they said it wasnt like chernobyl and they were wrong

4
They said it wasn't like Chernobyl and they were wrong The Money Party March 25, 2011 http://www.themoneyparty.org/main/?p=1519  Michael Collins According to an international scientific group monitoring radiation around the world, the Fukushima reactors are emitting nuclear toxins at levels approaching those seen in the "aftermath" of Chernobyl. The Chernobyl disaster began with an explosion, Fukushima is a smoldering cauldron of toxins. Chernobyl had 180 tonnes of nuclear fuel on site. Fukushima has 1700 tonnes of nuclear fuel on site. (Image ) This isn't the beginning of the end , as hoped. It's looking like the end of the beginning. CounterPunch ran an interview wit Japanese nuclear industry author Hiroshe Takashi just yesterday in which the author lamented the poor reporting of the tragedy in the Japanese press: "Really, they talk this nonsense, trying to reassure everyone, trying to avoid panic. What we need now is a proper panic. Because the situation has come to the point where the danger is real." Hiroshe Takashi, March 22 Just two days later, the "proper panic" is on its way. The Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics of Vienna, Austria has a world wide monitoring system set up to monitor the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. They are well positioned to monitor the effects of the Fukishima disaster. The group told New Scientist that: Japan's damaged nuclear plant in Fukushima has been emitting radioactive iodine and cesium at levels approaching those seen in the aftermath of the  Chernobyl accident in 1986. Austrian researchers have used a worldwide network of radiation detectors – designed to spot clandestine nuclear bomb tests – to show that iodine-131 is being released at daily levels 73 per cent of those seen after the 1986 disaster. The daily amount of caesium-137 released from Fukushima Daiichi

Upload: michael-collins

Post on 08-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: They Said It Wasnt Like Chernobyl and They Were Wrong

8/7/2019 They Said It Wasnt Like Chernobyl and They Were Wrong

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/they-said-it-wasnt-like-chernobyl-and-they-were-wrong 1/4

They said it wasn't like Chernobyl and they werewrong

The Money Party March 25, 2011

http://www.themoneyparty.org/main/?p=1519 

Michael Collins

According to an international scientific

group monitoring radiation around the

world, the Fukushima reactors are

emitting nuclear toxins at levelsapproaching those seen in the

"aftermath" of Chernobyl. The

Chernobyl disaster began with an

explosion, Fukushima is a smolderingcauldron of toxins. Chernobyl had 180

tonnes of nuclear fuel on site.Fukushima has 1700 tonnes of nuclear 

fuel on site. (Image)

This isn't the beginning of the end , as hoped. It's looking like the end of the beginning.

CounterPunch ran an interview wit Japanese nuclear industry author Hiroshe Takashi just

yesterday in which the author lamented the poor reporting of the tragedy in the Japanesepress:

"Really, they talk this nonsense, trying to reassure everyone, trying to avoid

panic. What we need now is a proper panic. Because the situation has come to thepoint where the danger is real." Hiroshe Takashi, March 22

Just two days later, the "proper panic" is on its way.

The Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics of Vienna, Austria has a world

wide monitoring system set up to monitor the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. They are

well positioned to monitor the effects of the Fukishima disaster.

The group told New Scientist that:

Japan's damaged nuclear plant in Fukushima has been emitting radioactive iodine

and cesium at levels approaching those seen in the aftermath of the Chernobyl

accident in 1986. Austrian researchers have used a worldwide network of radiation detectors – designed to spot clandestine nuclear bomb tests – to show

that iodine-131 is being released at daily levels 73 per cent of those seen after the

1986 disaster. The daily amount of caesium-137 released from Fukushima Daiichi

Page 2: They Said It Wasnt Like Chernobyl and They Were Wrong

8/7/2019 They Said It Wasnt Like Chernobyl and They Were Wrong

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/they-said-it-wasnt-like-chernobyl-and-they-were-wrong 2/4

is around 60 per cent of the amount released from Chernobyl.  New Scientist,

March 24

The concerns about spent fuel rods and cooling polls in the reactor have materialized.The Chernobyl event was more discrete and identifiable with a major explosion but

damaged reactors at Fukushima are toxic nonetheless. The Austrian scientists point outthat Chernobyl had 180 tons of nuclear on hand while Fukushima has nearly ten times

that amount at 1700 tons.

