to increase consistency firm- wide pre-loaded color ... · 8/15/2012 · color palette use colors...

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010

Template Master – Update Tracking Number and Date Information Here Update tracking number and date on this slide

Color Palette

Use colors from the

pre-loaded color palette

to increase consistency

firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

1

Standard Body Slide This background is best for presentations made on-screen and may also need to be printed (best multi-purpose use)

Use Caution Make sure text/graphics do not

overflow onto the Shaw logo and

do not substitute the Shaw logo

for another

Erosion Mitigation And Shoreline

Management Feasibility Study

Town of Duck, North Carolina

Coastal Planning & Engineering of North Carolina

August 15, 2012

Tom Jarrett

Robert Neal

Ken Willson

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

2





for another

Outline:

• Review Goals of Study

• Phase 1 – Coastal Process/Erosion Impacts

• Phase 2 – Concepts/Cost/Timeline

• Results of Phase 1

• Shoreline Change Rates

• Trends/Reversals

• Pier Impacts

• Erosion Economics

• Phase 2 Concepts

• Develop an erosion mitigation strategy to address

this “Hot Spot”

• Develop a long term shoreline management

strategy for the entire Town

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

3





for another

Goals of the Study

• Evaluate shoreline changes along entire town

• Investigate the cause, extent, and severity of the chronic

erosion area or “Hot Spot” just north of the Research Pier

• Develop an erosion mitigation strategy to address this “Hot

Spot”

• Develop a long term shoreline management strategy for the

entire Town

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

4





for another

OUR APPROACH

• Develop Comprehensive Understanding of Coastal

Processes

• Project Shoreline Change Rates (5, 10, 15, 30, and 50

Years)

• Develop Short-Term and Long-Term Management

Alternatives to Address Erosion

Determine Permitting Costs

Potential Sand Sources

Construction Costs

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

5





for another

OUR APPROACH

• Develop Comprehensive Understanding of Coastal

Processes

• Project Shoreline Change Rates (5, 10, 15, 30, and 50

Years)

• Develop Short-Term and Long-Term Management

Alternatives to Address Erosion

Determine Permitting Costs

Potential Sand Sources

Construction Costs

PHASE 1

PHASE 2

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

6





for another

Phase 1: Coastal Process and

Shoreline Impact Analysis 1. Shoreline Change Rates

– What are the Shoreline Change Rates?

2. Trends or Reversals

– Should we expect past shoreline trends to remain constant or could

they reverse?

3. Pier Impacts

– Is the Pier impacting shoreline change rates?

4. Economic Losses Due to Shoreline Change Rates

– How much public and private property is threatened (Short-Term and

Long-Term)?

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

7





for another


Shoreline Impact Analysis 1: Shoreline Change Rates

• 11 LiDAR data sets between 1996 and 2011.

• Analysis extends from 1 mile south of Town through 1

mile north of Town.

• 543 Transects established (100 ft. Spacing)

• Transects grouped into 10 segments with similar trends

between 1996 – 2011

• Analysis extended back to 1940 using USGS data

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

8

Dark Background Body Slide This background is best for on-screen presentations only—the background shows up best on-screen but uses

excessive toner if printing copies




for another

Example of Shoreline Transects

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

9






for another

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

Jun-96 Jun-98 Jun-00 Jun-02 Jun-04 Jun-06 Jun-08 Jun-10

Cu

mu

lati

ve C

han

ge (

ft)

Date of LiDAR survey

Cumulative Shoreline Change since 1996-South of the FRF Pier

Seg 1 (-22000 to -14000) Seg 2 (-14000 to -8000) Seg 3 (-8000 to -6000) Seg 4 (-6000 to -2000) Seg 5 (-2000 to 0)

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

10






for another

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

Jun-96 Jun-98 Jun-00 Jun-02 Jun-04 Jun-06 Jun-08 Jun-10

Cu

mu

lati

ve C

han

ge (

ft)

Date of LiDAR survey

Cumulative Shoreline Change since 1996-North of the FRF Pier

Seg 6 (0 to 1000) Seg 7 (1000 to 6000) Seg 8 (6000 to 14000) Seg 9 (14000 to 16000) Seg 10 (16000 to 30000)

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

11






for another

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

Jan-40 Jan-50 Jan-60 Jan-70 Jan-80 Jan-90 Jan-00 Jan-10

Cu

mu

lati

ve C

han

ge (

ft)

Date of survey

Cumulative Shoreline Change South of FRF Pier Since 1940

Seg 1 Seg 2 Seg 3 Seg 4 Seg 5

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

12






for another

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

Jan-40 Jan-50 Jan-60 Jan-70 Jan-80 Jan-90 Jan-00 Jan-10

Cu

mu

lati

ve S

ho

relin

e C

han

ge (

ft)

Date

Cumulative Shoreline Changes North of FRF Pier Since 1940

Seg 6 Seg 7 Seg 8 Seg 9 Seg 10

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

13






for another

Shoreline Segment

Transect Grouping Distance From Pier (ft)

