thÈse - u-bordeaux1.frori-oai.u-bordeaux1.fr/pdf/2009/deckers_rolandus... · [3] braun j, bollow...
TRANSCRIPT
Université Bordeaux 1 Les Sciences et les Technologies au service de l’Homme et de l’environnement
N° d’ordre : 3757
THÈSE
PRÉSENTÉE A
L’UNIVERSITÉ BORDEAUX 1
ÉCOLE DOCTORALE DES SCIENCES à renseigner
Par Roel DECKERS
POUR OBTENIR LE GRADE DE
DOCTEUR
SPÉCIALITÉ : Lasers, matière, nanosciences
LE RÔLE DES ULTRASONS, DE L’IRM ET DE L’IMAGERIE OPTIQUE DANS LE CADRE DE L’ACTIVATION LOCALE
DE GÈNES ET DU DÉPÔT LOCAL DE MÉDICAMENTS
Directeur de recherche : Chrit Moonen
Soutenue le : 19 décembre 2008 Devant la commission d’examen formée de : M. TANTER, Mickael Directeur de Recherche Inserm Rapporteur M. TAVITIAN, Bertrand Chef de Laboratoire CEA (HDR) Rapporteur M. BARTELS, Wilbert Associate Professor UMC Utrecht Examinateur M. BRISSON, Alain Professeur UB1 Président de jury M. VOISIN, Pierre Maître de Conférences UB2 Rapporteur de soutenance M. MOONEN, Chrit Directeur de Recherche CNRS Examinateur
3
Part I. Introduction 7
Chapter 1. General introduction 9
References 11
Chapter 2. Ultrasound 13
2.1. Basics of ultrasound 13
2.2. Focused ultrasound 14
2.3. Interaction of ultrasound with tissue 15
2.4. Radiation force 20
2.5. References 21
Chapter 3. MRI 25
3.1. Introduction 25
3.2. Quantum-mechanical description 25
3.3. Classic-mechanical description 26
3.4. Relaxation and signal detection 27
3.5. Image acquisition 28
3.6. MR thermometry 29
3.7. Automatic control of temperature 31
3.8. References 32
Chapter 4. Optical imaging 35
4.1. Introduction 35
4.2. Origin of light 36
4.3. Interaction light-tissue 40
4.4. Light measurement 42
4.5. References 44
Part II. Spatio-temporal control of gene activation 47
Chapter 5. Regulatable gene expression systems 49
5.1. Introduction 49
5.2. References 51
4
Chapter 6. Heat shock proteins 53
6.1. Introduction 53
6.2. Hsp promoters in gene therapy 54
6.3. References 55
Chapter 7. In vitro characterization of Hsp70 promoter 57
7.1. Introduction 57
7.2. Materials & methods 60
7.3. Results 62
7.4. Discussion 67
7.5. Conclusions 69
7.6. Reference 70
Chapter 8. In vivo characterization of the Hsp70 promoter 73
8.1. Introduction 73
8.2. Material & methods 74
8.3. Results 76
8.4. Discussion 84
8.5. Conclusion 85
8.6. References 86
Chapter 9. Local gene activation using MR guided HIFU 89
9.1. Introduction 89
9.2. Material & methods 90
9.3. Results 93
9.4. Discussion 98
9.5. Conclusions 102
9.6. References 102
Part III. Local drug delivery 105
Chapter 10. The role of ultrasound and molecular imaging in local drug delivery 107
10.1. Introduction 107
10.2. Ultrasound facilitated local drug delivery 109
10.3. Imaging of drug delivery 111
5
10.4. References 117
Chapter 11. MRI monitoring of ultrasound mediated drug delivery 125
11.1. Introduction 125
11.2. Materials and methods 127
11.3. Results 130
11.4. Discussion 133
11.5. References 135
Part IV. Summaries and perspectives 139
Summary 141
Perspectives 145
Résumé 147
Perspectives 151
Part V. Word of thanks and publications 153
Word of thanks 155
List of publications 157
9
Chapter 1. General introduction
Historically, image guided therapy has combined advances in imaging and therapeutic
technology to develop minimally invasive surgical and interventional techniques. Different
imaging modalities, mainly CT and ultrasound, but also MRI and PET/SPECT are used in the
preparation phase, during treatment and for post-treatment evaluation. The different imaging
modalities are increasingly used during minimally invasive procedures for real-time guidance
of instruments. Ultrasound is for example the primary modality for guiding radio-frequency
needles [1] and laser fibers used in tumor ablation [2]. Local injections of anti-inflammatory
drugs (steroids) for herniated disks [3] and the injection of blood cloth removal drugs are
performed with CT guidance [4]. The latest developments in image guided therapy such as
the fusion of imaging technologies with robotics and multi-modality imaging increase even
further the available information and the precision of the intervention [5,6].
MRI guided high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a completely non-invasive form of
image guided therapy and entered the clinical environment only recently for treatment of
uterine fibroids [7]. Further clinical trials are underway for treatment of cancers in breast,
liver and prostate [8-10].
New non-invasive image guided molecular therapies are evolving. These novel therapies use
molecular imaging techniques for dynamically monitoring of cellular function and molecular
processes in living animals [11]. Molecular imaging allows for (early) identification of
diseased tissue using imaging probes targeted to disease specific markers on cell membrane
[12,13] and tracking cell migration [14]. Combining molecular imaging with nanomedicine
can further improve the efficacy of molecular and cellular therapy. Monitoring of
nanomedicine such as genes, antibodies, chemotherapeutic drugs and drug carriers with
molecular imaging techniques gives insight in the local interaction of the drug with the tissue
and allows for the development of more specific nanomedicine. In this thesis two different
applications areas of image guided molecular therapy using MRI, HIFU and optical imaging
are exploited: local gene activation and local drug delivery.
Gene therapy is an experimental technique that uses genes to treat or prevent disease instead
of using drugs or surgery. With gene therapy it is possible to add a missing gene in the
genome and replace or repair a gene that malfunctions. Although gene therapy is a promising
treatment option for a number of diseases (including inherited disorders, some types of
cancer, and certain viral infections), the technique remains risky (e.g. auto-immune reponse to
10
introduced gene and toxicity of viral vector) and is still being investigated to make sure that it
will be safe and effective. One part of the study is based on the delivery of the therapeutic
gene. Autoimmune reactions, toxicity and the low efficacy of gene delivery are here the major
problems to conquer. Secondly, a tight control of gene activation is necessary, because the
objective of gene therapy is to express a therapeutic gene in the region where therapy is
required and for the duration necessary to achieve a therapeutic effect and to minimize
systemic toxicity. This implies the need for spatial and temporal control of gene activation in
vivo, which will be the subject of Part II in this thesis. Part II starts with an overview of the
different approaches for spatial and/or temporal control of local gene activation. In this thesis
local hyperthermia in combination with a temperature sensitive heat shock protein (Hsp)
promoter will be used for local gene activation. In Chapter 6 a biological background on heat
shock proteins is provided, including a discussion on the possible applications of the Hsp
promoter in gene therapy. In the following chapters the influence of different heating
protocols on the promoter activity are determined in order to be able to do treatment planning.
First the characteristics of the Hsp promoter are analyzed in vitro (Chapter 7) and then in vivo
(Chapter 8). Finally, we demonstrate in Chapter 9 the use of MR guided HIFU for the local
activation of a transgene.
Not only gene therapy, but also drug delivery may take advantage of the local deposition of
thermal and/or mechanical energy by means of ultrasound and this is the subject of Part III in
this thesis. In chemotherapy anti-cancer drugs are often administrated systemically resulting
in low concentration in the tumor, hence low treatment efficacy and significant toxic side
effects. Local increase of the cytotoxic drug concentration would ameliorate the efficacy of
the therapy and reduce systemic toxicity. Ultrasound can play an important role in facilitating
local drug delivery, which is explained in Chapter 10. Another important facet of local drug
delivery is monitoring non-invasively the drug’s pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics,
giving real time insight in the position and concentration of the drug and its influence on the
system. An overview of the different imaging modalities and their strengths and weakness are
also given in chapter 10. In Chapter 11 we demonstrate that we can improve the deposition of
a macromolecule in the liver with a clinical echograph and that we can follow the process of
delivery dynamically with a clinical MR scanner.
The thesis will begin with an introduction of the most important techniques (ultrasound, MRI
and optical imaging) used for the research performed in this thesis.
11
References
[1] Solbiati L, Ierace T, Goldberg SN, Sironi S, Livraghi T, Fiocca R, Servadio G,
Rizzatto G, Mueller PR, Del Maschio A, Gazelle GS. Percutaneous US-guided radio-
frequency tissue ablation of liver metastases: treatment and follow-up in 16 patients.
Radiology 1997;202(1):195-203.
[2] Nolsoe CP, Torp-Pedersen S, Burcharth F, Horn T, Pedersen S, Christensen NE,
Olldag ES, Andersen PH, Karstrup S, Lorentzen T, et al. Interstitial hyperthermia of
colorectal liver metastases with a US-guided Nd-YAG laser with a diffuser tip: a pilot
clinical study. Radiology 1993;187(2):333-337.
[3] Braun J, Bollow M, Seyrekbasan F, Haberle HJ, Eggens U, Mertz A, Distler A, Sieper
J. Computed tomography guided corticosteroid injection of the sacroiliac joint in
patients with spondyloarthropathy with sacroiliitis: clinical outcome and followup by
dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. J Rheumatol 1996;23(4):659-664.
[4] Montes JM, Wong JH, Fayad PB, Awad IA. Stereotactic computed tomographic-
guided aspiration and thrombolysis of intracerebral hematoma : protocol and
preliminary experience. Stroke 2000;31(4):834-840.
[5] Rasmus M, Huegli RW, Bilecen D, Jacob AL. Robotically assisted CT-based
procedures. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2007;16(4):212-216.
[6] Yap JT, Carney JP, Hall NC, Townsend DW. Image-guided cancer therapy using
PET/CT. Cancer J 2004;10(4):221-233.
[7] Tempany CM, Stewart EA, McDannold N, Quade BJ, Jolesz FA, Hynynen K. MR
imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of uterine leiomyomas: a feasibility study.
Radiology 2003;226(3):897-905.
[8] Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Bouvier R, Rouviere O, Lasne Y, Lyonnet D, Dubernard JM.
Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound: minimally invasive therapy of localized
prostate cancer. J Endourol 2000;14(6):519-528.
[9] Hynynen K, Pomeroy O, Smith DN, Huber PE, McDannold NJ, Kettenbach J, Baum
J, Singer S, Jolesz FA. MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of
fibroadenomas in the breast: a feasibility study. Radiology 2001;219(1):176-185.
[10] Kennedy JE, Wu F, ter Haar GR, Gleeson FV, Phillips RR, Middleton MR, Cranston
D. High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of liver tumours. Ultrasonics
2004;42(1-9):931-935.
[11] Weissleder R, Mahmood U. Molecular imaging. Radiology 2001;219(2):316-333.
12
[12] Cai W, Chen X. Multimodality molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis. J Nucl Med
2008;49 Suppl 2:113S-128S.
[13] Dunphy MP, Strauss HW. Molecular imaging of atherosclerosis. Curr Cardiol Rep
2008;10(2):121-127.
[14] Bulte JW, Kraitchman DL. Monitoring cell therapy using iron oxide MR contrast
agents. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2004;5(6):567-584.
13
Chapter 2. Ultrasound
2.1. Basics of ultrasound
Ultrasound is a pressure wave that propagates within a medium, inducing mechanical
vibrations of particles at a frequency above 20 kHz. In most cases, the oscillatory
displacement of particles is in the direction of wave propagation (i.e. longitudinal wave),
creating regions with high pressure (compressions) and low pressure (rarefaction) (Figure
2.1). The wavelength (λ) of the ultrasound wave, which is distance between two rarefactions,
depends on both frequency (f) and propagation speed (c) of ultrasound:
f
c=λ 2-1
The typical wavelength in soft tissue is about 1 mm at a frequency of 1.5 MHz. The
propagation speed of ultrasound is about 1550 ms-1 for soft tissue, independent of the
ultrasound frequency. In fatty tissue the average speed is only slightly lower (1480 ms-1),
whereas in air spaces a value of 343 ms-1 is found. In bone, the speed is much higher (between
1800 and 3700 ms-1). When ultrasound meets the interface between two media, it may be
partially reflected and partially transmitted, depending on the incident angle and the
difference in acoustic impedance of the two media. The large difference in acoustic
impedance (product of propagation speed in medium and density of medium) between air and
soft tissue causes an almost complete reflection of the ultrasound wave at tissue/air interfaces.
At the bone/soft tissue interface there is also a complete reflection at incident angles larger
than 30º.
14
Figure 2.1 Longitudinal and transverse waves. In longitudinal waves the oscillatory
displacement of particles is in the direction of wave propagation, creating regions with high
pressure (compressions) and low pressure (rarefaction). In contrast, the particle motion in
transverse waves is perpendicular to the wave motion. The distance between two succeeding
rarefaction (or compressions) equals the wave length (λ).
2.2. Focused ultrasound
In general, focused ultrasound is generated using a curved resonant piezo-electric element.
The principle is based on interference of ultrasound waves. At the focal point, waves
originating from different points on the ultrasound transducer are in phase, resulting in
constructive inference and thus a maximal ultrasound intensity. The shape of the focal point
depends on the architecture of the transducer and the frequency. The geometry of a transducer
is often described by an F-number, which is the ratio between the focal depth (l) and the
diameter of aperture (d) of the transducer (F-number = l/d). A smaller F-number leads to
stronger focusing with a shorter focal point length along the beam axis (i.e. axial resolution).
The minimum width of the focal point is half λ (i.e. lateral resolution), thus by increasing the
frequency, the size of the focal point will be reduced. An alternative method to focus
ultrasound is the combination of multiple small ultrasound elements, a so-called phased array.
15
2.3. Interaction of ultrasound with tissue
It is well known that the interaction of ultrasound with tissue can produce a wide variety of
biological effects [1,2]. The underlying physical mechanisms include acoustic local heating,
radiation pressure and cavitation. Below the physical principles associated with these three
mechanisms and their bioeffects are discussed in more detail.
2.3.1. Heat
The intensity of an ultrasonic wave travelling through a medium may be attenuated. In
experimental studies, attenuation has been found to be dominated by absorption. During
absorption, the mechanical energy of the acoustic wave (micrometer displacements with a
frequency in the kHz-MHz range) is predominantly converted into heat (atomic vibrations
with sub-nanometer displacements with frequencies well above 1GHz). There are several
mechanisms by which absorption can occur. However, the exact mechanisms by which
ultrasound is absorbed by biological materials are rather complicated. It has been observed
that, within the frequency range used for medical ultrasonic imaging (2-15 MHz), most
tissues have an absorption coefficient that is linearly proportional to the frequency [3]. The
intensity Ix at depth x with respect to that at the original position (I0) for plane wave in tissue
may be described as
100 10
x
x II⋅−
⋅=α
2-2
where the symbol α represents the absorption coefficient of the wave amplitude per unit path
length and usually lies in the range of 50 to 350 dB m-1 MHz-1 in soft tissue [4]. For example,
using 1.5 MHz ultrasound, the intensity in muscle will drop to about 50% at 50 mm
penetration. For a given absorption coefficient, the rate of heat generation is proportional to
the local intensity, and thus diminishes also in an exponential way with increasing depth.
However, by using focused ultrasound instead of planar waves much higher intensities can be
obtained at the focal point, resulting in heating of deep lying tissue with relatively low
increase of the temperature of tissue between the target region and the transducer [5].
The choice of the ultrasound frequency to be used for a given application is a compromise
between tissue penetration, spot size and heat generation and changes for different sonication
depths. As mentioned before, the attenuation of the ultrasound by the tissue in the path of the
beam will increase with frequency. However, the increased absorption coefficient due to the
16
higher ultrasound frequency also results in better heating. This is illustrated in Figure 2.2
where the energy density and temperature are plotted for a simulation of acoustic heating at
two different depths in tissue. Generally, the ultrasound frequencies for HIFU heating are in
the lower megahertz range. Hyperthermia finds its applications in gene therapy as well as in
local drug delivery. Both applications will be discussed in more detail in Part III.
Figure 2.2 Energy density and temperature as function of penetration depth in tissue. The
absorption coefficient is linearly proportional to the ultrasound frequency. Therefore, the
energy density after a certain distance of tissue penetration is always lower for the higher
frequency (a and b). However, the heat generation is linearly proportional to the energy
density and the absorption coefficient. Therefore, the optimal frequency for heating depends
on the penetration depth in tissue (c and d).
17
2.3.2. Cavitation
Acoustic cavitation is defined as the formation and/or activity of gas-filled bubbles in a
medium exposed to ultrasound [6]. These gas-filled bubbles can be of natural origin or
artificially made (i.e. microbubbles). The sustained growth of cavitation bubbles and their
oscillations over several acoustic cycles is known as stable or non inertial cavitation [7]. In
contrast, when a cavitation bubble grows violently and collapses in less then a cycle this is
called transient or inertial cavitation [7]. In general, the likelihood and intensity of inertial
cavitation increases at higher pressures (p in MPa) and lower frequencies (f in MHz) [8].
These two exposure parameters have been combined in a single mechanical index (MI)
defined as [9]:
f
pMI = 2-3
The pressure (p) of an ultrasound wave is related to the acoustic intensity (I) as follows:
c
pI
ρ2
2
= 2-4
where ρ and c are the density and ultrasound propagation speed of the medium, respectively.
This equation indicates that high intensities obtained with HIFU also results in high local
pressures.
The cavitation process will also be affected by the number and size of the cavitation bubbles,
the available spaces for the bubbles to oscillate and their physical properties such as the type
of gas in its interior and the composition of its shell [7]. These parameters, among others (i.e.
pulse length, pulse repetition frequency and duration of exposure), were recently investigated
for ultrasound/microbubble-mediated gene delivery into cultured adherent cells by Rahim et
al. [10]. The authors found an approximately linear-dependence between the gene delivery
efficiency and acoustic pressure over the range 0.1-0.5 MPa. The optimized parameters for
high levels of gene delivery and cell viability using 1 MHz US were found to be a pulse
pressure amplitude of 0.25 MPa (peak-negative), a pulse repetition frequency of 1kHz, 40
cycles pulse length and 10 s exposure. Other studies on the subject have been published (e.g.
[11]). Since many parameters are involved (including tissue parameters), some variability in
optimal parameters may not be surprising.
18
Stable Cavitation
Stable cavitation occurs at low pressure waves and is associated with the physical phenomena
of rectified diffusion, microstreaming, and coalescence of small bubbles to form larger ones
[12]. Rectified diffusion describes the slow growth of an oscillating bubble related to a net
inflow of gas into the bubble over successive cycles, until it reaches a resonant size [13]. At
resonant size the bubble will show stable, low amplitude oscillations. The resonance
frequency (fr) of this linear, undamped system is given by [14]:
ργ
πP
Rf r
3
2
1
0
= 2-5
where R0 is the initial radius of the bubble, γ is the heat capacity ratio (γ equals 1.4 for a
diatomic gas such as oxygen), P is the ambient pressure and ρ is the density of the
surrounding medium. Therefore, a reasonable estimation of resonance frequency (in MHz) of
a free spherical gas bubble (with an initial radius R0 in µm) in water at 20° C and atmospheric
pressure is given by:
0
3,3
Rf r ≈ 2-6
The low amplitude oscillations induce inhomogeneous cyclic pressure fields around the
bubbles, which cause small flows in the bubble surrounding fluid, a process known as
microstreaming [15]. Marmottant et al. showed that weak oscillations related to stable
cavitation can be sufficient to rupture single cells. The microstreaming creates high shear
stresses (10-2 N m-1) near the bubble surface that may increase strain in the membrane of
surrounding cells and even exceed its critical value for membrane rupture [16]. This may
result in cell wall permeation, a phenomenon advantageous for drug delivery across the cell
membrane. This effect was clearly visualized by Van Wamel et al., showing the uptake of
propium iodide (PI) by a cell that was deformed by microbubble oscillations whereas an un-
deformed reference cell did not show uptake of PI [17].
19
Figure 2.3 Oscillation of microbubble causes uptake of propium iodide (PI) by mechanically
deformed cell. The frames are recorded by an ultra fast camera (Brandaris) (A) First frame of
a Brandaris recording in which contours (membranes) of the cells are drawn (dashed lines).
Two cells can be distinguished as well as the intercellular space and the microbubbles. (B)
Brandaris recording: 6 selected frames out of a total of 128 frames. The pushing and pulling
20
behavior of the vibrating microbubbles nearby the cells is shown. Cell I was not deformed,
cell II was deformed (arrows in frame 0009). (C) Fluorescence images of PI uptake of the two
cells are shown. The first frame is before US exposure and the two circles indicate the
position of the microbubbles. The second frame is taken 0.25 min after US was turned off, in
this image the deformed cell II shows PI uptake, whereas the un-deformed cell I shows no PI
uptake. The deformed cell contained PI only for a short period of time. The last frame is a
bright field image of the cells 3 min after US exposure. Figure adapted from [17].
Inertial cavitation
Inertial cavitation occurs at higher acoustic pressure and is associated with several physical
phenomena [18]. During the rapid collapse of the gas bubble, the inward moving wall of fluid
has sufficient inertia so that it cannot reverse direction when the acoustic pressure reverses
direction, but continues to compress the gas in the bubble to a very small volume. During this
process the pressure and temperature can reach thousands of bars and degrees Kelvin possibly
even leading to emission of light (sonoluminescence) [19] and production of free radicals
(sonochemistry) [20]. The collapse of the bubble also generates shock waves that spherically
diverge in the surrounding environment of the bubble. When collapsing bubbles are in the
vicinity of solid boundaries (e.g. cell membranes), the collapse will be asymmetrical and can
result in the formation of high speed, fluid microjets [21]. The preceding physical phenomena
may facilitate drug delivery in two ways. First, they can disrupt the shell of drug delivery
systems thereby releasing the enclosed drugs. The fragmentation thresholds for several
ultrasound contrast agents (i.e. microbubbles) were investigated by Chen et al. [22] and Shi et
al. [23]. Secondly, these phenomena can cause cell membrane permeabilization and capillary
rupture. Lokhandwalla and Sturtevant performed a theoretical analysis of how shock waves,
bubble wall motion (i.e. bubble expansion and collapse) and microjets may affect membrane
permeability. They show that these mechanisms can cause the membrane to deform beyond
the threshold strain for rupture [24]. Sundaram et al. performed experimental and theoretical
analyses confirming the influence of inertial cavitation in cell membrane permeabilization
[25].
2.4. Radiation force
Although heat deposition and cavitation are the most widely investigated ultrasound-related
mechanisms producing biological effects in tissues, there is an increasing amount of evidence
that radiation forces may be used for enhanced delivery during high intensity focused
21
ultrasound (HIFU) exposures [26,27]. Radiation forces are produced by HIFU pulses, in
which the absorption and/or reflection of acoustic energy causes a transfer of momentum
from the ultrasound wave to the medium [28]. The primary radiation force acts in the
direction of acoustic wave propagation and a secondary radiation force acts between
individual bubbles [29]. Radiation force-induced displacements may cause shear forces
between displaced and non-displaced tissue. The strain resulting from these stresses may
induce gaps between endothelial cells [30,31] and widening intracellular spaces in epithelial
tissue [32,33]. The former effect will increase the drug extravasation from the vasculature and
the latter effect will increase the intracellular drug diffusion. Although more in depth
investigations are necessary to show that this proposed mechanism is conclusive, there are
several preclinical studies that show the feasibility of this mechanism. The combination of
pulsed-HIFU targeted exposure with systemically administered agents has been used to
increase local delivery of a magnetic resonance contrast agent [34], a high molecular weight
fluorescein isothyocyanate (FITC)-dextran [27], doxorubicin (DoxilTM) [35] and
ThermodoxTM [36]. The primary radiation force may also be used to direct delivery vehicles,
circulating in the blood pool, near a vessel wall, where they will move at a reduced velocity
compared to the vehicles in the centre of the vessel [37]. In addition, the secondary radiation
force cause individual particles to attract each other [38], resulting in an even larger
microbubble concentration near the vessel wall and thus in an enhanced receptor-ligand
contact which may be beneficial for targeted drug delivery [39,40].
2.5. References
[1] Dalecki D. Mechanical bioeffects of ultrasound. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2004;6:229-
248.
[2] Miller MW, Miller DL, Brayman AA. A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial
ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. Ultrasound Med Biol
1996;22(9):1131-1154.
[3] Hueter TF. Messung der Ultraschallabsorption in tierschen Geweben und ihre
Abhangigkeit von der Frequenz. Naturwiss 1948;35(9).
[4] Duck FA. Physical properties of tissue; A comprehensive reference book. London:
Academic Press; 1990.
[5] Lele PP. Induction of deep, local hyperthermia by ultrasound and electromagnetic
fields: problems and choices. Radiat Environ Biophys 1980;17(3):205-217.
22
[6] Apfel RE. Acoustic cavitation: a possible consequence of biomedical uses of
ultrasound. Br J Cancer Suppl 1982:140-146.
[7] Leighton TG. The acoustic bubble; 1994.
[8] Hill CR. Ultrasonic Exposure Thresholds for Changes in Cells and Tissues. The
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1972;52(2B):667-672.
[9] Apfel RE, Holland CK. Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-
duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1991;17(2):179-185.
[10] Rahim A, Taylor SL, Bush NL, ter Haar GR, Bamber JC, Porter CD. Physical
parameters affecting ultrasound/microbubble-mediated gene delivery efficiency in
vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006;32(8):1269-1279.
[11] Zarnitsyn VG, Prausnitz MR. Physical parameters influencing optimization of
ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004;30(4):527-538.
[12] Boyle RW, Taylor GB, Froman DK. Cavitation in the track of an ultrasound beam.
Trans Roy Soc Canada Section III 1929;23:187-201.
[13] Harvey EN, Barnes DK, McElroy WD, Whiteley AH, Pease DC, Cooper KW. Bubble
formation in animals. I. Physical factors. J Cell Comp Physiol 1944;24:1-22.
[14] Minnaert M. On musical air-bubbles and sounds of running water. Phil Mag
1933;16:235-248.
[15] Nyborg WL. Basic physics of low frequency therapeutic ultrasound. Boston: Kluwer
Academic; 1996.
[16] Marmottant P, Hilgenfeldt S. Controlled vesicle deformation and lysis by single
oscillating bubbles. Nature 2003;423(6936):153-156.
[17] van Wamel A, Kooiman K, Harteveld M, Emmer M, ten Cate FJ, Versluis M, de Jong
N. Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: Drug transfer into cells via
sonoporation. Journal of Controlled Release 2006;112(2):149-155.
[18] Flynn HG, Church CC. Transient pulsations of small gas bubbles in water. J Acoust
Soc Am 1988;84:1863-1876.
[19] Hilgenfeldt S, Grossmann S, Lohse D. A simple explanation of light emission in
sonoluminescence. Nature 1999;398(6726):402-405.
[20] Suslick KS. Ultrasound: its chemical, physical and biological effects. London: VCH
Publishers; 1989.
[21] Blake JR, Gibson DC. Cavitation bubbles near boundaries. Ann Rev Fluid Mech
1987;19:99-123.
23
[22] Chen WS, Matula TJ, Brayman AA, Crum LA. A comparison of the fragmentation
thresholds and inertial cavitation doses of different ultrasound contrast agents. J
Acoust Soc Am 2003;113(1):643-651.
[23] Shi WT, Forsberg F, Tornes A, Ostensen J, Goldberg BB. Destruction of contrast
microbubbles and the association with inertial cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol
2000;26(6):1009-1019.
[24] Lokhandwalla M, McAteer JA, Williams JC, Sturtevant B. Mechanical hemolysis in
shock wave lithotripsy (SWL): II. In vitro cell lysis due to shear. Phys Med Biol
2001;46:1245-1264.
[25] Sundaram J, Mellein BR, Mitragotri S. An experimental and theoretical analysis of
ultrasound-induced permeabilization of cell membranes. Biophys J 2003;84(5):3087-
3101.
[26] Dittmar KM, Xie J, Hunter F, Trimble C, Bur M, Frenkel V, Li KC. Pulsed high-
intensity focused ultrasound enhances systemic administration of naked DNA in
squamous cell carcinoma model: initial experience. Radiology 2005;235(2):541-546.
[27] Yuh EL, Shulman SG, Mehta SA, Xie J, Chen L, Frenkel V, Bednarski MD, Li KC.
Delivery of systemic chemotherapeutic agent to tumors by using focused ultrasound:
study in a murine model. Radiology 2005;234(2):431-437.
[28] Rooney JA, Nyborg WL. Acoustic Radiation Pressure in a Traveling Plane Wave.
American Journal of Physics 1972;40(12):1825-1830.
[29] Bjerknes VFK. Fields of Force. New York: Columbia University Press; 1906.
[30] Mesiwala AH, Farrell L, Wenzel HJ, Silbergeld DL, Crum LA, Winn HR, Mourad
PD. High-intensity focused ultrasound selectively disrupts the blood-brain barrier in
vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002;28(3):389-400.
[31] Seidl M, Steinbach P, Worle K, Hofstadter F. Induction of stress fibres and
intercellular gaps in human vascular endothelium by shock-waves. Ultrasonics
1994;32(5):397-400.
[32] Frenkel V, Kimmel E, Iger Y. Ultrasound-facilitated transport of silver chloride
(AgCl) particles in fish skin. J Control Release 2000;68(2):251-261.
[33] Frenkel V, Kimmel E, Iger Y. Ultrasound-induced intercellular space widening in fish
epidermis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000;26(3):473-480.
[34] Bednarski MD, Lee JW, Callstrom MR, Li KC. In vivo target-specific delivery of
macromolecular agents with MR-guided focused ultrasound. Radiology
1997;204(1):263-268.
24
[35] Frenkel V, Etherington A, Greene M, Quijano J, Xie J, Hunter F, Dromi S, Li KC.
Delivery of liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) in a breast cancer tumor model:
investigation of potential enhancement by pulsed-high intensity focused ultrasound
exposure. Acad Radiol 2006;13(4):469-479.
