thermomechanical fluid-structure interaction in supersonic
TRANSCRIPT
Thermomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction in
Supersonic Flows: Experiments and Simulation
Katharina Martin, Stefanie Reese, IFAM, RWTH Aachen University
Dennis Daub, Burkard Esser, Ali Gülhan, AS-HYP, DLR Köln
Motivation
2
Aerothermal
Heating
Structural
Deformation
Why study thermomechanical FSI?
Motivation
Ariane 5 flight 517
Buckling of nozzle cooling
channels
3Stahlkocher - CC BY-SA 3.0
Motivation
4
Metallic thermal protection for reusable launchers
SpaceX - CC BY-NC 2.0
5
Motivation
NASA
Buckling of supersonic aircraft surface panels
Motivation
Dennis Daub
Joint experimental and numerical study of fluid-structure
coupled buckling problems using a generic configuration
Overview
Supersonic Fluid-Structure
Interaction in SFB TRR 40
• Turbulent SWBLI loads (D4 + D6 FP. 1/2)
• Flutter + Turbulent SWBLI (D6 FP. 3)
• Thermal buckling including plastic behavior
(D10 + D6 FP. 3)
8
Modelling / Simulation
9
Effect of buckling on the flow
panel mount
shockexpansion region
Ma = 7.7
nose shock
Main effects under
investigation
• Buckling with high amplitudes
• Plastic deformation
• Interaction of deformation
with flow field → strong
localized heating
α = 20°
Coupling tool IFLS, TU Braunschweig
Quasi-stationary process: fluid and structure
Equilibrium iteration method: Dirichlet-Neumann iteration
Transfer between grids: Lagrange multiplier
[Niesner, 2009; Haupt, 2009]
fluid
computation
fluid grid
transfer of
state quantities
solid grid
transfer of
state quantities
mechanical solid
computation
thermal solid
computation
Fluid-structure interaction (FSI)
10
• DLR Tau solver; laminar flow; ideal gas γ = 1.451
• Hybrid mesh, structured layers on the wall
• Mesh deforms as panel surface deforms
Fluid computation
Ma∞ = 7.7
p∞ = 50.3 Pa
T∞ = 477 K
α = 20°
freestream
viscous wallT(t0) = 300K
11
Material:
• panel and frame: Incoloy 800 HT
• isolation: Schupp Ultra Board 1850/500
• support plate: copper
Material model:
• mechanical: viscoplastic with nonlinear isotropic hardening + thermal expansion
• thermal: heat flux (Fourier) and radiation
Structural Computation
200 mm
12
100 mm
197 mmr = 45 mm
33 mm
17.5 mm
10 mm
35 mm
51.5 mm
55 mm 33 mm
nose not
modelled
panel
[Martin et al., 2018]
Mechanical boundary condition:
• bottom: circular fixation
• top: pressure p from fluid simulation
• symmetrical BC at y = 0
Boundary Conditions (BC)
T = 300K
13
q,p
nose not
modelled
Thermal boundary condition:
• bottom: temperature T = 300K
• top: heat flux q from fluid simulation
• cavity radiation between panel and
isolation / radiation on top surface
[Martin et al., 2018]
Material model for panel
14
• Viscoplastic material model with
– nonlinear isotropic hardening
– thermal expansion
– temperature dependent material parameters
• implemented in an Abaqus UMAT
• modified for a plane stress state in order to also use it
for shell elements
• thermo-dynamically consistent
• large deformations[Martin et al., 2019]
• Temperature range: 20°C – 1000°C
• loading rate: 0.5mm/min; 1mm/min
Material tests for Incoloy 800 HT
15
[Martin et al., 2018]
Arc-heated Wind Tunnel L3K
Ma∞ = 7.7
p∞ = 50.3 Pa
T∞ = 477 K
v∞ = 3756 m/s 16
[Daub, 2020]
Wind Tunnel Run
17
Instrumentation
Digital Image Correlation (DIC)
18
Infrared Thermography (IR)
Digital Image Correlation (DIC)
Validation (DIC)
20
Deformation
Validation (IR)
22
Surface Temperature
Reference Sensor Positions
FLOW
Panel (200x200)
front (50/0)
left (100/50)
center (100/0)
rear (150/0)
x
y
left
center rearfront
Comparison of Displacement Exp/Sim
25
Comparison at the center of the panel Comparison at four position of the panel
Comparison of Temperature Exp/Sim
26
Comparison at the center of the panel Comparison at four positions of the panel
Comparison Exp/Sim
27Comparison of displacement:
sim (left); exp (right)
Comparison of temperature:
sim (left); exp (right)
Discussion
28
More than 200 K
difference between rigid
and buckled case
Discussion
29
Influence of wall temperature on buckling shape
Conclusion
Interdisciplinary study of FSI in supersonic flow
• Fluid-Structure coupled simulations
• Modelling of plastic deformation
• Validation experiments with time-resolved full-field
instrumentation
Obtained good agreement between simulation and experiments
• Strong localized (FSI driven) heating
• Significant plastic deformation
30
Thank you
31
Financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) for the
SFB TRR 40 is gratefully acknowledged.