title: ospi briefing on 2011 state assessment results and … · 2011. 9. 14. · 8/30/2011 | slide...
TRANSCRIPT
Prepared for the September 14-15 2011 Board Meeting
Title: OSPI Briefing on 2011 State Assessment Results and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) As Related To: ☐ Goal One: Advocacy for an effective,
accountable governance structure for public education ☒ Goal Two: Policy leadership for closing the
academic achievement gap ☐ Goal Three: Policy leadership to increase
Washington’s student enrollment and success in secondary and postsecondary education
☒ Goal Four: Effective strategies to make Washington’s students nationally and internationally competitive in math and science
☐ Goal Five: Advocacy for policies to develop the most highly effective K-12 teacher and leader workforce in the nation
☐ Other
Relevant To Board Roles:
☐ Policy Leadership ☒ System Oversight ☐ Advocacy
☐ Communication ☐ Convening and Facilitating
Policy Considerations / Key Questions:
This is the first year that assessment results have been determined by new SBE-approved cut scores for the 5th and 8th grade science Measurement of Student Progress and mathematics year one and two End-of-Course assessments.
Possible Board Action:
☒ Review ☐ Adopt ☐ Approve ☐ Other
Materials Included in Packet:
☐ Memo ☐ Graphs / Graphics ☒ Third-Party Materials ☐ PowerPoint
Synopsis: OSPI staff will present the recently released statewide Measurement of Student Progress and End-of-Course assessment results as well as an update on school and district Adequate Yearly Progress.
OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONDivision of Assessment and Student Information
State TestingOverview
forState Board of Education
September 15, 2011
Robin Munson, Ph.D. Asst. Supt., Assessment & Student Information
Alan Burke, Ed.D.
Deputy Superintendent
8/30/2011 | Slide 2
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
n
Topics for today’s discussion
Spring 2011 Assessment Results
Adequate Yearly Progress Results
Upcoming Assessment Activities 2011-12
Graduation Rates
Questions
8/30/2011 | Slide 3
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
nNew assessments for new learning standards
2008-09: New elementary & middle school math standards
First assessed on the math MSP in spring 2010
2009-10: New high school math standards
First assessed on math EOCs in spring 2011
2009-10: New K-12 science standards
Elementary and middle school standards to be first assessed on science MSP in spring 2011
High school standards to first be assessed on the biology EOC in spring 2012
8/30/2011 | Slide 4
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
n
State testing – Spring 2011
2nd year of new math standards in grades 3-8
2nd year of shorter tests in reading, math, science (not writing)
First year of end-of-course math exams
Expanded online testing to grades 4-5 in reading and math and grades 5 and 8 in science
8/30/2011 | Slide 5
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
n
2011 MSP/HSPE ResultsDifference in percent meeting standards, 2010 to 2011
Reading Math Writing Science
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8
Grade10 EOCs
1.0
0.1
-2.0
6.0
-7.0
-0.8
3.4
-0.3
5.6
7.6
6.9
1.6
-1.3
0.3
0.7
0.0
21.6*
7.0*
4.6
* New science standards tested in grades 5 and 8
8/30/2011 | Slide 6
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
nReading MSP/HSPE: Grades 3-8 and 10Percent of students meeting standard
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s m
eetin
g st
anda
rd
73.167.3 67.6 70.6
56.468.6
82.3
0
20
40
60
80
100
Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 Gr. 6 Gr. 7 Gr. 8 Gr. 10
47.9%in ’97
38.4%in ’98
51.4%in ’99
’09 ’10 ’11
8/30/2011 | Slide 7
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
n 61.4
71.0
86.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
Gr. 4 Gr. 7 Gr. 10
Writing MSP/HSPE: Grades 4,7 and 10Percent of students meeting standard
42.8% in ’97
31.3% in ’98
41.1% in ’99
’09 ’10 ’11
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s m
eetin
g st
anda
rd
8/30/2011 | Slide 8
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
n 61.5 59.3 61.2 58.8 56.950.3
0
20
40