"When the fuel is damaged there is no reason for the volatile elements not to

escape," and the measured caesium and iodine are in the right ratios for the fuel

used by the Fukushima Daiichi reactors. Also, the Fukushima plant has around

1760 tonnes of fresh and used nuclear fuel on site, and an unknown amount hasbeen damaged. The Chernobyl reactor had only 180 tonnes. New Scientist, March

24

In his interview on the 22nd, Takashi was blunt about the health risks. He distinguishedbetween radiation in the atmosphere and radioactive particles carried in the atmosphere,

then ingested into the body.

Yoh: So making comparisons with X-rays and CT scans has no meaning. Because

you can breathe in radioactive material.Hirose: That’s right. When it enters your body, there’s no telling where it will go.

The biggest danger is women, especially pregnant women, and little children.

Now they’re talking about iodine and cesium, but that’s only part of it, they’re not

using the proper detection instruments. What they call monitoring means onlymeasuring the amount of radiation in the air. Their instruments don’t eat. What

they measure has no connection with the amount of radioactive material.Yoh: So damage from radioactive rays and damage from radioactive material arenot the same.

Hirose: If you ask, are any radioactive rays from the Fukushima Nuclear Station

here in this studio, the answer will be no. But radioactive particles are carried hereby the air. When the core begins to melt down, elements inside like iodine turn to

gas. It rises to the top, so if there is any crevice it escapes outside. Hiroshe

Takashi, CounterPunch, March 22

The Austrian Institute scientists also pointed out that the spread of radioactive isotopesfrom Chernobyl are still causing thyroid cancer today:

While in the body the isotopes' radioactive emissions can do significant damage,

mainly to DNA. Children who ingest iodine-131 can develop thyroid cancer 10 or 

more years later; adults seem relatively resistant. A study published in the US lastweek  found that iodine-131 from Chernobyl is still causing new cases of thyroid

cancer to appear at an undiminished rate in the most heavily affected regions of 

Ukraine, Belarus and Russia. New Scientist, March 24

Page 3: They Said It Wasnt Like Chernobyl and They Were Wrong

8/7/2019 They Said It Wasnt Like Chernobyl and They Were Wrong

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/they-said-it-wasnt-like-chernobyl-and-they-were-wrong 3/4

National Public Ratio (NPR) ran an interview with Japanese Green anti nuclear activist

Aileen Mioko Smith yesterday. She brought home the rapidly spreading awareness the

nuclear disaster in Japan.

She noted that a prominent Japanese scientist reworked the Tokyo Power data on soil

contamination within 40 kilometers of Fukushima and found that the levels of contamination could be twice that of similar areas near Chernobyl:

And the soil contamination is really high. Soil found 40 kilometers away—now,remember, it’s still 30 kilometers indoors, stay indoors; 20 kilometers, evacuation.

So, beyond that area, for example, north-northwest in Imatate, the levels on the

soil were very high—in fact, a thousand times iodine, 4,000 times the cesium

standard. And we just got a report from the Kyoto Research Reactor Institute, Dr.Tetsuji Imanaka, that said that—he had to look a little bit more into the sampling

of the Japanese government, but depending on how the sampling was done, this

level of contamination in the soil could be twice the amount that was compulsory

evacuation for Chernobyl. Aileen Mioko Smith, March 24

Smith commented on the "travesty" of Japanese earthquake guidelines for reactors. She

said:

I just want to address that the Japanese government’s earthquake reinforcementrequirements, the standards that are in place, even today, at all the nuclear power 

plants in Japan, is really a travesty. And actually, the Fukushima plant was

operating under 1978 guidelines. The new guidelines had been established in

2006, but even those guidelines underestimated this earthquake. The earthquakethat happened in Fukushima this time was 140 times or so more than the

maximum that was estimated under these new guidelines. And the new guidelinesdidn’t even take into consideration anything beyond the outer containment, and itdidn’t even take into consideration the spent nuclear fuel pools. Aileen Mioko

Smith, March 24

The Japanese public has awakened to a new world where tap water is a danger to children

and pregnant women, where food from one of the nation's key agricultural regions maybe toxic, and in which there is little safety offered by the guidelines that put in place

ticking time bombs that are subject to inevitable natural catastrophes.

The story will continue to unfold and the people of the world will then have to decide on

the wisdom of a laissez-faire energy policy that puts entire regions and nations at risk for health and safety.

END

This article may be reproduced entirely or in part with attribution of authorship and a link 

to this article.

Page 4: They Said It Wasnt Like Chernobyl and They Were Wrong

8/7/2019 They Said It Wasnt Like Chernobyl and They Were Wrong

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/they-said-it-wasnt-like-chernobyl-and-they-were-wrong 4/4

themoneyparty.org RSS