time for first principle... for economic education

Upload: silberksouza

Post on 14-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Time for First Principle... for Economic Education

    1/2

    ANYTHINGPEACEFUL

    Tim e for First Pri nciples and Gr owthOCTOBER18,2013 by JAYBOWEN

    With gross federal outstanding debt poised t o pierce $17 trillion, an entit lement crisis that includes over $80 trillion in unfunded

    liabilities, 47 million people on food stamps, and 16 percent of the population living in poverty, it has become clear t hat our current

    system is now broken in terms of its ability to effect substantive policy change.

    Like children wit h virtually no self-control, lawmakers, in a great show of reckless bipartisanship, have put the nation in a precarious

    fiscal position.

    Thishorrid backdrop is only being made worse by the current recovery, which has indeed been a slog. In fact, what w as once thought

    to be a transitory sluggishness has taken on the feeling of permanence, characterized by growth rates significantly below our long-term average. After all, the difference between 3.3 percent growth (the U.S. average between 1929 and 2012) and a 2 percent rate is

    40 percent less output, employment, and production. This economic performance gap damagesour standard of living a litt le more

    with each passing quarter. Over the last four he gap has actually been even worse: Real growth has only averaged 1.6 percent.

    Policies do influence economic behavior and payroll decisions, and the unprecedented increase in both part-t ime and t emporary

    workersd uring this recovery is corporate Americas att empt t o circumvent a plethora of burdensome government-mandated cost

    increasest hat are reaching lofty heights this year with the implementation of the 906-page Affordable Care Act, which continuest o

    spawn thousands of pages of regulations. As Wayne Crews of the Competitive Enterprise Instit ute recently pointed out, this costs the

    U.S. economy around $1.8 tri llion a year, which is slightly more than Canada s entire 2011 GDP, and acts as a major disincentive for

    capital formation, job creation, and overall economic vibrancy. As the accompanying chart demonstrates, the 1980s recovery wast he

    antit hesis of the current expansion on a variety of sensitive economic fronts, wit h tax and regulatory burdensfalling substantiallyduring the former era.

    This tepid environment is also expressing itself through a falling labor-force participation rate, which is close to historic lows, meaning

    the unemployment rate is declining primarily because people are simply dropping out of the labor force. That's an unprecedented

    trend during a recovery, as are the stagnant wages we're seeing and the virtual nonexistence of business investment.

    In this connection, the Fed s hyperaggressive and unprecedented monetary actionshave not returned us to a sustainable trend-

    growth path, as quarter after quarter and now year after year, the economy seems to have fallen into a perpetual state of

    underperformance from both growth and price-stability standpoints. A variety of negative consequences could flow from these

    actions, particularly concerning inflation and malinvestment.

    Thus, it is time to marshal outside forcest o inject discipline into the equation. Anyone who thinks differently only need glance at t he

    current fatuous debate over raising the debt ceiling. The most logical path at t his point would be a constit utional convention, where

    more rules-based approach could be contemplated on a variety of issues, including term limits, a monetary price rule, and tax and

    spending limitations.

    This path would not require congressional involvement, as the will of the people, via the enthusiastic actionsof 34 state legislatures

    (two-thirds of the states) would mandate such an event. Thiswould be consistent with the long and storied t radition of strengthenin

    our system of government t hrough the amendment process. I am supremely confident t hat the Founding Fathers would agree that

    we have reached ap oint in our nation s history that makes this approach essential to the long-term viability of our republic.

    A version ofthis article appeared in theAtlanta Business Chronicle.

    SHARETHIS

    ABOUT RELATED

  • 7/27/2019 Time for First Principle... for Economic Education

    2/2

    JAY BOWEN

    Jay Bowen is a FEEt rustee and president of Bowen, Hanes & Co.

    Inc., an Atlanta investment counseling firm. A version of this piece

    wasoriginally published Jan. 11, 2013, in Atlanta Business

    Chronicle.

    How In flat ion Br eeds RecessionMARCH 01,1975 by HENRYHAZLITT

    Risk an d Business Cycles: New and Old Au stri an

    Perspectives

    Ist he Austrian Theory of the Business Cycle Impl ausible?SEPTEMBER01, 1998 by LELAND B. YEAGER

    Copyright 2013 Foundation for Economic

    Education. All RightsReserved.