[36] Dromi S, Quijano J, Xie J, Frenkel V, wood B, Li K. Pulsed-high intesity focused
ultrasound (HIFU) enhanced delivery of doxorubicin using heat sensitive liposome
(Thermodox). 2005; Chicago.
[37] Dayton P, Klibanov A, Brandenburger G, Ferrara K. Acoustic radiation force in vivo:
a mechanism to assist targeting of microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol
1999;25(8):1195-1201.
[38] Dayton PA, Morgan KE, Klibanov AL, Brandenburger G, Nightingale KR, Ferrara
KW. A preliminary evaluation of the effects of primary and secondaryradiation forces
on acoustic contrast agents. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE
Transactions on 1997;44(6):1264-1277.
[39] Borden MA, Sarantos MR, Stieger SM, Simon SI, Ferrara KW, Dayton PA.
Ultrasound radiation force modulates ligand availability on targeted contrast agents.
Mol Imaging 2006;5(3):139-147.
[40] Lum AF, Borden MA, Dayton PA, Kruse DE, Simon SI, Ferrara KW. Ultrasound
radiation force enables targeted deposition of model drug carriers loaded on
microbubbles. J Control Release 2006;111(1-2):128-134.
25
Chapter 3. MRI
3.1. Introduction
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is based on the phenomenon of nuclear magnetic
resonance (NMR), which involves the measurement of signals induced in a receiver coil by
atomic nuclei in response to radio waves. The physical principles of NMR are based on
quantum mechanics, but most phenomena concerning MRI can be explained with classical
mechanics.
3.2. Quantum-mechanical description
Depending on the number of neutrons and protons of which it is composed, a nucleus can
have a net spin, i.e. its spin quantum number, I, is non-zero. Think of the spin of this nucleus
as a magnetic moment vector, causing the proton to behave like a tiny magnet with a north
and south pole. Placed in an external magnetic field, this magnetic moment tends to align
itself in the direction of the field. In quantum mechanical terms, the magnetic moment can
align in only 2I + 1 ways with an external magnetic field; the magnetic moment can only
occupy discrete states that have different energy levels. For hydrogen (1H), a nucleus with
spin ½, only two spin states exist. The energy difference between the lower and higher level,
∆E, depends on the gyromagnetic ratio (γ) of the nucleus and the strength of the local
magnetic field (B0):
πγ2
0hBE =∆ 3-1
where h is Plancks constant. A spin can undergo a transition between the two energy states by
the absorption or emission of a photon of frequency ν0, such that
0000
22B
hhBE γυυ
ππγ
=→==∆ 3-2
Expressing the frequency in angular terms gives the Larmor equation:
00 Bγω = 3-3
where ω0 is the Larmor frequency.
26
When a group of spins is placed in a magnetic field, each spin aligns in one of the two
possible orientations. For spin ½ nuclei, like hydrogen, the relative population of the two spin
states is determined by the Boltzmann distribution:
kTEen
n /∆−+
−
= 3-4
where k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature in Kelvin and ∆E is the energy
difference between the two states, given by equation 3-1 . NMR experiments involve the
disturbance of the Boltzmann distribution by absorption and emission of quanta with energy
∆E. However, it is very cumbersome to describe NMR experiments in a quantum mechanical
way, a classic mechanical approach is more convenient.
3.3. Classic-mechanical description
Living tissue consists of 60% to 80% of water in which macro-molecules are suspended. In
both, water and macro-molecules, hydrogen spins represent the largest group of MR-
observable nuclei. In most aspect of MR experiments the group of nuclei under observation
behaves like a large ensemble of spin ½ nuclei and can be described by classical mechanics.
Herein the net magnetization of the ensemble of spin ½ nuclei is represented by a
magnetization vector (M). If the magnetization vector is placed in a static magnetic field B0,
M will experience a torque. The motion of M is described by the Bloch equation [1]:
( )BMdt
dM ×= γ 3-5
This equation describes the precession of M around B0. The angular frequency of the
precession is identical to the Larmor frequency derived in the quantum mechanical
description above (equation 3-3), showing how the classical and quantum mechanical pictures
coincide. In the presence of a large main magnetic field (B0) as well as magnetic field (B1),
applied perpendicular to the B0-field and oscillating at ω0, the magnetization vector will
precess simultaneously about B0 at ω0 and B1 at ω1. This means M will spiral down from
longitudinal plane into the transversal plane when viewed in the laboratory frame of reference
(Figure 3.1a). In a new frame of reference, the rotating frame, which rotates about z-axis at
ω0, the magnetization vector is rotated about the x-axis at an angular frequency of ω1 (Figure
3.1b).
27
3.4. Relaxation and signal detection
The most common way to carry out an NMR experiment is to apply a short burst of resonant
radio frequency (RF) pulse (B1) to rotate the magnetization vector from the longitudinal plane
into the transverse plane. Once in the transverse plane the magnetization can be detected as it
precesses about z-axis, and this is what gives rise to the NMR signal.
The application of a resonant RF pulse disturbs the spin system. The thermal equilibrium state
of the system will be restored by a process known as spin-lattice relaxation. This involves
exchange of energy between the spin system and its surroundings and the rate at which the
equilibrium is restored is characterised by the spin-lattice or longitudinal relaxation time, T1.
In addition to the T1-relaxation effect, the NMR signal will decrease due to a second and
faster relaxation process, spin-spin relaxation. In this process spins exchange energy amongst
them, resulting in no net change in the population of the energy levels, however it leads to a
lost of phase coherence. The rate of lost of phase coherence is characterised by the spin-spin
or transversal relaxation time, T2. Microscopic and macroscopic field inhomogeneities also
contribute to the lost of phase coherence. This will lead to signal decay with a time constant
that is shorter than T2, which is generally referred to as T2*. The relaxation times T1, T2 and
T2* are very important in imaging, as they have the greatest effect in determining image
contrast.
Figure 3.1 Development of the magnetization vector after a 90° RF-pulse excitation in the
laboratory (a) and rotating frame (b) of reference.
28
3.5. Image acquisition
The principle behind all magnetic resonance imaging is the Larmor equation, which shows
that the resonance frequency ω of a spin is proportional to the magnetic field, B. This means
that a measurement of precession frequency of the magnetization gives information on the
field experienced by that group of spins. By manipulating the spatial variation of the
magnetization field in a known way, this frequency information will yield spatial information.
This idea was first proposed by Lauterbur [2] and Mansfield [3] and lies at the origin of MR
imaging. In practice this is done by superimposing a series of linear magnetic field gradients
in three perpendicular directions onto the main magnetic field. The purpose of the magnetic
field gradients are slice selection and position encoding within the selected slice, known as
frequency and phase encoding. By loop-wise repetition of frequency and phase encoding in a
selected slice, a 2-D frequency map can be obtained. To reconstruct the real image, which is
the spin density distribution, a 2-D Fourier transform is applied, which results in a complex
image. The magnitude and phase image are calculated from the real and imaginary part of the
complex image Figure 3.2). Notice that MR images are not pure proton density images but
represent a weighted proton density that depends on T1, T2, possibly T2* and the acquisition
parameters (repetition time, echo time, flip angle).
Figure 3.2 Example of magnitude (a) and phase (b) MR image.
29
3.6. MR thermometry
A number of parameters that play a role in a MRI experiment, such as the spin-lattice
relaxation time T1 [4], the molecular diffusion coefficient D [5] and the water proton
resonance frequency (PRF) [6,7], are temperature dependent. All MR thermometry in this
study is based on the PRF and therefore will be explained in more detail below. The reader is
referred to recent reviews on MR thermometry by Quesson et al. [8] and Rieke et al. [9] for
more information on other MR thermometry methods.
The temperature dependence of the PRF was first observed by Hindman [10] while studying
the intermolecular forces and hydrogen bond formation between water molecules. MR-
temperature monitoring on the basis of the PRF was first proposed by Ishihara et al. [11] and
De Poorter et al. [12].
The resonance frequency of a nucleus in a molecule is determined by the local magnetic field
Bnuc it experiences, which is a function of the main magnetic field B0 and the chemical shift
σ(T):
0))(1()( BTTBnuc σ+= 3-6
The chemical shift field (in ppm) is the sum of temperature-indepedent contributions σ0 and a
temperature-dependent contribution σT(T):
)()( 0 TT Tσσσ += 3-7
The chemical shift field can be calculated from the phase information in gradient echo
images:
TEBTT ⋅⋅⋅=Φ 0)()( σγ 3-8
where Φ is the image phase, γ is the gyromagnetic ratio and TE is the echo time. In order to
measure only temperature-dependent changes in chemical shift, the term σ0 has to be
cancelled out, which is typically accomplished by subtraction of the field distribution
measured at a given reference temperature T0 (before heating) from the field distribution
measured at temperature T (during heating), resulting in:
TEB
TTTTT
⋅⋅⋅Φ−Φ
=−=∆0
00
)()(
γα 3-9
30
where α is the temperature-dependent water chemical shift in ppm/ºC, this process is also
illustrated in Figure 3.3. A (temperature dependent) contrast change can be observed in the
phase image at the location of the heating (arrow). From the preceding explanation it follows
that the PRF based method measures the temperature difference with respect to reference
temperature. Therefore it is very important to have a reliable measure of this reference
temperature and avoid non-temperature related phase changes. Reference temperature
measurements can be done by absolute MR temperature measurements [13], temperature
sensitive contrast agents [14,15] or by introducing a small thermometer. During all
experiments in this study animal temperature was measured with a rectal probe, as an
indicator of basal tissue temperature [16]. In principle, any gradient-echo method can be used
for PRF-based MR thermometry. However, gradient echo methods can not recover phase
losses from magnetic field inhomogeneities, magnetic susceptibilities and water-fat
incoherences, which introduce non-temperature related phase changes and lead to
thermometry errors. Spin echo sequences can not be used since the temperature-induced phase
contribution will be cancelled by the refocusing pulse.
Figure 3.3 Calculation of temperature map using the phase information of gradient echo
images. Subtraction of the phase image before heating (Φ0) from the phase image during
heating (Φ), multiplied with the PRF constant leads to a temperature map. The arrow
indicates the location of heating.
The main advantages of the PRF based method are its near independence of tissue
composition and its high spatial and temporal resolution, which allows for continuous
temperature monitoring. The most prevalent problem for temperature monitoring with the
PRF based method is motion, because it introduces non-temperature related phase changes.
Motion artefacts during the MR thermometry sequence can be divided in two categories,
intra-scan and inter-scan motion, based on the time scale of the motion as compared to the
31
image acquisition time. Intra-scan motion is caused by the movement of an object during MR
image acquisition, yielding a low quality image with typical ghosting and blurring. These
motion artefacts can be reduced by accelerating the image acquisition. However, trade-offs
between acquisition time and SNR and temperature uncertainty have to be considered. Inter-
scan motion occurs due to motion or displacement of an object between the acquisition of
consecutive images. Examples of inter-scan motion are accidental patient motion or periodic
respiratory and cardiac motion. Reduction of inter-scan motion artefacts is achieved by
motion restraining, synchronization of acquisition with motion [17] or image processing
techniques such as the atlas-based motion correction proposed by Denis de Senneville et al.
[18].
3.7. Automatic control of temperature
Real-time temperature mapping during the hyperthermic procedure allows the development of
automatic feedback coupling of the heating device, ultrasound in this case. This technique is
known as MR guided HIFU [19,20]. In this method online monitoring of temperature
distribution is performed by continuous acquisition of gradient echo images. Temperature
maps are calculated online (using the phase information of GE images) to dynamically
visualize the tissue temperature and to adjust continuously the HIFU power to force the
temperature at the focal point to follow a predefined value. Figure 3.4 shows an example of
this automatic regulation process. The temperature evolution versus time is displayed with in
black the target temperature and in red the measured temperature at the focal point. Notice
that the temperature is displayed as temperature increase with regard to a reference
temperature. MR guided HIFU allows the temperature to be adjusted with a precision in the
range of 1º C [21].
32
Figure 3.4 Typical time course of the temperature evolution during a heating experiment (a),
with the target temperature (in black) and the measured temperature at the focal point (in
red).
3.8. References
[1] Bloch F. Nuclear induction. Phys Rev 1946;70:460.
[2] Lauterbur PC. Image formation by induced local interactions: examples employing
nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature 1973;242:190-191.
[3] Mansfield P, Grannell PK. NMR 'diffraction' in solids? J Phys C: Solid State Phys
1973;6:L422-L426.
[4] Parker DL, Smith V, Sheldon P, Crooks LE, Fussell L. Temperature distribution
measurements in two-dimensional NMR imaging. Med Phys 1983;10(3):321-325.
[5] Le Bihan D, Delannoy J, Levin RL. Temperature mapping with MR imaging of
molecular diffusion: application to hyperthermia. Radiology 1989;171(3):853-857.
[6] De Poorter J. Noninvasive MRI thermometry with the proton resonance frequency
method: study of susceptibility effects. Magn Reson Med 1995;34(3):359-367.
[7] Ishihara Y, Calderon A, Watanabe H, Okamoto K, Suzuki Y, Kuroda K, Suzuki Y. A
precise and fast temperature mapping using water proton chemical shift. Magn Reson
Med 1995;34(6):814-823.
[8] Quesson B, de Zwart JA, Moonen CT. Magnetic resonance temperature imaging for
guidance of thermotherapy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12(4):525-533.
33
[9] Rieke V, Butts Pauly K. MR thermometry. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27(2):376-
390.
[10] Hindman J. Proton resonance shift of water in the gas and liquid states. J Chem Phys
1966;44:4582–4592.
[11] Ishihara Y, Calderon A, Watanabe H, Mori K, Okamoto K, Suzuki Y, Sato K, Kuroda
K, Nakagawa S, Tsutsumi S. A precise and fast temperature mapping method using
water proton chemical shift.; 1992; Berlin. p 4803.
[12] De Poorter J, De Wagter C, De Deene Y, Thomsen C, Stahlberg F, Achten E.
Noninvasive MRI thermometry with the proton resonance frequency (PRF) method: in
vivo results in human muscle. Magn Reson Med 1995;33(1):74-81.
[13] Kuroda K, Suzuki Y, Ishihara Y, Okamoto K, Suzuki Y. Temperature mapping using
water proton chemical shift obtained with 3D-MRSI: feasibility in vivo. Magn Reson
Med 1996;35(1):20-29.
[14] Fossheim SL, Il'yasov KA, Hennig J, Bjornerud A. Thermosensitive paramagnetic
liposomes for temperature control during MR imaging-guided hyperthermia: in vitro
feasibility studies. Acad Radiol 2000;7(12):1107-1115.
[15] Pakin SK, Hekmatyar SK, Hopewell P, Babsky A, Bansal N. Non-invasive
temperature imaging with thulium 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-
tetramethyl-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (TmDOTMA-). NMR Biomed 2006;19(1):116-
124.
[16] Flanagan SW, Ryan AJ, Gisolfi CV, Moseley PL. Tissue-specific HSP70 response in
animals undergoing heat stress. Am J Physiol 1995;268(1 Pt 2):R28-32.
[17] Morikawa S, Inubushi T, Kurumi Y, Naka S, Sato K, Demura K, Tani T, Haque HA.
Feasibility of respiratory triggering for MR-guided microwave ablation of liver tumors
under general anesthesia. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2004;27(4):370-373.
[18] Denis de Senneville B, Quesson B, Desbarats P, Salomir R, Palussiere J, Moonen
CTW. Atlas-based motion correction for on-line MR temperature mapping.; 2004;
Singapore. p 2571–2574.
[19] Salomir R, Vimeux FC, de Zwart JA, Grenier N, Moonen CT. Hyperthermia by MR-
guided focused ultrasound: accurate temperature control based on fast MRI and a
physical model of local energy deposition and heat conduction. Magn Reson Med
2000;43(3):342-347.
34
[20] Vimeux FC, De Zwart JA, Palussiere J, Fawaz R, Delalande C, Canioni P, Grenier N,
Moonen CT. Real-time control of focused ultrasound heating based on rapid MR
thermometry. Invest Radiol 1999;34(3):190-193.
[21] Mougenot C, Salomir R, Palussiere J, Grenier N, Moonen CT. Automatic spatial and
temporal temperature control for MR-guided focused ultrasound using fast 3D MR
thermometry and multispiral trajectory of the focal point. Magn Reson Med
2004;52(5):1005-1015.
35
Chapter 4. Optical imaging
4.1. Introduction
Next to the established imaging techniques such as nuclear medicine imaging and magnetic
resonance imaging, optical imaging starts playing a growing role in the characterization and
measurement of biological processes at the cellular and molecular level. Monitoring of
biological processes in vivo with fluorescence or bioluminescence imaging is hampered by the
absorption and scattering of light. Labeling the molecules and cells of interest with optical
contrast agent (in the near infrared (NIR) region) can improve the quality of the acquired
optical images. Optical labeling techniques can be broadly divided into three categories: small
organic dyes, quantum dots and reporter genes. A large variety of organic dyes are
commercially available and their application in in vivo imaging studies is growing. When
conjugated covalently to targeting molecules, sensitive (near infrared) contrast agents are
created that can be used for enhanced detection of early cancer [1,2], drug target assessment
[3] and imaging of apoptosis [4]. Quantum dots are semiconductor crystals and provide a new
class of biomarkers that could overcome the limitations of organic dyes such as high
photobleaching and low quantum yield. For the moment most applications of quantum dots
are still in vitro or ex vivo, but the number of in vivo applications is expanding [5].
Both organic dyes and quantum dots are examples of so-called direct imaging techniques
whereby an optical probe that specifically localizes on an intended target reports on the
location and concentration of this target. In contrast, to study gene expression [6-9], gene
regulation [10] and protein-protein interactions [11,12] often an indirect imaging strategy is
used. The most common practice is the introduction of a transgene in the cell. The transgene
encodes for a fluorescent or bioluminescent protein, which acts as an intrinsically produced
reporter probe. Transcription and translation of the gene leads to the production of the
fluorescent or bioluminescent protein, which can then be detected with optical imaging
methods. Therefore, gene expression and regulation is imaged indirectly by visualizing and
quantifying the presence of fluorescent or enzymatic activity of the bioluminescent protein in
tissues. Reporter genes allow also for sensitive, quantitative, real-time spatiotemporal analysis
of the dynamics of neoplastic cell growth and metastasis and their response to therapeutic
intervention [13-16].
36
4.2. Origin of light
In optics, the term light refers to electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths of 300 nm (ultra
violet) through 1400 nm (infrared). Light is composed of elementary particles called photons
and can exhibit properties of both waves and particles. Which description fits best depends on
the interaction and technology used. There are many different light sources, but the
underlying process producing the light is the same. An electron absorbs energy and moves to
a higher orbit. When the electron falls back down to a lower energy state, a packet of energy
(i.e. photon) is released and light emission is observed. Electrons may be excited in a number
of different ways, e.g. by exothermic (bio)chemical reactions (chemi- and bioluminescence)
or by absorption of light (fluorescence). Below fluorescence and bioluminescence are
explained in more detail.
4.2.1. Fluorescence
Fluorescence is the property of some atoms and molecules (known as fluorophores) to absorb
light at a particular wavelength and to subsequently emit light of longer wavelength after a
brief interval, this is illustrated by the simple electronic-state diagram (Jablonski diagram)
shown in Figure 4.1. The fluorescence process is governed by three important events: (1)
excitation, (2) internal conversion and vibrational relaxation and (3) emission. Because the
energy associated with fluorescence emission transitions is typically less than that of
absorption, the resulting emitted photons have less energy and are shifted to longer
wavelengths. This phenomenon is generally known as Stokes shift. The primary origin of the
Stokes shift is the rapid decay of excited electrons to the lowest vibrational energy level of the
first excited state by internal conversion and vibrational relaxation. The entire fluorescence
process described above is cyclical. Therefore, a single fluorophore can generate many
thousands of detectable photons, which is fundamental to the high sensitivity of fluorescence
detection techniques.
Fluorophores can be divided into two broad classes, termed endogenous and exogenous.
Endogenous fluorophores, such as amino acids, structural proteins, enzymes, vitamins and
lipids, are those that occur naturally. Examples of exogenous fluorophores are cyanine dyes,
photosensitizers and molecular markers such as green fluorescent protein (GFP). These are
synthetic dyes or modified biochemicals that are added to a specimen to produce fluorescence
with specific spectral properties. When choosing the best fluorophore for a certain application
several parameters are used to describe and compare different fluorophores: extinction
37
coefficient, quantum yield, excitation and emission wavelength and photostability. The molar
extinction coefficient (ranging from 5000 to 200,000 cm-1 mol-1) is a direct measure of a dye's
ability to absorb light and at the same time determines the amount of light a molecule can
generate via fluorescence emission. The fluorescence quantum yield is a measure of the
efficiency with which the excited molecule is able to convert absorbed light to emitted light. It
is defined as the fraction of absorbed photons that are converted to fluorescence emission.
Typical quantum yields for commonly used fluorophores range from 0.05 to 1.0. For in vivo
imaging of fluorophores it is useful to have a probe that has its excitation and emission
wavelengths in the range of 600 to 900 nm (this is explained in more detail in 4.3).
Photostability is the ability of a dye to undergo repeated cycles of excitation and emission
without undergoing chemical modifications while being in the excited state. Chemical
modification of the excited state dye, referred to as "photobleaching," is an important factor
that limits fluorescence detection under high-intensity illumination.
Figure 4.1 Jablonski diagram illustrating the processes responsible for the fluorescence of
fluorophores. The absorption of a photon of energy hνEX by a fluorophore creates an excited
electronic singlet state, S1’ (event 1). Internal conversion and vibrational relaxation cause the
partial dissipation of the energy in S1’, yielding a relaxed singlet excited state S1 (event 2).
Finally, the fluorophore returns to its ground state (S0) by emitting a photon of energy hνEM
(event 3).
4.2.2. Bioluminescence
Bioluminescence is the production and emission of light as a result of a biochemical reaction
during which chemical energy is converted into light energy. In nature, bioluminescence is
found in many species, particularly in the marine environment, and each species has an
38
independently evolved biochemical system for light production [17]. However, for the in vivo
use of bioluminescence as biomarker the firefly luciferase system is by far the most
commonly used [18,19]. The firefly (Photinus pyralis) luciferase is an enzyme and catalyzes
the oxidation of the substrate luciferin in the presence of the cofactors adenosine triphosphate
(ATP), Mg2+ and O2. The oxidation of luciferin forms oxyluciferin in its electronically excited
state. Oxyluciferin returns to ground state while emitting broadband light in the green to
yellow region (500-700 nm), with a peak emission wavelength at 560 nm (Figure 4.2) [19].
The firefly luciferase system has a couple of properties that make it very useful as reporter
gene, such as its high sensitivity and tight coupling of protein synthesis with enzyme activity.
Furthermore, luciferase is a monomer that does not require any post-translational
modifications; it is available as a mature enzyme directly upon translation from its mRNA.
Hence, the luciferase assay provides a nearly instantaneous measure of total reporter
expression in the cell [20], if not limited by deficient co-factors. The use of firefly luciferase
requires exogenous administration of luciferin (enzyme substrate) to the animal before
imaging. Contag et al. showed that luciferin diffuses within minutes throughout all tissues
after i.v. and i.p. administration and rapidly enters into cells due to its small size and its
zwitter ionic nature [21]. Therefore, the exogenous administration of luciferin is not a limiting
factor for bioluminescence imaging. Notice that the measured luciferase activity changes with
the time after luciferin injection, as well as with dose. Therefore, experiments have to be
performed under constant conditions in order to make a quantitative comparison between the
results possible.
39
Figure 4.2 Firefly (Photinus pyralis, (b)) luciferase catalyzes the light-producing reaction of
luciferin to oxy-luciferin in the presence of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), Mg2+ and O2 (c).
The emitting light is in the range of 500-700 nm, with a peak emission wavelength at 560 nm
(a).
4.2.3. Fluorescence vs. bioluminescence
In the field of in vivo reporter gene technologies, bioluminescence (BLI) has several
advantages over fluorescence (FL). Foremost is the inherent low background of BLI markers
as compared with FL reporters, leading to higher sensitivity. FL suffers from autofluorescence
of tissue, resulting from the use of high power external excitation light source, causing an
increased background signal. Caceres et al. showed a 5-25-fold greater sensitivity in vitro for
luciferase transfected cells than for green fluorescent protein (GFP) transfected cells [22]. The
influence of autofluorescence can be reduced by working in the red to near infrared (NIR)
wavelength range [23], as is shown in Figure 4.3. Additionally, the need to use an external
excitation light source in FL imaging may reduce even further the low signal-to-noise ratio by
photobleaching. Hypothetically BLI signals are more easily quantified than FL signals,
because the signal level observed at a given depth of the animal is directly proportional to the
number of cells. In contrast, in the case of FL, the signal is related to both the number of cells
and the intensity of excitation light, which is difficult to quantify. However, in practice
quantification for both is difficult due to complicating factors such as scattering of light. FL
40
has also a couple advantages over BLI. First of all, it is much brighter and therefore poses
fewer restrictions on the imaging system (see also 4.4). Furthermore, FL can also be used with
a large variety of exogenous contrast agents and it has already found applications in clinical
use [24]. Another interesting evolution in the field of fluorescence is the development of
fluorescence tomography. This technique allows for the 3-D reconstruction of the fluorophore
distribution and improves quantification accuracy [25].
Figure 4.3 Wavelength-dependent autofluorescence during in vivo fluorescence imaging.
Tissue autofluorescence was imaged immediately after sacrifice using three different
excitation/emission filter sets: (a) white light, no filters; (b) blue/green (460-500 nm/505-560
nm); (c) green/red (525-555 nm/590-650 nm); and (d) NIR (725-775 nm/790-830 nm).
Arrows mark the location of the gallbladder (GB), small intestine (SI) and bladder (BI).
Image from [23].
4.3. Interaction light-tissue
If light is sent into tissue, different processes can occur. Most light enters the tissue, but a
small part can be reflected off the tissue surface (depending on the angle of incidence and the
refractive index). Inside the tissue, the light can be absorbed or scattered [26-28].
Light absorption in tissue is strongly wavelength dependent as is illustrated in Figure 4.4,
since different absorbing chromophores, absorb in different wavelength regions. At
wavelengths in the ultraviolet and blue region, oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin, other proteins and
41
amino acids absorb strongly. When working in the red to near-infrared (NIR) wavelength
there is less absorption and thus a deeper penetration of the light into the tissue. However, at a
wavelength of 900 nm and above, water becomes a strong absorber. Thus the optimal optical
window for light penetration tissue is: 600-900 nm (Figure 4.4). The differences in
attenuation relative to wavelength have a couple of important implications when performing
in vivo optical imaging. First, when using reporter molecules that have a part of their emission
spectrum below 600 nm, such as firefly luciferase and GFP, their emitted light will be largely
absorbed by tissue. Figure 4.5 shows that only 30% of the emission spectrum of firefly
luciferase is above 600 nm, which is probably the region of the emission spectrum detected
when used as an in vivo reporter. Notice that in in vivo FL applications not only the emitted
light is absorbed, but also the excitation light. Secondly, the emission spectrum of light
depends on the depth of the light source in the tissue. Therefore, light emitted at the surface of
an animal will contain more of the blue spectrum than light originating from deep within the
animal. Both phenomena complicate quantification of the emitted light in fluorescence and
bioluminescence imaging.
Whereas absorption depends on chromophores in the tissue, scattering is caused by tissue
structures in the order of magnitude of the light wavelength, such as elastin and collagen (i.d.
Rayleigh scattering) and mitochondria, cell nucleus, Golgi apparatus (i.d. Mie scattering).
Scattering decreases monotonically with increasing wavelength. However the ratio of
scattering to absorption coefficient increases with the wavelength. Thus, working in the
optical window (600-900 nm), a significant amount of light can escape the tissue, but the
emitted light is highly diffuse. This makes precise localization and quantification of the
emitted light difficult.
42
Figure 4.4 Interaction of light with tissue. The absorption coefficient of light in tissue is
dependent on wavelength and results from absorbers such as hemoglobins, lipids and water.
From [29].
4.4. Light measurement
The collection and measurement of the emitted photons is done by an image sensor.
Photomultiplier tubes are mostly used in the case of confocal microscopy. Charged coupled
device (CCD) cameras are the most commonly used sensors. CCDs are silicon-based
integrated circuits consisting of a dense matrix of photodiodes that operate by converting light
into defined electric charges. Electrons generated by the interaction of photons with silicon
atoms are stored in a potential well and can subsequently be transferred across the chip
through registers and output to an amplifier for storage as an electric image on a computer.
Because CCDs are used in very low light circumstances (in case of BLI), a very high
efficiency and sensitivity is needed. The quantum efficiency of a CCD, which is the ratio
between the number of photons absorbed and the number of electrons created, can reach
values up to 90% in the visual spectrum. The sensitivity of CCDs is optimized by reducing all
noise sources, such as dark current and read-out noise.
43
Figure 4.5 Wavelength dependent emission spectrum during in vivo bioluminescence imaging.
Bioluminescence images were taken of the same mouse with luciferase transfected tumor cells
implanted on its back with different emission filters: (a) no filter; (b) band pass filter (535-
580 nm); and (c) long pass filter (from 610) nm. 60% of the detected light is emitted in the
region at wavelengths longer than 610 nm. (From J.L. Coll, )
44
4.5. References
[1] Becker A, Hessenius C, Licha K, Ebert B, Sukowski U, Semmler W, Wiedenmann B,
Grotzinger C. Receptor-targeted optical imaging of tumors with near-infrared
fluorescent ligands. Nat Biotechnol 2001;19(4):327-331.
[2] Weissleder R, Tung CH, Mahmood U, Bogdanov A, Jr. In vivo imaging of tumors
with protease-activated near-infrared fluorescent probes. Nat Biotechnol
1999;17(4):375-378.
[3] Bremer C, Tung CH, Weissleder R. In vivo molecular target assessment of matrix
metalloproteinase inhibition. Nat Med 2001;7(6):743-748.
[4] Petrovsky A, Schellenberger E, Josephson L, Weissleder R, Bogdanov A, Jr. Near-
infrared fluorescent imaging of tumor apoptosis. Cancer Res 2003;63(8):1936-1942.
