too young to shine? nearby primordial starbursts fig. 2.— and the x-ray scaling ... ›...

1
Antara Basu-Zych 1,2 ; Mihoko Yukita 1,3 ; Panayiotis Tzanavaris 1,2 ; Bret Lehmer 4 ; Ann Hornschemeier 1 ; Tassos Fragos 5 ; Andreas Zezas 6 [email protected] Too Young to Shine? Nearby Primordial Starbursts and the X-ray Scaling Relations in the Early Universe 1 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center; 2 UMBC; 3 Johns Hopkins University; 4 Univeristy of Arkansas; 5 Geneva Observatory; 6 CFA/ Harvard The Sample: Ha Emitters (HAEs) We select our sample of nearby (z<0.1) “primordial” galaxies from the SDSS spectroscopic catalog with EW(Ha) > 500 Å, log [NII]/Ha <-1.0. Extreme emission-line galaxies selected in this way have been shown to have properties similar to high redshift galaxies (Shim & Chary 2013), e.g., low metallicities (Izotov+2011), hard- ionizing stellar spectra (Jaskot & Oey 2013), strong Lyman alpha emission (Henry+2015) and unusual optical emission line ratios (Steidel+2014). We use archival Chandra X-ray observations. Above: We show the optical images for our sample of nearby (z<0.1) “primordial” galaxies from SDSS u’ (blue), g’ (green), z’ (red) ordered by increasing star formation rate (SFR). Physical and angular sizes are given. The yellow X’s correspond to X-ray sources. Motivation: Measuring the X-ray emission from galaxies in the early universe — Do X-rays from the “first” galaxies contribute to the heating of the IGM? N E X X X X X X X X X Above: The X-ray emission from high mass X-ray binaries in star-forming galaxies depends on SFR and metallicity. Theoretically, weaker winds in low-metallicity galaxies result in more massive compact objects and higher X-ray luminosity (solid black line on left panel). However, many of the HAEs (red squares) and HeII galaxies (diamonds) have lower Lx/SFR than predicted based on their SFRs and metallicities. Brorby+2016 Are HAEs less X-ray luminous given their SFRs and metallicities? Is youth to blame? Below: We don’t see obvious trends between EW(Ha) and offset from X-ray- SFR-metallicity relation, but do find increased scatter at EW (Ha) > 500Å. * High mass X-ray binaries form fully over 10 Myr (burst) - 200 Myr (constant star formation history) timescales (see Rappaport+2005; Jusham & Schawinsky 2013). * Meanwhile, EW(Ha) > 500Å during stellar ages < 10 —100 Myr (see left). * Therefore, primordial galaxies might have lower X-ray luminosities given their SFRs and metallicities. Left: An Ha EW >500Å corresponds to very young ages (< 7 Myr or <70 Myr) depending on the star formation history (single burst vs. constant). At these young ages, high mass X-ray binaries have not fully formed (see Jusham & Schawinski 2013, Rappaport+2005)

Upload: others

Post on 05-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Too Young to Shine? Nearby Primordial Starbursts Fig. 2.— and the X-ray Scaling ... › symposium_2019 › posters › antara... · 2019-12-20 · We use archival Chandra X-ray

Antara Basu-Zych1,2; Mihoko Yukita1,3; Panayiotis Tzanavaris1,2; Bret Lehmer4; Ann Hornschemeier1; Tassos Fragos5; Andreas Zezas6

[email protected]

Too Young to Shine? Nearby Primordial Starbursts and the X-ray Scaling Relations in the Early Universe

1NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center; 2UMBC; 3Johns Hopkins University; 4Univeristy of Arkansas; 5Geneva Observatory; 6CFA/ Harvard

The Sample: Ha Emitters (HAEs)

We select our sample of nearby (z<0.1) “primordial” galaxies from the SDSS spectroscopic

catalog with

EW(Ha) > 500 Å,

log [NII]/Ha <-1.0.

Extreme emission-line galaxies selected in this way have been

shown to have properties similar to high redshift galaxies (Shim &

Chary 2013), e.g., low metallicities (Izotov+2011), hard-ionizing stellar spectra (Jaskot & Oey 2013), strong Lyman alpha

emission (Henry+2015) and unusual optical emission line

ratios (Steidel+2014). We use archival Chandra X-ray

observations.

Above: We show the optical images for our sample of nearby (z<0.1) “primordial” galaxies from SDSS u’ (blue), g’ (green), z’ (red) ordered by increasing star formation rate (SFR). Physical and angular sizes are given. The yellow X’s correspond to X-ray sources.

Motivation: Measuring the X-ray emission from galaxies in the early universe — Do X-rays from the “first” galaxies contribute to the heating of the IGM?

2

Fig. 1.— We display 3000⇥3000 images using public SDSS (Targets #1, 2, 3 and 4) z0, g0-, and u0-band and HST (Target #5) F775W,F435W, and SBC 150LP data for the red, green and blue channels, respectively. The circles correspond to the size of the Chandra PSF.

Fig. 2.— Recent studies show the importance of metallicity on the LX/SFR scaling.

[a] LX/SFR increases with decreasing metallicity (12+log[O/H]) for most galaxy populations: extreme-metal poor dwarf galaxies (greentriangles), LBAs (blue squares), and local star-forming galaxies (gray points). These points appear to follow the theoretical predictionbased on X-ray binary population synthesis models (Fragos et al. 2013a, black curve), rather than the local scaling relation with nometallicity-dependence measured by Mineo et al. (2012a, dashed line). [b] A revised X-ray luminosity scaling relation includes both SFR

and metallicity (Brorby et al. 2016). According to this relation, HAEs (black points) have lower LX (by > 1�) based on their SFRsand metallicities. Using an expanded sample of HAEs, shown by red arrows, we will study whether this relation holds for HAEs (withinstatistical variation) or needs to further account for galaxy age. [We use the same symbols in both panels.]

Fig. 3.—

Fig. 4.—

N

E

XX

X

XX XX

X

X

Above: The X-ray emission from high mass X-ray binaries in star-forming galaxies depends on SFR and metallicity. Theoretically, weaker winds in low-metallicity galaxies result in more massive compact objects and higher X-ray luminosity (solid black line on left panel). However, many of the HAEs (red squares) and HeII galaxies (diamonds) have lower Lx/SFR than predicted based on their SFRs and metallicities.

Brorby+2016

Are HAEs less X-ray luminous given their SFRs and metallicities?

Is youth to blame? Below: We don’t see obvious trends between EW(Ha) and offset from X-ray-SFR-metallicity relation, but do find increased scatter at EW (Ha) > 500Å. * High mass X-ray binaries form fully over

10 Myr (burst) - 200 Myr (constant star formation history) timescales (see Rappaport+2005; Jusham & Schawinsky 2013).

* Meanwhile, EW(Ha) > 500Å during stellar ages < 10 —100 Myr (see left).

* Therefore, primordial galaxies might have lower X-ray luminosities given their SFRs and metallicities.

Left: An Ha EW >500Å corresponds to very young ages (< 7 Myr or <70 Myr) depending on the star formation history (single burst vs. constant). At these young ages, high mass X-ray binaries have not fully formed (see Jusham & Schawinski 2013, Rappaport+2005)