60
80
100
Gr. 3 Gr. 4 Gr. 5 Gr. 6 Gr. 7 Gr. 8
Math MSP: Grades 3-8Percent of students meeting standard
21.4%in ’97
20.1%in ’98
’09 ’10 ’11
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s m
eetin
g st
anda
rd
8/30/2011 | Slide 9
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
n
High school math testing changes
In Spring 2011, students took end-of-course exams in algebra 1 and geometry
2011 results set new baseline for math EOCs
Comparisons to previous years are inevitable, but not apples to apples because of new tests and new standards
Need at least three years of data to determine effectiveness of new math standards
8/30/2011 | Slide 10
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
n
2011 End-of-course Math ResultsPercent meeting standards in 2011
Year 1 (Alg/Int 1)
Percent Number
Grades 6-7 94.5% 5,599
Grade 8 83.8% 27,473
Grade 9 57.5% 46,555
Grade 10* 60.8% 46,452
Grade 11 58.3% 20,313
Grade 12 41.1% 6,715
Total 66.2% 153,107
* All Grade 10 students tested on an EOC for AYP
8/30/2011 | Slide 11
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
n
2011 End-of-course Math ResultsPercent meeting standards in 2011
Yr 1 EOC Alg 1
Yr 1 EOC
Integ 1
Yr. 1 Makeup
Year 1 EOC Total
Grades 6-7 94.3% 97.4% 99.1% 94.5%
Grade 8 82.0% 88.2% 97.3% 83.8%
Grade 9 53.7% 48.4% 87.8% 57.5%
Grade 10* 30.7% 26.8% 71.4% 60.8%
Grade 11 33.4% 27.2% 63.3% 58.3%
Grade12 25.9% 36.8% 43.3% 41.1%
Total 60.7% 55.4% 74.4% 66.2%
* All Grade 10 students tested for AYP purposes
8/30/2011 | Slide 12
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
n
2011 End-of-course Math ResultsPercent meeting standards in 2011
Year 2 (Geom/Int 2)
Percent Number
Grades 6-7 99.5% 213
Grade 8 98.3% 4,770
Grade 9 91.2% 21,045
Grade 10* 66.3% 31,930
Grade 11 44.1% 7,177
Grade 12 31.3% 1,465
Total 73.8% 66,600
* All Grade 10 students tested on an EOC for AYP
8/30/2011 | Slide 13
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
n
2011 End-of-course Math ResultsPercent meeting standards in 2011
Yr 2 EOC
Geom
Yr 2 EOC
Integ 2
Yr. 2 Makeup
(not given)
Year 2 EOC Total
Grades 6-7 99.4% 100% 99.5%
Grade 8 98.3% 99.3% 98.3%
Grade 9 91.0% 93.2% 91.2%
Grade 10* 66.6% 63.2% 66.3%
Grade 11 45.1% 34.1% 44.1%
Grade12 31.7% 21.2% 31.3%
Total 74.2% 69.3% 73.8%
* All Grade 10 students tested for AYP purposes
8/30/2011 | Slide 14
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
nElementary and Middle School Science testing changes
In Spring 2011, grades 5 and 8 MSP tested students on new science learning standards
2011 results set new baseline for science MSP
Comparisons to previous years are inevitable, but not apples to apples because of new test and new standards
Need at least three years of data to determine effectiveness of new science standards
8/30/2011 | Slide 15
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
n 55.661.5
49.7
0
20
40
60
80
100
Gr. 5 Gr. 8 Gr. 10
Science MSP/HSPE: Grades 5,8 and 10Percent of students meeting standard
28.2% in ’0435.8% in ’03
31.8% in ’03
’09 ’10 ’11
New standards Old standards
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s m
eetin
g st
anda
rd
8/30/2011 | Slide 16
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
nMSP results, by ethnic groupReading, 4th grade, 2009-11
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s m
eetin
g st
anda
rd
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
2009 2010 2011
Amer Ind
Asian
Black
Hispanic
White
Pac Islander
Multi
8/30/2011 | Slide 17
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
nMSP results, by ethnic groupMath, 4th grade, 2009-11
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s m
eetin
g st
anda
rd
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
2009 2010 2011
Amer Ind
Asian
Black
Hispanic
White
Pac Islander
Multi
8/30/2011 | Slide 18
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
nMSP results, by ethnic groupReading, 8th grade, 2009-11
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s m
eetin
g st
anda
rd
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
2009 2010 2011
Amer Ind
Asian
Black
Hispanic
White
Pac Islander
Multi
8/30/2011 | Slide 19
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
