thermal, kinetic and morphological studies of available
TRANSCRIPT
Thermal, kinetic and morphological studies of available and
synthesized pyrotechnic/propellant compositions and their
ingredients
A Thesis Submitted to the Department of Chemical Engineering, School of
Chemical and Materials Engineering (SCME), NUST, Islamabad, in the
partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
In
Energetic Materials Engineering
Submitted by
Name: Zaheer-ud- din Babar
Reg No: 2011-NUST-TfrPhD-EM-E-78
Supervisor: Dr. Abdul Qadeer Malik
School of Chemical and Materials Engineering (SCME)
National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST)
H-12, Islamabad, Pakistan
List of Publications
Journal Papers (Published)
1. Zaheer-ud-din Babar, Abdul Qadeer Malik, Thermal and kinetic comparison of various
oxidizers used in propellant /pyrotechnic compositions, Caspian Journal of Applied Sciences
Research 2(7), pp. 63-69, 2013.
2. Zaheer-ud-din Babar, Abdul Qadeer Malik, Synthesis of micro porous barium nitrate with
improved ignition reliability as a reliable pyrotechnic oxidant, Journal of Saudi Chemical
Society, 18, pp.707-711, 2014.
3. Zaheer-ud-din Babar, Abdul Qadeer Malik, Kinetics of thermal decomposition of nano
magnesium oxide catalyzed ammonium perchlorate, Journal of Chemical Society of Pakistan,
36(6), 2014.
4. Zaheer-ud-din Babar, Abdul Qadeer Malik, An investigation of thermal decomposition
kinetics of nano zinc oxide catalyzed composite propellant, Combustion Science and
Technology, 187: 1295–1315, 2015.
5. Zaheer-ud-din Babar, Abdul Qadeer Malik, Thermal decomposition, ignition and kinetic
evaluation of magnesium and aluminum fuelled pyrotechnic compositions, Central European
Journal of Energetic Materials, 2015, 12(3), 579-592.
6. Zaheer-ud-din Babar, Abdul Qadeer Malik, Thermal decomposition and kinetic evaluation
of composite propellant material catalyzed with nano magnesium oxide. NUST Journal of
Engineering Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2014, pp. 5-14.
7. Zaheer-ud-din Babar, Abdul Qadeer Malik, Investigation of the thermal decomposition of
magnesium-sodium nitrate pyrotechnic composition (SR-524) and the effect of accelerated
aging, Journal of Saudi Chemical Society (Article in press).
Under Review
8. Zaheer-ud-din Babar, Abdul Qadeer Malik Accelerated ageing of SR-562 pyrotechnic
composition and investigation of its thermo kinetic parameters. (Journal of Fire and Materials)
International Conference
9. Zaheer-ud-din Babar, Abdul Qadeer Malik, Thermal decomposition and kinetic evaluation
of composite propellant material catalyzed with nano magnesium oxide. 3rd ASEAN-Pakistan
Conference on Materials Science (APCoMS-3) held on 25-27 November 2014 at Islamabad,
Pakistan.
i
Abstract
The work presented in this thesis is focused on the thermal, kinetic and morphological
studies of various pyrotechnic/propellant compositions and their ingredients. A lot of
research work has been carried out in the field of explosives; however, there is a lack of
theoretical understanding and experimental work concerning the reaction kinetics of the
pyrotechnics. The published work in the field of pyrotechnics presents some individual
studies concerning different aspects such as thermal behaviour, kinetics and aging of the
pyrotechnic compositions and their ingredients. The present work is a concerted effort to
provide an insight into the thermal behaviour, kinetics, aging and morphological aspects
of pyrotechnics/propellants. For this purpose, differential scanning calorimetry,
differential thermal analysis and thermogravimetery have been mainly used along with
scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction for accomplishment of the present
work.
The comparison of thermal cum kinetic behaviour of five different oxidizers that are
commonly used in various pyrotechnic/propellant compositions was carried out. Next,
modified barium nitrate with micro porous structure was synthesized using three different
vesicants to make it more reliable as a pyrotechnic oxidant. The pyrotechnic composition
formulated with the modified oxidizer ignited at a lower temperature as compared to the
one formulated with pure barium nitrate. The ignition behaviour of the vesicant modified
barium nitrate has not been reported earlier to the best of our knowledge. Moreover,
thermal and kinetic behaviour of ammonium perchlorate has been improved by
catalyzing it with a small amount of nano magnesium oxide catalyst. The results indicate
that the two distinct decomposition stages of the pure ammonium perchlorate merged
with each other and reduced to a single stage. Furthermore, the reaction rate constant of
the catalyzed AP also increased significantly.
Pyrotechnics and propellants are inherently associated with some potential safety hazards
and are therefore required to be investigated for their stability and decomposition
kinetics. The thermal, kinetic and ignition behaviour of three pyrotechnic mixtures has
ii
been investigated in detail to elucidate the mechanism of ignition of these fuel oxidizer
mixtures and to assess the thermal stability and reactivity.
Temperature and humidity are amongst the important factors that influence the shelf life
and ignition behaviour of the pyrotechnics. The effect of aging on two commonly used
military pyrotechnics has been studied. The investigated compositions include SR-524
and SR-562 pyrotechnic compositions. The results indicate that aging of the pyrotechnic
compositions at extreme conditions of temperature and humidity changed their thermal
behaviour, kinetics, chemical composition and the surface features.
The last part of the thesis describes in-depth kinetic analysis of three different versions of
the composite solid propellant. Magnesium oxide and zinc oxide nano particles were used
as catalysts to alter the performance of the composite propellant. The kinetic analysis has
been carried out by Kissinger method, Flynn–Wall–Ozawa method, Friedman method
and Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose method. The results indicate lowering of the
decomposition temperatures in the catalyzed versions of propellant. The kinetic analysis
showed increased reactivity of the catalyzed versions of the propellants.
In a nut shell, the work presented in the thesis provided new insight into the thermal,
kinetic and morphological aspects of propellants and pyrotechnics vis-a-vis their
enhanced reactivity through incorporation of vesicants and nano catalysts, coupled with
aging studies, to help design formulations for specific requirements wherever required.
iii
DEDICATED TO MY
Dearest Family
My Mother, Wife and Daughters
iv
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
All Commendations to Almighty Allah, The Most Beneficent, The Most Merciful, Who
blessed me with intellect, resoluteness and determination to accomplish the present
work. All the respects to His Holy Prophet Hazrat Muhammad (Peace be upon him),
who enabled us to recognize our Creator.
I owe my deepest and sincere gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Abdul Qadeer Malik. He
guided me with patience, wisdom and professionalism throughout my research work. I
can never forget his benign guidance, illustrative advice and keen interest. My thanks are
also due to my co-supervisor Dr. Hasnat Malik for his able guidance and technical
support. My special thanks are due to all the members of GEC for their step by step
guidance for the accomplishment of this work. Worthy members of the GEC include Dr.
Arshad Hussain (HOD Chemical Engineering Department), Dr. Habib Nasir and Dr.
Nazre Haider.
I would like to express my thanks to my friend Muhammad Ahsan for helping me
throughout these years with his software skills and giving me the moral support and hope
whenever I was depressed and frustrated. I shall also thank the admin officer Mr. Amjad
Khan for helping me in every possible manner for the conduct of experiments in different
labs. I also applaud the nice company of my class fellows i.e. Farooq, Muddassar, Sajid
Ali, Mukhtar and Sajid Nawaz. I always cherish the happy moments spent with them.
I pay my homage and sweet sensation of love and respect to my family including my
mother, my wife and my sweet daughters who prayed for me all the time and helped me
in every possible manner. It would not have been easy to complete this work without
their cooperation and prayers.
(ZAHEER-UD-DIN BABAR)
v
List of Contents
Chapter 1: General Introduction
1.1 Energetic Materials 1
1.1.1 High Explosives 1
1.1.2 Low explosives 1
1.1.3 Pyrotechnics and their applications 2
1.1.4 Distinction between propellants, explosives and pyrotechnics 3
1.2 Main Ingredients of pyrotechnic compositions 3
1.3 Important aspects concerning the performance of pyrotechnics 5
1.3.1 The fuel to oxidant ratio 5
1.3.2 Effect of particle size 6
1.3.3 Heat output of pyrotechnics 6
1.3.4 Ignition reliability and safety 7
1.4 Propellants 7
1.4.1 Liquid propellants 8
1.4.2 Liquid Monopropellants 9
1.4.3 Liquid Bipropellants 9
1.4.4 Solid propellants 10
1.4.5 Double based solid propellants 10
vi
1.4.6 Modified double based propellants 11
1.4.7 Composite solid propellants 11
1.5 Similarity of ingredients for composite propellants and pyrotechnics 12
1.6 Motivation for the present work 12
1.7 Analytical techniques and kinetic methods 14
1.8 Scope of the present work 15
References 19
Chapter 2: Experimental Techniques, Materials and Methods
2.1 Experimental Techniques 22
2.1.1 Thermal analysis 22
2.1.2 Different methods for thermal analysis 23
2.1.3 Differential Scanning calorimetry (DSC) 24
2.1.4 Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA) 26
2.1.5 Thermogravimetery (TG) 28
2.1.6 X-ray diffraction (XRD) 29
2.1.7 Scanning electron Microscopy (SEM) 31
2.1.8 Particle size analysis (PSA) 32
2.2 Materials Used 33
vii
2.2.1 Oxidizers 33
2.2.2 Fuels 34
2.2.3 Pyrotechnic Compositions 34
2.2.4 Composite solid propellant compositions 35
2.3 Kinetic evaluation methods. 36
2.3.1 Importance of Kinetics for solid state reactions 36
2.3.2 Kissinger method 37
2.3.3 Ozawa Method 39
2.3.4 Horowitz and Metzger Method 40
2.3.5 Flynn–Wall–Ozawa Method 41
2.3.6 Friedman Method 42
2.3.6 Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose Method 42
References 43
Chapter 3: Thermal and Kinetic comparison of commonly used oxidizers
3.1 Introduction 45
3.2 Experimental Conditions 47
3.3 Thermal and kinetic behaviour of Ammonium perchlorate 48
3.4 Thermal and kinetic behaviour of Ammonium Nitrate 51
3.5 Thermal and kinetic behaviour of Potassium Nitrate 54
3.6 Thermal and kinetic behaviour of Potassium Permanganate 57
3.7 Thermal and kinetic behaviour of Barium Nitrate 59
3.8 Comparative Analysis 61
3.9 Conclusions 64
viii
References 65
Chapter 4: Modification of barium nitrate and ammonium perchlorate
4.1 Synthesis of micro porous barium nitrate with improved ignition reliability 68
4.2 Introduction 68
4.3 Experimental Conditions 69
4.4 Results and Discussion 70
4.4.1 SEM Analysis 70
4.4.2 Bulk density 73
4.4.3 XRD Analysis 74
4.4.4 Thermal Analysis of binary pyrotechnic mixtures 78
4. 5 Conclusions 79
4.6 Improvement in the thermal and kinetic behaviour of ammonium perchlorate using
nano magnesium oxide catalyst 80
4.7 Introduction 80
4.8 Experimental Conditions 82
4.8.1 Kinetic Methods 83
4.9 Results and Discussion 84
4.9.1 Analysis of Nano particles 84
4.9.2 Analysis of Pure AP 84
4.9.3 Analysis of Catalyzed AP 91
4.9.4 Comparison of thermal and Kinetic Parameters 95
4.10 Conclusions 97
References 98
ix
Chapter 5: Thermal and kinetic evaluation of some magnesium and aluminum
fuelled pyrotechnic compositions
5.1 Introduction 101
5.2 Experimental conditions 103
5.3 Results and Discussion 104
5.3.1 Thermal analysis of the pyrotechnic ingredients 105
5.3.2 Thermal analysis of the pyrotechnic compositions 110
5.3.3 Variation in peak temperatures at multiple heating rates 113
5.3.4 Kinetic evaluation of the mixtures 116
5.3.5 Estimation of critical ignition temperature 119
5.3.6 Comparative analysis of the kinetic data and ignition temperatures 120
5.4 Conclusions 123
References 124
Chapter 6: Thermal decomposition of the magnesium fueled pyrotechnic
compositions and the effect of accelerated aging
6.1 Introduction 127
6.2 Thermal decomposition kinetics and effect of accelerated aging on SR-524
pyrotechnic composition 130
6.3 Experimental Conditions 130
6.4 Results and discussion 131
6.4.1 Thermal analysis of the fresh and aged composition 131
6.4.2 Kinetic Analysis of fresh and aged compositions 136
x
6.4.3 SEM Analysis of the fresh and the aged compositions 138
6.4.4 XRD Analysis 140
6.4.5 Comparison of fresh and aged compositions 142
6.4.6 Evaluation of the pyrotechnic thermal stability 143
6.5 Conclusions 144
6.6 Accelerated aging of SR-562 pyrotechnic composition and investigation of its
thermo kinetic parameters 145
6.7 Experimental Conditions 145
6.8 Results and discussion 146
6.8.1 Thermal Analysis of the fresh and aged compositions 146
6.8.2 Kinetic Analysis of the fresh and aged composition 150
6.8.3 SEM Analysis of fresh and aged compositions 152
6.8.4 XRD Analysis of fresh and aged compositions 154
6.8.5 Comparison of fresh and aged compositions 156
6.8.6 Estimation of thermal stability of the pyrotechnics 157
6.9 Conclusions 157
References 158
Chapter 7: Thermal decomposition kinetics of nano zinc oxide and nano magnesium
oxide catalyzed composite solid propellant
7.1 Introduction 160
7.2 Experimental Conditions 162
7.3 Kinetics of thermal decomposition 163
7.4 Results and Discussion 165
xi
7.4.1 Characterization of nano particles of ZnO 165
7.4.2 Characterization of nano particles of MgO 167
7.4.3 Analysis of Propellant composition A 168
7.4.4 Analysis of Propellant composition B 176
7.4.5 Analysis of Propellant composition C 184
7.5 Estimation of critical ignition temperature 191
7.6 Conclusions 192
References 193
Chapter 8: General Conclusions 196
xii
List of Tables
Table 2.1: The mass ratio of fuel and oxidizer in pyrotechnic mixtures 34
Table 3.1: Comparative data of the oxidizers 62
Table 4.1: Bulk density of pure and modified barium nitrate 74
Table 4.2: Lattice parameters of pure and modified barium nitrate 76
Table 4.3: Effect of heating rate on decomposition peaks 87
Table 4.4: Summary of kinetic data of non-catalyzed ammonium perchlorate 89
Table 4.5: Summary of kinetic data of catalyzed ammonium perchlorate 95
Table 5.1: Summary of experimental thermal data 109
Table 5.2: Effect of heating rate on the decomposition peak temperature of the
pyrotechnic mixtures 113
Table 5.3: Kinetic parameters of pyrotechnic mixtures 116
Table 6.1: Kinetic parameters of SR-524 pyrotechnic composition calculated by
Kissinger method 133
Table 6.2: Kinetic parameters of aged SR-524 pyrotechnic composition calculated by
Kissinger method 134
Table 6.3: Kinetic parameters of SR-562 pyrotechnic composition calculated from the
heat flow data 149
Table 6.4: Kinetic parameters of aged SR-562 pyrotechnic composition calculated from
the heat flow data 149
Table 7.1: Kinetic parameters of composite solid propellant calculated from DSC data by
Kissinger Method (Composition A) 172
xiii
Table 7.2: Activation energy data corresponding to different degrees of conversion for
propellant composition A (calculated from TG data) 173
Table 7.3: Kinetic parameters of composite solid propellant catalyzed with nano zinc
oxide calculated from DSC data by Kissinger Method (Composition B) 178
Table 7.4: Activation energy data corresponding to degree of conversion for propellant
composition B (calculated from TG data) 181
Table 7.5: Kinetic data obtained by Kissinger Method for MgO catalyzed composite
propellant from DSC data (Composition C) 187
Table 7.6: Activation energy data corresponding to different degrees of conversion for
MgO catalyzed composite propellant calculated from TG data 189
xiv
List of Figures
Figure 1.1: Schematic diagrams depicting the main ingredients of pyrotechnic
compositions 4
Figure 1.2: Flow chart showing the general classification of propellants 8
Figure 1.3: Flow chart showing the road map for the accomplishment of present work 15
Figure 2.1: DSC Instrument model number DSC823e 25
Figure 2.2: The diamond TG/DTA Instrument 27
Figure 2.3: Main components of the TG system 29
Figure 2.4: Main components of the XRD instrument 30
Figure 2.5: Scanning electron microscope JSM- 6490 LA 32
Figure 2.6: Particle size distribution analyzer LA-920 33
Figure 3.1: TG/DTA curve of ammonium per chlorate 49
Figure 3.2: Graph used for calculation of activation energy of Ammonium
Perchlorate 50
Figure 3.3: TG/DTA curve of ammonium nitrate 52
Figure 3.4: Graph for calculation of activation energy of Ammonium Nitrate 53
Figure 3.5: TG/DTA curve of potassium nitrate 55
Figure 3.6: Graph for calculation of activation energy of Potassium Nitrate 56
Figure 3.7: TG/DTA curve of potassium permanganate 58
Figure 3.8: TG/DTA curve of barium nitrate showing the heat flow and mass loss 59
Figure 3.9: The kinetic plot of barium nitrate representing the Horowitz Method 60
Figure 4.1: SEM micrographs of pure barium nitrate 71
xv
Figure 4.2(a): SEM micrographs of barium nitrate modified with potassium carbonate 72
Figure 4.2(b): SEM micrographs of barium nitrate modified with sodium bicarbonate 72
Figure 4.2(c): SEM micrographs of barium nitrate modified with ammonium
perchlorate 73
Figure 4.3: XRD spectra of pure barium nitrate 75
Figure 4.4 (a): XRD spectra of barium nitrate modified with ammonium perchlorate 75
Figure 4.4 (b): XRD spectra of barium nitrate modified with ammonium perchlorate 76
Figure 4.4 (c): XRD spectra of barium nitrate modified with sodium bi carbonate 77
Figure 4.5: Heat Flow curves of aluminum with pure and modified barium 78
Figure 4.6: SEM micrograph of nano sized MgO powder used for catalyzing AP 84
Figure 4.7: XRD spectra of the nano sized MgO powder 85
Figure 4.8: TG/DTA curve of pure ammonium per chlorate 86
Figure 4.9: Effect of heating rates on the thermal decomposition of pure ammonium
perchlorate 87
Figure 4.10 (a): Kissinger Plot for Low stage decomposition of pure AP 88
Figure.10 (b): Kissinger plot for high stage decomposition of pure AP 89
Figure 4.10 (c): The Ozawa plot for low temperature decomposition stage of pure AP 90
Figure 4.10(d): Ozawa plot for high temperature decomposition stage of ammonium
perchlorate 91
Figure 4.11: TG/DTA Curve of AP + 4 Percent MgO 92
Figure 4.12: Effect of heating rates on thermal decomposition of AP + 4 Percent MgO 92
Figure 4.13(a): Kissinger Plot for decomposition of catalyzed AP 93
Figure 4.13(b): Ozawa Plot for the decomposition of catalyzed AP 94
xvi
Figure 5.1: Particle size distribution of aluminum powder (Davg= 20µm) 104
Figure 5.2: Particle size distribution of magnesium powder (Davg= 24µm) 104
Figure 5.3: TG curve of magnesium powder showing the mass gain due to oxidation 105
Figure 5.4: XRD spectra of the residue obtained after oxidation of magnesium powder
showing typical MgO peaks 106
Figure 5.5: TG curve of aluminum powder showing the mass gain due to oxidation
in air 107
Figure 5.6: TG/DTA curve of barium nitrate showing the heat flow and mass loss
curves 108
Figure 5.7: TG/DTA curve of Al + Ba (NO3)2 pyrotechnic composition showing the mass
loss and heat flow curves 110
Figure 5.8: TG/DTA curve of Mg + NH4ClO4 pyrotechnic composition showing the
mass loss and heat flow curves 111
Figure 5.9: TG/DTA curve of Mg + KMnO4 pyrotechnic composition showing the
mass loss and heat flow curves 112
Figure 5.10(a): Effect of heating rate on thermal decomposition of mixture containing Al
and Ba (NO3)2 114
Figure 5.10(b): Effect of heating rate on thermal decomposition of mixture containing
Mg and NH4ClO4 115
Figure 5.10(c): Effect of heating rate on thermal decomposition of mixture containing
Mg and NH4ClO4 115
Figure 5.11 (a): Kissinger plot for determination of activation energy of pyrotechnic
composition containing Al + Ba (NO3)2 117
xvii
Figure 5.11 (b): Kissinger plot for determination of activation energy of pyrotechnic
composition containing Mg + NH4ClO4 118
Figure 5.11 (c): Kissinger plot for determination of activation energy of pyrotechnic
composition containing Mg + KMnO4 118
Figure 6.1: The heat flow curves of fresh and aged SR-524 pyrotechnic compositions 131
Figure 6.2 (a): Effect of multiple heating rates on the heat flow curve of Fresh SR 524
pyrotechnic composition 132
Figure 6.2(b): Effect of multiple heating rates on the heat flow curve of aged SR 524
pyrotechnic composition 134
Figure 6.3: The mass loss curve of fresh and aged SR 524 pyrotechnic compositions 135
Figure 6.4(a): The Kissinger graph for determination of kinetic parameters of fresh SR
524 pyrotechnic composition 136
Figure 6.4(b): The Kissinger graph for determination of kinetic parameters of aged SR
524 pyrotechnic composition 137
Figure 6.5 (a): SEM micrographs of the fresh SR-524 composition showing smooth and
solid surfaces 139
Figure 6.5(b): SEM micrographs of aged SR-524 composition showing micro cracks 140
Figure 6.6: XRD spectra of fresh and aged SR 524 pyrotechnic composition 141
Figure 6.7: Comparison of the DTA curve of fresh and aged SR-562 pyrotechnic
composition 146
Figure 6.8: Effect of heating rate on the DTA curve of fresh SR-562 Pyrotechnic
composition 147
xviii
Figure 6.9: Effect of heating rate on the DTA curve of aged SR-562 pyrotechnic
composition 148
Figure 6.10 (a): Kissinger graph for calculation of Kinetic parameters of fresh SR-562
pyrotechnic composition 150
Figure 6.10 (b): Kissinger graph for calculation of Kinetic parameters of aged SR-562
pyrotechnic composition 151
Figure 6.11(a): SEM micrographs of fresh SR 562 pyrotechnic composition showing
solid and even surface 153
Figure 6.11(b): SEM micrographs of aged SR 562 pyrotechnic composition at showing
micro sized cracks 153
Figure 6.12(a): XRD spectra of fresh SR-562 pyrotechnic composition showing the
presence of magnesium, sodium nitrate and calcium oxalate 154
Figure 6.12(b): XRD spectra of aged SR-562 pyrotechnic composition showing the
presence of magnesium hydroxide as the reaction product of aging 155
Figure 7.1: XRD pattern of nano sized zinc oxide used as catalyst (Miller indices
marked) 165
Figure 7.2: SEM micrograph of zinc oxide nano particles 166
Figure 7.3: SEM micrograph of magnesium oxide nano particles 167
Figure 7.4: XRD spectra of the MgO nano particles 168
Figure 7.5: Effect of heating rate on the DSC curve of composition A representing un-
catalyzed CSP 169
Figure 7.6: Mass loss pattern of propellant composition A at multiple heating rates 170
xix
Figure 7.7: Graph representing the Kissinger method for determination of kinetic
parameters of composition A from DSC data 171
Figure 7.8(a): Graph representing the Flynn–Wall–Ozawa method for determination of
kinetic parameters of composite solid propellant from TG data 174
Figure 7.8(b): Graph representing the Friedman method for determination of kinetic
parameters of composite solid propellant from TG data 174
Figure 7.8(c): Graph representing the Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose (KAS) method for
determination of kinetic parameters of composite solid propellant from TG
data 175
Figure 7.9: Plot showing the activation energies versus extent of conversion for
composition A by three different methods (calculated from TG data) 175
Figure 7.10: Effect of heating rate on the heat flow curve of composition B containing
2% nano zinc oxide as a catalyst 176
Figure 7.11: Mass loss curve of propellant composition A and B 177
Figure 7.12: Mass loss pattern of propellant composition B at multiple heating rates 178
Figure 7.13: Graph representing the Kissinger method for determination of kinetic
parameters of composition B from DSC data 179
Figure 7.14(a): Graph representing the Friedman method for determination of kinetic
parameters of nano zinc oxide catalyzed composite propellant from TG
data 181
Figure 7.14(b): Graph representing the FWO method for determination of kinetic
parameters of nano zinc oxide catalyzed composite propellant from TG
data 182
xx
Figure 7.14 (c): Graph representing the KAS method for determination of kinetic
parameters of zinc oxide catalyzed composite propellant from TG
data 182
Figure 7.15: Plot showing the activation energies versus extent of conversion for
composition B by three different methods (calculated from TG data) 183
Figure 7.16: The DSC curves for MgO catalyzed composite propellant at multiple heating
rates 184
Figure 7.17: The TG curves for the MgO catalyzed propellant at multiple heating
rates 185
Figure 7.18: The Kissinger graph for catalyzed version of the propellant
(Composition C) 186
Figure 7.19(a): Representative graph of Friedman method for kinetic evaluation of the
propellant composition C 189
Figure 7.19(b): Representative graph of Flynn–Wall–Ozawa method for kinetic
evaluation of the propellant composition C 190
Figure 7.19(c): Representative graph of Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose method for kinetic
evaluation of the propellant composition C 190
Figure 7.20: The “E” versus “α” curve of the composite propellant composition C 191
xxi
List of Acronyms and Symbols
α Degree of conversion also called extent of conversion
A Frequency factor also known as pre-exponential factor (s-1
),
ABOL All Burn on Launch
AP Ammonium perchlorate
Heating rate (oC min
-1)
BLO Boiled Linseed Oil
CSP Composite solid propellant
DBP Double Base Propellants
DSC Differential Scanning Calorimetry
DTA Differential Thermal Analysis
E Activation energy (kJmol-1
)
Activation energy (kJmol-1
) corresponding to a specific degree of
conversion „α‟
GAP Glycidyl Azide Polymer
Enthalpy of activation (kJmol-1
)
HMX High Melting Explosive (Cyclotetramethylenetetranitarmine)
HTPB Hydroxy-terminated polybutadiene
ICTAC International Confederation for Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
xxii
k Reaction rate constant (s-1
)
n Order of reaction
PBAN Polybutadiene acrylonitrile
R Gas constant (Jmol-1
K-1
)
RDX Royal Development Explosive (Cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine)
SEM Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)
STA Simultaneous Thermal Analysis
T Sample temperature (oC)
Temperature (oC) corresponding to a certain degree of conversion „α‟
Critical temperature of thermal explosion (oC),
Onset temperature (oC) corresponding to → 0
Temperature of decomposition peak (oC)
TG Thermogravimetery
TMOs Transition Metal Oxides
XRD X-ray Diffraction
1
Chapter No. 1
General Introduction
1.1 Energetic Materials
“Energetic materials” is a soft term commonly used to refer propellants, explosives and
pyrotechnics. These are the chemicals or materials that possess a huge amount of energy
that is released at a very high rate when these materials are suitably ignited. These
materials are commonly used for various military and commercial applications. Energetic
materials are generally classified into two different categories i.e. the high explosives and
the low explosives. A brief introduction to these categories of the energetic materials is
obligatory before the actual account of the present work is narrated.
1.1.1 High Explosives
These are the class of explosives that undergo combustion by the detonation
phenomenon. The detonation means that the chemical reaction is very fast and violent
associated with extremely high temperatures and pressures [1]. The detonation reaction is
so fast that it proceeds faster than the speed of sound. The velocity of detonation for
commonly used high explosives ranges between 3 and 10 km s
-1. A very simple and
interesting comparison of velocity of detonation with the speed of sound will give a better
idea regarding the magnitude of the detonation velocity. The speed of sound in air is
nearly 330m s-1
and the detonation velocity of HMX is nearly 9.1km s-1
which means that
this explosive detonates with the speed that is nearly 28 times higher than that of the
sound.
1.1.2 Low explosives
The low explosives do not undergo detonation rather they decompose by the deflagration
process. These reactions proceed at much lower burning rates as compared to the
detonation. The flame front in the deflagration reactions proceeds with a subsonic
2
velocity [2]. Contrary to the high explosives where the oxygen required for the
combustion is present within the explosive molecule, low explosives generally are a
mixture of a fuel and an oxidizer. The low explosives generally include propellants and
pyrotechnics such as flares and sparklers.
1.1.3 Pyrotechnics and their applications
Pyrotechnics are materials or chemicals which are capable of producing some special
effects like heat, light, smoke and sound [3]. When these compositions are appropriately
initiated, they undergo combustion and release heat. Heat is the essential output in all the
cases and the other effects are also associated in some way or the other with the heat
output [3]. For instance, light output of the pyrotechnics depends largely on the amount
of heat released and the production of high temperatures that are required to give light
effect. Similarly, production of smokes for screening or signaling applications depends
on the heat released by the pyrotechnic material or composition. The use of chemicals in
the art of “fireworks” started thousands of years ago in countries like India and China.
Later on these energetic chemicals were used for military applications in different parts
of the world. For past several decades now, the pyrotechnics are being used very
scientifically and their special effects are being used in various civil and military
applications to achieve the desired outputs. Some of the applications of commonly used
pyrotechnics are listed below:
(a) Signaling and smoke screening
(b) Tracking, illumination and different types of decoys
(c) Incendiary compositions
(d) Different pyro-mechanisms
(e) Igniters and delay systems
After a brief and general introduction to the pyrotechnics, chemical composition of the
pyrotechnic will be discussed.
3
1.1.4 Distinction between propellants, explosives and pyrotechnics
The propellants, high explosives and pyrotechnics are all energetic materials and when
suitably initiated release a huge amount of energy that can be channelized for different
applications. It is important to clearly differentiate between the high explosives,
propellants and the pyrotechnics on the basis of the type of their combustion. The
combustion of propellants and pyrotechnics takes place by the deflagration phenomena.
Deflagration means fast and rapid burning due to layer by layer and systematic
combustion of the pyrotechnic explosive composition. However, combustion takes place
by the detonation phenomena in case of high explosives. Detonation takes place due to a
shock wave moving towards the unreacted explosive at a super-sonic speed. The
detonation is associated with extra ordinarily high temperatures and pressures. The
propellants and pyrotechnics both undergo decomposition by the deflagration process;
however, they can be differentiated on the basis of their specific role.
1.2 Main ingredients of pyrotechnic compositions
Most of the pyrotechnic compositions are heterogeneous mixture of a fuel and some kind
of oxidizer [4]. The oxidizer provides the oxygen required for the combustion of the fuel
and eliminates the dependence of the pyrotechnic composition on the external oxygen.
Some other additives are also added to the pyrotechnic composition to produce the
different kind of special effects. It is interesting to mention here that some of the
materials do not undergo combustion but still they are considered to be pyrotechnics due
to the fact that they produce some kind of special effect. A typical example of such a case
is the titanium tetrachloride. It does not undergo combustion but gives a smoke by
reaction with the water vapours present in the air. The pyrotechnics make use of a large
variety of chemicals to produce a specific composition with desired properties. The fuels
are mostly metallic in nature; however, the non-metallic fuels are also used. The major
role of the fuel is to provide high energy when it is combusted in the presence of the
oxygen. Aluminum, magnesium, iron, manganese, chromium, titanium, zirconium and
tungsten are some of the metallic fuels used in different pyrotechnic compositions.
4
Whereas, the non- metallic fuels used in the pyrotechnic mixtures include boron, carbon,
silicon, phosphorous and sulphur. There is a wide variety of oxidizers which are being
used in the pyrotechnics to provide oxygen necessary for the combustion of the fuel.
These oxidizers include chlorates, perchlorates, nitrates, chromates, dichromates, oxides
etc. Some of the oxidizers do not provide the oxygen rather they act as oxidizing agent
such as halocarbons. The main components of pyrotechnic compositions have been
depicted in Figure 1.1.
