tpm cycle a
TRANSCRIPT
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
01
What does Current State Feel like?Cycle A - Understanding where you are.
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
02
Developing Best Practice
30%DAILY OPERATIONS
70%FIREFIGHTING
20%FIRE-FIGHTING
20%DAILY OPERATIONS
In any Company, 70% fire-fighting is caused by two main phenomena:
Lack of Communication-(Cause)Lack of Adherence to Standards-(Cause)No Standards Exist (Solution)No Time to Deliver 100yr fix(Solution)
> 95%
Leaving only Unknown, Novel Issues of< 5%
}
}
60%SYSTEMATIC CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
03
You can join thecircle anywhere…..and you will end upback where you started!!
Try it…..
The Vicious Circle ofReactive Maintenance
WHY?
Can’t predict breakdowns
WHY?
No predictive or preventative maintenance
WHY?
No records, organised resources
or time
WHY?
Reacting to breakdowns
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
04
Breaking the Cycle with the‘100 year fix’
1. Operation2. “Defect” Occurs3. “Defect” is FixedOnly for the same thing to happen again….
21
3
FIX
DEFECTOPERATE
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
05
50
30
10 101015
50
25
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Reactive Breakdown
Preventive P.M's Predictive CBM Proactive Design-Out
%
Current Benchmark
Current vs. (say,3yr) Benchmark Maintenance Time Allocation
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
6
Self Assessment
In your own organisation
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
7
Maintenance Self Assessment
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
8
Score Range Actual Score of Delegate Groups
21 to 30
12 to 20
5 to 11
1 to 4
0
Benchmark Score for Your Company
TPM as a philosophy addresses each of these ten fundamental reasons forthe gaps in our existing Maintenance practices and recognises that it is theperson carrying out the tasks who is the key, and the way in which he orshe is supported is vital to achieve true cost effectiveness.
21 to 30 We have a major opportunity for improvement
12 to 20 We have significant scope for improvement
5 to 11 We are doing well, but can still gain some benefits
1 to 4 We are almost World Class
0 We are the World’s Best!!!
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
9
• It is the Users or Operators of Equipment, Machines and Processes who can catch the information on the status quo of an item and prevent it from breaking down and that without getting their co-operation, no proper maintenance or asset care can be established.
• Let’s take the example of a Driver (the Operator) of a Private Motor Car…………..
TPM Recognises a Simple Fact:-
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
10
• Other Conditions:L Steering Drag - (Touch & Eyes)L Wheel Bearing - (Hear)J Clutch Wear - (Touch & Hear)L Brake Wear - (Touch & Hear)L Exhaust - (Hear)J Engine Miss-Fire - (Hear & Touch)L Engine Overheat - (Smell)L Petrol Leak - (Smell)
• One Operator to Another:J Exhaust SmokeL Front/Rear LightsL Stop LightsL IndicatorsL Soft TyreL Rear Door not Shut
Front Line Operator Asset CareUsing Our Senses - Car Example
Not a single Spanner or Screwdriver involved in the above 27 Condition Checks. L = 17 of Them have Safety Implications
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
11
TPM is about Team-Work(The Football Team Analogy)
MANAGER/SUPERVISOR
TPMFACILITATOR
DESIGNERS &ENGINEER(S)
FINANCE& HR
QUALITY &PROD CONTROL
STEERINGGROUP
PRODUCTIONPROCESS
MAINTENANCETECHNICIAN
THE CORE TEAM
KEY CONTACTS
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
12
Four Cycle-11 Step TPM
ReviewPerformance
Criteria & History
Measurement & Opportunity
analysis of KPIs
(incl. OEE)
Equipment Criticality
Assessment
Condition Appraisal & Restoration
plan
Root cause Analysis &
Problem Resolution
Individual & Team Skill Development
Leadership & Behaviours
Audit & Review Process
MEASURECURRENT STATE & IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITY
CONDITION REVIEW(INCL. SAFETY ENERGY, & ENVIRONMENT)
PROBLEM PREVENTION &BEST PRACTICEROUTINES
FUTURE STATE REALISATION THROUGH A HABIT OF CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
Feed
back
A
B
C
D
Assess Hidden
Losses/wastes& Set
Improvement priorities
DevelopFuture Total Asset Care
Best Practice & Standard Work
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8
9 10 11
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
13
Effective Maintenance in the Lean Enterprise with a Future
DailyPrevention
MeasureDeterioration
Inject BeforeBreakdown
Routine ServiceCleanAdjustInspect
(Autonomous Maintenance
Monitoring&
Prediction(Condition Based
Monitoring)
TimelyPreventativeMaintenance
(Fixed Interval PM Schedules)
Healthy Equipment is like a Healthy Body!!