Average Shoreline Trend by Segment for 1996 to 2011

Overall Trend (ft/yr)

Total Movement (ft)

1 9 to 89 -22,000 to -14,000 0.67 10

2 89 to 149 -14,000 to -8,000 -0.37 -6

3 149 to 169 -8,000 to -6,000 1.81 27

4 169 to 209 -6,000 to -2,000 -1.04 -16

5 209 to 229 -2,000 to 0 -0.05 -1

6 229 to 239 0 to 1,000 -1.68 -25

7 239 to 289 1,000 to 6,000 -4.79 -73

8 289 to 369 6,000 to 14,000 1.1 17

9 369 to 389 14,000 to 16,000 -0.56 -8

10 389 to 529 16,000 to 30,000 1.53 23


Shoreline Impact Analysis 1: Shoreline Change Rates

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

14






for another

Dune Toe

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

15






for another

Comparison MHW Change to

Toe of Dune Change

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

16





for another

• Reviewed Wave Data from FRF and other gauges.

• Possibility of Sand Wave Migration.

• Influence of shore oblique sand bars


Shoreline Impact Analysis 2: Trends and Reversals

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

17






for another

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

18






for another

17.4 Meters / 57 Feet

FRF Pier

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

19





for another

Potential Monthly Sediment Transport Rates

Oct 1996 to Nov 2011 (Based on Gauge 3111)

-350,000

-250,000

-150,000

-50,000

50,000

150,000

250,000

350,000

Oct-96 Oct-98 Oct-00 Oct-02 Oct-04 Oct-06 Oct-08 Oct-10

Po

ten

tial

Mo

nth

ly A

lon

gsh

ore

Se

dim

en

t Tr

ansp

ort

(C

Y)

Date

Transport to South Transport to North

Dominate Littoral Transport to the North

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

20





for another

• Net northward sediment transport

• No clear correlation between wave data and shoreline

change based on LiDAR data sets

• No significant differences in average storm conditions

when comparing 1996 – 1999 and 1999 – 2011.

• No major difference in storm conditions from 1980 to

1996 compared to other time period.


Shoreline Impact Analysis 2: Trends and Reversals

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

21






for another

2: Shoreline Trends and Reversals

-10.0

-8.0

-6.0

-4.0

-2.0

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

10 110 210 310 410 510

Rat

e (

ft/y

r)

Transect

1940 to 1980 1980 to 1996 1996 to 2011

Southern Town Limit FRF Pier Northern Town Limit

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

22





for another


Shoreline Impact Analysis 3: Pier Impacts

• Analytical method to independently evaluate cross-shore

(EVEN) and alongshore (ODD) shoreline changes due to

potential obstruction.

• Cross-shore influences (storms) should impact the shoreline

about the same up-coast and down-cost of pier, hence EVEN

influence.

• Pier could potentially influence alongshore sediment transport

and cause unequal impacts up-coast and down-coast, hence

ODD influence.

• Cross-shore plus alongshore equals total shoreline response.

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

23





for another

Even Odd Analysis

1998 - 2008

Limit of Long-

Shore Influence

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

24






for another

Mean Sea Level

Mean Sea Level

Mean High Water


Shoreline Impact Analysis 4: Economic Losses Due To Shoreline Change Rates

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

25






for another

Mean Sea Level

Mean Sea Level

Mean High Water

40 ft.

Erosion Rate of 5 ft./ Year



Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

26






for another

Mean Sea Level

Mean Sea Level

Mean High Water


Apply 10 Years of Erosion



Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

27






for another

Mean Sea Level

Mean Sea Level

Mean High Water



5 ft./yr. X 10 years = 50 ft.



Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

28






for another

Mean Sea Level

Mean Sea Level

Mean High Water



5 ft./yr. X 10 years = 50 ft.



Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

29





for another



• 1996 – 2011 shoreline change rates were applied to the

existing dune toe

• Developed predicted dune toe position for 5, 10, 15, 30,

and 50-year timeframes

• Parcel value reduced based on percentage lost

• Structure considered “total loss” when the predicted dune

toe intersected or became landward of the structure.

• Pools $50K deduction from structural value

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

30






for another

Predicted Dune Toe Positions

2016 2021 2026

2046 2066

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

31






for another

Years Cumulative

2011-2016 2016-2021 2021-2026 2026-2041 2041-2061

Area Lost (acres) 52.03 3.26 3.28 9.96 13.41 81.94

Parcels Lost (US Dollars)

$72,617,984 $6,164,873 $6,168,610 $18,526,114 $17,937,543 $121,415,125

Building Affected 0 7 16 10 8 41

Pools Affected 7 10 0 0 3 20

Lost Infrastructure (USD)

$350,000 $3,163,900 $13,168,650 $9,518,950 $1,026,600 $27,228,100



Results from Phase 1

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

32





for another

Phase 2: Alternative Analysis

• What alternatives do we have that will mitigate erosion

damage to public and private property?

