toric%20and%20multifocal%20gas%20permeable%20and%20soft ...the contacts you have now are a...
TRANSCRIPT
5/23/2016
1
Edward S. Bennett, OD, MS Ed, FAAO (Dipl), FSLSStephanie L. Woo, OD, FAAO, FSLS
Financial disclosures
Dr. Bennett:
Consultant to CLMA
Dr. Woo:
Biotissue
Blanchard contact lens
X-cel contacts
Visionary Optics
Alcon
Bausch and Lomb
Essilor contacts
Specialeyes
What are soft custom lenses?
Contact lenses designed for a truly custom fit
These designs feature:- smaller and larger diameters - wider range of curvatures- wide range of sphere and cylinder powers- exact cylinder axis- custom lens thickness
Custom toric contact lenses correct higher amounts of astigmatism than conventional soft toric lenses.Custom soft multifocals can provide patients with better vision than standard multifocals
5/23/2016
2
Current trends
Annual Contact Lens update 2012: Many large CL companies discontinued their
wider range of parameters (extended sphere and cylinder powers)
This left a huge need for soft custom lenses Custom torics offer us an opportunity to manage
astigmats in a highly precise way
Nichols, J. Contact Lens Update 2012. Contact Lens Spectrum. Jan 2012.
Custom Soft Torics
Recent studies have suggested that astigmats who are new wearers or previous contact lens dropouts achieve visual acuity comparable to spectacles when fitted with toric soft lenses
Specialty labs produce custom toric soft lenses with expanded parameters that the larger manufacturers are not currently offering.
Dr. Doug Benoit states, “These smaller labs have increased what we can do, so more patients are able to wear toric soft contact lenses than in the past.”
Cole, J. et al. Torics for astigmatism: soft and hard choice. Review of Optometry. July 2013
Candidates for soft custom lenses
High amounts of astigmatism Unhappy with their vision with their current
contact lenses Prescription in current CLs is not exact Lens rotation Fit issues
Good candidates for GP lenses, but concerned about comfort or unwilling to try
Astigmatic presbyopes! Multifocal options are becoming better
Those desiring the best vision
5/23/2016
3
Custom soft multifocals
Many labs offer new, innovative designs
Most need keratometry values, refraction, add power, eye dominance, HVID, and pupil size
Candidates for custom MF
Patients wearing soft MF with cy>1.00 D
Emerging presbyopes already wearing soft lenses
Monovision patients unsatisfied with vision
Patients wanting to try latest technology
Pros and Cons of Soft Custom Lenses
Pros of Soft Custom Torics Great vision Great fit No need to build up wear
time Stable – lens usually does not
pop out, even with vigorous activity
Truly custom lens Can correct large amounts of
astigmatism Can be an option for
presbyopes
Cons of Soft Custom Lenses Can be expensive
Vision may not be as good as GP lens
Lens replacement is usually quarterly/annually
Cost of lens if lost/damaged
5/23/2016
4
Rumpakis, J. New data on contact lens dropouts: an international perspective. Review of Optometry. Jan 2010
How to introduce custom soft lenses
If the patient is unhappy with the vision of their current contact lenses or how they feel, try explaining that a more custom lens may be more comfortable and produce better vision.
Example, “Jane, I see why your vision is not as sharp with your current contacts. The contacts you have now are a “one-size-fits all” – meaning that the shape of the lens only comes in one curve, and you may need another shape to fit your eye properly. Also, the standard contact lenses you are in correct most of your prescription, but not all of it. A more custom lens may fit your eye better and give you better vision.”
How to introduce custom soft lenses If a patient has a large amount of
astigmatism and has never worn contact lenses, but expresses interest:
Ex: “I think you are a great candidate for contact lenses. However, you have a large amount of astigmatism. It is more than most standard contact lenses have available. I would recommend a lens that corrects your entire amount of prescription and fits on your eye properly.”
5/23/2016
5
How are custom soft lenses designed?
Many manufacturers use some sort of fitting nomogram to design the lens
Prescribing Nomograms enable practitioners to quickly design custom soft contact lenses for patients with an average corneal diameter or horizontal visible iris diameter (HVID) of 11.6 to 12.0mm.
Ordering custom lenses is easy!