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
14
Four Cycle-11 Step TPM
ReviewPerformance
Criteria & History
Measurement & Opportunity
analysis of KPIs
(incl. OEE)
Equipment Criticality
Assessment
Condition Appraisal & Restoration
plan
Root cause Analysis &
Problem Resolution
Individual & Team Skill Development
Leadership &
Behaviours
Audit & Review Process
MEASURECURRENT STATE
& IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITY
CONDITION REVIEW
(INCL. SAFETY ENERGY, &
ENVIRONMENT)
PROBLEM PREVENTION &BEST PRACTICE
ROUTINES
FUTURE STATE REALISATION
THROUGH A HABIT OF CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
Feed
back
A
B
C
D
Assess Hidden
Losses/wastes& Set
Improvement priorities
DevelopFuture Total Asset Care
Best Practice & Standard Work
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8
9 10 11
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
15
• What Sources do we have? • How Comprehensive are they and… • How Trustworthy are they?• How useful are they at measuring OEE?• List and Rank them 1 to 5, where:-
– 1 is Poor, – 2 is Fair, – 3 is Adequate, – 4 is Very Good – 5 is Excellent
Step 1 - Sources of Information
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
16
Example STEP 1 Sources of Information 1 = Poor, 2= Fair , 3= Adequate, 4= Very Good, 5 = Excellent
Source HowComprehensive?
HowTrustworthy?
Howuseful re Calculating
OEE?
SAP 4 1 to 5 3 to 4-Possibily
Efficiency Files (AO1only) 3 3 No
Kissler Monitor (E14 only) 4 4 to 5 No
Operator Log Book 3 2 No
Maintenance Log Book 2 to 3 2 to 3 No
Tool History Log 3 to 4 3 to 4 No
Materials Handling Sy 3 5 D2D?
Robot History (E14 only) 3 Rarely Used No
OEM Manuals 4 to 5 2 Stds?
Operator Knowledge 1 to 5 1 to 5 No
Maintainer Knowledge 1 to 5 1 to 5 No
M/C History Single Page 1 5 Maybe?
SORT-Suspect Parts 4 4 No
Spares Usage 5 5 No
Daily Activity Sheet 3 to 4 3 to 4 2 to 3 redesign ?
Daily Management Board 3 1 to 5 No
Material Cycle Count 4 4 Stds?
Process Change Management 4 3 No
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
17
• 18 Different Sources of Information • Some Probable Duplications & Very Fragmented • Lot of Data- But very little Information• Should be subjected to the E,C,R,S test • Significant no: of 1’s,2’s or 3’s • Differences of opinion depending on Job Role• Can we extract OEE?-Possibly but will be cumbersome• Therefore need to design and Implement OEE Shift Log
Step 1 - Sources of Info ExampleSummary Conclusions
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
18
• What sources can we ELIMINATE• What sources can we COMBINE• What sources can we REPLACE with something
better• What sources can we SIMPLIFY and standardise
ECRS Test on sources of information
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
19
OEE
Step 2 - Level the pitch!
