toward an eu strategy to defend our technological assets second panel interview. focus on defense...
TRANSCRIPT
Toward an EU strategy to defend our technological assets
Second panel interview. Focus on defense against misappropriation of technogical assets
Guillaume Capois – CSO EADS
4th September 2013 - Brussels
CS/SY
EU technological assets protection
Page 2
2013/09/04
Agenda
1 EADS specificities
2
3
4
5
Espionage / Cybercrime becomes the highest threat on Technological assets
Axes for protection (1): EU legal framework for technological asset protection
Axes for protection (2): Trust circle for sharing information
Axes for protection (3): European trusted tooling and providers for asset protection
6 Risks & Traps
Specificities of EADS reflect a large number of concerns of European Industries regarding the need to develop a EU harmonized strategy to protect technological assets
EU technological assets protection
Page 3
2013/09/04
Source: Mendiant 2013 threat report
Espionage is the main vector of misappropriation of Technological assets Among many technics and processes the one dramatically increasing is the
Cybercrime.
EU technological assets protection
Page 4
2013/09/04
Source: Ponemon Institute
Defense against misappropriation of technological assets includes various axes (1)
EU technological assets protection
Page 5
2013/09/04
Defense against misappropriation of technological assets includes various axes (2)
EU technological assets protection
Page 6
2013/09/04
Defense against misappropriation of technological assets includes various axes (3)
EU technological assets protection
Page 7
2013/09/04
Risks and traps to avoid
• Defense and support solutions to protect technological assets, (i.e. legal, technics ..) must be pragmatic and flexible enough and avoid any dogmatic approach which may disturb or endanger fair competitions and export, slow down or complexify business and innovation … The weight of the protection must not spoil agility and industrial speed.
• The political time of regulations and laws and the industrial time of innovation and business are traditionally far from aligned in pace, however while this unfolds, foreign parties interested in obtaining technological assets continue operating. Standstill means a loss of the assets.
• While working on a « European asset protection 2.0 », and by the time it is delivered, innovation and international competition might drive us into « 3.0 assets ». Any regulation must be ready to withstand the test of fast-paced innovation.
EU technological assets protection
Page 8
2013/09/04
Questions ?
EU technological assets protection
Page 9
2013/09/04