Many manufacturers only require keratometry values and refraction
For multifocals, you may need add power, eye dominance, and/or pupil size
Giving them Horizontal Visible Iris Diameter (HVID) can assist in providing an even more accurate lensNormal HVID: 11.6-12.00mm
5/23/2016
6
Keratometry
Refraction
Order!
Ordering is EASY!
Call the lab
Use online tools
So many ways to order!
Pricing
Custom soft lenses can have similar pricing! Ex: Tyler’s Quarterly: Frequency 55 Toric XR: unit cost $73.25 for 6 pack
= $146.50 for year supply SpecialEyes 54% custom toric: $28 for quarterly
lens = $112 for year supply Alden HP toric: year supply (quarterly lens) =$120 Keep in mind this is OUR cost – cost to pt will be
more, but prices are similar or better!
5/23/2016
7
Other benefits
Quick production and shipping! Customization allows for better vision and fit than
standard lenses Custom lenses CANNOT be ordered online or
through 1-800-_______ Patients can only order through your office
Patient retention Patients know you are on the cutting edge of
technology
Custom soft lenses for irregular astigmatism
Indications: Corneal ectasia ( keratoconus, PMD, etc)
Post refractive surgery
Post transplant
Intolerant to GP lenses
Poor handling with scleral lenses
How it works
Courtesy of Mark Andre and Pat Caroline
5/23/2016
8
Realistic expectations
Improved comfort compared to corneal GP lenses
Vision not as crisp as GP lenses
Fitting basics
Each design is fit a bit different, but the fitting guide is included in the fitting set
Centration and appropriate touch are important
Check for adequate movement and lens rotation
Tips on fitting and evaluation
After you order custom soft lenses, dispense the lenses in office – do NOT let patients take the lenses without checking vision and fit
Apply the lenses to the patient or have the patient apply the lenses
Pt ed “You’ve never worn these type of lenses before so they might feel a little strange; that is NORMAL”
Let settle for 5 minutes
5/23/2016
9
Tips on fitting and evaluation
After 5 minutes, assess vision OD, OS, OU (distance and near) and check the fit of the lenses
If vision is 20/30 or better and the fit is acceptable, dispense the lenses and have the patient follow up in 1-2 weeks.
If the vision is not acceptable, check the fit and over-refraction and report results to a consultant
Clinical Pearls
Custom soft lenses provide excellent vision and an excellent fit
Many manufacturers only require K’s and refraction = simple!
Cost can be similar or better than what they are currently wearing
Cannot order these anywhere but your office
Why not give our patients the best lens possible, a truly custom lens!
And when those soft lenses don’t work, there are always gas permeable lens options!
5/23/2016
10
GPS AND HIGH ASTIGMATISM
With > 2.00D corneal cylinder the following problems can occur with a spherical GP:
• Flexure
• Decentration
• Corneal Warpage
• Corneal Desiccation
• Lens Awareness
BACK TORIC
Determination of Base Curve Radii: (Mandell-Moore)
Corneal Cyl Flat Meridian Steep Meridian2.0 - 2.25D “On K” 0.50D Flat2.5 - 2.75D 0.25D Flat 0.50D Flat3.0 - 3.25D 0.25D Flat 0.75D Flat3.5 - 3.75D 0.25D Flat 0.75D Flat4.0 - 4.75D 0.25D Flat 0.75D Flat≥ 5.0D 0.25D Flat 0.75D Flat
BITORICS
When you correct for induced cylinder i.e., if 3.5 to 3.75D WTR cyl, add +1.75 x 180) on front surface, you have a bitoric design
Provides good centration; should fit like a spherical lens on low astigmatic cornea