[5] Michalet X, Pinaud FF, Bentolila LA, Tsay JM, Doose S, Li JJ, Sundaresan G, Wu
AM, Gambhir SS, Weiss S. Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo imaging, and
diagnostics. Science 2005;307(5709):538-544.
[6] Bhaumik S, Gambhir SS. Optical imaging of Renilla luciferase reporter gene
expression in living mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99(1):377-382.
[7] Wu JC, Sundaresan G, Iyer M, Gambhir SS. Noninvasive optical imaging of firefly
luciferase reporter gene expression in skeletal muscles of living mice. Mol Ther
2001;4(4):297-306.
[8] Yang M, Baranov E, Moossa AR, Penman S, Hoffman RM. Visualizing gene
expression by whole-body fluorescence imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2000;97(22):12278-12282.
[9] van Roessel P, Brand AH. Imaging into the future: visualizing gene expression and
protein interactions with fluorescent proteins. Nat Cell Biol 2002;4(1):E15-20.
[10] Ichikawa T, Hogemann D, Saeki Y, Tyminski E, Terada K, Weissleder R, Chiocca
EA, Basilion JP. MRI of transgene expression: correlation to therapeutic gene
expression. Neoplasia 2002;4(6):523-530.
[11] Massoud TF, Paulmurugan R, De A, Ray P, Gambhir SS. Reporter gene imaging of
protein-protein interactions in living subjects. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2007;18(1):31-37.
[12] Ray P, Pimenta H, Paulmurugan R, Berger F, Phelps ME, Iyer M, Gambhir SS.
Noninvasive quantitative imaging of protein-protein interactions in living subjects.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99(5):3105-3110.
45
[13] Edinger M, Sweeney TJ, Tucker AA, Olomu AB, Negrin RS, Contag CH.
Noninvasive assessment of tumor cell proliferation in animal models. Neoplasia
1999;1(4):303-310.
[14] Sweeney TJ, Mailander V, Tucker AA, Olomu AB, Zhang W, Cao Y, Negrin RS,
Contag CH. Visualizing the kinetics of tumor-cell clearance in living animals. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96(21):12044-12049.
[15] Chishima T, Yang M, Miyagi Y, Li L, Tan Y, Baranov E, Shimada H, Moossa AR,
Penman S, Hoffman RM. Governing step of metastasis visualized in vitro. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A 1997;94(21):11573-11576.
[16] Yang M, Baranov E, Wang JW, Jiang P, Wang X, Sun FX, Bouvet M, Moossa AR,
Penman S, Hoffman RM. Direct external imaging of nascent cancer, tumor
progression, angiogenesis, and metastasis on internal organs in the fluorescent
orthotopic model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99(6):3824-3829.
[17] Hastings JW. Chemistries and colors of bioluminescent reactions: a review. Gene
1996;173(1 Spec No):5-11.
[18] de Wet JR, Wood KV, DeLuca M, Helinski DR, Subramani S. Firefly luciferase gene:
structure and expression in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 1987;7(2):725-737.
[19] de Wet JR, Wood KV, Helinski DR, DeLuca M. Cloning of firefly luciferase cDNA
and the expression of active luciferase in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1985;82(23):7870-7873.
[20] Wood KV. The chemistry of bioluminescent reporter assays. Promega notes 1998:14-
21.
[21] Contag CH, Spilman SD, Contag PR, Oshiro M, Eames B, Dennery P, Stevenson DK,
Benaron DA. Visualizing gene expression in living mammals using a bioluminescent
reporter. Photochem Photobiol 1997;66(4):523-531.
[22] Caceres G, Zhu XY, Jiao JA, Zankina R, Aller A, Andreotti P. Imaging of luciferase
and GFP-transfected human tumours in nude mice. Luminescence 2003;18(4):218-
223.
[23] Frangioni JV. In vivo near-infrared fluorescence imaging. Curr Opin Chem Biol
2003;7(5):626-634.
[24] Ito S, Muguruma N, Kimura T, Yano H, Imoto Y, Okamoto K, Kaji M, Sano S, Nagao
Y. Principle and clinical usefulness of the infrared fluorescence endoscopy. J Med
Invest 2006;53(1-2):1-8.
46
[25] Ntziachristos V. Fluorescence molecular imaging. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2006;8:1-
33.
[26] Cheong WF, Prahl SA, Welch AJ. A review of the optical properties of biological
tissues. IEEE J Quantum Electron 1990;26:2166-2185.
[27] Rice BW, Cable MD, Nelson MB. In vivo imaging of light-emitting probes. J Biomed
Opt 2001;6(4):432-440.
[28] Tuchin V. Tissue optics: light scattering methods and instruments for medical
diagnosis: International society for optical engineering; 2000.
[29] Shah K, Weissleder R. Molecular optical imaging: applications leading to the
development of present day therapeutics. NeuroRx 2005;2(2):215-225.
49
Chapter 5. Regulatable gene expression systems
5.1. Introduction
The objective of gene therapy is to express a therapeutic gene in the region where therapy is
required and for the duration necessary to achieve a therapeutic effect and to minimize
systemic toxicity. Although a lot of progress has been made in developing vectors for targeted
delivery of genes, it looks quite unlikely that delivery vectors emerge that are specific for a
certain tissue, organs or regions in need of therapy (except perhaps those based on cells with
“natural” homing capabilities such as immune cells and stem cells). Improvements in gene
delivery and spatio-temporal control of gene expression are important requirements in order
to introduce gene therapy in the clinical environment. Several approaches for controlling gene
expression have been proposed in literature [1]. Tissue-specific or disease-specific promoters
can provide spatial control of gene expression [2,3], whereas small molecule-dependent gene
switches, such as tetracycline[4,5], mifepristone [6,7] and rapamycin [8,9], can give temporal
control. Alternatively, physical stimuli such as ionizing radiation [10] and heat [11] offer the
possibility to activate gene expression in deep tissue with excellent spatial definition and
allow temporal control of the start of gene activation. The time course of activation and
subsequent deactivation of the promoters, which respond to these physical stimuli, may be
viewed as a basal form of temporal control. However, this form of temporal control is an
intrinsic property of the promoter and can not be manipulated readily to generate a desired
temporal expression profile that would result in an optimal therapy. Deliberate control of both
spatial and temporal regulation may be obtained via the use of two- or three component
systems (Figure 5.1) comprising (i) a small molecule dependent transactivator whose
expression is placed under the dual control of an inducible promoter and a transactivator-
responsive promoter and (ii) a transactivator-responsive promoter to which a transgene of
interest is linked [12]. With these multi-component systems not only spatial and temporal
control of gene expression is achieved, but also unintentional activation can be prevented.
50
Figure 5.1 Heat-activated and small molecule ligand-dependent three component gene switch
comprising two copies of a transactivator gene, of which one is controlled by an hsp promoter
and the other by a transactivator-responsive promoter (trp), and a transactivator-responsive
promoter to which a transgene of interest is linked. The arrow pointing to the right indicates
transactivator turnover. Adapted from [1].
As ionizing radiation may be a limiting factor when repeated activation is required, heat
appears to be the more suitable approach for controlling local gene expression. The objective
of this part of the thesis is to demonstrate the possibility of spatial and temporal control of
transgene expression using MR guided HIFU in combination with a temperature sensitive Hsp
promoter. Heat shock proteins (Hsps) are part of a family of proteins, whose synthesis is
elevated in response to stress. Combining the Hsp promoter with a reporter gene (e.g.
51
luciferase or green fluorescent protein) allows deliberate activation and kinetic follow-up of
the reporter gene. A general introduction in the biology of heat shock proteins and
applications of the Hsp promoter in gene therapy is described in Chapter 6. The promoter’s
activity was assessed with respect to temperature and duration of hyperthermia in vitro as well
as in vivo, which is presented in Chapter 7 and Chapter 8, respectively. Finally, in Chapter 9
the in vivo local activation of a transgene under control of Hsp promoter using MRgHIFU is
presented.
5.2. References
[1] Vilaboa N, Voellmy R. Regulatable gene expression systems for gene therapy. Curr
Gene Ther 2006;6(4):421-438.
[2] Gorski K, Carneiro M, Schibler U. Tissue-specific in vitro transcription from the
mouse albumin promoter. Cell 1986;47(5):767-776.
[3] Melo LG, Gnecchi M, Pachori AS, Kong D, Wang K, Liu X, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ.
Endothelium-targeted gene and cell-based therapies for cardiovascular disease.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004;24(10):1761-1774.
[4] Gossen M, Bujard H. Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by
tetracycline-responsive promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89(12):5547-5551.
[5] Rendahl KG, Leff SE, Otten GR, Spratt SK, Bohl D, Van Roey M, Donahue BA,
Cohen LK, Mandel RJ, Danos O, Snyder RO. Regulation of gene expression in vivo
following transduction by two separate rAAV vectors. Nat Biotechnol
1998;16(8):757-761.
[6] Wang Y, DeMayo FJ, Tsai SY, O'Malley BW. Ligand-inducible and liver-specific
target gene expression in transgenic mice. Nat Biotechnol 1997;15(3):239-243.
[7] Wang Y, O'Malley BW, Jr., Tsai SY, O'Malley BW. A regulatory system for use in
gene transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994;91(17):8180-8184.
[8] Rivera VM, Clackson T, Natesan S, Pollock R, Amara JF, Keenan T, Magari SR,
Phillips T, Courage NL, Cerasoli F, Jr., Holt DA, Gilman M. A humanized system for
pharmacologic control of gene expression. Nat Med 1996;2(9):1028-1032.
[9] Ye X, Rivera VM, Zoltick P, Cerasoli F, Jr., Schnell MA, Gao G, Hughes JV, Gilman
M, Wilson JM. Regulated delivery of therapeutic proteins after in vivo somatic cell
gene transfer. Science 1999;283(5398):88-91.
52
[10] Hallahan DE, Mauceri HJ, Seung LP, Dunphy EJ, Wayne JD, Hanna NN, Toledano A,
Hellman S, Kufe DW, Weichselbaum RR. Spatial and temporal control of gene
therapy using ionizing radiation. Nat Med 1995;1(8):786-791.
[11] Madio DP, van Gelderen P, DesPres D, Olson AW, de Zwart JA, Fawcett TW,
Holbrook NJ, Mandel M, Moonen CT. On the feasibility of MRI-guided focused
ultrasound for local induction of gene expression. J Magn Reson Imaging
1998;8(1):101-104.
[12] Vilaboa N, Fenna M, Munson J, Roberts SM, Voellmy R. Novel gene switches for
targeted and timed expression of proteins of interest. Mol Ther 2005;12(2):290-298.
53
Chapter 6. Heat shock proteins
6.1. Introduction
Heat shock proteins (Hsp) are present in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Their highly
conserved primary structure (60-78% similarities in eukaryotes) suggests that they play a
crucial role in cellular processes [1]. Hsps are constitutively expressed in cells under normal
conditions for which they function as molecular chaperons [2]. They play a critical role in
normal protein homeostasis to assist in protein folding [3,4], the assembly and disassembly of
protein complexes [5], inhibition of improper protein aggregation [6,7] and to direct newly
formed proteins to target organelles for final packaging, degradation or repair. In response to
stress some forms of Hsp can be up regulated and they assist in refolding and repair of
denaturized proteins as well as facilitating synthesis of new proteins to repair damage [8]. The
induction of Hsp production is initiated by stressful conditions such as hyperthermia [9],
ischemia [10], hypoxia [11], depletion of ATP [12], free radicals [13] and various viruses.
The stress response is evoked primarily in response to the presence of damaged molecules
[14]. The proposed mechanism of stress-induced increase in Hsps is illustrated in Figure 6.1.
Under normal conditions heat shock factors (HSF) are bound to Hsps and are inactive. Under
stress conditions, such as heat shock, HSFs are separated from the Hsps. Protein kinase or
other serine/threonine kinases phosphorylate the HSFs, which cause them to form trimers in
the cytosol [15]. The trimers enter the nucleus and bind to the heat-shock elements (HSE)
located on the promoter region of the Hsp genes, and become further phosphorylated by HSF
kinases. Hsp mRNA is transcribed, transported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and
translated into Hsp proteins. The newly synthesized Hsps bind to HSFs to prevent further
synthesis of Hsps. The above described pathway and associated feedback control mechanism
for the expression and regulation of Hsps is just a general description of this in vivo process.
In the context of this thesis, a lot of details are left out for clarity or are still unknown such as
how the basal level of Hsps is maintained in non-stress conditions or how the rate of Hsp
synthesis is upgraded in proportion to the nature and magnitude of the stress loading.
54
Figure 6.1 Proposed mechanism of stress-induced increase in Hsps. HSFs residing in the
cytosol are normally bound by Hsp and are inactive. Under stress, such as heat shock, HSFs
separate from Hsp, are phosphorylated by protein kinases such as PKC, and form trimers in
cytosol that enter the nucleus to bind HSEs in the promoter region of Hsp gene. HSF is
phosphorylated further, and Hsp mRNA is transcribed and leaves the nucleus for cytosol. In
cytosol, new Hsp is synthesized. HSF returns to the cytosol and is bound once again by HSF.
From [1].
6.2. Hsp promoters in gene therapy
Hsp promoters, particularly Hsp70 promoters, have been quite often used for gene therapy
strategies because they are both heat-inducible and efficient. Notice that not all Hsp70
promoters are inducible, though in the remainder of this thesis we will use Hsp70
promoter/protein to indicate the inducible form of Hsp70 promoter/protein if not stated
otherwise. Further, Hsp70’s almost universally presence in cells from bacteria to humans
makes it possible that virtually any Hsp70 promoter from any eukaryotic organism may be
used in any eukaryotic host cell [16,17]. This property is quite convenient for gene therapy
because strategies can be achieved with Hsp promoters from different species and tested in
different cellular and animal models. Although, the Hsp70 promoter looks very promising for
gene therapy, we have to keep in mind that some limitations do exist such as uncontrolled
55
activation of Hsp70 promoter, thermotolerance and the need for temporal and spatial control
of activation. As mentioned before, the Hsp70 promoter can be stimulated by a variety of
stresses of both environmental and physiological origins. The construction of a minimal
Hsp70 promoter, containing only three elements, solved largely the problem of uncontrolled
activation, because this promoter is believed to respond almost exclusively to heat [18,19].
Additional control could be obtained by rendering the Hsp promoter activation dependent on
an exogenous agent. The phenomenon of thermotolerance is discussed in more detail in
Chapter 8 and the temporal and spatial control of gene activation is the main subject of
Chapter 9.
6.3. References
[1] Kiang JG, Tsokos GC. Heat shock protein 70 kDa: molecular biology, biochemistry,
and physiology. Pharmacol Ther 1998;80(2):183-201.
[2] Freeman BC, Michels A, Song J, Kampinga HH, Morimoto RI. Analysis of molecular
chaperone activities using in vitro and in vivo approaches. Methods Mol Biol
2000;99:393-419.
[3] Saibil H. Molecular chaperones: containers and surfaces for folding, stabilising or
unfolding proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2000;10(2):251-258.
[4] Zimmerman SB, Minton AP. Macromolecular crowding: biochemical, biophysical,
and physiological consequences. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1993;22:27-65.
[5] Schroder M, Kaufman RJ. The mammalian unfolded protein response. Annu Rev
Biochem 2005;74:739-789.
[6] Ellis RJ. Molecular chaperones: avoiding the crowd. Curr Biol 1997;7(9):R531-533.
[7] Ohtsuka K, Hata M. Molecular chaperone function of mammalian Hsp70 and Hsp40--
a review. Int J Hyperthermia 2000;16(3):231-245.
[8] Martin J, Horwich AL, Hartl FU. Prevention of protein denaturation under heat stress
by the chaperonin Hsp60. Science 1992;258(5084):995-998.
[9] Ostberg JR, Kaplan KC, Repasky EA. Induction of stress proteins in a panel of mouse
tissues by fever-range whole body hyperthermia. Int J Hyperthermia 2002;18(6):552-
562.
[10] Richard V, Kaeffer N, Thuillez C. Delayed protection of the ischemic heart--from
pathophysiology to therapeutic applications. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 1996;10(5):409-
415.
56
[11] Patel B, Khaliq A, Jarvis-Evans J, Boulton M, Arrol S, Mackness M, McLeod D.
Hypoxia induces HSP 70 gene expression in human hepatoma (HEP G2) cells.
Biochem Mol Biol Int 1995;36(4):907-912.
[12] Kabakov AE, Gabai VL. Heat-shock proteins maintain the viability of ATP-deprived
cells: what is the mechanism? Trends Cell Biol 1994;4(6):193-196.
[13] Kukreja RC, Kontos MC, Loesser KE, Batra SK, Qian YZ, Gbur CJ, Jr., Naseem SA,
Jesse RL, Hess ML. Oxidant stress increases heat shock protein 70 mRNA in isolated
perfused rat heart. Am J Physiol 1994;267(6 Pt 2):H2213-2219.
[14] Kultz D. Molecular and evolutionary basis of the cellular stress response. Annu Rev
Physiol 2005;67:225-257.
[15] Kroeger PE, Sarge KD, Morimoto RI. Mouse heat shock transcription factors 1 and 2
prefer a trimeric binding site but interact differently with the HSP70 heat shock
element. Mol Cell Biol 1993;13(6):3370-3383.
[16] Pelham HR. A regulatory upstream promoter element in the Drosophila hsp 70 heat-
shock gene. Cell 1982;30(2):517-528.
[17] Voellmy R, Rungger D. Transcription of a Drosophila heat shock gene is heat-induced
in Xenopus oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1982;79(6):1776-1780.
[18] Leung TK, Rajendran MY, Monfries C, Hall C, Lim L. The human heat-shock protein
family. Expression of a novel heat-inducible HSP70 (HSP70B') and isolation of its
cDNA and genomic DNA. Biochem J 1990;267(1):125-132.
[19] Smith RC, Machluf M, Bromley P, Atala A, Walsh K. Spatial and temporal control of
transgene expression through ultrasound-mediated induction of the heat shock protein
70B promoter in vivo. Hum Gene Ther 2002;13(6):697-706.
57
Chapter 7. In vitro characterization of Hsp70
promoter
7.1. Introduction
From the general introduction of Hsp proteins in Chapter 6 it follows that the promoter region
of the Hsp70 gene functions as a temperature dependent switch for turning on the production
of the Hsp70 protein. This temperature sensitive gene activation is an interesting
characteristic for controlling therapeutic gene expression with local heating. The first results
of heat-activated gene therapy for treating human cancers have already been published. In
these studies a herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-tk) was placed under control of
Hsp promoter for treating gastric cancer [1] and breast cancer [2,3] with a combined therapy
of hyperthermia and ganciclovir. The thymidine kinase phosphorylates the nontoxic prodrug
ganciclovir, which then becomes phosphorylated by endogenous kinases to ganciclovir-
triphosphate, causing DNA-damage related apoptosis.
There are a couple of characteristics that make the Hsp70 promoter very suitable for gene
therapy in cancer treatment as described above, but also for treating genetic disorders such as
cystic fibrosis [4]. Several in vitro studies showed that the inducible human Hsp70 promoter
(Hsp70B) has a low basal activity and a high heat-induced expression amplification [5,6]. In
addition, its magnitude of induction depends on temperature as well as duration of the
induced hyperthermia [7,8]. Similar Hsp70 promoter characteristics were reported in vivo in a
number of organs, such as skin [8], muscle [9], prostate [10] and liver [11] that were
genetically modified using either a virus or plasmid to express a reporter gene under the
control of the human Hsp70 promoter.
In general, the local concentration of therapeutic gene determines the efficacy of the therapy.
When using therapeutic genes, such as HSV-tk, under control of a Hsp promoter for gene
therapy, their local concentration depends on the activity of the Hsp promoter and the efficacy
of gene delivery. The objective of this chapter is to assess the promoter’s activity with respect
to the temperature and duration of hyperthermia. The characterization of the exogenous
mouse Hsp70 promoter’s activity with respect to temperature and duration of hyperthermia
was performed on homogeneous bone marrow cell suspensions obtained from femoral bone
of NLF-1 mice. NLF-1 mice contain a transgene that allows firefly luciferase expression
58
under control of the heat shock protein 70 promoter (Hspa1b). Beckham et al. showed that the
bioluminescent light emission (i.e. luciferase activity) is a reliable method for quantifying
Hsp70 promoter’s activity by correlating the results of an ELISA Hsp70 protein concentration
determination and photon counts after heating [12].
In clinical applications of gene therapy, using hyperthermia in combination with a heat
sensitive promoter, normalization of time-temperature data is very important for obtaining
reproducible results and efficient therapeutic effects since both depend on temporal (duration
of heat up and cool down phase) and spatial (tissue inhomogeneities) variations of
temperature. A nowadays general accepted method for normalizing time-at-temperature data
was introduced by Sapareto and Dewey in 1984 [13]. They proposed a thermodynamic
approach that leads to calculating a thermal iso-effect dose (TID), which is the heating
duration at some reference temperature, e.g. 43º C, required for an observed biological effect
induced by a specified time at a specified temperature. Their method was based on Arrhenius
analyses of cell killing during exposure to heat at different temperatures and for different
exposure times [14,15]. The Arrhenius integral describes the measure of thermal damage as
function of temperature and time of exposure:
( ) τdeAtC
Ct
t
o
RT
Ea
∫−
=
=Ω 0ln)( 7-1
where Ω is the tissue damage, defined as the natural logarithm of a ratio of the concentration
of native (undamaged) tissue before heating (C0) to the concentration of native tissue after
heating (C(t)), A is the frequency factor (s-1), Ea is the activation energy (J·mol-1), T is the
temperature of exposure (K) and R is the universal gas constant (R = 8,32 J·mol-1·K-1).
The relationship between thermal damage and temperature is usually illustrated by an
Arrhenius plot in which the logarithm of the thermal damage is plotted as function of the
inverse absolute temperature [16]. The activation energy, Ea, is determined from the slope of
the Arrhenius plot. Several studies obtained a straight line over the temperature range from
43,5 to 57º C with an activation energy of about 140 kcal·mol-1 [17,18], indicating that for an
iso-effect at various temperatures, a decrease of 1º C requires an increase of the hyperthermic
exposure time by a factor K. Dewey et al. showed that this factor K can be calculated from the
activation energy expressed in joules per mol as follows [19]. Iso-effect at different
temperature implies:
21 Ω=Ω 7-2
59
with Ω1 tissue damage at temperature T and with Ω2 tissue damage at temperature T-1. Using
the Arrhenius integral from equation 7-1 and assuming constant temperature this leads to:
( ) KteAteA TR
E
RT
E aa
⋅⋅⋅=⋅⋅ −−−
1 7-3
With K as factor that indicates the required increase in exposure time to obtain iso-effect
when the temperature is lowered with 1º C. Equation 7-3 can be re-written as follows:
)1()ln(
−+−=
TR
E
RT
EK aa 7-4
Leading to the following expression for K:
)1()ln(
−=
TRT
EK a 7-5
For an activation energy of 586 kJ/mol (≈ 140 kcal/mol) this leads to a factor K of 2. With this
Arrhenius method time-temperature data can be normalized by a simple equation [19]:
( )2112
TTKtt −×= 7-6
Where t1 is the time at temperature T1, t2 is the time at temperature T2 and K is a constant
value with a value around 2. When the temperature varies during a heating period, the time-
temperature relationship in equation 7-6 can be used to obtain an equivalent time at 43º C for
each time interval at a given temperature and the equivalent times at 43º C for all intervals
during the heating period can be summed to give the total equivalent time at 43º C for the
entire heating period. This leads to the thermal iso-effect dose (TID) as proposed by Sapareto
and Dewey in 1984:
Equivalent minutes at 43º C = EM43 = τdKt
Tt∫−
0
43 7-7
Sapareto and Dewey also found that K is about 2 for temperatures > 43º C and about 4-6 for
temperatures between 39 and 43º C. The change in slope of the Arrhenius plot (i.e. different
K-factors) is generally thought to be related to development of thermotolerance during heating
[20].
It should be noted that in most studies the Arrhenius formulation was used for analyzing
temperature induced, biophysical tissue damage (i.e. using direct measurements of protein
denaturation or necrosis). Therefore, Ω has been interpreted as a measure of thermal damage
with a value of Ω = 1 that is usually taken to coincide with the threshold of observable
damage. However, the objective of this study is to investigate if luciferase activity (i.e. Hsp70
promoter activity) also follows the Arrhenius relationship without causing thermal tissue
60
damage. Although several studies showed that Hsp70 promoter activity could be modulated
by changing the thermal dose, they never showed the exact relationship between promoter
activity and thermal dose. The hypothesis in this study is that Hsp promoter activity follows
an Arrhenius relationship. The performed Arrhenius analysis was similar to the analyses
based on tissue damage, though the maximum luciferase activity (i.e. maximum light
emission) observed after heating was chosen as the arbitrary endpoint corresponding to Ω = 1.
7.2. Materials & methods
Bone marrow cell extraction
The mouse Hsp70 promoter was characterized in vitro using bone marrow cells of NLF-1
mice. Animals were first anesthetized (2 % isoflurane in air) and then rapidly decapitated.
Bone marrow cells were flushed out of the femoral bone shafts using RPMI-1640 medium
(Invitrogen) supplemented with 2 % Fetal Calf Serum (FCS, Invitrogen). Bone marrow
mononuclear cells were isolated on ficoll by centrifugation (400 g, 20 min) and washed 3
times in RPMI-1640 + 10 % FCS (300 g, 5 min). Cells were counted and seeded (7.0·106
cells·ml-1) in RPMI (at ambient temperature) supplemented with 10 % FCS and mIL-3 (5
ng·ml-1). By using bone marrow cells from NLF-1 mice the similar promoter is used for in
vitro (this chapter) as well as in vivo (Chapter 8) characterization of the Hsp promoter’s
activity.
Heating
Immediately after cell extraction the cells were heated at different temperatures and for
different durations using a thermal cycler (T gradient, Biometra, Germany). Fifty µl of cell
suspension (3.5·105 cells) was loaded in thin-walled plastic tubes, assuring an even
distribution of the heat in the sample. The pre-programmed heating profile of the thermal
cycler consisted of an adaptation phase of 10 min at 37° C, a heating phase with different
temperature-time combinations and a recuperation phase of 10 min at 37° C. Finally the cell
samples were opened and incubated at 37° C in a 5 % CO2 incubator. Using a thermal cycler
machine for heating cell samples provides fast active heating (4° C/s) and cooling (3° C/s)
assuring a tight temporal control of the sample at elevated temperatures and allows testing of
several heating conditions at the same time. However, the use of a thermal cycler for heating
is only possible with cells in suspension and not with adherent cells.
61
Two series of heating experiments were carried out in this study. In the first series of
experiments, the influence of different heating protocols on the cell viability and the time
course of luciferase activity were investigated. Therefore, cell samples were heated for 16 min
at 43º C, 8 min at 44º C and 4 min at 45º C and analyzed for their cell viability and light
emission during a period of 7 hours with 1 hour intervals. These experiments were repeated
three times, each time with bone marrow cells originating from different NLF-1 mice. In the
second series of experiments, the luciferase activity with respect to temperature and duration
of hyperthermia was measured. For this reason light emission was measured 5 hours after
heating cell samples at six different durations (1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 32 min) and at four different
temperatures (42, 43, 44 and 45° C, ).
Cell viability
Cell viability was measured using trypan blue exclusion dye. The reactivity of trypan blue is
based on the fact that the chromophore is negatively charged and does not interact with the
cell unless the membrane is damaged. Therefore, all the cells which exclude the dye are
viable. 25 µl of cell suspensions was gently mixed with 50 µl trypan blue and 25 µl PBS in an
appropriate tube. 25 µl of stained cell was placed in a hemocytometer and the number of
viable (unstained) cells was counted.
Luciferase light measurement
The luciferase activity was measured 5 hours post heating using the luciferase assay system
(Promega) and a luminometer apparatus (Berthold, Germany). Forty-eight µl of cell
suspension was lysed with 12 µl CCLR lysis buffer (5x). Fifty µl of luciferase assay reagent
was mixed with 5 µl cell lysate in luminometer tubes and mixed by flushing 2-3 times. The
tubes were placed in the luminometer and 10 s reading was started 10 s after mixing the
reagent with the cell lysate.
Arrhenius analysis
To investigate Hsp70 promoter activity as function of time and temperature, six different
durations (1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 32 minutes) of thermal cycler experiments were performed, each
having four samples at different temperatures (42, 43, 44 and 45° C). To find the activation
energy (Ea) and frequency factor (A) values in equation 7-1 that best describe the
experimental values, a least square fit was performed. This least square fit allowed to find a
minimal difference between the experimental values of Ω and the theoretical values of Ω,
which were calculated by varying the activation energy between 0 and 5·106 J·mol-1 with a
62
step size of 1000 J·mol-1 and varying the natural logarithm of the frequency factor between
100 and 900 with a step size of 4.
A second, more classical method, performed to calculate the activation energy and frequency
rate, is based on the linearization of equation 7-1 by projecting the different exposure times on
one point, or in other words assuming a constant temperature exposure. This results into the
following linear Arrhenius relationship:
RT
EAt a+−=− )ln()ln()ln( ω 7-8
When ln(t)-ln(ω) is plotted versus 1/T, a linear fit can be applied to the data. The slope and y-
intercept of the linear fit were obtained to calculate Ea and A.
7.3. Results
Cell viability was determined, using trypan blue, at multiple time points after applying
different heating protocols (i.e. 16 min at 43º C, 8 min at 44º C and 4 min at 45º C). For all
three protocols cell viability remained constant during the first 5 hours after heating and
decreased significantly after 6 to 7 hours, as shown in Figure 7.1. The severe drop in cell
viability after 6 hours and the recovery of the cell viability one hour later for the case of 16
min heating at 43º C can not be explained by the author. In case of the 16 min heating at 43º C
the cell viability was above 80 % and for the other two cases the cell viability remained
between 70 and 80 % during the first 5 hours after heating.
63
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1 2 3 4 5 6 7time after heating (h)
live
cells
(%
)16 min @ 43º C
8 min @ 44º C
4 min @ 45º C
Figure 7.1 Cell viability following 16 min heating at 43° C, 8 min heating at 44° C and 4 min
heating at 45° C measured every hour for a period of 7 hours after heating, with an interval
of 1 hour.
