008 - 04/12/2008 0.95 1.02*16 04/13/2008 - 04/19/2008 0.96 1.03 17 04/20/2008 - 04/26/2008 0.97 1.04 18 04/27/2008 - 05/03/2008 0.98 1.05 19 05/04/2008 - 05/10/2008 0.99 1.06 20 05/11/2008 - 05/17/2008 1.00 1.07 21 05/18/2008 - 05/24/2008 1.00 1.07 22 05/25/2008 - 05/31/2008 1.01 1.08 23 06/01/2008 - 06/07/2008 1.02 1.09 24 06/08/2008 - 06/14/2008 1.02 1.09 25 06/15/2008 - 06/21/2008 1.03 1.10 26 06/22/2008 - 06/28/2008 1.04 1.11 27 06/29/2008 - 07/05/2008 1.06 1.13 28 07/06/2008 - 07/12/2008 1.07 1.14 29 07/13/2008 - 07/19/2008 1.09 1.17 30 07/20/2008 - 07/26/2008 1.08 1.15 31 07/27/2008 - 08/02/2008 1.08 1.15 32 08/03/2008 - 08/09/2008 1.08 1.15 33 08/10/2008 - 08/16/2008 1.08 1.15 34 08/17/2008 - 08/23/2008 1.08 1.15 35 08/24/2008 - 08/30/2008 1.07 1.14 36 08/31/2008 - 09/06/2008 1.07 1.14 37 09/07/2008 - 09/13/2008 1.06 1.13 38 09/14/2008 - 09/20/2008 1.06 1.13 39 09/21/2008 - 09/27/2008 1.05 1.12 40 09/28/2008 - 10/04/2008 1.04 1.11 41 10/05/2008 - 10/11/2008 1.03 1.10 42 10/12/2008 - 10/18/2008 1.02 1.09 43 10/19/2008 - 10/25/2008 1.01 1.08 44 10/26/2008 - 11/01/2008 1.01 1.08 45 11/02/2008 - 11/08/2008 1.00 1.07 46 11/09/2008 - 11/15/2008 1.00 1.07 47 11/16/2008 - 11/22/2008 1.00 1.07 48 11/23/2008 - 11/29/2008 1.00 1.07 49 11/30/2008 - 12/06/2008 0.99 1.06 50 12/07/2008 - 12/13/2008 0.99 1.06 51 12/14/2008 - 12/20/2008 0.99 1.06 52 12/21/2008 - 12/27/2008 0.98 1.05 53 12/28/2008 - 12/31/2008 0.97 1.04

* Peak Season

Page 2 of 4

A1 - 2

2008 Peak Season Factor Category Report - Report Type: ALLCategory: 9402 WEST-W OF I95 MOCF: 0.84Week Dates SF PSCF================================================================================ 1 01/01/2008 - 01/05/2008 0.97 1.15 2 01/06/2008 - 01/12/2008 0.92 1.09* 3 01/13/2008 - 01/19/2008 0.87 1.03* 4 01/20/2008 - 01/26/2008 0.86 1.02* 5 01/27/2008 - 02/02/2008 0.84 0.99* 6 02/03/2008 - 02/09/2008 0.82 0.97* 7 02/10/2008 - 02/16/2008 0.81 0.96* 8 02/17/2008 - 02/23/2008 0.81 0.96* 9 02/24/2008 - 03/01/2008 0.82 0.97*10 03/02/2008 - 03/08/2008 0.82 0.97*11 03/09/2008 - 03/15/2008 0.83 0.98*12 03/16/2008 - 03/22/2008 0.85 1.01*13 03/23/2008 - 03/29/2008 0.87 1.03*14 03/30/2008 - 04/05/2008 0.88 1.04*15 04/06/2008 - 04/12/2008 0.90 1.07 16 04/13/2008 - 04/19/2008 0.92 1.09 17 04/20/2008 - 04/26/2008 0.94 1.11 18 04/27/2008 - 05/03/2008 0.97 1.15 19 05/04/2008 - 05/10/2008 0.99 1.17 20 05/11/2008 - 05/17/2008 1.01 1.20 21 05/18/2008 - 05/24/2008 1.03 1.22 22 05/25/2008 - 05/31/2008 1.05 1.24 23 06/01/2008 - 06/07/2008 1.08 1.28 24 06/08/2008 - 06/14/2008 1.10 1.30 25 06/15/2008 - 06/21/2008 1.12 1.33 26 06/22/2008 - 06/28/2008 1.15 1.36 27 06/29/2008 - 07/05/2008 1.18 1.40 28 07/06/2008 - 07/12/2008 1.21 1.43 29 07/13/2008 - 07/19/2008 1.24 1.47 30 07/20/2008 - 07/26/2008 1.25 1.48 31 07/27/2008 - 08/02/2008 1.26 1.49 32 08/03/2008 - 08/09/2008 1.27 1.50 33 08/10/2008 - 08/16/2008 1.27 1.50 34 08/17/2008 - 08/23/2008 1.26 1.49 35 08/24/2008 - 08/30/2008 1.24 1.47 36 08/31/2008 - 09/06/2008 1.22 1.44 37 09/07/2008 - 09/13/2008 1.20 1.42 38 09/14/2008 - 09/20/2008 1.18 1.40 39 09/21/2008 - 09/27/2008 1.16 1.37 40 09/28/2008 - 10/04/2008 1.13 1.34 41 10/05/2008 - 10/11/2008 1.11 1.31 42 10/12/2008 - 10/18/2008 1.08 1.28 43 10/19/2008 - 10/25/2008 1.05 1.24 44 10/26/2008 - 11/01/2008 1.02 1.21 45 11/02/2008 - 11/08/2008 0.99 1.17 46 11/09/2008 - 11/15/2008 0.96 1.14 47 11/16/2008 - 11/22/2008 0.96 1.14 48 11/23/2008 - 11/29/2008 0.96 1.14 49 11/30/2008 - 12/06/2008 0.96 1.14 50 12/07/2008 - 12/13/2008 0.96 1.14 51 12/14/2008 - 12/20/2008 0.97 1.15 52 12/21/2008 - 12/27/2008 0.92 1.09 53 12/28/2008 - 12/31/2008 0.87 1.03