nMSP results, by ethnic groupMath, 8th grade, 2009-11
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s m
eetin
g st
anda
rd
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
2009 2010 2011
Amer Ind
Asian
Black
Hispanic
White
Pac Islander
Multi
8/30/2011 | Slide 20
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
nProgress toward Certificate of Academic or Individual Achievement
Percent of each cohort meeting standard
READING Class of 2010 Class of 2011 Class of 2012 Class of 2013
After 10th grade 81.24 79.54 78.23 81.18
After 11th 88.94 88.63 88.48
After 12th 94.82 94.47
WRITING Class of 2010 Class of 2011 Class of 2012 Class of 2013
After 10th grade 85.48 84.31 83.82 83.8
After 11th 90.94 90.59 90.37
After 12th 94.82 94.56
MATH Class of 2010 Class of 2011 Class of 2012 Class of 2013
After 10th grade 51.08 45.85 43.68 63.9
After 11th 59.56 57.18 67.13
After 12th 70.76 62.05
Earned CAA/CIA Class of 2010 Class of 2011 Class of 2012 Class of 2013
After 10th grade 48.54 43.16 39.93 57.72
After 11th 67.1 57.74 63.36
After 12th 68.91 63.82
8/30/2011 | Slide 21
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
n
Schools not meeting AYP, 2006-2011N
umbe
r of s
choo
ls
338
757
1,268 1,285
1,147
1,388
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
8/30/2011 | Slide 22
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
n
0
20
40
60
80
100
'02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14
ESEA requirementsMinimum percentages needed to meet AYP, grade 10
48.6
61.5
74.3
87.2
100.0
24.8
43.6
62.4
81.2
ReadingMath
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s m
eetin
g st
anda
rd
8/30/2011 | Slide 23
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
n
AYP results for schools, 2011
DID NOT MEET AYP1,388 schools(64.0 percent)
MET AYP770 schools
(36.0 percent)
8/30/2011 | Slide 24
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
n
Changes to state testing - 2012
Online testing Starting grade 3 in reading and math More online participation needed
New end-of-course biology exam
More restricted access to Collection of Evidence as alternative for meeting graduation requirements
New English Language Proficiency Assessment
Revised WAAS-Portfolio (significant cognitive challenges)
8/30/2011 | Slide 25
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
nGraduation RatesOn-Time and Extended, 2004-2010
70.1%
76.5%74.3%
82.6%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
2004 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s gr
adua
ting
ExtendedOn-time
8/30/2011 | Slide 26
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
nGraduation RatesOn-time and extended, by ethnicity, 2009-2010
79.4%
58.0%
66.9%
66.7%
57.0%
84.9%
76.5%
84.9%
66.7%
76.2%
76.9%
63.6%
90.6%
82.6%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Caucasian
Native American
Hispanic
Black
Pacific Islander
Asian
All Students
Percent of students graduating
Extended On-time
8/30/2011 | Slide 27
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
n
Based on National Governors’ Association formula: # of graduates/incoming 9th graders (+/- transfers)
Requires tracking individual students (SSIDs)
Required for AYP, for all states, in Aug 2012
OSPI will report new rate on Aug 30, 2011
New graduation rate calculations
8/30/2011 | Slide 28
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
n
2008‐2009 2009‐2010
Old On‐time Graduation Rate 73.5% 76.5%New On‐time Graduation Rate 71.6% 72.7%Difference ‐1.9% ‐3.8%
Old Extended Graduation Rate 79.2% 82.6%New Extended Graduation Rate N/A 80.7%Difference N/A ‐1.9%
Impact of change to graduation calculations
8/30/2011 | Slide 29
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
nOn-time and Extended Graduation Rates by Ethnicity for 2009-2010
29
8/30/2011 | Slide 30
OFF
ICE
OF
SUPE
RIN
TEN
DEN
T O
F PU
BLIC
INST
RU
CTI
ON
Div
isio
n of
Ass
essm
ent a
nd S
tude
nt In
form
atio
n
More details can be found-
OSPI Report Card: http://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us
Data files: http://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us/DataDownload.aspx
State testing and graduation requirements handouts: http://www.k12.wa.us/Resources/default.aspx