Figure 7.2 shows the relative light units (RLU) measured in a luminometer at different time
points after applying the heating protocols as described above. In Figure 7.2a the time course
of luciferase activity, expressed in RLU values, is shown. The peak in light emission is found
3-5 hours after heating. The light emission levels for the three different heating protocols are
comparable during the period of 7 hours. In Figure 7.2b the time course of luciferase activity,
expressed in RLU per viable cell, is shown. This figure also shows a transient luciferase
activity, with a maximum light expression measured 3-5 hours after heating, ignoring the
outer layer at 6 hours after heating for 16 min at 43º C. There is no significant difference in
light emission levels observed between the three different heating protocols.
64
Figure 7.2 Time course of luciferase activity from bone marrow cells from NLF-1 mice
submitted in vitro to 3 different heating protocols. Luciferase activity is expressed by RLU
measured with a luminometer (a) and normalized to the number of viable cells (b).
Figure 7.3 shows the heat-mediated induction of the Hsp promoter with respect to different
temperatures (42, 43, 44 and 45° C) and durations (1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 32 minutes) of
hyperthermia indicated by luciferase activity. It is shown that expression of the reporter gene
can be modulated by the heating parameters. At 42° C, a weak expression is observed for
heating durations longer than 16 minutes only. At 43° C and 44° C, higher levels of
expression are observed with maximal intensities observed for 32 minutes and 16 minutes
heating, respectively. For these heating protocols a 52/53 fold increase in light emission was
measured compared to the non-heated control sample (i.e. 0 minutes heating). The levels of
emitted light remain comparable for these two temperatures upon reduction of relative
exposure times (i.e. 16 minutes at 43° C / 8 minutes at 44° C). At 45° C, the maximum light
intensity (obtained at 8 minutes) was lower (39 fold increase compared to control) than for
43° C and 44° C and decreased to zero with increasing exposure time. Light emission
decreased also to zero when increasing exposure time from 16 to 32 minutes at 44° C. The
decreased light intensities may be explained by the decreased viability at higher temperatures.
65
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
0 1 2 4 8 16 32
heating duration (min)
RL
U42º C
43º C
44º C
45º C
Figure 7.3 Luciferase activity as an indicator of Hsp70 promoter activity in bone marrow
cells from NLF-1 mice, 5 hours after in vitro heating at different temperatures (42° C, 43° C,
44° C and 45° C) and for different durations (0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 32 min). Luciferase activity
was measured as emitted light using an in vitro enzymatic assay.
In order to investigate whether the luciferase activity (and thus the promoter activity) follows
an Arrhenius relationship the activation energy (Ea) and the frequency factor (A) described in
equation 7-1 were obtained by performing a least square fit between the experimental data
(i.e. Figure 7.3) and the theoretical data (χ2 = 6,0) . The resulting activation energy and
frequency factor are 630,000 J·mol-1 and 1.7·10104 s-1, respectively. An alternative analysis of
the data is shown in Figure 7.4. In this case the relationship between the luciferase activity
and temperature is illustrated by a ‘classical’ Arrhenius plot in which the logarithm of the
luciferase activity is plotted as function of the inverse absolute temperature [16]. The
activation energy (Ea) is determined from the slope of the Arrhenius plot and the frequency
factor (A) is determined from the y-intercept of the slope. The correlation coefficient of the
linear fit equaled 0.9986 indicating that experimental values followed an Arrhenius
relationship. The resulting activation energy and frequency factor of this method are 647,577
J·mol-1 and 2.3·10103 s-1, respectively. For both methods the experimental data points where
cell death reduces luciferase activity and therefore impedes quantitative analysis of Hsp70
promoter activity, are not taken into account (i.e. 32 min at 44° C and 16 and 32 min at 45°
C).
66
Figure 7.4 ‘Classical’ Arrhenius plot for constant-temperature in vitro water bath
experiments performed at different temperature (42, 43, 44 and 45° C). The error bars
represent the standard deviation of the averages for each temperature. The solid line is a
linear fit with error weighting performed in order to determine the activation energy and
frequency factor.
Equation 7-5 was used to calculate the factor K that indicates by which factor the
hyperthermic exposure time has to be increased to obtain an iso-effect at various
temperatures, when the temperature is decreased by 1° C. The resulting K factors for the least
square fit and the classical analysis are 2.11 and 2.16, respectively.
Figure 7.5 shows a simulation of iso-luciferase activity levels based on the values for
activation energy and frequency factor calculated from the least square fit. As explained in
materials & methods the combination of time and temperature corresponding to the highest
luciferase activity in Figure 7.3 (16 minutes at 44° C) coincides with the iso-level of 1.0 in
Figure 7.5.
67
Figure 7.5 Iso-activation plot calculated from the activation energy (630,000 J/mol) and
frequency factor (e240 s-1) values obtained with a least square fit of the experimental and
theoretical data. The activation was normalized to the experimental data point that resulted in
the highest luciferase activity, which is 960 seconds at 44° C.
7.4. Discussion
The in vitro characterization shows that the thermo-inducible Hsp70 mouse promoter
possesses the same features as the thermo-inducible Hsp70 human promoter already described
in the literature [5,7]. The Hsp70 promoter driving the luciferase expression has low basal
activity and can attain high heat-induced activity, up to 53 fold compared to basal activity
(Figure 7.3). Similar results of high heat-induced expression levels coupled with low levels of
basal expression were reported in other studies [3,21]. Furthermore, it was shown that the
magnitude of luciferase activity can be modulated by temperature and duration of
hyperthermia. At temperatures higher than 42° C the promoter activity has the tendency to be
dose-dependent. However, at prolonged exposure at 44° C (for 32 minutes) and 45° C (for 16
and 32 minutes) luciferase activity decreased. This may be due to the increased cell death at
prolonged exposure at 44° C and 45° C, which was also observed in cell viability assays
performed (see Figure 7.1). An alternative explanation for the decreased light emission may
be the denaturation by heat of proteins and organelles such as ribosomes and other
68
intracellular structures, necessary for the production of the luciferase protein. Also the
malfunction of mitochondria causing a lack of ATP and impairing the cell to carry out the
light producing reaction may cause reduced light emission levels.
The induction of the luciferase gene is transient, as shown in Figure 7.2, with maximal
expression levels 3-5 hours after heat shock. Previous studies of other groups reported similar
post-heating times for maximal luciferase activity [22,23]. An analysis of luciferase activity
later than 7 hours after heat shock was not performed, because the results would be biased by
significant cell death due to unfavorable survival conditions of the cells in the PCR tubes.
Therefore, it is unknown when the induced activity returns to basal levels. However, other
studies found comparable times for maximal expression, e.g. 4-8 hours, and reported a return
to background level after 48 hours [8]. The observed transient induction of luciferase is
consistent with the current model of Hsp protein production in response to stress and
discussed in Chapter 6. The endogenous Hsp proteins having repaired the denatured proteins
and being present in unbound form is causing a down regulation of Hsp protein production.
The magnitude and duration of heat-induced luciferase activity is comparable for the three
hyperthermia protocols. 16 minutes at 43° C, 8 minutes at 44° C and 4 minutes at 45° C result
all three in the same thermal iso-effect dose (TID) assuming that the K-factor in the Arrhenius
relationship equals 2, as was suggested by Sapareto et al. [13]. Several studies showed that
magnitude and duration of heat-induced luciferase activity is proportional to that of the
inducing stress (i.e. thermal dose), explaining the observed results [24,25].
In its classical approach the Arrhenius relationship predicts that the tissue damage (i.e. protein
denaturation) is linearly proportional to the time of exposure at a given constant temperature
and exponentially proportional to the temperature at a given time of exposure. In this study
we showed that Hsp70 promoter activation also follows the Arrhenius relationship over the
temperature range of 42 to 45° C. We found, using two different analysis methods, that the
activation energy values are comparable with respective values of 630,000 J·mol-1 and
647,577 J·mol-1. These activation energy values correspond with K factors of 2.11 and 2.16
respectively. Thus, for obtaining similar expression levels of therapeutic transgene at various
temperatures, a decrease of 1° C requires 2.1 fold increase in hyperthermic exposure time.
Different values for the activation energy were found by Beckham et al. (1.74·106 J·mol-1)
[12], Rylander et al. (2.4·105 J·mol-1) [26] and Diaz et al. (4.5·105 J·mol-1) [27]. This variation
may be explained by different biological endpoints chosen as ‘damage’ indicator. This study
69
and Beckham et al. used Hsp70 promoter activity, reflected by light emission, as arbitrary
endpoint. In contrast, Rylander et al. and Diaz et al. used cell viability as arbitrary endpoint.
Furthermore, all four studies used different cell lines for their research.
The activation energy found in our study is very similar to the activation energy for thermal
denaturation of proteins, which is in the range of 586,000 J·mol-1 [18,19]. Therefore, we
hypothesize that protein denaturation is the underlying phenomenon for the activation of the
Hsp70 promoter as well as tissue damage. Upon a certain threshold of thermal stress Hsps are
produced to protect the tissue from thermal damage. Crossing this thermal stress threshold
results in tissue damage and Hsps become a predictor of tissue damage. Hsp production is a
precursor of tissue damage (depending on the level of stress) and therefore both (Hsp
production and tissue damage) have the same mechanism at their origin (i.e. protein
denaturation), which results in similar activation energies.
Concrete examples of therapy related applications of the Arrhenius analysis are demonstrated
with the help of the iso-activation plot in Figure 7.5. The iso-activation plot can be used to
compare the results of treatments performed with different temperatures and/or durations, but
also for treatment planning. An important observation for the planning phase is that it is
preferable to change exposure times instead of temperature for changing from one iso-level to
another, particularly at exposure times shorter than 300 seconds. This can be explained by the
distance between two iso-levels in temperature, which is higher at longer exposure times, in
combination with the fact that control of temperature is more difficult and less precise than
the control of exposure time, certainly in vivo.
7.5. Conclusions
In this study the Hsp70 mouse promoter activity was assessed with respect to temperature and
duration of hyperthermia in homogeneous bone marrow cell suspensions from NLF-1 mice,
containing the firefly luciferase gene under control of this heat sensitive promoter. It was
shown that the Hsp70 promoter has a low basal activity and a high heat induced activity.
After induction, luciferase activity is transient with a maximal level of expression 3-5 hours
after induction. We demonstrated that the level of transgene expression can be modulated by
changing the duration or temperature of heating. Furthermore, we found that the Hsp70
promoter activity follows an Arrhenius relationship. The modulatable and predictable nature
of the Hsp70 promoter activity makes it very suitable for controlling gene expression.
70
7.6. Reference
[1] Isomoto H, Ohtsuru A, Braiden V, Iwamatsu M, Miki F, Kawashita Y, Mizuta Y,
Kaneda Y, Kohno S, Yamashita S. Heat-directed suicide gene therapy mediated by
heat shock protein promoter for gastric cancer. Oncol Rep 2006;15(3):629-635.
[2] Brade AM, Szmitko P, Ngo D, Liu FF, Klamut HJ. Heat-directed suicide gene therapy
for breast cancer. Cancer Gene Ther 2003;10(4):294-301.
[3] Braiden V, Ohtsuru A, Kawashita Y, Miki F, Sawada T, Ito M, Cao Y, Kaneda Y,
Koji T, Yamashita S. Eradication of breast cancer xenografts by hyperthermic suicide
gene therapy under the control of the heat shock protein promoter. Hum Gene Ther
2000;11(18):2453-2463.
[4] Tate S, Elborn S. Progress towards gene therapy for cystic fibrosis. Expert Opin Drug
Deliv 2005;2(2):269-280.
[5] Gerner EW, Hersh EM, Pennington M, Tsang TC, Harris D, Vasanwala F, Brailey J.
Heat-inducible vectors for use in gene therapy. Int J Hyperthermia 2000;16(2):171-
181.
[6] Huang Q, Hu JK, Lohr F, Zhang L, Braun R, Lanzen J, Little JB, Dewhirst MW, Li
CY. Heat-induced gene expression as a novel targeted cancer gene therapy strategy.
Cancer Res 2000;60(13):3435-3439.
[7] Borrelli MJ, Schoenherr DM, Wong A, Bernock LJ, Corry PM. Heat-activated
transgene expression from adenovirus vectors infected into human prostate cancer
cells. Cancer Res 2001;61(3):1113-1121.
[8] Smith RC, Machluf M, Bromley P, Atala A, Walsh K. Spatial and temporal control of
transgene expression through ultrasound-mediated induction of the heat shock protein
70B promoter in vivo. Hum Gene Ther 2002;13(6):697-706.
[9] Xu L, Zhao Y, Zhang Q, Li Y, Xu Y. Regulation of transgene expression in muscles
by ultrasound-mediated hyperthermia. Gene Ther 2004;11(11):894-900.
[10] Silcox CE, Smith RC, King R, McDannold N, Bromley P, Walsh K, Hynynen K.
MRI-guided ultrasonic heating allows spatial control of exogenous luciferase in canine
prostate. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005;31(7):965-970.
[11] Plathow C, Lohr F, Divkovic G, Rademaker G, Farhan N, Peschke P, Zuna I, Debus J,
Claussen CD, Kauczor HU, Li CY, Jenne J, Huber P. Focal gene induction in the liver
of rats by a heat-inducible promoter using focused ultrasound hyperthermia:
preliminary results. Invest Radiol 2005;40(11):729-735.
71
[12] Beckham JT, Mackanos MA, Crooke C, Takahashi T, O'Connell-Rodwell C, Contag
CH, Jansen ED. Assessment of cellular response to thermal laser injury through
bioluminescence imaging of heat shock protein 70. Photochem Photobiol
2004;79(1):76-85.
[13] Sapareto SA, Dewey WC. Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy. Int J Radiat
Oncol Biol Phys 1984;10(6):787-800.
[14] Henriques FC. Studies of thermal injury V. The predictability and the significance of
thermally induced rate processes leading to irreversible epidermal injury. Archives of
Pathology 1947;43:489-502.
[15] Roizin-Towle L, Pirro JP. The response of human and rodent cells to hyperthermia. Int
J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991;20(4):751-756.
[16] Westra A, Dewey WC. Variation in sensitivity to heat shock during the cell-cycle of
Chinese hamster cells in vitro. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med
1971;19(5):467-477.
[17] Borrelli MJ, Thompson LL, Cain CA, Dewey WC. Time-temperature analysis of cell
killing of BHK cells heated at temperatures in the range of 43.5 degrees C to 57.0
degrees C. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990;19(2):389-399.
[18] Dewey WC, Freeman ML, Raaphorst GP, Clark EP, Wong RSL, Highfield DP, Spiro
IJ, Tomasovic SP, Denman DL, Coss RA. Cell Biology of hyperthermia and radiation.
Withers RMaHR, editor. New York: Raven Press; 1980. 589–621 p.
[19] Dewey WC, Hopwood LE, Sapareto SA, Gerweck LE. Cellular responses to
combinations of hyperthermia and radiation. Radiology 1977;123(2):463-474.
[20] Dewhirst MW. Thermal dosimetry. Seegenschmiedt MH, Bolomey J-C, Fessenden P,
Vernon CC, Brady LW, Heilmann H-P, editors. Berlin: Springer; 1995. 123-136 p.
[21] Brade AM, Ngo D, Szmitko P, Li PX, Liu FF, Klamut HJ. Heat-directed gene
targeting of adenoviral vectors to tumor cells. Cancer Gene Ther 2000;7(12):1566-
1574.
[22] Arai Y, Kubo T, Kobayashi K, Ikeda T, Takahashi K, Takigawa M, Imanishi J,
Hirasawa Y. Control of delivered gene expression in chondrocytes using heat shock
protein 70B promoter. J Rheumatol 1999;26(8):1769-1774.
[23] Blackburn RV, Galoforo SS, Corry PM, Lee YJ. Adenoviral-mediated transfer of a
heat-inducible double suicide gene into prostate carcinoma cells. Cancer Res
1998;58(7):1358-1362.
72
[24] Landry J, Bernier D, Chretien P, Nicole LM, Tanguay RM, Marceau N. Synthesis and
degradation of heat shock proteins during development and decay of thermotolerance.
Cancer Res 1982;42(6):2457-2461.
[25] Li GC, Werb Z. Correlation between synthesis of heat shock proteins and
development of thermotolerance in Chinese hamster fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U
S A 1982;79(10):3218-3222.
[26] Rylander MN, Diller KR, Wang S, Aggarwal SJ. Correlation of HSP70 expression and
cell viability following thermal stimulation of bovine aortic endothelial cells. J
Biomech Eng 2005;127(5):751-757.
[27] Diaz SH, Nelson JS, Wong BJ. Rate process analysis of thermal damage in cartilage.
Phys Med Biol 2003;48(1):19-29.
73
Chapter 8. In vivo characterization of the Hsp70
promoter
8.1. Introduction
In Chapter 7 the influence of different heat shock protocols on Hsp70 promoter activity was
investigated in vitro. It was concluded that the promoter activity was transient and could be
modulated by changing temperature and/or duration of the heat shock. It was also
demonstrated that in the range between 42 and 45° C the promoter activity followed an
Arrhenius relationship, making comparison between heating protocols with different time-
temperature history possible. Furthermore, it was shown that for iso-effect at various
temperatures, a decrease of 1° C requires the hyperthermic exposure to be increased with a
factor of about 2.
In this chapter a transgenic mouse model is used to assess the kinetics of the Hsp70 promoter
activity with respect to temperature and duration of hyperthermia in vivo. The in vivo mouse
model gives also the possibility to investigate the time course of the promoter activity after
multiple sequential heatings. This is a situation that may resemble to a clinical situation,
where multiple sequential heatings might be necessary, due to the transient character of the
promoter, in order to obtain a prolonged treatment. Therefore, we investigated the effects of a
second and third heat shock at different time points after the first heat shock. In this case a
phenomenon called acquired thermotolerance may play an important role in manipulating the
magnitude of transgene activity.
Acquired thermotolerance is defined as the ability of a cell or organism to become resistant to
heat stress after a prior sub-lethal heat exposure [1-3]. The phenomenon of acquired
thermotolerance is transient in nature and depends primarily on the severity of the initial heat
stress. In general, the greater the initial heat dose, the greater the magnitude and duration of
thermotolerance. Although, there are several observations that suggest that Hsps are directly
involved in thermotolerance [4-6], the precise mechanism is not well understood. For
example, there are studies that found a correlation between the kinetics of thermotolerance
induction and decay versus changes in Hsp induction and degradation, but no causal
relationship has been established [7,8]. It is also not the objective of this study to enlighten the
phenomenon of thermotolerance: we are only interested in the behavior of transgene
74
expression after multiple activations. However we are aware that thermotolerance can result
in ‘unexpected’ expression levels.
8.2. Material & methods
Animals
In a first preliminary study female (n = 9) homozygote transgenic mice (NLF-1) in the age of
23-25 weeks were used [9]. In the succeeding studies only male (n = 54) NLF-1 mice in the
age of 15-22 weeks were used, to exclude variations due to hormonal period. One week
before being included in the protocol, each individual mouse was tested regarding to their
phenotype. Bioluminescence images (BLI) were acquired to verify the presence of low light
emission at the position of the feet and tail after luciferin injection. In contrast to testing
method used in Chapter 9, the mice were not heated: only the basal luciferase activity was
measured. One day before performing the heating experiments the posterior part of the mouse
was shaved with a clipper and depilatory cream. The absence of animal hair assured optimal
contact between the water and the skin during heating and less absorption and scattering of
light during bioluminescence imaging.
Heating
Heating was done in a water bath with automatic temperature regulation, preventing
fluctuations in temperature during the experiment. Water temperature was measured with a
calibrated thermometer (Luxtron, California, USA). Before and during heating, the animals
were sedated with isoflurane (2 % in air). For applying the heat shock, their left leg was put in
the water while the rest of their body was lying on isolation material to prevent overheating of
the mouse.
For the preliminary study 9 female mice were heated in groups of 3 at 43° C for duration of 4,
8 and 16 minutes, respectively. The same heating protocol was repeated on the same mice one
week later.
To investigate more extensively the influence of temperature and duration of hyperthermia on
the luciferase activity, 48 male mice were heated, in groups of 4, at different constant
temperatures (43, 44, 45 and 46° C) for three different exposure times (ranging between 30
seconds and 32 minutes, depending on the chosen temperature). This resulted in 12 different
combinations of temperature and exposure time. The same heating protocol was repeated on
the same mice one and two weeks later for three different heating protocols.
75
Control studies were performed on 6 mice. In a first series of experiments mice (n = 3) were
heated 16 minutes at 36.5° C during 3 weeks with 1-week interval. In a second series of
experiments mice (n = 3) were heated a first time 8 minutes at 36.5° C. The second and third
heating were performed at 43° C (8 minutes) 1 and 2 weeks after the first heating,
respectively.
All heatings were performed on the left hind leg of the mice and were followed by kinetic
measurement of luciferase activity with BLI as described below.
Bioluminescence image acquisition and analysis
To establish the time course of luciferase activity after applying different heating protocols,
bioluminescence imaging (BLI) was continued at two hours intervals for 10 hours.
Bioluminescence images of mice were acquired using a NightOWL LB 981 system equipped
with a NC 100 CCD camera (Berthold Technologies, Germany). Mice were injected intra-
peritoneally with D-luciferin (Promega, 2.9 mg in 100µL sterile phosphate buffer). Two
minutes later, mice were sedated with isoflurane (2 % in air) and bioluminescence images (2
minutes integration period, 2×2 binning) were taken 7 and 10 minutes after the luciferin
injection in prone and supine positions, respectively. A low light imaging standard (Glowell,
LUX biotechnology, UK) was placed next to the animal during each image acquisition to
provide a constant reference for the resulting images.
Analysis of the BLI was done manually by placing a small region of interest (ROI) at the
level of the knee of the heated leg, see Figure 8.1. This region was chosen because it does not
suffer from hyper-intense light spots due to small skin wounds. Within this ROI, the mean
light intensity (in photons s-1 mm-2) was measured.
Arrhenius An Arrhenius analysis was performed to assess the in vivo promoter activity with respect to
different temperatures (43, 44, 45 and 46° C) and different durations (varying between 30
seconds and 16 minutes) of hyperthermia. The light emission values were measured at
different time points (2, 4, 6 and 8 hours) after heating. As described in Chapter 7 a least
square fit was performed between the experimental and theoretical values to obtain the
activation energy (Ea) and frequency factor (A) that describe best the relationship between
different heating protocols. For a detailed description of the performed least square fit the
reader is referred to section 7.1. Also the second method, based on the linearization of
76
Arrhenius equation, was performed to calculate the activation energy and frequency rate. For
both analyses the data of all 12 different heating protocols were used.
8.3. Results
Figure 8.1 shows an example of a bioluminescence image taken four hours after heating the
left leg of a mouse in a water bath. There is only significant light coming from the heated leg.
The position of the ROI, used for quantification of the bioluminescence signal, is also
indicated. When the same ROI is placed on the knee of the non-heated leg it gives the basal
level of light emission, which is around 8000 photons s-1 mm-2.
Figure 8.1 Bioluminescence image taken 4 hours after heating the left leg of NLF-1 mouse in
a water bath. The colors show the light intensity measured with an optical camera in the
range of 200 photons per second (dark blue) to 4000 photons per second (red). The position
of the ROI used for quantification of the bioluminescence signal is also indicated.
Figure 8.2 shows the in vivo time course of luciferase activity after applying a heat shock at
different temperatures (43° C (a), 44° C (b), 45° C (c) and 46° C (d)) and for different
exposure times. The exposure times were changed according to the temperature to prevent
77
tissue damage: the higher the temperature, the shorter the exposure time. The luciferase
activity is transient for each combination of temperature and exposure time and the maximal
light emission was always found 4 hours after heating. For all temperatures tested, an increase
in luciferase activity of about 2 folds is observed when the exposure time is double at each
constant temperature.
Figure 8.2 Kinetic study of luciferase activity during 10 hours after heating a mouse leg with
different heating protocols. (a) 4, 8 and 16 minutes at 43° C, (b) 2, 4 and 8 minutes at 44° C,
(c) 1, 2 and 4 minutes at 45° C and (d) 30 seconds, 1 and 2 minutes at 46° C.
To demonstrate the influence of 1° C temperature increase at constant time of exposure the
data in Figure 8.2 are re-arranged and shown in Figure 8.3. Here the time courses of luciferase
activity after 4 minutes heating at 43, 44 and 45° C are plotted. An increase of 1° C results is
an increase of luciferase activity of about 2. This increase in activity was similar to the
increase of activity after doubling the time of heat exposure, as we saw in Figure 8.2.
78
0,0E+00
2,0E+05
4,0E+05
6,0E+05
8,0E+05
2 4 6 8 10
time after heating (h)
SI (
ph/s
/mm
2)
43° C
44° C
45° C
Figure 8.3 Kinetic study of luciferase activity during 10 hours after heating. For heating the
mouse leg was put 4 minutes in a water bath with a temperature of 43, 44 and 45° C,
respectively.
The measurements of luciferase activity at several time points after heating for different
temperatures and durations of hyperthermia were used for Arrhenius analysis in time. In
Figure 8.4 the logarithm of the luciferase activity 6 hours after heating is plotted as function
of the inverse absolute temperature. The data point corresponding to 46° C has a large
standard deviation and does not coincide with the linear tendency observed for the other three
data points. This may be explained by the short periods of heating (30 seconds, 1 and 2
minutes) at 46° C. These short heating periods may not be sufficient to obtain a homogenous
distribution of the elevated temperature in the leg, which causes a larger uncertainty in the
measured values. Therefore the data points measured at 46° C were not used for the Arrhenius
analysis. The solid line is a linear fit with error weighting performed on three data points,
corresponding to 43, 44 and 45° C. The correlation coefficient of the linear fit equaled 0.9441
indicating that experimental values followed an Arrhenius relationship.The activation energy
(Ea) was determined from the slope of the linear fit and the K-factor is calculated with help of
equation 7-5. The activation energy and K-factor were also calculated by performing a least
square fit between experimental data (without the data corresponding to 46° C) and
79
theoretical data . Figure 8.5 shows the evolution in time of the K-factor for the two different
analysis methods. The mean K-factor equals 1.9 ± 8% for both methods.
Figure 8.4 ‘Classical’ Arrhenius plot for constant-temperature in vivo water bath experiments
6h after heating. The error bars represent the standard deviation of the averages for each
temperature. The solid line is a linear fit with error weighting performed on three data points,
corresponding to 43, 44 and 45° C.
To simulate a clinical protocol where multiple sequential heatings are required for obtaining a
prolonged therapy, multiple similar heatings were performed at a week interval. In a
preliminary study the effect of two repeated heatings was measured for 3 different heating
protocols at the same temperature but with different thermal dose (i.e. 4, 8 and 16 minutes at
43° C). The time course of luciferase activity was measured during 10 hours after the first and
second heating for each protocol (Figure 8.6). The maximal luciferase activity was found 4
hours after heating, independent of the heating protocol and the number of heatings performed
before. However, the light intensity was consistently higher after the second heating,
independent of the heating protocol. The mean increase in signal intensity during 10 hours
was 2.1, 2.6 and 4.1 for 4, 8 and 16 minutes, respectively. The increase in luciferase activity
80
after the second heating appears to be larger when increasing the thermal dose of the heating
protocol.
0,00
0,50
1,00
1,50
2,00
2,50
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
time after heating (h)
K-f
act
or
Least square fit
'classic method'
Figure 8.5 Time course of K-factor for different methods of analysis. The K-factor was
calculated with help of a least square fit using either all data points or only the data points
corresponding to 43, 44 and 45° C. The K-factor was also calculated for both data sets with
linear fit method as demonstrated in figure 4.
Next, the effect of heating three times with an interval of one week was investigated for 3
different heating protocols with equivalent thermal dose (assuming a K-factor of 2) but
different temperature (i.e. 8 minutes at 43° C, 4 minutes at 44° C and 2 minutes at 45° C,
figure 5). The time course of luciferase activity was followed during 10 hours after each
heating and is shown in Figure 8.7. As observed before, the maximal luciferase activity was
found 4 hours after heating, independent of the number of heatings already performed before.
A mean increase of 4.8, 3.3 and 2.3 was found after the second heating for 8 minutes at 43° C,
4 minutes at 44° C and 2 minutes at 45° C, respectively. Apparently there is a smaller increase
in luciferase activity after the second heating at higher temperatures, but equal thermal dose.
In contrast, after the third heating a significant decrease in luciferase activity is observed
81
compared to the second heating. The luciferase activity returns to the same level as after the
first heating.
In the first series of control experiments no change in promoter activity was observed after
multiple heatings at 36,5° C during 16 minutes. The mean light emission levels 4 hours after
heating were 7709, 9521 and 6646 photons·s-1·mm-2 after the first, second and third heating,
respectively. These emission levels are similar to the emission levels of the non-heated leg
(6691 photons·s-1·mm-2).
In the second series of control experiments no increase in light emission was observed in the
heated leg (8 minutes at 36.5° C) compared to the unheated leg. After a second heating,
performed during 8 minutes at 43° C, similar levels of light emission were reached as was
observed for the first heating of 8 minutes at 43° C in Figure 8.2. After a third heating, also
performed during 8 minutes at 43° C, an increase in light emission was observed compared to
the emission levels after the second heating. This observation corresponds with the increase in
light intensity after the second heating shown in Figure 8.7.
82
Figure 8.6 Time course of luciferase activity after a first and a second similar heating in the
same animal for 4 (a), 8 (b) or 16 minutes (c) at 43° C.
83
Figure 8.7 Time course of luciferase activity after a first, second and third similar heating in
the same animal. Three different heating protocols were investigated: (a) 8 minutes at 43° C,
(b) 4 minutes at 44° C and (c) 2 minutes at 45° C.
84
8.4. Discussion
There are already a substantial amount of studies that demonstrate that modulation of Hsp70
promoter activity is possible in vitro by changing temperature and duration of hyperthermia
[10,11]. However, an extensive study of in vivo modulation of Hsp70 promoter activity has
not yet been performed. Silcox et al. showed that the canine prostate that received the longest
hyperthermic treatment above 42° C also expressed the highest level of luciferase activity
[12]. However, the prostates were genetically modified using a virus to express luciferase
under control of Hsp70 promoter and the measurement of promoter activity was invasive.