* Peak Season

Page 3 of 4

A1 - 3

2008 Peak Season Factor Category Report - Report Type: ALLCategory: 9495 ST LUCIE I95 MOCF: 0.90Week Dates SF PSCF================================================================================ 1 01/01/2008 - 01/05/2008 0.95 1.06 2 01/06/2008 - 01/12/2008 0.94 1.04 3 01/13/2008 - 01/19/2008 0.94 1.04* 4 01/20/2008 - 01/26/2008 0.93 1.03* 5 01/27/2008 - 02/02/2008 0.92 1.02* 6 02/03/2008 - 02/09/2008 0.91 1.01* 7 02/10/2008 - 02/16/2008 0.90 1.00* 8 02/17/2008 - 02/23/2008 0.89 0.99* 9 02/24/2008 - 03/01/2008 0.88 0.98*10 03/02/2008 - 03/08/2008 0.87 0.97*11 03/09/2008 - 03/15/2008 0.86 0.96*12 03/16/2008 - 03/22/2008 0.88 0.98*13 03/23/2008 - 03/29/2008 0.89 0.99*14 03/30/2008 - 04/05/2008 0.91 1.01*15 04/06/2008 - 04/12/2008 0.92 1.02*16 04/13/2008 - 04/19/2008 0.94 1.04 17 04/20/2008 - 04/26/2008 0.96 1.07 18 04/27/2008 - 05/03/2008 0.98 1.09 19 05/04/2008 - 05/10/2008 1.00 1.11 20 05/11/2008 - 05/17/2008 1.02 1.13 21 05/18/2008 - 05/24/2008 1.03 1.14 22 05/25/2008 - 05/31/2008 1.04 1.16 23 06/01/2008 - 06/07/2008 1.04 1.16 24 06/08/2008 - 06/14/2008 1.05 1.17 25 06/15/2008 - 06/21/2008 1.06 1.18 26 06/22/2008 - 06/28/2008 1.06 1.18 27 06/29/2008 - 07/05/2008 1.06 1.18 28 07/06/2008 - 07/12/2008 1.06 1.18 29 07/13/2008 - 07/19/2008 1.06 1.18 30 07/20/2008 - 07/26/2008 1.07 1.19 31 07/27/2008 - 08/02/2008 1.09 1.21 32 08/03/2008 - 08/09/2008 1.11 1.23 33 08/10/2008 - 08/16/2008 1.12 1.24 34 08/17/2008 - 08/23/2008 1.13 1.26 35 08/24/2008 - 08/30/2008 1.14 1.27 36 08/31/2008 - 09/06/2008 1.15 1.28 37 09/07/2008 - 09/13/2008 1.16 1.29 38 09/14/2008 - 09/20/2008 1.17 1.30 39 09/21/2008 - 09/27/2008 1.15 1.28 40 09/28/2008 - 10/04/2008 1.13 1.26 41 10/05/2008 - 10/11/2008 1.11 1.23 42 10/12/2008 - 10/18/2008 1.09 1.21 43 10/19/2008 - 10/25/2008 1.07 1.19 44 10/26/2008 - 11/01/2008 1.05 1.17 45 11/02/2008 - 11/08/2008 1.02 1.13 46 11/09/2008 - 11/15/2008 1.00 1.11 47 11/16/2008 - 11/22/2008 0.99 1.10 48 11/23/2008 - 11/29/2008 0.98 1.09 49 11/30/2008 - 12/06/2008 0.97 1.08 50 12/07/2008 - 12/13/2008 0.96 1.07 51 12/14/2008 - 12/20/2008 0.95 1.06 52 12/21/2008 - 12/27/2008 0.94 1.04 53 12/28/2008 - 12/31/2008 0.94 1.04

