towards comparative research on openness dec. 12, 2013
DESCRIPTION
Open and openness has different meanings for different people. For example, there are a large number of open initiatives that fit within a broader "open movement" such as open access, open educational resources, open government data, and the like. While these initiatives use the term open, it isn't clear that they are necessarily referring to the same thing. In this presentation, I present one approach to thinking about the commonalities across open so that we can learn across openness in different silos.TRANSCRIPT
Greater Coherence Through an Openness
Theory of Change?3rd Global Congress on IP and the
Public Interest, Cape TownDec. 12, 2013
Matthew Smith, IDRC
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US.
Using the word ‘open’ brings challenges.
Challenge 1
Many definitions/uses of ‘open’
= poor discussions/learning
• ’
Challenge 2
Openness enacted and researched in silos
= re-invent the
wheel
= little cross-
learning
Challenge 3
Openness is understood by many as a good in and of itself.= lack of critical inquiry
General Objective
• Improve understanding of how, for whom, and in what circumstances does openness brings benefits and costs?
Specific Objectives
• Gain clarity as to what openness is and how ‘openness’ makes a difference
• Find a common denominator for comparative research
• Greater coherence across open movement
4
clarifications
Clarification 1
Functional openness
•Openness isn’t the goal•More openness ≠ better•Openness for a purpose
Open processes are always structured:
they include and exclude,
they close off possibilities.
Clarification 2
Clarification 3
Openness in theory ≠ Openness in practice
A critical perspective is required.
NOT:
Complete theory of open / openness
IS:
Simplified framework for comparison across open activities
Clarification 4
Methodology
• Inductive
• Open science/data/education research frameworks
• Other open literature• Looked for claims as to how
Openness adds value or cost
Fundamental questions
What is it about open that makes a difference?
What does openness enable that makes a difference?
2 Dimensions of Openness
• Openness of content
• Openness to people
Digitally Enabled
Open Content
• Free as in gratis (access)
• Free as in freedom
– open license
– 4 r’s: Reuse, Revise, Remix, Redistribute
Openness to People
~ more people = more open
Focus of ToC Model
What causal social processesdoes openness enable?
Focus of ToC Model
How do people do things (e.g., organize, collaborate, coordinate) around open content and/or
technology that
brings change?
Content
Time/cost investmentCost of hostingQuality content Democratization of knowledgeInstitutional Change
Causal Process Outcome
Creating &/or making content free &/or open(incl. redistribution)
Content
Attention/timeEnhanced capabilitiesIncreased AccessReduced duplicationReduced Costs
Causal Process Outcome
Use “as-is”(reuse)
Content
Change reputation (+/-)Build trustChange values
Causal Process Outcome
Interpretation by others of open initiatives
Content
Improvement of contentImprovement of processes
Causal Process Outcome
Transparency& feedback / accountability(reuse)
Content
Attention/timeImproved content (more relevant)Novel content
Causal Process Outcome
Adaptation(Revise/Remix)
Content
Improvement of content Novel content‘Communities’
Causal Process Outcome
Collaborative production(Revise/Remix)
(more) People
InclusionBuy-inLegitimacy
Causal Process Outcome
Participationin a decision making process
Participatory budgeting, new methods of participation in development initiatives
(more) People
Access to diverse mindsNew data sourcesNew/better solutions
Causal Process Outcome
Collective actionto achieve a goal
Digital activism, crowd-sourcing, sharing economy, collective intelligence, open competitions
Cross-cutting Research Questions
How, in what circumstances, and for whom does the as-is use add value, and what are the costs?
How, in what circumstances, and for whom does the adaptation add value, and what are the costs?
Benefits of Approach
• Clarifies differences between open activities
• Basis for deepening knowledge across disciplines
• Highly practical knowledge
• Connects openness to existing literature