Therefore, a heterogeneous distribution of the reporter gene may be expected and a kinetic
analysis of promoter activity in the same animal is impossible. In this study the in vivo
characterization of Hsp70 promoter was performed with a transgenic mouse model,
expressing the luciferase gene under control of Hsp70 promoter, and water bath heating. The
transgenic mouse model excludes variations in luciferase expression due to heterogeneous
gene delivery and allows multiple sequential measurements of luciferase activity in the same
mouse.
The light emission originating from the non-heated leg of the NLF-1 mouse is very low (8000
photons s-1 mm-2), implying a low basal activity of the Hsp70 promoter. After heating, the
luciferase activity can increase up to 75-fold compared to the basal activity. This increase in
luciferase activity is comparable with the result from the in vitro study (Chapter 7).
Furthermore, it was shown that the magnitude of luciferase activity can be modulated by
changing the temperature and duration of hyperthermia. An about 2-fold increase of luciferase
activity is observed after doubling heating duration at constant temperature and after
increasing temperature with 1° C at constant time of exposure. This factor 2 increase in
luciferase activity was confirmed by performing an Arrhenius analysis. Two different analysis
methods resulted in a K-factor of 1.9, which is comparable with the value found in the in vitro
study (i.e. 2.1). Notice that the Arrhenius analysis is based on the light emission measured
after different heating protocols. The level of light emission depends on the production (i.e.
promoter activity) and elimination of the luciferase protein. The transient character of the
light emission levels show that the relative contribution of both process change in time.
However, the K-factor remains almost constant in time.
After repetition of the same heating protocol at 1-week interval, considerably different
luciferase activity levels were observed. The second heating led to a significant increase
compared to the first heating, whereas after the third heating the luciferase activity returned to
85
a level comparable to that of the first heating. In addition, the increase in luciferase activity
after a second heating appeared to be thermal dose and temperature dependent. To the
author’s knowledge this is the first study that showed an increased luciferase activity after a
second heating. Further research is needed to verify that this phenomenon is not related to our
transgenic mouse model and to analyze the consequences for gene therapy. With the current
knowledge of the behavior of Hsp70 and its role in thermotolerance these observations are
difficult to explain. Studies with different transgenic models showed that Hsp has a protective
function when it is present at elevated concentrations. For example, it was shown that
transgenic mice with an elevated constitutive Hsp70 expression had a higher resistance to
cardiac ischemia [13,14]. Similar observations were made when knock out animals were used
to study the influence of different genes on the heat shock response [15,16]. In contrast, the
animals in our study did not show any luciferase activity just before the second and third
heating, indicating that the Hsp70 promoter activity had returned to basal level. Furthermore,
in literature it was shown that the life time of endogenous Hsp after heat shock is at maximum
3-5 days [7,17]. Therefore, it is very unlikely that the increased luciferase activity observed
after the second heating is due to the increased presence of endogenous Hsp that is produced
after the first heating. Future research should investigate whether the increased luciferase
activity is really due to increased promoter activity or due to a change in the reaction of
luciferine to oxy-luciferin, by looking at the mRNA levels of luciferase and endogenous Hsp
after the first and second heating. Theodorakis et al. suggested that thermotolerant cells,
containing large concentrations of Hsps, limit Hsp70 expression by transcriptional and
pretranslational mechanisms, perhaps to avoid the potential cytotoxic effect of these proteins
[18]. This mechanism could explain the lower luciferase activity observed after the third
heating in our study. Assuming that the increased luciferase activity after the second heating
is due to an increased promoter activity a high concentration of Hsps may be expected. The
complete degradation of this large amount of Hsps may exceed the 3-5 days as mentioned
before and therefore result in an increased level of Hsps after 1 week. In future work this
theory should be verified by measurements of endogenous Hsp levels.
8.5. Conclusion
In this study it was shown that the activity of Hsp70 promoter can be modulated in vivo by
changing temperature and/or duration of hyperthermia. Hsp70 promoter activity follows an
Arrhenius relationship making temperature-time normalization of different heating protocols
possible. Temperature-time normalization allows comparison of achievable therapeutic levels
86
after different heating protocols and could be used during treatment planning. When multiple
sequential heatings are necessary for obtaining the desired therapeutic effect, treatment
planning may become more complicated. The until now unexplained increased luciferase
activity after a second heating compared to the first heating makes estimation of final
therapeutic effect after multiple heatings difficult.
8.6. References
[1] Landry J, Chretien P. Relationship between hyperthermia-induced heat-shock proteins
and thermotolerance in Morris hepatoma cells. Can J Biochem Cell Biol
1983;61(6):428-437.
[2] Li GC, Werb Z. Correlation between synthesis of heat shock proteins and
development of thermotolerance in Chinese hamster fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U
S A 1982;79(10):3218-3222.
[3] Mizzen LA, Welch WJ. Characterization of the thermotolerant cell. I. Effects on
protein synthesis activity and the regulation of heat-shock protein 70 expression. J
Cell Biol 1988;106(4):1105-1116.
[4] Feder ME, Cartano NV, Milos L, Krebs RA, Lindquist SL. Effect of engineering
Hsp70 copy number on Hsp70 expression and tolerance of ecologically relevant heat
shock in larvae and pupae of Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Biol 1996;199(Pt
8):1837-1844.
[5] Johnston RN, Kucey BL. Competitive inhibition of hsp70 gene expression causes
thermosensitivity. Science 1988;242(4885):1551-1554.
[6] Riabowol KT, Mizzen LA, Welch WJ. Heat shock is lethal to fibroblasts
microinjected with antibodies against hsp70. Science 1988;242(4877):433-436.
[7] Landry J, Bernier D, Chretien P, Nicole LM, Tanguay RM, Marceau N. Synthesis and
degradation of heat shock proteins during development and decay of thermotolerance.
Cancer Res 1982;42(6):2457-2461.
[8] Li GC. Elevated levels of 70,000 dalton heat shock protein in transiently
thermotolerant Chinese hamster fibroblasts and in their stable heat resistant variants.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1985;11(1):165-177.
[9] Christians E, Campion E, Thompson EM, Renard JP. Expression of the HSP 70.1
gene, a landmark of early zygotic activity in the mouse embryo, is restricted to the
first burst of transcription. Development 1995;121(1):113-122.
87
[10] Borrelli MJ, Schoenherr DM, Wong A, Bernock LJ, Corry PM. Heat-activated
transgene expression from adenovirus vectors infected into human prostate cancer
cells. Cancer Res 2001;61(3):1113-1121.
[11] Smith RC, Machluf M, Bromley P, Atala A, Walsh K. Spatial and temporal control of
transgene expression through ultrasound-mediated induction of the heat shock protein
70B promoter in vivo. Hum Gene Ther 2002;13(6):697-706.
[12] Silcox CE, Smith RC, King R, McDannold N, Bromley P, Walsh K, Hynynen K.
MRI-guided ultrasonic heating allows spatial control of exogenous luciferase in canine
prostate. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005;31(7):965-970.
[13] Marber MS, Mestril R, Chi SH, Sayen MR, Yellon DM, Dillmann WH.
Overexpression of the rat inducible 70-kD heat stress protein in a transgenic mouse
increases the resistance of the heart to ischemic injury. J Clin Invest 1995;95(4):1446-
1456.
[14] Plumier JC, Ross BM, Currie RW, Angelidis CE, Kazlaris H, Kollias G, Pagoulatos
GN. Transgenic mice expressing the human heat shock protein 70 have improved
post-ischemic myocardial recovery. J Clin Invest 1995;95(4):1854-1860.
[15] Huang L, Mivechi NF, Moskophidis D. Insights into regulation and function of the
major stress-induced hsp70 molecular chaperone in vivo: analysis of mice with
targeted gene disruption of the hsp70.1 or hsp70.3 gene. Mol Cell Biol
2001;21(24):8575-8591.
[16] Xia W, Vilaboa N, Martin JL, Mestril R, Guo Y, Voellmy R. Modulation of tolerance
by mutant heat shock transcription factors. Cell Stress Chaperones 1999;4(1):8-18.
[17] Kregel KC. Heat shock proteins: modifying factors in physiological stress responses
and acquired thermotolerance. J Appl Physiol 2002;92(5):2177-2186.
[18] Theodorakis NG, Drujan D, De Maio A. Thermotolerant cells show an attenuated
expression of Hsp70 after heat shock. J Biol Chem 1999;274(17):12081-12086.
89
Chapter 9. Local gene activation using MR guided
HIFU
9.1. Introduction
The objective of gene therapy is to express a therapeutic gene in the region where therapy is
required (i.e. spatial control) and for the duration necessary (i.e. temporal control) to achieve a
therapeutic effect while minimizing systemic toxicity. Several approaches for controlling
gene expression have been presented in Chapter 5. The use of heat in combination with heat-
inducible promoters, such as the Heat Shock Protein (Hsp) promoters, for local activation of
gene expression is a versatile method and has already been successfully employed [1]. In vitro
experiments showed that the human Hsp70 promoter [2,3] as well as the murine Hsp70
promoter (Chapter 7) are suitable for controlling gene activation. Both promoters showed low
basal activity and high heat-induced expression amplification. In addition, their magnitude of
induction depends on temperature as well as on the duration of the induced hyperthermia
[4,5]. Similar promoter characteristics were reported in vivo in a number of organs, such as
skin [5], muscle [6], prostate [7] and liver [8] that were genetically modified using either a
virus or plasmid to express a reporter gene under the control of the Hsp70 promoter. Non-
invasive in vivo local heating, and thus local activation of gene expression, could be achieved
with High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) [8-10], but a subtle compromise has to be
found in the heating strategy since excessive tissue heating can induce tissue damage and
necrosis [11]. Local temperature distribution can be monitored with Magnetic Resonance
temperature Imaging (MRI) to evaluate efficacy of heat-induced gene activation technique as
well as safety. Furthermore, recent developments in MRI guided HIFU techniques allow
automatic control of the HIFU energy deposition in order that the local tissue temperature at
the targeted location follows a predefined temperature evolution [12,13]. This fully automated
approach has been developed and tested in vivo for tumor models expressing a fluorescent
protein reporter gene under transcriptional control of Hsp70B promoter [9]. Unfortunately,
due to limitations of currently available fluorescence imaging capabilities in deep tissues, the
kinetics of gene expression is difficult to assess in vivo. In addition, tumor models show a
high variability in the level of gene expression due to the spatial heterogeneity of cancerous
tissue and physiology. As a consequence, a quantitative spatio-temporal correlation between
MR temperature maps and transgene expression as well as an assessment of promoter activity
90
with respect to the temperature and duration of hyperthermia could not be established.
Moreover, the presence of necrosis complicated the evaluation of the non-invasiveness of the
method.
To overcome these limitations, in the present work a healthy transgenic mouse strain was
chosen to compare spatio-temporal control of gene expression with different heating patterns
under reproducible conditions. This animal model, expressing the firefly luciferase reporter
gene under control of a Hsp promoter, allowed in vivo assessment of the spatial extent and
time course of gene expression via bioluminescence imaging. In addition, the potential
influence of the mechanical and thermal stress of HIFU on Hsp promoter activation was
compared. Finally, a systematic evaluation of the damage induced by HIFU hyperthermia in
the targeted tissue was performed to evaluate the safety of this gene activation strategy.
9.2. Material & methods
Animals
Male homozygote transgenic mice (NLF-1) in the age of 17-26 weeks were used in this study
[14]. NLF-1 mice contain a transgene that allows firefly luciferase expression under control of
the mouse heat shock protein 70 promoter (Hspa1b). Each individual mouse was tested with
regard to their phenotype by heating both front legs in a water bath at constant temperature
(43°C) during 5 minutes three weeks prior to the start of the protocol. Bioluminescence
images (BLI) were acquired to verify the presence of light emission in the heated area (see
below for details of the BLI protocol). The posterior part of the mouse was shaved with a
clipper and depilatory cream to improve ultrasound and light propagation prior to HIFU
studies. All procedures were performed according to protocols approved by the French law
and the rules of animal care of the institute.
HIFU device
Ultrasound experiments were performed with an in-house designed single channel focused
ultrasound transducer (built by Imasonic SA, Besancon, France) incorporated in the bed of the
1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) system. The transducer had a focal length of
80 mm and external radius aperture of 60 mm. The sinusoidal signal (1.5 MHz) was generated
using a Yokogawa FG110 wave generator (Yokogawa, Tokyo, Japan) and amplified using a
Kalmus KMP 170F amplifier (Kalmus, Bothell, WA). The dimensions of the focal point were
91
1 × 1 × 4 mm3 (at -3 dB). The wave generator was remotely controlled via in-house written
software running under Windows.
Animal preparation for MRI guided HIFU heating
Animals were sedated with isoflurane (2% in air) and received muscle relaxants (100 µl
lidocaine (2.5 mg·ml-1) in 3 different positions intra-muscularly) in the left hind leg to prevent
unwanted muscle contraction during sonication. Injection of 200 µl of the local anesthetic
ropivacaine (0.5 mg·ml-1) was performed subcutaneously in 2 different positions and 500 µl
ketamine (1.67 mg·ml-1) intra peritoneal as an analgesic (t = 0). To maintain the animal body
temperature constant at 35° C, the animal was positioned over a heating plate. At t = 10-15
minutes, the animal was positioned prone into the MRI, above the focused ultrasound
transducer immersed in a thermo regulated (35° C) water bath with 0.1% (w/v) manganese. At
t = 30 minutes, the deposition of energy by ultrasound was started.
MRI thermometry during HIFU sonication
Online monitoring of temperature distribution was performed with MRI thermometry, using
the proton resonance frequency technique [15]. Dynamic MR temperature imaging was
performed on Philips Achieva 1.5 Tesla with a segmented EPI sequence (EPI-factor = 5, TE =
15 ms, TR = 34 ms, flip angle = 160, FOV = 64 × 56 mm2, matrix = 64 × 64, 3 slices),
resulting in continuous and volumetric acquisition of gradient echo images with a resolution
of 1 × 1 × 2 mm3 every 1.6 seconds. A 23 mm surface receiver coil was positioned above the
mouse hind leg to provide sufficient signal to noise ratio on MRI images. MRI temperature
maps were calculated using the phase information in the gradient echo images and displayed
online. Potential drift of the temperature (caused by drift in time of the phase of the MRI
signal not related to temperature) was compensated by subtracting the average temperature in
a reference Region Of Interest (ROI) selected within the muscle outside the heated area. Short
(~ 10 s), low power HIFU was performed to verify the position of the focal point. The
maximal tissue temperature increase resulting from this test did not exceed 4°C.
Heating protocols
HIFU heating experiments were performed with automatic feedback regulation of the tissue
temperature at the HIFU focal point based on dynamic analysis of the MRI temperature
images to adjust the output power of the HIFU system [16]. Three heating conditions were
investigated, all consisting of a ramp time of 1 minute followed by a plateau at 43°C of either
2, 5 or 8 minutes. The required temperature increase to reach 43° C was determined for each
92
animal based on measurement of the rectal temperature using a MRI compatible thermometer
(Luxtron, California, USA). The electric power was registered for each protocol. The
efficiency of the transducer in water was used to calculate acoustical power levels. The
equivalent amount of energy was then applied to a separate group of animals at constant
power (equal to the mean value found in the initial set of experiments with automatic
feedback) in a pulsed manner (20% duty cycle at 1 Hz, increasing the duration by a factor of
5) to investigate the influence of the mechanical stress induced by HIFU on the resulting gene
activation. These experiments were also performed under MR temperature imaging with
identical imaging parameters, but without automatic MRI-guided feedback controlling the
HIFU power.
Bioluminescence image acquisition and analysis
Bioluminescence images of mice were acquired using a NightOWL LB 981 system equipped
with a NC 100 CCD camera (Berthold Technologies, Germany). Mice were injected intra
peritoneally with D-luciferin (Promega, 2.9 mg in 100 µl sterile phosphate buffer). Two
minutes later, mice were sedated with isoflurane (2% in air) and bioluminescence images (2
minutes integration period, 2 × 2 binning) were taken 7 and 10 minutes after the luciferin
injection in prone and supine positions, respectively. A low light emitting standard (Glowell,
LUX biotechnology, UK) was placed next to the animal during each image acquisition to
provide a constant reference for the resulting images. Grey-scale body-surface reference
images were collected for superposition of BLI images on anatomical maps. Pseudocolor
luminescent images representing the spatial distribution of emitted photons were generated
using IDL programming language (ITT). BLI analysis was done semi-automatically by first
placing a small region of interest (ROI) in the region corresponding with the heated region.
Then, a region growing algorithm was used to extend this ROI automatically to find the
region that corresponded to 320 photons·s-1·mm-2. This threshold was chosen to exclude
signal intensity related to the background and basal activity and was determined by analyzing
the histogram of the number of pixels as function of the signal intensity for 10 heated animals.
The mean light intensity was then evaluated within the resulting ROI.
Histology
Mice were sacrificed 24 hours after heating by cranial dislocation. Muscle samples were
obtained from both muscles (gluteal and rectus femoris) by dissection. The non-heated muscle
samples served as negative control for muscle damage. Samples were fixed in 10% neutral-
93
buffered formalin, followed by paraffin embedding and micron-thick sectioning (3µm). Each
paraffin block, containing the whole muscle sample was totally sliced until exhausted and
each slice analyzed. Then hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) staining was performed for routine
qualitative and quantitative examination of tissue morphology of the entire sample.
Histological examination was done by a confirmed pathologist for skeletal muscle in a
blinded manner, with systematic attention to the following parameters: muscle fiber diameters
(degree and distribution of atrophy), alterations in muscle fibers (centralization of
subsarcolemmal nuclei, changes in contour), cell necrosis, inflammatory infiltrate and size of
damage, if any (measured with microscopic lens).
9.3. Results
Precision of automatic temperature control in vivo in the leg muscle of mouse
Figure 9.1a illustrates the precision of the MRI based temperature control at the HIFU focal
point during 2 minutes heating at 43º C in thigh muscle. The standard deviation of the MRI
measured temperature was 0.61 °C at normal body temperature (observed during repetitive
temperature mapping). The average difference between target profile at the plateau and
experimental data was 0.66 °C during heating demonstrating the precision of the automatic
feedback coupling to ensure the predefined temperature evolution. In this experimental set-up
it was not possible to determine the accurancy of the used method. Figure 9.1b displays a
typical MRI thermal map obtained during automatic temperature control. A color coded
image superimposed on a grey-level magnitude MRI image shows the temperature induced by
HIFU heating. The temperature increase is localized at the HIFU focal point and diffuses out
due to heat conduction.
94
Figure 9.1 Typical time course of the temperature evolution during a heating experiment (a),
with the target temperature (in black) and the measured temperature at the focal point (in
red). MRI temperature map (color coded) superimposed on an anatomical MRI image
(grayscale) of the mouse leg (b).
Comparative analysis of MR temperature mapping and bioluminescence imaging
Figure 9.2a and b show MRI temperature maps (5 minutes after the start of the experiment) of
two mice heated with the same protocol, i.e. 8 minutes heating at 43° C in the focal point.
Figure 9.2c and d show bioluminescence images of the same two mice, taken 6 hours after
heating and following i.p. injection of luciferin. Although both mice underwent the same
heating protocol the resulting temperature distribution in the leg clearly appears different,
whereas the temperature evolution in the focal point was identical. This spatial difference is
also observed in the distribution of emitted photons for both mice (Figure 9.2c and d). These
results demonstrate the close correspondence between spatial distribution of temperature and
expression. Since heat conduction is spatially heterogeneous, the temperature distribution can
be expected to be different from animal to animal despite an identical evolution of the
temperature in the focal point.
95
Figure 9.2 MRI temperature maps of two mice heated with the same protocol, i.e. 8 minutes
heating at 43° C at the focal point (a,b). The colors in image a and b show the local
temperature distribution in the mouse leg in the range of 38° C (blue) to 42° C and higher
(red). Bioluminescence images of the same two mice, taken 6 hours after applying the heating
protocol (c,d). The color in images c and d show the light intensity measured with an optical
CCD camera, in the range of 320 photons per second (purple) to 2000 photons per sec and
more (red).
Nature of gene activation stimulus
HIFU exposure results in thermal and non-thermal mechanical stress to the tissue. From
literature it is known that inducible Hsp70 promoters are predominantly sensitive to
temperature but may also be activated by other stimuli like hypoxia [17], ischemia [18] and
mechanical stress [6]. In order to use MRI thermometry as a reliable method to predict local
transgene activation, gene induction should not be affected by the mechanical part of
ultrasound. To evaluate the influence of mechanical stress, a set of experiments was
performed in a separate group of animals, applying the same amount of total acoustical
energy and the same pressure amplitude, but with varying duty cycle. A 20% HIFU duty
96
cycle and 0.7 W acoustical power (comparable to the mean power found in the heating
experiments) resulted in negligible temperature increase. Figure 9.3 compares
bioluminescence images obtained without HIFU application (a), after MRI-monitored pulsed
HIFU experiment with 20% duty cycle (b) and after MRI-controlled HIFU heating (43°C, 2
min) (c). As expected, local light emission was observed at the spot where the leg of the
animal was heated (c, white arrow). The average acoustical energy deposited for this
experiment was 116 J (n = 4). In contrast, no light was detected at the target location
following pulsed HIFU with 125 J energy deposition (b, white arrow). Low intensity light
emission appeared at random locations (~ 160 photons/s) in all cases, attributed to very low
basal activity of the Hsp70 promoter.
Figure 9.3 Bioluminescence images taken before heating (a), 6 hours after depositing 125 J of
energy with pulsed ultrasound (b) and 6 hours after heating at 43° C for 2 minutes (c). The
arrows indicate the location of HIFU application. The color coding is representing the light
intensity measured with the CCD camera in photons per second.
Kinetics of light intensity after heating in vivo
The results of the in vitro experiments (Chapter 7) suggest that the level of expression of the
transgene is transient and depends on the heating amplitude and duration. Using BLI, the
kinetics of light emission was followed for several heating conditions in the leg muscle.
Figure 9.4 shows the evolution of light intensity for 10 mice heated at 43° C for 2, 5 and 8
minutes, respectively. Light was observed in all cases from 4 hours up to 24 hours post
heating. Light intensity remained nearly constant between 4 and 8 hours, and decreased to
basal levels at 24 hours. Weak emission levels persisted at 24 hours for the 8-minute protocols
and for a single 5-minute experiment. Increasing heating time influenced the level of
expression, with little differences between 2 and 5 minutes heating experiments whereas
97
substantially higher (3 to 4 times) expression was detected for the 8-minute heating protocols.
As expected from in vitro experiments, the heat-induced light production in vivo was found to
be transient and its intensity could be modulated by the heating protocol.
Figure 9.4 Time course of gene expression in vivo upon hyperthermia. The leg muscle of
transgenic mice was heated at 43 ° C for 2 (n = 4), 5 (n = 4) or 8 minutes (n = 2),
respectively. The mean light intensity was reported in photons per second per mm2. Light
emitted by luciferase was measured at 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours after heating. Light emission
below the quantification threshold was marked as ND (not detectable) and measurement not
performed are marked as NA (not available).
Histological analysis of heated muscle
The tissue damage resulting from the different HIFU heating protocols was investigated by
histological analysis and is shown in Figure 9.5. No muscular damage was noticed in muscle
tissue with the pulsed HIFU protocol and following 2 minutes heating at 43° C. However, for
5 minutes protocols at the same temperature a modest variability in fiber diameters without
specific pattern and moderate interstitial edema was noted as well as a few necrotic fibers
with centralized nuclei. Few atrophic fibers and no inflammation were observed. The region
with abnormalities did not exceed 3 millimeters in diameter. When increasing the heating
98
duration to 8 minutes, the muscular damage was more extensive and corresponded to a region
measuring up to 11 millimeters in diameter. In this case a marked variability was observed in
fiber diameters with clearly necrosed fibers and severe interstitial edema, without fascicular or
perifascicular pattern. Necrotic fibers were accompanied by inflammatory infiltrates
(lymphocytes and polynuclear cells).
Figure 9.5 Haematoxylin-Eosin stained histology sections of excised muscle tissue 24 hours
after heating at 43° C for 5 minutes (a and c) and 8 minutes (b and e). After 5 minutes heating
a modest variability in fiber diameters and interstitial edema was observed compared to the
un-heated muscle (d). The muscular damage was more extensive after 8 minutes heating,
including necrotic fibers and inflammatory infiltrates. Image a and b are taken with 2x
magnification, whereas image c, d and e are taken with 10x magnification.
9.4. Discussion
Spatial and temporal control of transgene expression is an important requirement for gene
therapy. In this chapter a high similarity is shown between the local temperature distribution
in vivo and the region emitting light,, using MRI guided HIFU in a transgenic mouse
expressing luciferase under the control of a heat sensitive promoter,. Control of transgene
99
expression was achieved by automatic adjustment of the HIFU power based on continuous
MRI thermometry to force the temperature to follow a predefined temperature evolution. The
good spatial correspondence between increased temperature and gene expression was
demonstrated by comparing MRI temperature maps and bioluminescence images. This
observation is based on qualitative comparison between images of two different imaging
modalities obtained on living animals, and demonstrates the great potential of MRI guided
HIFU to predict and control the region of gene expression. Future research should investigate
the role of iso-temperature levels and thermal dose on the spatial distribution and level of
gene activation. This was not possible with data acquired in this study due to the low SNR of
gradient echo images.
The spatial positioning of the focal point of the focused ultrasound and the quantity of
deposited energy can be completely controlled by the operator. However, the resulting local
temperature distribution and thus the region of gene activation are not completely predictable
and may depend on several parameters such as tissue absorption of ultrasound, and heat
conduction. These parameters can be spatially heterogeneous and may be affected by
temperature increase itself. Thus, the resulting heated area may vary from animal to animal
when using an identical heating protocol as shown in Figure 9.2a and b. However,
temperature maps of each animal clearly correspond with light emitting regions.
From the in vivo results, shown in Figure 9.4, a dose-dependent promoter activity can be
observed, allowing modulation of the gene expression level possible by appropriate choices of
the heating conditions. Furthermore, it was found that the promoter has a low level of basal
expression since light intensity measured in animals not submitted to HIFU heating was very
weak (~ 160 photons/s). In contrast, the level of induced activity increased at least 10-fold,
even with mild activation protocols, i.e. heating for 2 minutes at 43° C (see Figure 9.3c). We
also demonstrated that the influence of mechanical stress of HIFU on gene activation was
negligible, in agreement with the results from Liu et al. [10].
The induction of the luciferase gene was transient with maximal protein activity occurring 6-8
hours after heating. The time course of activation and subsequent de-activation is an intrinsic
property of the promoter, as well as mRNA and protein processing and therefore does not
allow temporal switch-off control by external factors. Since expression returns to near basal
activity at 24 hours following heat-shock, repetitive heating at the same location may allow
for activation during prolonged periods. Alternatively, temporal regulation may be achieved
via the use of two- or three component systems comprising (i) a small molecule dependent
100
transactivator whose expression is placed under the dual control of a Hsp70 promoter and a
transactivator-responsive promoter and (ii) a transactivator-responsive promoter to which a
transgene of interest is linked [19].
The time evolution of luciferase expression upon different activation protocols is comparable
to in vitro observations made by other groups [3,5] and our self (Chapter 7). However,
absolute quantification of the resulting light intensity as a marker of protein activity remains
difficult, since the bioluminescence imaging of the reporter gene used here was a 2-D method
(resulting in weighted projection) whereas multi-slice MRI thermometry was used for
guidance of HIFU. Therefore, light coming from deeper inside the muscle will be attenuated
more than light coming from tissue closer to the surface. Furthermore, light coming from
deeper locations will be more red shifted (section 4.3) and therefore, in the case of luciferase,
be less intense. Both phenomena cause a non-linear signal contribution of deeper tissue to the
measured signal with an optical camera. In preliminary studies, the skin of the heated leg was
removed under anesthesia to expose the underlying tissue. Compared to the case with the skin
still in its place we observed a six times lower light emission when it was removed. These
results could indicate a more important heating of the skin surface then of the muscle.
However, MR temperature maps indicate no heating close to the surface. Variations in
thermal sensitivity and the ability to induce Hsp70 after stress of different tissues are two
alternative explications for the observed phenomenon.
The non-invasiveness of the proposed approach was evaluated by a systematic histological
analysis of the heated muscles. For short duration hyperthermia (i.e. 2 minutes at 43°C), no
damage was observed but, as expected, increasing the duration of the hyperthermia resulted in
an increase of induced damage in the leg muscles with substantial alteration of the muscle
appearance after 8-minute hyperthermia. This illustrates the importance of the choice of the
heating conditions in vivo to observe sufficient induction of expression avoiding tissue
damage. This justifies the fundamental importance of a precise, non invasive and quantitative
temperature measurement and control system provided by the combination of MRI
thermometry and HIFU heating.
Although, the above presented results are very encouraging for using MR guided HIFU as
technique for controlling local gene activation, there are several practical limitations that
should receive attention and improvement before translating this technique into the clinic.
Part of the problems encountered is due the small dimensions of the mouse model and will
probably be solved by using a larger biological model (e.g. rat, rabbit, pig and human). The
101
PRF based method used for MR thermometry is motion sensitive, making motion correction
unavoidable for obtaining precise temperature maps. To prevent inter-scan motion of the
mouse leg it was injected with muscle relaxant. The anesthesia did indeed prevent all inter-
scan motion, however it hampered sometimes the MR thermometry by creating black holes in
the images (i.e. pixels lacking signal). This was probably caused by the accumulation of
intramuscularly injected anesthesia or small hemorrhage. Another motion related problem is
caused by the radiation force related motion of less rigid tissue, such as fat, and the overlying
skin. Because the motion is instantaneous at the moment of HIFU activation it is impossible
to correct. In larger muscle structures no macroscopic skin motion will be observed due to the
increased muscle mass and tissue rigidity.