* Peak Season

Page 4 of 4

A1 - 4

2008 Weekly Axle Factor Category Report - Report Type: ALL

County: 94 - ST.LUCIE

Week Dates 9401 9407 9408 9409

COUNTY ROADS (RURAL) SR70,KINGS TO I-95 SR70,I-95 TO US 1 SR614, EMERSON-KINGS

1 01/01/2008 - 01/05/2008 0.85 0.82 0.98 0.98

2 01/06/2008 - 01/12/2008 0.84 0.82 0.98 0.98

3 01/13/2008 - 01/19/2008 0.82 0.82 0.98 0.98

4 01/20/2008 - 01/26/2008 0.82 0.82 0.98 0.98

5 01/27/2008 - 02/02/2008 0.82 0.82 0.98 0.98

6 02/03/2008 - 02/09/2008 0.82 0.82 0.98 0.98

7 02/10/2008 - 02/16/2008 0.82 0.82 0.98 0.98

8 02/17/2008 - 02/23/2008 0.82 0.82 0.98 0.98

9 02/24/2008 - 03/01/2008 0.82 0.82 0.98 0.98

10 03/02/2008 - 03/08/2008 0.82 0.82 0.98 0.98

11 03/09/2008 - 03/15/2008 0.82 0.82 0.98 0.98

12 03/16/2008 - 03/22/2008 0.84 0.82 0.98 0.98

13 03/23/2008 - 03/29/2008 0.85 0.82 0.98 0.98

14 03/30/2008 - 04/05/2008 0.87 0.82 0.98 0.98

15 04/06/2008 - 04/12/2008 0.89 0.82 0.98 0.98

16 04/13/2008 - 04/19/2008 0.90 0.82 0.98 0.98

17 04/20/2008 - 04/26/2008 0.89 0.82 0.98 0.98

18 04/27/2008 - 05/03/2008 0.88 0.82 0.98 0.98

19 05/04/2008 - 05/10/2008 0.86 0.82 0.98 0.98

20 05/11/2008 - 05/17/2008 0.85 0.82 0.98 0.98

21 05/18/2008 - 05/24/2008 0.85 0.82 0.98 0.98

22 05/25/2008 - 05/31/2008 0.86 0.82 0.98 0.98

23 06/01/2008 - 06/07/2008 0.86 0.82 0.98 0.98

24 06/08/2008 - 06/14/2008 0.87 0.82 0.98 0.98

25 06/15/2008 - 06/21/2008 0.87 0.82 0.98 0.98

26 06/22/2008 - 06/28/2008 0.88 0.82 0.98 0.98

27 06/29/2008 - 07/05/2008 0.88 0.82 0.98 0.98

28 07/06/2008 - 07/12/2008 0.89 0.82 0.98 0.98

29 07/13/2008 - 07/19/2008 0.90 0.82 0.98 0.98

30 07/20/2008 - 07/26/2008 0.90 0.82 0.98 0.98

31 07/27/2008 - 08/02/2008 0.90 0.82 0.98 0.98

32 08/03/2008 - 08/09/2008 0.90 0.82 0.98 0.98

33 08/10/2008 - 08/16/2008 0.90 0.82 0.98 0.98

34 08/17/2008 - 08/23/2008 0.90 0.82 0.98 0.98

35 08/24/2008 - 08/30/2008 0.90 0.82 0.98 0.98

36 08/31/2008 - 09/06/2008 0.89 0.82 0.98 0.98

37 09/07/2008 - 09/13/2008 0.89 0.82 0.98 0.98

38 09/14/2008 - 09/20/2008 0.89 0.82 0.98 0.98

39 09/21/2008 - 09/27/2008 0.88 0.82 0.98 0.98

40 09/28/2008 - 10/04/2008 0.88 0.82 0.98 0.98

41 10/05/2008 - 10/11/2008 0.88 0.82 0.98 0.98

42 10/12/2008 - 10/18/2008 0.87 0.82 0.98 0.98

43 10/19/2008 - 10/25/2008 0.87 0.82 0.98 0.98

44 10/26/2008 - 11/01/2008 0.87 0.82 0.98 0.98

45 11/02/2008 - 11/08/2008 0.86 0.82 0.98 0.98

46 11/09/2008 - 11/15/2008 0.86 0.82 0.98 0.98

47 11/16/2008 - 11/22/2008 0.86 0.82 0.98 0.98

48 11/23/2008 - 11/29/2008 0.86 0.82 0.98 0.98

49 11/30/2008 - 12/06/2008 0.85 0.82 0.98 0.98

50 12/07/2008 - 12/13/2008 0.85 0.82 0.98 0.98

51 12/14/2008 - 12/20/2008 0.85 0.82 0.98 0.98

52 12/21/2008 - 12/27/2008 0.84 0.82 0.98 0.98

53 12/28/2008 - 12/31/2008 0.82 0.82 0.98 0.98

A2 - 1



Week Dates 9410 9411 9412 9413

COUNTY ROADS (URBAN) SR713, I-95-US 1 I-95 SR713, SR70 - I-95

1 01/01/2008 - 01/05/2008 0.98 0.95 0.86 0.84

2 01/06/2008 - 01/12/2008 0.98 0.95 0.86 0.84

3 01/13/2008 - 01/19/2008 0.98 0.95 0.86 0.84

4 01/20/2008 - 01/26/2008 0.98 0.95 0.86 0.84

5 01/27/2008 - 02/02/2008 0.98 0.95 0.85 0.84

6 02/03/2008 - 02/09/2008 0.98 0.95 0.84 0.84

7 02/10/2008 - 02/16/2008 0.98 0.95 0.84 0.84

8 02/17/2008 - 02/23/2008 0.98 0.95 0.84 0.84

9 02/24/2008 - 03/01/2008 0.98 0.95 0.85 0.84

10 03/02/2008 - 03/08/2008 0.98 0.95 0.85 0.84

11 03/09/2008 - 03/15/2008 0.98 0.95 0.85 0.84

12 03/16/2008 - 03/22/2008 0.98 0.95 0.85 0.84

13 03/23/2008 - 03/29/2008 0.98 0.95 0.85 0.84

14 03/30/2008 - 04/05/2008 0.98 0.95 0.85 0.84

15 04/06/2008 - 04/12/2008 0.98 0.95 0.85 0.84

16 04/13/2008 - 04/19/2008 0.98 0.95 0.85 0.84

17 04/20/2008 - 04/26/2008 0.98 0.95 0.85 0.84

18 04/27/2008 - 05/03/2008 0.98 0.95 0.84 0.84

19 05/04/2008 - 05/10/2008 0.98 0.95 0.83 0.84

20 05/11/2008 - 05/17/2008 0.98 0.95 0.83 0.84

21 05/18/2008 - 05/24/2008 0.98 0.95 0.83 0.84

22 05/25/2008 - 05/31/2008 0.98 0.95 0.83 0.84

23 06/01/2008 - 06/07/2008 0.98 0.95 0.84 0.84

24 06/08/2008 - 06/14/2008 0.98 0.95 0.84 0.84

25 06/15/2008 - 06/21/2008 0.98 0.95 0.84 0.84

26 06/22/2008 - 06/28/2008 0.98 0.95 0.84 0.84

27 06/29/2008 - 07/05/2008 0.98 0.95 0.84 0.84

28 07/06/2008 - 07/12/2008 0.98 0.95 0.84 0.84

29 07/13/2008 - 07/19/2008 0.98 0.95 0.84 0.84

30 07/20/2008 - 07/26/2008 0.98 0.95 0.84 0.84

31 07/27/2008 - 08/02/2008 0.98 0.95 0.85 0.84

32 08/03/2008 - 08/09/2008 0.98 0.95 0.85 0.84

33 08/10/2008 - 08/16/2008 0.98 0.95 0.85 0.84

34 08/17/2008 - 08/23/2008 0.98 0.95 0.85 0.84

35 08/24/2008 - 08/30/2008 0.98 0.95 0.84 0.84

36 08/31/2008 - 09/06/2008 0.98 0.95 0.84 0.84

37 09/07/2008 - 09/13/2008 0.98 0.95 0.83 0.84

38 09/14/2008 - 09/20/2008 0.98 0.95 0.83 0.84

39 09/21/2008 - 09/27/2008 0.98 0.95 0.83 0.84

40 09/28/2008 - 10/04/2008 0.98 0.95 0.83 0.84

41 10/05/2008 - 10/11/2008 0.98 0.95 0.83 0.84

42 10/12/2008 - 10/18/2008 0.98 0.95 0.83 0.84

43 10/19/2008 - 10/25/2008 0.98 0.95 0.84 0.84

44 10/26/2008 - 11/01/2008 0.98 0.95 0.85 0.84

45 11/02/2008 - 11/08/2008 0.98 0.95 0.85 0.84

46 11/09/2008 - 11/15/2008 0.98 0.95 0.86 0.84

47 11/16/2008 - 11/22/2008 0.98 0.95 0.86 0.84

48 11/23/2008 - 11/29/2008 0.98 0.95 0.86 0.84

49 11/30/2008 - 12/06/2008 0.98 0.95 0.86 0.84

50 12/07/2008 - 12/13/2008 0.98 0.95 0.86 0.84

51 12/14/2008 - 12/20/2008 0.98 0.95 0.86 0.84

52 12/21/2008 - 12/27/2008 0.98 0.95 0.86 0.84

53 12/28/2008 - 12/31/2008 0.98 0.95 0.86 0.84

A2 - 2



Week Dates 9414 9415 9416 9417

SR614, I95-EMERSON SR615/25TH ST SR608,ST LUCIE BLVD SR5, MARTIN CO - IND

1 01/01/2008 - 01/05/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

2 01/06/2008 - 01/12/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

3 01/13/2008 - 01/19/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

4 01/20/2008 - 01/26/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

5 01/27/2008 - 02/02/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

6 02/03/2008 - 02/09/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

7 02/10/2008 - 02/16/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

8 02/17/2008 - 02/23/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

9 02/24/2008 - 03/01/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

10 03/02/2008 - 03/08/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

11 03/09/2008 - 03/15/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

12 03/16/2008 - 03/22/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

13 03/23/2008 - 03/29/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

14 03/30/2008 - 04/05/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