Provides good vision Results in good corneal integrity When induced cylinder (only) is corrected, this
results in a spherical power effect
5/23/2016
11
EMPIRICAL METHODS
Mandell-MooreGPLI Toric and Spherical
CalculatorNewman Guide
Mandell-Moore Case Mandell-Moore Bitoric Lens Guide - Per eye
1 Keratometry
2 Spectacle Rx (Minus Cyl Form)
Flattest K Sphere Steepest K Sph + CylPower Power
3 Enter K4 Enter Spectacle Power
5 Vertex Adjust Line 4 6 Insert Fit Factor (-) (+) (-) (+)
Add Line 3&6 5&6 3&6 5&6
7 Final CL RxBase Curve Power Base Curve Power
Mandell-Moore Case
Corneal Cyl Fit Flat Meridian Fit Steep Meridian
2.0 Diopters On K (0 D) 0.50D Flatter
2.5 Diopters 0.25D Flatter 0.50D Flatter
3.0 Diopters 0.25D Flatter 0.75D Flatter
3.5 Diopters 0.25D Flatter 0.75D Flatter
4.0 Diopters 0.25D Flatter 0.75D Flatter
5.0 Diopters 0.25D Flatter 0.75D Flatter
Bitoric Lens Fit Factor
5/23/2016
12
Mandell-Moore Case Mandell-Moore Bitoric Lens Guide - Per eye
1 Keratometry 42.50 @ 180 46.00 @ 90
2 Spectacle Rx (Minus Cyl Form) - 4.00 – 4.00 x 180
Flattest K Sphere Steepest K Sph + CylPower Power
3 Enter K4 Enter Spectacle Power
5 Vertex Adjust Line 4
6 Insert Fit Factor (-) (+) (-) (+)
Add Line 3&6 5&6 3&6 5&6
7 Final CL Rx
Base Curve Power Base Curve Power
Mandell-Moore Case Mandell-Moore Bitoric Lens Guide - Per eye
1 Keratometry 42.50 @ 180 46.00 @ 90
2 Spectacle Rx (Minus Cyl Form) - 4.00 – 4.00 x 180
Flattest K Sphere Steepest K Sph + CylPower Power
3 Enter K 42.50 46.004 Enter Spectacle Power
5 Vertex Adjust Line 4
6 Insert Fit Factor (-) (+) (-) (+)
Add Line 3&6 5&6 3&6 5&6
7 Final CL Rx
Base Curve Power Base Curve Power
Mandell-Moore Case Mandell-Moore Bitoric Lens Guide - Per eye
1 Keratometry 42.50 @ 180 46.00 @ 90
2 Spectacle Rx (Minus Cyl Form) - 4.00 – 4.00 x 180
Flattest K Sphere Steepest K Sph + CylPower Power
3 Enter K 42.50 46.004 Enter Spectacle Power - 4.00 - 8.00
5 Vertex Adjust Line 4
6 Insert Fit Factor (-) (+) (-) (+)
Add Line 3&6 5&6 3&6 5&6
7 Final CL Rx
Base Curve Power Base Curve Power
5/23/2016
13
Mandell-Moore Case Mandell-Moore Bitoric Lens Guide - Per eye
1 Keratometry 42.50 @ 180 46.00 @ 90
2 Spectacle Rx (Minus Cyl Form) - 4.00 – 4.00 x 180
Flattest K Sphere Steepest K Sph + CylPower Power
3 Enter K 42.50 46.004 Enter Spectacle Power - 4.00 - 8.00
5 Vertex Adjust Line 4 - 3.75 - 7.25
6 Insert Fit Factor (-) (+) (-) (+)
Add Line 3&6 5&6 3&6 5&6
7 Final CL Rx
Base Curve Power Base Curve Power
Mandell-Moore Case Mandell-Moore Bitoric Lens Guide - Per eye
1 Keratometry 42.50 @ 180 46.00 @ 90
2 Spectacle Rx (Minus Cyl Form) - 4.00 – 4.00 x 180
Flattest K Sphere Steepest K Sph + CylPower Power
3 Enter K 42.50 46.004 Enter Spectacle Power - 4.00 - 8.00
5 Vertex Adjust Line 4 - 3.75 - 7.25
6 Insert Fit Factor (-) 0.25 (+) 0.25 (-) 0.75 (+) 0.75
Add Line 3&6 5&6 3&6 5&6
7 Final CL RxBase Curve Power Base Curve Power
Mandell-Moore Case Mandell-Moore Bitoric Lens Guide - Per eye
1 Keratometry 42.50 @ 180 46.00 @ 90
2 Spectacle Rx (Minus Cyl Form) - 4.00 – 4.00 x 180
Flattest K Sphere Steepest K Sph + CylPower Power
3 Enter K 42.50 46.004 Enter Spectacle Power - 4.00 - 8.00
5 Vertex Adjust Line 4 - 3.75 - 7.25
6 Insert Fit Factor (-) 0.25 (+) 0.25 (-) 0.75 (+) 0.75
Add Line 3&6 5&6 3&6 5&6
7 Final CL Rx 42.25 - 3.50 45.25 - 6.50
Base Curve Power Base Curve Power
5/23/2016
14
Step 7 +/- Fit Factor
-3.75
-8.00
-4.00 42.50
46.00-7.25
0.25 Fit Factor
0.75 Fit Factor
-3.50 42.25
-6.50 45.25
EMPIRICAL METHODS
