to learn or to execute

2
To Learn or to Execute? That Is the Question By Vivek Prakash, PMP on April 19, 2013 12:19 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) If you've ever been in a corporate training session, chances are you've noticed fellow project managers coming in late, or not at all. The excuse is often, "There is so much pressure on the project that it's very difficult to make time for training." In my experience, project managers who choose work over training often expect the same from team members. So when a project is running, learning all but stops. But here's a thought: Upgrading skills and project execution can -- and should -- take place in tandem. Consider these two scenarios: 1. Project manager focuses on execution and ignores training 2. Project manager focuses on execution and training In today's fast-changing world, it is necessary to continuously upgrade skills beyond what you can learn on the job to overcome future challenges. In the first scenario, the project manager consistently misses opportunities to upgrade skills. After some time, the organization finds it difficult to provide better and more challenging assignments due to lack of skills. The organization will very likely lose a frustrated project manager. In the long term, both the organization and project manager are in lose-lose situation. In the second scenario, the project manager not only focuses on efficient execution but also prepares himself or herself and team members for current and future challenges. Due to time constraints, this is the hardest option for a project manager, but it's also the most rewarding. The key is developing a plan that combines learning and execution. For example, a project manager might enrol in a training session that pulls him or her away from the workplace. This forces the

Upload: srikanth-srinivas

Post on 10-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

To learn or to execute? That is the question

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: To Learn or to Execute

To Learn or to Execute? That Is the Question

By

Vivek Prakash, PMP

on April 19, 2013 12:19 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

If you've ever been in a corporate training session, chances are you've noticed fellow project managers coming in late, or not at all. The excuse is often, "There is so much pressure on the project that it's very difficult to make time for training."

In my experience, project managers who choose work over training often expect the same from team members. So when a project is running, learning all but stops. But here's a thought: Upgrading skills and project execution can -- and should -- take place in tandem.

Consider these two scenarios:

1. Project manager focuses on execution and ignores training

2. Project manager focuses on execution and training

In today's fast-changing world, it is necessary to continuously upgrade skills beyond what you can learn on the job to overcome future challenges. In the first scenario, the project manager consistently misses opportunities to upgrade skills. After some time, the organization finds it difficult to provide better and more challenging assignments due to lack of skills. The organization will very likely lose a frustrated project manager. In the long term, both the organization and project manager are in lose-lose situation.

In the second scenario, the project manager not only focuses on efficient execution but also prepares himself or herself and team members for current and future challenges. Due to time constraints, this is the hardest option for a project manager, but it's also the most rewarding. The key is developing a plan that combines learning and execution.

For example, a project manager might enrol in a training session that pulls him or her away from the workplace. This forces the project manager to delegate his or her tasks to team members. In turn, that gives team members an opportunity to lead during the project manager's absence -- and experiment and learn what they will do in future. The net result is a positive cascading effect that upgrades the skills of everyone on the project.

Here is a simple plan to get you started:

1. Evaluate your team members' roles and responsibilities -- yours included -- six months or one year down the line.

2. Identify the skills that are required to perform those roles and responsibilities.

3. Map the existing skills and identify the gaps for everyone on the team.

4. Prepare a training plan for each member.

Page 2: To Learn or to Execute

5. Build a main training schedule that addresses individual absences as team members complete their training. This schedule should plug in the skills gaps left by the absent team member.

With a firm training schedule, you and your team members can feel at ease to attend trainings. And since training sessions directly enhance skills for all roles, everyone can feed their newfound knowledge into the project.

Do you prioritize training over execution, or vice versa? How are you ensuring you advance your skills in the face of project work?