Figure 1.1 Schematic diagrams depicting the main ingredients of
pyrotechnic compositions
Another important ingredient used in the manufacture of pyrotechnics is the binder. It is
used to bind and consolidate the fuel and oxidizer present in the pyrotechnic mixture.
Binders also protect the metal powders used as fuel from reacting with the atmospheric
air or moisture. A large number of binders are used in the field of pyrotechnic and some
of them are paraffin wax, lithographic varnish, boiled linseed oil and different types of
5
resins. The pyrotechnic compositions are generally very sensitive to friction and the
binders also help in reducing the sensitivity to friction.
Sometimes it is necessary to slow down the actual burn rate of certain specific
compositions. For this purpose some retardant materials are used in the pyrotechnic
compositions along with the fuel and oxidizer It is important to highlight here that
addition of any material other than the stoichiometric amounts of the fuel and oxidizer
bears an effect on the burn rate of the pyrotechnic compositions. Sometimes additives
which are endothermic in nature are added to reduce the overall heat evolved when the
composition is ignited. We have already discussed the role of binder in the preceding
paragraph and even the addition of binders to the pyrotechnic composition alters the
burning rate.
1.3 Important aspects concerning the performance of pyrotechnics
It is essential that the performance of pyrotechnic composition is above mark during its
operation and it must be able to give the desired output. The overall performance of
pyrotechnics depends on many factors some of which have been discussed briefly.
1.3.1 The fuel-to-oxidant ratio
Fuel-to-oxidant ratio is one of the most important factors that influence the performance
of the pyrotechnic compositions [3]. The pyrotechnic compositions are generally mixture
of a fuel and the oxidizer. The oxidizer provides the oxygen when it is decomposed and
the fuel reacts with the oxygen to release the heat energy. It is therefore necessary to mix
the correct proportion of the fuel and the oxidizer to get complete combustion of the fuel
for optimum performance of the pyrotechnic composition. The chemical reaction
between the fuel and oxidizer needs to be balanced by selecting the correct stoichiometric
ratio of the reactants. This will ensure that both the reactants will be consumed
completely and convert into the desired products. The pyrotechnic compositions designed
with correct stoichiometric ratios of the reactants are likely to provide the best possible
results. The appropriate fuel-to-oxidant ratio will also help in attaining the maximum
possible burn rates due to the fact that the heat output of the stoichiometric mixture will
be the maximum. If the pyrotechnic mixture is rich or lean in fuel, it is likely to affect the
6
overall performance of the pyrotechnic composition in terms of its heat output and burn
rate. In certain specific cases the pyrotechnic compositions during their use are bound to
be exposed to the atmospheric oxygen. In such cases, the stoichiometric ratios will not
give the best results but a fuel rich mixture will give better performance.
1.3.2 Effect of particle size
The particle size of the fuel and the oxidizers is one of the important factors for all the
reactive systems such as energetic materials including propellants, explosives and
pyrotechnics [5-7]. It is essential to consider the particle size of the materials used in the
pyrotechnic composition especially where the high reactivity is desired. The maximum
temperature that is achieved by the combustion of fuel oxidizer mixture depends on the
heat of reaction. Researchers working in the field of energetic materials have found that
the heat of reaction increases with decrease in the particle size. The small particle size
means a large surface area and it becomes easy for the reaction to take place. The
reaction proceeds faster with the smaller particles as compared to the large ones in case
all other parameters are same. Metals such as aluminum, magnesium, iron and
manganese are generally used as pyrotechnic fuel. These metal powders are generally
available in different particle sizes. The particle sizes are measured in terms of microns
(µ). It is also called as a micrometer and is the one millionth part of a meter. The particle
sizes of the metals powders being used in the pyrotechnics are generally in the range of
5µ to 1000µ. It is not always a good idea to use a very small and same size of the
particles in the entire composition. In some applications such as the composite
propellants, oxidizer particles having different sizes are used to increase the loading
density. The appropriate particle size of the fuel and oxidizer particles is mandatory to
achieve better reactivity of pyrotechnic compositions. It would not be out of place to
mention the importance of homogeneity of the ingredients for getting the desired
reactivity for not only pyrotechnics but also for propellants and explosives.
1.3.3 Heat output of pyrotechnics
Heat is produced whenever a pyrotechnic composition is ignited. This heat is the primary
output of the pyrotechnics and it contributes to the other effects also such as light smoke
7
etc. The heats of reaction for the pyrotechnic compositions are therefore important for
determination of the specific application in which these compositions will be used. The
heat of reaction is measured by the calorimetric methods. The units for the heat of
reaction are calories per gram or calories per mole. “Calorie” is the unit of heat and it is
defined as the amount of heat that is required for raising the temperature of one gram of
water by one degree Celsius. By applying the basic concept of a calorimeter, the heat
released by the combustion of the pyrotechnic mixture or any energetic composition can
be calculated. It is generally a matter of intended application of the energetic composition
that determines the requirement of either high or low heat of reaction.
1.3.4 Ignition reliability and safety
One of the most desirous properties of the pyrotechnic composition is that they must
undergo the ignition reliably. Safety is another concern and therefore the good
pyrotechnic composition will be the one that has reliable ignition and it is completely safe
during the storage, handling and operation. There have been some incidents where the
pyrotechnic compositions have been inadvertently ignited and in other cases they have
failed to initiate at all. There could be many reasons for the above mentioned anomalies
but one of the main reasons is the source of ignition as to how these compositions are
ignited. The proper ignition system is a must for the pyrotechnics.
1.4 Propellants
Propellants are chemicals that are used for the propulsion of different objects including
missiles, rockets, gun bullets etc. They are explosives in nature but they are designed to
burn smoothly in a controlled manner to deliver propulsive energy. The high pressure
gases produced as a result of propellant combustion are expelled through some opening
or nozzle to achieve the propulsion. Propellant generally comprise of two main
components including fuel and the oxidizer. The oxygen liberated by the oxidizer reacts
with the fuel to provide high energy in the form of hot gases. Propellants give us an
effective and easy way of attaining the propulsion. From the view point of battlefield
weapons, there are two different categories of the propellant i.e. liquid propellant and
solid propellant. The weapon systems make use of one of these two types of propellants
8
based on the operational requirements for which they are used. A brief introduction to
both types of propellants is considered essential to differentiate the two from each other.
The flow chart showing the general classification of propellant is shown in Figure 1.2.
Figure 1.2 Flow chart showing the general classification of propellants
1.4.1 Liquid propellants
These propellants are in the liquid form as specified in their name itself. The propulsion
systems that make use of the liquid propellants have the fuel and the oxidizer stored
separately. The fuel and oxidizer are mixed together in the combustion chamber when
ignition of the fuel is required. Such systems are generally referred as rocket engine [8].
The liquid propellant based systems are intricate in their operation as compared to the
solid ones. The main advantage of these propellants is that the range of the missile can be
controlled. Moreover, they have better performance in terms of the specific impulse
9
which is a figure of merit to evaluate the performance of the missile systems. Two types
of liquid propellants are popular for use in the rocket motor.
1.4.2 Liquid Monopropellants
These propellants are made up of a single material that contains both the fuel as well as
the oxidizer part in itself. These materials decompose exothermically and evolve heat and
gases. These propellant systems have the advantage of the simplicity of design and
operation. They may be ignited by using, pressure, thermal effects or by using catalysts.
They suffer from the disadvantage of low performance as compared to other types of
propellants. Therefore, their role is limited to low power applications e.g. gas generators
and attitude control thrusters. Some of the monopropellant may offer better performance
like nitro methane, however, it is very difficult to initiate. Some of the commonly used
monopropellants are hydrogen peroxide, hydrazine, nitrous oxide and steam under
external heating.
1.4.3 Liquid Bipropellants
The liquid bipropellants employ two different components, one of which is a fuel and the
other one is the oxidizer. The fuel and oxidizer are stored in two different and isolated
tanks so that they are not mixed with each other till they reach the chamber where
combustion is required to produce thrust. The bipropellants are preferred over the
monopropellant because they are safe and their specific impulse is also higher. Different
methods are used to ignite the bipropellants and some of which are pyrotechnic igniters
and spark plugs. There is special class of bipropellants that is known as hypergolic and
they do not require any external source of ignition fuel and the oxidizers spontaneously
ignite when they come in contact with each other [9]. But this is not a very safe method
of ignition and warrants special care in design to avoid accidental mixing of fuel and the
oxidizer due to leakage or hardware failure. Some examples of the of the bi propellants
combinations include red fuming nitric acid and kerosene, red fuming nitric acid and
unsymmetrical di-methyl hydrazine, liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen, liquid oxygen
and ethanol.
10
1.4.4 Solid propellants
These propellants are in the solid form after their ingredients have been processed. The
fuel and the oxidizer are both part of the solid propellant and unlike liquid propellants
they are not kept separately rather they are mixed together to form a solid grain. These
propellants are therefore safe from the storage and operational point of view. The rocket
motors are filled with the solid propellant and the combustion takes place as soon as the
motor is suitably initiated. These propellants burn very fast evolving large amount of heat
and gas which are vented through the nozzle to produce thrust. Burning surface area
plays a very important role in the performance of the solid propellants. It is therefore very
essential that the geometry of the burn surface is carefully designed. The solid propellant
grains are manufactured in various geometrical forms like cigarette shape, star centered,
slotted cylinder, multi perforation etc. The range of solid propellant based missiles cannot
be controlled during operation. Once ignited, the propellant will burn completely and
continue to produce thrust till it is fully consumed. Solid propellants can be further sub
divided into different categories such as double based propellants and composite
propellants.
1.4.5 Double based solid propellants
They are called as double based propellants because two different energetic materials
form the base and propellant contains nitrocellulose and nitroglycerin as the active
ingredients. The oxygen required for the combustion of fuel is present inside the same
compound [10]. Stabilizer is another main component of the double based propellants. It
is used to increase the storage life of the propellant by removing the oxides of nitrogen. If
not removed, these oxides may be detrimental to the propellant composition and degrade
it considerably. Based on the manufacturing process, double based propellants are further
classified as cast double based and extruded double based solid propellants. They are
sometimes called as homogenous propellants and their specific impulse is generally not
very high and typically around 210 seconds. In certain cases where the propellant grain is
designed to provide a considerably large burn area, the specific impulse of close to 230
seconds can be achieved. A well-known example of such a case is the double based
11
propellant used for all burn on launch (ABOL) rocket motors. The double based
propellants are also used for some secondary functions like for jettisoning of parts and
separation of different stages. It would not be out of place to mention that the double base
propellants have the advantage of less visible exhaust plume and therefore they are
suitable for use in tactical weapons where the launch location is required to be
concealed.
1.4.6 Modified double based propellants
As discussed above, the double base solid propellants suffer from the limitation of low
specific impulse and therefor their use is also limited for high performance applications.
These propellants can be effectively modified to improve their performance significantly
by the addition of some modifiers. Such propellants are then called as modified double
based propellants. Generally some oxidizer such as ammonium perchlorate is added as a
source of oxygen improves their oxygen balance. Also some energetic fuel such as the
aluminum metal powder is also added to achieve higher heat release. These additions are
known to have a great influence on the propellant to increase its performance in terms of
the specific impulse. Some high explosives such as “RDX” and “HMX” are sometimes
also added to further improve the performance of these propellants [11].
1.4.7 Composite solid propellants
The composite propellants are different from double based propellants mainly because
they contain separate materials to act as fuel and oxidizer. They are mixture of powdered
metallic fuel mostly aluminum and some oxidizers like ammonium perchlorate. The
oxidizer constitutes major part by mass of the propellant and in some cases it may be as
high as 90 percent. The fuel oxidizer mixture is held in the matrix of a polymeric binder.
Some of the commonly used binders are hydroxy terminated polybutadiene (HTPB),
polybutadiene acrylonitrile (PBAN) and glycidyl azide polymer (GAP)[12-14]. The
binder is not only used as a polymeric matrix to hold the ingredients of composite
propellant but it also acts as a fuel during the combustion process. A very small amount
of different additives is also mixed in the composite propellant to improve its burn rate
12
and mechanical properties. The composite propellants can be given any desired shape or
geometry before they are finally dried up. The propellants are classified on the basis of
the binder that is used to hold the ingredients. The hydroxy terminated polybutadiene and
polybutadiene acrylonitrile are the common choices for majority of compositions
although quite a few other binders are also being developed and used. The density,
burning rate and the specific impulse of the PBAN based composite propellants is better
as compared to the HTPB based formulations. However, the former has difficulties in
mixing, processing and requires high temperatures for curing. HTPB based propellants
offer ease of processing and therefore preferred in most formulations. In fact both these
binders are being used in a variety of applications as they have good mechanical
properties and overall decent performance. Some of the other additions used in composite
solid propellants include the plasticizers and the curing agents. All the ingredients have a
one or more different role that is necessary to get a good quality of final product with
desired properties.
1.5 Similarity of ingredients for composite propellants and
pyrotechnics
We have discussed the main ingredients of pyrotechnic compositions and different types
of propellants. The comparison of the ingredients shows that some of the main
components of the pyrotechnic compositions and composite solid propellant are
somewhat similar. For instance, in both the cases, metallic fuel, inorganic oxidizers and
binders are used. Moreover, the pyrotechnic and propellants are both regarded as low
explosives and they decompose or ignite by burning/deflagration and do not undergo
detonation like high explosives. Although, our prime focus in the present work has been
on the pyrotechnics but we have also investigated and modified some of the composite
propellant compositions.
1.6 Motivation for the present work
A brief introduction to the energetic materials especially to pyrotechnics has been
presented above to build up the basis for the motivation and the scope of the present
13
work. The present work is focused on the thermal, kinetic and morphological analysis of
various pyrotechnic and propellant compositions and their ingredients. Main role of the
pyrotechnics has traditionally been limited to the art or the display of fireworks. Ever
since my childhood I have been fascinated by the fireworks and display of beautiful
colors in the sky. For most of us pyrotechnic may be merely a spectacular event at the
start of a football world cup or at the closing ceremony of Olympics. Things are not that
simple and over a period of time the pyrotechnics have transformed into the science and
technology of energetic materials. They are being designed to perfection for various
military applications to meet the stringent requirements of the defence forces. The
chemistry of pyrotechnics and propellants is an important area in the field of energetic
materials engineering i.e. explosive engineering. The fundamental principles and
associated mechanisms involved in the pyrotechnic reactions offer a large scope for the
scientific investigation in this area.
The literature survey revealed that a lot of research work has been carried out in the field
of explosives and propellants; however, there is lack of theoretical understanding and
experimental work concerning the reaction kinetics of the pyrotechnics. The same
concern has been mentioned in a recent review paper on the pyrotechnics [15]. The
authors stated that:
“Compared to the fairly exact, well-defined science of propellant and explosive
technology, there is a lack of theory and understanding factors which influence the
kinetics of pyrotechnic reactions”.
The present work has been dedicated to the thermal, kinetic and morphological studies of
various pyrotechnic compositions and the composite solid propellant. The rational for
selecting the pyrotechnic and the composite propellant is that the main ingredients in both
the cases are somewhat similar to each other. The aim is to systematically evaluate the
thermal behaviour and associated kinetics of some of the main ingredients i.e. oxidizers
and fuels and then extend the analysis to the actual pyrotechnic and propellant
compositions.
14
1.7 Analytical techniques and kinetic methods
Thermal analysis is a set of most important tools that is being effectively used around the
world for the investigation of energetic materials. Pyrotechnic studies based on thermal
analysis are aimed at investigation of the thermal stability, kinetic and combustion
mechanism [16,17]. Most common techniques that have been used in this regard include
differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), differential thermal analysis (DTA),
thermogravimetery (TG) and modulated temperature differential scanning calorimetry
(MTDSC). All these techniques play a valuable role in the analysis of energetic materials
and can be used in a variety of applications. DTA, DSC and TG have been mostly used
for the accomplishment of the present work along with some other techniques which
include X-ray diffraction technique (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM) and
particle size analyzer. The set of above mentioned thermal techniques provides
information regarding different thermal events such as thermal decomposition, solid state
phase transformations, melting and various other phenomena.
TG has become very popular technique during the past one decade for the researchers
working in the field of energetic materials. It is being used to study the oxidation process
of the pyrotechnic fuel in the presence of air or oxygen atmosphere. Thermal
decomposition of the pyrotechnics and propellants has been effectively studied in this
work by using this technique.
Thermal cum kinetic evaluation of energetic materials is essential to assess their thermal
stability and reactivity. The thermal data obtained from TG, DTA and DSC experiments
is used to calculate the kinetic parameters for elucidation of the reaction mechanism. The
kinetic analysis in the present work has been carried out by using six different methods
including Kissinger method, Ozawa method, Horowitz and Metzger method, Friedman
method, Flynn–Wall–Ozawa method and Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose method. The main
strength of the kinetic methods based on thermal analysis is that both the analytical data
and kinetic parameters are obtained from the same experiments and in a relatively shorter
time. The detail of these kinetic methods is presented in Chapter 2.
15
1.8 Scope of the present work
A comprehensive literature survey has been carried out to identify different research
areas in which the pyrotechnic and propellant research work has been focused in the
recent past especially using the thermal analysis techniques and employing different
kinetic evaluation methods. Detail of the literature review pertaining to different research
areas is given in the introduction section of the respective chapters. Figure 1.3 presents
the road map used to accomplish the present work. The details of the literature survey and
the work done in each specific area will be described chapter wise in the next part of this
thesis; however, a brief and general introduction to these work areas has been discussed
in the following paragraphs.
Figure 1.3 Flow chart showing the road map for the accomplishment of present work
The first part of our research work has been presented as Chapter 3 and it includes the
comparative thermal and kinetic analysis of five different oxidizers that are most
commonly used in various energetic compositions. The investigated oxidizers include
16
ammonium perchlorate (NH4ClO4), ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3), potassium nitrate
(KNO3), barium nitrate Ba(NO3)2 and potassium permanganate (KMnO4). These
oxidizers have been studied by using simultaneous thermal analysis including differential
thermal analysis and thermogravimetery. All the experiments were performed under
identical reaction conditions for better comparison of the results. The thermal
decomposition, phase transformations, kinetics, and the amount of free oxygen provided
by the each oxidizer have been compared. Although, some of the data in this regard has
already been published for individual oxidizers, but the aim here was to compare and
contrast different aspects in one place and under similar conditions [18,19]. It is
important to mention here that the thermal behaviour and the kinetic parameters may be
different under different experimental conditions.
After carrying out the detailed comparison of the various oxidizers, two of them i.e.
barium nitrate and ammonium perchlorate were selected for further investigation and
modification and the work done in this regard has been presented in Chapter 4 of the
thesis. Modified barium nitrate with micro porous structure has been synthesized to
increase the reliability of its ignition as a pyrotechnic oxidant. The motivation for this
work was to promote the use of barium nitrate as a suitable replacement of potassium
chlorate as a pyrotechnic oxidizer. There are different ways to modify the ignition
behaviour of the barium nitrate. One way is to make use of some thermal decomposition
catalyst to sensitize the oxidizer so that it becomes easy to ignite and more reliable when
ignited [20,21]. The method that has been used in the present work is to make use of
some inorganic vesicants for modifying the performance of the oxidizer to increase its
sensitivity and reliability of ignition by creating micro porous structure [22,23]. The
vesicants that have been used for the modification of barium nitrate in this case are
sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), potassium carbonate (K2CO3) and ammonium
perchlorate. The ignition behavior of the pure and the vesicant modified barium nitrate
has been compared by formulating two pyrotechnic mixtures with aluminum fuel and the
results have been reported for the first time.
The catalytic effect of nano sized magnesium oxide (MgO) on the thermal decomposition
and kinetic parameters of ammonium perchlorate (AP) has also been included in Chapter
17
4. The catalytic activity of the nano metal oxides is considered to be better than
conventionally used micro sized particles due to their relatively large surface area
[24,25]. The catalytic effect of MgO on AP decomposition has been reported earlier by
Guorong Duan et al. however, the authors have not carried out the kinetic analysis in
their work [26]. The earlier work reports that the thermal decomposition of AP gets
effected by the addition of different percentages of the catalyst and the two distinct
decomposition stages reduce to a single stage by the addition of 4 percent MgO. Our
work in this regard has been focused to see the changes in the kinetic parameters of the
catalyzed version of AP as compared to the pure one and this aspect has not been
reported in the former work.
The work presented in Chapter 5 describes the results of thermal and kinetic analysis of
pyrotechnic compositions containing magnesium and aluminum fuels. The thermal
stability and reactivity of three pyrotechnic mixtures has been investigated. These are
both very important factors concerning the storage safety and operational reliability of the
pyrotechnics. Metal powders are generally used as pyrotechnic fuels. Magnesium (Mg)
and aluminum (Al) metals are preferred as a fuel in pyrotechnic compositions where a
very high heat and light output is desired. These two effects are most commonly
employed in pyrotechnics that are used as flare and tracer compositions [27,28]. Three
different pyrotechnic mixtures have been formulated by using aluminum and magnesium
as a fuel. The oxidizers that have been used are barium nitrate, potassium permanganate
and ammonium perchlorate. Both the fuel and the oxidizer play an important role in the
combustion of pyrotechnic mixtures and influence their ignition reliability [29]. The fuel
and oxidizer present in the pyrotechnic mixture undergo redox reaction. Thermal analysis
provides a set of powerful tools to investigate such reactions.
The effect of aging i.e. high temperatures and elevated humidity levels on two very
commonly used military pyrotechnics has also been investigated and the results are
presented in Chapter 6. The investigated compositions include SR-524 and SR-562
pyrotechnic compositions. The aging of both the composition was carried out at a
temperature of 70oC and relative humidity of 70 percent for 30 days. The thermal,
kinetic and morphological analysis of fresh and the aged compositions were carried out
18
and the results were compared to identify the changes caused by the aging process. The
thermal behaviour has been studied using simultaneous TG/DTA and the Kissinger
method has been used for evaluation of the kinetic parameters.
Temperature, humidity, thermal shock and impact are amongst the important factors that
influence the performance of the pyrotechnic compositions [30]. The stability of some
materials including pyrotechnics, propellants, polymers etc. is seriously affected by high
temperatures and humidity. The effect of aging on pyrotechnics and propellants,
especially the effect of high temperatures and high humidity, has been investigated by the
researchers in the past as well [31-33].
It is significant to find out different physical and chemical changes caused by the aging
because they may have some undesirable effect on the ignition behaviour of the
pyrotechnic compositions. These changes may result in poor performance of the
pyrotechnics and they may not produce the required output or even fail to ignite [34].
Some of the changes caused by the aging may cause the accidental initiation of
pyrotechnic compositions.
The last part of the thesis describes the in-depth kinetic analysis of composite solid
propellant based on HTPB binder and AP. The three different version of the composite
propellant have been evaluated to check the catalytic effect of magnesium oxide (MgO)
and zinc oxide (ZnO) nano catalysts on the thermal decomposition and kinetic behaviour.
The transition metal oxides are frequently used as catalysts for thermal decomposition of
composite propellants and to improve their performance by increasing their burn rates
[24,35]. The percentage of the catalyst and surface area of the particles are important
factors that influence the catalytic activity [36]. It is reported that nano sized catalysts are
preferred due to their small size and large exposed area and improve the catalytic activity
[37]. The nano catalysts have been characterized by using analytical techniques such
SEM and XRD. The kinetic analysis has been carried out by using four different methods
including Kissinger method, Flynn–Wall–Ozawa method, Friedman method and
Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose method.
The comparison of thermal data and kinetic data parameters was carried out for the
catalyzed and un-catalyzed versions to quantify the effect of catalyst. The differential
19
scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetery (TG) has been used for the thermal
analysis.
References
[1] J. Akhavan, The Chemistry of Explosives, Royal Society of Chemistry, 2004.
[2] M.R. Anvekar, P. Kallolimath, Journal of Aeronautics & Aerospace Engineering
(2013).
[3] J.P. Agrawal, High energy materials: propellants, explosives and pyrotechnics,
John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
[4] S.G. Hosseini, A. Eslami, Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry 101 (2010)
1111.
[5] M. Sovizi, S. Hajimirsadeghi, B. Naderizadeh, Journal of hazardous materials 168
(2009) 1134.
[6] M. Fathollahi, S. Pourmortazavi, S. Hosseini, Combustion and flame 138 (2004)
304.
[7] M. Fathollahi, S. Pourmortazavi, S. Hosseini, Journal of Energetic Materials 26
(2007) 52.
[8] G.P. Sutton, O. Biblarz, Rocket propulsion elements, John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
[9] D.K. Huzel, D.H. Huang, Modern engineering for design of liquid-propellant
rocket engines, AiAA, 1992.
[10] S. Pundlik, R. Palaiah, J. Nair, T. Mukundan, S. Singh, H. Singh, Journal of
Energetic Materials 19 (2001) 339.
[11] K. Raman, H. Singh, Propellants, explosives, pyrotechnics 13 (1988) 149.
[12] G. Gore, K. Tipare, R. Bhatewara, U. Prasad, M. Gupta, S. Mane, Defence
Science Journal 49 (2013) 151.
[13] S. Banerjee, S. Chakravarthy, Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves 43
(2007) 435.
[14] K. Selim, S. Özkar, L. Yilmaz, Journal of applied polymer science 77 (2000) 538.
[15] S. Danali, R. Palaiah, K. Raha, Defence Science Journal 60 (2010) 152.
[16] M. Brown, Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry 65 (2001) 323.
20
[17] S. Pourmortazavi, S. Hajimirsadeghi, I. Kohsari, M. Fathollahi, S. Hosseini, Fuel
87 (2008) 244.
[18] R. Gunawan, D. Zhang, Journal of hazardous materials 165 (2009) 751.
[19] M. Zou, X. Jiang, L. Lu, X. Wang, Journal of hazardous materials 225 (2012)
124.
[20] M. Song, M. Chen, Z. Zhang, Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 33 (2008)
261.
[21] A.A. Vargeese, K. Muralidharan, Applied Catalysis A: General 447 (2012) 171.
[22] Z.-h. MEI, G.-y. ZENG, H. QIAN, C.-x. Lü, Chinese Journal of Energetic
Materials 1 (2011) 008.
[23] X. Zhang, X. Chen, M.H. Feng, Z.F. Zheng, G.P. Pan, H.P. Lv, Advanced
Materials Research 550 (2012) 27.
[24] P.R. Patil, V.e.N. Krishnamurthy, S.S. Joshi, Propellants, Explosives,
Pyrotechnics 33 (2008) 266.
[25] I.P.S. Kapoor, P. Srivastava, G. Singh, Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 34
(2009) 351.
[26] G. Duan, X. Yang, J. Chen, G. Huang, L. Lu, X. Wang, Powder technology 172
(2007) 27.
[27] C. Lăzăroaie, S. Eşanu, C. Său, R. Petre, P.-Z. Iordache, G. Staikos, T. Rotariu, T.
Zecheru, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 115 (2014) 1407.
[28] J.J. Granier, M.L. Pantoya, Combustion and Flame 138 (2004) 373.
[29] S.G. Hosseini, S.M. Pourmortazavi, S.S. Hajimirsadeghi, Combustion and flame
141 (2005) 322.
[30] L. Wang, X. Shi, W. Wang, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 117
(2014) 985.
[31] W. de Klerk, E. Krabbendam-LaHaye, B. Berger, H. Brechbuhl, C. Popescu,
Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry 80 (2005) 529.
[32] D. Sorensen, A. Quebral, E. Baroody, W. Sanborn, Journal of thermal analysis
and calorimetry 85 (2006) 151.
[33] M.D. Judge, Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 28 (2003) 114.
21
[34] S. Brown, E.L. Charsley, S. Goodall, P.G. Laye, J.J. Rooney, T.T. Griffiths,
Thermochimica acta 401 (2003) 53.
[35] P.R. Patil, V.e.N. Krishnamurthy, S.S. Joshi, Propellants, Explosives,
Pyrotechnics 31 (2006) 442.
[36] K. Kishore, V.P. Verneker, M. Sunitha, AIAA Journal 15 (1977) 1649.
[37] S. Chaturvedi, P.N. Dave, Journal of Saudi Chemical Society 17 (2013) 135.
22
Chapter 2
Experimental Techniques, Materials and
Methods
2.1 Experimental Techniques
Thermal analysis has been used mostly for the conduct of the present work. It is an
effective technique for investigating energetic materials including propellant and
pyrotechnics. The thermal data is very useful for the evaluation of the kinetic parameters.
Different analytical techniques that have been used for the accomplishment of this work
are listed below:
1. Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA).
2. Thermogravimetery (TG).
3. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC).
4. X-ray Diffraction (XRD).
5. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM).
6. Particle Size Analysis (PSA)
2.1.1 Thermal analysis
It is one of the most widely used techniques for the investigation of energetic materials
primarily because the analysis requires very minute quantity of the sample making it
safe for the analysis of explosives, propellants and pyrotechnics [1-3]. The changes in
the physical and chemical properties of the material are observed by exposing it to high
temperatures. The material temperature is raised in a systematic and controlled manner.
23
For this purpose, both the sample and an inert reference are heated together and the
temperature difference between them is monitored. The methods of thermal analysis are
not limited to explosives rather they can be used for the investigation of a wide variety
of materials. The behaviour of pure compounds and different mixtures is studied by
thermal analysis. The analysis provides some meaningful data such as melting points,
boing points, solid state phase transformations, decomposition temperatures and glass
transition temperatures. Different events are identified as exothermic or endothermic in
nature by measuring the heat flow. Moreover, the main strength of these methods is their
ability to provide information regarding the kinetic parameters such as activation energy,
frequency factor and rate of reaction. The thermal analysis finds application in many
fields including the following:
1. Characterization of different polymers [4].
2. Investigation of energetic materials.
3. Pharmaceutical drug development [5].
4. Evaluation of soils [6].
5. Study of thermal properties of foods [7].
2.1.2 Different methods for thermal analysis
Thermal analysis refers to a broad analytical technique and it includes many different
methods. Each method is based on the measurement of some specific properties of the
material with respect to the variation in the sample temperature. Some of the methods of
the thermal analysis are described below [8].
Differential Thermal Analysis
This method measures the temperature difference between the sample and the inert
reference.
Thermogravimetery
The method measures mass loss or mass gain in the sample as a consequence of
heating.
24
Differential Scanning Calorimetry
It measures the difference in the heat flow of the sample and the inert reference
material.
Thermo Mechanical Analysis
It is an important thermal method by which the mechanical properties of materials
are measured.
Dynamic Mechanical Analysis
It measures the properties such as mechanical stiffness and damping.
Thermomagnetometry
The magnetic properties of materials are measured in this method.
Thermoparticulate Analysis
The evolution of particles is measured with this method of thermal analysis.
It is obvious that all these methods provide a powerful set of tools to analyze different
material properties. The choice of any specific method depends upon the type of the
material being investigated and the information required. Thermal methods including
Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA), Thermogravimetery (TG) and Differential
Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) have been used in the present work and are discussed in
detail.
2.1.3 Differential Scanning calorimetry (DSC)
DSC is an analytical technique that is used to investigate different thermal events such
as decomposition temperatures, phase transformations, melting and boiling points and
for subsequent processing of the thermal data for kinetic evaluation. It is commonly used
for the thermal cum kinetic analysis of energetic materials including explosives,
25
propellants and pyrotechnics [9-11]. The thermal stability and reactivity of energetic
materials are two important aspects concerning the safety and reliability of the energetic
compositions. DSC provides a very safe and effective method for the study of such
compositions. In the present work, DSC has been used to carry out the thermal studies of
different versions of composite propellant at multiple heating rates. The obtained
experimental results have been used to calculate the kinetic parameters using the
Kissinger method. The DSC instrument by Mettler Toledo model number DSC823e has
been used in the present work and it is shown in Figure 2.1.