The small size of the mouse leg in combination with the relative large size of the focal point
poses problems at the interface of tissue and air. Due to the large difference in acoustic
impedance between tissue and air, ultrasound may be partially reflected (depending on the
angle of incidence) and thereby creating a second hot spot close to the skin, making skin
burns more likely. To prevent this from happening ultrasound gel, which has the about the
same acoustic impedance as tissue, was put on the animal’s leg, on the distal side of the US
transducer. This solution transfers the problem of a possible second hot spot outside the
animal’s leg.
Another problem related to the small dimensions of the mouse leg is the compensation of
magnetic field drift. Even without heating, the temperature in the mouse leg changes; better
said the phase change without heating. This is caused by magnetic field drift of the main
magnetic field and has to be compensated for reliable temperature maps. The most straight
forward method for compensating the magnetic field drift is subtracting the phase changes in
a region of interest with constant temperature from the phase changes in the heated region.
However, this method assumes that the magnetic field changes are similar in both regions in
absence of heating, which is a condition difficult to meet. Using the 23-mm receiver coil, in
order to obtain highest sensitivity, makes it impossible to image an unheated object (e.g. an
agar gel) placed next to the animal with the same high sensitivity. Furthermore, there is a
quick lost in field homogeneity distaly from the leg. Both phenomena make a similar change
in magnetic field drift in the heated leg and the gel very unlikely. Therefore, we have chosen
to place the ROI of the non-heated area also on the animal’s leg. In this case the ROI will be
very close to the heated region and the coil sensitivity and the field homogeneity will be
almost the same. However, there is now a possibility of low heating in the non-heated region.
102
The correct positioning of the focal point before starting the heating procedure is a general
occuring problem during treatment planning. In this study we determined the position (i.e. the
pixel) of the focal point by performing a first heating in agar gel. The same pixel should
contain the focal point in a next heating when the position of the slices is unchanged.
However, in vivo the absorption, diffusion and perfusion of heat are very heterogeneous
compared to the agar gel and may result in a physical movement of the focal point. Therefore,
a first short heating in vivo for finding the position of the focal point is inevitable, with
possible Hsp70 promoter activation as a result. Even though, the pixel containing the focal
point is found with an in vivo test, the position of the focal point may change during the actual
heating, causing problems for automatic control of temperature during heating.
Another problem occurs when spin echo images or gradient echo images with different echo
times with respect to the thermometry sequence are used for anatomical verification of the
focal point position. In this case the pixel containing the focal point (found during the first
heating) will not correspond to the same anatomical position as seen in the anatomical SE and
EPI GE images. This is due to the compensation of chemical shift induced distortion in SE
images and different chemical shift induced distortions in the phase direction of EPI GE
images.
9.5. Conclusions
In this study it was demonstrated that there is a high spatial correspondence between the
heated region and the region where transgene product (i.e. light) is found. Further, it was
shown that Hsp70 promoter was mainly induced by heat and not by mechanical stress caused
by ultrasound. The level of promoter activity can be modulated by changing the activation
protocol. Therefore, the combination of MRI guided HIFU heating and transgenes under
control of heat inducible Hsp70 promoter provides a direct, non-invasive, spatial control of
gene expression via local hyperthermia.
9.6. References
[1] Vekris A, Maurange C, Moonen C, Mazurier F, De Verneuil H, Canioni P, Voisin P.
Control of transgene expression using local hyperthermia in combination with a heat-
sensitive promoter. J Gene Med 2000;2(2):89-96.
103
[2] Gerner EW, Hersh EM, Pennington M, Tsang TC, Harris D, Vasanwala F, Brailey J.
Heat-inducible vectors for use in gene therapy. Int J Hyperthermia 2000;16(2):171-
181.
[3] Huang Q, Hu JK, Lohr F, Zhang L, Braun R, Lanzen J, Little JB, Dewhirst MW, Li
CY. Heat-induced gene expression as a novel targeted cancer gene therapy strategy.
Cancer Res 2000;60(13):3435-3439.
[4] Borrelli MJ, Schoenherr DM, Wong A, Bernock LJ, Corry PM. Heat-activated
transgene expression from adenovirus vectors infected into human prostate cancer
cells. Cancer Res 2001;61(3):1113-1121.
[5] Smith RC, Machluf M, Bromley P, Atala A, Walsh K. Spatial and temporal control of
transgene expression through ultrasound-mediated induction of the heat shock protein
70B promoter in vivo. Hum Gene Ther 2002;13(6):697-706.
[6] Xu L, Zhao Y, Zhang Q, Li Y, Xu Y. Regulation of transgene expression in muscles
by ultrasound-mediated hyperthermia. Gene Ther 2004;11(11):894-900.
[7] Silcox CE, Smith RC, King R, McDannold N, Bromley P, Walsh K, Hynynen K.
MRI-guided ultrasonic heating allows spatial control of exogenous luciferase in canine
prostate. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005;31(7):965-970.
[8] Plathow C, Lohr F, Divkovic G, Rademaker G, Farhan N, Peschke P, Zuna I, Debus J,
Claussen CD, Kauczor HU, Li CY, Jenne J, Huber P. Focal gene induction in the liver
of rats by a heat-inducible promoter using focused ultrasound hyperthermia:
preliminary results. Invest Radiol 2005;40(11):729-735.
[9] Guilhon E, Voisin P, de Zwart JA, Quesson B, Salomir R, Maurange C, Bouchaud V,
Smirnov P, de Verneuil H, Vekris A, Canioni P, Moonen CT. Spatial and temporal
control of transgene expression in vivo using a heat-sensitive promoter and MRI-
guided focused ultrasound. J Gene Med 2003;5(4):333-342.
[10] Liu Y, Kon T, Li C, Zhong P. High intensity focused ultrasound-induced gene
activation in solid tumors. J Acoust Soc Am 2006;120(1):492-501.
[11] Hundt W, Yuh EL, Steinbach S, Bednarski MD, Guccione S. Comparison of
continuous vs. pulsed focused ultrasound in treated muscle tissue as evaluated by
magnetic resonance imaging, histological analysis, and microarray analysis. Eur
Radiol 2008;18(5):993-1004.
[12] De Zwart JA, Salomir R, Vimeux F, Klaveness J, Moonen CTW. On the feasibility of
local drug delivery using thermo-sensitive liposomes and MR-guided focused
ultrasound. 2000; Denver. p 43.
104
[13] Vimeux FC, De Zwart JA, Palussiere J, Fawaz R, Delalande C, Canioni P, Grenier N,
Moonen CT. Real-time control of focused ultrasound heating based on rapid MR
thermometry. Invest Radiol 1999;34(3):190-193.
[14] Christians E, Campion E, Thompson EM, Renard JP. Expression of the HSP 70.1
gene, a landmark of early zygotic activity in the mouse embryo, is restricted to the
first burst of transcription. Development 1995;121(1):113-122.
[15] Ishihara Y, Calderon A, Watanabe H, Okamoto K, Suzuki Y, Kuroda K, Suzuki Y. A
precise and fast temperature mapping using water proton chemical shift. Magn Reson
Med 1995;34(6):814-823.
[16] Salomir R, Vimeux FC, de Zwart JA, Grenier N, Moonen CT. Hyperthermia by MR-
guided focused ultrasound: accurate temperature control based on fast MRI and a
physical model of local energy deposition and heat conduction. Magn Reson Med
2000;43(3):342-347.
[17] Patel B, Khaliq A, Jarvis-Evans J, Boulton M, Arrol S, Mackness M, McLeod D.
Hypoxia induces HSP 70 gene expression in human hepatoma (HEP G2) cells.
Biochem Mol Biol Int 1995;36(4):907-912.
[18] Richard V, Kaeffer N, Thuillez C. Delayed protection of the ischemic heart--from
pathophysiology to therapeutic applications. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 1996;10(5):409-
415.
[19] Vilaboa N, Fenna M, Munson J, Roberts SM, Voellmy R. Novel gene switches for
targeted and timed expression of proteins of interest. Mol Ther 2005;12(2):290-298.
107
Chapter 10. The role of ultrasound and molecular
imaging in local drug delivery
10.1. Introduction
Oncology is probably the domain where innovations in local drug delivery can best improve
the efficacy of therapy and safety of the patients. Despite a large range of new therapeutic
innovations such as immuno and gene therapy and drugs with lower systemic toxicity,
ordinary chemotherapy remains an often used treatment.
For an anticancer drug to kill a high proportion of cancer cells in a solid tumor, it must
overcome several boundaries (Figure 10.1). Abnormalities in both tumor vasculature and
extracellular matrix lead to alterations in transvascular and interstitial transport, respectively,
which affect ultimately the local drug concentration and thus the efficacy of chemotherapeutic
agents. Compared to normal tissue, blood vessels in tumors are very leaky [1] and lack a
lymphatic system [2], which can create increased interstititial fluid pressure [3]. As a result,
the pressure gradient between intra- and extravascular spaces is reduced, hindering transport
of (large) molecules across vessel walls by convection. Furthermore, the structure and
function of the vascular system is disorganized in solid tumors, increasing the mean distance
between tumor cells and blood vessels [4,5]. This can lead to reduced access of cytotoxic
drugs to those distant tumor cells. Once a molecule has crossed the vessel wall into the tumor,
it must travel through the interstitium to the tumor cells and, depending on the site of action of
the drug, either bind to a membrane receptor or cross the cell membrane. Nearly uniform
pressure, binding to extracellular matrix [6,7] and enzymatic destruction are some of the
problems encountered by molecules crossing the interstitium. In addition, size and charge of
molecules may hinder their transport across the cell membrane [8].
108
Figure 10.1 A diagram of physiological barriers to drug delivery into tumor cells after
systemic administration. The barriers include microvessel wall, extracellularmatrix, and
plasma membrane of cells. They hinder (1) transvascular, (2) interstitial, and (3)
transmembrane transport of drugs, respectively, as indicated by the corresponding numbers
and the open arrows next to them. Adapted from [9].
In general, there are two strategies for overcoming the transport barriers and thereby improve
the efficacy of cancer treatment. The first strategy is modification of the drug by specific
targeting or changing size (by incorporation into a carrier) to increase accumulation at the
tumor site. For example, paclitaxel-loaded nanoparticles were shown to exhibit greater
efficacy when they were conjugated to transferring (Tf) ligand [10]. The greater efficacy is
due to cellular uptake of Tf-conjugated nanoparticles via Tf receptors instead of non specific
endocytosis [11]. Dreher et al. investigated the relationship between molecular weight of
different macromolecular drug carriers and tumor vascular permeability. They showed that
there is an optimal molecular weight for macromolecular drug carriers that results in the
highest accumulation in the tumor [12]. The second strategy is the modification of the tumor’s
physiology to reduce its resistance to the drug accumulation. The tumor blood flow can be
improved by pretreating a tumor with anti-angiogenic therapy, which leads to the
normalization of the tumor vasculature and as a consequence to a reduced interstitial fluid
pressure [13,14]. Modifications of the tumor extracellular matrix [15] and reduction of the
drug
109
interstitial fluid pressure [16,17] might also facilitate the penetration of drugs into the tumor.
Other methods that are being developed for enhancing local drug delivery involve external
sources of energy (ultrasound, magnetic and electric fields) that change the physiology of the
tumor or induce the local drug release from specially designed carriers [18].
10.2. Ultrasound facilitated local drug delivery
A large number of these physical methods, developed to reduce transport barriers as a way to
improve the delivery of cytotoxic agents, are based on therapeutic ultrasound exposure and its
interaction with tissue. In the general introduction of this thesis (section 2.3) the different
interactions of ultrasound with tissue were discussed in detail. Below, we briefly review how
local ultrasonic heating, cavitation and radiation force have been exploited in the field of local
drug delivery [19].
Hyperthermia may be particularly helpful in facilitating drug deposition in tumors. As tissue
temperature rises, one of the first physiological reactions is an increase in tumor blood flow,
causing increased delivery of a drug [20]. Furthermore, an increased tumor microvessel pore
size has been noticed in some studies during heating resulting in an increased extravasation of
drug delivery vehicles from tumor vessels [21,22]. This effect is visualized in Figure 10.2
[23]. In contrast, there is no effect on liposomal extravasation from normal vessels [22].
Therefore the increased extravasation of liposomes due to local heating can be exploited as a
drug delivery mechanism in cancer, particularly because the effect appears to be more
important in tumors. Additionally, hyperthermia can be used as a modality for increasing
liposomal drug delivery to tumors by spatially and temporally controlled release of drug from
the liposome [24]. Using liposomes for encapsulating drugs is an effective way to improve
drug delivery to solid tumors, compared to the drug alone, where systemic toxicity is lowered
and uptake into cells is increased [25]. The potential of using temperature-sensitive liposomes
in combination with local hyperthermia for targeted control of local drug release was first
shown by Weinstein and Yatvin [26,27]. Liposomes remain relatively stable in the circulation
at temperatures well below the phase transition temperature (Tc) of the liposome membrane.
At Tc distinctive structural changes occur in the lipid bilayer resulting in increased membrane
permeability and the accompanying release of the liposomes’ content [28-30]. The elevated
temperature needed for the release of the liposomes’ content may be generated by water bath
[24], catheter [31], radio frequency [28,32] or microwave [33]. However, local hyperthermia
110
generated by focused ultrasound has a large potential to become a clinical tool, because of its
high spatial precision and non-invasive nature [30,34,35].
Figure 10.2 Epi-illumination images of tumor tissue (human ovarian carcinoma) implanted in
nude mouse with its dorsal skin flap placed in a window chamber. Extravasation of 100 nm
rhodamine-labeled liposomes from tumor vessels at 60 minutes after injection at different
temperatures are shown. (a) 34°C; (b) 39°C; (c) 40°C; (d) 41°C; (e) 42°C. Minimal
extravasation of liposomes was seen at 34°C throughout the 60-minute experiment. At 42°C,
focal perivascular fluorescent spots developed that increased in size and became more
diffuse. From [23].
As with heat also acoustic cavitation can play multiple roles in local drug delivery. Vibrating
and collapsing microbubbles may cause, as discussed before, increased permeability of the
cell membranes and disrupt the shell of co-delivered carriers thereby releasing the enclosed
drugs, resulting in an increased local drug concentration and an enhanced extravasation of the
drug. This approach, whereby microbubbles only serve as cavitation nuclei, may be
principally successful in the microvasculature. In larger vessels, an important part of the drug
will be released in the centre of the vessel and consequently not reach the extravascular
spaces. In this case, it may be helpful to position the drug delivery system first closer to the
vessel wall, using the non-destructive radiation force (as was describe before section 2.4) and
111
then apply high intensity ultrasound pulses for microbubble destruction [36]. Another strategy
of using microbubbles in drug delivery is by loading the microbubbles with the drugs. In this
case the destruction of microbubbles leads to the release of the drug and extravasation of the
drug due to the increased number of pores in the vasculature. Recent examples of this strategy
are the delivery of anti-sense androgen receptor oligodeoxynucleotide in vivo, resulting in
inhibition of prostate tumor growth [37] and the use of a conjugation between microbubbles
and liposomes carrying the payload [38]. The feasibility of both strategies has been proven
mainly by using (reporter) genes as payload [39-41]. The microbubbles loaded with
drugs/genes can be targeted to specific (pathologic) sites using different targeting ligands
incorporated into bioconjugates [42]. Microbubbles are successfully targeted to the
pathophysiologic processes like inflammation [43], angiogenesis [44] and thrombus formation
[45], important in many disease states (e.g. atheroscelerosis, tumors, transplant rejection,
etc.). Although the targeted microbubbles in these applications improve the efficacy of
diagnostic imaging, they may also improve ultrasound facilitated drug delivery by increasing
the local concentration near the vessel wall. Since US can be focused, well-defined regions
can be treated. Targeted delivery vehicles may further enhance this on a microscopic scale.
Furthermore, as the microbubbles are relatively stable and circulate through the whole body,
they may passively accumulate at unwanted sites and become toxic. This toxic effect at
unwanted sites can also be reduced by targeting the drug carrying microbubbles to specific
tissues.
The contribution of the radiation force to drug delivery may not only be the induction of gaps
between endothelial cells, widening intracellular spaces in epithelial tissue and positioning the
carriers closer to the vessel wall. Crowder et al. showed that the acoustic radiation force was
the physical mechanism for the augmentation of lipid delivery from nanoparticles. The
acoustic energy, at non-cavitational level, stimulates increased interaction between the
nanoparticle’s lipid layer and the targeted cell’s plasma membrane and thereby improves the
transport of the drugs [46].
10.3. Imaging of drug delivery
A first (important) step for improving the efficacy of anticancer therapy and minimize
systemic toxicity is the reduction of transport barriers by changing the properties of the drug
(carrier) or/and the tumor’s physiology as described above. Though, maybe as important as
facilitating delivery is monitoring non-invasively the drug’s pharmacokinetics (absorption,
112
distribution, metabolism and elimination) and pharmacodynamics (drug effects, tolerance,
altered blood flow, toxicity, etc) with a high sensitivity and spatial resolution. Following the
distribution and the metabolism of a drug in vivo gives insight in the behavior and fate of a
drug in a living system and is essential in drug development and treatment optimization.
There is a large spectrum of non-invasive techniques to monitor drug delivery (Figure 10.3).
On the basis of its physics and chemistry, each imaging technique has certain limitations or
advantages with respect to resolution, sensitivity and contrast generation. Below these
limitations and advantages of each imaging modality are discussed specifically for monitoring
drug delivery.
113
Figure 10.3 Multiple imaging modalities are available for small-animal molecular imaging.
Shown are views of typical instruments available and illustrative examples of images that can
be obtained with these modalities. (A) Positron Emission Tomography (B) Computed
Tomography (C) Single Photon Emission CT (D) Optical reflectance fluorescence imaging
(E) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (F) Optical bioluminescence imaging. Many of these
imaging modalities are in routine clinical use, making translation from animal model to bed
side possible.
Local concentrations of drugs for therapy are in the range of µM. Only nuclear medicine
techniques such as gamma-scintigraphy, single-photon emission computer tomography
(SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET), and optical techniques have the required
114
sensitivity to detect micromolar concentrations. However, nuclear medicine methods are
hampered by relatively low spatial resolution (1.5 mm) which, although acceptable in clinical
applications, presents a serious limitation when studying small animals. Furthermore, these
methods lack chemical specificity, being unable to distinguish whether the emitting
radioisotope is the parent drug molecule or a metabolite. Nuclear medicine techniques are also
lacking intrinsic anatomic information and require the use of radioactive tracers.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), on the other hand, provides high spatial resolution (pixel
dimensions of 100 µm and better) and is non-invasive, but MRI requires tissue concentrations
in the millimolar range. Due to the high spatial resolution detailed morphological information
can be obtained in the small animal models predominantly used in pharmacological research.
However, the low sensitivity makes the use of ingenious amplification strategies necessary to
detect the low drug concentrations. The use of MRI for monitoring pharmacokinetics and
dynamics offers other advantages. First, since the method is non-invasive it allows repetitive
measurements in the same animal, which leads to statistical and economical advantages and
decreased used of animals. Secondly, MRI takes advantage of the enormous library of
acquisition sequences that provide different image contrast that leads to a high contrast
resolution, i.e. the ability to distinguish the differences between two arbitrarily similar but not
identical tissues. Besides the larger number of endogenous parameters (proton density,
relaxation times, water diffusion, water exchange rates) that provide optimal contrast for
different soft-tissue structures, MRI also exploits a large range of so-called biomarkers. A MR
biomarker is an anatomic, physiologic, biochemical or molecular parameter detectable with
MRI used to establish the presence or the rate of a process of interest, such as a disease or the
deposition of a drug. Examples of MR biomarkers are perfusion and diffusion studies,
magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and contrast agents. Perfusion studies, based on the
dynamic tracking of a bolus of contrast agent, allow early evaluation of anti-angiogenesis
therapies [47,48]. Imaging of water diffusion has also shown great potential in early
evaluation of drug response [49-52]. Spectroscopy studies provide an early analysis of
modifications of metabolism, such as that of choline, a marker of tumor metabolism [53]. The
concentration of the drug itself can also be monitored by MRS when the drug contains atoms
with magnetic nuclei in their structure (e.g. misanidazole (2H) [54], 5-fluorouracil (19F) [55]
and ifosfamide (31P) [56]). However, at the moment the MRS signal is only sufficient for 5-
fluorouracil at concentrations used for therapeutic action. MR contrast agents (e.g.
gadolinium, iron oxide particles) can be loaded into or attached to drug delivery vehicles such
115
as liposomes and micelles, which allows real-time monitoring of the distribution of the carrier
in vivo [57,58].
Other imaging methods used for monitoring drug pharmacokinetics are ultrasound (US) and
optical imaging. US imaging appears as very suitable method when using microbubbles as
drug delivery vehicles, because of its very high sensitivity. Even a single microbubble may be
detected. However, upon the collapse of the microbubble and release of the drug, this
hyperechogenicity disappears. Therefore US imaging can only be used to follow the delivery
vehicle to the location for release, but the subsequent pathway of the drug can not be
monitored directly. Optical imaging methods (fluorescence and bioluminescence) are gaining
more and more interest as monitoring modalities, essentially because of the high sensitivity
(10-12 moles/L [59]), albeit only for small animals because of absorption of light by tissue
[60]. But also the large choice in probes and the possibility to work at different wavelengths
makes optical imaging a versatile technique. A very sophisticated example of fluorescence
imaging in drug delivery was shown by Bagalkot et al. [61]. They developed a
multifunctional nanoparticle that is capable of sensing the release of therapeutic modality by a
change in the fluorescence of the imaging modality.
The best way to monitor the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a drug is to follow
the drug itself. With PET this is possible for all drugs containing in their structure a
radionuclide (e.g. 18F, 11C and 15O). The same is true for drugs that contain in their structure
atoms with magnetic nuclei when using MRS as imaging method. In MRI this is done by
attaching [62] or co-injecting [63] MR contrast agents with the drug. When the contrast is co-
injected with the drug the relation between the drug concentration and the signal distribution
of the contrast agent has to be known. In case the contrast agent is attached to the drug this
relationship is known, but the contrast agent may modulate the pharmacokinetics of the drug
compared to the unbound state. A new approach is loading the drug and the contrast agent in
the same delivery system [64]. Viglianti et al. used MnSO4/doxorubicin loaded liposomes to
monitor in vivo liposome concentration distribution and drug release [31]. In a follow-up
study they confirmed that there was a linear relationship between a change in MRI contrast
and the amount of deposited drugs [65]. Results from this study are shown in Figure 10.4.
116
Figure 10.4 Validation of T1-map based doxorubicin (DOX) concentrations released from
temperature-sensitive liposomes (TSL) loaded with MnSO4 by invasive methods in two
independent studies. (A,D) Raw signal intensity map (0-125 a.u. color bar) shows an axial
view of a rat bearing a flank fibrosarcoma (top left) with a central heating catheter at
beginning and at 45 min after DOX injection, respectively. (B,E) T1-intensity map (0-3000 ms
color bar) at beginning and at 45 min after injection, respectively. Note that the regions that
are enhanced in d have reduced T1 intensity in e, indicating contrast/drug presence through
T1 shortening. (C) The calculated DOX concentration (ng/mg) on a pixel-by-pixel basis using
images b and e. (F) An enlarged image of c showing the heterogeneity in drug delivery that
can be imaged and quantified by this MRI technique. (G) The results for the HPLC validated
[DOX] measurements from each animal. (H) The results for the fluorescence validated
[DOX] measurements. i: An overlay of both experiments is displayed, showing the precision
and accuracy of MRI for measuring DOX at lower concentrations. Figure adapted from[65].
To take maximal profit of the different imaging modalities in drug delivery, they should not
only be used for real-time monitoring of drug distribution, but also for treatment planning and
follow-up. However, each analysis has specific requirements that can not be found all in the
same image modality. Therefore, in order to prevent making concessions on essential
parameters (such as spatial resolution, sensitivity, cost, availability etc.) of the analysis,
117
hybrid systems are used more and more. Combinations of two or more different imaging
modalities such as PET/MR [66], PET/CT [67] and MR/fluorescence [68,69] combine the
strengths of the different imaging techniques to fulfil the demanding requirements in local
drug delivery.
10.4. References
[1] Gerlowski LE, Jain RK. Microvascular permeability of normal and neoplastic tissues.
Microvasc Res 1986;31(3):288-305.
[2] Leu AJ, Berk DA, Lymboussaki A, Alitalo K, Jain RK. Absence of functional
lymphatics within a murine sarcoma: a molecular and functional evaluation. Cancer
Res 2000;60(16):4324-4327.
[3] Boucher Y, Baxter LT, Jain RK. Interstitial pressure gradients in tissue-isolated and
subcutaneous tumors: implications for therapy. Cancer Res 1990;50(15):4478-4484.
[4] Jain RK. Delivery of molecular medicine to solid tumors. Science
1996;271(5252):1079-1080.
[5] Jain RK. The next frontier of molecular medicine: delivery of therapeutics. Nat Med
1998;4(6):655-657.
[6] Berk DA, Yuan F, Leunig M, Jain RK. Direct in vivo measurement of targeted
binding in a human tumor xenograft. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997;94(5):1785-
1790.
[7] Juweid M, Neumann R, Paik C, Perez-Bacete MJ, Sato J, van Osdol W, Weinstein JN.
Micropharmacology of monoclonal antibodies in solid tumors: direct experimental
evidence for a binding site barrier. Cancer Res 1992;52(19):5144-5153.
[8] Schlicher RK, Radhakrishna H, Tolentino TP, Apkarian RP, Zarnitsyn V, Prausnitz
MR. Mechanism of intracellular delivery by acoustic cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol
2006;32(6):915-924.
[9] Wang Y, Yuan F. Delivery of viral vectors to tumor cells: extracellular transport,
systemic distribution, and strategies for improvement. Ann Biomed Eng
2006;34(1):114-127.
[10] Sahoo SK, Ma W, Labhasetwar V. Efficacy of transferrin-conjugated paclitaxel-
loaded nanoparticles in a murine model of prostate cancer. Int J Cancer
2004;112(2):335-340.
118
[11] Wagner E, Curiel D, Cotten M. Delivery of drugs, proteins and genes into cells using
transferrin as a ligand for receptor-mediated endocytosis. Adv Drug Delivery Rev
1994;14(1):113-135.
[12] Dreher MR, Liu W, Michelich CR, Dewhirst MW, Yuan F, Chilkoti A. Tumor
vascular permeability, accumulation, and penetration of macromolecular drug carriers.
J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98(5):335-344.
[13] Jain RK. Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: a new
paradigm for combination therapy. Nat Med 2001;7(9):987-989.
[14] Jain RK. Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic
therapy. Science 2005;307(5706):58-62.
[15] McKee TD, Grandi P, Mok W, Alexandrakis G, Insin N, Zimmer JP, Bawendi MG,
Boucher Y, Breakefield XO, Jain RK. Degradation of fibrillar collagen in a human
melanoma xenograft improves the efficacy of an oncolytic herpes simplex virus
vector. Cancer Res 2006;66(5):2509-2513.
[16] Griffon-Etienne G, Boucher Y, Brekken C, Suit HD, Jain RK. Taxane-induced
apoptosis decompresses blood vessels and lowers interstitial fluid pressure in solid
tumors: clinical implications. Cancer Res 1999;59(15):3776-3782.
[17] Rubin K, Sjoquist M, Gustafsson AM, Isaksson B, Salvessen G, Reed RK. Lowering
of tumoral interstitial fluid pressure by prostaglandin E(1) is paralleled by an increased
uptake of (51)Cr-EDTA. Int J Cancer 2000;86(5):636-643.
[18] Besic E. Physical mechanisms and methods employed in drug delivery to tumors. Acta
Pharm 2007;57(3):249-268.
[19] Tachibana K, Tachibana S. The use of ultrasound for drug delivery. Echocardiography
2001;18(4):323-328.
[20] Karino T, Koga S, Maeta M. Experimental studies of the effects of local hyperthermia
on blood flow, oxygen pressure and pH in tumors. Jpn J Surg 1988;18(3):276-283.
[21] Gaber MH, Wu NZ, Hong K, Huang SK, Dewhirst MW, Papahadjopoulos D.
Thermosensitive liposomes: extravasation and release of contents in tumor
microvascular networks. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996;36(5):1177-1187.
[22] Kong G, Braun RD, Dewhirst MW. Hyperthermia enables tumor-specific nanoparticle
delivery: effect of particle size. Cancer Res 2000;60(16):4440-4445.
[23] Kong G, Braun RD, Dewhirst MW. Characterization of the effect of hyperthermia on
nanoparticle extravasation from tumor vasculature. Cancer Res 2001;61(7):3027-
3032.
119
[24] Kong G, Anyarambhatla G, Petros WP, Braun RD, Colvin OM, Needham D, Dewhirst
MW. Efficacy of liposomes and hyperthermia in a human tumor xenograft model:
importance of triggered drug release. Cancer Res 2000;60(24):6950-6957.
[25] Allen TM. Liposomes. Opportunities in drug delivery. Drugs 1997;54 Suppl 4:8-14.
[26] Weinstein JN, Magin RL, Yatvin MB, Zaharko DS. Liposomes and local
hyperthermia: selective delivery of methotrexate to heated tumors. Science
1979;204(4389):188-191.
[27] Yatvin MB, Weinstein JN, Dennis WH, Blumenthal R. Design of liposomes for
enhanced local release of drugs by hyperthermia. Science 1978;202(4374):1290-1293.
[28] Bos C, Lepetit-Coiffe M, Quesson B, Moonen CT. Simultaneous monitoring of
temperature and T1: methods and preliminary results of application to drug delivery
using thermosensitive liposomes. Magn Reson Med 2005;54(4):1020-1024.
[29] Fossheim SL, Il'yasov KA, Hennig J, Bjornerud A. Thermosensitive paramagnetic
liposomes for temperature control during MR imaging-guided hyperthermia: in vitro
feasibility studies. Acad Radiol 2000;7(12):1107-1115.
[30] Frenkel V, Etherington A, Greene M, Quijano J, Xie J, Hunter F, Dromi S, Li KC.
Delivery of liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) in a breast cancer tumor model:
investigation of potential enhancement by pulsed-high intensity focused ultrasound
exposure. Acad Radiol 2006;13(4):469-479.
