TQF 5: Course Report1. InstitutionMahidol University International College

2. Faculty/Division/ProgramKiattipoom Nantanukul / Part-time Lecturer

Section 1: General Information1. Course code and nameICEM212 Basic Acting Technique

2. Pre-requisite (if any)

3. LecturerKiattipoom Nantanukul

4. TrimesterII

5. Venue

Section 2: Comparison of Actual Course Operation with the Course Plan

1. Actual teaching hours compared with the teaching planTopicTeaching HoursActual Teaching HoursReasons (if the difference is more than 25%)

What is acting? Actors tools; relaxation and warm-up44

Concentration, imagination, truth, and sincerity of the actors44

The art of storytelling88

Objective, magic-if, sensory and memory exercises, and improvisation44

Sensory and memory exercises44

Solo improvised scene work88

Awareness, energy, sensitiveness, Action vs. Reaction44

Duo Improvisation44

Duo improvised scene work88

Script analysis44

Character building44

Space and balancing the space44

Animal exercise44

Scene for two actors: developing the scene2424

2. Topics that couldnt be taught as plannedTopics that couldnt be taught (if any)Significance of the topics that couldnt be taughtRemedial action

NONE

3. Effectiveness of the teaching methods specified in the Course SpecificationLearning OutcomesTeaching methods specified in the course specification (TQF 3)Effectiveness(Use )Problems of the teaching method(s) (if any) and suggestions

YesNo

Morals and Ethics

Knowledge

Cognitive Skills

Interpersonal Skills and Responsibilities

Numerical Analysis, Communication and Information Technology Skills

4. Suggestions to improve the teaching method

Section 3: Course Report1. Number of students registered20

2. Number of students at the end of the term20

3. Number of student withdrawing the course (W)-

4. Grade distributionGradeStudentsPercentage

A525

B+840

B735

C+

C

D+

D

F

Incomplete (I)

Pass (P, S)

Not pass (U)

Withdraw (W)

5. Factors causing unusual distribution of grades (If any)

6. Discrepancies in the evaluation plan specified in the Course Specification6.1. Discrepancy in evaluation time frame No Yes (explain)DiscrepancyReasons

6.2. Discrepancy in evaluation method No Yes (explain)DiscrepancyReasons

7. Verification of students achievementsVerification MethodResult

Section 4: Problems and Their Impacts on Course Operation1. Problems related to teaching and learning resources No Yes (explain)ProblemsImpacts

2. Problems related to curriculum management and institution No Yes (explain)ProblemsImpacts

Section 5: Course Evaluation

1. Students evaluation (attach document)Critical comments from students evaluationLecturers feedback on the issue

2. Evaluation of the course using other methodsCritical comments from the evaluationLecturers feedback on the issue

Section 6: Plan for Improvement1. Developments from suggestions made in the previous course reportSuggestions/Recommendation from Previous Course ReportDevelopments

2. Other developments/improvement of the course

3. Suggestions/recommendations for future course improvementRecommendationTimeframeResponsible Person

4. Suggestions/comments from the course lecturer to the Program Director/Coordinator

NameDate

Course Lecturer

Program Director/Coordinator

MUIC TQF 5Page 5