Figure 2.1 DSC Instrument model number DSC823e
The DSC is used to measure the difference in the heat flow of an inert reference and the
material under investigation. Both the sample and reference are simultaneously
subjected to a common heating program and under exactly similar experimental
conditions. The principle of operation in this technique is to keep both the reference and
the sample material at the same temperature while they are being heated at some
required heating rate. The amount of energy supplied to keep the reference and the
sample at the same temperature is then plotted against the temperature or time. When the
26
sample undergoes some physical or chemical change, the heat is either evolved
(exothermic change) or the heat is absorbed (endothermic change); the heat flow is
adjusted accordingly.
There are two distinct sensors in the DSC instrument that are used for the sample and the
reference separately. Two identical pans are used for the sample and the reference and
the reference pan is generally kept empty. Some inert gas is also used for the conduct of
experiments unless the experiment is intentionally designed to be conducted in the air or
some other reactive atmosphere.
2.1.4 Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA)
This technique is quite similar to the DSC; however, it mainly differs from DSC in its
operational mechanism. The sample and the reference are both subjected to a same
heating program and the difference in the temperature between the sample and the
reference is then measured and plotted against temperature. The DTA is also very
powerful analytical method and is used to investigate the changes such as melting,
decomposition, solid state phase transformations, glass transitions, crystallization,
sublimation etc. [12-14]. The DTA has been extensively used to carry out the present
work. It has been used for the thermal analysis of various oxidizers used in the field of
propellants and pyrotechnics. It has been used for the thermal cum kinetic analysis of
different pyrotechnic compositions and their ingredients. The changes caused by the
aging process to some commonly used military pyrotechnics related to their thermal
stability and kinetic parameters have been identified on the basis of the experimental
results obtained from DTA. The Diamond TG/DTA instrument manufactured by Perkin
Elmer has been used in this work and shown in Figure 2.2.
It is pertinent to mention here that the reference material has a strong influence on the
experimental results of the DTA and therefore it should have the following properties.
It should be thermally inert during the entire course of heating and cooling.
There should be no reaction between the reference material and any other
hardware component like pan holders and thermocouples.
27
The most popular choices of the reference material for the analysis of inorganic
materials are alumina and carborundum. There are some other important factors as well
that bear an effect on the results of the DTA. These factors may be either sample related
or instrument related.
Figure 2.2 The diamond TG/DTA Instrument
Factors related to the sample
Nature and the characteristics of the sample are considered to effect the DTA curve.
These factors include but are not limited to:
The mass of the sample
The size of sample particles
Heat capacity and the thermal conductivity of the sample
The packing density of the sample
Swelling/shrinking of the sample
28
Factors related to the instrument
Sample heating rate
Material of the sample holding pan
Geometry of the sample holding pan
The reaction atmosphere
Type of the furnace used for heating
Position of thermocouple related to the sample
The response and specifications of the instrument
It would not be out of place to mention here that the similar factors also influence the
experimental results of TG and DSC.
2.1.5 Thermogravimetery (TG)
Thermogravimetery (TG) or the thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) is one of the most
important methods of the thermal analysis. The mass gain or the mass loss of the sample
is measured in this technique when the sample is systematically heated in a controlled
manner. There are materials that may lose weight on heating due to some physical or
chemical change occurring at high temperatures e.g. decomposition of the sample and
liberation of the gaseous products will cause the sample to lose its mass. Similarly, the
sample can gain mass at higher temperatures due to reaction with the surrounding
atmosphere and the typical example of such a case is the oxidation of metals in the air
atmosphere. It is pertinent to mention here that both the mass loss and mass gain provide
significant information concerning the sample.
The technique is very useful to determine the changes in mass of a sample and then
correlating those changes with the chemistry of the material to identify the thermal
events that have taken place in some specified temperature range. It provides vital
information regarding the thermal decomposition and stability of the material under
investigation in the form of mass vs. temperature curve. It finds extensive utilization in
29
the field of energetic materials [15-17]. It has been widely used in the present work for
the thermal and kinetic evaluation of propellants/pyrotechnics and their ingredients.
Measurement principle of TG
There are two beams i.e. sample and reference beams that are supported by the driving
coils. Whenever there is some change in the mass of the sample, it is detected by an
optical position sensor with the help of a reference slit. The balance circuit reception
signals from the optical sensor and it supplies feedback current to the driving coils so that
the slit returns to its original position. Since the feedback current supplied by the balance
circuit is proportional to mass gain or mass loss of the sample, therefore the change in
mass of the sample with respect to a reference is detected. Some of the main components
of the TG system are visible in Figure 2.3.
Figure 2.3 Main components of the TG system
2.1.6 X-ray diffraction (XRD)
X-ray diffraction is a commonly used technique for finding the atomic or molecular
structure of crystalline materials. The incident X-rays are scattered in different
30
directions due to interaction with the atoms present inside the material. The scattered X-
rays may undergo either constructive or destructive interference. For the constructive
interference, the diffraction of x-rays is described by the Bragg‟s law:
nλ = 2dsinθ
Where, n is an integer, λ represents the wavelength of incident X-rays, d is the spacing
between the planes and θ represents the angle between the incident X-rays and set of the
crystal planes.
The x-rays are electromagnetic radiations having their wavelength in the range of 0.5-
2.5 Ao. This range of the wavelength makes them very suitable for identifying the crystal
structure at atomic level. It is no doubt one of the most powerful characterization tools
being used in a variety of disciplines including material science and solid state
chemistry. It is also used by researchers working in the field of energetic materials [18-
20]. We have used this technique for the characterization of micro porous barium nitrate,
identification of the residue after thermal decomposition and for investigating the
reaction products of aging. In the present study, XRD instrument manufactured by
STOE, Germany has been used. The main components of this instrument are shown in
Figure 2.4.
Figure 2.4 Main components of the XRD instrument
31
The basic components of the XRD instrument are listed below:
1. X-ray source (Monochromatic)
2. The sample holder
3. Data collector (scintillation counter in this case)
4. The x-rays used in this case are Cu Kα.
The following important information can be obtained from the XRD analysis of a
material.
Identification of phase composition
Determination of unit cell lattice parameters
Crystal structure
Texture/orientation
Crystallite size
2.1.7 Scanning electron Microscopy (SEM)
It is an electron microscope that makes use of a focused beam of electrons to scan the
sample. The electrons beam interacts with the sample and generates some signals that are
used to get the information regarding the composition and structure of the investigated
samples. The scanning electron microscope is far more superior in performance than the
ordinary microscope. It can achieve a resolution of less than one nanometer due to very
short wavelength of the electrons. The wavelength of the white light is relatively very
high as compared to the electrons. The high wavelength is a limitation due to which the
resolution of the modern microscope is not more than 250nm.
The scanning electron microscopy is a versatile technique and being used around the
globe by researchers working in many areas of science and technology [21,22]. The
technique has been used in the present work for the characterization of nano particles,
investigation of porous structures and for identification of effects of aging on the
morphology and surface features of the pyrotechnic compositions. The scanning electron
32
microscope model number JSM- 6490 LA manufactured by JEOL, Japan has been used
in this work and shown in Figure 2.5
Figure 2.5 Scanning electron microscope JSM- 6490 LA
2.1.8 Particle size analysis (PSA)
It is an analytical technique which is used to measure the particle size distribution of both
the powders and liquids. There are numerous methods by which the particle size analysis
is carried out. The particle size is known to play important role in different applications in
the field of chemical engineering, materials engineering, reaction kinetics, agriculture and
mining and many more. In all the above mentioned fields, there are application specific
reasons due to which the particle size measurement is considered important. The particle
size distributions are reported as means, medians or modes depending on the nature of
distribution and the information required to be presented. In the present work, laser
scattering particle size distribution analyzer (LA-920 by HORIBA) was used for the
particle size analysis of metal powders that were subsequently used as fuels in the
pyrotechnic formulations. The particle size analyzer used in this work is shown in Figure
33
2.6. The technique is often used by the researchers working in the field of energetic
materials to specify the particle size distribution of sample.
Figure 2.6 Particle size distribution analyzer LA-920
2.2 Materials Used
2.2.1 Oxidizers
Analytical grade potassium nitrate, ammonium nitrate, potassium permanganate,
barium nitrate, and defense grade ammonium perchlorate with high purity have been
used for this analysis. Due to high purity level of the compounds, no further purification
was carried out. Ammonium nitrate and potassium nitrate used in this work were
purchased from Merck. Barium nitrate and potassium permanganate were purchased
from Scharlau (Spain) and ammonium perchlorate was supplied by National
Development Complex of Pakistan. All these oxidizer were ground finely and sieved
through a 300 mesh before the analysis. For the comparison purpose, the reaction
conditions of all the experiments conducted on these oxidizers were kept same. The
sample mass was kept as 10 mg and the heating rate of 10ºC/min was used. Nitrogen
gas was used to provide the inert atmosphere during the conduct of experiments.
34
2.2.2 Fuels
Analytical grade magnesium powder and aluminum powder were purchased from
Scharlau (Spain) for the present work. The average particle size of the aluminum and
magnesium powder was nearly 20µm and 24µm respectively. Laser scattering particle
size distribution analyzer LA-920 by HORIBA was used for the analysis. The sample
mass of 3 mg was used to study the oxidation of these fuels in the air atmosphere. The
heating rate of 10ºC/min was used. The experiments were carried out in the air
atmosphere to monitor the oxidation process of the metal powders. The thermal
behaviour and oxidation process was investigated by using thermogravimetery.
2.2.3 Pyrotechnic Compositions
The pyrotechnic compositions investigated in the present work include pyrotechnic
mixtures prepared by us by mixing stoichiometric fuel oxidizer ratios and some
commonly used military pyrotechnic compositions purchased from Pakistan Ordnance
Factories. The detailed composition of all these pyrotechnic mixtures/compositions is
given below. Table 2.1 represents the fuel to oxidant ratio of the pyrotechnic mixtures
containing aluminum and magnesium fuel.
Table 2.1 The mass ratio of fuel and oxidizer in pyrotechnic mixtures
The military pyrotechnic compositions investigated in the present work and the mass
ratio of their ingredients is shown below.
S. No Fuel Oxidizer Mass Ratio
1 Aluminum Barium Nitrate 17/83
2 Magnesium Ammonium perchlorate 34/66
3 Magnesium Potassium permanganate 18/82
35
SR 524 Pyrotechnic composition
The composition is mainly based on magnesium fuel and sodium nitrate oxidizer. It is
used as a flash mixture for military applications. The exact composition of the ingredients
is given below:
Magnesium 58%
Sodium Nitrate 38%
Boiled Linseed Oil 4%
SR 562 Pyrotechnic composition
The other military composition that has been investigated in this work is SR-562. It is
used as a flare in military applications. The exact composition of the ingredients is given
below:
Magnesium 50%
Calcium oxalate 11%
Sodium Nitrate 35%
Lithographic varnish 4%
2.2.4 Composite solid propellant compositions
The composite solid propellant based on HTPB binder fuel and ammonium perchlorate
oxidizer has been investigated in this work. The propellant was manufactured by National
Development Complex, Pakistan and the specifications are given below:
Composition 1
HTPB binder fuel 15%
Ammonium perchlorate 80%
Miscellaneous additives 5%
36
Composition 2 and 3
The propellant composition 2 and 3 are similar to composition 1 except that they have
been catalyzed with two percent of nano magnesium oxide and nano zinc oxide
respectively.
2.3 Kinetic evaluation methods.
2.3.1 Importance of Kinetics for solid state reactions
Investigation of the kinetic behaviour in solid state reactions provides a useful insight
into these processes. The thermal and kinetic evaluation of energetic materials is essential
to assess their reactivity and thermal stability. The TG, DTA and DSC data obtained
under non-isothermal conditions can be used to evaluate the kinetic parameters. The
information pertaining to the reaction kinetics of the energetic materials is important in
many aspects. The kinetic data not only describes the reaction pathway but also helpful in
determining the stability and compatibility of the energetic compositions. The thermal,
kinetic and stability parameters are indeed very helpful in the manufacturing process for
the formulation of new compositions and for estimating the safety aspects during storage,
handling and operation. Thermal methods such as TG, DTA and DSC are versatile
methods for studying the thermal decomposition and kinetics of a wide variety of
materials including energetic materials. A variety of kinetic methods based on thermal
data have been developed and used for evaluation of different materials. The main
strength of the kinetic methods based on thermal analysis is that both the analytical data
and kinetic parameters are obtained from the same experiments and in a relatively shorter
time.
Broadly speaking, there are two types of kinetic methods based on the non-isothermal
kinetic data, i.e., they are either based on single heating rate experiment or the multiple
heating rate experiments. The non-isothermal methods offer several advantages over the
conventional isothermal methods [23,24]. Some of these are:
(a) These methods provide easy and rapid temperature scan of the material over
the desired range of temperature.
37
(b) The kinetic evaluation is continuous in the temperature range of interest.
(c) The isothermal methods have a non-isothermal part as well. The sample is
required to be raised to the desired temperature non-isothermally and the
sample may undergo some reaction during this time. There is no such issue in
non-isothermal methods.
(d) These methods require less experimental data and shorter time. Although,
multiple heating rates are preferred, however, the kinetics can be calculated
even from a single heating rate experiment.
The non-isothermal methods of kinetic analysis have been used in the present work.
There are six different kinetic methods including the three isoconversional methods that
have been used. These methods include:
(a) Kissinger method
(b) Ozawa method
(c) Horowitz and Metzger method
(d) Friedman method
(e) Flynn–Wall–Ozawa method
(f) Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose method
2.3.2 Kissinger method
The Kissinger method has been extensively used in the present work for non-isothermal
kinetic evaluation of different pyrotechnic mixtures and composite propellant
compositions. A brief description of the Kissinger method is presented below. Starting
from the following equation:
⁄ (2.1)
In this equation (1), “α” presents conversion degree, “β” is the heating rate, “A”
represents the frequency factor or pre exponential factor, “E” is the activation energy,
“n” is the reaction order and “R” represents the gas constant.
38
∫
∫ (
)
(2.2)
(2.3)
Kissinger has proposed different ways to calculate the kinetic parameters by using the
thermal data [25].
(
)
(2.4)
In equation (2.4), is the peak temperature, is the heating rate, “A” represents
frequency factor, “R” is the gas constant, “T” represents sample temperature, “n”
represents reaction order and “E” represents activation energy in kJ/mol . For reaction
order other than one, the kinetic parameters can be calculated from equation (2.5)
[26,27].
(
) (
)
(2.5)
The above equation means that the energy of activation can be calculated from (
)
and
without changing the reaction order. The slope of the line obtained by plotting
above mentioned graph gives the value of activation energy. When the “E” has been
calculated, the frequency factor can be calculated by using equation (2.6) given below
[28,29].
[ (
)]
(2.6)
39
And when both E and A are known, the reaction rate constant can be found by using the
famous Arrhenius equation.
k = A (
) (2.7)
An important thermodynamic parameter known as the enthalpy of activation can also be
calculated using activation energy value and employing the under mentioned relationship
[30].
(2.8)
2.3.3 Ozawa Method
Another kinetic evaluation method used in the present work is the Ozawa method. This
method is based on the assumption that for any heat flow curve, the degree of reaction is
independent of the heating rate at the peak temperature (Tp). The final equation of the
Ozawa method is given below.
(
( )) (
) (2.9)
Experiments are performed at multiple heating rates and the peak temperatures are
determined in each case. In this method, kinetic plot of log β is plotted against reciprocal
peak temperature. The slop of the resulting plot is then used to determine the value of
activation energy using the following relationship.
Ea = - 2.19 R (d log β/ d Tp-1
) (2.10)
In equation (2.10), “Ea” is the activation energy in kJ/mol, “β” is the heating rate and “Tp”
is the peak temperature corresponding to a specific heating rate and “R” is the universal
gas constant. After calculating the activation energy, the frequency factor can be
40
determined from the intercept of the log β axis. For majority of kinetic models, ( ) 1
and this assumption enable the determination of A from the intercept [31]. The rate
constant is then determined using equation (2.7) described previously.
2.3.4 Horowitz and Metzger Method
The main strength of this method is that it affords to calculate the activation energy by a
single heating rate experiment. We have used this method sparingly in the present work
and most of the kinetic calculations have been done by multiple heating rate experiments.
The method has been briefly discussed in the following paragraphs.
First of all, a reference temperature is determined and it is denoted as Ts. This is the
temperature where the rate of decomposition is the maximum. The reference is calculated
from the TG data by the relationship given below.
Ts = Wt / Wo = 1/e (2.11)
Where, “Ts” is the reference temperature, “Wt” is the weight of the sample at any given
temperature T, “Wo” is the total initial weight of the sample and “e” is the exponential.
When the reference temperature is known, the temperature difference ө (theta) is
calculated by using equation (12)
ө = T- Ts (2.12)
Where, “T” is the sample temperature at any weight “Wt”. The “ө” is then plotted against
lnln Wo/ Wt. The gradient or the slop of a nearly straight line obtained from the above
graph gives the value of activation energy[32].
Ea = Slop 2.303(RTs2) (2.13)
Where, Ea is the activation energy and R is the Universal Gas Constant and Ts is the
reference temperature.
41
2.3.5 Flynn–Wall–Ozawa Method
Three isoconversional methods have been used in this work to carry out the thorough
kinetic evaluation of the composite solid propellant. These methods allow the calculation
of activation energy at several degrees of conversion and the variation of activation
energy can be found as the reaction proceeds. The methods are not very specific and are
suitable for the kinetic investigation of variety of materials. They offer model free
calculation of activation energies corresponding to different degrees of conversion. The
Flynn-Wall-Ozawa method is an integral kinetic method. The method assumes that the
kinetic equation follows the Arrhenius behaviour and the calculations have been
simplified by using the famous Doyle approximation [33]. The final and simplified form
of the Flynn Wall Ozawa method is given in equation (2.14).
(
) (
) (2.14)
Where, “β” represents heating rate at which the experiment was conducted , “A” is the
pre- exponential factor commonly known as the frequency factor , “α” represents the
degree of conversion, “E” is the energy of activation and “R” is the universal constant.
Multiple heating rate experiments are required to plot the kinetic graph of
versus lnβ
for different degree of conversion of conversion (α). The gradient of the above mentioned
graph can be used to calculate “E” for each degree of conversion.
2.3.6 Friedman Method
Friedman proposed a kinetic evaluation method and it is very popular amongst the
researchers working in the field of energetic materials. It is a differential method that
enables model free kinetic evaluations. It provides a large amount of activation energy
data at several degrees of the conversion [34]. The Friedman method of kinetic evaluation
and its final equation has been presented in equation (2.15).
42
(
) [ ]
(2.15)
Where, “β” represents the heating rates used for carrying out the experiments, “α” is
conversion degree of the sample, “A” is the frequency factor, “E” represent the activation
energy and “R” is the gas constant.
It is clear from equation (2.15) that the plots of (
) versus the reciprocal
temperatures at different heating rates are required to determine the value of activation
energy corresponding to different degree of conversion.
2.3.6 Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose Method
The Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose method is somewhat similar to the original Kissinger
method; however, the main difference between the two methods is the value of
temperatures used in the kinetic evaluation. Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose method uses the
sample temperatures corresponding to each degree of conversion α (Tα) instead of peak
temperatures (Tp) used in the basic Kissinger method. The Coats-Redfern approximation
concerning temperature integral has been used to simplify this method [35]. The method
has been described below in equation (2.16).
(
) (
)
(2.16)
Where, is the temperature corresponding to conversion (α) , represents
multiple heating rates used during the experiments , “E” denotes the activation energy ,
“A” denotes pre-exponential factor and “R” is the gas constant.
References
[1] D. Ouyang, G. Pan, H. Guan, C. Zhu, X. Chen, Thermochimica Acta 513 (2011)
119.
[2] P.R. Patil, V.e.N. Krishnamurthy, S.S. Joshi, Propellants, Explosives,
Pyrotechnics 31 (2006) 442.
[3] L.Liu, G. He, Y. Wang, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 114 (2013)
1057.
43
[4] M.P. Sepe, Thermal analysis of polymers, iSmithers Rapra Publishing, 1997.
[5] D. Giron, Journal of thermal analysis and Calorimetry 68 (2002) 335.
[6] A.F. Plante, J.M. Fernández, J. Leifeld, Geoderma 153 (2009) 1.
[7] Y. Roos, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 71 (2003) 197.
[8] M.E. Brown, Introduction to thermal analysis: techniques and applications,
Springer, 2001.
[9] B. Berger, A. Brammer, E. Charsley, J. Rooney, S. Wirrington, Journal of
Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 49 (1997) 1327.
[10] J.-S. Lee, C.-K. Hsu, C.-L. Chang, Thermochimica Acta 392 (2002) 173.
[11] R. Sivabalan, M. Talawar, N. Senthilkumar, B. Kavitha, S. Asthana, Journal of
thermal analysis and calorimetry 78 (2004) 781.
[12] H.-H. Licht, Propellants Explosives Pyrotechnics 25 (2000) 126.
[13] Z. Ma, F. Li, H. Bai, Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 31 (2006) 447.
[14] S. Pourmortazavi, M. Fathollahi, S. Hajimirsadeghi, S. Hosseini, Thermochimica
acta 443 (2006) 129.
[15] X. Kang, J. Zhang, Q. Zhang, K. Du, Y. Tang, Journal of thermal analysis and
calorimetry 109 (2012) 1333.
[16] J. Luman, B. Wehrman, K. Kuo, R. Yetter, N. Masoud, T. Manning, L. Harris, H.
Bruck, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 31 (2007) 2089.
[17] Q.S. Kwok, R.C. Fouchard, A.M. Turcotte, P.D. Lightfoot, R. Bowes, D.E. Jones,
Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 27 (2002) 229.
[18] G. Harding, A. Harding, Counterterrorist Detection Techniques of Explosives
(2007) 199.
[19] L. Meda, G. Marra, L. Galfetti, F. Severini, L. De Luca, Materials Science and
Engineering: C 27 (2007) 1393.
[20] S.H. Ba, Z. Zhang, M.H. Yan, Z.X. Sun, X.P. Teng, Applied Mechanics and
Materials 217 (2012) 669.
[21] R.C. Dujay, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Pyrotechnics:(and Related Subjects)-
B&W 11 (2012) 27.
[22] J.R. Verkouteren, Journal of forensic sciences 52 (2007) 335.
[23] S. Maitra, S. Mukherjee, N. Saha, J. Pramanik, Cerâmica 53 (2007) 284.
44
[24] S. Vyazovkin, C.A. Wight, International Reviews in Physical Chemistry 17
(1998) 407.
[25] H.E. Kissinger, Analytical chemistry 29 (1957) 1702.
[26] B. Lehmann, J. Karger-Kocsis, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 95
(2009) 221.
[27] T. Hatakeyama, F. Quinn, Thermal Analysis (1994).
[28] S. Vyazovkin, C.A. Wight, Thermochimica acta 340 (1999) 53.
[29] M. Sunitha, C. Reghunadhan Nair, K. Krishnan, K. Ninan, Thermochimica acta
374 (2001) 159.
[30] S. Pourmortazavi, S. Hajimirsadeghi, I. Kohsari, M. Fathollahi, S. Hosseini, Fuel
87 (2008) 244.
[31] B. Janković, M. Marinović-Cincović, M.D. Dramićanin, (2013).
[32] M. Kok, R. Pamir, Oil Shale 20 (2003) 57.
[33] T. Vlase, G. Vlase, N. Birta, N. Doca, Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry
88 (2007) 631.
[34] M. Venkatesh, P. Ravi, S.P. Tewari, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 117
(2013) 10162.
[35] B. Janković, Chemical Engineering Journal 139 (2008) 128.
45
Chapter 3
Thermal and kinetic comparison of
commonly used oxidizers
3.1 Introduction
Oxidizers are usually oxygen rich compounds which are used to provide oxygen for the
burning/ignition of the fuel in various energetic formulations including pyrotechnic and
propellant compositions [1]. The nature of the oxidizer and its oxygen balance play
important role during the ignition of energetic compositions. Composite solid propellants
and pyrotechnic compositions utilize a large quantity of oxidizers [2-4]. These are
generally inorganic solids and the commonly used oxidizers are chlorates, perchlorates,
nitrates, chromates etc. Pyrotechnic compositions mainly comprise fuel and oxidizer and
a small amount some of other additives. They produce some special effects after they are
properly ignited and the effects include the production of heat, light, sound and smoke.
The pyrotechnics are heterogeneous mixture of fuel and oxidizer and they may be either
inorganic or organic in nature [5].
The thermal behaviour and kinetics of the oxidizer has a strong influence on the thermal
decomposition and the ignition of the propellants as well pyrotechnics [6]. It is therefore
considered essential to investigate the thermal cum kinetic behaviour of the oxidizer
before it is used in any energetic composition. The present work describes the thermal,
kinetic and parametric comparison of five oxidizers that are commonly used in various
pyrotechnic and propellant compositions. These investigated oxidizers include
ammonium perchlorate, ammonium nitrate, barium nitrate, potassium nitrate and
46
potassium permanganate. In the reported literature, most of these oxidizers have been
investigated individually. However, the focus in the present work was to carry out the
thermal and kinetic analysis of all these oxidizer under exactly similar reaction conditions
so that the comparisons are realistic and conclusions are meaningful. The reaction
conditions bear an effect on the experimental results in the field of thermal analysis and
the results may be different under different conditions. Therefore, it has been considered
essential to carry out the thermal cum kinetic investigation of these oxidizers afresh and
under identical reaction conditions.
Ammonium perchlorate has been extensively used as an oxidizer for composite
propellants and it is still very popular [7]. An extremely large quantity of this oxidizer is
utilized in the propellants that are used for the space shuttles [8]. The thermal behaviour
and kinetic parameters of ammonium perchlorate have been investigated by many
researchers working in the field of energetic materials [9-11]. Ammonium nitrate finds
use in both the military and commercial applications. It is used in mining operations as an
industrial explosive and the composition is generally known as ammonium nitrate fuel oil
mixture (ANFO) [12]. The main advantage of this oxidizer is that its decomposition
products are chlorine free and therefore it is considered to be a clean oxidizer. With the
increasing concern for the protection of environment the work is now being focused to
develop eco-friendly energetic composition [13]. Potassium permanganate has also been
used in wide variety of pyrotechnic compositions such as antimony/ potassium
permanganate [14]. Potassium nitrate is frequently used in various formulations and
considered to be safe as well. Moreover, it can also produce colored flame compositions.
Barium nitrate is an important oxidizer which is used in various pyrotechnic and
explosive formulations [15]. It is used for the production of green colours in different
pyrotechnics. It is also used as an additive in the thermite compositions. It is also used in
combination with TNT to make an explosive composition known as the “Baratol”.
However, it suffers from the difficulty of ignition and some work has been reported to
eliminate this drawback [16].
The investigation of thermal decomposition of the oxidizers is important to determine the
decomposition temperatures and evaluation of kinetic parameters. Activation energy is
47
perhaps the most important parameter in this regard to find out the amount of energy that
is required to be supplied to decompose any specific oxidizer. The non-isothermal
temperature scan of the oxidizer gives valuable information regarding its melting,
decomposition and the solid state phase transformations. These phase changes are very
important in determining the thermal stability. The phase changes are often associated
with the volume change due to the changes in the crystal structure.
Therefore, all the five oxidizers have been investigated by simultaneous thermal analysis
to determine the thermal events that take place until the oxidizer is finally decomposed.
The results have been compared on the basis of different parameters such as the
decomposition temperature, activation energy, phase transformations and the oxidizing
ability of the oxidizers. Most of the above mentioned oxidizers have been used in
different pyrotechnic/propellant compositions investigated in the subsequent chapters. It
is therefore necessary that the thermal and kinetic behaviour of these oxidizers is known
before they are added to different fuels to make energetic compositions. The knowledge
about different parameters of the oxidizers investigated in the present work has helped in
carrying out the main work concerning different aspects of pyrotechnics/propellants.
Simultaneous Thermal Analysis (STA) has been used to carry out the work presented in
this chapter. This method of thermal analysis is used to observe the physical or chemical
changes in the sample when it is systematically heated as per the temperature program
[17]. Thermal Analysis is being widely used by researchers around the globe for analysis
of all kinds of materials including energetic materials [18-22]. The experimental data has
been used to calculate the kinetic parameters by using Horowitz and Metzger method for
this part of the work. The main strength of this method is that it affords to determine the
activation energy in a single heating rate experiment.
3.2 Experimental Conditions
The information regarding the source from where these oxidizers were purchased has
already been described in detail in chapter 2 and therefore only the experimental
conditions have been discussed here. Simultaneous Thermal Analysis (STA) including
Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA) and Thermogravimetery (TG) has been used to
48
accomplish the work presented in this chapter. The sample mass in each case was kept
close to 10 mg and all the experiments were conducted at a heating rate of 10ºC to ensure
better comparison of results. The thermal behavior of all the five oxidizers was analyzed
to identify different thermal events such as melting, decomposition and phase
transformation. For this purpose, the samples were subjected to a thermal scan from room
temperature to the temperature where the decomposition of the sample takes place. The
experimental data obtained by thermogravimetery (TG) has been processed to calculate
the activation energy of all the oxidizers by using Horowitz and Metzger Method. The
kinetic computations have been carried out by using curve fitting software based on the
Horowitz and Metzger method to obtain the kinetic parameters of all the oxidizers.
The reaction atmosphere interferes with the sample and therefore the results may be
affected. Therefore, the nitrogen gas has been used to provide an inert atmosphere during
all the experiments. The flow rate of the nitrogen was maintained at 100ml/min till
completion of the experiment in each case. The crucibles made up of aluminum metal
were used to hold the sample and as a reference material for ammonium perchlorate,
ammonium nitrate and potassium permanganate. The alumina crucibles were used for the
analysis of barium nitrate and potassium nitrate. It is re-emphasized here that the sample
mass, heating rate and the nitrogen gas flow rate was kept same during the conduct of all
experiments for better comparison of results. The Diamond TG/DTA instrument by
Perkin Elmer has been used for the conduct of experimental work reported in this
chapter. The technique is also known as simultaneous thermal analysis because a single
sample is subjected to TG and DTA in the same experiment.
3.3 Thermal and kinetic behaviour of Ammonium Perchlorate
The investigation of the thermal behavior of ammonium perchlorate has been carried out
to monitor the thermal events including its decomposition. The DTA curve of ammonium
perchlorate shows three distinct peaks. Two peaks are exothermic and one peak is
endothermic in nature as shown in Figure 3.1. The first peak in the DTA curve is
endothermic and it appears at a temperature of approximately 242ºC. It represents the
solid state phase transformation of ammonium perchlorate and the crystal structure of the
49
AP changes from orthorhombic to cubic due to this phase change [23]. The ammonium
perchlorate after this phase change is generally called as cubic AP. This phase change
takes place at a sufficiently higher temperature and therefore does not affect the oxidizer
during storage and operation. The next peak is exothermic and appears at a temperature
of 309ºC. This peak represents the low temperature decomposition (LTD) stage of
ammonium perchlorate.
Figure 3.1 TG/DTA curve of ammonium perchlorate
Last and the most prominent exothermic peak appears at 388ºC and it denotes the high
temperature decomposition (HTD) stage of ammonium perchlorate. Most of the
researchers have reported this peak to be exothermic; however, some have reported that
the high temperature decomposition peak of ammonium perchlorate may be either
exothermic or endothermic depending on the reaction conditions [24]. In our case and
under the experimental conditions mentioned in this work the high temperature
decomposition peak of AP appears as exothermic.
The mass loss or the TG curve for ammonium perchlorate is also presented in Figure 3.1.
The curve clearly shows that the thermal decomposition of ammonium perchlorate takes
place in two distinct mass loss stages. The first mass loss stage begins near a temperature
of 280ºC and it indicates a mass loss of approximately 20 percent up to a temperature of
320ºC. Second and the more significant mass loss stage starts from 340ºC and completes
50
near 400ºC. This mass loss stage depicts almost complete mass loss of ammonium
perchlorate as shown in Figure 3.1.