[31] Viglianti BL, Abraham SA, Michelich CR, Yarmolenko PS, MacFall JR, Bally MB,
Dewhirst MW. In vivo monitoring of tissue pharmacokinetics of liposome/drug using
MRI: illustration of targeted delivery. Magn Reson Med 2004;51(6):1153-1162.
[32] Aoki H, Kakinuma K, Morita K, Kato M, Uzuka T, Igor G, Takahashi H, Tanaka R.
Therapeutic efficacy of targeting chemotherapy using local hyperthermia and
thermosensitive liposome: evaluation of drug distribution in a rat glioma model.
International Journal of Hyperthermia 2004;20(6):595-605.
[33] Khoobehi B, Peyman GA, Niesman MR, Oncel M. Hyperthermia and temperature-
sensitive liposomes: selective delivery of drugs into the eye. Jpn J Ophthalmol
1989;33(4):405-412.
[34] Dromi S, Frenkel V, Luk A, Traughber B, Angstadt M, Bur M, Poff J, Jianwu Xie J,
Libutti SK, Li KCP, B.J. W. Pulsed-High Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Low
Temperature Sensitive Liposomes for EnhancedTargeted Drug Delivery and
Antitumor Effect. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13(9):2722-2727.
120
[35] McDannold N, Fossheim SL, Rasmussen H, Martin H, Natalia Vykhodtseva N,
Hynynen K. Heat-activated liposomal MR contrast agent: initial in vivo results in
rabbit liver and kidney. Radiology 2004;230(3):743-752.
[36] Shortencarier MJ, Dayton PA, Bloch SH, Schumann PA, Matsunaga TO, Ferrara KW.
A method for radiation-force localized drug delivery using gas-filled lipospheres.
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2004;51(7):822-831.
[37] Haag P, Frauscher F, Gradl J, Seitz A, Schafer G, Lindner JR, Klibanov AL, Bartsch
G, Klocker H, Eder IE. Microbubble-enhanced ultrasound to deliver an antisense
oligodeoxynucleotide targeting the human androgen receptor into prostate tumours. J
Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2006;102(1-5):103-113.
[38] Kheirolomoom A, Dayton PA, Lum AF, Little E, Paoli EE, Zheng H, Ferrara KW.
Acoustically-active microbubbles conjugated to liposomes: Characterization of a
proposed drug delivery vehicle. J Control Release 2006.
[39] Miller DL, Pislaru SV, Greenleaf JE. Sonoporation: mechanical DNA delivery by
ultrasonic cavitation. Somat Cell Mol Genet 2002;27(1-6):115-134.
[40] Shohet RV, Chen S, Zhou YT, Wang Z, Meidell RS, Unger RH, Grayburn PA.
Echocardiographic destruction of albumin microbubbles directs gene delivery to the
myocardium. Circulation 2000;101(22):2554-2556.
[41] Vannan M, McCreery T, Li P, Han Z, Unger E, Kuersten B, Nabel E, Rajagopalan S.
Ultrasound-mediated transfection of canine myocardium by intravenous
administration of cationic microbubble-linked plasmid DNA. J Am Soc Echocardiogr
2002;15(3):214-218.
[42] Klibanov AL. Microbubble contrast agents: targeted ultrasound imaging and
ultrasound-assisted drug-delivery applications. Invest Radiol 2006;41(3):354-362.
[43] Lindner JR, Coggins MP, Kaul S, Klibanov AL, Brandenburger GH, Ley K.
Microbubble persistence in the microcirculation during ischemia/reperfusion and
inflammation is caused by integrin- and complement-mediated adherence to activated
leukocytes. Circulation 2000;101(6):668-675.
[44] Ellegala DB, Leong-Poi H, Carpenter JE, Klibanov AL, Kaul S, Shaffrey ME, Sklenar
J, Lindner JR. Imaging tumor angiogenesis with contrast ultrasound and microbubbles
targeted to alpha(v)beta3. Circulation 2003;108(3):336-341.
[45] Schumann PA, Christiansen JP, Quigley RM, McCreery TP, Sweitzer RH, Unger EC,
Lindner JR, Matsunaga TO. Targeted-microbubble binding selectively to GPIIb IIIa
receptors of platelet thrombi. Invest Radiol 2002;37(11):587-593.
121
[46] Crowder KC, Hughes MS, Marsh JN, Barbieri AM, Fuhrhop RW, Lanza GM,
Wickline SA. Sonic activation of molecularly-targeted nanoparticles accelerates
transmembrane lipid delivery to cancer cells through contact-mediated mechanisms:
implications for enhanced local drug delivery. Ultrasound Med Biol
2005;31(12):1693-1700.
[47] Miyazaki K, Collins DJ, Walker-Samuel S, Taylor JN, Padhani AR, Leach MO, Koh
DM. Quantitative mapping of hepatic perfusion index using MR imaging: a potential
reproducible tool for assessing tumour response to treatment with the antiangiogenic
compound BIBF 1120, a potent triple angiokinase inhibitor. Eur Radiol
2008;18(7):1414-1421.
[48] Muruganandham M, Lupu M, Dyke JP, Matei C, Linn M, Packman K, Kolinsky K,
Higgins B, Koutcher JA. Preclinical evaluation of tumor microvascular response to a
novel antiangiogenic/antitumor agent RO0281501 by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
at 1.5 T. Mol Cancer Ther 2006;5(8):1950-1957.
[49] Cui Y, Zhang XP, Sun YS, Tang L, Shen L. Apparent diffusion coefficient: potential
imaging biomarker for prediction and early detection of response to chemotherapy in
hepatic metastases. Radiology 2008;248(3):894-900.
[50] Dudeck O, Zeile M, Pink D, Pech M, Tunn PU, Reichardt P, Ludwig WD, Hamm B.
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging allows monitoring of anticancer
treatment effects in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas. J Magn Reson Imaging
2008;27(5):1109-1113.
[51] Jordan BF, Runquist M, Raghunand N, Baker A, Williams R, Kirkpatrick L, Powis G,
Gillies RJ. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion MRI show rapid and dramatic
changes in tumor microenvironment in response to inhibition of HIF-1alpha using PX-
478. Neoplasia 2005;7(5):475-485.
[52] Kim H, Morgan DE, Zeng H, Grizzle WE, Warram JM, Stockard CR, Wang D, Zinn
KR. Breast tumor xenografts: diffusion-weighted MR imaging to assess early therapy
with novel apoptosis-inducing anti-DR5 antibody. Radiology 2008;248(3):844-851.
[53] Glunde K, Jacobs MA, Bhujwalla ZM. Choline metabolism in cancer: implications for
diagnosis and therapy. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2006;6(6):821-829.
[54] Evelhoch JL, McCoy CL, Giri BP. A method for direct in vivo measurement of drug
concentrations from a single 2H NMR spectrum. Magn Reson Med 1989;9(3):402-
410.
122
[55] Brix G, Bellemann ME, Haberkorn U, Gerlach L, Bachert P, Lorenz WJ. Mapping the
biodistribution and catabolism of 5-fluorouracil in tumor-bearing rats by chemical-
shift selective 19F MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 1995;34(3):302-307.
[56] Rodrigues LM, Maxwell RJ, McSheehy PM, Pinkerton CR, Robinson SP, Stubbs M,
Griffiths JR. In vivo detection of ifosfamide by 31P-MRS in rat tumours: increased
uptake and cytotoxicity induced by carbogen breathing in GH3 prolactinomas. Br J
Cancer 1997;75(1):62-68.
[57] Mulder WJ, Strijkers GJ, van Tilborg GA, Griffioen AW, Nicolay K. Lipid-based
nanoparticles for contrast-enhanced MRI and molecular imaging. NMR Biomed
2006;19(1):142-164.
[58] Torchilin VP. Multifunctional nanocarriers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2006;58(14):1532-
1555.
[59] Massoud TF, Gambhir SS. Molecular imaging in living subjects: seeing fundamental
biological processes in a new light. Genes Dev 2003;17(5):545-580.
[60] Gumbleton M, Stephens DJ. Coming out of the dark: the evolving role of fluorescence
imaging in drug delivery research. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005;57(1):5-15.
[61] Bagalkot V, Zhang L, Levy-Nissenbaum E, Jon S, Kantoff PW, Langer R, Farokhzad
OC. Quantum dot-aptamer conjugates for synchronous cancer imaging, therapy, and
sensing of drug delivery based on bi-fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Nano
Lett 2007;7(10):3065-3070.
[62] Peira E, Marzola P, Podio V, Aime S, Sbarbati A, Gasco MR. In vitro and in vivo
study of solid lipid nanoparticles loaded with superparamagnetic iron oxide. J Drug
Target 2003;11(1):19-24.
[63] Saito R, Bringas JR, McKnight TR, Wendland MF, Mamot C, Drummond DC,
Kirpotin DB, Park JW, Berger MS, Bankiewicz KS. Distribution of liposomes into
brain and rat brain tumor models by convection-enhanced delivery monitored with
magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer Res 2004;64(7):2572-2579.
[64] De Zwart JA, Salomir R, Vimeux F, Klaveness J, Moonen CTW. On the feasibility of
local drug delivery using thermo-sensitive liposomes and MR-guided focused
ultrasound. 2000; Denver. p 43.
[65] Viglianti BL, Ponce AM, Michelich CR, Yu D, Abraham SA, Sanders L, Yarmolenko
PS, Schroeder T, MacFall JR, Barboriak DP, Colvin OM, Bally MB, Dewhirst MW.
Chemodosimetry of in vivo tumor liposomal drug concentration using MRI. Magn
Reson Med 2006;56(5):1011-1018.
123
[66] Pichler BJ, Judenhofer MS, Wehrl HF. PET/MRI hybrid imaging: devices and initial
results. Eur Radiol 2008;18(6):1077-1086.
[67] Chowdhury FU, Scarsbrook AF. The role of hybrid SPECT-CT in oncology: current
and emerging clinical applications. Clin Radiol 2008;63(3):241-251.
[68] Kircher MF, Weissleder R, Josephson L. A dual fluorochrome probe for imaging
proteases. Bioconjug Chem 2004;15(2):242-248.
[69] Mulder WJ, Strijkers GJ, Habets JW, Bleeker EJ, van der Schaft DW, Storm G,
Koning GA, Griffioen AW, Nicolay K. MR molecular imaging and fluorescence
microscopy for identification of activated tumor endothelium using a bimodal lipidic
nanoparticle. Faseb J 2005;19(14):2008-2010.
125
Chapter 11. MRI monitoring of ultrasound
mediated drug delivery
11.1. Introduction
The pharmacological action of a chemotherapeutic drug, as well as its toxicological effect is
related to its tissue concentration. Therefore, a local increase of therapeutic drug in the region
where therapy is required would increase the efficacy of the therapy with a reduced systemic
toxicity. Modification of the drug (carrier) or the tissue’s physiology may reduce the
resistance to drug accumulation in the pathologic tissue [1]. It has been shown that therapeutic
ultrasound can improve the delivery of genes and drugs into cells [2-6] and can alter vascular
permeability for increased extravasation and hence improved delivery to whole tissues [7,8].
However, interaction of ultrasound with living tissues may also cause irreversible tissue
damage, such as microvessel rupture [9], hemorrhage [10], apoptosis [11], hemolysis [12] and
necrosis [13], which are incompatible with the objective of non destructive drug deposition.
The likelihood of the desired as well as the adverse effects, depends on the interaction of
ultrasound with tissue [14,15].
Cavitation is considered as the most important mechanism to enhance gene/drug delivery.
This effect can be induced in deep tissue non-invasively by ultrasound waves, depending on
the frequency and pressure of the sonication. The threshold of acoustic pressure for inducing
cavitation can be lowered by administration of US contrast agent [16], reducing the possibility
of other physical effects such as tissue heating.
The efficacy of increased delivery by cavitation is influenced by acoustic parameters, tissue
characteristics and the type of US contrast agent, if present. Rahim et al. and Zarnitsyn et al.
have investigated in vitro the influence of several physical sonication parameters and
microbubbles concentration on the efficacy of intracellular gene delivery [17,18]. Hallow et
al. have analyzed the influence of different acoustic energy levels on the delivery of an optical
contrast agent as pseudo-drug in ex vivo arteries [19]. Most in vivo optimization of ultrasound
mediated drug delivery is performed with anticancer cytotoxic agents. The efficacy of the
used parameters is determined from tumor regression after sonication. Larkin et al. showed,
using a tumor model, the influence of acoustic energy intensity, duration of sonication and
duty cycle on the cytotoxicity of bleomycin [20]. Iwanaga et al. showed in a similar
126
experiment that presence of microbubbles increases the therapeutic effect of bleomycin [21].
Bekeredjian et al. have shown an increased capillary permeability in tumor and muscle using
Evans Blue as reporter molecule [22].
Although it was obvious from these studies that ultrasound improved the therapeutic effect,
distinct differences between the different ultrasound protocols were only observable after 3 to
4 days. Despite the growing interest of such non-invasive therapeutic approaches, no real-time
imaging methods have been proposed to monitor the effect of different sonication parameters.
Non-invasive and near real-time monitoring with high sensitivity and spatial resolution of the
pharmacokinetic and dynamic effects during drug deposition is essential for treatment
optimization.
Visualization of the local deposition of a MR contrast agent in the brain was proposed by
Treat et al [23]. In their study, the local disruption of the blood-brain barrier by focalized
pulsed US was visualized immediately after the procedure on T1-weighted images by
injecting a MR contrast agent. The delivered doses of MR contrast agent and of co-
administrered drug (Doxorubicin) were demonstrated to be dependent on the acoustic power
and injected US contrast agent. However, no analysis of the time course of the effect was
investigated.
This study presents a method for monitoring in vivo with MRI the changes of distribution of a
reporter macromolecule in hepatic tissue induced by cavitation. Experiments were performed
on small animals with clinical US imaging and MRI devices. Cavitation effect was enhanced
with the help of a clinically accepted contrast agent (Sonovue) and the reporter
macromolecule was a MRI contrast agent (Vistarem). This macromolecule influences the
longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of the MR signal but does not spontaneously diffuse outside
the vasculature [24]. Therefore, modifying the local distribution of Vistarem in hepatic tissue
by cavitation should result in apparent T1 modifications. Comparison of T1 changes in time of
hepatic tissue in presence or absence of cavitation should thus provide a non-invasive
estimate of the relative influence of sonication characteristics (e.g. pressure, duration,
presence of microbubbles) on the potential extravasation effects.
127
11.2. Materials and methods
Animal
Male Wistar rats (350 to 550g) were anesthetized with isoflurane in air (3% for the induction,
and 2% for the remaining experiment). The abdomen was carefully shaved with depilatory
cream to improve ultrasound propagation in the liver. A 24-gauge cannula (Insyte®, BD) was
inserted into a tail. A continuous slow perfusion of sodium chloride (0.9%) was maintained
until injections of US and MRI contrast agents were performed through this catheter with the
help of a 3 track line tap. This animal procedure was approved by the university committee
for the use and care of animals.
US contrast agent
SonovVue (Bracco) is a microbubble contrast agent of the second generation consisting of a
sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) gas core surrounded by a thin and flexible shell of phospholipids.
Sonovue contains microbubbles of different sizes, ranging between 1 and 10 µm, with a mean
size of 2.5 µm [25]. In humans the maximum blood concentration is reached within 1-2
minutes and then rapidly declines (T1/2 ~ 7 minutes) [26]. There is no such information for
rodents. Sonovue was prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions; leading to a
concentration of microbubbles in the range of 1,0·109 microbubbles per ml . Sonovue was
injected in a slow bolus at the dose of 0,05ml/100g through the perfusion line.
MRI contrast agent
P792 (Gadomelitol, Vistarem ®, Guerbet) is a macromolecular blood pool MR contrast agent
with rapid clearance (T1/2 ~ 20 minutes) [27]. This contrast agent was selected in the present
study since it remains in the blood for a prolonged time and has a higher relaxivity as
compared to conventional gadolinium based contrast agents (e.g. Dotarem and Magnevist).
Therefore, it may serve as MR reporter agent for monitoring changes of capillary permeability
of the rat liver induced by destruction of Sonovue by ultrasound. This blood pool contrast
agent was administered in a slow bolus (20-30 sec) at the dose of 40 µmol/kg through the
perfusion line.
Ultrasound device
A clinical echograph (Acuson sequoia 512-Siemens) was used at an operating frequency of 2
MHz with the 4C1 transducer. The probe was positioned on the abdomen after application of
a colloid on the skin. Localization of the liver was performed on two dimensional echographic
128
images prior to injection of Sonovue, with a scan depth of 3.5 cm and a constant focus located
at half of this value. The CPS (cadence Contrast Pulse Sequence) mode was used to visualize
the arrival of microbubbles into the liver (about 3 to 5 seconds after injection) and was rapidly
switched to the pulsed mode imaging with color Doppler for potential local destruction of
microbubbles. Destruction of microbubbles within the liver was visualized on the screen of
the echograph. Manipulation of the echograph was systematically performed by the same
operator to minimize inter-operator variation.
Magnetic resonance imaging
Dynamic measurements of T1 values were performed on Philips Achieva 1.5 Tesla by
repeating a fast inversion recovery (IR) sequence (Look-Locker sequence , TR = 23ms, TE =
11 ms, EPI factor = 11, flip angle = 30°, FOV = 96 × 96 mm2 matrix = 96 × 96, NSA = 4)
before and during one hour after intravenous co-administration of the MRI blood pool agent
and microbubbles. About 30 acquisitions at different inversion times were performed to
measure the recovery of the longitudinal magnetization, with respiratory synchronization,
leading to an acquisition time of 2 to 3 minutes, depending on the breathing period.
Image processing and data analysis
The images obtained from each Look-Locker measurement were automatically fitted with in-
house developed software written in IDL language (ITT Corporation). To obtain a parametric
map of the T1 values, the temporal evolution of the magnitude of the longitudinal
magnetization was fitted (Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm) for each pixel with the following
equation:
( ) 10
T
t
z ebaMtM−
⋅−⋅= 11-1
Mo corresponded to the longitudinal magnetization at the equilibrium and Mz corresponded to
the longitudinal magnetization in time. The initial values of the parameters a and b were set to
1 and 2 (ideal inversion recovery), respectively, and these parameters were allowed to vary in
the fitting process between 0,5 and 1,5 for a and between 1,5 and 2,5 for b, to account for
potential local variations of the flip angles related to non uniform B1 values. This automatic
process was repeated for each individual Look-Locker measurement. Then, three regions of
interest (ROI) were manually selected by an experienced radiologist in the left, center and
129
right parts of the liver to analyze the evolution of T1 (mean ± standard deviation) as a function
of time. The T1 values obtained were expressed in percentage of the initial T1 of each animal.
Experimental design
The change in distribution of macromolecular MRI contrast agent due to ultrasound and
microbubbles was monitored with the proposed method. For this purpose, animals (n = 12)
were placed in supine position in the MRI scanner with a 4.7 cm in diameter surface receiver
coil taped on the shaved abdomen. A reference T1-map was measured using the Look-Locker
sequence. Next the macromolecular MRI contrast agent (Vistarem) was injected, followed by
a second injection, of the US contrast agent. In one group of rats (n = 5), these microbubbles
were immediately visualized and destroyed with the clinical echograph located near the table
top of the MRI scanner. For microbubble destruction sonications were performed during 2
minutes at a mechanical index (MI) of 1.5 and a frequency of 2 MHz. In the control group (n
= 7), no ultrasound was applied. Measurements of the hepatic T1 values in time were
performed with the Look-Locker technique (see above for details) during 1 hour. To ensure
that the animal remained in the same position before and after sonication, a home made MRI
compatible animal holder was designed. This apparatus could slide horizontally on the table
top to allow sonications within the liver with the non-MR compatible echograph entered in
the Faraday cage. After the 2 minutes sonication, the echograph was removed and the holder
was translated back to its initial position at the magnet center. The total duration required for
injections, sonication and repositioning the animal was approximately 4 minutes. Body
temperature of the animal was continuously monitored with a rectal optical probe (Luxtron®),
since variations of temperature may influence T1 values.
130
Figure 11.1 Timing diagram of performed experiments. First a reference T1 map was
measured using the Look-locker sequence, followed by i.v. injections of Vistarem and
microbubbles. Next ultrasound was applied during 2 minutes for one group of animals.
Finally, T1 maps were acquired continuously during 1 hour.
11.3. Results
Figure 11.2 displays typical results obtained from the fast inversion-recovery imaging
sequence. Image intensities in transverse orientation are displayed as a function of the
inversion times (Figure 11.2a). Figure 11.2b shows typical results of the evolution of the MR
signal in a single pixel located in the liver. The signal intensity was measured for 29
successive inversion times (black dots). The solid line is the result of the fit of these data with
equation 11-1. Parametric maps of the M0 and T1-values are displayed in Figure 11.2c and d
to illustrate the quality of the results.
131
Figure 11.2 Typical results obtained from the fast inversion-recovery imaging sequence. (a)
Image intensities in transverse orientation are displayed as a function of increasing inversion
times. (b) Typical results of the evolution of the MR signal in a single pixel located in the
liver. The signal intensity was measured for 29 successive inversion times (black dots). The
solid line is the result of the fit of these data with equation 11-1. (c) M0 map with ROI used for
temporal analysis. (d) Typical T1-map.
In order to investigate non-cavitation related variation of T1 values on an anesthetized animal
during 1 hour, a first set of experiments (n = 2) was performed without any injections nor
sonications. Negligible variations of T1-value (3%) in individual rats were observed, though
there were small oscillations in body temperature (< 0,5 °C). The T1-values measured in the
different rats were not identical (385 ± 9 ms and 310 ± 15 ms). Therefore, T1 values measured
at different time point were normalized to the initial value (average of 2 to 4 measurements).
The ROI indicated on the T1-map in Figure 11.2c was used for the temporal analysis of T1-
values. Figure 11.3 compares the evolutions in time of the mean T1-value in this ROI for one
rat with sonication (square) and for one rat without sonication (circle). Monitoring of the T1
values was started approximately 4 minutes after the end of sonication. For both experiments,
T1 decreased after injection of MR contrast agent and sonication. Monitoring of the T1 values
after the sonication with the Look-Locker method shows an immediate and slow recovery of
132
the T1 values for both experiments. For both cases, the T1-values did not return to the initial
T1-value 60 minutes after injection of the macromolecular contrast agent.
Figure 11.3 Temporal evolution of mean T1 values for an ultrasound treated rat (square) and
for a control rat (circle)
Figure 11.4 shows the temporal evolution of normalized T1 values at 7, 15 minutes and 60
minutes in the ROI as indicated in Figure 11.2c for the two groups of animals. A clear
difference was observed between the 2 groups, with systematic lower values for the group
with destruction of microbubbles (n = 5) as compared to the control group (n = 7), indicative
of a change of the interaction of the MRI contrast agent with the liver tissue. Seven minutes
after injection of Vistarem the normalized T1 represented 63% (± 6%) of the initial T1 in the
group with microbubbles destruction versus 81% (± 4%) in the control group. This difference
progressively decreased in time but still remained one hour after injection (79% ± 3% vs 90%
5%). A similar behavior was observed for the two ROIs located on the left and right parts of
the liver, respectively. This was expected since the ultrasonic field induced by the probe
(4C1) used for destruction of the Sonovue covered the complete liver of the animals. Body
temperature remained stable during these experiments (mean variation of 1,1 ± 0,7 °C).
133
Figure 11.4 Normalized T1 values for ultrasound treated (square) and non-ultrasound treated
control rats (circle) at t = 7, 15 and 60 minutes after Vistarem and microbubble injection.
11.4. Discussion
The proposed method allows for non invasive imaging of the time course of the change in the
interaction between a blood pool MR contrast agent and the surrounding hepatic tissue. For
this purpose, one group of animals was sonicated with a high mechanical index after injection
of MR contrast agent and microbubbles in order to evoke cavitation mediated extravasation of
the MR contrast agent. A control group was also injected with MR contrast agent and
microbubbles, but was not sonicated. After injections and in one case sonication, quantitative
evolution of the longitudinal relaxation time was measured dynamically in vivo in rats with
the help of a fast inversion-recovery sequence.
Measurements performed on the control group showed a slow recovery of the T1 values after
injection of Vistarem, with an elimination time in the range of 1 hour. This value corresponds
to invasive blood measurements reported in the literature [28].
In addition, the difference between T1 values in the two groups of animals remained
significantly different after one hour. With respect to this time scale, the temporal resolution
of the imaging sequence (about 2 minutes) was considered sufficient for reasonable sampling
134
of the temporal evolution of the redistribution of the macrogadolinium. The observed
differences in T1 between the two groups clearly demonstrate a transient change of the
interaction between the macrogadolinium and the hepatic tissue related to cavitation.
However, the precise local distribution of the macrogadolinium was not investigated in the
present study, since histological visualization of the selected reporter macromolecule was not
possible. Quantification would have been possible with the help of mass spectroscopy [29].
However, this would require a perfusion of the ex vivo livers to wash out the remaining
Vistarem in the vasculature. In addition, this technique is limited by local sampling of the
tissue and was not compatible with temporal monitoring due to its invasive nature. Recent
developments of multi-modality contrast agents, such as magnetofluorescent nanoparticles
[30], offer possibilities to correlate in vivo MR data with histological or in vivo optical
analysis. Developments of multi-modality probes and optical imaging devices (fluorescence
tomography, Cell~vizio™ (Mauna Kea Technolgies)) dedicated to small animal should help
in analyzing the nature of the influence of cavitation effect for increased local drug delivery.
The analysis of the precise mechanisms responsible for redistribution of the macrogadolinium
between tissue and vasculature was out of the scope of the present work. The selected reporter
macromolecule does not strictly mimic a real drug nor a nano drug carrier. However, the
proposed method may remain applicable in the presence of such molecules/vehicles and
allows for online visualization of the influence of cavitation on the change of interaction
between hepatic tissue and Vistarem.
In the present work, only two different sonication conditions were compared (with and
without cavitation), but no optimization of the ultrasound parameters was performed. In
addition, since the US device was not MR compatible, no direct monitoring of the changes
during sonication could be performed. This limitation could be overcome by the use of
dedicated US imaging device, as recently reported [31]. Further, no spatial differences were
observed between the different parts of the liver due to the size of the US transducer. In the
perspective of local drug delivery, the precise control of the localization of the cavitation
could be performed by the use of a MR compatible focused ultrasound transducer [32]. The
dimensions of the focal beam are typically a few millimeters, depending on the transducer
design and operating frequency. Therefore, the spatial resolution achieved with the Look-
Locker sequence (1 mm2) should allow for direct visualization of the changes of the T1 values
during focused ultrasound sonications. However, these apparatus do not usually include
ultrasonic imaging capabilities and therefore do not allow for a direct visualization of
135
microbubbles transient passage in the targeted organ, as in our case. The absence of
monitoring of the T1 changes during sonication was not considered problematic in the present
work, since it lasted less than 4 minutes whereas the time course of the observed phenomenon
was about 1 hour.
The proposed monitoring method may help in optimizing the sonication protocol (amplitude,
pulse repetition frequency, sonication duration and microbubble concentration), as a function
of the targeted organ, since the local quantity of US contrast agent is perfusion dependent.
Although the data shown here were obtained on the liver, this method may be applied to any
soft tissue that can be imaged with MRI.
In the present work, the imaging devices and the injected molecules were clinically approved.
However, Sonovue has received the agreement for clinical usage only as a diagnostic contrast
agent, but not for the purpose of increased cavitational purposes. The proposed method may
help in direct visualization of the enhanced drug delivery by cavitation in humans without
inducing unwanted irreversible damages.
11.5. References
[1] Tredan O, Galmarini CM, Patel K, Tannock IF. Drug resistance and the solid tumor
microenvironment. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99(19):1441-1454.
[2] Bao S, Thrall BD, Miller DL. Transfection of a reporter plasmid into cultured cells by
sonoporation in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997;23(6):953-959.
[3] Greenleaf WJ, Bolander ME, Sarkar G, Goldring MB, Greenleaf JF. Artificial
cavitation nuclei significantly enhance acoustically induced cell transfection.
Ultrasound Med Biol 1998;24(4):587-595.
[4] Lawrie A, Brisken AF, Francis SE, Tayler DI, Chamberlain J, Crossman DC,
Cumberland DC, Newman CM. Ultrasound enhances reporter gene expression after
transfection of vascular cells in vitro. Circulation 1999;99(20):2617-2620.
[5] Lu QL, Liang HD, Partridge T, Blomley MJ. Microbubble ultrasound improves the
efficiency of gene transduction in skeletal muscle in vivo with reduced tissue damage.
Gene Ther 2003;10(5):396-405.
[6] Taniyama Y, Tachibana K, Hiraoka K, Aoki M, Yamamoto S, Matsumoto K,
Nakamura T, Ogihara T, Kaneda Y, Morishita R. Development of safe and efficient
novel nonviral gene transfer using ultrasound: enhancement of transfection efficiency
of naked plasmid DNA in skeletal muscle. Gene Ther 2002;9(6):372-380.
136
[7] Price RJ, Skyba DM, Kaul S, Skalak TC. Delivery of colloidal particles and red blood
cells to tissue through microvessel ruptures created by targeted microbubble
destruction with ultrasound. Circulation 1998;98(13):1264-1267.
[8] Song J, Chappell JC, Qi M, VanGieson EJ, Kaul S, Price RJ. Influence of injection
site, microvascular pressure and ultrasound variables on microbubble-mediated
delivery of microspheres to muscle. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39(4):726-731.
[9] Skyba DM, Price RJ, Linka AZ, Skalak TC, Kaul S. Direct in vivo visualization of
intravascular destruction of microbubbles by ultrasound and its local effects on tissue.
Circulation 1998;98(4):290-293.
[10] Dalecki D, Child SZ, Raeman CH, Cox C, Carstensen EL. Ultrasonically induced lung
hemorrhage in young swine. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997;23(5):777-781.
[11] Feril LB, Jr., Kondo T, Zhao QL, Ogawa R, Tachibana K, Kudo N, Fujimoto S,
Nakamura S. Enhancement of ultrasound-induced apoptosis and cell lysis by echo-
contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29(2):331-337.
