title page with logo

40
Doctors & Patients on the Same Page! Joann G. Elmore, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine, Adjunct Professor of Epidemiology

Upload: phamanh

Post on 07-Feb-2017

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Title Page with logo

Doctors & Patients on the Same Page!

Joann G. Elmore, MD, MPHProfessor of Medicine,

Adjunct Professor of Epidemiology

Page 2: Title Page with logo

1. History of Medical Records

2. Prior Research on Medical Records and OpenNotes

3. Myths About OpenNotes and Electronic Medical

Records

4. Thinking About the Future….

OutlineDoctors and Patients on the Same Page

Page 3: Title Page with logo

The Doctor, by Sir Luke Fildes (1887)History

Page 4: Title Page with logo

Inside the Medical RecordWhat’s making my record so thick?

• Demographic information

• Clinic notes• Phone call notes• Medication List• Billing information• Allergies• Immunization record• Preventive care• Growth chart• Vital signs • Family medical history• Health problems• Lab test results• Radiology reports• Pathology reports• Notes from other

doctors

History

Page 5: Title Page with logo

2. Prior Research on Medical Records

Page 6: Title Page with logo

Electronic Health RecordsWV Slack et al NEJM 1966

“Neither the method of history taking and recording nor the

reliability and usefulness of the data collected has been studied as rigorously as the other tools of

clinical medicine…”

Page 7: Title Page with logo

Prior Research on OpenNotes

Began with a 3-institution study in 2010Harborview Medical Center, Seattle WABeth Israel Deaconess, Boston MA Geisinger, Danville PA

Now, a national movement with >6 million patients and thousands of doctors, nurses, therapists, etc. sharing notes

Funded primarily by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Page 8: Title Page with logo

Prior Research on OpenNotesOpenNotes Pilot Study

Research Design Pre/post survey of patients & doctors12 months of sharing notes>100 volunteer doctors>19,000 patients

(Delbanco et al., Ann Intern Med, 2012)

Page 9: Title Page with logo

Prior Research on OpenNotesOpenNotes Pilot Study

Study Questions

Does OpenNotes help patients become more engaged in their care?

Is OpenNotes the straw that breaks the doctor’s back?

After 1 year, will patients and doctors want to continue?

Page 10: Title Page with logo

Prior Research on OpenNotesWhat did we learn from the patients?

They report important benefits

They are not scared stiffThey want the notes

They read the notes

They share the notes

Page 11: Title Page with logo

Prior Research on OpenNotesThree out of four patients:

Felt more in control

Better recall

Improved understanding

Better prepared

Greater adherence to medicines

Page 12: Title Page with logo

Prior Research on OpenNotesDoctors’ Concerns about OpenNotes Impact on Workflow

Doctors’ Concerns Pre-Study Post-Study

More time addressing patient questions outside of visits

42% 3%

More time writing, editing notes 39% 11%

Page 13: Title Page with logo

Prior Research on OpenNotesThe Bottom Line After 1 Year

99% of patients wanted to continue accessing their visit notes online.

85% of patients said availability of OpenNotes would affect their future choice of providers.

Not one doctor asked to stop.

Page 14: Title Page with logo
Page 15: Title Page with logo

3. Myths about OpenNotes and Electronic Medical Records

Page 16: Title Page with logo

Myth Patients are not allowed to read their medical record.

Page 17: Title Page with logo

Myth Patients are not allowed to read their medical record.

www.uwmedicineecare.org

BUSTED!

Page 18: Title Page with logo

Myth Access is available to all patients, regardless of age.

Page 19: Title Page with logo

Myth Access is available to all patients, regardless of age. BUSTED!

Page 20: Title Page with logo

All doctors like electronic health records and are ready to share them with patients.

Myth

Page 21: Title Page with logo

All doctors like electronic health records and are ready to share them with patients.

Myth

“Should patients have access to their entire medical record ‒ including MD notes, any audio recordings, etc…?”

Over 2,300 physicians responded:34% ‒ Yes, always49% ‒ Only on a case-by-case basis17% ‒ No, never

(Dan Munro, Forbes.com June 2015)

BUSTED!