The mass loss data has been used for the determination of kinetic parameters of the
ammonium perchlorate by Horowitz and Metzger method. The graph used for calculation
of activation energy of the AP is shown in Figure 3.2 below. The energy of activation for
the high temperature decomposition stage of AP calculated in this work is 155.3 kJ/mol.
Another associated thermodynamic parameter is the enthalpy of activation. For AP the
activation enthalpy has been found to be 152.2 kJ/mol. The thermal decomposition
reaction of ammonium perchlorate is reported by Conkling and Mocella in their book
“Chemistry of Pyrotechnics” [1].
2NH4ClO4 → N2+ 3H2O+2HCl+2.5O2 (3.1)
Equation (3.1) shows that the decomposition products of ammonium perchlorate include
nitrogen, oxygen, hydrochloric acid and water. The equation shows that the two moles of
ammonium perchlorate i.e. 235 g produce two and a half moles of oxygen i.e. 80 g.
Therefore, the oxygen released per gram of this oxidizer is 0.34 g.
Figure 3.2 Graph used for calculation of activation energy of ammonium perchlorate
51
The DTA results of AP show that it undergoes a solid state phase transformation near
242oC and its crystal structure changes from orthorhombic to cubic. The decomposition
of AP takes place in two stages i.e. low temperature decomposition stage and a high
temperature decomposition stage. The TG results confirm that the AP decomposition
takes place in two stages with a minor mass loss in the first stage and a major mass loss
in the second stage. The kinetic results show that the activation energy of high
temperature decomposition of ammonium perchlorate is nearly 155kJ/mol. The oxygen
balance of the AP is nearly 34 percent which is quite good. The oxygen balance of an
oxidizer is an important factor for assessing its suitability concerning utilization in
propellant or pyrotechnic compositions.
The AP is perhaps the most widely investigated oxidizer around the globe due to the fact
that it is often used in the composite solid propellant compositions and in pyrotechnics.
The catalysts are known to play an important role in modifying the thermal
decomposition of the AP and a lot of research work is being carried out in this regard.
The nano MgO catalyzed thermal decomposition of AP and changes in its kinetic
behaviour have been investigated in detail in the present work and reported in the next
chapter.
3.4 Thermal and kinetic behaviour of Ammonium Nitrate
Ammonium nitrate (AN) has been heated from room temperature to its complete
decomposition. The DTA curve of ammonium nitrate exhibits four major peaks as shown
in the Figure 3.3. All the peaks are endothermic in nature. The first peak appears at a
temperature of 56ºC. This peak represents the solid state phase transformation of
ammonium nitrate and its crystal structure changes [12]. The commonly encountered
operational and storage temperature ranges between -40oC to 70
oC in different parts of
the world. The phase change of ammonium nitrate is therefore considered to be
undesirable because it takes place within the operational and storage limits of the
propellants/pyrotechnics. The ammonium nitrate is not considered to be thermally very
stable due to this phase transformation.
52
Figure 3.3 TG/DTA curve of ammonium nitrate
The next endothermic peak appearing at 132ºC represents the second phase
transformation of ammonium nitrate. The next peak is very sharp and depicts the melting
of the ammonium nitrate at a temperature of 170ºC. The last peak is very broad it appears
at a temperature of 283ºC. This peak represents the thermal decomposition of ammonium
nitrate.
The TG curve of ammonium nitrate is also shown in Figure 3.3. The curve shows that the
thermal decomposition of ammonium nitrate takes place in a single stage. The TG curve
remains stable with no mass change till 200ºC after which the thermal decomposition of
ammonium nitrate starts. Almost all the mass is lost during the thermal decomposition of
the oxidizer.
The decomposition is rather slow initially but it is quite fast when the temperature
increases beyond 250ºC and results in the complete mass loss. The thermal
decomposition of ammonium nitrate is complete near 300ºC.
53
The graph representing the Horowitz and Metzger method is shown in Figure 3.4. The
energy of activation of ammonium nitrate calculated using TG data is found to be
98.8kJ/mol. The enthalpy of activation of ammonium nitrate has been calculated from its
activation energy and it is 96.5kJ/mol.
Figure 3.4 Graph for calculation of activation energy of Ammonium Nitrate
Gunawan et al. studied the kinetics of ammonium nitrate by using the Kissinger method
and reported that the activation energy of AN was 102.6kJ/mol. This value is very close
to the activation energy value of 98.8kJ/mol reported in the present work. It may be noted
that the kinetic calculations in our case are based on TG data whereas, the heat flow data
has been used to calculate the activation energy in the above mentioned work.
The decomposition of ammonium nitrate takes place in the following manner
NH4NO3 (l) → N2O(g)+2H2O(g) (3.2)
The nitrous oxide produced in this manner further decomposes to release nitrogen and
oxygen gases as per the following reaction.
N2O (g) → N2(g)+ ½ O2(g) (3.3)
54
The overall reaction of the decomposition of ammonium nitrate may be represented in the
following manner.
NH4NO3 (l) → N2(g)+ 2H2O(g) + ½ O2(g) (3.4)
The equation (3.4) shows that one mole of ammonium nitrate i.e. 80 g releases half mole
of the oxygen gas i.e.16 g. Therefore, the amount of oxygen liberated per gram of the
ammonium nitrate is 0.2 grams. The oxygen balance of ammonium nitrate is therefore
nearly 20 percent. The ammonium nitrate therefore has a positive oxygen balance
although it is lower than that of the ammonium perchlorate.
The thermal analysis of ammonium nitrate shows two phase transformations. One of the
phase changes takes place near 56oC and ammonium nitrate is considered to be thermally
unstable due to this phase change. The ammonium nitrate melts at 170oC. The
decomposition of ammonium nitrate takes place in single stage and results in almost
complete mass loss. The decomposition peak temperature of AN under these
experimental conditions is nearly 283oC.
The decomposition products of ammonium nitrate are benign to the atmosphere as they
are chlorine free. This is not the case for AP where the decomposition products contain
HCl which is further converted to chlorine gas and becomes harmful for the ozone layer.
Therefore, despite the inherent drawback such as phase changes and low burning rate AN
based propellants are gaining popularity and the research work is now being focused to
shift the first phase change of AN to a higher temperature and to increase the burn rate of
AN using some suitable modifiers[25].
3.5 Thermal and kinetic behaviour of Potassium Nitrate
The simultaneous thermal analysis of potassium nitrate has been carried to investigate its
thermal behaviour and decomposition. The TG/DTA curve showing the thermal
decomposition of potassium nitrate is shown in the Figure 3.5.
55
Figure 3.5 TG/DTA curve of potassium nitrate
Potassium nitrate has been heated up to 1100ºC and the thermal events have been
observed. Two prominent and very sharp endothermic peaks are visible in the Figure
below a temperature of 400oC. The first endothermic peak appears near a temperature of
130ºC. This peak represents the solid state phase transformation in the potassium nitrate
due to which its crystal structure changes from rhombic to trigonal. The next endothermic
peak is very sharp and it indicates the melting of the potassium nitrate. The peak appears
at a temperature of 334ºC. A series of overlapping endothermic peaks mark the
decomposition of the potassium nitrate. The Potassium nitrate begins to decompose near
590ºC and the decomposition takes place over a wide range of temperature.
The mass loss curve of the potassium nitrate is also presented in the Figure 3.5. The TG
curve remains almost stable from room to nearly 600ºC. Beyond this temperature, the
potassium nitrate begins to decompose and the TG curve shows mass loss. The rate of
decomposition is slow initially in the temperature range of 600 to 750ºC. The TG curve
shows a mass loss of about 30 percent in this temperature region. The thermal
56
decomposition takes place rapidly from 750ºC onwards and shows a major mass loss.
The potassium nitrate decomposes at a higher temperature as compared to the other
oxidizers investigated in this work.
Figure 3.6 Graph for calculation of activation energy of Potassium Nitrate
The experimental data obtained from TG analysis of potassium nitrate has been processed
for the calculation of the activation energy. The activation energy of the potassium nitrate
by using the Horowitz and Metzger method is found to be 278.2 kJ/mol. The value of
activation energy is the highest amongst the oxidizers investigated in this work. The
corresponding value of the enthalpy of activation in this case is 271.5kJ/mol. The
relevant kinetic graph plot is shown in Figure 3.6.
Stern et al. have reported that the decomposition of potassium nitrate takes place in the
following manner [26].
2 KNO3 → 2KNO2+ O2 (3.5)
The equation (3.5) shows that the potassium nitrate decomposes to potassium nitrite with
liberation of some oxygen. The potassium nitrite formed in this manner further
57
decomposes to release more oxygen along with the production of potassium oxide as
shown in the following equation.
2KNO2 → K2O+N2+3/2 O2 (3.6)
From equations (3.5) and (3.6), the overall reaction for the decomposition of ammonium
nitrate has been described as:
2 KNO3 → K2O+N2+5/2 O2 (3.7)
The equation (3.7) states that the decomposition of two moles of potassium nitrate (202
g) produces two and a half moles of free oxygen (80 g).The amount of oxygen released
per gram of this oxidizer is 0.396 g. The oxygen balance of this oxidizer is nearly 40
percent which is very high.
The investigation of thermal behaviour potassium nitrate shows that the oxidizer changes
its crystal structure near 132oC due to a solid state phase transformation. This phase
change however does not affect the oxidizer during storage because it is sufficiently
higher than the maximum ambient temperature of 70oC. The potassium nitrate melts near
334oC under these experimental conditions. The decomposition temperature of this
oxidizer is quite high and also the decomposition takes place over a wide range of
temperature. The activation energy of this oxidizer is very high and in the present work, it
was found to be 278.2 kJ/mol. The corresponding enthalpy of activation is 271.5 kJ/mol.
3.6 Thermal and kinetic behaviour of Potassium Permanganate
The TG/DTA curve of the thermal decomposition of potassium permanganate is shown in
the Figure 3.7. Thermal behavior of the potassium permanganate has been studied up to a
temperature of 550ºC. The heat flow curve of this oxidizer shows two different peaks.
The first peak is exothermic in nature and it appears at a temperature of 284ºC. The peak
begins near a temperature of 240ºC close to the melting point of potassium
permanganate. The peak is also associated with a mass loss and represents the
decomposition of potassium permanganate. The next peak is endothermic in nature and
represents a high temperature decomposition step of potassium permanganate near 511ºC.
58
The mass loss curve of potassium permanganate is also presented in Figure 3.7. The
potassium permanganate decomposes in two mass loss steps. The TG curve shows no
change in the sample mass till a temperature of 240ºC and beyond this temperature the
decomposition of potassium permanganate takes place with a mass loss of nearly18
percent. The mass loss curve becomes stable again till the second step of the mass loss
starts near 450ºC. Only about 2 percent more mass is lost in this stage.
Herbstein et al., have reported that the decomposition of potassium permanganate takes
place in the following manner [27].
10 KMnO4→2.65 K2MnO4+[2.35 K2O·7.35·MnO2.05]+6O2 (3.8)
The K2MnO4 produced in this manner is further decomposed and liberates more oxygen
as shown in equation (3.9).
10 K2MnO4→ 5·7 K3MnO4+ 0·5(2·9 K2O,8·6 MnO2·1)+ 3·40 O2 (3.9)
Figure 3.7 TG/DTA curve of potassium permanganate
59
It may be calculated from equation (3.8) and (3.9) that the decomposition of ten moles of
potassium permanganate i.e.1580 g produces 6.901 moles of oxygen i.e.
220.83g.Therefore, of oxygen liberated per gram of this oxidizer is 0.14 grams. The
oxygen balance of this oxidizer is nearly 14 percent.
3.7 Thermal and kinetic behaviour of Barium Nitrate
The DTA curve of barium nitrate has been presented in Figure 3.8. The heat flow curve
does not show any thermal event till a temperature of 592oC. The first peak is
endothermic in nature and represents the melting of barium nitrate near 592oC. Thermal
decomposition of the barium nitrate does not show a single peak and it rather appears as a
series of overlapping endothermic peaks. The major peak representing the decomposition
of barium nitrate takes place near 690oC. The barium nitrate does not undergo any solid
state phase changes as opposed to ammonium perchlorate, ammonium nitrate and
potassium nitrate. It is therefore considered to be thermally stable till its melting and
subsequent decomposition.
Figure 3.8 TG/DTA curve of barium nitrate showing the heat flow and mass loss
60
The TG curve of the barium nitrate is also shown in Figure 3.8. There is no mass loss
initially and the TG curve remains stable till melting of the oxidizer. The thermal
decomposition of barium nitrate is associated with some mass loss in the temperature
range of 580oC to 700
oC. The TG curve shows nearly 40 percent mass loss in the
temperature range mentioned above. The thermal decomposition of barium nitrate
completes near 700oC.
Figure 3.9 represents the kinetic plot of barium nitrate. The activation energy of the
barium nitrate by using the TG data has been calculated to be nearly 211kJ/mol. The
corresponding value of the enthalpy of activation has been found to be 205.5kJ/mol.
Figure 3.9 The kinetic plot of barium nitrate representing the Horowitz Method
The decomposition reaction of barium nitrate has been previously reported in literature
and it is presented below [15,28].
Ba(NO3)2 → BaO + 2NO+ O2 (3.10)
61
The equation above shows that one mole of barium nitrate (261 g) produces 3/2 moles of
oxygen (48 g). Therefore, the oxygen liberated by on gram of barium nitrate as per the
above equation is nearly 0.18 g.
It is important to mention here that some of the previous studies on barium nitrate have
reported that high temperature decomposition mechanism of barium nitrate results in the
production of nitrogen gas and the decomposition is described below [29].
Ba(NO3)2 → BaO + N2+ O2 (3.11)
The high temperature decomposition of barium nitrate liberates 5/2 moles (80 g) of
oxygen per mole of barium nitrate (261 g). The oxygen balance of barium nitrate in this
case is nearly 30 percent.
The investigation of barium nitrate shows that it is thermally very stable and does not
undergo any phase changes. There is no thermal event prior to its melting. The
decomposition peak temperature under these experimental conditions was 690oC. The
decomposition of barium nitrate is associated with nearly 40 percent mass loss. The
activation energy has been found to be nearly 211kJ/mol and the enthalpy of activation
was 205kJ/mol.
3.8 Comparative Analysis – Discussion
The data obtained from the experimental work has been summarized and presented in
Table 3.1. The results depict that ammonium perchlorate decomposes near 309oC. The
comparison with other oxidizers shows that this temperature is higher than the
decomposition temperature of ammonium nitrate and potassium permanganate but it is
significantly lower than the decomposition temperature of potassium nitrate and barium
nitrate. The high temperature decomposition temperature of AP is 388oC and it is also
lower than the decomposition temperatures of potassium nitrate and barium nitrate.
Ammonium perchlorate undergoes a solid state phase transformation near 242oC.
62
Table 3.1 Comparative data of the oxidizers
The activation energy of the high temperature decomposition stage of ammonium
perchlorate is nearly 155kJ/mol. The activation energy of AP is higher than that of
ammonium nitrate but lower than the activation energy of potassium nitrate and barium
nitrate. The activation energy of AP is neither too high nor too low. It is therefore
considered to be adequately sensitive as well as safe. The oxygen balance of AP is nearly
34 percent and it is higher than the oxygen balance of the ammonium nitrate, potassium
permanganate and barium nitrate.
The decomposition peak temperature of ammonium nitrate is 283oC and it is the lowest
amongst all the five investigated oxidizers. Due to low decomposition temperature, it is
relatively easy to decompose this oxidizer. Ammonium nitrate shows two phase changes
S.No Oxidizer Decomposition
peak temperature
1st Phase
change
temperature
Activation
Energy
(kJ/mol)
Oxygen
released per
gram
1
Ammonium
Perchlorate
309oC
242oC
155.3
0.34 grams
2 Ammonium
Nitrate
283oC 56
oC 98.8 0.20 grams
3 Potassium Nitrate 625oC 130
oC 278.2 0.40 grams
4 Potassium
Permanganate
284oC No phase
change
------ 0.14 grams
5 Barium Nitrate 690oC No phase
change
211.2 0.30 grams
63
prior to its melting and decomposition. The first phase change takes place near 56oC and
it is very undesirable. The temperature cycling through this phase change temperature
may cause volume changes in the composition based on this oxidizer. The volume change
may lead to development of cracks and ultimately bursting of the rocket motor containing
ammonium nitrate based propellant. The second phase change of ammonium nitrate
taking place near 130oC is considered to be safe. The phase changes of potassium nitrate
and ammonium perchlorate take place at 130oC and 242
oC respectively and they are safe.
The activation energy of ammonium nitrate is nearly 98.8kJ/mol and it is the lowest
amongst all the five oxidizers. Ammonium nitrate requires less energy to decompose and
the decomposition takes place at a lower temperature. The activation energy of potassium
nitrate is nearly three times higher than the activation energy of ammonium nitrate. The
oxygen balance of ammonium nitrate is nearly 20 percent. It is higher than the oxygen
balance of potassium permanganate but lower than the oxygen balance of ammonium
perchlorate, barium nitrate and potassium nitrate.
The decomposition peak temperature of potassium permanganate is nearly 284oC and it is
lower than the decomposition temperatures of ammonium perchlorate, potassium nitrate
and barium nitrate. The oxidizer can be easily decomposed due to its low decomposition
temperature as compared to the other oxidizer. The main advantage of the potassium
permanganate as an oxidizer is that it is thermally very stable and does not undergo any
solid state phase change unlike the other oxidizers such as ammonium nitrate, potassium
nitrate and even ammonium perchlorate.
The thermal decomposition of the potassium nitrate begins near 590ºC and the
decomposition is represented by overlapping endothermic peaks over a wide range of
temperature. The first endothermic peak appears near 625oC. The decomposition
temperature of potassium nitrate is very high as compared to ammonium perchlorate,
potassium permanganate and ammonium perchlorate. The oxidizer exhibits a solid state
phase transformation near 130oC. This phase change however takes place at a
temperature higher than the maximum possible ambient temperature and therefore does
not influence its thermal stability. The activation energy of potassium nitrate is nearly
278kJ/mol and it the highest amongst all the investigated oxidizers. The activation energy
64
and the decomposition temperature of potassium nitrate are both very high. It means that
the potassium nitrate is difficult to decompose and requires a lot of energy for its
decomposition but at the same time it is considered to be safe. The oxidizer has a very
high oxygen balance of nearly 40 percent which is highest amongst the five oxidizers.
Barium nitrate also decomposes at a very high temperature and the main decomposition
peak appears near 690oC. This value is higher than the peak temperatures of the other
oxidizers investigated in this work. The decomposition of barium nitrate is endothermic
in nature. Barium nitrate is thermally very stable and it does not show any phase change.
The activation energy of barium nitrate calculated in the present work is 212kJ/mol. This
value is higher than the activation energies of ammonium nitrate, potassium
permanganate and ammonium perchlorate. The oxidizer is difficult to decompose due to
high decomposition temperature and high activation energy. The oxygen balance of
barium nitrate is nearly 30 percent and it is much higher than the oxygen balance of
potassium permanganate and ammonium nitrate.
3.9 Conclusions
Thermal and kinetic behaviour of five different oxidizers including ammonium
perchlorate, ammonium nitrate, potassium nitrate, barium nitrate and potassium
permanganate has been investigated under exactly similar reaction conditions. The
comparison of phase transformations, thermal decomposition, activation energy and
oxidizing ability of the above mentioned oxidizers has been carried out to identify the
pros and cons of each individual oxidizer.
The thermal and kinetic investigation of ammonium perchlorate showed that the oxidizer
exhibits a solid state phase transformation near 242oC. AP decomposition takes place in
two stages i.e. low temperature decomposition stage and a high temperature
decomposition stage. Both the decomposition stages are exothermic in nature. The
activation energy of the high temperature decomposition stage of AP is nearly155 kJ/mol.
The oxygen balance of the AP is nearly 34 percent and considered to be fairly good.
Ammonium nitrate undergoes two phase transformations. The first one appears at a
temperature of 56oC and considered to be a concern for the thermal stability. The oxidizer
65
decomposes in a single stage and the decomposition peak temperature of ammonium
nitrate is 283oC.The decomposition of ammonium nitrate is endothermic in nature. The
activation energy of ammonium nitrate is nearly 99kJ/mol. The oxygen balance of
ammonium nitrate is approximately 20 percent. The thermal and kinetic behaviour of
potassium nitrate showed that the oxidizer undergoes a solid state phase transformation
near 130oC. The thermal decomposition of potassium nitrate is endothermic in nature and
takes place over a wide range of temperature. The activation energy of the oxidizer is
very high and it is 278kJ/mol. The oxygen balance of potassium nitrate is very good i.e.
40 percent.
The potassium permanganate is thermally stable and does not undergo any phase
transformation. The thermal decomposition temperature of the oxidizer is 284oC. The
decomposition of potassium permanganate is exothermic in nature. The oxidizer has
relatively low oxygen balance of nearly 14 percent. The thermal and kinetic behaviour of
barium nitrate revealed that it is thermally stable and does not undergo any phase change.
The decomposition peak temperature of this oxidizer is very high i.e. 690oC. The
decomposition of barium nitrate is endothermic in nature. The activation energy of
barium nitrate is very high and it nearly 211kJ/mol. The oxygen balance of barium nitrate
is good and it is close to 30 percent.
References
[1] J.A. Conkling, C. Mocella, Chemistry of Pyrotechnics: Basic Principles and
Theory, CRC Press, 1985.
[2] S. Chaturvedi, P.N. Dave, Journal of Saudi Chemical Society 17 (2013) 135.
[3] P.R. Patil, V.e.N. Krishnamurthy, S.S. Joshi, Propellants, Explosives,
Pyrotechnics 31 (2006) 442.
[4] I. Tuukkanen, E.L. Charsley, S. Goodall, P.G. Laye, J.J. Rooney, T.T. Griffiths,
H. Lemmetyinen, Thermochimica acta 443 (2006) 116.
[5] S. Danali, R. Palaiah, K. Raha, Defence Science Journal 60 (2010) 152.
[6] V.P. Sinditskii, V.Y. Egorshev, A.I. Levshenkov, V.V. Serushkin, Propellants,
Explosives, Pyrotechnics 30 (2005) 269.
[7] V. Boldyrev, Thermochimica Acta 443 (2006) 1.
66
[8] O. Biblarz, G.P. Sutton, Rocket Propulsion Elements, Wiley, 2011.
[9] E. Santacesaria, S. Carra, Reaction Kinetics and Catalysis Letters 5 (1976) 317.
[10] M. Rajić, M. Sućeska, Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry 63 (2000) 375.
[11] M. Zou, X. Jiang, L. Lu, X. Wang, Journal of hazardous materials 225 (2012)
124.
[12] R. Gunawan, D. Zhang, Journal of hazardous materials 165 (2009) 751.
[13] M.K. Abhay, P.D. Devendra, Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment 14
(2010) 94.
[14] M.E. Brown, K.C. Sole, M.W. Beck, Thermochimica acta 89 (1985) 27.
[15] A. Eslami, S. Hosseini, S. Pourmortazavi, Fuel 87 (2008) 3339.
[16] X. Zhang, X. Chen, M.H. Feng, Z.F. Zheng, G.P. Pan, H.P. Lv, Advanced
Materials Research 550 (2012) 27.
[17] M.E. Brown, Introduction to thermal analysis: techniques and applications,
Springer, 2001.
[18] S. Brown, E.L. Charsley, S. Goodall, P.G. Laye, J.J. Rooney, T.T. Griffiths,
Thermochimica acta 401 (2003) 53.
[19] D. Ouyang, G. Pan, H. Guan, C. Zhu, X. Chen, Thermochimica Acta 513 (2011)
119.
[20] G. Duan, X. Yang, J. Chen, G. Huang, L. Lu, X. Wang, Powder technology 172
(2007) 27.
[21] P.R. Patil, V.e.N. Krishnamurthy, S.S. Joshi, Propellants, Explosives,
Pyrotechnics 33 (2008) 266.
[22] M. Shamsipur, S.M. Pourmortazavi, S.S. Hajimirsadeghi, Combustion Science
and Technology 183 (2011) 575.
[23] A. Said, R. Al-Qasmi, Thermochimica acta 275 (1996) 83.
[24] S. Vyazovkin, C.A. Wight, Chemistry of materials 11 (1999) 3386.
[25] C. Oommen, S. Jain, Journal of hazardous materials 67 (1999) 253.
[26] K.H. Stern, E. Weise, High Temperature Properties and Decomposition of
Inorganic Salts. Part 2. Carbonates. DTIC Document, 1969.
[27] F. Herbstein, M. Kapon, A. Weissman, Journal of thermal analysis 41 (1994) 303.
67
[28] O.Q. González, J.L. Burell, E. Martínez, C. Barrera, R. Acosta, N. Ruiz, Revista
Cubana de Química 16 (2010).
[29] S.G. Hosseini, A. Eslami, Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry 101 (2010)
1111.
68
Chapter 4
Modification of barium nitrate and
ammonium perchlorate
4.1 Synthesis of micro porous barium nitrate with improved ignition
reliability
The work presented in this chapter reports the synthesis and characterization of a micro
porous barium nitrate that may be used effectively as an effective pyrotechnic oxidizer.
The pyrotechnic compositions commonly comprise some solid fuel and an oxidizer. The
oxidizers are important ingredient of pyrotechnic/propellant compositions and provide
oxygen for the ignition of the fuel. The pyrotechnic compositions are used to obtain
certain special effects that include heat, light sound and smoke. These effects are not only
used in the fireworks but in certain important military applications [1,2].
4.2 Introduction
Quite a lot of compounds are being used as oxidizers in various pyrotechnic/ propellant
compositions. Some of these oxidizers include potassium chlorate, potassium perchlorate,
strontium nitrate, barium nitrate, ammonium nitrate and ammonium perchlorate to name
a few [3-7]. Potassium chlorate had been one of the most widely used oxidizer in the field
of pyrotechnics for quite some time. It has advantage of ease and reliability of ignition
and it is relatively cost effective as compared to some other oxidizers [8,9]. However,
potassium chlorate suffers from some serious safety concerns and the pyrotechnic
compositions containing this oxidizer are considered to be unsafe. The use of this
oxidizer has caused some accidents in the past due to which its use in pyrotechnics has
been restricted and even banned in several parts of the world. Compared to potassium
chlorate, the barium nitrate is considered to be relatively much safer. But there are some
69
intrinsic draw backs in the combustion behaviour of barium nitrate [10]. The pyrotechnic
compositions based on barium nitrate are difficult to ignite and they can easily flame out
even after ignition. These factors pose some serious questions regarding the reliability of
compositions that contain this oxidizer. The oxygen content, reliability and safety are
some of the important factors that are considered while assessing the suitability of any
oxidizer concerting its use in the pyrotechnic/propellant compositions [11]. The oxidizing
ability of the barium nitrate is fairly well and makes it suitable for its use as an oxidant
for pyrotechnics. While, barium nitrate is quite safe as a pyrotechnic oxidizer, its ignition
reliability needs improvement. The ignition reliability of barium nitrate can be increased
by different methods. One way is to use some thermal decomposition catalysts that will
sensitize the oxidant and improve its reliability and ease of ignition [12-14]. However, in
the present work, inorganic vesicants have been used to modify the performance of the
barium nitrate by producing micro pores which render the oxidant as more sensitive and
easy to ignite [15,16]. The vesicants that have been used for the modification of barium
nitrate are sodium bicarbonate, potassium carbonate and ammonium perchlorate. The
micro porous barium nitrate modified by this method has been characterized using X-ray
diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Two pyrotechnic mixtures
were formulated by using pure and modified barium nitrate as oxidant and the aluminum
powder as a fuel. The ignition behaviour of pyrotechnic mixture containing the vesicant
modified barium nitrate has not been reported earlier to the best of our knowledge.
4.3 Experimental Conditions
Analytical grade barium nitrate by Scharlau (Spain), potassium carbonate by Merck
(Germany), sodium bi-carbonate by Sigma Aldrich (Germany) have been used in the
present work to prepare the modified barium nitrate. The defence grade ammonium
perchlorate was purchased from National Development Complex (Pakistan). The
thermally saturated solution of barium nitrate was prepared and approximately five per
cent inorganic vesicant was added to this solution in each case. The above mentioned
solution was heated and the contents were evaporated by careful heating and allowed to
crystallize. The crystals formed in this manner were then heated in the furnace to
70
decompose the vesicant. The final product was finely ground and sieved through 100
mesh sieve. The characterization of the modified barium nitrate and pure barium nitrate
was carried out by different analytical techniques for comparison. The XRD instrument
by STOE Germany has been used for the structural analysis and the sample scan range
was from 10o
to 70o. Scanning electron microscope JSM- 6490 has been used in the
present work and the micrographs were taken at various magnifications. The thermal
behaviour and ignition of the pyrotechnic compositions containing pure and modified
barium nitrate was carried using the Diamond TG/DTA instrument of Perkin Elmer. The
experiments were performed at a heating rate of 10oC /min for the pyrotechnic mixtures.
The nitrogen gas has been used as an inert medium and its flow rate was maintained at
100ml/min. The crucibles made up of alumina pans were used to hold the sample and the
reference.
4.4. Results and Discussion
4.4.1 SEM Analysis
The SEM micrographs of the pure barium nitrate are shown in Figure 4.1 at two different
magnifications. It is clear from the Figure that pure barium nitrate is solid in shape and
its surface feature is quite smooth and plain. There are no pores or cracks in the
composition. The SEM micrographs of the vesicant modified barium nitrate are shown in
4.2. Three different vesicants have been used to modify the barium nitrate and create
pores in it. These vesicants include potassium carbonate, ammonium perchlorate and
sodium bi-carbonate. It is evident from Figure 4.2 that the morphology and surface
feature of barium nitrate modified with each vesicant is different in all the three cases.
The modified barium nitrate in each case is porous and fluffy with relatively uneven
surface. The surface is quite different in appearance as compared to the pure barium
nitrate. It can be seen from Fig. 4.2 (a, b, c) that barium nitrate modified with different
vesicants is porous and size of the pores and the number of pores is different in all the
cases. Figure 4,2 (a) shows that barium nitrate modified with the potassium carbonate as
a vesicant has the maximum number of pores, however, the pore size is comparatively
smaller than other vesicants.
71
Figure 4.1 SEM micrographs of pure barium nitrate
The surface feature is relatively rough and uneven as opposed to the smooth and even
surface of pure barium nitrate. The surface of barium nitrate modified with sodium
bicarbonate is shown in Figure 4.2 (b) and it also shows some distinct pores whereas the
surface feature has been least effected in this case due to the modification. The surface is
not as smooth as the pure barium nitrate but better than the one modified with potassium
carbonate. Barium nitrate modified with ammonium perchlorate is shown in Figure 4.2
(c). It has relatively less number of pores as compared to other versions of vesicant
72
modified barium nitrate. The size of the pores is larger as compared to other vesicants in
this case.
Figure 4.2(a) SEM micrographs of barium nitrate modified
with potassium carbonate
Figure 4.2(b) SEM micrographs of barium nitrate modified
with sodium bicarbonate
73
The measurement of the pore size from the SEM images shows that all the pores are in
the range of the micrometers and modified barium nitrate is regarded as a micro porous
structure. The porous material in general is more reactive as compared to the solid
material due to its larger exposed area, so the modified barium nitrate is likely to be more
reactive. Moreover, physical properties of the barium nitrate modified with different
vesicants are expected to be different.
Figure 4.2(c) SEM micrographs of barium nitrate modified
with ammonium perchlorate
4.4.2 Bulk density
Bulk density of pure barium nitrate and the modified versions has been calculated using
graduated cylinder method. The bulk density of all the four versions of barium nitrate has
been presented in Table 4.1. The data show that the bulk density of the barium nitrate
decreases after the modification in all the three cases, however to a different extent.
Numerous factors can influence the bulk density of any material. One of the most
important factors is the entrapped air and the interstitial air. The bulk density is found to
74
decrease in all the modified versions of barium nitrate. It is obvious that the development
of pores in the barium nitrate is the main reasons for the decrease in the bulk density.