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
20
Four Cycle-11 Step TPM
ReviewPerformance
Criteria & History
Measurement & Opportunity
analysis of KPIs
(incl. OEE)
Equipment Criticality
Assessment
Condition Appraisal & Restoration
plan
Root cause Analysis &
Problem Resolution
Individual & Team Skill Development
Leadership &
Behaviours
Audit & Review Process
MEASURECURRENT STATE
& IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITY
CONDITION REVIEW
(INCL. SAFETY ENERGY, &
ENVIRONMENT)
PROBLEM PREVENTION &BEST PRACTICE
ROUTINES
FUTURE STATE REALISATION
THROUGH A HABIT OF CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
Feed
back
A
B
C
D
Assess Hidden
Losses/wastes& Set
Improvement priorities
DevelopFuture Total Asset Care
Best Practice & Standard Work
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8
9 10 11
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
21
Measuring Equipment EffectivenessFloor to Floor Losses
Overall Equipment Effectiveness =
Availability x Performance Rate x Quality Rate
● Idling & Minor Stoppages
● Reduced Speed Losses
§ Breakdowns
§ Change-Overs
● Scrap,Defect & Rework Losses
● Start up Losses
The 6 x Classic Equipment Based Losses-(Floor to Floor)
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
22
• ADOPT ? Maybe
• ADAPT ? Yes, Yes, Yes
• CORRUPT ? NEVER, NEVER, NEVER!!!
An OEE Health Warning !
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
23
A Wider Perspective of OEE
Floor to Floor Losses The 6 x Classic Equipment Based Losses
Vs
Door to Door‘Management’ Losses
Supply Chain ’Supplier to Customer’ Losses
Vs
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
24
The Value Stream and the OEE as an Enabler
65% M/C OEE(90%)
Classic 6 x Losses
FLOOR-TO-FLOOR OEE
55% DOOR-TO-DOOR EFFECTIVENESS (85%)
CustomersExternal Suppliers
45% “VALUE CHAIN” EFFECTIVENESS (80%)
Where (x%) = Target
y% = Actual
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
25
• Labour Co-ordination losses• Product Starvation• No Packaging Mats• Pre-Kitting Shortages• Consumable Stock outs• Planned PM’s Standard times• C/o Standard times • Awaiting QA Clearance Instructions
Typical Door to Door‘Management’ Losses
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
26
Important to recognise the differences
It’s important to recognise the different industry characteristics in for example , Process, Manufacturing, Packaging ,Utilities, Repair & Overhaul-especially (but not exclusively) in terms of :-
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
27
Important to recognise the differences
It’s important to recognise the different industry characteristics in for example , Process, Manufacturing, Packaging ,Utilities, Repair & Overhaul-especially (but not exclusively) in terms of :-
• OEE Measurement• Operator Impact on Performance• Maintainer Impact on Performance• 5S Work place Organisation• Changeovers
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
28
Recognising the differences
Facility OEE Measure Operator Impact
Maintainer Impact
5S -WPO Changeovers
Process Campaign or Batch OEE orFixed Repeatable Schedule (FRS)
Manufacturing Running Clock OEE
Utilities Relevance of OEE??
Repair & Overhaul Relevance of OEE??Pulse Line /FRS??
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
29
Recognising the differencesFacility OEE Measure Operator
ImpactMaintainer Impact
5S -WPO Changeovers
Process Campaign or Batch OEE orFixed Repeatable Schedule (FRS)
Significant Major
Manufacturing Running Clock OEE
Major Major
Utilities Relevance of OEE??
Very Little Major
Repair & Overhaul Relevance of OEE??Pulse Line /FRS??
Very Little Major
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
30
Recognising the differences
Facility OEE Measure Operator Impact
Maintainer Impact
5S -WPO Changeovers
Process Campaign or Batch OEE orFixed Repeatable Schedule (FRS)
Significant Major Significant(contamination control)
Significant re + CIP’s
Manufacturing
Running Clock OEE Major Major Major (to createFlow)
Major
Utilities Relevance of OEE?? Very Little Major ‘Housekeeping’Eng ‘Pride’
N/A?