Mandell-MooreGPLI Toric and Spherical
CalculatorNewman Guide
GPLI Toric and Spherical Lens Calculator: www.gpli.info
Toric and spherical lenses empirically designed
The toric calculator was designed by Dr. Tom Quinn (thank you to Todd Zarwell of Eyedock.com)
When you input refraction and K values it will design a spherical lens with ≤ 2D of corneal cylinder and a toric lens with > 2D of corneal cylinder
5/23/2016
15
-1.00
-4.00
Contact Lens
OAD: 9.2 mmtear lens
41.00
44.00
41.00
43.25
-1.00
-3.25
plano
-0.75
Rx: -1.00-3.00 X 180
K’s: 41.00/ 44.00 @ 090
Order:BC: 41.00 (8.23mm)/ 43.25 (7.80mm)BVP: -1.00/ -3.25
Difference in lens powers: 2.25D
Conclusion:Spherical Power Effect Design
Difference in base curve (D): 2.25 D
+0.25
-1.50
Contact Lens
OAD: 8.8 mm
43.00
45.25
Rx: +0.25 -1.75 x 180K’s: 43.00/46.00 @ 090
43.00
46.00
LENS DIAMETER BC/CORNEA RELATIONSHIP
HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Interm.(8.7-9.3mm) ON K 0.75 FTK
tear lens
plano
-0.75
+0.25
-1.50
Contact Lens
OAD: 8.8 mm
43.00
45.25
43.00
46.00
+0.25
-0.75
Difference in base curve (D): 2.25 DDifference in lens powers: 1.00 D
Conclusion: Since 2.25 D does not equal 1.00 D Cylinder Power Effect Design
Rotational Precautions:
1. Is there at least 2D of toricity in base curve?Yes (2.25D)
2. Is base curve toricity at least 2/3rds of corneal toricity?
Yes 3D (corneal toricity) x 2/3= 2D
Okay to order!
Rx: +0.25 -1.75 x 180K’s: 43.00/46.00 @ 090
5/23/2016
16
EMPIRICAL METHODS
Mandell-MooreGPLI Toric and Spherical
CalculatorNewman Guide
CYLINDER POWER EFFECT
• If the patient has residual astigmatism resulting in blurred vision with spherical OR, a cylinder power effect bitoric is recommended
• This lens must remain stable on the eye as any rotation could blur vision
5/23/2016
17
CPE EXAMPLE
Refraction/K’s +0.50 - 4.00 x 170; 42/45
DX SPE = 41.50/44.50, Pl/-3.00D
If VA = 20/30, perform Sph-Cyl OR
OR: +1.00 - 1.00 x 170 20/20
Add +1.00 to plano = +1.00D
Add Plano to -3.00 = -3.00D
Design a Bitoric GP Lens
Stop here!
This is all you need to order a lens
Your CLMA member laboratory can provide standardized parameters to complete the data
necessary for the posterior optical zone, peripheral curves, edge shape, center thickness and the anterior control of power and lens mass
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: TORIC PERIPHERAL CURVES
add 1mm to BCR for secondary curve radii
add 2mm to SCR for peripheral curve radii
5/23/2016
18
FINAL ORDER
Material: High Dk F-S/A
OAD: 9.4/8.2mm
BCR: 8.13/7.58mm
Powers: +1.00/-3.00D
CT = .19mm
SCR/W: 9.1/8.6 @ .3mm
PCR/W: 11.1/10.6 @ .3mm
POOR CANDIDATE
A difference of 15˚ or more between corneal cylinder axis and spectacle axis (irregular astigmatism)
SUMMARY
There are numerous innovations in GP materials, manufacturing, and surface quality
Use GPLI Toric and Spherical Lens Calculator, Mandell-Moore and/or SPE diagnostic set
GP Bitoric lenses can become your lens of choice in high astigmatic patients
There are many resources available to help you be successful
5/23/2016
19
GP MULTIFOCALS: WHY THEY ARE A GOOD OPTION IN 2016
RULE OF THREE’S
Number of Fits
Patient Consultation
Pre-Fit
Fitting
Problem-Solving
ASSESS MOTIVATION/GOALS
• What distance(s) is most important to them/goals? Rank Distance, IM, & Near
• Present all options (for their “chronological maturity”)
Advise PT about compromises with CL correction
Is motivation simply not to wear spectacles (cosmesis)
Do they desire their youth back???