Table 4.1 Bulk density of pure and modified barium nitrate
Barium nitrate modified with potassium carbonate has the lowest bulk density and the
percentage decrease in this case is nearly 12 %. The bulk density of barium nitrate
modified with sodium bi carbonate and ammonium perchlorate decreased by
approximately 10 % and 4 % respectively.
4.4.3 XRD Analysis
XRD analysis of pure barium nitrate and the modified samples has been carried out to see
different type of structural changes that may have resulted due to the modification. The
XRD data show that the crystal structure of the barium nitrate before and after the
modification was cubic and there was no change in any of the modified samples. The
XRD spectra of pure and the modified barium nitrate have been shown in Fig. 4.3 and 4.4
respectively (Miller indices have been marked). A total of fifteen distinct peaks were
observed in the XRD spectra of pure barium nitrate out of which five main diffraction
peaks were observed at 2θ position of 18.96o, 21.93
o, 36.6
o, 38.5
o and 59.15
o. It is
observed from Fig. 4.4 (a) that the total number of diffraction peaks decreased in barium
Inorganic
Vesicant
Mass of the
sample (g)
Volume of the
sample (cm3)
Bulk density
(g/cm3)
Percent decrease
in bulk density
Pure barium
nitrate
9.947 5 1.98 Nil
Potassium
carbonate
8.715 5 1.74 12.12
Ammonium
perchlorate
9.561 5 1.91 3.66
Sodium bi-
carbonate
8.951 5 1.79 9.59
75
Figure 4.3 XRD spectra of pure barium nitrate
Figure 4.4 (a) XRD spectra of barium nitrate modified with ammonium perchlorate
76
nitrate modified with the ammonium perchlorate, however, the peak position of the main
diffraction peaks did not change. The intensity of main diffraction peaks decreased
significantly which meant that the barium nitrate after modification with ammonium
perchlorate became less crystalline. The average crystallite size of barium nitrate also
decreased after modification with ammonium perchlorate (Table 4.2).
Table 4.2 Lattice parameters of pure and modified barium nitrate
Figure 4.4 (b) XRD spectra of barium nitrate modified with potassium carbonate
Composition Cell Parameters Volume of the
Cell 106 pm
3
Crystallite
size nm a (nm) b (nm) c (nm)
Pure barium nitrate
81.184
81.184
81.184
535.07
79
Potassium carbonate
modified
81.260 81.260 81.260 536.58 53.6
Ammonium
perchlorate modified
81.190
81.190
81.190
535.19
73.2
sodium bi-carbonate
modified
81.100
81.100
81.100
533.41 35.3
77
For the barium nitrate modified with the potassium carbonate, the number of peaks and
the peak positions did not change as shown in Figure 4.4(b). However, in this case the
intensity of some of the main diffraction peaks increased significantly and the modified
barium nitrate became more crystalline as opposed to the one modified with ammonium
perchlorate. The average crystallite size, however, decreased in this case as well. The
XRD spectra of barium nitrate modified with sodium bicarbonate is shown in Figure 4.4
(c). It is seen from the spectra that the relative intensity of the main diffraction peaks
decreased greatly which meant that the modification decreased the crystallinity of the
barium nitrate as in case of ammonium perchlorate.
Figure 4.4 (c) XRD spectra of barium nitrate modified with sodium bi carbonate
The crystal structure of the modified versions of barium nitrate remained the same in all
the three cases showing that the modification did not affect the geometry of the crystal.
The crystallite size has reduced greatly in all the modified versions of barium nitrate,
therefore, it is expected that the modification has increased the reactivity of the barium
nitrate. The information regarding different cell parameters as well as the values of
78
crystallite size have been presented in Table 4.2. The data shows that no significant
variation has occurred in the value of the cell parameters due to the modification of
barium nitrate. The parameters a, b and c have not changed much and the volume of the
cell also remains the same.
The reduction in the crystallite size of the grain exposes more surface area and therefore
makes it more reactive. The most significant variation has been seen for barium nitrate
modified with sodium bi carbonate where the average crystallite size has reduced from 79
nm to 35.3 nm.
4.4.4 Thermal Analysis of binary pyrotechnic mixtures
Thermal analysis is the most widely used technique to investigate the thermal
decomposition and ignition of pyrotechnic mixtures [17-19]. The DTA curve of
pyrotechnic mixture containing micro sized aluminum powder and pure barium nitrate is
shown in Fig. 4.5.
Figure 4.5 Heat flow curves of aluminum with pure
and modified barium
79
The heat flow curve of the pyrotechnic mixture made with modified barium nitrate is also
presented in Fig. 4.5. The DTA curve of the pyrotechnic mixture consisting of aluminum
powder and pure barium nitrate shows an endothermic peak near 583oC close to the
melting point of the barium nitrate showing that the barium nitrate in the pyrotechnic
mixture melts near this temperature. Just after melting, the mixture decomposes
exothermically near a temperature of 635oC. This temperature is regarded as the ignition
temperature of the pyrotechnic composition based on pure barium nitrate. On the other
hand, it is clearly seen from the DTA curves that pyrotechnic composition formulated
with modified barium nitrate shows only a single exothermic peak and ignites at a
temperature of 606oC. Since this temperature is much lower than the ignition
temperature of pure barium nitrate based composition so it may be concluded that the
ignition behaviour of modified barium nitrate has improved.
4. 5 Conclusions
The micro porous barium nitrate has been synthesized using three different inorganic
vesicants to improve its ignition reliability as a pyrotechnic oxidant. The SEM results
reveal that the surface features and morphology of the barium nitrate has changed after
the modification. The results indicate the presence of micro sized pores in the modified
versions of barium nitrate and it has a porous structure, whereas, pure barium nitrate has
a very solid and smooth surface. It was found that the barium nitrate modified with
potassium carbonate has the highest number of pores. The exposed area of vesicant
modified barium nitrate, therefore, increases due to the production of micro pores and
improves the reactivity of the pyrotechnic mixture. The bulk density of barium nitrate has
been found to reduce in all the cases after the modification. This reduction in the bulk
density is attributed to the production of pores which result in lowering of the bulk
density. The crystal structure and the cell parameters of the barium nitrate did not change
after the modification. The crystallite size of the barium nitrate reduced after
modification with vesicants. The pyrotechnic composition based on aluminum powder
and modified barium nitrate ignited at a lower temperature as compared to the one
80
formulated with pure barium nitrate showing that the reactivity of modified barium
nitrate has increased as a pyrotechnic oxidant. The results obtained in the present work
encourage the use of vesicant modified barium nitrate as a safe and reliable oxidant for
the pyrotechnic applications.
4.6 Improvement in the thermal and kinetic behaviour of
ammonium perchlorate using nano magnesium oxide
catalyst
The work presented in this section of the chapter is focused on the improvement of the
thermal cum kinetic behaviour of ammonium perchlorate. The thermal behaviour of
ammonium perchlorate is known to be influenced by the addition of various catalysts.
The magnesium oxide nano particles have been used as thermal decomposition catalyst to
increase the reactivity of the ammonium perchlorate.
4.7 Introduction
Ammonium perchlorate finds extensive use as an inorganic oxidizer in composite solid
propellants. It is one of the most frequently researched oxidizer due to its high utility in
various propellant and pyrotechnic compositions [20,21]. A remarkably large quantity of
this oxidizer is also used in space shuttles [22]. More than million pounds of ammonium
perchlorate is consumed in space shuttles in a single launch. The nature of the thermal
decomposition of the ammonium perchlorate plays an important role in the combustion
behavior of the propellants. The thermal decomposition of ammonium perchlorate is
known to exhibit significantly high sensitivity to different kinds of additives. The
additives are assumed to influence the thermal decomposition and the reactivity of AP
based compositions [23]. Effect of nano metals and nano sized transition metal oxides on
the thermal decomposition of ammonium perchlorate has therefore been an area of
interest for the researchers concerned with energetic materials [24-31].
81
The effect of addition of MgO nano particles on the thermal as well as the kinetic
behavior of ammonium perchlorate has been investigated in the present work. The nano
sized metal oxides are considered to be more efficient as a catalyst due to relatively
greater exposed area as compared to the micro sized particles [32]. The MgO
nanoparticles having an average size of 20 to 30 nm have been used as a catalyst in this
work to increase the reactivity of the AP. The nano particles were characterized by using
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and X-ray diffraction. The decomposition kinetics
of AP and different energetic composition containing AP strongly depends upon the
morphology and size of the nano additives. The catalytic effect of nano MgO on the
thermal decomposition of AP has been reported previously by Guorong Duan et al. [33].
The earlier work reports the effect of different percentages of nano magnesium oxide on
the thermal decomposition of AP and shows that two decomposition stages completely
merge with each other by using 4 percent MgO as a catalyst. At lower percentages of
MgO, the decomposition stages do not completely merge into each other. The present
work is an attempt to increase the reactivity of ammonium perchlorate and focuses on
calculating the change in the kinetic parameters of the catalyzed and non-catalyzed AP.
The kinetic parameters of MgO catalyzed AP are not reported in the earlier mentioned
work.
Thermal analysis is an effective tool for the study of energetic materials and their
ingredients. It is widely used to obtain thermal and kinetic data to gain an insight into the
decomposition reactions [34-36]. The kinetic data gives useful information regarding the
thermal decomposition and reactivity of any material. Simultaneous thermal analysis has
been used to accomplish the experimental work presented in this part. The kinetic
parameters of pure and catalyzed ammonium perchlorate have been calculated by using
non isothermal approach based on Kissinger method.
The focus in this work has been to determine the kinetic parameters such as activation
energy, frequency factor, reaction rate constant as well as the enthalpy of activation. This
work attempts to elucidate the decomposition mechanism of the pure AP and the one
catalyzed with a small amount of nano MgO on the basis of data obtained during the
82
analytical experiments. Comparative analysis of the pure and the catalyzed ammonium
perchlorate has been carried out to monitor the changes in thermal and kinetic
parameters. The experimental results indicate that nano MgO has made a strong catalytic
effect on the thermal decomposition of ammonium perchlorate and reduced the two
distinct stages of decomposition of ammonium perchlorate to only one stage. Moreover,
the reactivity of AP has also increased.
4.8 Experimental Conditions
The defence grade ammonium perchlorate and MgO nano powder have been used to
carry out this part of the work. The MgO and AP and were mixed in the weight ratio of 4
percent and 96 percent respectively. Thorough mixing of the ingredients was carried out
and the samples were pre heated for six hours before the conduct of experiments to make
sure that there was no moisture in the sample. MgO nano particles were characterized
using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and X-ray diffraction. The XRD instrument
by STOE Germany is used for the analysis. The sample was scanned from 10o to 70
o.
JSM- 6490 scanning electron microscope was used to get the micrographs of the
nanoparticles. The methods of thermogravimetery (TG) and differential thermal analysis
(DTA) have been used to study the decomposition process of pure and catalyzed
ammonium perchlorate. Diamond TG/DTA instrument by Perkin Elmer has been used for
simultaneous thermal analysis of the sample. The instrument performs simultaneous TG
and DTA measurements on one and the same sample. The aluminum crucibles were
used to hold the samples for the analysis. The nitrogen gas was used for producing inert
atmosphere during the conduct of all the experiments. To investigate the effect of heating
rate on decomposition peak temperature of ammonium perchlorate catalyzed with nano
MgO, the experiments were conducted at four different heating rates i.e. 2oC/min,
6oC/min, 10
oC/min and 20
oC/min. The samples were heated up to 500
oC till the
completion of high temperature decomposition reaction using multiple heating rates. The
peak temperature data obtained from heat flow curves has been used to calculate the
kinetic parameters of pure and catalyzed ammonium perchlorate using Kissinger and
83
Ozawa methods. The methods have been described in detail in chapter 2, therefore only
the final equations are presented here.
4.8.1 Kinetic Methods
The details of the kinetic methods are given in Chapter 2 and are not discussed here. The
final form of the Kissinger equation is given below[37] :
(
)
(4.1)
In the equation (1), is the peak temperature, is the heating rate, “A” represents
frequency factor, “R” is the gas constant, “T” represents sample temperature, “n”
represents reaction order and “E” represents activation energy in kJ/mol . When
activation energy “E” is known, the frequency factor is obtained in the following manner
[38,39]:
[ (
)]
(4.2)
And finally, the reaction rate constant can be found by using the famous Arrhenius
equation.
k = A (
) (4.3)
The representative equation of the Ozawa Method is given below[40]:
(
( )) (
) (4.4)
84
In the above equation (4.4), “Ea” is the activation energy in kJ/mol, “β” is the heating rate
and “Tp” is the peak temperature corresponding to a specific heating rate and “R” is the
universal gas constant.
4.9 Results and Discussion
4.9.1 Analysis of Nano particles
The SEM image of the nano sized MgO is shown in Figure 4.6. The nano particles show
good regularity in terms of their morphology and they are found to be very well
dispersed. The particles are elliptical in shape and not perfect spheres. The average
diameter of the elongated side of particles measured from SEM images is between 20 to
30 nm. The measurements show that the average diameter of the shorter side of these
particles is between 15 to 20 nm. The MgO powder, therefore, can be truly regarded as
nano sized and considered to be very suitable for the catalytic activity.
Figure 4.6 SEM micrograph of nano sized MgO powder used
for catalyzing AP
85
The XRD pattern of nano sized MgO powder is shown in Figure 4.7. Five main
diffraction peaks can be seen in the spectra and these peaks are located at 37.92o, 42.56
o,
62.19 o
, 73.26 o
, 78.42 o
. These peaks typically represent MgO and the peak data is in fair
agreement with the reference pattern No 01-074-1225. The Miller Indices have been
assigned to all the five peaks as shown in the Figure. The peaks are in general broad,
showing that the particle size is fairly small. The crystallite size of the MgO particles has
been calculated using Scherer formula for three different faces and the average crystallite
of the sample was found close to 9nm.
Figure 4.7 XRD spectra of the nano sized MgO powder
4.9.2 Analysis of Pure AP
Heat flow curve of the pure ammonium perchlorate shows three major peaks representing
three distinct events (Figure 4.8). First endothermic peak of ammonium perchlorate
appears near a temperature of 241 ºC and corresponds to solid state phase transformation
during which the crystal structure of ammonium perchlorate changes from orthorhombic
to cubic [41]. Next two peaks appearing in the curve are both exothermic in nature. The
first exothermic peak appears at 310.7 ºC and it marks the low temperature
86
decomposition stage of ammonium perchlorate. The second exothermic peak appears at
384.1 ºC and marks the high temperature decomposition stage of ammonium perchlorate.
Figure 4.8 also presents the weight loss curve of ammonium perchlorate. The weight loss
curve shows two events as opposed to three events exhibited in the heat flow curve. It is
due to the fact that the first endothermic peak corresponding to the phase change is not
associated with any weight loss.
Figure 4.8 TG/DTA curve of pure ammonium perchlorate
It is also confirmed from TG curve that decomposition of pure ammonium perchlorate is
a two stage process. The first weight loss stage is between 280 ºC and 320 ºC resulting in
more than 20 percent weight loss of the sample. The second weight loss stage starts at
340 ºC and ends close to 400 ºC causing complete decomposition of ammonium
perchlorate. Ammonium perchlorate decomposes to form various products. The
decomposition equation of ammonium perchlorate has been reported as follows [21].
2NH4ClO4 → N2 + 3H2O+2HCl+2.5O2 (4.5)
87
The effect of heating rate on the heat flow curve of AP has been shown in Figure 4.9. The
Figure shows that the first endothermic peak shows only a slight variation due to the
Figure 4.9 Effect of heating rates on the thermal decomposition of
pure ammonium perchlorate
heating rates; however, there is a noticeable change in low temperature as well as high
temperature decomposition peak temperature. These peaks shift to higher temperatures
with increase in the heating rates. The onset and peak temperatures for low temperature
and high temperature decomposition stages change significantly when the heating rates
are increased from 2oC/min to 20
oC/min (Table 4.3).
Table 4.3 Effect of heating rate on decomposition peaks
Heating Rate
(oC/min)
Low Temperature Stage High Temperature Stage
Onset Temp (oC) Peak Temp (
oC) Onset Temp (
oC) Peak Temp (
oC)
2
258.7
276.3
326.4
357.9
6 267.8 299.1 338.6 374.2
10 283.9 310.7 342.2 384.1
20 299.5 332.9 357.6 412.1
88
The data presented in Table 4.3 has been used to calculate the kinetic parameters of pure
AP. Representative graph for calculation of the kinetic parameters of low stage
decomposition of AP based on Kissinger method is shown in Figure 4.10(a) while the
graph for calculation of the kinetic parameters of the high temperature decomposition
stage has been shown in Figure 4.10 (b).
Figure 4.10 (a) Kissinger Plot for Low stage decomposition of pure AP
The data points of the plot of ln β/Tp2
against the reciprocal peak temperature ( 1/Tp) fit
into a straight line and the slope of this line gives the value of the activation energy. The
activation energy of AP by Kissinger method has been found to be 103.7kJ/mol and
138.1kJ/mol for low temperature and high temperature decomposition stages
respectively. The data points obtained from the plot of ln β/Tp2
aginst (1/Tp) for the high
temperature decomposition stage also fit into a straight line and the activation energy is
determined from the slope of this line. The corresponding values of frequency factor are
1.17x 107
sec-1
and 6.13x 10
8 sec
-1 for low and high temperature decomposition stages
89
respectively by Kissinger Method. The rate of reaction constant for low temperature stage
is 6.1 x 10-3
sec-1
and for the high temperature stage is 6.41 x 10-3
sec-1
.
Figure.10 (b) Kissinger plot for high stage decomposition of pure AP
The values of activation energy, frequency factor, reaction rate constant and enthalpy of
activation have been presented in Table 4.4 for both the stages separately.
Table 4.4 Summary of Kinetic data of non-catalyzed ammonium perchlorate
Kinetic
Method
Ea (kJ/mol) A* (sec-1
) k(sec-1
) ∆H#
(kJ/mol)
Low High Low High Low High Low High
Kissinger
103.7
138.1
1.17x 107
6.13x 108
6.1 x 10-3
6.41 x 10-3
99.1
132.8
Ozawa 107.6 141.8 2.65x 107 1.01 x10
9 6.2 x 10
-3 6.85 x 10
-3 102.7 136.3
* Values of A, k and ∆H#
have been reported for peak temperature corresponding to heating rate
of 10oC/min temperature
90
The representative graph of Ozawa method for calculation of the kinetic parameters of
low temperature decomposition of AP has been shown in Figure 10 (c).
Figure 4.10 (c) The Ozawa plot for low temperature decomposition
stage of pure AP
The data points obtained from the plot of log β against (1000/Tp) fit into a straight line
and the activation energy is determined from the slope of this line. Similarly, the Ozawa
plot for high temperature decomposition stage of ammonium perchlorate has been
presented in Figure 4.10 (d). The results of the kinetic evaluation of pure AP by Ozawa
method indicate that the activation energy of AP is 107.6 kJ/mol for low temperature
decomposition stage and it is 141.8kJ/mol for high temperature decomposition stage.
These values of the activation energy are slightly different from the ones calculated by
the Kissinger method. The corresponding values of frequency factor, rate of reaction
constant and enthalpy of activation have been presented in Table 4.4 for both the stages
separately for comparison.
91
Figure 4.10 (d) The Ozawa plot for high temperature decomposition
stage of pure AP
Figure 4.10(d) Ozawa plot for high temperature decomposition stage of ammonium
perchlorate
4.9.3 Analysis of Catalyzed AP
The heat flow curve of AP catalyzed with 4 percent MgO nano particles is shown in
Figure 4.11. This curve is quite different from the one for pure AP. A total of two peaks
can be seen from the Figure as opposed to three peaks in case of pure AP. First
endothermic peak which represents the phase change of AP remained unchanged and
appeared almost at the same temperature showing that the catalyst did not interfere much
with the phase transformation of AP. The second peak which is exothermic in nature
represents the rapid decomposition of AP due to addition of MgO. This peak appears at a
temperature of 364oC and shows that the two stages of AP decomposition have now
reduced to one. The decomposition of the catalyzed AP takes place in a single stage at a
temperature which is higher than the low temperature decomposition stage and lower
than the high temperature decomposition stage. The TG curve of the catalyzed AP also
92
confirms this result and a sharp decline in the weight of the sample can be seen in a single
step as opposed to two distinct weight loss steps for pure AP.
Figure 4.11 TG/DTA Curve of AP + 4 Percent MgO
The effect of multiple heating rates on the thermal decomposition of the MgO catalyzed
AP is shown in Figure 4.12.
Figure 4.12 Effect of heating rates on thermal decomposition of AP + 4 Percent MgO
93
The curve shows that the first endothermic peak related to the phase transformation
remains almost unaffected. On the other hand, the decomposition peak shifts to higher
temperatures with increasing heating rates. The decomposition peak temperature
increases from 335oC to 381
oC when the heating rate is increased from 2
oC/min to
20oC/min. The Figure also confirms that two stages of AP decomposition have been
reduced to a single stage in all the cases. This shows that the nano magnesium oxide has a
strong catalytic effect on the thermal decomposition of AP and it is likely to alter the
associated kinetic parameters as well. Peak temperature data at different heating rates
has been used to determine the kinetic parameters of decomposition reaction of catalyzed
AP. The kinetic parameters of AP catalyzed by MgO were estimated by using Kissinger
and Ozawa method for comparison with the kinetic parameters of pure ammonium
perchlorate. Kinetic results obtained by using both the methods confirm that the presence
of magnesium oxide as a catalyst has significantly altered the kinetic parameters and
increased the reactivity of AP.
Figure 4.13(a) Kissinger Plot for decomposition of catalyzed AP
94
Representative graph of Kissinger method for AP+ 4% MgO is shown in fig 4.13(a). The
plot of ln β/Tp2
aginst the reciprocal peak temperature (1/Tp) gives a nearly straight line
and slope of the line gives the activation energy value of 159.1 kJ /mole for the catalyzed
AP. The representative graph of Ozawa method for calculation of the kinetic parameters
of the catalyzed version of AP has been shown in Figure 4.13 (b).
The Figure shows that the data points obtained from the plot of log β against (1000/Tp)
are nearly linear and fit into a straight line and the activation energy is determined from
the slope of this line. The activation energy of the catalyzed AP calculated with Ozawa
method is 161.2kJ/mol and this value is quite close to the one obtained by Kissinger
method. The values of rate of reaction constant, frequency factor, activation energy and
enthalpy of activation for decomposition of the catalyzed version of AP are presented in
Table 4.5 for the sake of comparison.
Figure 4.13(b).Ozawa Plot for the decomposition of catalyzed AP
95
The data shows that the frequency factor has increased tremendously after the addition of
MgO, therefor; the reaction rate constant has also increased. The frequency factor has
been found to be 6.13 x 108
s-1
and 8.7 x1010
s-1
for the pure and catalyzed AP
respectively by the Kissinger method. The rate constant has also increased in the
catalyzed version of AP. The rate constant for the pure and catalyzed AP is 6.41 x 10-3
and 7.85 x 10-3
s-1
respectively as calculated by the Kissinger. This is nearly twenty three
percent increase in the value of the rate constant. The kinetic analysis by the Ozawa
method also showed increase in the values of both the frequency factor and the reaction
rate constant. The frequency factor by Ozawa method was found to be 1.01 x 109 s
-1 for
the pure AP and 1.3 x 1011
s-1
for the catalyzed AP. The rate constant was found to be
6.85 x 10-3
s-1
and 8.1 x 10-3
s-1
respectively for pure and catalyzed AP.
∆
H# is the enthalpy of activation
* Values of A, k and ∆H# have been reported for peak temperature corresponding to
heating rate of 10oC/min temperature.
4.9.4 Comparison of thermal and Kinetic Parameters
There is a noticeable difference in the thermal behavior and kinetic parameters of pure
and catalyzed ammonium perchlorate. The heat flow curve of pure AP shows one
endothermic and two exothermic peaks. Whereas, the addition of nano particles of MgO
reduces two exothermic peaks of AP decomposition to one peak showing that both the
stages have merged and the decomposition takes place in single stage. Moreover, the
DTA results indicate that the decomposition peak of the catalyzed AP is quite sharp as
Table 4.5 Summary of Kinetic data of catalyzed ammonium perchlorate
Kinetic Method Ea (kJ/mol) A* (sec-1
) k(sec-1
) ∆H#(kJ/mol)
Kissinger 159.1 8.7x1010
7.85x10-3
153.8
Ozawa 161.2 1.3x 1011
8.1x10-3
155.9
96
compared to the decomposition peak of pure ammonium perchlorate. The decomposition
of the catalyzed AP takes place at a temperature that is higher than the peak temperature
for the low temperature stage but lower than the peak temperature of the high temperature
decomposition stage. The mass loss curve presented in Figure 4.8 shows two distinct
mass loss steps in case of pure AP. However, mass loss curve of the catalyzed AP
presented in Figure 4.11 clearly shows that the mass is lost in a single step confirming
that the two stage decomposition has been reduced to a single stage. The decomposition
of AP in single stage instead of two different stages is likely to make it more suitable as
an oxidizer for energetic formulations. The propellants and pyrotechnic compositions
mainly comprise fuel and the oxidizer besides some other additives. The decomposition
of the oxidizer plays the most important role of providing the oxygen for the combustion
of fuel. The decomposition of the oxidizer in a single stage is therefore advantageous for
getting the optimal results. The comparison of results obtained by thermal analysis
shows that the addition of MgO does not have any noticeable impact on the endothermic
peak related to the phase transformation of AP. The decomposition peak of the catalyzed
AP is quite sharp as compared to the DTA peak for pure ammonium perchlorate.
The effect of multiple heating rates on the thermal decomposition of pure and catalyzed
AP has been presented in Figures 4.9 and 4.12 respectively. The results indicate that in
both the cases the decomposition peak temperatures of the AP shift to higher values when
the heating rates are increased. This kind of trend is very common in the field of thermal
analysis. The peak decomposition temperature of the low temperature stage of pure AP
increases from 276.3oC to 332.9
oC when the heating rates are increased from 2
oC/min to
20oC/min. Whereas, the peak decomposition temperature of the high temperature stage of
pure AP increases from 357.9oC to 412.1
oC when the heating rates are increased from
2oC/min to 20
oC/min.
Data presented in Table 4.4 and 4.5 shows that the activation energy of catalyzed AP is
higher than pure AP. The activation energy value increases from 138.1kJ/mol to
159.1kJ/mol for the high temperature decomposition stage of ammonium perchlorate as
calculated by Kissinger method. Similarly, the activation energy values of AP increase
97
from 14.8kJ/mol to 161.2kJ/mol for the high temperature decomposition stage of
ammonium perchlorate as calculated by the Ozawa method. Increase in activation energy
apparently means that the AP after addition of catalyst has become difficult to
decompose. It is generally observed that the addition of catalyst lowers the activation
energy; however, this effect may differ from case to case. Some researchers have
reported contrary to this observation based on the experimental results where the
activation energy of ammonium perchlorate has increased due to the addition of the
catalyst [32,42]. The rate of reaction, however, has increased despite increase in the
activation energy in the present work due to the addition of catalyst. This is considered to
be due to the reason that the rate of reaction is directly proportional to the frequency
factor (A). In our case frequency factor has increased significantly, therefore, the overall
rate of reaction has also increased.
The kinetic calculation by Kissinger method show that the value of frequency factor
increased from 6.13 x 108
s-1
to 8.7 x1010
s-1
due to the addition of MgO as a catalyst for
high temperature decomposition stage of AP. This is nearly two orders of magnitude
increase in the value of the frequency factor. This huge increase in the frequency factor
increases the overall reactivity of catalyzed AP despite increase in the activation energy.
The rate of reaction constant of catalyzed AP is 7.85 x 10-3
s-1
as compared to 6.41 x 10-3
s-1
for Pure AP showing that addition of nano particles of MgO has increased the overall
reactivity. These results indicate that the reaction rate constant has increased by nearly 23
percent by the addition of 4 percent MgO. Moreover, the catalyzed AP gives higher value
of the enthalpy of activation. The kinetic results obtained by the Ozawa method show
that the frequency factor increased from 1.01 x 109 s
-1 for the pure AP to 1.3 x 10
11 s
-1 for
the catalyzed AP. This is also two orders of magnitude change in the value of the
frequency factor. The reaction rate constant of the catalyzed AP calculted by Ozawa
method was also found increased to 8.1 x 10-3
s-1
from 6.85 x 10-3
s-1
for the pure AP.
4.10 Conclusions
Catalytic effect of MgO nano particles on the thermal decomposition and kinetic
parameters of ammonium perchlorate has been investigated by using simultaneous
98
thermal analysis including DTA and TG. MgO nano particles were characterized using
SEM and XRD. The particles were found to be elliptical in shape and showed regularity
in their shape. The average size of the nano particles measured from SEM images was
found to be between 20-30 nm. The experimental results confirm that the MgO nano
particles had a strong catalytic effect on the thermal decomposition of ammonium
perchlorate as well as on the associated kinetic parameters. The following important
changes were observed in the thermal and kinetic behaviour of the AP due to addition of
the nano catalyst. The DTA peaks reduced from three to two in the catalyzed version of
AP. The main decomposition peak in case of catalyzed AP was found to be sharp as
compared to the one for pure AP. The two distinct decomposition stages of the pure AP
decomposition merged with each other and reduced to a single stage. The TG curve also
showed single step decomposition. The thermal decomposition of catalyzed AP took
place at a temperature significantly lower than the peak temperature for the high
temperature decomposition of the pure AP but higher than the peak temperature of the
low temperature decomposition. Activation energy of the catalyzed AP was increased by
21kJ/mol from 138.1kJ/mol for pure AP to 159.1kJ/mol for the catalyzed version of AP.
The frequency factor A increased by two orders of magnitude due to the addition of MgO
catalyst. The increase in frequency factor caused nearly twenty three percent increases in
the rate of reaction constant despite increase in the value of activation energy. The
enthalpy of activation has also increased by approximately 16 percent in the catalyzed
version of AP.
References
[1] S. Danali, R. Palaiah, K. Raha, Defence Science Journal 60 (2010) 152.
[2] J.P. Agrawal, High energy materials: propellants, explosives and pyrotechnics,
John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
[3] P. Simoes, L. Pedroso, A. Portugal, J. Campos, Thermochimica acta 319 (1998)
55.
[4] S. Vyazovkin, C.A. Wight, Chemistry of materials 11 (1999) 3386.
99
[5] K.R. Krishnan, R.A. Ammal, B. Hariharanath, A. Rajendran, C. Kartha, Defence
Science Journal 56 (2006) 329.
[6] S. Pourmortazavi, S. Hajimirsadeghi, I. Kohsari, M. Fathollahi, S. Hosseini, Fuel
87 (2008) 244.
[7] D. Ouyang, G. Pan, H. Guan, C. Zhu, X. Chen, Thermochimica Acta 513 (2011)
119.
[8] S.G. Hosseini, S.M. Pourmortazavi, S.S. Hajimirsadeghi, Combustion and flame
141 (2005) 322.
[9] S. Pourmortazavi, S. Hajimirsadeghi, S. Hosseini, Journal of thermal analysis and
calorimetry 84 (2006) 557.
[10] M. Yao, L. Chen, J. Yu, J. Peng, Procedia Engineering 45 (2012) 567.
[11] S.G. Hosseini, A. Eslami, Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry 101 (2010)
1111.
[12] L. Liu, F. Li, L. Tan, L. Ming, Y. Yi, Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 29
(2004) 34.
[13] S. Chaturvedi, P.N. Dave, Journal of Saudi Chemical Society 17 (2013) 135.
[14] A.A. Vargeese, K. Muralidharan, Applied Catalysis A: General 447 (2012) 171.
[15] X. Zhang, X. Chen, M.H. Feng, Z.F. Zheng, G.P. Pan, H.P. Lv, Advanced
Materials Research 550 (2012) 27.