Repair & Overhaul
Relevance of OEE??Pulse Line /FRS??
Very Little Major Major (to createFlow)
N/A?
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
31
Value StreamManager
Shift TeamLeaders
ManufacturingArea T/L& Team
Overall Supply Chain Efficiency
Factory “Door-to-Door”(D2D) OEE
Machine/LineOEE
The OEE as an Enabler for a Site Performance Contract at 3 x Levels of Responsibility
Site Performance “Contract”Top Down Target Driven Management,Bottom-Up Shift Team - Based Activity
Maximize Value Added & Eliminate WasteThrough OEE Measurement To Direct/Focus Action/ ImprovementTO
TopDown
Bottom Up
“Floor ToFloor”(F2F)
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
32
The SponsorVSM
The ‘Facilitator’Shift Team
Leader
The Do’ersShift Manufacturing
Team
Overall Supply Chain Efficiency
Factory “Door-to-Door” OEE
Machine/LineOEE
3 x Levels of Responsibilityfor Asset Effectiveness
The TPM “Contract”Top Down Target Driven Management,Bottom-Up Shift Team - Based Activity
Maximize Asset EffectivenessThrough OEE Measurement To Direct/Focus Action/ ImprovementTO
TopDown
Bottom Up
“Floor ToFloor”
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
33
Unit/OperationManager
(D2D)
Availability Performance Quality
Unplanned Supply failure LabourCoordination
* Schedule Adherence
Planned Planned outages(* inc. waiting)
* Processing Losses Planned Material Waste
Goal: Effective use of internal resources (Agile Enterprises)
Loss Map Structure
General Manager Supply Chain
(S2C)
Availability Performance Quality
Unplanned Production Plan changes
New Product/ Technology Losses
Late or incomplete deliveries
Planned * Spare capacity/Surplus inventory
*Transport/*Motion Losses
VOC/Specification Losses
Goal: Effective use of potential capacity (Time-based competition)
Manufacturing Area T/L & Team
Equipment(F2F)
Availability Performance Quality
Unplanned Breakdowns Idling and Minor Stops
* Defects and rework
Planned Set up and adjustment
Running at reduced speed
Start up Losses
Goal: Effective use of assets (Agile Operations)(* 7 Classic Lean Wastes)
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
34
• YOU CAN’T ALWAYS MEASURE ALL 3 COMPONENTS OF OEE – “WHAT GOES IN MUST COME OUT”– EITHER IT’S RUNNING, OR IT’S NOT!
Understand your Process Logic !!
=A) Yes Yes Yes
B) Yes No Yes
C) Yes No No
D) Yes Yes No
IF “NO” TREAT AS 100%
A P QX XOEE
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
35
Define your Units of Measure
•Always Use of Time•Always RelevantAvailability
•Weight Per Period•Units per Period•Line Speed
Performance
•Rejects -v- Rework•Weight or Units•Giveaway!