• What are the cost of implementing these alternatives?

• How long will it take to implement these alternatives?

• Considered economic value, innovative solutions, and

Town-wide benefits

Now That We Have Identified The Problem:

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

33





for another

• Develop a cost estimate for obtaining permits for the

project.

• Develop a schedule to obtain permits for the project

• Develop a cost and schedule associated with

Construction of the Project:

(Note: Town may want to consider continuing shoreline monitoring by FRF)


Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

34





for another

• No Action Alternative

• Erosion Mitigation Beach Fill Project

• Segmented Truck Haul Beach Fill

• Economic Impacts of Short Term vs. Long Term

Mitigation


Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

35






for another

Erosion Mitigation Beach Fill:

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

36






for another


Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

37






for another


Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

38






for another


Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

39






for another

Existing Geotechnical Information (Potential Borrow Sites)

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

40






for another

What About Impacts of Sea Level Rise?

= 1.35 ft/100 yrs

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

41






for another

Sea Level Rise

= 1.46 ft/100 yrs

Cumulative Nourishment Volume - Carolina Beach

0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

14,000,000

16,000,000

18,000,000

Dec-64 Dec-69 Dec-74 Dec-79 Dec-84 Dec-89 Dec-94 Dec-99 Dec-04 Dec-09

Nourishment Dates

Cu

mu

lati

ve

Vo

lum

e (

cu

bic

ya

rds

)

Cumulative Nourishment Volumes Linear (Cumulative Nourishment Volumes)

12 Nourishment Operations Since

Initial Construction in 1964-65 Annual

Nourishment =~300,000 CY/YR

Funding Gap 1971 to 1981

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

43






for another

Segmented Beach Fill (Truck Haul):

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

44






for another

CONVEYOR

SYSTEM:

Images Provided By: Eastman Aggregates Inc.

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

45





for another

• Look at Scale of Cost

• Look at any permanent infrastructure that could

make one of these more cost efficient

• Sustainability

Comparison Between Long Term

Projects

Truck Haul vs. Dredging Projects

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

46





for another

Types of Beach Fill Projects:

• Mitigate Long-Term Erosion

• Storm Damage Reduction

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

47






for another

Storm Damage Reduction

Before Fran (After Bertha)

After Fran

USGS

USGS

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

48






for another

Storm Damage Reduction

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

49






for another

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

PROFILE EVOLUTION OF BEACH NOURISHMENT

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 -200

DISTANCE

EL

EV

AT

ION

0

-10

-20

-30

10

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65


0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 -200

DISTANCE

EL

EV

AT

ION

0

-10

-20

-30

10

Nourishment

Design Beach

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65


0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 -200

DISTANCE

EL

EV

AT

ION

0

-10

-20

-30

10

Design Beach

Advance Fill

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65


0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 -200

DISTANCE

EL

EV

AT

ION

0

-10

-20

-30

10

Design Beach

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

010


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65


0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 -200

DISTANCE

EL

EV

AT

ION

0

-10

-20

-30

10

Post-Construction

Adjustment in 1-3 years

Design Beach

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

56






for another

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

57






for another

Approx. February 1993 Wet/Dry Line

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

58






for another


Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

59






for another


Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

60






for another

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

61






for another

Storm Vulnerability

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

62






for another

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

63






for another

SBEACH

• Storm-induced BEAch CHange Model

• Simulates cross-shore erosion of the dune,

berm, and foreshore caused by storm waves

and water levels

85M

1020

06D

Omaha Beach FS18 (Sta. 450+47)

100 Year Return Interval Storm Thule St

85M

1020

06D


100 Year Return Interval Storm

Post-Storm Profile

Thule St

85M

1020

06D

Beach Fill: Alternative 1 & 3



85M

1020

06D

Post-Storm Profile: Alternative 1 & 3



85M

1020

06D


100 Year Return Interval Storm

Post-Storm Profile

Thule St

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

71






for another

Summary

• Phase 1 analysis is generally complete, report being

prepared

• Concepts to be vetted for Phase 2 have been outlined

• Over the next 2 months we will finish Phase 2

• Recommend considering SBEACH analysis to

determine storm vulnerability for entire town

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

72






for another

Thank You For Your Time!!

Questions?

Tom Jarrett – [email protected]

Robert Neal – [email protected]

Ken Willson – [email protected]

Tra

ckin

g N

o.

00.

00.2

011


Color Palette

Use colors from the



firm- wide

R:0

G: 25

B: 73

R: 25

G:58

B:140

R: 57

G: 104

B: 170

R: 248

G: 152

B: 29

R: 119

G: 160

B: 66

R: 96

G: 129

B: 66

R: 241

G: 95

B: 35

R: 0

G: 147

B: 257

R: 17

G: 82

B: 65

73






for another

to increase consistency firm- wide pre-loaded color ... · 8/15/2012 · color palette use colors...

Documents