to backboard or not to backboard? spinal clearance protocols

34
To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols Will Smith, MD, EMT-P Medical Director Grand Teton National Park and Jackson Hole Fire/EMS, Jackson, WY www.wildmedconsulting.com

Upload: others

Post on 12-Sep-2021

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

To Backboardor Not To Backboard?

Spinal Clearance Protocols

Will Smith, MD, EMT-PMedical Director

Grand Teton National Park andJackson Hole Fire/EMS, Jackson, WY

www.wildmedconsulting.com

Page 2: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

ObjectivesDiscuss current standard of care and

protocols regarding spine injuries.Review research on spine injuries and

evaluation/treatment standards.How to implement spine assessment

protocols into your system.

Page 3: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Spinal Immobilization1960-70’s

EMS standards developedConsensus and Common Sense

Thought to be best practiceNow changing?

Page 4: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Who needs to be immobilized?

Page 5: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Even if they walked away from this?

Page 6: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Spinal ImmobilizationDo we immobilize for:

Mechanism of Injury?

Symptoms and/or Physical finding?

Page 7: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Spinal ImmobilizationLittle research

Never been shown to improve outcomesHauswald, Acad Emerg Med 1998Malaysia vs. New Mexico

Page 8: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Spinal ImmobilizationBUT - Standard of Care (in U.S.)

One of the most common EMS proceduresMillions of patients immobilized each yearNot necessarily in other parts of the world

Page 9: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Most Current EMS ProtocolsApply spinal immobilization to all

patients with potential for spine injurybased on mechanism of injury

If in doubt - IMMOBILIZE!

Page 10: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

The ResearchNo RCT to asses spinal immobilization

on trauma patient mortality, neurologicinjury, spinal stability, or adverse effectssustainedKwan, Cochrane Database 2001/2007 #2803

Page 11: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

The ResearchNEXUS

Hoffman, et. al. - NEJM, July 2000

Canadian C-Spine RuleStiell, et. al. - JAMA, Oct 2001

Page 12: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

NEXUSMajor Research - moves to a standard of

clinical spine clearance in emergencydepartments

Decreased imaging in 12.6 % (4,309 pts)N=34,069 patients

Page 13: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

NEXUS All 5 criteria met = No Xray

1. No midline cervical tenderness2. No focal neurological defect3. Normal alertness4. No intoxication5. No painful distracting injury

Page 14: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Canadian C-Spine RuleMajor Research -Slightly different protocol - more if/then

Age listed as a factorMechanism still plays a roleRange of motion of neck final test

Page 15: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

www.caep.ca

Page 16: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Malaysian /New Mexico Study5 yr retrospective chart review of 2

university hospitalsLess neurologic disability in

unimmobilized Malaysian patientsHauswald, Acad Emerg Med 1998

Disproves many theories that previouslyjustified widespread spine immobilization

Page 17: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Taking this to the field…Wilderness EMS

Rural EMS

Urban EMS

Page 18: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Wilderness EMSExtended Transport

2 hours to daysRisks of Spinal Immobilization

Decubitus ulcers, pt. discomfortAirway concerns - vomit, blood, etc.Extrication problems, rescuer risks

Risk vs. Benefit of Spinal Immobilization

Page 19: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Wilderness EMS

Page 20: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Wilderness EMSFocused Spine AssessmentAccepted protocol for Wilderness First

Responders (WFR)WMA, NOLS/WMI, SOLO

Risk vs. benefit of spinal immobilization

Page 21: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Rural EMSProlonged Transport

15 minutes to 1-2 hours

Pt. uncomfortable, no provider riskAirway concerns - vomit, blood, etc.Early stage 1 Decubitis Ulcers (redness)

Page 22: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Urban EMSRapid Transport

Less than 15 minutesPresent to emergency departments

Spine clearing protocolsNEXUS, Canadian C-Spine Rule

Xrays or CTs

Little risk to patients or EMS providersAirway concerns -vomit, blood, etc.

Page 23: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Flight EMSPatient’s cleared in referral ED’s by CT

and board certified EM physicians placedback on boards for transfer to traumacenters.

Page 24: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Why change what we’re doing?Patient ComfortAirway CompromiseBreathing CompromiseSkin CompromisePatient/Provider safety in certain settings

Page 25: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Some places have…MaineMichiganCaliforniaNational Park Service

Malaysia (by default)

Page 26: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Focused Spinal AssessmentProtocol Implementation

Review ResearchReferences are a startDo your own as well!

Medical Director / Medical ControlSupportCritical for success

Page 27: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Focused Spinal AssessmentProtocol Implementation

Review Established ProtocolsState of MaineNational Park Service

Page 28: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

State of Maine

www.maine.gov/dps/ems

Page 29: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

National Park Service

NPS EMS Field Manual, Version 02/05, Procedure 1150

Page 30: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Wilderness Medical Associates

www.wma.org

Page 31: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Focused Spinal AssessmentProtocol Implementation

Develop Protocol that works for yoursystemAge >65 get collar?Peds excluded?

Page 32: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Focused Spinal AssessmentProtocol Implementation

Good QA/QI programEducation of EMS ProvidersOngoing Review of Decisions and

Outcomes

Page 33: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

SummaryNot everyone with blunt trauma needs

spinal immobilization in the ED or in thefield

Selective immobilization can and shouldbe done by prehospital providers

Page 34: To Backboard or Not To Backboard? Spinal Clearance Protocols

Questions???

Copy of lecture noteswww.wildmedconsulting.com