thursday, february 16, 2017 - iowa legislature...des moines, iowa, thursday, february 16, 2017 the...

PROOF

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STATE OF IOWA

House Journal

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2017

Produced daily by the State of Iowa during the sessions of the General Assembly.

(The official bound copy will be available after a reasonable time upon adjournment.)

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

39th Day THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2017 319

JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE

Thirty-ninth Calendar Day - Twenty-sixth Session Day

Hall of the House of Representatives

Des Moines, Iowa, Thursday, February 16, 2017

The House met pursuant to adjournment at 8:53 a.m., Speaker

Upmeyer in the chair.

Prayer was offered by Pastor Ryan Jorgenson, Harvest Bible Chapel,

Grimes. He was the guest of Highfill of Polk.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Blessed Maria Middle School

students from Waterloo. They were the guests of Brown-Powers of Black

Hawk.

The Journal of Wednesday, February 15, 2017, was approved.

ADOPTION OF HOUSE RESOLUTION 6

Hagenow of Polk called up for consideration House Resolution 6,

a resolution recognizing February 17, 2017, as the 175th anniversary

of Iowa Wesleyan University.

Heaton of Henry moved the adoption of House Resolution 6.

The motion prevailed and the resolution was adopted.

RULE 67 INVOKED

(Time Certain)

Hagenow of Polk moved that a time certain be set for the close of

debate and that the House act on all amendments filed to House File 291

no later than 12:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 16, 2017 and then

immediately proceed to a substitution, if available, and closing remarks,

then final passage on the bill under consideration.

Hunter of Polk rose on a point of order.

https://www.legis.iowa.gov/legislation/BillBook?ga=87&ba=HR6



https://www.legis.iowa.gov/legislation/BillBook?ga=87&ba=HF291

320 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 39th Day

Hunter of Polk moved to amend the motion for time certain at 12:00 p.m.

on February 23, 2017 and final remarks on all amendments.

Hunter of Polk moved to amend the amendment to the motion for

time certain at 12:01 p.m. on February 23, 2017 and final remarks on

all amendments.

Roll call was requested by Hunter of Polk and M. Smith of Marshall.

On the question "Shall the amendment to the amendment to the

motion for time certain at 12:01 p.m. on February 23, 2017 and final

remarks on all amendments be adopted?" (H.F. 291)

The ayes were, 40:

Abdul-Samad Anderson Bearinger Bennett

Breckenridge Brown-Powers Cohoon Dolecheck

Finkenauer Forbes Gaines Gaskill

Hall Hanson Heddens Hunter

Isenhart Jacoby Kacena Kearns

Kressig Kurth Lensing Mascher

McConkey Meyer Miller Nielsen

Oldson Olson Ourth Prichard

Smith, M. Smith, R. Staed Steckman

Taylor, T. Thede Wessel-Kroeschell Wolfe

The nays were, 54:

Bacon Baltimore Baudler Baxter

Bergan Best Bloomingdale Carlin

Carlson Cownie Deyoe Fisher

Fry Gassman Grassley Gustafson

Hagenow Hager Hanusa Hein

Highfill Hinson Holt Holz

Huseman Jones Kaufmann Kerr

Klein Koester Landon Lundgren

Maxwell McKean Mohr Mommsen

Moore Nunn Paustian Pettengill

Rizer Rogers Salmon Sexton

Sheets Taylor, R. Vander Linden Watts

Wheeler Wills Windschitl Worthan

Zumbach Speaker

Upmeyer

Absent or not voting, 6:

Forristall Heartsill Heaton Running-Marquardt

Sieck Winckler

The motion lost.



Hunter of Polk moved to amend the motion for time certain at

12:00 p.m. on February 23, 2017 and final remarks on all amendments.


On the question "Shall the amendment to the motion for time certain

at 12:00 p.m. on February 23, 2017 and final remarks on all amendments.

be adopted?" (H.F. 291)

The ayes were, 39:


Breckenridge Brown-Powers Cohoon Finkenauer

Forbes Gaines Gaskill Hall

Hanson Heddens Hunter Isenhart

Jacoby Kacena Kearns Kressig

Kurth Lensing Mascher McConkey

Meyer Miller Nielsen Oldson

Olson Ourth Prichard Smith, M.

Smith, R. Staed Steckman Taylor, T.

Thede Wessel-Kroeschell Wolfe

The nays were, 56:



Carlson Cownie Deyoe Dolecheck

Fisher Fry Gassman Grassley

Gustafson Hagenow Hager Hanusa

Heaton Hein Highfill Hinson

Holt Holz Huseman Jones

Kaufmann Kerr Klein Koester

Landon Lundgren Maxwell McKean

Mohr Mommsen Moore Nunn

Paustian Pettengill Rizer Rogers

Salmon Sexton Sheets Taylor, R.

Vander Linden Watts Wheeler Wills

Windschitl Worthan Zumbach Speaker

Upmeyer


Forristall Heartsill Running-Marquardt Sieck

Winckler

The motion lost.

T. Taylor of Linn rose on a point of order.



T. Taylor of Linn moved to amend the motion for time certain at

12:02 a.m. on February 18, 2017.

