towards an integrated approach for implementing the sdgs within national planning processes:...
TRANSCRIPT
Towards an integrated approach for implementing the SDGs within National
Planning Processes:
Cross-country Experiences of Integrated Approaches, Opportunities & Gaps in Africa
David SmithPEI Africa Manager, Poverty-Environment Initiative, Nairobi
Poverty-Environment Partnership 20th meetingEdinburgh, 27-29 May 2015
UNDP-UNEP POVERTY & ENVIRONMENT INITIATIVE (PEI): WHAT WE DO
The UNDP-UNEP PEI supports governments to:• Include pro-poor environmentally sustainable natural resource use as a
core objective in development planning & implementation
• Build capacity so that decision-makers know :– How pro-poor environmental sustainability contributes to
development &– How to include pro-poor environmental sustainability in development
planning & implementation.
• PEI regional programmes in Africa, Asia-Pacific, ECIS & LAC
• PEI Africa full country programmes in Mauritania, Mali, Burkina Faso, Rwanda, Tanzania, Malawi & Mozambique . Support to Kenya & Botswana
• Fully joint programme with joint UNDP-UNEP teams at global & regional level working through Government-UNDP Country Office teams at country level with regional PEI team support. Started in 2005.
PEI AFRICA: A PRACTICAL, PROVEN MODEL OF APPLYING AN INTEGRATED
APPROACH WITH MANY LESSONS FOR SDGS
• Integrated economic-social-environmental approach is the essence of PEI
• Relevance to SDGs identified by donors & countries
• Relevant in terms of– Programme content– Means of implementation– Monitoring, accountability & reporting
• Experiences & lessons reflect trial & error, ongoing learning & adapting – there is always room for improvement
• PEI increasingly requested to provide support to country discussions on how to implement the SDGs
INTEGRATED APPROACHES – KEY ELEMENTS IN PEI AFRICA COUNTRIES
• Integrated UN Support – UNDP & UNEP, using a fully joint programming approach: One UN in Action
• Integrated programme design at the country level focusing on country circumstances, development planning processes & priorities.
• Cross government approach: Planning/Finance, Environment & key ENR sectors (E.G. Agriculture)
• Focus on influencing Planning/Finance by demonstrating how sustainable ENR will help achieve economic & social development
• Five to ten years of UN support: Poverty-environment mainstreaming is a 10-20 year process of institutional change
• Catalysing the large resources for P-E investments from governments & donors.
KEY LESSONS
• PEI focus on integrating ENR sustainability & CC adaptation into Planning/Finance led development planning & budgeting process & into key Sector policies & plans because:– P/F set national development priorities & budgets– P/F have responsibilities for cross-sector links & broader cross-
government co-ordination– Sectors make the decisions that impact the most on environment– Environment Ministries usually lack capacity & status to m/s by
themselves.
• Yes, we want to build up capacity in Environment sector– But we need to convince key decision makers who set national &
sector priorities & budgets that ENR unsustainability & CC are also development problems.
– Then policies will be adopted & more funds will be allocated for ENR sustainability & CC adaptation.
• An active commitment to co-ordination & working together is vital – otherwise P-E m/s is a bureaucratically agonising process & likely to fail.
KEY LESSONS
• Carry out economic analyses to show how environmentally sustainable natural resource use can improve economic & social development. – Use very specific examples.
• Use non-market or informal values also – e.g. family fishing or fuel wood collection
– Use economic evidence tactically – e.g.• Briefing notes• Present evidence repeatedly in different meetings & working
groups
– Present good news as well as bad news – e.g. costs of unsustainability & benefits of investing more in sustainable ENR use and CC adaptation
KEY LESSONS• Support key sector policy & budgetary development processes to ensure
sustainability objectives operationalised
• Design mechanisms for long-term increases in budgets for ENR sustainability e.g.– Prepare Environment- Natural Resource Sector support programmes
for funding by major donors based in country
• Proactive, energetic use of PEI programme outputs is vital to generate change
• Ensure there is a substantive focus on summarising & communicating key messages according to audience– Prepare Policy briefs based on the key message– Repeat key messages over & over again targeting the specific
audience (Planners, ministers, parliamentarians, donors etc)
• Inclusion & application of p-e indicators in the national monitoring system vital
OPPORTUNITIES
• Applying PEI lessons to assist countries to set the SDGs into the national context (IE Domestication of SDGs).
• PEI country programmatic content relevant: – E.g. collection & application of economic & other evidence of the integrated
nature of environment-economic-social problems.
• PEI country programme means of implementation relevant: – E.g. Joint programming, cross-government, focusing on influencing national
development planning & their implementation processes.
• PEI country programme challenges provide guidance for implementation of SDGs – In identifying theory of change, developing & applying indicators to track
change– In ensuring an adequate focus on the poverty side of p-e m/s
GAPS/CHALLENGES
• P-E M/S Is a complex development policy problem – implementing the SDGs will be more complex. Complex problems require appropriate techniques to address them.
• Stronger political-economy support will be required compared with MDGs.
• Institutional co-ordination – horizontal & vertical - more important
• Capacity constraints
• Financial constraints
• Adequate monitoring SDG implementation & impact plus ensuring monitoring results are used to improve implementation will be very demanding
Thanks to our donors
wwwww.unpei.org