t&l inset sept 2016

28
Teaching and Learning Focussing on student outcomes September 2016

Upload: petski

Post on 13-Feb-2017

52 views

Category:

Education


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: T&l inset sept 2016

Teaching and Learning

Focussing on student outcomes

September 2016

Page 2: T&l inset sept 2016

School Headline FiguresMeasure Total Percent

Students with 5 A*-C 108 54

Students with 5 A*-C incl E & M 90 45

Students with 5 A*-CIncl E, M & S

83 41.5

Page 3: T&l inset sept 2016

TOM: 11A* 1A BEN: 5A* 6A

Page 4: T&l inset sept 2016

AMELIA: 6A 3B LUCY: 3A* 4A 4B

Page 5: T&l inset sept 2016

….does not mean ‘children’

Page 6: T&l inset sept 2016

Requires improvement because…• The quality of teaching is inadequate. Too often work set does not

match students’ needs and abilities. Expectations are low and there is insufficient challenging work to enable students to do well.

• Subject leaders’ evaluations of the quality of teaching do not take enough account of the progress students make over time. As a result, leaders have an unrealistic view of the quality of teaching.

• The quality of teaching is inadequate. Teachers’ expectations of what students can achieve are low.

• Feedback is not consistent across all subjects. Comments that teachers make on students’ work are not helping them to improve. Teachers do not ensure that students correct their work.

• The most able students are not challenged sufficiently to think deeply about their learning.

Page 7: T&l inset sept 2016

Requires improvement because…• Leaders do not have high enough expectations of the academic standards that

students should achieve. Leaders have failed to ensure that teaching over time is good enough to improve achievement rapidly. Students, including disabled students or those who have special educational needs and the most able, underachieve because they do not make enough progress.

• The attainment and progress of disadvantaged students is declining and gaps in achievement between them and other students are growing.

• Teachers do not have high enough expectations of what students should achieve in lessons and so they do not plan activities that challenge students to think deeply and work hard. They are too accepting of insufficient or poorly presented work.

• Teachers’ assessments of students’ attainment are not accurate, so leaders cannot confidently use this information to make improvements.

• The quality of teachers’ marking and feedback to students varies from good to poor. In many books, marking does not help students to know how to improve their work.

Page 8: T&l inset sept 2016

Why were we placed in Special Measures?

Page 9: T&l inset sept 2016

School Headline FiguresMeasure Total Percent

Students with 5 A*-C 108 54

Students with 5 A*-C incl E & M 90 45

Students with 5 A*-CIncl E, M & S

83 41.5

Page 10: T&l inset sept 2016

SBL Teaching and Learning Policy

PlanTeachAssess

Feedback

Page 11: T&l inset sept 2016

SBL Teaching and Learning Policy

Plan: for all groups of students

Teach: for student outcomes

Assess: to identify areas for improvement

Feedback: to ensure understanding

Page 12: T&l inset sept 2016

1. What it’s for2. What we will do as an Academy3. What kind of learning we want to take place4. Expectations of staff, students and parents5. How teaching and learning will be monitored by

CTLs, HoH, SLT, tutors and governors6. How teaching staff will use the SE framework to

evaluate their own teaching and their students’ outcomes

SBL Teaching and Learning Policy

WE ALL NEED TO ADDRESS AND ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION:

Page 13: T&l inset sept 2016

Are students making progress in all their lessons?

• Progress checks (‘work scrutiny’)• Classroom visits (‘learning walks’)• Learning observations (‘lesson

observations’)• Student voice (‘student voice’)

Page 14: T&l inset sept 2016

Because if they are not making progress…

Page 15: T&l inset sept 2016

Clear guidelines around: 1. Effective lessons (the 8 principles)2. Planning, delivery and evaluation of

lessons3. Assessment and feedback4. Setting homework 5. Using the WMAT self-evaluation

framework

Page 16: T&l inset sept 2016

Academy Priorities for 2016-17

Page 17: T&l inset sept 2016

Core 4 programme

Page 18: T&l inset sept 2016

TLEG 10 workshops

Page 19: T&l inset sept 2016

IMPROVEMENT OF TEACHINGSUPPORT IN WEAKER AREAS OF TEACHING

DEVELOPMENT OF TEAMSLEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT

IMPROVED STUDENT OUTCOMES

BECAUSE professional development which does not have a strong focus on aspirations for students and does not assess the impact of changed teacher

practices on pupil learning is INEFFECTIVE

Page 20: T&l inset sept 2016

10 things that make a difference to student outcomes

1. QUALITY OF FEEDBACK 2. PRACTICE (CLASSWORK AND HOMEWORK)3. ACCESS TO MODELS OF EXCELLENCE4. HIGH EXPECTATIONS OF EACH CHILD5. AN UNDERSTANDING OF CONTEXT (FOR TEACHERS)6. META-COGNITION (FOR STUDENTS)6. HIGH LEVELS OF LITERACY7. STRONG RELATIONSHIPS AND CONSISTENT ADULT BEHAVIOUR9. ASPIRATIONAL MOTIVATION OVER 7 YEARS10. CAREFUL AND EFFECTIVE KEY STAGE TRANSITIONS

Page 21: T&l inset sept 2016

The importance of feedback

Page 22: T&l inset sept 2016
Page 23: T&l inset sept 2016
Page 24: T&l inset sept 2016

Feedback:

• #1 for impact on progress (EEF toolkit)• Must lead to progress over time• The value…lies not in marks in books but the

consistent quality of the feedback given to students

(SBL Staff Handbook 2016-17)

Page 25: T&l inset sept 2016

Demonstrating progress

• Overall results do not show a strong, improving trend

• We cannot wait until November to see if progress is improving

• Evidence of progress and learning is within the students’ work – the impact of feedback

• This must be evident from the very start and remain evident throughout

Page 26: T&l inset sept 2016

Giving feedback

• Written feedback– WWW– EBI

• Not all feedback needs to be written– Page 21 of staff handbook

Page 27: T&l inset sept 2016

“Feedback in books and folders will be monitored by CTLs, Middle Leadership Group, and line managers for its effectiveness in demonstrating progress over time, not for the frequency of acknowledgement, stickers, triple impact marking…”

Page 28: T&l inset sept 2016

Why were we placed in Special Measures?