Roll call was requested by T. Taylor of Linn and M. Smith of Marshall.

On the question ""Shall the amendment to the motion for time

certain at 12:02 a.m. on February 18, 2017 be adopted?" (H.F. 291)

The ayes were, 39:










Thede Wessel-Kroeschell Wolfe

The nays were, 56:











Paustian Pettengill Rizer Salmon

Sexton Sheets Sieck Taylor, R.



Upmeyer


Forristall Heartsill Rogers Running-Marquardt

Winckler

The motion lost.

Hagenow of Polk moved that a time certain be set for the close of

debate and that the House act on all amendments filed to House File 291

no later than 12:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 16, 2017 and then




immediately proceed to a substitution, if available, and closing remarks,

then final passage on the bill under consideration.

Roll call was requested by T. Taylor of Linn and Hunter of Polk.

On the question "Shall time certain be set at no later than 12:00 p.m.

on Thursday, February 16, 2017?" (H.F. 291)

The ayes were, 58:




Fisher Fry Gaines Gassman

Grassley Gustafson Hagenow Hager

Hanusa Heaton Hein Highfill

Hinson Holt Holz Huseman

Jones Kaufmann Kerr Klein

Koester Landon Lundgren Maxwell

McKean Mohr Mommsen Moore

Nunn Ourth Paustian Pettengill

Rizer Salmon Sexton Sheets

Sieck Taylor, R. Vander Linden Watts

Wheeler Wills Windschitl Worthan

Zumbach Speaker

Upmeyer

The nays were, 37:



Forbes Gaskill Hall Hanson

Heddens Hunter Isenhart Jacoby

Kacena Kearns Kressig Kurth

Lensing Mascher McConkey Meyer

Miller Nielsen Oldson Olson

Prichard Smith, M. Smith, R. Staed

Steckman Taylor, T. Thede Wessel-Kroeschell

Wolfe


Forristall Heartsill Rogers Running-Marquardt

Winckler

The motion prevailed.

Hagenow of Polk asked and received unanimous consent to resume

consideration of House File 291.




CONSIDERATION OF BILL

Regular Calendar

The House resumed consideration of House File 291, a bill for an

act relating to employment matters involving public employees

including collective bargaining, educator employment matters,

personnel records and settlement agreements, city civil service

requirements, and health insurance matters, making penalties

applicable, and including effective date, applicability, and transition

provisions, previously deferred.

Hunter of Polk offered amendment H–1031 filed by him.

Windschitl of Harrison in the chair at 9:52 a.m.

Kressig of Black Hawk offered amendment H–1099, to amendment

H–1031, filed by him.

Mascher of Johnson rose on a point of order under Rule 10,

decorum in debate.

The Speaker ruled the point not well taken.

Kressig of Black Hawk moved the adoption of amendment H–1099

to amendment H–1031.

Roll call was requested by Kressig of Black Hawk and Abdul-Samad

of Polk.

Rule 75 was invoked.

On the question "Shall amendment H–1099, to amendment H–1031,


The ayes were, 40:









https://www.legis.iowa.gov/legislation/BillBook?ga=87&ba=H1031











Thede Wessel-Kroeschell Winckler Wolfe

The nays were, 57:












Salmon Sexton Sheets Sieck

Taylor, R. Upmeyer, Spkr. Vander Linden Watts

Wheeler Wills Worthan Zumbach

Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall Heartsill Running-Marquardt

Amendment H–1099, to amendment H–1031, lost.

Kaufmann of Cedar rose on a point of order under Rule 10, decorum

in debate.

The Speaker ruled the point well taken.

Kressig of Black Hawk rose on a point of order under Rule 10,

decorum in debate.

The Speaker ruled the point not well taken.

Kaufmann of Cedar rose on a point of order under Rule 10, decorum

in debate.

The Speaker ruled the point well taken.

Wills of Dickinson in the chair at 11:26 a.m.

Windschitl of Harrison in the chair at 11:56 a.m.




The Speaker announced that time certain having come to pass, all

amendments will now be put to the question.

Hunter of Polk moved the adoption of amendment H–1031.



On the question "Shall amendment H–1031 be adopted?" (H.F. 291)

The ayes were, 41:








Olson Ourth Prichard Running-Marquardt


Taylor, T. Thede Wessel-Kroeschell Winckler

Wolfe

The nays were, 58:






Heartsill Heaton Hein Highfill





Nunn Paustian Pettengill Rizer

Rogers Salmon Sexton Sheets

Sieck Taylor, R. Upmeyer, Spkr. Vander Linden

Watts Wheeler Wills Worthan

Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall

Amendment H–1031 lost.






Finkenauer of Dubuque offered amendment H–1091 filed by her

and moved its adoption.




The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall












The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall







T. Taylor of Linn offered amendment H–1095 filed by him and

moved its adoption.




The ayes were, 42:







McKean Meyer Miller Nielsen


Running-Marquardt Smith, M. Smith, R. Staed


Winckler Wolfe

The nays were, 57:















Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall







Wessel-Kroeschell of Story offered amendment H–1024 filed by her





The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall







Wessel-Kroeschell of Story offered amendment H–1025 filed by her





The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall








moved its adoption.