Quality
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
36
OEE Measurement & ResponsibilityExample Offshore Oil & Gas
FREQUENCY PARAMETER MEASURE RESPONSIBILITY PERSON
Monthly 1 Subsea Wells & Reservoir (ORE) APQ Owner Reservoir Engineer
Monthly 2 Field Management Effectiveness (OFE) APQ Owner Reservoir Engineer
Weekly `3 Effectiveness of Oil Plant (OPE) APQ Operator OIM
Weekly 4 Separation AQ Operator Production Supervisor
Weekly 5 Flare Minimisation P Operator Production Supervisor
Weekly 6 a) Gas Compression APQ Operator Production Supervisor
Weekly b) Overall Gas Compression System APQ Operator Production Supervisor
Weekly c) LP Eductor Equipment P Operator Production Supervisor
Weekly 7 Produced Water AQ Operator Production Supervisor
Weekly 8 a) Fuel Gas System APQ Operator Production Supervisor
Weekly b) Boilers A Operator Chief Engineer
Weekly 9 Water Injection APQ Operator Production Supervisor
Where The OEE =
A = Availability x P = Performance Rate When Running x Q = Quality Rate Produced
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
37
What Can it Deliver in Improved Overall Equipment Effectiveness
Steel Plant from 74% to 90%
Chemical Plant from 33% to 74%
White Goods from 79% to 88%
Automotive from 48% to 75%
Flour Mill from 88% to 96%
Filling Line (A) from 55% to 85%
Filling Line (B) from 68% to 80%
Packing Line(1) from 66% to 87%
Packing Line(2) from 50% to 70%
OEE is the main KPI of TPM
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
38
12 Months Average 2010
4 Wks Aver to 21 March 2011
4 Wks Aver to 30 Sept 2011
OEE 20.7% 44.2% 49.5%
Eq Failures 25.7% 16.0% 4.0%
Idle Time 38.0% 28.7% 21.5%
No Data 2.1% 0% 0%
Line Restraint 5.9% 0% 0%
Minor Stops 7.8% 5.7% 2.7%
Actual v. Target (Prod Plan)
73.0% 89.0% 100 %
Fill & Pack Line 6 Improvements(at Milestone 2 Achievement)
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
39
Myths & Realities of OEE
Myth:An OEE of 85% is World Class
Reality:It certainly is NOT
We didn’t let the Japanese finish their sentence !
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
40
World Class OEE
85% Is not a Golden Goal !
Look Inside OEE @ AV x PR x QR
Packing Line 80% x 96% x 97% = 75%
Flour Mill 98% x 99% x 99% = 96%
Product Cell 90% x 96% x 99% = 85%
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
41
Myths & Realities of OEE
Myth:OEE is a Management Tool to use as a benchmark
Reality:This misses the point of OEE as a practical manufacturing-floor problem solving tool
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
42
• Beware of not comparing like with like• Not just ‘Apples with Apples’ But ‘Bramleys with
Bramleys’!!!• Number and variety of product changes has big impact
on Availability• Who sets the Standards for Performance rates?
(Production Planning; Equipment Supplier or Engineering?)
• How big an impact does manning levels and skill levels have on cycle time?
• Are all minor stoppages recorded?• Are you measuring all aspects of quality including
packaging materials?
A Benchmarking Health Warning!Some ?’s to Ask Yourselves
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
43
Myths & Realities of OEE
Myth:OEE should be calculated automatically by computer
Reality:The computation approach is far less important than the interpretation. Whilst initially calculating or inputting manually you can be asking ‘why’ (before mechanising)
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
44
Myths & Realities of OEE
Myth:OEE on non-bottleneck equipment is unimportant
Reality:OEE provides a route to guide problem solving. The main requirement is for an objective measure of hidden losses even on equipment elsewhere in the chain especially if it is generating ‘controllable’ waste or non-value adding
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
45
Myths & Realities of OEE
Myth:We don’t need any more output, so why raise OEE
Reality:Management’s job is to maximise the value generated from the company’s assets. This includes business development. Accepting a low OEE defies commercial common sense
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
46
Myths & Realities of OEE
Myth:OEE is not useful because it does not consider planned utilisation losses and, for example labour co-ordination losses and material supply losses
Reality:OEE is one measure, but not the only one used. Others include productivity, cost, quality, delivery, safety, morale and environment. Often these ‘Door to Door’ Management losses (as opposed to Equipment, ‘Floor to Floor’ losses) are vitally important
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
47
Measuring Equipment EffectivenessFloor to Floor Losses
Overall Equipment Effectiveness =
Availability x Performance Rate x Quality Rate
● Idling & Minor Stoppages
● Reduced Speed Losses
§ Breakdowns
§ Change-Overs
● Scrap,Defect & Rework Losses
● Start up Losses
The 6 x Classic Equipment Based Losses-(Floor to Floor)
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
48
Why Change?