[16] Z.-h. MEI, G.-y. ZENG, H. QIAN, C.-x. Lü, Chinese Journal of Energetic
Materials 1 (2011) 008.
[17] S. Brown, E.L. Charsley, S. Goodall, P.G. Laye, J.J. Rooney, T.T. Griffiths,
Thermochimica acta 401 (2003) 53.
[18] I. Tuukkanen, S. Brown, E.L. Charsley, S. Goodall, P.G. Laye, J.J. Rooney, T.T.
Griffiths, H. Lemmetyinen, Thermochimica acta 426 (2005) 115.
[19] A. Eslami, S. Hosseini, S. Pourmortazavi, Fuel 87 (2008) 3339.
[20] P.W.M. Jacobs, H. Whitehead, Chemical Reviews 69 (1969) 551.
[21] J.A. Conkling, C. Mocella, Chemistry of Pyrotechnics: Basic Principles and
Theory, CRC Press, 1985.
[22] G.P. Sutton, O. Biblarz, Rocket propulsion elements, John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
100
[23] P.R. Patil, V.e.N. Krishnamurthy, S.S. Joshi, Propellants, Explosives,
Pyrotechnics 33 (2008) 266.
[24] M. Rajić, M. Sućeska, Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry 63 (2000) 375.
[25] V. Boldyrev, Thermochimica acta 443 (2006) 1.
[26] D. Majda, A. Korobov, U. Filek, B. Sulikowski, P. Midgley, D. Vowles, J.
Klinowski, Chemical Physics Letters 454 (2008) 233.
[27] R. Gonçalves, J. Rocco, K. Iha, Thermal decomposition kinetics of aged solid
propellant based on ammonium perchlorate–AP/HTPB binder. 44th
AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Hartford, CT, USA, 21–
23 July, 2008.
[28] L. Bircumshaw, B. Newman, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series
A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 227 (1955) 228.
[29] A. Said, R. Al-Qasmi, Thermochimica acta 275 (1996) 83.
[30] M. Zou, X. Jiang, L. Lu, X. Wang, Journal of hazardous materials (2012).
[31] D. Majda, A. Korobov, U. Filek, B. Sulikowski, P. Midgley, D.A. Nicol, J.
Klinowski, Chemical Physics Letters 504 (2011) 185.
[32] P.R. Patil, V.e.N. Krishnamurthy, S.S. Joshi, Propellants, Explosives,
Pyrotechnics 31 (2006) 442.
[33] G. Duan, X. Yang, J. Chen, G. Huang, L. Lu, X. Wang, Powder technology 172
(2007) 27.
[34] S. Vyazovkin, Analytical chemistry 74 (2002) 2749.
[35] A. Eslami, S.G. Hosseini, M. Bazrgary, Journal of thermal analysis and
calorimetry 113 (2013) 721.
[36] L.V. Kakumanu, N. Yadav, S. Karmakar, (2014).
[37] H.E. Kissinger, Analytical chemistry 29 (1957) 1702.
[38] S. Vyazovkin, C.A. Wight, Thermochimica acta 340 (1999) 53.
[39] M. Sunitha, C. Reghunadhan Nair, K. Krishnan, K. Ninan, Thermochimica acta
374 (2001) 159.
[40] B. Janković, M. Marinović-Cincović, M.D. Dramićanin, (2013).
[41] E. Santacesaria, S. Carra, Reaction Kinetics and Catalysis Letters 5 (1976) 317.
[42] F. Solymosi, T. Bansagi, Kinet. Catal 4 (1963) 73.
101
Chapter 5
Thermal and kinetic evaluation of some
magnesium and aluminum fuelled
pyrotechnic compositions
5.1 Introduction
The work presented in this chapter reports the experimental results concerning the
thermal decomposition, ignition and kinetic parameters of three different pyrotechnic
compositions containing either aluminum or magnesium as a metallic fuel. The
pyrotechnic compositions are generally made up of some kind of fuel and one or more
oxidizers. The pyrotechnic compositions are used for both military and civilian
applications and the reactions produce special effects such as heat, light, sound and
coloration [1-4]. Oxidizers release the oxygen when they are thermally decomposed and
the liberated oxygen then reacts with the fuel releasing heat in the process. Nature of both
the fuel and the oxidizer has an effect on the ignition behavior and the reliability of the
pyrotechnic composition [5,6]. The reaction between fuel and the oxidizer in pyrotechnic
composition can be termed as a redox reaction. These reactions can be very effectively
investigated by the use of thermal analysis techniques such as differential thermal
analysis (DTA) and thermogravimetery (TG). Thermal analysis is a safe and effective
tool to monitor the ignition temperatures and the reaction kinetics of the energetic
material due its ability to analyze a small quantity of sample. Different types of energetic
materials including pyrotechnic mixtures are frequently investigated using this technique
[7-13]. The ability of DTA and TG to analyze a very small amount of sample i.e. few
milligrams makes it a very safe and suitable choice for investigation of the energetic
materials including explosives, propellants and pyrotechnics. The safety aspects are given
a special attention while carrying out any kind of analysis of the energetic compositions
102
to avoid the damage to the analytical instrument as well as the operator performing the
analysis.
It is important to mention here that the choice of an oxidizer for use in a certain specific
composition plays an important role on the performance of the pyrotechnic mixture. The
ignition and combustion behaviour of pyrotechnics depends on different factors such as
the oxygen balance, thermal stability and the decomposition temperature of the oxidizer.
High oxygen balance means that the less amount of oxidizer would be required for the
complete combustion of the fuel in any energetic composition. The thermal stability of
the oxidizer is necessary for safe storage and reliable operation of the pyrotechnic
composition formulated with it. The decomposition temperature of the oxidizer bears an
impact on the final ignition of the pyrotechnic mixture. Three different oxidizers have
been used in the present work to formulate the pyrotechnic mixtures containing either
aluminum or magnesium as a fuel. These oxidizers include barium nitrate, potassium
permanganate and ammonium perchlorate. All these oxidizers are used frequently in
different kinds of pyrotechnics [14-20]. Aluminum and magnesium are perhaps the most
widely used metallic fuel in the pyrotechnic compositions which produce a very high
light output. Such compositions are used in making different type of flares as well as in
tracer applications [21,22].
The theory and mechanisms involved in the decomposition reaction of propellants and
explosives are generally well defined, however, there is lack of relevant theory and
experimental data pertaining to the decomposition kinetics of the pyrotechnics [1]. The
aim of the present work is to carry out thermal cum kinetic analysis of three different
pyrotechnic compositions and their ingredients to elucidate the reaction process and
assess the safety and reactivity of these mixtures. The thermal behaviour of the individual
oxidizers and fuels has been discussed before the thermo kinetic behaviour of the actual
mixtures is discussed to have a better idea regarding the mechanism of thermal
decomposition.
The investigated pyrotechnic mixtures include Mg + NH4ClO4, Mg + KMnO4 and Al +
Ba(NO3)2. Thermal and kinetic analysis of Mg + KMnO4 has been reported earlier as well
but the critical ignition temperature has not been reported for this composition [21].
103
Moreover, the thermal cum kinetic investigation and the critical ignition data of
pyrotechnic mixtures based on Al + Ba(NO3)2 and Mg + NH4ClO4 is being reported in
detail in the present work. The kinetic parameters have been estimated using non
isothermal data based on the Kissinger method. The focus in the present work was to
assess the thermal stability and reactivity of the above mentioned compositions so that
their reliability during storage and for operational use could be estimated on the basis of
the thermal, kinetic data obtained in a series of experiments.
5.2 Experimental conditions
The information regarding the chemicals used in the present work has already been
discussed in detail in chapter 2 and therefore only the conditions under which the
experiments were performed have been discussed here. The particle size analysis of the
fuels was carried out to find out their mean size. The average particle size of the
aluminum powder was 20 µm and the average particle size of the magnesium powder
was 24 µm. Laser scattering particle size distribution analyzer LA-920 by HORIBA has
been used for the analysis. The XRD instrument by STOE Germany has been used for
analysis of the end product of the oxidation. All the three oxidizers were sieved through a
300 mesh sieve before mixing with fuel as a pyrotechnic mixture. The fuel and the
oxidizers were mixed in their respective stoichiometric mass ratios. Thermo analytical
instrument by Shimadzu has been used to carry the present research work. TG/DTA
curves of all the ingredients and the mixtures were obtained by using a heating rate of
10°C min-1
. The air atmosphere was used for the analysis of fuels whereas nitrogen gas
was used for the analysis of oxidizers. Alumina pans were used to hold the sample. The
effect of heating rate on the heat flow curve of the pyrotechnic mixtures was analyzed at
four different heating rates i.e. 10°C min-1
, 20°C min-1
, 30°C min-1
and 40°C min-1
. The
sample mass was kept close to 3mg for all the three pyrotechnic mixtures. Nitrogen gas
was used for providing the inert atmosphere and the flow rate of nitrogen was maintained
at 50 ml min-1
.
104
5.3 Results and Discussion
The particle size distribution of both aluminum and magnesium is shown in Figure 5.1
and 5.2 respectively.
Figure 5.1 Particle size distribution of aluminum powder (Davg= 20µm)
Figure 2 Particle size distribution of magnesium powder (Davg= 24µm)
105
The particle size analysis of both the fuels i.e. magnesium and aluminum powder has
been carried out to estimate their average particle size by using the particle size
distribution analyzer. The results indicate that the average particle size of the aluminum
powder was nearly 20 µm whereas; the average particle size of the magnesium powder
was nearly 24 µm.
5.3.1 Thermal analysis of the pyrotechnic ingredients
Although thermal decomposition data of the pyrotechnic ingredients used in this research
work is available in the literature; however, to elucidate the mechanism of decomposition
of pyrotechnic mixtures thoroughly, thermal behaviour of all the ingredients was carried
out under identical experimental conditions.
TG curve of pure magnesium powder is shown in Figure 5.3. The curve shows that the
mass of the sample increases significantly in the temperature range of 400oC to 900
oC
due to oxidation of magnesium to magnesium oxide in the presence of air.
Figure 5.3 TG curve of magnesium powder showing the mass gain due to oxidation
106
The TG curve initially shows a slight mass loss in the temperature range of 200oC to
350oC due to decomposition of magnesium hydroxide and evaporation of the residual
water. The mass gain is quite slow in the temperature range of 350oC to 550
oC. The main
oxidation reaction takes place near 600oC due to ignition of magnesium fuel with
atmospheric oxygen and resulting in a large mass gain. The mass gain slows down after
650oC and oxidation completes near 900
oC. The total mass gain of magnesium powder
was approximately 67 percent which is very close to the theoretical value showing that all
the magnesium has oxidized to MgO as per the following equation.
Mg + ½ O2 → MgO (5.1)
XRD analysis of the residue was also carried out to see the end product of oxidation of
magnesium. The XRD spectra presented in Figure 5.4 shows five distinct diffraction
peaks.
Figure 5.4 XRD spectra of the residue obtained after oxidation of magnesium powder
showing typical MgO peaks
107
The analysis of the data shows that these are the characteristic peaks representing MgO
and match with the reference pattern No 01-074-1225. Miller Indices have been marked
on the peaks. XRD result also confirms the complete oxidation of Mg.
The TG curve of aluminum powder has been shown in Figure 5.5. TG curve shows a
two-step mass gain of aluminum powder to aluminum oxide in the presence of air. The
TG curve shows a very small decrease in the mass of the sample due to removal of water
from the aluminum hydroxide in the temperature range of 200oC to 300
oC. The first stage
of oxidation takes place between temperature ranges of 400oC and 700
oC and results in a
mass gain of about 20%. The mass gain is slow till 800oC and after this temperature the
main oxidation reaction starts with a rapid increase in mass of the sample showing nearly
50% more mass gain up to 1000oC and continues to increase. Complete oxidation of the
sample results in the production of aluminum oxide.
2Al + 3/2O2 → Al2O3 (5.2)
Figure 5.5 TG curve of aluminum powder showing the mass gain due to
oxidation in air
TG/DTA curve of pure barium nitrate is shown in the Figure 5.6. The curve shows that
barium nitrate melts near 592oC showing an endothermic peak. Decomposition of
barium nitrate takes place in a series of overlapping endothermic peaks. The TG curve
108
shows that the decompositions of barium nitrate are associated with 40 percent of mass
loss in the temperature range of 590oC to 700
oC. It decomposes close to 690
oC releasing
oxygen. The decomposition reaction of barium nitrate has been previously reported in
literature and presented below[5,23]:
Ba(NO3)2 → BaO + 2NO+ O2 (5.3)
Figure 5. 6 TG/DTA curve of barium nitrate showing the heat flow and mass loss
curves
The thermal behaviour of ammonium perchlorate is described briefly here as it was
discussed in detail in Chapter 3. First endothermic peak of ammonium perchlorate
appears at 241ºC and it corresponds to a solid phase transformation of ammonium
perchlorate during which its crystal structure changes from orthorhombic to cubic [24-
26]. The next peak is exothermic in nature and appears at 310.7ºC (Table 1). This peak
represents the low temperature decomposition of ammonium perchlorate. The last
exothermic peak appears close to 384.1ºC and depicts the high temperature
decomposition of ammonium perchlorate.
109
Table 5.1 Summary of experimental thermal data
# The temperatures have been mentioned at maximum/minimum heat flux. All of these are
the actual experimental results.
T*
It is the temperature range during which there is a change in the mass of the sample
(increase or decrease).
TG curve confirms the decomposition of ammonium perchlorate in two distinct stages.
The decomposition of ammonium perchlorate yields the following products as reported
by J. A. Conkling and C. Mocella in their book “Chemistry of pyrotechnics: basic
principles and theory” [2].
2NH4ClO4 → N2+ 3H2O+2HCl+2.5O2 (5.4)
The data obtained from the DTA curve of potassium permanganate indicates two distinct
peaks (represented in chapter 3). First peak is exothermic in nature that starts with the
melting of the sample and appears at a temperature of 284oC. This peak represents the
decomposition of potassium permanganate and is associated with a mass loss. Second
peak appearing near 511ºC is endothermic in nature and represents high temperature
decomposition stage of potassium permanganate. The TG curve also shows a slight mass
loss corresponding to this peak.
S.No Composition Mass Ratio
(Percentage)
Fusion Temp#
(oC)
Decomposition
Temp# (
oC)
T*(
oC)
1 Ba(NO3)2 100 592 690 580-700
2 NH4ClO4 100 ------ 310 280-410
3 KMnO4 100 ------ 284 240-290
4 Al + Ba(NO3)2 17/83 569 601 550-620
5 Mg + NH4ClO4 34/66 ----- 338 330-380
6 Mg + KMnO4 18/82 ------ 292 260-320
110
5.3.2 Thermal analysis of the pyrotechnic compositions
The heat flow curve of Al + Ba(NO3)2 pyrotechnic composition is shown in Figure 5.7.
The curve depicts that mixture melts close to 569oC. This temperature is lower than the
melting point of both the fuel and the oxidizer. This is thought be due to mechanism of
solid state reaction during which the more reactive ingredient of the mixture (fuel in this
case) migrates to the oxidation interface [21]. Just after melting, the pyrotechnic mixture
decomposes exothermically at a temperature of 601oC and ignition of the fuel and
oxidizer takes place. TG curve remains stable until melting of the mixture and then it
shows a mass loss of approximately 20 percent. Such a behavior of the TG curve means
that the pyrotechnic mixture is highly stable till its melting temperature. The oxidation
reaction between fuel and oxidant is shown below.
2 Al + Ba(NO3)2 → BaO + 2 NO+ Al2O3 (5.5)
Figure 5.7 TG/DTA curve of Al + Ba(NO3)2 pyrotechnic composition showing the
mass loss and heat flow curves
111
The heat flow curve of Mg + NH4ClO4 pyrotechnic mixture shows an endothermic peak
at 254oC (Figure 5.8). This peak is due to the phase change in ammonium perchlorate and
takes place at a slightly higher temperature than pure ammonium perchlorate. This
pyrotechnic mixture does not melt prior to decomposition. There is a sharp exothermic
peak at 338oC which represents the decomposition of this pyrotechnic mixture without
melting. TG curve does not show any mass loss until the fuel and oxidizer mixture
ignites. The decomposition is associated with nearly 17 percent mass loss in the
temperature range of 330oC to 380
oC. It is postulated that the oxygen released due to the
decomposition of ammonium perchlorate reacts with the magnesium fuel and ignites the
pyrotechnic mixture. The oxidation reaction between the fuel and oxidizer is represented
below.
5 Mg + 2 NH4ClO4 → 5 MgO + 3 H2O+ 2 HCl + N2 (5.6)
Figure 5.8 TG/DTA curve of Mg + NH4ClO4 pyrotechnic composition showing the
mass loss and heat flow curves
112
The heat flow curve of Mg + KMnO4 has been shown in Figure 5.9. A single exothermic
peak of the mixture can be seen near a temperature of 292oC and there is no thermal
event prior to this peak. The exothermic peak represents the decomposition of the
pyrotechnic mixture. This pyrotechnic mixture does not show any kind of phase
transformation or melting before the decomposition. The reaction between the two has
been reported as follows [21].
Mg +2KMnO4 → MgO + K2O+ 2MnO2 +O2 (5.7)
Potassium permanganate decomposes to release oxygen and oxidizes the metal fuel to
form MgO. There is no variation in the TG curve till the melting of the oxidizer near
240oC. The TG curve shows approximately 11 percent mass loss in the temperature
range of 260oC - 320
oC.
Figure 5.9 TG/DTA curve of Mg + KMnO4 pyrotechnic composition showing the
mass loss and heat flow curves
113
5.3.3 Variation in peak temperatures at multiple heating rates
The effect of heating rates on the heat flow curves has been used to calculate the kinetic
parameters of the pyrolants. Standard ASTM method was used for determination of the
kinetic parameters based on the multiple heating rate experiments and employing
Kissinger method. The DTA experiments were carried out as per the guidelines given by
the international committee of thermal analysis and calorimetry (ICTAC)[27]. The effect
of heating rates is similar in all the three pyrotechnic mixtures in the sense that the
decomposition peaks shift to higher temperatures with increase in the heating rate as seen
in Figures 5.10 (a), 5.10 (b) and 5.10 (c). The effect of heating rates on the decomposition
peaks of mixture containing Al and Ba(NO3)2 is shown in Figure 5.10 (a) and the results
are presented in Table 5.2.
Table 5.2 Effect of heating rate on the decomposition peak temperature of the
pyrotechnic mixtures
S.NO Composition Heating rate
(oC min
-1)
Peak Temp
(oC)
1
Al + Ba(NO3)2
10
600.6
20 624.9
30 641.6
40 655.7
2 Mg + NH4ClO4 10 338.1
20 346.4
30 352.5
40 358.1
3 Mg + KMnO4 10 292.5
20 302.9
30 310.8
40 319.5
114
The decomposition temperature of the mixture increases from 601oC to 656
oC when the
heating rate increases from 10oC/min to 40
oC/min. The effect of heating rate for the
mixture containing Mg and NH4ClO4 is shown in Figure 10(b). The data presented in
Table 5.2 shows that the peak temperatures increase from 338oC to 358
oC when the
heating rate increases from 10oC/min to 40
oC/min. Similarly the effect of heating rate on
the thermal decomposition of the mixture containing Mg and KMnO4 is presented in
Figure 10 (c).
Figure 5.10(a)Effect of heating rate on thermal decomposition of mixture containing Al
and Ba(NO3)2
The data presented in Table 5.2 shows that the peak temperatures increase from 292oC to
319oC when the heating rate increases from 10
oC/min to 40
oC/min. Ideally speaking, the
heating rate should not have an effect on the melting peak of the mixture; however,
Figure 10 (a) shows that the melting peaks also shifted to higher temperatures with
increasing heating rate. This is thought to be due to non-uniform heating of the sample
caused by the thermal lag phenomena. The sample is exposed for less time to the specific
heating range at higher heating rates. Similar effect of increase in the melting peak
temperature due to increasing of the heating rate for pyrotechnics and other mixtures has
been reported by other researchers as well [5,14]. The shift in the peak temperatures
115
caused by the heating rate has been used to calculate the kinetic parameters using
Kissinger method.
Figure 5.10(b) Effect of heating rate on thermal decomposition of mixture
containing Mg and NH4ClO4
Figure 5.10(c) Effect of heating rate on thermal decomposition of mixture
containing Mg and KMnO4
116
5.3.4 Kinetic evaluation of the mixtures
Kinetics is an important aspect in the study of decomposition reactions. Evaluation of
thermal and kinetic stability of energetic materials is mandatory to access their reactivity
and thermal stability during processing, handling, storage and operation. Various
methods have been reported in literature for calculation of the kinetic parameters. In this
case, kinetic parameters of the pyrotechnic compositions have been determined by using
non isothermal data based on the Kissinger method [28]. The detailed description of the
Kissinger method for evaluation of the kinetic parameters from heat flow data has been
presented in chapter 2.
The heat flow data obtained by multiple heating rates experiments was used to construct
the Kissinger plot of (
) versus
. The data points are nearly linear and fit into a
straight line. The slope of the graph based on the above mentioned relationship is used to
calculate the value of activation energy. The plots of (
) against the reciprocal peak
temperature based on Kissinger method are shown in Figure 5.11(a),5.11(b) and 5.11(c)
for compositions comprising Al + Ba(NO3)2 , Mg + NH4ClO4 and Mg + KMnO4. The
kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of the pyrotechnic mixtures have been presented
in Table 5.3.
Table 5.3 Kinetic parameters of pyrotechnic mixtures
*Tb is the critical ignition temperature.
Composition E
(kJmol-1
)
Frequency
factor A (s-1
)
Reaction
Constant k(s-1
)
(kJmol-1
)
*Tb (oC)
Al + Ba(NO3)2
155.9 + 4 %
8.58x106
4.0 x 10-3
148.6
599.2
Mg + NH4ClO4 214.3 + 7 % 2.38x1016
11.5 x 10-3
209.2 338.4
Mg + KMnO4 134.6 +10 % 2.28x1010
8.4 x 10-3
129.9 289.3
117
Important thermo dynamic parameters known as enthalpy of activation have been
calculated using the relationship shown in equation (5.8) [29].
(5.8)
Figure 5.11 (a) Kissinger plot for determination of activation energy of pyrotechnic
composition containing Al + Ba(NO3)2
Kinetic analysis of the mixture containing Al and Ba(NO3)2 shows that the activation
energy of this mixture is 156kJ/mol. The frequency factor for this mixture is nearly
8.58x106s
-1. The reaction rate constant is nearly 4.0 x 10
-3s
-1. The Kinetic analysis of the
mixture containing Mg and NH4ClO4 shows that the activation energy of this mixture is
214kJ/mol. This mixture has the highest value of the activation energy amongst the three
mixtures. The frequency factor for this mixture is nearly 2.38x1016
s-1
it is quite high. It is
due to such a high value of frequency factor that the reaction rate constant of this mixture
118
Figure 5.11 (b) Kissinger plot for determination of activation energy of pyrotechnic
composition containing Mg + NH4ClO4
Figure 5.11 (c) Kissinger plot for determination of activation energy of pyrotechnic
composition containing Mg + KMnO4
119
is the highest and it is nearly 11.5 x 10-3
s-1
. The rate constant of this mixture is the
highest. Kinetic analysis of the mixture containing Mg and KMnO4 shows that the
activation energy of this mixture is close to 135kJ/mol. The mixture has the lowest value
of the activation energy amongst the three compositions. The frequency factor for this
mixture is nearly 2.28x1010
s-1
. The reaction rate constant is nearly 8.4 x 10-3
s-1
. The
reaction constant in this case is higher than the mixture containing Al and Ba(NO3)2 but
lower than the mixture containing Mg and NH4ClO4.
5.3.5 Estimation of critical ignition temperature
It is the described as the minimum temperature up to which the energetic materials can be
heated without the risk of runaway reaction [30,31]. Critical ignition temperature is often
estimated by researchers working on energetic materials using thermo kinetic parameters
obtained from heat flow data and employing the equations (5.9) and (5.10). This
approach is now being commonly used for quite some time to estimate the critical
ignition temperature on the basis of DSC/DTA data [32,33].
√
(5.9)
(5.10)
Where is the critical ignition temperature , E is the activation energy, R is the gas
constant, is the onset temperature corresponding to → 0 approximated using
regression coefficients b and c.
Critical ignition temperature Tb is an important parameter to determine the safety and
stability of energetic materials for their safe handling during the storage and operation.
The pyrotechnic compositions are considered to be safe for storage, handling and
operation if this temperature is sufficiently higher than the maximum possible ambient
temperature. The maximum possible ambient temperatures during storage are generally
120
up to 70oC. The values of have been calculated by using equation (5.10) from the
temperature data at multiple heating rates and using the linear regression formula.
The values of obtained in this case are 585.2oC, 332.3
oC and 284.2
oC respectively for
the pyrotechnic mixtures containing Al / Ba(NO3)2, Mg /NH4ClO4 and Mg /KMnO4
respectively. The values of critical ignition temperatures calculated using the above
mentioned values of are 599.2oC, 338.4
oC and 289.3
oC respectively for mixtures
based on Al / Ba(NO3)2, Mg /NH4ClO4 and Mg /KMnO4. The data is presented in Table
5.3.
5.3.6 Comparative analysis of the kinetic data and ignition temperatures
Thermal decomposition, ignition and kinetic analysis of three pyrotechnic mixtures has
been carried out in this work. The main focus in the present work was to determine the
thermal stability and relative reactivity of the three different pyrotechnic mixtures
containing fuel and oxidizers. The kinetic analysis of two pyrotechnic compositions
containing Mg/NH4ClO4 and Al / Ba (NO3) has not been reported earlier to the best of
our knowledge. The kinetic analysis of the third composition containing Mg and KMnO4
however has been reported earlier as well by S.M. Pourmortazavi et al [21].
The data presented in Table 3 shows that pyrotechnic mixture based on Mg and KMnO4
has the minimum value of the activation energy and enthalpy of activation as compared
to the other two investigated mixtures. The critical ignition temperature of this
composition has been found to be found to be 289.3oC which is the lowest amongst the
three compositions depicting that it is the least stable composition out of above
mentioned compositions. However, even this value of critical ignition temperature is
fairly higher than the normally encountered storage and operational temperature and
therefore it is considered to be thermally stable for handling, storage and operation. The
values of activation energy and enthalpy of activation calculated in our work are 134.6
kJmol-1
and 129.9 kJmol-1
respectively that are very close to the reported values of
135KJmol-1 and 130 kJmol-1
by S.M. Pourmortazavi et al. However, the critical ignition
temperature in our case is 289.3oC which is not reported in the earlier work.
121
The comparison of data presented in Table 5.3 for the three compositions investigated in
this work shows that the activation energy of the mixture containing Mg and KMnO4 has
the lowest value amongst these three mixtures. It means that this composition is relatively
easy to ignite and requires less amount of energy for its ignition. The activation energy of
the mixture containing Al and Ba(NO3)2 is nearly 156 kJ/mol and it is higher than the
activation energy of the former mixture. The activation energy of the mixture containing
Mg and NH4ClO4 is the highest amongst the three mixtures i.e.214kJ/mol. This mixture is
therefore difficult to ignite as compared to the others.
It is obligatory to mention here that mixture containing the ammonium perchlorate as the
oxidizer of magnesium requires more activation energy and relatively difficult to ignite as
compared to the one containing potassium permanganate as the oxidizer. It is therefore
evident that the replacement of the ammonium perchlorate with potassium per magnate as
the oxidant of the magnesium fuel lowers the ignition temperature as well as the
activation energy.
The comparison of the data shows that the frequency factor of the composition containing
aluminum fuel and barium nitrate as oxidant is the lowest. The frequency factor for this
composition is nearly 8.58x106s
-1. The frequency factor of composition containing
ammonium perchlorate is the highest and its value is nearly 2.38x1016
s-1
. The frequency
factor of the composition containing potassium permanganate is lower than the one
containing ammonium perchlorate but higher than the one containing barium nitrate. Its
value was found to be nearly 2.28x1010
s-1
.
It would not be out of place to mention here that the frequency factor plays a vital role in
determining the rate constant. It is perhaps equally important from kinetics point of view
as the activation energy. The activation energy alone can only predict the ease or
difficulty of ignition of any investigated composition but it does not give any information
regarding the rate at which that reaction proceeds unless the frequency factor is known.
An interesting comparison between the two compositions based on Mg + NH4ClO4 and
Mg + KMnO4 will give a fair idea regarding the importance of the frequency factor. The
122
activation energy of the composition congaing ammonium perchlorate is nearly 58
percent higher than the mixture containing potassium permanganate. However, despite
such a high value of activation energy the rate constant of pyrotechnic mixture containing
NH4ClO4 is nearly 37 percent higher than mixture containing KMnO4. The main reason
for this is that the high value of the frequency factor that increases the overall reactivity.
Similarly, the reaction rate constant of the mixture containing barium nitrate is the lowest
despite relatively lower activation energy as compared to the mixture containing
ammonium perchlorate.
The comparison of the reaction rate data shows that composition based on Al + Ba(NO3)2
is the least reactive amongst the three with rate constant value of 4.0 x 10-3
s-1
. The
composition based on Mg /KMnO4 is more reactive with the rate constant value of 8.4 x
10-3
s-1
and the composition based on Mg + NH4ClO4 is the most reactive of the three
with rate constant value of 11.5 x 10-3
s-1
. Relative reactivity of these mixtures has been
found to obey the following order: Mg + NH4ClO4 > Mg + KMnO4 > Al + Ba(NO3)2 on
the basis of above mentioned discussion and the data presented in Table 5.3. The
enthalpy of activation of the three mixtures is nearly149 kJ/mol, 209 kJ/mol and 129.9
kJ/mol for compositions containing Al + Ba(NO3)2, Mg + NH4ClO4 and Mg + KMnO4
respectively.
The thermal stability of the mixtures can be assessed by the value of the critical ignition
temperatures. The pyrotechnic composition based on Al + Ba(NO3)2 has the highest value
of critical ignition temperature i.e. 599.2oC and can be regarded as the most stable
compositions amongst the three. The rate of reaction constant for this composition is the
lowest and therefore it is considered to be as the least reactive composition out of the
above mentioned compositions. The pyrotechnic composition based on Mg + KMnO4
has the lowest value of critical ignition temperature i.e. 289.3oC and can be regarded as
the least stable compositions amongst the three. It is reemphasized here that even this
value of critical ignition temperature is sufficiently higher than the ambient temperatures
and therefore the composition is thermally stable even though it is less stable in
comparison to the other two compositions.
123
The pyrotechnic composition based on Mg + NH4ClO4 has the critical ignition
temperature of 338.4oC and can be regarded as a stable pyrotechnic composition.
Moreover, the rate of reaction constant for this composition is the highest and therefore it
is considered to be as the most reactive composition out of the above mentioned
compositions.
Thermal and kinetic analysis of pyrotechnic compositions provides meaningful
information regarding different mechanism involved in the decomposition process.
Moreover, the kinetic data along with the critical ignition temperature is helpful in
determining the safety and stability of the pyrotechnic compositions during storage,
handling and operation. The kinetic evaluation of different fuel/oxidant mixtures can help
resolve the safety issues associated with the pyrotechnics to avoid accidental initiation.
5.4 Conclusions
The evaluation of thermal stability and reactivity of any pyrotechnic composition is
mandatory to ensure its safety and reliability during storage, handling, transportation and
operation. Experimental investigation of the thermal and kinetic behaviour of three
pyrotechnic compositions based on aluminum and magnesium fuel has been carried out
to elucidate the decomposition process and to evaluate the stability and reactivity. The
experimental results and the kinetic data of the pyrotechnic mixture containing Al /
Ba(NO3)2 depict that the mixture melts close to a temperature of 569oC and decomposes
exothermically at 601oC showing the ignition of the fuel. There is no thermal event prior
to melting which means that the pyrotechnic mixture is highly stable till its melting
temperature. The mixture is least reactive amongst the three investigated mixtures and it
has the lowest value of the reaction rate constant. The mixture is most stable thermally
due to highest value of its critical ignition temperature i.e. nearly 599oC.The mixture has
a moderate value of the activation energy which is nearly 156kJ/mol.