The ayes were, 43:




Hanson Heaton Heddens Hunter



McConkey McKean Meyer Miller

Nielsen Oldson Olson Ourth

Prichard Running-Marquardt Smith, M. Smith, R.

Staed Steckman Taylor, T. Thede

Wessel-Kroeschell Winckler Wolfe

The nays were, 56:






Heartsill Hein Highfill Hinson



Landon Lundgren Maxwell Mohr

Mommsen Moore Nunn Paustian

Pettengill Rizer Rogers Salmon

Sexton Sheets Sieck Taylor, R.

Upmeyer, Spkr. Vander Linden Watts Wheeler

Wills Worthan Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall


Brown-Powers of Black Hawk offered amendment H–1028 filed by

her and moved its adoption.










The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall


Kacena of Woodbury offered amendment H–1032 filed by him and

moved its adoption.









The ayes were, 42:


Best Breckenridge Brown-Powers Cohoon









Winckler Wolfe

The nays were, 57:


Bergan Bloomingdale Carlin Carlson

Cownie Deyoe Dolecheck Fisher


Hagenow Hager Hanusa Heartsill










Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall


Nielsen of Johnson offered amendment H–1033 filed by her and

moved its adoption.








On the question “Shall amendment H–1033 be adopted?” (H.F. 291)

The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall



moved its adoption.











The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall


Kearns of Lee offered amendment H–1035 filed by him and moved

its adoption.









The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall


McConkey of Pottawattamie offered amendment H–1036 filed by

him and moved its adoption.









The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall


Forbes of Polk offered amendment H–1037 filed by him and moved

its adoption.









The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall


Wolfe of Clinton offered amendment H–1043 filed by her and

moved its adoption.









The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall


Bearinger of Fayette offered amendment H–1055 filed by him and

moved its adoption.









The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall



moved its adoption.









The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall



its adoption.









The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall


Hall of Woodbury offered amendment H–1066 filed by him.

Hall of Woodbury offered amendment H–1097, to amendment H–1066,

filed by him and moved its adoption.



On the question “Shall amendment H–1097, to amendment H–1066,

be adopted?” (H.F. 291)









The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall


Hall of Woodbury moved the adoption of amendment H–1066.










The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall


Lensing of Johnson offered amendment H–1079 filed by her and

moved its adoption.









The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall


Staed of Linn offered amendment H–1080 filed by him and moved

its adoption.









The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall



moved its adoption.









The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall


Hunter of Polk offered amendment H–1023 filed by him and moved

its adoption.









The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall



moved its adoption.









The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall


Running-Marquardt of Linn offered amendment H–1044 filed by










The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall


Bennett of Linn offered amendment H–1051 filed by her.

Finkenauer of Dubuque offered amendment H–1104, to amendment

H–1051, filed by her and moved its adoption.










The ayes were, 42:











Winckler Wolfe

The nays were, 57:





Hagenow Hager Hanusa Heartsill










Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall


Bennett of Linn moved the adoption of amendment H–1051.













The ayes were, 42:





Jacoby Jones Kacena Kearns






Winckler Wolfe

The nays were, 57:















Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall












The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall



moved its adoption.









The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 58:















Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding


Forristall


Kearns of Lee offered amendment H–1039 filed by him.

Kearns of Lee offered amendment H–1100, to amendment H–1039,











The ayes were, 42:











Winckler Wolfe

The nays were, 58:




Forristall Fry Gassman Grassley











Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding

Absent or not voting, none.


Kearns of Lee moved the adoption of amendment H–1039.













The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 59:




Fisher Forristall Fry Gassman


Hanusa Heartsill Heaton Hein







Sheets Sieck Taylor, R. Upmeyer, Spkr.


Worthan Zumbach Windschitl,

Presiding













The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 59:
















Presiding













The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 59:
















Presiding



Winckler of Scott offered amendment H–1049 filed by her and

moved its adoption.









The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 59:
















Presiding




moved its adoption.









The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 59:
















Presiding



Breckenridge of Jasper asked and received unanimous consent to

withdraw amendment H–1071 filed by him on February 13, 2017.

Mascher of Johnson offered amendment H–1074 filed by her and

moved its adoption.










The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe

The nays were, 59:
















Presiding



Steckman of Cerro Gordo offered amendment H–1078 filed by her





The ayes were, 41:
















Wolfe

The nays were, 59:
















Presiding




moved its adoption.




The ayes were, 41:
















Wolfe

The nays were, 59:
















Presiding




its adoption.




The ayes were, 41:
















Wolfe

The nays were, 59:
















Presiding



Nielsen of Johnson asked and received unanimous consent to

withdraw amendment H–1030 filed by her on February 13, 2017.


her and Hall of Woodbury and moved its adoption.




The ayes were, 41:

















Wolfe

The nays were, 59:
















Presiding



Lensing of Johnson offered amendment H–1045 filed by her and

moved its adoption.




The ayes were, 41:
















Wolfe

The nays were, 59:
















Presiding




its adoption.




The ayes were, 41:











Wolfe