Page 22: Title Page with logo

Myth Your doctor has easy access to all of your records from multiple clinics.

Larissa
Needs a "busted"
Page 23: Title Page with logo

Myth Your doctor has easy access to all of your records from multiple clinics. BUSTED!

Different electronic health record systems often are not compatible

Clinicians do not always automatically receive test results from your other providers

Clinicians rely on patients to help

Larissa
Needs a "busted"
Page 24: Title Page with logo

Electronic health records are masterpieces.Myth

Page 25: Title Page with logo

Myth Electronic Health Records are masterpieces.

Address sensitive concerns directly Discuss what you write and write what you discuss

Typos and Transcription Errors “History of sick as hell disease” (sickle cell disease)

Example words and terms:- “Disheveled” - “Patient refused treatment” - “The patient comes in full peacock finery”- Acronyms such as “SOB,” “BS” - “Morbid obesity”- “Semi-athletic”

BUSTED!

Page 26: Title Page with logo

Myth The medical record will be easy to understand.

Page 27: Title Page with logo

Myth The medical record will be easy to understand.

“56 yo AA male is SOB today, but denies CP or LE edema. Cardiac exam obscured by loud BS. Had TTE 2 wks ago with LVEF 15% and nl valves. F/u with cards for likely cath and to discuss AICD. Continue diuretic blitzkrieg and check creatinine as my fear is that he’s getting pruned out.”

BUSTED!

Page 28: Title Page with logo

Patient name: John Doe

Harborview #: 1234567

Date of Visit: 03/05/14

LLL: 2+ MGD OUC/S: w/q OUK: 1+ MCE, tr stromal edema, 3-4+ guttae OUAC: d/q OUI: r/r OUL: 2+ NSC OU, 1+ PSC OSAV: Shafer negative Vit: PVD OD, syneresis OSON: 0.4 C/D OUMac: large drusen OU, GA OD, + CNVM c SRH OSV: unremarkableRet: LD temporally OU, no RT or RD

Myth The medical record will be easy to understand.

An Example Eye Clinic Note

BUSTED!

Page 29: Title Page with logo

Myth The medical record will be easy to understand.BUSTED!

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100%5%

10%15%20%

25%30%35%40%45%

Non-ophthalmologist Physicians' Understanding

of Eye Clinic Notes(n = 59)

Physician self-rating of level of understanding

Perc

ent

of p

hysi

cian

s

No Understand-ing

Perfect Under-standing

Page 30: Title Page with logo

Myth All abnormal test results are cause for alarm.

Page 31: Title Page with logo

Myth All abnormal test results are cause for alarm.

Example Lab in Patient PortalBUSTED!

Page 32: Title Page with logo

Myth All abnormal test results are cause for alarm.BUSTED!

“INCIDENTALOMAS”

Whole-body CT screening – findings detected in 37%Furtado et al., Radiology 2005

MRI Lumbar Spine – findings detected in 8.4% Park et al., AJR 2011

Page 33: Title Page with logo

Myth It’s easy to find reliable information on the web & TV.

Page 34: Title Page with logo

Myth It’s easy to find reliable information on the web & TV. BUSTED!

Any Evidence Dr. Oz Show The DoctorsEvidence Agrees 46% 62%

Evidence Disagreed 15% 14%

No Evidence to Support 39% 24%

Examination of medical TV show contentKorowynk et al BMJ 2014Information not balanced:

Magnitude of benefit (<20%)Potential harms mentioned (<10%)Cost (<15%)Conflict of interest (<1%)

Page 35: Title Page with logo

4. Thinking about the Future

Page 36: Title Page with logo

Thinking about the FuturePatient Safety

Page 37: Title Page with logo

Thinking about the FutureMedications Adherence

Page 38: Title Page with logo

Thinking about the FutureCaregivers

Page 39: Title Page with logo

Thinking about the FutureDoctor Patient Relationship

Page 40: Title Page with logo

Doctors and Patients on the Same Page!

[email protected]

THANK YOU TO OUR GENEROUS SUPPORTERS