TRADITIONAL BLAMECULTURE
FINGER POINTING
FUTURE OEECULTURE
BUSINESS MEASURE
DOWNTIME = MaintenanceDept
PRODUCTION = ProductionSHORTFALL Dept
SCRAP = Quality Dept} AVAILABILITY %
x
PERFORMANCE RATE %
x
QUALITY RATE %} OVERALLEQUIPMENT
EFFECTIVENESS=
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
49
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
50
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
51
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
52
• Attendance or Loading Time = 100 Hours• Unplanned Downtime = 10 Hours
• During 90 Hours Runtime, Output Planned to be 900 Units
We actually processed 810 Units
• Of these 810 units processed only 729 were Goodor Right First Time
• What is our OEE score?
OEE- A Simple Example
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
53
OEE Worksheet
a Planned Runtime
b Actual Runtime BreakdownsSet-ups
Reduced SpeedMinor Stops
c Expected Output in Actual Runtime
d Actual Output
Expected Quality Outpute
f Actual Quality Output Scrap/ReworkStart-up Losses
OEE = b/a x d/c x f/e = %
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
54
OEE Worksheet Answer
a Planned Runtime
b Actual Runtime BreakdownsSet-ups
100 hrs
90 hrs
Reduced SpeedMinor Stops
c Expected Output in Actual Runtime
d Actual Output
900
810
Expected Quality Outpute
f Actual Quality Output Scrap/ReworkStart-up Losses
810
729
OEE = b/a x d/c x f/e = %90
x810
x729
----- ------- ----- = 73%100 900 810
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
55
OEE is Simple - Answer Explanation
Quality: 729 Units out of 810 Units
Availability: 90 hours out of 100 hours
Actual Expected
Performance: 810 Units out of 900 Units
Actual Expected
90x810
x729
----- ------- ----- = 73%100 900 810
x 100OEE =
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
56
Availability % Performance Rate % Quality Rate % OEE %
➲ Breakdowns➲ Set Ups/
Changeovers
➲ Running at Reduced Speed
➲ Minor Stops & Idling
➲ Scrap Rework➲ Start-up
Losses
Current 4 WksAverage OEE 80 90 97 70
4 Weeks Best of Best (BoB) 90 (Wk1) 95 (Wk3) 98 (Wk1& 4) 84
World Class 95 96 99 89
Self Assessment Example
Difference between Current Average & BoB is (14 / 70) x 100%= 20% Real improvement In Productive Capacity
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
57
Availability % Performance Rate % Quality Rate % OEE %
➲ Breakdowns➲ Set Ups/
Changeovers
➲ Running at Reduced Speed
➲ Minor Stops & Idling
➲ Scrap Rework➲ Start-up
Losses
Current 4 WksAverage OEE ? ? ? ?
4 Weeks Best of Best (BoB) ?? ?? ?? ??
World Class ??? ??? ??? ???
Self Assessment Format
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
58
• Worked example with teams
Best of Best Example
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
59
TEAM Current Average OEE
Best of Best OEE
World Class OEE
Weekly Value of BoB
& World Class
ULMA 3 Input
58% @168 hrs= 97.5 Prod hrs
73%122.5
81%136.0
+25.0 hrs / wk+38.5 hrs / wk
ULMA 3 Output
59% @168 hrs= 99.0 Prod hrs
75%126.0
85%143.0
+27.0 hrs / wk+44.0 hrs / wk
OEE Potential Benefit - Example
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
60
Four Cycle-11 Step TPM
ReviewPerformance
Criteria & History
Measurement & Opportunity
analysis of KPIs
(incl. OEE)
Equipment Criticality
Assessment
Condition Appraisal & Restoration
plan
Root cause Analysis &
Problem Resolution
Individual & Team Skill Development
Leadership &
Behaviours
Audit & Review Process
MEASURECURRENT STATE
& IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITY
CONDITION REVIEW
(INCL. SAFETY ENERGY, &
ENVIRONMENT)
PROBLEM PREVENTION &BEST PRACTICE
ROUTINES
FUTURE STATE REALISATION
THROUGH A HABIT OF CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
Feed
back
A
B
C
D
Assess Hidden
Losses/wastes& Set
Improvement priorities
DevelopFuture Total Asset Care
Best Practice & Standard Work
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8
9 10 11
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
61
Question 1: What is stopping us Achieving Best of Best Consistently?– Answer: We are Not in Control of the Six Big Losses– However:Best of Best has a High Belief Level. Therefore
Teamwork and Problem Solving will Lead to Elimination of the Six Big Losses.