5/23/2016
20
EXPLAIN DYNAMICS OF BIFOCAL GPS
If properly fit, they provide acceptable vision at distance and near
They move up and down during blink cycle (unlike spectacles)
They may experience transient blur with certain directions of gaze
Can the patient accept mild compromise in vision?
ADAPTATION/LENS CHANGES
Lens changes are the rule (1/eye initially, then 1/patient)
6 - 8 weeks to adapt
No Monday morning surprises
BOTTOM LINE
“If you are patient and motivated, there is an 80% success rate with these lenses.”
5/23/2016
21
PRE-FIT FACTORS
Pupil Size
Tear Film
Lower Lid Position/tightness
DESIGNS IN COMMON USE
Aspheric Multifocal
Concentric/Annular
Translating Segmented
ASPHERIC ADVANCEMENTS
Has evolved into a very popular type due to advancements in technology
New Technology resulting in better polished surfaces, & higher refractive index materials
Addition of higher add power lenses
Lower eccentricity lens designs
Translation???
5/23/2016
22
ASPHERIC CANDIDATES
Low - medium adds (Don’t R/O High)
Computer use
Athletes
Low lower lid &/or loose lids
Small-avg. pupil size
Critical Vision not essential
BACK SURFACE ASPHERIC MULTIFOCAL FITTING
Most designs fit 1 - 1.5D steeper than K
Must center with limited movement with the blink
Easy to fit via manufacturers’ fitting guide/user friendly
Good design to start with
Topographic Changes with Posterior Aspheric Lens Designs
Pre-Fitting Post-Fitting
5/23/2016
23
FRONT SURFACE ASPHERIC MULTIFOCAL DESIGNS
Have the benefit of avoiding back surface molding/topography changes
Example: Naturalens Progressive (Advanced Vision Technologies)
GoldenEye AFM (Valley Contax)
Magniclear & Renovations (Art)
Reclaim™HD (Blanchard)
ASPHERIC TROUBLESHOOTING
Inferior Decentration/Excessive Movement: Steeper Base Curve
Insufficient Add Power:
Select Higher Add Lens Design
Use “Modified Bifocal”
TRANSLATING VISION
Prism Ballasted & often Truncated
Crescent/Executive Seg
High Dk Material
Near image moves in front of pupil with downgaze
Typically rests on or near the lower lid
5/23/2016
24
Reading Position of Translating BifocalBase Curve Selection (courtesy Firestone Optics)
Proper base curve selection helps the lens to translate smoothly upward to position the seg line slightly above the pupil center during down gaze
TRANSLATING VISION: CANDIDATES
Critical vision demands
Any add powers (high add/limited IM)
Lower lid near limbus/good tonicity
Aspheric does not center
• Inferior Apex
FITTING NUGGETS
Diagnostic set(s) Follow manufacturer’s
fitting guide Trial Lens O/R. Translating Pearls:
Position of lower lid to limbus
Seg line to lower pupil position
Evaluate translation in downward gaze
5/23/2016
25
Lid Position
Optimal Okay ???
TRANSLATING VISION PROBLEM-SOLVING
Excessive Rotation
Lens Positions Too High
No Lens Translation
BLUR AT DISTANCE
Lens too high: Increase prism
Lens too low: Increase OAD
Seg Height is too high
Excessive movement
5/23/2016
26
BLUR AT NEAR
Seg height too low
No translation
Patient drops head to read, not eyes
Excessive lens rotation
RESOURCES
Your best resource is your laboratory consultant
They can can provide diagnostic fitting sets, online resources for the fitting and troubleshooting of their designs, and well as very good advice based upon extensive experience
If possible, topographies and photos can be beneficial as well
IN SUMMARY
Presbyopes represent the greatest opportunity for contact lens practice growth
For individuals desiring very little to any change in vision at all the distances, the presbyopic contact lens tool box should include GP lenses