15 04/06/2008 - 04/12/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

16 04/13/2008 - 04/19/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

17 04/20/2008 - 04/26/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

18 04/27/2008 - 05/03/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

19 05/04/2008 - 05/10/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

20 05/11/2008 - 05/17/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

21 05/18/2008 - 05/24/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

22 05/25/2008 - 05/31/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

23 06/01/2008 - 06/07/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

24 06/08/2008 - 06/14/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

25 06/15/2008 - 06/21/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

26 06/22/2008 - 06/28/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

27 06/29/2008 - 07/05/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

28 07/06/2008 - 07/12/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

29 07/13/2008 - 07/19/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

30 07/20/2008 - 07/26/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

31 07/27/2008 - 08/02/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

32 08/03/2008 - 08/09/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

33 08/10/2008 - 08/16/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

34 08/17/2008 - 08/23/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

35 08/24/2008 - 08/30/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

36 08/31/2008 - 09/06/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

37 09/07/2008 - 09/13/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

38 09/14/2008 - 09/20/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

39 09/21/2008 - 09/27/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

40 09/28/2008 - 10/04/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

41 10/05/2008 - 10/11/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

42 10/12/2008 - 10/18/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

43 10/19/2008 - 10/25/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

44 10/26/2008 - 11/01/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

45 11/02/2008 - 11/08/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

46 11/09/2008 - 11/15/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

47 11/16/2008 - 11/22/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

48 11/23/2008 - 11/29/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

49 11/30/2008 - 12/06/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

50 12/07/2008 - 12/13/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

51 12/14/2008 - 12/20/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

52 12/21/2008 - 12/27/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

53 12/28/2008 - 12/31/2008 0.93 0.99 0.95 0.95

A2 - 3



Week Dates 9418 9420 9421 9422

SR70, OKEE CO-KINGS A1A(S), MART TO SR5 A1A(N), SR5 - INDIAN SR68, KINGS-ANGLE RD

1 01/01/2008 - 01/05/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

2 01/06/2008 - 01/12/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

3 01/13/2008 - 01/19/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

4 01/20/2008 - 01/26/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

5 01/27/2008 - 02/02/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

6 02/03/2008 - 02/09/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

7 02/10/2008 - 02/16/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

8 02/17/2008 - 02/23/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

9 02/24/2008 - 03/01/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

10 03/02/2008 - 03/08/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

11 03/09/2008 - 03/15/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

12 03/16/2008 - 03/22/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

13 03/23/2008 - 03/29/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

14 03/30/2008 - 04/05/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

15 04/06/2008 - 04/12/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

16 04/13/2008 - 04/19/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

17 04/20/2008 - 04/26/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

18 04/27/2008 - 05/03/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

19 05/04/2008 - 05/10/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

20 05/11/2008 - 05/17/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

21 05/18/2008 - 05/24/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

22 05/25/2008 - 05/31/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

23 06/01/2008 - 06/07/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

24 06/08/2008 - 06/14/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

25 06/15/2008 - 06/21/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

26 06/22/2008 - 06/28/2008 0.88 0.98 0.97 0.96

27 06/29/2008 - 07/05/2008 0.88 0.98 0.97 0.96

28 07/06/2008 - 07/12/2008 0.88 0.97 0.97 0.96

29 07/13/2008 - 07/19/2008 0.88 0.96 0.97 0.96

30 07/20/2008 - 07/26/2008 0.88 0.97 0.97 0.96

31 07/27/2008 - 08/02/2008 0.88 0.97 0.97 0.96

32 08/03/2008 - 08/09/2008 0.88 0.98 0.97 0.96

33 08/10/2008 - 08/16/2008 0.88 0.98 0.97 0.96

34 08/17/2008 - 08/23/2008 0.88 0.98 0.97 0.96

35 08/24/2008 - 08/30/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

36 08/31/2008 - 09/06/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

37 09/07/2008 - 09/13/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

38 09/14/2008 - 09/20/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

39 09/21/2008 - 09/27/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

40 09/28/2008 - 10/04/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

41 10/05/2008 - 10/11/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

42 10/12/2008 - 10/18/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

43 10/19/2008 - 10/25/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

44 10/26/2008 - 11/01/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

45 11/02/2008 - 11/08/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

46 11/09/2008 - 11/15/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

47 11/16/2008 - 11/22/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

48 11/23/2008 - 11/29/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

49 11/30/2008 - 12/06/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

50 12/07/2008 - 12/13/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