The experimental results and the kinetic data of the pyrotechnic mixture containing Mg/
NH4ClO4 revealed that the heat flow curve of pyrotechnic mixture shows an endothermic
peak at 254oC representing the phase change of AP. The mixture does not melt and
124
decomposes exothermically near 338oC showing the ignition of the magnesium fuel. The
mixture has the highest value of activation energy amongst the three compositions and
therefore it is relatively difficult to ignite. Once ignited the mixture is very reactive and
has the highest value of the reaction rate constant. The mixture is thermally very stable
and has a fairly high value of the critical ignition temperature.
The experimental results and the kinetic data of the pyrotechnic mixture containing
Mg/KMnO4 depict that there is no thermal event such as phase change or melting in this
mixture prior to its decomposition. The mixture decomposes exothermically at 292oC
depicting the ignition of the magnesium fuel. It is the least stable pyrotechnic
composition amongst the three and has the lowest value of the critical ignition
temperature. The mixture is very easy to ignite as it has the lowest value of activation
energy. The mixture is fairly reactive and its rate constant is higher than the mixture
containing barium nitrate but lower than the one containing ammonium perchlorate.
The upshot of the above discussion is that all the three compositions investigated in the
present work are thermally stable and the relative reactivity of these pyrotechnic mixtures
decreases in the following order:
Mg + NH4ClO4 > Mg + KMnO4 > Al + Ba(NO3)2
References
[1] S. Danali, R. Palaiah, K. Raha, Defence Science Journal 60 (2010) 152.
[2] J.A. Conkling, C. Mocella, Chemistry of Pyrotechnics: Basic Principles and
Theory, CRC Press, 1985.
[3] M. Brown, Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry 65 (2001) 323.
[4] X. Kang, J. Zhang, Q. Zhang, K. Du, Y. Tang, Journal of thermal analysis and
calorimetry 109 (2012) 1333.
[5] A. Eslami, S. Hosseini, S. Pourmortazavi, Fuel 87 (2008) 3339.
[6] S.G. Hosseini, S.M. Pourmortazavi, S.S. Hajimirsadeghi, Combustion and flame
141 (2005) 322.
125
[7] S. ZEMAN, Q.-L. YAN, M. VLČEK, Central European Journal of Energetic
Materials 11 (2014) 173.
[8] K.R. Krishnan, R.A. Ammal, B. Hariharanath, A. Rajendran, C. Kartha, Defence
Science Journal 56 (2006) 329.
[9] M. Yao, L. Chen, J. Yu, J. Peng, Procedia Engineering 45 (2012) 567.
[10] S. Brown, E.L. Charsley, S. Goodall, P.G. Laye, J.J. Rooney, T.T. Griffiths,
Thermochimica acta 401 (2003) 53.
[11] I. Tuukkanen, E.L. Charsley, S. Goodall, P.G. Laye, J.J. Rooney, T.T. Griffiths,
H. Lemmetyinen, Thermochimica acta 443 (2006) 116.
[12] S. Pourmortazavi, S. Hosseini, M. Rahimi-Nasrabadi, S. Hajimirsadeghi, H.
Momenian, Journal of hazardous materials 162 (2009) 1141.
[13] S. Pourmortazavi, S. Hajimirsadeghi, S. Hosseini, Journal of thermal analysis and
calorimetry 84 (2006) 557.
[14] S.G. Hosseini, A. Eslami, Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry 101 (2010)
1111.
[15] L. Liu, F. Li, L. Tan, L. Ming, Y. Yi, Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 29
(2004) 34.
[16] X. Zhang, X. Chen, M.H. Feng, Z.F. Zheng, G.P. Pan, H.P. Lv, Advanced
Materials Research 550 (2012) 27.
[17] M.W. Beck, M.E. Brown, Thermochimica acta 65 (1983) 197.
[18] J.J. Granier, M.L. Pantoya, Combustion and Flame 138 (2004) 373.
[19] Y. Wang, J. Zhu, X. Yang, L. Lu, X. Wang, Thermochimica Acta 437 (2005) 106.
[20] E.C. Koch, D. Clement, Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 32 (2007) 205.
[21] S. Pourmortazavi, S. Hajimirsadeghi, I. Kohsari, M. Fathollahi, S. Hosseini, Fuel
87 (2008) 244.
[22] C. Lăzăroaie, S. Eşanu, C. Său, R. Petre, P.-Z. Iordache, G. Staikos, T. Rotariu, T.
Zecheru, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 115 (2014) 1407.
[23] O.Q. González, J.L. Burell, E. Martínez, C. Barrera, R. Acosta, N. Ruiz, Revista
Cubana de Química 16 (2010).
[24] A. Said, R. Al-Qasmi, Thermochimica acta 275 (1996) 83.
[25] M. Rajić, M. Sućeska, Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry 63 (2000) 375.
126
[26] P.W.M. Jacobs, H. Whitehead, Chemical Reviews 69 (1969) 551.
[27] S. Vyazovkin, A.K. Burnham, J.M. Criado, L.A. Pérez-Maqueda, C. Popescu, N.
Sbirrazzuoli, Thermochimica Acta 520 (2011) 1.
[28] H.E. Kissinger, Analytical chemistry 29 (1957) 1702.
[29] A. Eslami, Thermochimica acta 409 (2004) 189.
[30] J.M. Pickard, Thermochimica acta 392 (2002) 37.
[31] T. Kotoyori, Journal of loss prevention in the process industries 2 (1989) 16.
[32] F.-q. ZHAO, R.-z. HU, H. ZHANG, H.-x. GAO, H.-a. ZHAO, H.-x. MA,
Chemical Research in Chinese Universi-ties 26 (2010) 829.
[33] J.-T. Wu, J.-G. Zhang, M. Sun, X. Yin, T.-L. Zhang, Central European Journal of
Energetic Materials 10 (2013).
127
Chapter 6
Thermal decomposition of the magnesium
fueled pyrotechnic compositions and the
effect of accelerated aging
6.1 Introduction
The work presented in this chapter reports the experimental results concerning the
thermal decomposition and kinetic parameters of two military pyrotechnic compositions
containing magnesium fuel. The focus in the present work was to qualitatively identify
the effect of the accelerated aging by storing the compositions at high temperature and
humidity levels. The investigated pyrotechnic compositions viz. SR-524 and SR-562
are used in various military applications. The SR-524 pyrotechnic composition contains
magnesium fuel and sodium nitrate is the oxidizer. The SR-562 pyrotechnic composition
contains magnesium, sodium nitrate and calcium oxalate.
The pyrotechnic mixtures are typically made up of finely divided metallic or nonmetallic
fuel and inorganic oxidizers. These compositions are used to produce some special
effects like light, heat, sound and colours in various military and civilian applications [1-
4]. The fuel reacts with the oxygen that is released when the oxidizer is thermally
decomposed and heat is released in this process. The ignition behaviour of the
pyrotechnics depends on nature of the fuel as well as the oxidizer [5,6]. The performance
of the pyrotechnic mixtures is affected by many factors including humidity, temperature,
impact and thermal shock [7]. The investigation of the aging behaviour of the
pyrotechnics is important to identify different physical and chemical changes that may
have a detrimental effect on the ignition behaviour of the pyrotechnics. The changes
caused by the aging process may lead to the poor performance of the pyrotechnic
composition and it may not produce the desired output. In certain cases, the composition
128
may even fail to ignite [8]. On the other hand, some of the changes may lead to the
accidental initiation of these compositions and many accidents have been reported in the
past during the processing, handling and storage [9].
Extensive exposure of the energetic materials to high levels of humidity and elevated
temperatures is detrimental and likely to deteriorate their performance. The stability of
different materials such as pyrotechnics, propellants and polymers is known to have been
seriously affected by high humidity. The effect of high temperatures and high humidity
levels on aging process of the pyrotechnics and propellants has been investigated by
many researchers [10-15].
Guo et al. investigated the effect of moisture content on the thermal behaviour and
stability of propellants [16]. The authors reported that moisture content in the form of
different high humidity levels played an important role in changing the reaction
mechanism of the propellant and also reported that low humidity levels did not affect the
reaction. Similarly I.M Tuukkanen et al. investigated the effect of aging on magnesium-
strontium nitrate pyrotechnic composition and reported that the decomposition
temperature of the aged composition lowered by 17oC and the reaction product of the
aging were strontium nitrite and magnesium hydroxide [17]. The authors also reported
that the overall reactivity of the pyrotechnic mixture increased after aging in contrast to
the generally expected behaviour of decreasing reactivity due to aging.
Liqiong Wang et al. reported the effect of temperature and humidity on the thermal
behaviour of pyrotechnic compositions containing the strontium nitrate. The authors
showed that the critical temperature of thermal explosion decreased as the humidity
levels were increased and that both the high humidity and high temperature have a strong
influence on the thermal behaviour and kinetics of the investigated pyrotechnic mixtures
[7].
In this case we have investigated the effect of aging on two military pyrotechnic
compositions. The pyrotechnic composition SR-524 is used as a tracer. It contains
magnesium as a fuel and sodium nitrate is used as an oxidizer. The pyrotechnic
129
composition SR-562 is used as a flare. It is based on the magnesium fuel and contains
calcium oxalate and sodium nitrate as the oxidizers. The magnesium-sodium nitrate
system was previously studied by W.P.C et al [18]. The authors reported the kinetic
parameters calculated from the mass loss data obtained by TG and predicted the time
after which the reaction is expected to reach some amount of conversion at a certain
temperature on the basis of the experimental results. The authors have carried out the
thermo gravimetric analysis of the pyrotechnic composition and evaluated the kinetic
parameters from the weight loss data.
The work pertaining to the aging of these military pyrotechnic compositions viz. SR524
and SR 562 has not be reported earlier to the best of our knowledge of the published
literature. The work presented in this chapter is focused on the investigation of thermal,
kinetic and morphological changes that take place as a result of aging on the basis of
comparison of the results obtained for aged and fresh compositions. The kinetic
parameters in our case have been calculated by using the heat flow data obtained from the
DTA experiments. The accelerated aging of the pyrotechnic composition was carried out
for 30 days at a temperature of 70oC and relative humidity of 70 percent. The thermal
behaviour was investigated using TG/DTA and the kinetic parameters were calculated
using Kissinger method.
Thermal analysis is a very suitable technique for the analysis of energetic materials
especially due to the safety reasons. A very small amount of sample typically in the range
a few milligrams are required for the analysis. The thermal decomposition and kinetic
parameters of energetic materials including explosives, pyrotechnics and propellants are
often investigated by using different thermal analysis technique [19-24]. Different
methods of thermal analysis have proved to be a good tool to follow the aging process of
the energetic materials including pyrotechnics. Thermal data can be further utilized for
determination of the kinetic parameters and evaluate the safety of the pyrotechnic
materials before and after the aging process.
The reaction product of the aging is identified by comparing the XRD spectra of the fresh
and aged compositions. The scanning electron microscope is used to observe the surface
130
features and morphology to identify the changes in the physical condition of the
pyrotechnic mixture in the bulk form.
6.2 Thermal decomposition kinetics and effect of accelerated aging on
SR-524 pyrotechnic composition
SR-524 military pyrotechnic composition contains 58 percent magnesium as a fuel, 38
percent sodium nitrate as an oxidizer and 4 percent boiled linseed oil. The accelerated
aging of pyrotechnic composition was carried out in a humidity controlled oven for 30
days at 70oC and 70 percent relative humidity. Unlike propellants, there are no specific
aging criteria for the pyrotechnics. The military compositions are conventionally tested
up to 70oC to cater for the effect of maximum possible ambient temperatures. Moreover,
various aging studies on pyrotechnics and propellants have been previously carried out in
a highly humid atmosphere (generally more than 60 percent relative humidity) to get
meaningful data after the aging process.
6.3 Experimental Conditions
Defence grade pyrotechnic composition SR-524 was purchased from Pakistan Ordnance
Factories and used for experiments without any modification. The physical and chemical
changes before and after aging were monitored using scanning electron microscope
(SEM) and X-ray diffraction technique. The XRD instrument with Cu kα radiations by
STOE, Germany has been used for carrying out the structural analysis and
characterization of the reaction products of aging. The scan range during the analysis was
from 20o to 80
o. Physical changes resulting from the aging process were monitored by
using scanning electron microscope JSM- 6490 LA, JEOL, Japan. Thermal analysis of
aged and fresh pyrotechnic composition was carried out using the Diamond TG/DTA
instrument by Perkin Elmer. The alumina crucibles were used to hold the samples for
analysis. The pyrotechnic samples were heated from room temperature to 850oC to
monitor the thermal events and decomposition process. All the experiments were
conducted in inert nitrogen atmosphere and the flow rate of the gas was maintained at 50
ml min-1
. Experiments were performed with four different heating rates to calculate the
131
kinetic parameters of the fresh and aged samples. The heating rates of 10oC min
-1, 20
oC
min-1
, 30oC min
-1 and 40
oC min
-1 were used. To cater for the effect of higher heating
rates and keeping in view the safety considerations, the sample in all experiments was
kept close to 1mg. Arrhenius kinetic parameters were estimated by using Kissinger
method from the heat flow data. The method requires the heat flow data at multiple
heating rates for kinetic calculations. The details of the kinetic method have been
described in Chapter 2 in detail.
6.4 Results and discussion
6.4.1 Thermal analysis of the fresh and aged composition
The heat flow curve of fresh and aged SR-524 pyrotechnic composition has been
presented in Figure 6.1.
Figure 6.1 The heat flow curves of fresh and aged SR-524
pyrotechnic compositions
132
The curve for the fresh composition shows a small endothermic peak near 315oC which is
due to the melting of the sodium nitrate present in the pyrotechnic mixture. The second
curve which is highly exothermic in nature appears at a temperature of 538oC. This peak
represents the ignition of magnesium fuel due to reaction with oxygen released as a result
of oxidizer decomposition. The endothermic peak at 315oC is not clearly visible because
of the small heat flow value and it has been masked due to very high heat flow value of
the ignition peak. The curve for aged composition also shows one endothermic and one
exothermic peak similar to the fresh composition. The small endothermic peak has not
been affected much; however, the exothermic peak representing the ignition of fuel has
been shifted to a lower temperature due to the aging process. The exothermic peak for
aged composition appears at 524oC which is slightly lower than the fresh composition.
The effect of heating rate on the heat flow curve of the fresh pyrotechnic composition is
shown in Figure 6.2(a).
Figure 6.2 (a) Effect of multiple heating rates on the heat flow curve of
Fresh SR 524 pyrotechnic composition
133
It is seen that the small endothermic peak corresponding to the melting of sodium nitrate
does not shift with increasing heating rates. This peak has been masked because the
ignition peak has a very large heat flow value as compared to the endothermic peak. The
exothermic peak related to the ignition of the magnesium fuel shifts to higher
temperatures when the heating rates are increased. The similar effect of shift in peak
temperatures due to increasing heating rates has been reported by many other researchers
for different type of energetic materials including pyrotechnic compositions. The peak
temperatures for the fresh composition were 527.2oC, 538.7
oC, 547
oC and 555.9
oC
corresponding to the heating rates of 10oC min
-1, 20
oC min
-1, 30
oC min
-1 and 40
oC min
-1
respectively (Table 6.1).
*The peak temperatures corresponding to different heating rates have been reported at the
value of maximum heat flux
The effect of heating rate on the heat flow curve of aged pyrotechnic composition is
shown in Figure 6.2(b). The curve shows that the peak tempearture inreases from 498oC
Table 6.1 Kinetic parameters of SR-524 pyrotechnic composition calculated by
Kissinger method.
Heating Rate
(oC min
-1)
Peak Temperature*
(oC)
Ea
(kJ mol-1
)
A
(sec-1
)
K
(sec-1
)
∆H#
(kJ mol-1
)
10 527.2 3.85 x 1014
8.00 x 10-3
20 538.7 256+9% 4.34 x 1014
15.57 x 10-3
249
30 547.0 4.35 x 1014
22.85 x 10-3
40 555.9 3.79 x 1014
29.82 x 10-3
134
Figure 6.2(b) Effect of multiple heating rates on the heat flow curve of
Aged SR 524 pyrotechnic composition
*The peak temperatures corresponding to different heating rates have been reported at the
value of maximum heat flux
Table 6.2 Kinetic parameters of aged SR 524 pyrotechnic composition caculated by
Kissinger method.
Heating Rate
(oC min
-1)
Peak Temperature*
(oC)
Ea
(kJ mol-1
)
A
(sec-1
)
k
(sec-1
)
∆H#
(kJ mol-1
)
10 497.9 1.06 x 105 3.71 x 10
-3
20 524.5 110 +6% 1.12 x 105 6.93 x 10
-3 103
30 541.4 1.14 x 105 9.98 x 10
-3
40 558.6 1.04 x 105 12.76 10
-3
135
to 558oC when heating rate increses from 10
oC min
-1to 40
oC min
-1(Table 6.2). It is also
seen from Figure 2(b) that the shape of the decomposition peak of the aged compositions
at different heating rates is not very regular and smooth as compared to the fresh
composition. This is considered to be due to the physical changes caused in the
pyrotechnic compositions during the aging process and will be discussed on the basis of
SEM and XRD results.
The mass loss curve of fresh and aged composition has been presented in Figure 6.3. The
mass loss curve of fresh composition remains stable till 300oC. There is a gradual mass
loss above 300oC till 500
oC due to slow decomposition of the boiled linseed oil present in
the pyrotechnic composition. There is a rapid increase in the mass of the sample above
500oC due to oxidation of the magnesium fuel by the oxygen released due to the thermal
decomposition of the oxidizer.
Figure 6.3 The mass loss curve of fresh and aged SR 524
pyrotechnic compositions
The curve stabilizes again near 600oC. The mass loss curve of the aged composition
shows a slight mass loss till 300oC due to removal of physically adsorbed water.
136
Moreover, it shows mass loss of nearly 6 percent between temperature range of 300oC
and 350oC due to removal of chemically bonded water due to thermal decomposition of
magnesium hydroxide. This change in the mass loss curve shows that aging of the
pyrotechnic composition in a highly humid atmosphere has resulted in the production of
magnesium hydroxide. The presence of magnesium hydroxide has also been detected in
the XRD spectra of the aged composition. Rest of the events in the mass loss curve are
similar to the ones discussed for the fresh composition.
6.4.2 Kinetic Analysis of fresh and aged compositions
The kinetic analysis of the fresh and aged pyrotechnic composition SR-524 has been
carried out by using the Kissinger method. The graphs for determination of the kinetic
parameters of fresh and aged compositions are shown in Figure 6.4(a) and Figure 6.4(b)
respectively.
Figure 6.4(a) The Kissinger graph for determination of kinetic parameters of
fresh SR 524 pyrotechnic composition
137
They are based on the heat flow data obtained at multiple heating rates. The experiments
were performed as per the recommendations of the international committee of thermal
analysis and calorimetry (ICTAC) [25].
The results of the kinetic analysis are presented in Table 6.1 and 6.2 for fresh and aged
compositions respectively. The activation energy of the fresh composition was found to
be 256 kJ mol-1
and the corresponding value of enthalpy of activation was 249 kJ mol-1
.
The frequency factors showed slight variation with respect to peak temperatures and its
average value was found to be 4.08 x1014
sec-1
. The rate constant for the fresh
composition was nearly 8x10-3
sec-1
corresponding to heating rate of 10oC min
-1.
Figure 6.4(b) The Kissinger graph for determination of kinetic parameters of
aged SR 524 pyrotechnic composition
The kinetic analysis of aged composition shows that there is a substantial variation in the
kinetic parameters after the aging of pyrotechnic composition at high temperatures and
138
high humidity levels. The activation energy has decreased prominently by 146 kJ mol-1
from 256 kJ mol-1
for the fresh composition to 110kJ mol-1
for aged composition (Table 2).
The enthalpy of activation also decreased in the aged composition and its value came out
to be 103 kJ mol-1
. There is a huge decrease in the value of frequency factor due to large
decrease in the activation energy. The average value of the frequency factor for the aged
composition is 1.09 x 105. The rate constant also decreased for the aged composition and
its value was found to be 3.71 x 10-3
at a heating rate of 10oC min
-1.
The kinetic analysis shows that there is a decrease in the rate constant or in other words
there is a decline in the reactivity of the aged pyrotechnic composition despite the fact
that the activation energy has decreased tremendously. Ideally speaking, the decrease in
the activation energy should increase the rate of reaction. This however is not that simple
because the Arrhenius kinetic parameters are interlinked with each other and the rate
constant is determined by a complex interplay between the values of the temperature,
activation energy and the frequency factor. For instance, the increase in the temperature
increases the rate constant due to increase the value of the negative exponential term in
the rate equation i.e. (
). On the other hand, the increase in temperature lowers the
frequency factors due to the decrease in the value of positive exponential term i.e.
(
) and also decrease in the value of
. Thus increase in temperature lowers
the rate constant by lowering the frequency factor. We have just discussed the effect of
temperature here, although, rate constant shows a similar kind of dependence on
activation energy and frequency factor as well. Therefore, the experimental results may
vary from case to case basis and the experimental results in our case agree fairly with the
theoretical interpretation.
6.4.3 SEM Analysis of the fresh and the aged compositions
The surface feature of the fresh pyrotechnic composition SR-524 has been presented in
Figure 6.5 (a). It is seen that the surface of the fresh composition is very smooth and solid
without any pores and cracks. The magnesium particles can also be seen in the
micrograph. The micrographs were captured for the fresh and aged pyrotechnic
139
compositions in the bulk form to monitor the changes caused due to aging at high
temperatures and high humidity levels.
Figure 6.5 (a) SEM micrographs of the fresh SR-524 composition showing
smooth and solid surfaces
The SEM micrographs for the aged composition are presented in Figure 6.5 (b) for
comparison with the fresh composition. The most prominent change visible in the
micrographs is the presence of micro sized cracks. The development of the cracks is
certainly due to the aging of the pyrotechnic composition. During the thermal analysis of
the aged composition it was observed that the heat flow peaks are not very smooth and
regular. The development of the cracks seems to be the reason for the peak irregularity in
the aged composition. Moreover, the development of cracks is one of the main reasons
for such a huge decrease in the activation energy of the aged composition. The cracked
and porous compositions are generally easy to ignite as compared to the solid ones. The
aged composition therefore is easy to ignite due to the presence of cracks as compared to
the fresh composition due to relatively very low value of activation energy. The
140
Figure 6.5(b) SEM micrographs of aged SR-524 composition showing micro cracks
development of cracks however is a safety concern and the compositions can be
dangerous during storage as well as during the operational use.
6.4.4 XRD Analysis
The XRD pattern of the fresh pyrotechnic composition is presented in Figure 6.6 (a).
Nearly fifteen main diffraction peaks can be seen from the spectra. The peak data
matches precisely with the reference pattern number 00-004-0770 for magnesium powder
and reference pattern number 01-079-2056 for Sodium nitrate. Six peaks out of the
fifteen are characteristic peaks of sodium nitrate whereas eight peaks represent
magnesium. One of the peaks appearing at angular position of 47.819o could be assigned
to both magnesium and sodium nitrate. The peaks have been labeled accordingly in the
Figure. The crystal structure of the magnesium is hexagonal in this case and the crystal
structure of the sodium nitrate is rhombohedral.
XRD pattern of the aged pyrotechnic composition is presented in Figure 6.6 (b) The
figure shows some additional diffraction peaks representing magnesium hydroxide which
141
means that some of the magnesium present in the pyrotechnic composition has reacted
with the water vapors to form magnesium hydroxide as the reaction product of aging. The
Figure 6.6 XRD spectra of fresh and aged SR 524 pyrotechnic composition
TG curve also showed the presence of the magnesium hydroxide. These peaks were
absent in the XRD pattern of the fresh pyrotechnic composition. This clearly indicates
that high humidity levels strongly effect the chemical composition of the pyrotechnics.
Rest of the diffraction peaks are very much similar to the ones for the fresh composition.
The diffraction peak data of the aged composition matches with the reference pattern
number 00-004-0770, 01-079-2056 and 00-044-1482 for magnesium, sodium nitrate and
magnesium hydroxide respectively. The crystal structure and the cell parameters of the
magnesium and sodium nitrate did not change due to the aging. The crystal structure of
the magnesium hydroxide produced as the reaction product of the aging is hexagonal.
The mass loss curve also showed the presence of magnesium hydroxide in the aged
142
version. There was some additional mass loss in the temperature range of 300oC-350
oC
for the aged composition which could be due to the thermal decomposition of the
magnesium hydroxide formed due to the aging process.
6.4.5 Comparison of fresh and aged compositions
The comparison of the experimental results obtained for the fresh and the aged
compositions is obligatory to establish the overall effect of aging on the SR-524
pyrotechnic composition. The comparison of the DTA curve shows that the aged
composition ignites at lower temperature as compared to the fresh composition. The TG
results also confirm the lowering of the ignition temperature after aging. The aged
composition showed the ignition peak close to a temperature 524oC which is 14
oC lower
than the corresponding peak of the fresh composition. The DTA results indicate that the
ignition peaks shift to higher temperatures with increasing heating rates and the trend is
similar for both the fresh and aged compositions. The comparison of the kinetic
parameters showed prominent changes in the aged composition. The kinetic analysis
revealed that the activation energy of the aged composition decreased greatly by nearly
57 percent. The frequency factor also decreased noticeably after the aging. The aged
composition was found to be less reactive as compared to the fresh composition. There
was a noticeable decrease of nearly 53 percent in the rate of reaction constant of the aged
composition. The decrease in the activation energy meant that the composition after
aging became easier to ignite, however, the reaction proceeded at a lower rate due to
decrease in the overall rate constant.
The comparison of the SEM graphs of the fresh and aged pyrotechnic compositions
reveals that the surface of the aged composition showed some micro cracks as opposed to
a very solid and smooth surface of the fresh composition. The micro cracks could be one
of the reasons for such a large decrease in value of the activation energy. The comparison
of the XRD pattern of the fresh and aged composition showed some additional peaks for
the aged composition that were identified as the characteristic peaks of the magnesium
hydroxide. Some of the magnesium reacted with the water vapours at high temperatures
143
to form magnesium hydroxide as the reaction product of aging. The comparison of results
obtained by thermal analysis, kinetics, XRD and SEM clearly indicates that the exposure
of pyrotechnic compositions to high humidity and high temperatures for longer duration
has significantly altered the overall behaviour of the composition.
6.4.6 Evaluation of the pyrotechnic thermal stability
The critical ignition temperature is considered to be an important parameter pertaining to
the thermal stability and safety of energetic materials such as explosives, propellants and
pyrotechnics. It is the minimum temperature beyond which there is a chance of thermal
runaway reaction for the energetic materials [26,27]. It can be effectively used as a
thermal safety standard for the propellants, explosives and pyrotechnics. The energetic
composition is assumed to be safe for handling and storage if the critical ignition
temperature is adequately higher than the ambient temperature at which the composition
is to be stored. The critical ignition temperature can be easily estimated by using the
thermal and kinetic parameters and employing the under-mentioned formulae [28]. This
approach is common in the scientific community working on pyrotechnics for more than
a decade.
√
(6.1)
(6.2)
Where is the critical ignition temperature , E is the activation energy, R is the gas
constant, is the onset temperature corresponding to → 0 approximated using
regression coefficients b and c.
144
For the fresh and aged pyrotechnic composition, the values obtained by using equation
(6.2) are 518.6oC and 480.8
oC respectively. The above mentioned values of have been
used to calculate the critical ignition temperatures by using equation (6.1). The critical
ignition temperature of the aged composition was found to be 499.6oC which is lower
than the value of 527.6oC for the fresh composition. It would not be out of place to clarify
here that although the critical ignition temperature has decreased by 28oC due to aging,
however, the composition is still thermally safe due to the fact that the critical ignition
temperature of the aged composition is exceptionally higher than the ambient range of
temperatures. The SEM results, however, suggest that the development of micro cracks is
critical for its safety and the composition may be unpredictable during its storage,
ignition and functioning.
6.5 Conclusions
The experimental results confirmed that high temperatures and high humidity levels had a
pronounced effect on the thermal and kinetic behaviour of the pyrotechnic composition
based on the magnesium and sodium nitrate. Thermal analysis showed that the
decomposition peak temperature of the aged composition lowered by 14oC. The kinetic
parameters of the pyrotechnic mixture changed considerably after the aging. The
activation energy of aged composition decreased nearly by 57 percent and the frequency
factor also decreased noticeably. The aging process made the composition easy to ignite
by lowering the activation energy, however, the overall reactivity of the composition
reduced due to decrease in the rate constant. The rate constant decreased due to a large
decrease in the value of the frequency factor. XRD results suggest that the high humidity
levels resulted in the production of magnesium hydroxide as the reaction product of the
aging process. The combined effect of high temperature and high humidity resulted in the
development of micro sized cracks in the bulk composition and made it relatively unsafe
for storage and ignition as compared to the fresh composition. It is therefore concluded
that high humidity and elevated temperatures have a strong influence on the thermal
behaviour and kinetic parameters of pyrotechnic composition investigated in this work.
145
6.6 Accelerated aging of SR-562 pyrotechnic composition and
investigation of its thermo kinetic parameters
SR-562 pyrotechnic composition contains 50 percent magnesium powder, 35 percent
sodium nitrate, 11 percent calcium oxalate and 4 percent lithographic varnish. The
composition is used as a flare for high heat and light output applications. The accelerated
aging of SR-562 pyrotechnic composition has been carried out in a humidity controlled
oven at 70oC and 70 percent relative humidity for 30 days. As discussed earlier, unlike
propellants, there are no specific aging criteria for the pyrotechnics. The military
compositions are conventionally tested up to 70oC to cater for the effect of maximum
possible ambient temperatures. Moreover, various aging studies on pyrotechnics and
propellants have been previously carried out in a highly humid atmosphere (generally
more than 60 percent relative humidity) to get meaningful data after the aging process.
The composition after the aging was investigated in the present work for its thermal
behaviour, kinetics and morphology. For the sake of comparison, the fresh composition
was also investigated to quantify the changes in the aged composition.
6.7 Experimental Conditions
Defence grade pyrotechnic composition SR-562 was procured from Pakistan ordnance
factories. The composition was aged at a temperature of 70oC and 70 percent RH for a
period of 30 days. Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction were used to
observe changes induced by the aging process. The reaction products after the aging have
been identified by using XRD instrument by STOE; Germany. Scanning electron
microscope JSM- 6490 LA by JEOL, Japan has been used. Diamond TG/DTA instrument
of Perkin Elmer has been used to carry out the thermal analysis. The experiments were
carried out in the temperature range of 30oC to 850
oC to elucidate the mechanism of
thermal decomposition. Nitrogen gas with a flow rate of 50 ml min-1
has been used to
provide inert atmosphere during the conduct of experiments. Kinetic parameters of the
fresh and aged compositions were calculated by Kissinger method from the heat flow
146
data. For the kinetic evaluation, the experiments were carried out at multiple heating rates
of 10oC min
-1, 20
oC min
-1, 30
oC min
-1 and 40
oC min
-1. A very small amount of sample
nearly 1 mg has been used in all the experiments to cater for the safety aspects. Alumina
pans were used to hold the sample in all the experiments.
6.8 Results and discussion
6.8.1 Thermal Analysis of the fresh and aged compositions
Thermal analysis of the fresh SR-562 pyrotechnic composition has been carried out from
room temperature to 850oC to identify and analyze different thermal events including the
ignition of the pyrotechnic mixture. The DTA curves of the fresh and the aged SR-562
pyrotechnic compositions at a heating rate of 20oC min
-1have been shown in Figure 6.7.
The DTA curve of the fresh composition exhibits two distinct peaks; one of which is
endothermic and the other is exothermic in nature.