Question 2 : What is each % point Improvement worth on OEE?– Answer: 20% Improvement in OEE is often equivalent to
100% of the annual maintenance budget
OEE Performance Measure
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
62
Step 3-Fishbone format for Assessing 6 Losses
AvailabilityRate
PerformanceRate
Qualityrate
BREAKDOWNS IDLING & MINOR STOPS YIELD, REWORK, SCRAP
X X
SET-UPSCHANGEOVERS
REDUCED SPEEDLOSSES
START-UPLOSSES
OEE
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
63
Boxes/reams reloaded onto line after stoppages
Broke trim
Box/paper jams in m/c’s
Step 3-Fishbone format for Assessing 6 Losses
AvailabilityRate
PerformanceRate
Qualityrate
IDLING & MINOR STOPS YIELD, REWORK, SCRAP
X X
SET-UPSCHANGEOVERS
REDUCED SPEEDLOSSES
START-UPLOSSES
Sensor Replacement -5 mins
Gripper rods breaking
Wait for craftsmen
Reel change - 24 minsRe-set gripper - 17 mins
Width curl (poor quality paper) - 165 mins
Manhandling of reels
Box Lid Jams -13 mins (5)
Ream label jams -10 mins (3)
Box label jams -11 mins (2)
Pemco jams - 8 mins (2)
6 reel instead of 4/8 reel runs
Running @ 18 instead of 20 reams/min to reduce jams
Restriction to 14 reams/minson involvo as chain slips
Pallets not full
Boxes damaged by robot
Approx. 1/2” off reel diameter when loading reel on back-stands
Damaged/poor quality paper
80% 90% 97%
70%
Downtime = 211 mins
Figures in brackets denote frequency of occurrence
(Lost production = 8.96 tonnes)
OEE
BREAKDOWNS
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
64
LabourMaterials/SparesOutside ServicesOverheads
ChangeoversSet up & Adjust
Idling & Minor Stoppages
Running at Reduced Speed
Breakdowns
Scrap,YieldsRework
Start-upLosses
Late Delivery
IneffectiveUse of Skills
Poor Image
Low Flexibility
Easy toMeasure
Low Impacton Profit
Difficult toMeasure
High Impact on Profit
The True Cost of Maintenance is7/8 Hidden…..
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
65
Labour Materials /SparesOutside Services Overheadssay €1m Revenue Budget
ChangeoversSet up & Adjust
Idling & Minor Stoppages
Running at Reduced Speed
Breakdowns
Scrap,YieldsRework
Start-upLosses
Late Delivery
IneffectiveUse of Skills
Poor Image
Low Flexibility
Easy toMeasure
Low Impacton Profit
Difficult to Measure High Impact on Profit
The True Cost of Maintenance is7/8 Hidden…..
60% OEE€ 50m Sales
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
66
You can be Very Efficient, but totally Ineffective!!
DCofM= € 1m
Sales at 60% OEE= € 50mSales at 72% OEE= € 60m€ 1m additional Margin (@10% on € 10m)20% increase in OEE=100% DCofM
(12 points =20% real increase inProductive Capacity)
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
67
You can be Very Efficient, but totally Ineffective!!
Efficiency
Effectiveness
Total Productive Maintenance
© 2016 The Leadership Network®
© 2016 Jidoka®
68
• If you cannot measure you cannot improve.
• Thoughts and reflections on OEE in your environment?
OEE