51 12/14/2008 - 12/20/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

52 12/21/2008 - 12/27/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

53 12/28/2008 - 12/31/2008 0.88 0.99 0.97 0.96

A2 - 4



Week Dates 9423 9424 9425 9427

AVE "A" SR707, US1 - AVE "A" SR716, TURNPIKE-US 1 SR68,ANGLE-INDIAN DR

1 01/01/2008 - 01/05/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

2 01/06/2008 - 01/12/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

3 01/13/2008 - 01/19/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

4 01/20/2008 - 01/26/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

5 01/27/2008 - 02/02/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

6 02/03/2008 - 02/09/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

7 02/10/2008 - 02/16/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

8 02/17/2008 - 02/23/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

9 02/24/2008 - 03/01/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

10 03/02/2008 - 03/08/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

11 03/09/2008 - 03/15/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

12 03/16/2008 - 03/22/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

13 03/23/2008 - 03/29/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

14 03/30/2008 - 04/05/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

15 04/06/2008 - 04/12/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

16 04/13/2008 - 04/19/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

17 04/20/2008 - 04/26/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

18 04/27/2008 - 05/03/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

19 05/04/2008 - 05/10/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

20 05/11/2008 - 05/17/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

21 05/18/2008 - 05/24/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

22 05/25/2008 - 05/31/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

23 06/01/2008 - 06/07/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

24 06/08/2008 - 06/14/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

25 06/15/2008 - 06/21/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

26 06/22/2008 - 06/28/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

27 06/29/2008 - 07/05/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

28 07/06/2008 - 07/12/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

29 07/13/2008 - 07/19/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

30 07/20/2008 - 07/26/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

31 07/27/2008 - 08/02/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

32 08/03/2008 - 08/09/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

33 08/10/2008 - 08/16/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

34 08/17/2008 - 08/23/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

35 08/24/2008 - 08/30/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

36 08/31/2008 - 09/06/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

37 09/07/2008 - 09/13/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

38 09/14/2008 - 09/20/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

39 09/21/2008 - 09/27/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

40 09/28/2008 - 10/04/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

41 10/05/2008 - 10/11/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

42 10/12/2008 - 10/18/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

43 10/19/2008 - 10/25/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

44 10/26/2008 - 11/01/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

45 11/02/2008 - 11/08/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

46 11/09/2008 - 11/15/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

47 11/16/2008 - 11/22/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

48 11/23/2008 - 11/29/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

49 11/30/2008 - 12/06/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

50 12/07/2008 - 12/13/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

51 12/14/2008 - 12/20/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

52 12/21/2008 - 12/27/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

53 12/28/2008 - 12/31/2008 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.89

A2 - 5



Week Dates 9430

GATLIN, I95-TPIKE

1 01/01/2008 - 01/05/2008 0.96

2 01/06/2008 - 01/12/2008 0.96

3 01/13/2008 - 01/19/2008 0.96

4 01/20/2008 - 01/26/2008 0.96

5 01/27/2008 - 02/02/2008 0.96

6 02/03/2008 - 02/09/2008 0.96

7 02/10/2008 - 02/16/2008 0.96

8 02/17/2008 - 02/23/2008 0.96

9 02/24/2008 - 03/01/2008 0.96

10 03/02/2008 - 03/08/2008 0.96

11 03/09/2008 - 03/15/2008 0.96

12 03/16/2008 - 03/22/2008 0.96

13 03/23/2008 - 03/29/2008 0.96

14 03/30/2008 - 04/05/2008 0.96

15 04/06/2008 - 04/12/2008 0.96

16 04/13/2008 - 04/19/2008 0.96

17 04/20/2008 - 04/26/2008 0.96

18 04/27/2008 - 05/03/2008 0.96

19 05/04/2008 - 05/10/2008 0.96

20 05/11/2008 - 05/17/2008 0.96

21 05/18/2008 - 05/24/2008 0.96

22 05/25/2008 - 05/31/2008 0.96

23 06/01/2008 - 06/07/2008 0.96

24 06/08/2008 - 06/14/2008 0.96

25 06/15/2008 - 06/21/2008 0.96

26 06/22/2008 - 06/28/2008 0.96

27 06/29/2008 - 07/05/2008 0.96

28 07/06/2008 - 07/12/2008 0.96

29 07/13/2008 - 07/19/2008 0.96

30 07/20/2008 - 07/26/2008 0.96

31 07/27/2008 - 08/02/2008 0.96

32 08/03/2008 - 08/09/2008 0.96

33 08/10/2008 - 08/16/2008 0.96

34 08/17/2008 - 08/23/2008 0.96

35 08/24/2008 - 08/30/2008 0.96

36 08/31/2008 - 09/06/2008 0.96

37 09/07/2008 - 09/13/2008 0.96

38 09/14/2008 - 09/20/2008 0.96

39 09/21/2008 - 09/27/2008 0.96

40 09/28/2008 - 10/04/2008 0.96

41 10/05/2008 - 10/11/2008 0.96

42 10/12/2008 - 10/18/2008 0.96

43 10/19/2008 - 10/25/2008 0.96

44 10/26/2008 - 11/01/2008 0.96

45 11/02/2008 - 11/08/2008 0.96

46 11/09/2008 - 11/15/2008 0.96

47 11/16/2008 - 11/22/2008 0.96

48 11/23/2008 - 11/29/2008 0.96

49 11/30/2008 - 12/06/2008 0.96

50 12/07/2008 - 12/13/2008 0.96

51 12/14/2008 - 12/20/2008 0.96

52 12/21/2008 - 12/27/2008 0.96

53 12/28/2008 - 12/31/2008 0.96

A2 - 6

APPENDIX B

ST. LUCIE COUNTY


Traffic Count Report Examples

1. Count Station Report

2. Count Station History Report

3. Count Station Regression Report

St Lucie County TPOCount Station Report (Volume)

Tuesday12:00 AM08/05/2008

Begin Day of Week:Summary Begin Time:Summary Begin Date:NInterstate (Y or N):

W OF SR 91/TPK (COUNTY 25)SR 70/OKEECHOBEE RD940025

Location:Roadway:

Count Station:

EndingHour

TotalTwo-WayAverageTotalDay 3Day 2Day 1Hour

Ending EastWestDay 3Day 2Day 1EastWestEastWestEastWest

SPS File: G:\vTIMAS\St_Lucie\Counts\Sps\Out\2008\940025.TXT

01:00 01:00 14 20 16 11 0 0 34 27 0 15 16 3102:00 02:00 6 8 7 16 0 0 14 23 0 6 12 1803:00 03:00 8 12 22 11 0 0 20 33 0 15 12 2704:00 04:00 13 26 18 32 0 0 39 50 0 16 29 4505:00 05:00 23 23 38 25 0 0 46 63 0 30 24 5406:00 06:00 58 82 53 82 0 0 140 135 0 56 82 13807:00 07:00 170 180 209 200 0 0 350 409 0 190 190 38008:00 08:00 217 259 244 279 0 0 476 523 0 230 269 49909:00 09:00 234 251 230 259 0 0 485 489 0 232 255 48710:00 10:00 200 258 259 217 0 0 458 476 0 230 238 46811:00 11:00 219 232 231 259 0 0 451 490 0 225 246 47112:00 12:00 193 227 244 246 0 0 420 490 0 218 236 45413:00 13:00 260 227 286 250 0 0 487 536 0 273 238 51114:00 14:00 232 245 285 289 0 0 477 574 0 258 267 52515:00 15:00 226 242 228 275 0 0 468 503 0 227 258 48516:00 16:00 274 239 260 226 0 0 513 486 0 267 232 49917:00 17:00 281 234 267 252 0 0 515 519 0 274 243 51718:00 18:00 279 243 289 243 0 0 522 532 0 284 243 52719:00 19:00 157 151 157 151 0 0 308 308 0 157 151 30820:00 20:00 143 105 120 110 0 0 248 230 0 132 108 24021:00 21:00 109 59 129 122 0 0 168 251 0 119 90 20922:00 22:00 71 61 85 58 0 0 132 143 0 78 60 13823:00 23:00 62 47 68 32 0 0 109 100 0 65 40 10524:00 24:00 30 30 23 22 0 0 60 45 0 26 26 52

Totals:

QC Checks:

7.7% 7.1% 0%

7.8% 7.7% 0%

8.4%

1.3%

10% Yes

10% Yes

0.544 0.537 0.000

0.578 0.503 0.000

1.3% 10% Yes

14.9% 10% No

7:15am 7:45am

4:30pm 1:00pm

30 30 Yes

210 30 No

AM P:D:

AM DFactor:

AM Pk Hr Begins:

PM Pk Hr Begins:

PM DFactor:

PM P:D:

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Difference Standard Passed

Daily DFactor:

Pk Dr DFactor:

P:D Ratio:

Traffic:

Peak Direction:

PassedHighLowDay 3Day 2Day 1

7.8% 7.7% 0% 0.075 0.120 Yes 0.578 0.537 0.000 50% 65% Yes

0.501 0.507 0.000 50% 55% Yes

West West North Yes

PS Factor:Axle Factor:

AADT Factor: 1.06

1.06 1.00

AADT:

PSDT:

7,619

7,188

PHF:DFactor:

P:D Ratio:

Average Traffic Characteristics:

PMAM

.074% .078%

0.541 0.541 0.917 0.902

Checked By:

3,479 3,461 3,768 3,667 0 0 6,940 7,435 0 3,623 3,565 7,188ADT:

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

01:0

0

02:0

0

03:0

0

04:0

0

05:0

0

06:0

0

07:0

0

08:0

0

09:0

0

10:0

0

11:0

0

12:0

0

13:0

0

14:0

0

15:0

0

16:0

0

17:0

0

18:0

0

19:0

0

20:0

0

21:0

0

22:0

0

23:0

0

24:0

0

Volumes

Tindale-Oliver and AssociatesB1 - 1

1/21

/201

0R

epor

t Dat

e:

CS

Dat

eLo

catio

nR

oadw

ay

Inte

rsta

te

AA

DT

Axl

e

SA

F

Fac

tors

PS

Mid

Hea

vy

HV

Avg

Day

3D

ay2

Day

1D

irect

ion

AD

T

PS

DT

AA

DT

DP

kHr

SP

S F

ile L

ocat

ion

PkH

r D

P:D

Day

of W

eek

Beg

in T

ime

Sou

rce

St

Lu

cie

TP

O

Co

un

t S

tati

on

His

tory

Rep

ort

(V

olu

me)

Pea

k D

ir

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

2008

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25W

est

Eas

t 4

,078

3,4

22 0 0

0 0 7

,500

0 0

4,0

78 3

,422

7,5

00N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

7,5

00 7

,500

0.0

0 0

.54

0.5

4 1

.00

0.1

15F

TI

Tue

sday

Wes

t

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

2007

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 4

,827

3,4

73 0 0

0 0 8

,300

0 0

4,8

27 3

,473

8,3

00N

1.0

0 1

.00

8.82

%10

.85%

19.6

7%

8,3

00 8

,300

0.0

0 0

.58

0.5

8 1

.00

0.1

15F

TI

Mon

day

Eas

t

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

2006

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25W

est

Eas

t 4

,443

3,3

57 0 0

0 0 7

,800

0 0

4,4

43 3

,357

7,8

00N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

7,8

00 7

,800

0.0

0 0

.57

0.5

7 1

.00

0.1

08F

TI

Sun

day

Wes

t

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

2005

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 4

,698

3,6

02 0 0

0 0 8

,300

0 0

4,6

98 3

,602

8,3

00N

1.0

0 1

.00

6.59

%8.

11%

14.7

0%

8,3

00 8

,300

0.0

0 0

.57

0.5

7 1

.00

0.1

11F

TI

Sat

urda

yE

ast

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

2004

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25W

est

Eas

t 4

,477

2,9

23 0 0

0 0 7

,400

0 0

4,4

77 2

,923

7,4

00N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

7,4

00 7

,400

0.0

0 0

.61

0.6

1 1

.00

0.1

11F

TI

Thu

rsda

yW

est

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

2003

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25W

est

Eas

t 4

,074

2,9

26 0 0

0 0 7

,000

0 0

4,0

74 2

,926

7,0

00N

1.0

0 1

.00

10.6

0%8.

40%

19.0

0%

7,0

00 7

,000

0.0

0 0

.58

0.5

8 1

.00

0.1

10F

TI

Wed

nesd

ayW

est

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

2002

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 3

,304

2,5

96 0 0

0 0 5

,900

0 0

3,3

04 2

,596

5,9

00N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

5,9

00 5

,900

0.0

0 0

.56

0.5

6 1

.00

0.1

09F

TI

Tue

sday

Eas

t

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

2001

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25W

est

Eas

t 3

,460

2,7

40 0 0

0 0 6

,200

0 0

3,4

60 2

,740

6,2

00N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

6,2

00 6

,200

0.0

0 0

.56

0.5

6 1

.00

0.1

12F

TI

Mon

day

Wes

t

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

2000

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25W

est

Eas

t 3

,846

2,8

54 0 0

0 0 6

,700

0 0

3,8

46 2

,854

6,7

00N

1.0

0 1

.00

7.20

%9.