[12] Dalecki D, Raeman CH, Child SZ, Cox C, Francis CW, Meltzer RS, Carstensen EL.
Hemolysis in vivo from exposure to pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol
1997;23(2):307-313.
[13] Cline HE, Hynynen K, Watkins RD, Adams WJ, Schenck JF, Ettinger RH, Freund
WR, Vetro JP, Jolesz FA. Focused US system for MR imaging-guided tumor ablation.
Radiology 1995;194(3):731-737.
[14] Deckers R, Rome C, Moonen CT. The role of ultrasound and magnetic resonance in
local drug delivery. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27(2):400-409.
[15] Frenkel V. Ultrasound mediated delivery of drugs and genes to solid tumors. Adv
Drug Deliv Rev 2008;60(10):1193-1208.
[16] Taniyama Y, Tachibana K, Hiraoka K, Namba T, Yamasaki K, Hashiya N, Aoki M,
Ogihara T, Yasufumi K, Morishita R. Local delivery of plasmid DNA into rat carotid
artery using ultrasound. Circulation 2002;105(10):1233-1239.
[17] Rahim A, Taylor SL, Bush NL, ter Haar GR, Bamber JC, Porter CD. Physical
parameters affecting ultrasound/microbubble-mediated gene delivery efficiency in
vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006;32(8):1269-1279.
[18] Zarnitsyn VG, Prausnitz MR. Physical parameters influencing optimization of
ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004;30(4):527-538.
137
[19] Hallow DM, Mahajan AD, Prausnitz MR. Ultrasonically targeted delivery into
endothelial and smooth muscle cells in ex vivo arteries. J Control Release
2007;118(3):285-293.
[20] Larkin JO, Casey GD, Tangney M, Cashman J, Collins CG, Soden DM, O'Sullivan
GC. Effective tumor treatment using optimized ultrasound-mediated delivery of
bleomycin. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008;34(3):406-413.
[21] Iwanaga K, Tominaga K, Yamamoto K, Habu M, Maeda H, Akifusa S, Tsujisawa T,
Okinaga T, Fukuda J, Nishihara T. Local delivery system of cytotoxic agents to
tumors by focused sonoporation. Cancer Gene Ther 2007;14(4):354-363.
[22] Bekeredjian R, Kroll RD, Fein E, Tinkov S, Coester C, Winter G, Katus HA, Kulaksiz
H. Ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction increases capillary permeability in
hepatomas. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007;33(10):1592-1598.
[23] Treat LH, McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, Zhang Y, Tam K, Hynynen K. Targeted
delivery of doxorubicin to the rat brain at therapeutic levels using MRI-guided focused
ultrasound. Int J Cancer 2007;121(4):901-907.
[24] Port M, Corot C, Raynal I, Idee JM, Dencausse A, Lancelot E, Meyer D, Bonnemain
B, Lautrou J. Physicochemical and biological evaluation of P792, a rapid-clearance
blood-pool agent for magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2001;36(8):445-454.
[25] Greis C. Technology overview: SonoVue (Bracco, Milan). Eur Radiol 2004;14 Suppl
8:P11-15.
[26] Morel DR, Schwieger I, Hohn L, Terrettaz J, Llull JB, Cornioley YA, Schneider M.
Human pharmacokinetics and safety evaluation of SonoVue, a new contrast agent for
ultrasound imaging. Invest Radiol 2000;35(1):80-85.
[27] Port M, Corot C, Rousseaux O, Raynal I, Devoldere L, Idee JM, Dencausse A, Le
Greneur S, Simonot C, Meyer D. P792: a rapid clearance blood pool agent for
magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary results. Magma 2001;12(2-3):121-127.
[28] Corot C, Violas X, Robert P, Gagneur G, Port M. Comparison of different types of
blood pool agents (P792, MS325, USPIO) in a rabbit MR angiography-like protocol.
Invest Radiol 2003;38(6):311-319.
[29] Frame EM, Uzgiris EE. Gadolinium determination in tissue samples by inductively
coupled plasma mass spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission
spectrometry in evaluation of the action of magnetic resonance imaging contrast
agents. Analyst 1998;123(4):675-679.
138
[30] Sosnovik DE, Nahrendorf M, Deliolanis N, Novikov M, Aikawa E, Josephson L,
Rosenzweig A, Weissleder R, Ntziachristos V. Fluorescence tomography and
magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial macrophage infiltration in infarcted
myocardium in vivo. Circulation 2007;115(11):1384-1391.
[31] Curiel L, Chopra R, Hynynen K. Progress in multimodality imaging: truly
simultaneous ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging
2007;26(12):1740-1746.
[32] McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, Hynynen K. Effects of acoustic parameters and
ultrasound contrast agent dose on focused-ultrasound induced blood-brain barrier
disruption. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008;34(6):930-937.
141
Summary
This thesis describes the use of molecular imaging technologies for molecular therapy
applications such as local gene activation and local drug delivery. Molecular imaging
techniques can be used for early detection and characterization of diseases, guidance of
therapy and quantification of induced therapeutic effect. This thesis starts with an introduction
of the main techniques used for research in this work. In the second part feasibility studies are
described to investigate the use of MRI guided HIFU in combination with a heat sensitive
promoter to achieve spatial and temporal control of transgene expression. Bioluminescence
imaging allowed for non-invasive monitoring of local transgene activation. Local deposition
of energy with ultrasound may also facilitate the delivery of drugs to areas in need of therapy.
Molecular imaging techniques allow for real-time monitoring of the fate of the drugs. This
research is described in the third part.
Part I: Introduction of the main techniques used
In Chapter 1 the interaction of ultrasound with tissue is described. In Chapter 3 the use of
MRI thermometry for controlling local hyperthermia is described. The different optical
imaging techniques for monitoring local gene activation and drug delivery are explained in
Chapter 4.
Part II : Spatio-temporal control of gene activation
Local hyperthermia in combination with a heat sensitive heat shock protein (Hsp) promoter
allows for spatio-temporal control of transgene expression. The time course and location of
transgene expressiom is assessed with help of an optical reporter gene (firefly luciferase)
placed under control of the Hsp promoter. Hsp promoters, particularly Hsp70 promoters, have
a couple of characteristics that make them very suitable for gene therapy. The in vitro
characterization of the Hsp70 promoter in Chapter 7 showed that the Hsp70 promoter has a
low basal activity and can attain high heat-induced activity, up to 53 fold compared to basal
activity. Furthermore, it was shown that the magnitude of promoter activity can be modulated
by temperature and duration of hyperthermia. Promoter activity was assessed with respect to
different temperatures and durations of hyperthermia. It was demonstrated that the promoter
activity followed an Arrhenius relationship. Temperature increase of 1º C with a constant
exposure time resulted in a 2-fold increase of luciferase activity. A similar increase in
luciferase activity was observed after doubling the exposure time at constant temperature.
142
In Chapter 8 a transgenic mouse model is used to evaluate the in vivo kinetics of the Hsp70
promoter activity with respect to temperature and duration of hyperthermia. This transgenic
mouse model, NLF-1, contains a transgene that allows firefly luciferase expression under the
control of the Hsp70 promoter. The maximal luciferase activity was found 4 hours after
heating, independently of the applied heating protocol. It was demonstrated that the in vivo
promoter activity also followed an Arrhenius relationship. The response of the promoter
activity to a temperature increase of 1º C or a doubling of the exposure time was similar in
vivo and in vitro. In the clinical environment multiple sequential heatings might be necessary
in order to obtain a prolonged treatment, due to the transient character of the promoter. The in
vivo mouse model allowed investigating the time course of the promoter activity after
multiple sequential heatings. A second heating resulted in significant increase of luciferase
activity, whereas after a third heating the emission returned to original light emission levels.
The origin of varying luciferase activity after multiple sequential heatings is unknown.
In Chapter 9 MRI guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) and Bioluminescence
Imaging (BLI) were used in the transgenic NLF-1 mouse to show a high similarity between
the local temperature distribution in vivo and the region emitting light. Control of transgene
expression was achieved by automatic adjustment of the HIFU power based on continuous
MRI thermometry to force the temperature to follow a predefined temperature evolution. The
good spatial correspondence between increased temperature and gene expression was
demonstrated by comparing MRI temperature maps and bioluminescence images. BLI
demonstrated also to be a reliable method for analyzing the kinetics of gene activation. Mild
heating protocols (i.e. 2 minutes at 43°C) lead to significant amplification of gene expression
without inducing tissue damage. However, increasing the duration of the hyperthermia
resulted in an increase of induced damage in the leg muscles. This illustrates the importance
of the choice of the heating conditions in vivo to observe sufficient induction of expression
avoiding tissue damage. Furthermore, this justifies the fundamental importance of a precise,
non-invasive and quantitative temperature measurement and control system provided by the
combination of MRI thermometry and HIFU heating.
Part III: Local drug delivery
In Chapter 10 the role of ultrasound and molecular imaging technologies in local drug
delivery are explained. The interaction of ultrasound with tissue may improve the deposition
of drug (carriers) in the region in need of therapy. Hyperthermia, cavitation and radiation
force are the underlying physical mechanism that create bio-effects favorable for drug
143
delivery. The in vivo distribution and metabolism of a drug and its effect on a living system
can be monitored with a large spectrum of non-invasive imaging technologies. Each
technique has specific advantages and limitations for monitoring drug delivery. Therefore, the
use of hybrid imaging systems is promising.
In Chapter 11 a method is presented for monitoring in vivo with MRI the changes of
distribution of a reporter macromolecule in hepatic tissue induced by cavitation. The temporal
and spatial resolution of MRI was sufficient to follow transient changes in T1 values of
hepatic tissue. Injection of macromolecular contrast agent and microbubbles followed by
ultrasound resulted in lower T1 values as compared to the control experiment without
ultrasound. The proposed method may help in direct visualization of the enhanced drug
delivery by cavitation and in optimizing the sonication protocol for delivery.
Key words: MRI, focused ultrasound, local transgene activation, optical imaging, local drug
delivery
145
Perspectives
This study showed the opportunities of the non-invasive HIFU technique for controlling, via
local hyperthermia, the location and level of transgene activation. MRI thermometry was
shown to be essential for monitoring the local temperature distribution and controlling HIFU
power output. The next step will be the application of spatio-temporal activation under control
MR guided HIFU of a therapeutic gene in a disease model. The therapeutic gene HSV-tk
would be a good first candidate, because the principle of activating HSV-tk with
hyperthermia, but without HIFU, has already been demonstrated by other groups.
The local deposition of thermal energy with HIFU may not only be useful in gene therapy, but
also in cell-based therapies. In cell-based therapies stem cells are induced to differentiate into
the specific cell type required to repair damaged or destroyed cells or tissues. Stem cells,
directed to differentiate into specific cell types, offer the possibility of a renewable source of
replacement cells and tissues to treat diseases including Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases,
spinal cord injury, stroke, burns, heart disease, diabetes, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid
arthritis. However, the efficacy of stem cell therapies depends on the introduced cells arriving
where they are needed and differentiating into specific cell types needed for replacing or
rejuvenating damaged cells. MRI guided HIFU may play an important role in the spatio-
temporal control of inducing stem cell differentiation and thereby improve the efficacy and
safety of cell-based therapies.
The perspectives of MR guided HIFU in combination with molecular imaging techniques for
local drug delivery seems to be extraordinary. The large choice in drug carriers, targeting
methods and applications of ultrasound allow the development of drug delivery methods for
each individual case, and thus lead to drastically altered pharmacokinetics and
pharmacodistribution. The drug delivery methods that will enter the clinic first may be based
on combinations of existing techniques and formulations already approved for clinical use.
For example doxorubicin filled liposomes (Doxil) that are passively targeted to tumor site
where therapeutic ultrasound improves the release of the drug out of the carrier and reduces
the physiological barriers. Active targeting of acoustic active carriers such as microbubbles to
diseased sites in combination with HIFU may further improve the efficacy of the treatment
and lower the systemic toxicity.
Furthermore, the non-invasive imaging of drug distribution can help to quantify delivery and
allow the prediction of treatment efficacy based on the distribution and quantity of the
146
delivered drug. The large library of reporter molecules developed for molecular imaging
applications using different imaging modalities may also be exploited for drug delivery
monitoring. However, such molecular image probes are in general based on covalent binding
to the molecule of interest which is, at present, a strategy not envisioned for drug delivery
(except with regard to PET labelled drugs). Co-injection of image probes with similar in vivo
behaviour as the drug allows for monitoring drug delivery without changing the properties of
the drug. Further, the development of multi-modality imaging methods is promising because
it allows simultaneous monitoring of the drug carrier as well as the drug itself.
147
Résumé
Cette thèse décrit l’utilisation des techniques d’imagerie moléculaire pour des thérapies
moléculaires telles que l’activation génique locale ou le dépôt local de médicaments. Les
techniques d’imagerie moléculaire peuvent être utilisées pour une détection et une
caractérisation précoce de maladies, le guidage d’une thérapie, et la quantification des effets
thérapeutiques induits par un traitement. Cette thèse commence avec une introduction des
principales techniques utilisées dans ce travail. Dans la seconde partie de ce manuscrit, une
étude de faisabilité a été menée pour mettre en évidence le rôle des ultrasons focalisés guidés
par IRM combinés à un promoteur thermosensible pour permettre le contrôle spatio-temporel
d’une expression transgène. L’imagerie par bioluminescence permet un contrôle non-invasif
de l’expression transgène. Le dépôt local d’énergie avec les ultrasons peut aussi faciliter la
libération de molécules thérapeutiques dans des régions nécessitant un traitement. Les
techniques d’imagerie moléculaire permettent le monitorage temps réel du suivi du
médicament. Ce point est abordé dans la troisième partie de cette thèse. Ce manuscrit
commence par un état de l’art des principales techniques utilisées dans cette thématique de
recherche.
Partie I: Introduction des principales techniques utilisées
Dans le chapitre 2, la description de l’interaction entre les ultrasons et les tissus est faite. Dans
le chapitre 3, le rôle de la thermométrie par IRM dans le contrôle d’une hyperthermie locale
est explicité. Les différentes techniques d’imagerie optique permettant un monitorage en ligne
d’une activation génique et le monitorage en ligne d’un dépôt local de médicament sont
détaillées dans le chapitre 4.
Partie II: Contrôle spatio-temporel de l’activation génique
La combinaison de l’hyperthermie locale avec un promoteur thermosensible (Hsp) permet un
contrôle spatio-temporel de l’expression transgène. La cinétique et la localisation de
l’expression transgène est faite à l’aide d’un gène optique reporter (généralement la
luciférase) placé sous contrôle d’un promoteur Hsp. Les promoteurs Hsp, particulièrement
Hsp70, ont des caractéristiques appropriées pour la thérapie génique. La caractérisation in
vitro du promoteur Hsp70 dans le chapitre 7 montre que ce promoteur comporte une activité
de base faible et peut atteindre une activité élevée sous l’effet de la chaleur, avec une
amélioration d’un facteur 53 par rapport à l’activité normale. De plus, il a été montré que
148
l’amplitude de l’activité du promoteur peut être modulée grâce à la température appliquée et
la durée effective de l’hyperthermie. L’activité du promoteur a été testée pour différentes
températures et durées de chauffage. Il a été montré que l’activité du promoteur suit une
relation d’Arrhenius. Une augmentation de température de 1°C avec un temps d’exposition
constant résulte dans une augmentation d’un facteur 2 de l’activité de la luciférase. Une
amélioration similaire a été observée si l’on double le temps de chauffage pour une
température constante.
Dans le chapitre 8, un modèle de souris transgénique est utilise pour évaluer la cinétique in
vivo de l’activité du promoteur Hsp70 en fonction de la température et de la durée d’une
hyperthermie. Ce modèle de souris transgénique, NLF-1, possède un transgène qui permet
l’expression de la luciférase sous le contrôle du promoteur Hsp70. Le pic maximal d’activité
de la luciférase a été trouvé 4 heures après chauffage, indépendamment du protocole
d’hyperthermie utilisé. Il a été démontré que l’activité du promoteur in vivo suit également
une relation d’Arrhenius. La réponse du promoteur à une augmentation de temperature de 1°C
ou à un temps de chauffage doublé est similaire pour une expérience in vivo et pour une
expérience in vitro. Dans le cas d’applications cliniques, plusieurs séquences de chauffage
peuvent être nécessaires pour obtenir un traitement efficace ceci à cause du caractère
transitoire du promoteur. Le modèle de souris in vivo permet l’étude de l’activité du
promoteur après plusieurs séquences d’hyperthermie. Une seconde hyperthermie résulte dans
une amélioration significative de l’activité de la luciférase, alors qu’après un troisième
chauffage, l’émission lumineuse revient aux niveaux d’émissions lumineuses originaux.
L’origine de cette variation d’activité de la luciférase après plusieurs chauffages consécutifs
est inconnue.
Dans le chapitre 9, les ultrasons focalisés par IRM (MRgHIFU) et l’imagerie par
bioluminescence (BLI) sont utilisés sur une souris transgénique NLF-1 pour montrer la
correspondance entre une élévation locale de température in vivo et une émission locale de
lumière. Le contrôle de l’expression transgène a été effectué par un ajustement automatique
de la puissance des ultrasons basé sur le monitorage en ligne de la température par IRM afin
de forcer la température à suivre une consigne d’évolution prédéfinie. La correspondance
spatiale entre une élévation de température et l’expression du gène a été démontrée en
comparant les cartes de températures avec les images de bioluminescences. Il a aussi été
démontré que les BLI peuvent être un outil fiable pour analyser la cinétique de l’activation
d’un gène. Des protocoles d’hyperthermie légers (i.e. 2 minutes à 43°C) produisent des
149
amplifications significatives de l’expression d’un gène sans pour autant induire des
dommages sur les tissus environnant. Malgré tout, l’augmentation de la durée de
l’hyperthermie résulte dans une augmentation des dommages tissulaires induit dans les
muscles. Ce point illustre l’importance du choix des paramètres de chauffage in vivo
permettant l’observation de l’expression du gène en évitant les dommages tissulaires. De plus,
cela justifie le rôle fondamentale de la méthode précise, non-invasive et quantitative de
mesure de température fournit par la combinaison de la thermométrie par IRM et d’une
hyperthermie appliquée à l’aide des ultrasons focalisés.
Partie III: Dépôt local de médicaments
Dans le chapitre 10, le rôle des ultrasons et des techniques d’imagerie moléculaire dans le
dépôt local de médicaments est expliqué. L’interaction des ultrasons avec les tissus peut
améliorer le dépôt de principes thérapeutiques dans une région nécessitant un traitement.
L’hyperthermie, la cavitation et la force rayonnant sont les mécanismes physiques sous-
jacents créant des effets biologiques favorables au dépôt de médicament. La distribution et le
métabolisme in vivo d’un médicament et ses effets sur un système vivant peut être monitorée
par un large spectre de techniques d’imagerie non-invasives. Chaque technique présente des
avantages et des limitations spécifiques dans le monitorage du dépôt de médicament.
L’utilisation de systèmes d’imagerie hybrides est prometteuse.
Dans le chapitre 11 la méthode présentée permet le monitorage in vivo par IRM des
changements de distribution par cavitation d’une macromolécule reporter dans un tissu
hépatique. La résolution spatiale et temporelle de l’IRM est suffisante pour suivre les
changements transitoires des valeurs de T1 du tissu hépatique. L’injection d’un agent de
contraste macromoléculaire et de microbulles suivie d’un traitement ultrasonore résulte en des
valeurs de T1 plus faible comparé à l’expérience de contrôle sans ultrasons. La méthode
proposée peut être utile pour la visualisation directe de l’effet du dépôt de médicament par
cavitation en optimisant le protocole de sonication pour la libération des principes
thérapeutiques.
Mots-clés: IRM, ultrasons focalisés, l’activation locale transgénique, imagerie optique, le
dépôt local de médicaments
151
Perspectives
Cette étude montre les opportunités offertes par les techniques non-invasives d’ultrasons
focalisés pour contrôler, via l’hyperthermie locale, le lieu et le niveau d’une activation
transgène. La thermométrie par IRM est un élément essentiel dans le monitorage d’une
distribution locale de température et dans l’asservissement de la puissance de la sonde HIFU.
La prochaine étape sera l’application d’une activation spatio-temporelle contrôlée par
MRgHIFU d’un gène thérapeutique sur un modèle de maladie. Le gène thérapeutique HSV-tk
pourrait être un bon candidat pour débuter étant donné que le principe d’activation du gène
HSV-tk par hyperthermie (mais sans ultrasons focalisés) a déjà été démontré par d’autres
groupes de recherche.
Le dépôt local d’énergie thermique avec les ultrasons focalisés peut non seulement être utile
dans la thérapie génique, mais aussi dans les thérapies cellulaires. Dans les thérapies
cellulaires, les cellules souches sont destinées à se différencier dans les types de cellules
spécifiques requis pour réparer les cellules ou les tissus détruits ou endommagés. Les cellules
souches offrent la possibilité d’avoir une source de cellules et de tissus de remplacement afin
de traiter des maladies comme la maladie de Parkinson, d’Alzheimer, des blessures de la
moelle épinière, des caillots sanguins, des brulures, des maladies du cœur, du diabète, et de
l’arthrite rhumatoïde. L’efficacité des thérapies basées sur les cellules souches repose sur le
fait que les cellules introduites doivent arriver à l’endroit où les cellules endommagées ont
besoin d’être réparées et aussi sur le fait qu’elles doivent se différencier dans les bons types
cellulaires. Les ultrasons focalisés guidés par IRM peuvent jouer un rôle important dans le
contrôle spatio-temporel et le déclenchement de la différenciation et donc améliorer
l’efficacité et la sécurité des thérapies cellulaires.
Les perspectives liées à l’utilisation des ultrasons focalisés guides par IRM combinés avec les
techniques d’imagerie moléculaire semblent être extraordinaire. Le large choix dans les
transporteurs de médicaments, les méthodes de ciblage, et les applications d’ultrasons permet
le développement de méthodes de dépôt de médicaments spécifiques à chaque cas rencontré,
et conduit à changer considérablement les cinétiques et les modes de distributions
pharmacologiques. La méthode de dépôt de médicament qui sera utilisée dans un premier
temps pourra être basée sur la combinaison de techniques existantes et de formulations déjà
approuvées pour les pratiques cliniques. On peut citer par exemple, l’utilisation de liposomes
porteurs de doxorubicine (Doxil) ciblés passivement sur le lieu d’une tumeur et où
152
l’utilisation des ultrasons améliore la libération du principe thérapeutique et réduit l’efficacité
des barrières physiologiques permettant ainsi un traitement plus efficace. Un ciblage actif du
lieu à traiter de transporteurs sensibles aux ondes ultrasonores tels que les microbulles,
combiné aux ultrasons focalisés peut améliorer l’efficacité du traitement et réduire la toxicité
systémique.
De plus, l’imagerie non-invasive de la distribution de médicament peut aider à quantifier la
déposition du principe thérapeutique et permet la prédiction de l’efficacité du traitement à
partir de la distribution et de la quantité de médicament délivrée. La grande variété de
molécules reporters développées pour l’imagerie moléculaire utilisant différentes modalités
d’imagerie peut aussi être exploitée pour monitorer le dépôt local de médicament. En
revanche, ces molécules reporters sont en général basées sur un couplage covalent avec la
molécule thérapeutique, ce qui à l’heure actuelle n’est pas la stratégie souhaitée à long terme
pour la déposition locale de médicament (excepté pour les médicaments associés à la TEP).
L’injection simultanée de molécules reporters ayant des comportements in vivo similaires aux
médicaments utilisés permet le suivi de la libération du principe thérapeutique sans en
changer les propriétés. Le développement de l’imagerie multi-modalité est prometteur car il
permet le suivi simultané du transporteur de médicament et du médicament lui-même.
155
Word of thanks
Time flies when you are having fun. I still remember the day that I took the train from
Maastricht in the direction of Bordeaux like it was yesterday. Five minutes after leaving the
railway station we crossed the border with Belgium and from that point on the people that
entered the train spoke a language I didn't understand: French. My big adventure had started!
First I would like to thank the members of the jury for reading my thesis in such detail and
making critical comments on it. Mickaël Tanter and Bertand Tavitian, I was honored to have
you as my ‘rapporteurs’ and thank you for coming to Bordeaux just before Christmas. Pierre
Voisin, Alain Brisson, Wilbert Bartels and Chrit Moonen, thank you for taking place in my
jury as ‘examinateur’ and making my jury even more multi-disciplinary.
Chrit, of course I don’t want to thank you only for being in my jury, but mainly for giving me
the opportunity to do my PhD thesis in your lab. I think we have discussed a lot of things
(science, politics, sports, wine, the French system) in a lot of languages (French, English,
Dutch and last but not least Limburgs). I really enjoyed our morning-coffee discussions and I
am happy that we can continue to do this in Utrecht.
During my thesis Chrit (and sometimes even I) had the most beautiful ideas for new research.
Luckily Franck and Bruno you were also in the lab to put these beautiful ideas in a more
down-to-earth perspective and to help me on a day-to-day basis to realize my objectives.
Mario, although we didn’t work on the same research projects, our routes crossed often for
example during the morning-coffees and when my computer didn’t work. Furthermore, I
would like to thank you for giving me a place to stay during the first weeks in Bordeaux and
of course for supporting my IKEA addiction when I found an apartment.
Greg, pour montrer quel bon prof de français tu es, je te remercie en français. C’est toi qui
m’a appris les mots importants pour une conversation de haut niveau : ‘hi
coquine…remorque…femme à lunette, femme à…’. Tu étais mon collègue, mais surtout mon
pote et j’espère qu’on va avoir encore beaucoup de moments où on peut parler de foot, des
filles et de science.
Yasmina, heureusement tu étais là, avec ta touche féminin pour corriger notre instinct animal
et ta compagnie joyeuse au boulot et dans les sortis.
156
Nora, Pierre-Yves, Christelle, Anna and Coralie I enjoyed working with you on the different
projects. Good luck with becoming radiologist, your thesis, your post-doc and your
‘concours’.
Josette, heureusement tu n’es pas partie en retraite avant la fin de ma thèse. Je te remercie de
m’avoir expliqué plein choses en biologie, et surtout de ta patience vu mon niveau de français
(au début).
Pierre and Hélène thank you for taking care of all my sweet little mice. Without them and thus
without you there wouldn’t have been a thesis.
Charles, thank you for always having the correct answers to all my ultrasound related
questions. I hope you will continue doing this for me in Utrecht.
Colette, Marie-France, Matthieu, Silke, Xenia, Baudouin, Mathilde, Sebastien, Bixente,
Gwenaelle, Isabelle, Olivier, Marion, Christophe, Hugues, Hervé and Nicolas I enjoyed
working in the same lab. J’espère que vous n’êtes pas trop triste qu’il y a plus un néerlandais
qui tartine ses sandwiches dans la cuisine?
Luis, Iulius, Claire, Cedric, Marianne, Philippe, Vincent, Sander, Omer, Charles and Thibault
you are, just like me, old members of the IMF lab. Be proud of it and good luck in your
career!
En tout cas je ne vais pas oublier mon séjour en France car j’ai emmené un grand souvenir
aux Pays-Bas. Sophie, merci de m’avoir soutenu pendant ma dernière année de thèse et d’être
venu avec moi à Utrecht.
En natuurlijk, pap en mam, dank jullie wel voor jullie onvoorwaardelijke steun. Jullie
luisterend oor en goede adviezen tijdens de vele telefoongesprekken waren een prima
klankbord voor alle frustaties en blijdschappen die gepaard gaan met een promotie. Dat er nu
een mooi boekje ligt en dat ik nu de mensen aan de andere kant van de grens van Maastricht
ook versta is ook zeker aan jullie te danken.
157
List of publications
Papers
Frulio N, Trillaud H, Deckers R, Lepreux S, Corot C, Moonen C and Quesson B, MRI
Monitoring of the Inflence of Microbubbles Destruction by Ultrasound for Local Delivery of
a Macromolecular MRI Contrast Agent in the Rat Liver. (Ready for submission)
Deckers R, Quesson B, Arsaut J, Eimer S, Couillaud F and Moonen C, Non-invasive spatio-
temporal control of gene expression . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 106(4), 1175-1180 (2009)
Deckers R, Rome C, and Moonen C, The role of ultrasound and magnetic resonance in local
drug delivery. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 27, 400-409 (2008)
Peer-reviewed abstracts
Deckers R, Couillaud F, Quesson B, Eimer S and Moonen C, Local Control of Transgene
Expression Using MRI Guided HIFU on a Transgenic Mouse. “World Molecular Imaging
Congress, Nice, France”, (2008)
Frulio N, Trillaud H, Deckers R, Lepreux S, Eker O, Corot C, Moonen C and Quesson B,
MRI Monitoring of the Inflence of Microbubbles Destruction by Ultrasound for Local
Delivery of a Macromolecular MRI Contrast Agent in the Rat Liver. “World Molecular
Imaging Congress, Nice, France”, (2008)
Frulio N, Trillaud H, Eker O, Deckers R, Lepreux S, Laurent C, Corot C, Moonen C and
Quesson B, MRI Monitoring of the Influence of US Contrast Agent Destruction for Local
Delivery of a MRI Blood Pool Contrast Agent in the Rat Liver. “ISMRM, 16th scientific
meeting and exhibition, Toronto, Canada”, (2008)
158
Deckers R, Quesson B, Couillaud F and Moonen C, Temporal and spatial control of gene
expression in transgenic mice: a combination of MR-guided HIFU and bioluminescence.
“AMI/SMI Joint Molecular Imaging Conference, Providence, Rhode Island, USA”, (2007)
Deckers R, Quesson B, Rome C, Couillaud F and Moonen C, Non-invasive spatial control of
gene activation by local heating with focused ultrasound under MRI temperature guidance.
“ISMRM, 15th scientific meeting and exhibition, Berlin, Germany”, (2007)
Deckers R, Quesson B, Rome C, Couillaud F and Moonen C, Bioluminescence imaging of
local transgenic expression induced by heat in mice. “First International Conference of the
European Society for Molecular Imaging (ESMI), Paris, France”, (2006)