10%

16.3

0%

6,7

00 6

,700

0.0

0 0

.57

0.5

8 1

.00

0.1

07F

TI

Sat

urda

yW

est

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1999

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25W

est

Eas

t 3

,731

2,6

69 0 0

0 0 6

,400

0 0

3,7

31 2

,669

6,4

00N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

6,4

00 6

,400

0.0

0 0

.58

0.5

8 1

.00

0.1

14F

TI

Frid

ayW

est

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1998

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25W

est

Eas

t 3

,140

2,3

60 0 0

0 0 5

,500

0 0

3,1

40 2

,360

5,5

00N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

5,5

00 5

,500

0.0

0 0

.57

0.5

7 1

.00

0.1

11F

TI

Thu

rsda

yW

est

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1997

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 3

,339

2,5

61 0 0

0 0 5

,900

0 0

3,3

39 2

,561

5,9

00N

1.0

0 1

.00

4.20

%7.

90%

12.1

0%

5,9

00 5

,900

0.0

0 0

.57

0.5

7 1

.00

0.1

05F

TI

Wed

nesd

ayE

ast

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1996

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25W

est

Eas

t 3

,207

2,5

93 0 0

0 0 5

,800

0 0

3,2

07 2

,593

5,8

00N

1.0

0 1

.00

5.80

%6.

40%

12.2

0%

5,8

00 5

,800

0.0

0 0

.55

0.5

5 1

.00

0.1

09F

TI

Mon

day

Wes

t

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1995

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25W

est

Eas

t 4

,399

3,4

01 0 0

0 0 7

,800

0 0

4,3

99 3

,401

7,8

00N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

7,8

00 7

,800

0.0

0 0

.56

0.5

6 1

.00

0.1

12F

TI

Sun

day

Wes

t

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1994

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25W

est

Eas

t 3

,008

2,3

92 0 0

0 0 5

,400

0 0

3,0

08 2

,392

5,4

00N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

5,4

00 5

,400

0.0

0 0

.56

0.5

6 1

.00

0.1

03F

TI

Sat

urda

yW

est

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1993

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25W

est

Eas

t 2

,500

2,6

00 0 0

0 0 5

,100

0 0

2,5

00 2

,600

5,1

00N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

5,1

00 5

,100

0.0

0 0

.51

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Frid

ayE

ast

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1992

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25W

est

Eas

t 3

,200

3,3

00 0 0

0 0 6

,500

0 0

3,2

00 3

,300

6,5

00N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

6,5

00 6

,500

0.0

0 0

.51

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Wed

nesd

ayE

ast

Tin

dale

-Oli

ver

and

Ass

ocia

tes

1P

age

Num

ber:

B2 - 1

1/21

/201

0R

epor

t Dat

e:

CS

Dat

eLo

catio

nR

oadw

ay

Inte

rsta

te

AA

DT

Axl

e

SA

F

Fac

tors

PS

Mid

Hea

vy

HV

Avg

Day

3D

ay2

Day

1D

irect

ion

AD

T

PS

DT

AA

DT

DP

kHr

SP

S F

ile L

ocat

ion

PkH

r D

P:D

Day

of W

eek

Beg

in T

ime

Sou

rce

St

Lu

cie

TP

O

Co

un

t S

tati

on

His

tory

Rep

ort

(V

olu

me)

Pea

k D

ir

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1991

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 5

,189

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

5,1

89 5

,189

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Tue

sday

Wes

t

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1990

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 5

,414

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

5,4

14 5

,414

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Mon

day

Wes

t

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1989

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 5

,963

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

5,9

63 5

,963

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Sun

day

Wes

t

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1988

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 5

,219

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

5,2

19 5

,219

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Frid

ayW

est

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1987

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 5

,376

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

5,3

76 5

,376

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Thu

rsda

yW

est

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1986

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 4

,721

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

4,7

21 4

,721

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Wed

nesd

ayW

est

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1985

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 3

,483

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

3,4

83 3

,483

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Tue

sday

Wes

t

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1984

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 4

,227

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

4,2

27 4

,227

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Sun

day

Wes

t

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1983

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 3

,922

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

3,9

22 3

,922

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Sat

urda

yW

est

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1982

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 3

,641

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

3,6

41 3

,641

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Frid

ayW

est

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1981

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 3

,755

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

3,7

55 3

,755

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Thu

rsda

yW

est

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1980

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 3

,771

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

3,7

71 3

,771

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Tue

sday

Wes

t

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1979

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 3

,639

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

3,6

39 3

,639

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Mon

day

Wes

t

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1978

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 4

,316

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

4,3

16 4

,316

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Sun

day

Wes

t

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1977

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 3

,969

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

3,9

69 3

,969

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Sat

urda

yW

est

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1976

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 3

,888

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

3,8

88 3

,888

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Thu

rsda

yW

est

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1975

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 1

,654

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

1,6

54 1

,654

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Wed

nesd

ayW

est

Tin

dale

-Oli

ver

and

Ass

ocia

tes

2P

age

Num

ber:

B2 - 2

1/21

/201

0R

epor

t Dat

e:

CS

Dat

eLo

catio

nR

oadw

ay

Inte

rsta

te

AA

DT

Axl

e

SA

F

Fac

tors

PS

Mid

Hea

vy

HV

Avg

Day

3D

ay2

Day

1D

irect

ion

AD

T

PS

DT

AA

DT

DP

kHr

SP

S F

ile L

ocat

ion

PkH

r D

P:D

Day

of W

eek

Beg

in T

ime

Sou

rce

St

Lu

cie

TP

O

Co

un

t S

tati

on

His

tory

Rep

ort

(V

olu

me)

Pea

k D

ir

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1974

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 2

,378

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

2,3

78 2

,378

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Tue

sday

Wes

t

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1973

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 3

,225

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

3,2

25 3

,225

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Mon

day

Wes

t

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1972

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 3

,177

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

3,1

77 3

,177

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Sat

urda

yW

est

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1971

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 3

,317

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

3,3

17 3

,317

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Frid

ayW

est

W O

F S

R 9

1/T

PK

(C

OU

NT

Y 2

5)01

/01/

1970

SR

70/

OK

EE

CH

OB

EE

RD

9400

25E

ast

Wes

t 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0 3

,485

N

1.0

0 1

.00

.00%

.00%

.00%

3,4

85 3

,485

0.0

0 0

.00

0.0

0 1

.00

0.0

00F

TI

Thu

rsda

yW

est

Tin

dale

-Oli

ver

and

Ass

ocia

tes

3P

age

Num

ber:

B2 - 3

Count Station:Roadway:Location:

Report Date:940025SR 70/OKEECHOBEE RDW OF SR 91/TPK (COUNTY 25)

St Lucie County TPOCount Station Regression Report (Volume)

1/21/2010History Start Year:History End Year:

1970 2008

Regression Summary:

Future Growth Rate (FGR): 1.0176 (Calculated)

Slope: Intercept: 135.89 -265,126.46Regression Growth Rate: 1.0176

Year StudyDate Source AADT PeakToDaily PSDT

Historical Count Data Summary:

2008 01/01/2008 FTI 7,500 0.1150 7,500

2007 01/01/2007 FTI 8,300 0.1150 8,300

2006 01/01/2006 FTI 7,800 0.1080 7,800

2005 01/01/2005 FTI 8,300 0.1110 8,300

2004 01/01/2004 FTI 7,400 0.1110 7,400

2003 01/01/2003 FTI 7,000 0.1100 7,000

2002 01/01/2002 FTI 5,900 0.1090 5,900

2001 01/01/2001 FTI 6,200 0.1120 6,200

2000 01/01/2000 FTI 6,700 0.1070 6,700

1999 01/01/1999 FTI 6,400 0.1140 6,400

1998 01/01/1998 FTI 5,500 0.1110 5,500

1997 01/01/1997 FTI 5,900 0.1050 5,900

1996 01/01/1996 FTI 5,800 0.1090 5,800

1995 01/01/1995 FTI 7,800 0.1120 7,800

1994 01/01/1994 FTI 5,400 0.1030 5,400

1993 01/01/1993 FTI 5,100 0.0000 5,100

1992 01/01/1992 FTI 6,500 0.0000 6,500

1991 01/01/1991 FTI 5,189 0.0000 5,189

1990 01/01/1990 FTI 5,414 0.0000 5,414

1989 01/01/1989 FTI 5,963 0.0000 5,963

1988 01/01/1988 FTI 5,219 0.0000 5,219

1987 01/01/1987 FTI 5,376 0.0000 5,376

1986 01/01/1986 FTI 4,721 0.0000 4,721

1985 01/01/1985 FTI 3,483 0.0000 3,483

1984 01/01/1984 FTI 4,227 0.0000 4,227

1983 01/01/1983 FTI 3,922 0.0000 3,922

1982 01/01/1982 FTI 3,641 0.0000 3,641

1981 01/01/1981 FTI 3,755 0.0000 3,755

1980 01/01/1980 FTI 3,771 0.0000 3,771

1979 01/01/1979 FTI 3,639 0.0000 3,639

1978 01/01/1978 FTI 4,316 0.0000 4,316

1977 01/01/1977 FTI 3,969 0.0000 3,969

1976 01/01/1976 FTI 3,888 0.0000 3,888

Tindale-Oliver and AssociatesTampa, Florida

Produced using: vTIMAS v1.163 1Page Number:

B3 - 1

Year StudyDate Source AADT PeakToDaily PSDT

Historical Count Data Summary:

1975 01/01/1975 FTI 1,654 0.0000 1,654

1974 01/01/1974 FTI 2,378 0.0000 2,378

1973 01/01/1973 FTI 3,225 0.0000 3,225

1972 01/01/1972 FTI 3,177 0.0000 3,177

1971 01/01/1971 FTI 3,317 0.0000 3,317

1970 01/01/1970 FTI 3,485 0.0000 3,485

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

19

70

19

71

19

72

19

73

19

74

19

75

19

76

19

77

19

78

19

79

19

80

19

81

19

82

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

87

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

20

03

20

04

20

05

20

06

20

07

20

08

AADT

Regression

Sigma1

Sigma2

Regression Graph:

AA

DT

Vo

lum

e

Tindale-Oliver and AssociatesTampa, Florida

Produced using: vTIMAS v1.163 2Page Number:

B3 - 2

APPENDIX C

ST. LUCIE COUNTY


Traffic Count Program Implementation Cost

Tra

ffic

Co

un

t an

d L

evel

of

Ser

vice

An

alys

is a

nd

Rep

ort

ing

To

ols

Pri

nci

pal

-in

-Ch

arg

eP

roje

ctM

anag

erS

enio

rP

lan

ner

Sen

ior

En

gin

eer

En

gin

eer

GIS

An

alys

tP

lan

ner

Tec

hn

icia

nA

dm

in/C

leri

cal

200.

00$

17

6.63

$

102.

27$

12

5.39

$

83.4

9$

90.3

0$

70.6

2$

62.0

5$

54.8

2$

Sof

twar

e R

ight

sn/

a20

,000

.00

$

Acc

epta

nce

1624

3636

411

6

14,5

90.9

2$

In

stal

lati

on &

Set

-Up

1236

244

76

8,

304.

76$

TP

O/C

ount

y S

taff

Tra

inin

g8

408

864

7,13

2.48

$

20

10 T

raff

ic C

ount

Pro

cess

ing

& Q

C12

2424

6012

0

12,8

80.0

8$

Tot

al H

ours

:48

4811

28

4836

600

16-

Tot

al L

abor

:9,

600.

00$

8,47

8.24

$

11

,454

.24

$

1,00

3.12

$

4,

007.

52$

3,25

0.80

$

4,

237.

20$

-$

87

7.12

$

42,9

08.2

4$

62

,908

.24

$

Dir

ect

Exp

ense

sU

nit

sR

ate

Tot

alT

otal

Tra

vel

3580

0.50

0$

1,79

0.00

$

L

abor

:62

,908

.24

$

Cop

ies,

Pre

sent

atio

n an

d D

eliv

erab

les

165

0.00

$

650.

00$

T

otal

Tot

al2,

440.

00$

Ex p

ense

s:2,

440.

00$

TO

TA

LC

OS

TS

:65

,348

.24

$

AC

TIV

ITY

TO

TA

LH

OU

RS

CO

ST

BY

AC

TIV

ITY

St.

Lu

cie

TP

O T

raff

ic C

ou

nts

Pro

gra

mE

stim

ated

Bu

dg

et

C - 1

traffic counts program evaluation …apps.tindaleoliver.com/webtcdms/docs/5_tm4.pdftraffic counts...

Documents