Figure 6.7 Comparison of the DTA curve of fresh and aged
SR-562 pyrotechnic composition
147
The first peak is very small and endothermic in nature that appears at a temperature of
311oC. This peak represents the melting of sodium nitrate which is present in this
composition. This peak is not clearly visible as it has been masked due to relatively a
very large heat flow output of the next peak. The second peak in the Figure is very
prominent and highly exothermic in nature. This peak appears at a temperature of
595.4oC and signifies ignition of the pyrotechnic mixture. The ignition of the magnesium
fuel takes place due to availability of sufficient oxygen produced as a result of the
thermal decomposition of the two oxidizers. The DTA curve of the aged pyrotechnic
composition is also shown in Figure 6.7 for comparison with the fresh composition. The
aged composition also exhibits two distinct peaks like the fresh composition. The first
peak endothermic peak did not change but the location of the second peak has been
changed on the temperature axis. For the aged composition, the exothermic peak related
to ignition of the pyrotechnic mixture appears at a temperature of 646.8oC. This
temperature is nearly 51oC higher than the ignition temperature of the fresh composition.
Figure 6.8 represents the effect of multiple heating rates on the DTA curve of the fresh
SR-562 pyrotechnic composition.
Figure 6.8 Effect of heating rate on the DTA curve of fresh SR-562 pyrotechnic composition
148
The Figure shows that the position of the first endothermic peak has not changed much
with the increasing heating rates. The peak is very small and has been masked due to very
large heat flow output of the ignition peak. The ignition peak has been shifted to higher
temperatures at higher heating rates. The ignition peaks appear at temperatures of
580.5oC, 595.4
oC, 605.7
oC and 615.2
oC respectively for heating rates of 10
oC min-1,
20oC min-1, 30
oC min-1 and 40
oC min-1 respectively and the data is presented in Table
6.3. Many researchers working in the field of energetic materials have reported the
similar trend of increase in the peak temperatures due the increase in the heating rates.
Figure 6.9 shows the effect of multiple of heating rates on the DTA curve of the aged SR-
562 pyrotechnic composition. The effect of heating rate is very much similar to the one
seen for the fresh composition. Ignition peaks of the aged composition also shifted to the
Figure 6.9 Effect of heating rate on the DTA curve of aged SR-562
pyrotechnic composition
149
higher temperatures with the increase in the heating rates. The peak temperatures for the
aged composition are 626.1oC, 646.8
oC, 662.9
oC and 674.7
oC respectively for the heating
rates of heating rates of 10oC min
-1, 20
oC min
-1, 30
oC min
-1 and 40
oC min
-1. The ignition
peak data of the aged sample at different heating rates has been shown in Table 6.4. It
can be seen from the data presented in Table 6.3 and 6.4 that for all the heating rates,
ignition temperature of the aged composition is higher than the corresponding ignition
temperature of the fresh composition.
*The peak temperatures corresponding to different heating rates have been
reported at the value of maximum heat flux
Table.6.3 Kinetic parameters of fresh SR-562 composition calculated from the
heat flow data.
Heating Rate
(oC min
-1)
Peak Temp.*
(oC)
Ea
(kJ mol-1
)
A
(sec-1
)
K
(sec-1
)
∆H#
(kJ mol-1
)
10 580.5 3.00 x 1012
6.59 x 10-3
20 595.4 239.5+6% 3.25 x 1012
12.73 x 10-3
232.3
30 605.7 3.23 x 1012
18.65 x 10-3
40 615.2 2.97 x 1012
24.34 x 10-3
Table.6.4 Kinetic parameters of aged SR-562 composition calculated from the
heat flow data.
Heating Rate
(oC min
-1)
Peak Temp.*
(oC)
Ea
(kJ mol-1
)
A
(sec-1
)
K
(sec-1
)
∆H#
(kJ mol-1
)
10 626.1 3.06 x 108 4.61 x 10
-3
20 646.8 186.2+5% 3.33 x 108 8.82 x 10
-3 178.8
30 662.9 3.17 x 108 12.78 x 10
-3
40 674.7 3.07 x 108 16.62 x10
-3
150
6.8.2 Kinetic Analysis of the fresh and aged composition
Kissinger method has been used to calculate the kinetic parameters in this work. The
relevant graphs for the fresh and aged pyrotechnic mixtures have been given in Figure
6.10(a) and Figure 6.10(b) respectively. The heat flow data from the DTA experiments at
four different heating rates has been used to construct the Kissinger kinetic plot. Multiple
heating rate experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines provided by
the international committee of thermal analysis and calorimetry (ICTAC) [25]. The
kinetic parameters of both versions of the sample were calculated by following the
Standard ASTM method.
Figure 6.10 (a) Kissinger graph for calculation of Kinetic parameters of
fresh SR-562 pyrotechnic composition
Kinetic evaluation of both the fresh and the aged pyrotechnic compositions has been
carried out to compare and contrast the results. The kinetic parameters of both the
samples have been included in Table 6.3 and 6.4 respectively for the fresh and aged
compositions. Energy of activation for the fresh SR-562 pyrotechnic composition came
out to be 239.5 kJ mol-1
; whereas, the enthalpy of activation in this case was found to be
232.3 kJ mol-1
. The pre-exponential factor changed slightly in each case due to change in
151
the values of peak temperatures and heating rates. The average value of the pre-
exponential factor came out to be 3.11 x1012
sec-1
. The rate of reaction constant of the
fresh pyrotechnic mixture was found to be 6.59x10-3
sec-1
at a heating rate of 10oC min
-1.
The details are presented in Table 6.3.
Figure 6.10 (b) Kissinger graph for calculation of Kinetic parameters of
aged SR-562 pyrotechnic composition
It was revealed after the kinetic evaluation of the aged sample that the aging of
pyrotechnic composition at high temperatures and humidity changed both the thermal and
kinetic parameters significantly. The activation energy of the aged composition was
found to be 186.2 kJ mol-1
. This value is notably lower than the activation energy of the
fresh sample. The activation energy of the pyrotechnic mixture after aging has lowered
by 22 percent. The value of the enthalpy of activation of the aged sample was also found
to be lowered and in this case came out to be also decreased in the aged composition and
its value came out to be 178.8 kJ mol-1
. The decrease in the activation energy has greatly
decreased the value of the pre-exponential factor of the aged composition. For the aged
composition, the average value was found to be 3.15 x 108. Also, the reaction rate
constant in this case was found to be 4.61 x 10-3
for the heating rate of 10oC min
-1 which
is lower than the one for the fresh sample.
152
The comparison of the thermal and kinetic data show the ignition temperature has
increased for the aged composition due to which the rate constant should also have
increased but in this case the rate constant has rather decreased. It is clear from the
Arrhenius rate equation that the rate constant is dependent on three different factors i.e.
frequency factor, activation energy and the temperature. One of the reasons for the
decrease in the rate constant of the aged composition in this particular case is the
temperature dependence of the frequency factor „A‟ that has reduced significantly due to
increase in the value of the peak temperature and lowering of the activation energy. The
decrease in the frequency factor is responsible for the decrease in the reactivity of the
aged composition. Therefore, the experimental results in this work are consistent with the
theoretical justification.
It is interesting to note that the aged composition on one hand has become easy to ignite
as it requires less amount of activation energy for the start of reaction and on the other
hand it has become less reactive because the reaction proceeds slowly as compared to the
fresh composition.
6.8.3 SEM Analysis of fresh and aged compositions
SEM analysis of both the compositions was carried out to identify any physical changes
caused by the aging process. The surface of the fresh composition SR-562 was
examined by SEM and the relevant micrograph is presented in Figure 6.11(a). The Figure
shows that surface of the composition quite solid and even and there are no cracks at all.
The micrographs for both the fresh and aged compositions were recorded in the bulk
form at same level of magnification to see the differences clearly and for better
comparison of the results. Figure 6.11(b) presents the SEM micrograph of the aged SR-
562 pyrotechnic composition. it can be seen from the Figure that the surface features of
the aged composition are different as compared to the fresh composition. The micro sized
cracks are visible at the surface of the aged composition. These cracks have been
developed due to the aging of the composition at high temperatures and humidity levels.
In the kinetic analysis of the aged composition, the activation energy was found to be
lowered. The development of these micro cracks could be the reason for decrease in the
activation energy because the solid compositions are in general more difficult to ignite
153
whereas the cracked or porous compositions are relatively easy to ignite. It is however a
point of concern because the cracked energetic compositions are not considered to be safe
for handling, storage and operation and therefore considered to be less reliable.
Figure 6.11(a) SEM micrographs of fresh SR 562 pyrotechnic composition
showing solid and even surface
Figure 6.11(b) SEM micrographs of aged SR 562 pyrotechnic composition at
showing micro sized cracks
154
6.8.4 XRD Analysis of fresh and aged compositions
Figure 6.12 (a) shows the XRD pattern of fresh SR-562 pyrotechnic composition. There
are about twelve diffraction peaks which are visible in the spectra. Some of the peaks for
different components of the mixture have overlapped and therefore represent the presence
of more than one component. The peak data of the fresh composition agrees with
reference pattern 00-004-0770 that indicates the presence of magnesium powder,
reference pattern 01-085-1467 which indicates the presence of sodium nitrate and
reference pattern 00-035-0914 for calcium oxalate. Ten peaks in the spectra confirm the
presence of magnesium and four peaks indicate the presence of sodium nitrate, three
peaks in the spectra are characteristic of calcium oxalate. Each individual peak has been
labeled accordingly to show the presence of different components of the mixture.
Magnesium, sodium nitrate and the calcium oxalate particles present in this sample have
hexagonal, rhombohedral and orthorhombic crystal structures respectively.
Figure 6.12(a) XRD spectra of fresh SR-562 pyrotechnic composition showing the
presence of magnesium, sodium nitrate and calcium oxalate.
155
Figure 6.12(b) XRD spectra of aged SR-562 pyrotechnic composition showing the
presence of magnesium hydroxide as the reaction product of aging.
Figure 6.12(b) represents the XRD spectra of the aged SR-562pyrotechnic composition.
It is clearly seen from the Figure that few additional diffraction peaks appear in the
spectra. The analysis of these peaks reveals that they are representative peaks of
magnesium hydroxide. The presence of magnesium hydroxide in the spectra indicates
that due to high temperatures and elevated humidity levels some part of the magnesium
powder present in the aged mixture reacts with the water vapors and results in the
production of magnesium hydroxide. The magnesium hydroxide peaks were not at all
present in Figure 6.12(a) representing XRD spectra of the fresh composition and
remaining peaks are similar for both the compositions. These results confirm that
simultaneous presence of high humidity levels and high temperatures has seriously
affected the chemical composition of the aged composition SR-562. The XRD pattern in
this case is consistent with the reference patterns number 00-004-0770, 01-085-1467, 00-
035-0914 and 00-044-1482 for magnesium, sodium nitrate, calcium oxalate and
156
magnesium hydroxide respectively. The cell parameters and crystal structures of all the
components of the pyrotechnic mixture remained the same. The magnesium hydroxide
produced as a result of aging in this case has hexagonal crystal structure.
6.8.5 Comparison of fresh and aged compositions
The comparative analysis of the experimental results obtained for the fresh and the aged
compositions is briefly described here to establish the overall effect of aging on the SR-
562 pyrotechnic composition. The comparison of the DTA results showed that the aged
composition ignited at higher temperature as compared to the fresh composition. The
ignition peak of the aged composition appeared close to a temperature 646.8oC which is
51oC higher than the corresponding peak of the fresh composition. The DTA results
indicate that the ignition peaks shift to higher temperatures with increasing heating rates
and the trend is similar for both the fresh and aged compositions. The comparison of the
kinetic parameters showed prominent changes in the aged composition. The kinetic
analysis revealed that the activation energy of the aged composition decreased by nearly
22 percent. The frequency factor also decreased noticeably after the aging. The aged
composition was found to be less reactive as compared to the fresh composition. There
was a noticeable decrease of nearly 30 percent in the rate of reaction constant of the aged
composition. The decrease in the activation energy meant that the composition after
aging became easier to ignite, however, the reaction proceeded at a lower rate due to
decrease in the rate constant.
The comparison of the SEM graphs of the fresh and aged pyrotechnic compositions
revealed that the surface of the aged composition showed some micro cracks as opposed
to a very solid and smooth surface of the fresh composition. The micro cracks could be
one of the reasons for the decrease in value of the activation energy. The comparison of
the XRD pattern of the fresh and aged composition showed some additional peaks for the
aged composition that were identified as the characteristic peaks of the magnesium
hydroxide. Some of the magnesium reacted with the water vapours at high temperatures
to form magnesium hydroxide as the reaction product of aging. Similar reaction of
magnesium with the water vapours was observed for SR-524 composition as well.
157
The comparison of results obtained by thermal analysis, kinetics, XRD and SEM clearly
indicates that the exposure of pyrotechnic composition SR-562 to high humidity and high
temperatures for longer duration has significantly altered the overall behaviour of the
composition.
6.8.6 Estimation of thermal stability of the pyrotechnics
There is an important parameter known as the critical ignition temperature that can be
used to predict the thermal stability of the pyrotechnic, explosives and propellant. For the
energetic materials, it is defined as the minimum temperature which if exceeded may lead
to a thermal runaway reaction. This parameter can be used to predict the safety of the
pyrotechnic compositions during storage and handling. For the pyrotechnic compositions
to be safe for storage, the critical ignition temperature should be sufficiently higher than
the maximum possible ambient temperatures. Once thermal and kinetic parameters of a
composition are known, it is easy to estimate the critical ignition temperature by using
the equation (6.1) described above [29]. This method of estimating the critical ignition
temperature is now very common since last one decade and it is being effectively used by
researchers working in the field of energetic material including pyrotechnics.
The value for the fresh SR-562 pyrotechnic composition has been found to be
570.6oC from equation (6.2) and for the aged composition it has been found to be
612.1oC. The critical ignition temperatures for both the compositions have been
calculated from equation (6.1) by using the values mentioned above. The critical
ignition temperature for the fresh composition came out to be 582.4oC and it is lower than
the critical ignition temperature of the aged composition which is 629.8oC. Both these
temperatures are sufficiently higher than the maximum possible ambient temperatures
and therefore the fresh and the aged composition are thermally stable.
6.9 Conclusions
The results indicate that aging of the SR-562 pyrotechnic composition at extreme
conditions of temperature and humidity has changed the thermal behaviour, kinetic
parameters, chemical composition and the surface features to a large extent. The
comparison of thermal data for a heating rate of 20oC min
-1 showed that the ignition
158
temperature of the aged composition increased by nearly 51oC. The aging process also
changed the kinetic parameters of the SR-562 pyrotechnic composition due to the
changes in the thermal behaviour. The kinetic analysis showed nearly 22 percent decrease
in the value of activation energy of the aged composition as compared to the fresh
composition. The pre exponential factor was found to be lowered as well in the aged
sample. The rate constant was decreased by nearly 30 percent after the aging despite
decrease in the value of activation energy due to the fact that the pre exponential factor
decreased considerably. This means that the aged composition became easy to ignite due
to lowering of activation energy but its reactivity decreased due to lowering of the
reaction rate constant. XRD results of the aged composition depicted that magnesium
hydroxide has been formed due to reaction of some of the magnesium with water
vapours. SEM micrographs showed the presence of micro sized cracks on the surface of
the pyrotechnic composition and therefore the aged composition is likely to be unsafe
during storage and operational use.
References
[1] S. Danali, R. Palaiah, K. Raha, Defence Science Journal 60 (2010) 152.
[2] J.A. Conkling, C. Mocella, Chemistry of Pyrotechnics: Basic Principles and
Theory, CRC Press, 1985.
[3] M. Brown, Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry 65 (2001) 323.
[4] C. Zhu, H. Wang, L. Min, Journal of Energetic Materials 32 (2014) 219.
[5] A. Eslami, S. Hosseini, S. Pourmortazavi, Fuel 87 (2008) 3339.
[6] S.G. Hosseini, S.M. Pourmortazavi, S.S. Hajimirsadeghi, Combustion and flame
141 (2005) 322.
[7] L. Wang, X. Shi, W. Wang, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 1.
[8] S. Brown, E.L. Charsley, S. Goodall, P.G. Laye, J.J. Rooney, T.T. Griffiths,
Thermochimica acta 401 (2003) 53.
[9] H. Biteau, PhD thesis, The University of Edinburgh (2010).
[10] W. de Klerk, E. Krabbendam-LaHaye, B. Berger, H. Brechbuhl, C. Popescu,
Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry 80 (2005) 529.
[11] Y. Oyumi, E. Kimura, K. Nagayama, Propellants, explosives, pyrotechnics 22
(1997) 263.
159
[12] D. Sorensen, A. Quebral, E. Baroody, W. Sanborn, Journal of thermal analysis
and calorimetry 85 (2006) 151.
[13] M.D. Judge, Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 28 (2003) 114.
[14] Y. Li, W. Song, C. Xie, D. Zeng, A. Wang, M. Hu, Materials chemistry and
physics 97 (2006) 127.
[15] Ö. Hocaoğlu, F. Pekel, S. Özkar, Journal of applied polymer science 79 (2001)
959.
[16] S. Guo, Q. Wang, J. Sun, X. Liao, Z.-s. Wang, Journal of hazardous materials 168
(2009) 536.
[17] I. Tuukkanen, S. Brown, E.L. Charsley, S. Goodall, J. Rooney, T.T. Griffiths, H.
Lemmetyinen, Thermochimica acta 417 (2004) 223.
[18] W.P. de Klerk, W. Colpa, P. Van Ekeren, Journal of thermal analysis and
calorimetry 85 (2006) 203.
[19] I. Tuukkanen, S. Brown, E.L. Charsley, S. Goodall, P.G. Laye, J.J. Rooney, T.T.
Griffiths, H. Lemmetyinen, Thermochimica acta 426 (2005) 115.
[20] M. Yao, L. Chen, J. Yu, J. Peng, Procedia Engineering 45 (2012) 567.
[21] I. Tuukkanen, E.L. Charsley, S. Goodall, P.G. Laye, J.J. Rooney, T.T. Griffiths,
H. Lemmetyinen, Thermochimica acta 443 (2006) 116.
[22] S. Pourmortazavi, S. Hosseini, M. Rahimi-Nasrabadi, S. Hajimirsadeghi, H.
Momenian, Journal of hazardous materials 162 (2009) 1141.
[23] A.A. Vargeese, S. Mija, K. Muralidharan, Journal of Energetic Materials 32
(2014) 146.
[24] Y.-L. Zhu, H. Huang, H. Ren, Q.-J. Jiao, Journal of Energetic Materials 32 (2014)
16.
[25] S. Vyazovkin, A.K. Burnham, J.M. Criado, L.A. Pérez-Maqueda, C. Popescu, N.
Sbirrazzuoli, Thermochimica Acta 520 (2011) 1.
[26] T. Kotoyori, Journal of loss prevention in the process industries 2 (1989) 16.
[27] J.M. Pickard, Thermochimica acta 392 (2002) 37.
[28] F.-q. ZHAO, R.-z. HU, H. ZHANG, H.-x. GAO, H.-a. ZHAO, H.-x. MA,
Chemical Research in Chinese Universi-ties 26 (2010) 829.
[29] Z. Tonglai, H. Rongzu, X. Yi, L. Fuping, Thermochimica Acta 244 (1994) 171.
160
Chapter 7
Thermal decomposition kinetics of nano zinc
oxide and nano magnesium oxide catalyzed
composite solid propellant
7.1 Introduction
Propellant compositions based on ammonium perchlorate (AP) and hydroxyl-terminated
polybutadiene (HTPB) are frequently used in the field of composite solid propellants [1-
3]. Ammonium perchlorate is used as an oxidizer for the combustion of hydroxy-
terminated polybutadiene (HTPB) binder which also acts as a fuel. Although some new
oxidizers such as ammonium dinitramide (ADN) and hydrazinium nitroformate (HNF)
have been inducted as a replacement of ammonium perchlorate (AP), however, AP is still
preferred in variety of propellant and pyrotechnic formulations due to its high density,
good oxygen balance and excellent compatibility with other ingredients. The impact of
different additives especially transition metal oxides (TMOs) on thermal decomposition
and kinetic behaviour of AP and propellant formulations containing AP has always
attracted attention of the scientific community working in the field of energetic materials
[1,4,5]. This chapter presents the effect of a small percentage of zinc oxide and
magnesium oxide nano particles on the thermal decomposition and the kinetic behaviour
of HTPB/AP composite solid propellant. Variation in the thermal decomposition pattern
of AP/HTPB composite consequently influences the combustion process.
Transition metal oxides (TMOs) are often used to catalyze the thermal decomposition of
the AP/HTPB based composite solid propellant and to improve their performance by
enhancing the burn rates [6-8]. They are commonly referred as the burn rate modifiers.
161
Different factors such as concentration of TMOs, their particle size and the exposed
surface area influence the overall effect of these modifiers on the burn rate of propellant
[9]. The nano sized additions are now preferred over the conventional micro sized
additions [10]. The smaller size of catalyst particles increases the exposed surface area
and enhances the catalytic activity considerably.
A lot of research has been carried out to see the effect of micro/nano sized transition
metal oxides on the thermal decomposition and kinetics of AP and composite solid
propellants. Patil et al. investigated the effect of nano ferric oxide on the thermal
decomposition of the HTPB/AP based composite solid propellant and reported a higher
heat release of 40 percent in the catalyzed version [6]. The authors, however, reported a
significant increase in the activation energy of the catalyzed propellant contrary to a
general trend of decrease in activation energy. Similarly, Duan et al. have recently
investigated the effect of different percentages of nano MgO on the thermal
decomposition of AP and reported that it has a strong catalytic effect on the
decomposition of ammonium perchlorate [7]. The work presented in chapter 4 also
described the effect of addition of nano magnesium oxide catalyst on the thermal
decomposition kinetics of ammonium perchlorate. The results clearly indicated the
effectiveness of the catalyst and significant changes in thermal as well as the kinetic
behaviour were observed. Sun et al. have reported the effect of ZnO twin cones on the
thermal decomposition of ammonium perchlorate and observed that these cones have a
strong catalytic effect on AP and significantly lower its decomposition temperature [11].
The authors, however, have not computed the kinetic parameters in their work. Tang et
al. has very recently reported the catalytic effect of ZnO nano crystals on the thermal
decomposition of AP. They reported that both the decomposition temperature and the
activation energy were lowered by the addition of ZnO [12].
In the present work, we have reported the effect of nano sized zinc oxide and magnesium
oxide on the thermal decomposition and kinetic behaviour of composite solid propellant
containing HTPB/AP. The nano particles of zinc oxide and magnesium oxide were
characterized using SEM and XRD techniques before mixing with the propellant
composition. Moreover, comparative analysis of the thermal and kinetic data has been
162
carried out for catalyzed and un-catalyzed composite solid propellant. Thermal analysis
of the propellant composition was carried out using differential scanning calorimetry
(DSC) and Thermogravimetery (TG). The Arrhenius kinetic parameters were estimated
by using four different kinetic methods based on non-isothermal data obtained from DSC
and TG.
Thermal analysis is an effective analytical technique for the investigation of different
materials including energetic materials such as explosives, propellants and pyrotechnics
[13-15]. The technique is essentially very safe due to the requirement of an extremely
small amount of the sample for the analysis. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) is
often used to investigate the thermal decomposition and the kinetic parameters of highly
energetic materials including various types of propellants [16,17].
7.2 Experimental Conditions
Defence grade composite solid propellant has been used to accomplish the present work.
The composite solid propellant containing 80 percent AP, 15 percent HTPB and 5 percent
additives was synthesized by National Development Complex on our request as per the
above mentioned specifications using a slurry cast technique. One of the compositions
was prepared without the addition of nano catalysts and will be called as composition „A‟
in the entire chapter. The other composition was prepared by adding 2% zinc oxide nano
particles and will be called as composition „B‟. The third composition was prepared by
adding 2% nano magnesium oxide and will be called as composition “C” in this chapter.
The bimodal particle distribution containing AP particles of two different sizes was used.
The size of the smaller AP particles was in the range of 121-131µm and that of the larger
AP particles was between 334-362µm. The ratio of the two different sized particles was
50/50 by mass of the total AP present in the composite propellant. Zinc oxide nano
particles were synthesized via Sol-Gel method originally reported by Omivar et al.
(Omivar, 2012) while magnesium oxide was purchased off the shelf. The nano particles
of ZnO and MgO were characterized using scanning electron microscope (SEM) and X-
ray diffraction techniques. The XRD instrument by STOE, Germany with Cu kα
radiations was used for structural analysis. The angular scan range was kept between 20o
to 80o. Scanning electron microscope JSM- 6490 LA, JEOL, Japan has been used to
163
acquire the micrographs of ZnO and MgO nanoparticles. Thermal analysis of the
catalyzed and un-catalyzed versions of composite solid propellant was carried out by
using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The DSC823e instrument by Mettler
Toledo has been used in this work for thermal analysis. The crucibles made up of
aluminum were used to carry out the analysis of both the samples. The propellant
samples were heated from room temperature to 550oC to analyze the complete
decomposition process. Inert atmosphere was maintained during the conduct of
experiments by using nitrogen gas at a flow rate of 50 ml min-1
. The experiments were
conducted at a set four different heating rates for composition A, B and C to calculate the
kinetic parameters. The heating rates were 10oC min
-1, 20
oC min
-1, 30
oC min
-1 and 40
oC
min-1
. For safety considerations, and to mitigate the effect of higher heating rates the
mass of the sample was kept very small i.e. between 1.5 to 2 mg in all experiments. Heat
flow data obtained from the DSC experiments was then used for determination of the
Arrhenius kinetic parameters for both the propellant compositions using Kissinger
method. The Diamond TG instrument by Perkin Elmer has been used for thermo
gravimetric analysis of composition A, B and C.
7.3 Kinetics of thermal decomposition
Kinetic parameters give important information regarding the decomposition process.
Kinetic parameters of the two versions of the propellant were determined using four
different kinetic methods including Kissinger method, Flynn–Wall–Ozawa method,
Friedman method and Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose method. Brief description of the kinetic
methods is presented below.
7.3.1 Kissinger Method
The details of the Kissinger method are given in Chapter 2 and the final equation is
described below [18]:
(
)
(7.1)
164
In the above equation, is the temperature of decomposition peak, is the heating rate,
A is frequency factor, R is the gas constant, T is the sample temperature, n is the order
of reaction and E is the energy of activation in kJmol-1
. The frequency factor is calculated
by the following equation:
[ (
)]
(7.2)
The rate of reaction constant k can be determined when both E and A are known by the
famous Arrhenius equation.
k = A (
) (7.3)
The kinetic parameters of composition A, B and C calculated by this method are
presented in Table 7.1 and 7.3 and 7.5 respectively.
7.3.2 Friedman Method
Friedman method is one of the most widely used isoconversional method. The final
equation of the Friedman method is given below [19]:
(
) [ ]
(7.4)
Where β is the heating rate (oCmin
-1), α is the degree of conversion, A is the pre
exponential factor, is the activation energy in kJmol-1
, T is the sample temperature and
R is the universal constant.
7.3.3 Flynn–Wall–Ozawa Method
The final equation of the FWO method is given below [20]:
(
) (
) (7.5)
In equation (7.5), is the temperature corresponding to a certain degree of conversion
α, represents the heating rate, A is frequency factor, R is the universal constant and
165
is the energy of activation in kJmol-1
corresponding to a certain degree of conversion α.
7.3.4 Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose Method
The final equation of the KAS method is given below [21]:
(
) (
)
(7.6)
In the equation (7.6), is the temperature corresponding to a certain degree of
conversion α, represents the heating rate, A is frequency factor, R is the universal
constant and is the energy of activation in kJmol-1
corresponding to a certain degree
of conversion α .
7.4 Results and Discussion
7.4.1 Characterization of nano particles of ZnO
The morphology and particle size of the catalyst has a strong effect on the catalytic
mechanism; therefore, a brief description of these features is presented here. Figure 7.1
Figure 7.1 XRD pattern of nano sized zinc oxide used as
actalyst (Miller indices marked)
166
presents the XRD pattern of the ZnO nano particles. Nine diffraction peaks are present in
the XRD pattern and are located at 2 theta position of 31.78o, 34.41
o, 36.24
o, 47.52
o,
56.58o, 62.81
o, 66.38
o, 67.89 and 69.01
o. The peak data agrees with reference pattern No
01-076-0704 showing that these are characteristic peaks of zinc oxide. Corresponding
Miller indices have been marked on the diffraction peaks. The XRD spectra shows the
crystalline nature of the nano particles and crystal structure of the zinc oxide in this case
is hexagonal with cell parameters as a = 0.3253 nm, b = 0.3253 nm and c = 0.5213 nm.
Scherer formula has been used for calculation of the crystallite size of zinc oxide using
XRD data and the average crystallite size came out to be nearly 35 nm.
Figure 7.2 shows the SEM micrograph of ZnO nano particles. The results show that the
particles are well dispersed. The particle morphology is seen to be cylindrical and rod
type in this case. The measurements from SEM image show that the average diameter of
the zinc oxide nano particles is nearly between 80-90nm. The particles are therefore
Figure 7.2 SEM micrograph of zinc oxide nano particles
used as a catalyst
167
expected to cause good catalytic activity in the thermal behaviour of composite solid
propellant due to small size and large exposed surface area.
7.4.2 Characterization of nano particles of MgO
Particle size and the morphology of catalyst play an important role in its catalytic
behaviour and therefore, a summary of these characteristics has been presented for nano
particles of magnesium oxide. Figure 7.3 shows the SEM micrograph of the MgO nano
particles. The particles are seen to be well dispersed and exhibit regularity in their
morphology. The particles are not perfectly spherical rather they seem to be elliptical in
shape. The measurements from the SEM micrograph show that average diameter of the
magnesium oxide particles is between 20 to 30 nm (measured for the elongated side). On
the other hand, the average diameter was found to be nearly 15 to 20 nm for the shorter
side. The size of MgO particles is therefore well within the range of nano meters and
considered to be very suitable for its use as a catalyst.
Figure 7.3 SEM micrograph of magnesium oxide nano particles
MgO nano particles were also characterized by using X-ray diffraction. The XRD spectra
of the MgO nano particles have been presented in Figure 7.4.
168
Figure 7.4 XRD spectra of the MgO nano particles
There are five main diffraction peaks in the spectra which are located at a peak position
of 37.9o, 42.6
o, 62.2
o, 73.3
o, 78.4
o. The diffraction data agrees well with the reference
pattern No 01-074-1225 and the above mentioned peaks represent magnesium oxide
(MgO). The Miller Indices corresponding to all the have been marked in the Figure. The
diffraction peaks are not very sharp showing that the particles are not very crystalline and
have a small particle size. Scherer formula has been used to calculate the crystallite size
of the nano particles and the average crystallite size has been found to be nearly 9nm.
7.4.3 Analysis of Propellant composition A
(a) Thermal analysis
The representative DSC curves for composite solid propellant composition A are shown
in Figure 7.5 at four different heating rates i.e. 10oC min
-1, 20
oC min
-1, 30
oC min
-1 and
40oC min
-1.
169
Figure 7.5 Effect of heating rate on the DSC curve of composition A
representing un-catalyzed CSP
The DSC curves shows two distinct peaks one of which is endothermic and the other is
exothermic in nature. The endothermic peak appears near a temperature of 250oC and
represents an important event of solid state phase transformation of AP present in the
propellant. The crystal structure of AP changes from orthorhombic to cubic as a result of
this phase transformation. This peak did not shift much by the increasing heating rates.
The exothermic peak represents the decomposition of the composite solid propellant and
appears at different temperatures as a consequence of different heating rates. The peak
temperatures are nearly 398.8oC, 414.5
oC, 427.1
oC, 437.9
oC corresponding to heating
rates of 10oC min
-1, 20
oC min
-1, 30
oC min
-1 and 40
oC min
-1 respectively. The analysis of
composition A was necessary to quantify the effect of the catalyst under similar
experimental conditions and subsequent comparison of results obtained for composition
B.
In our earlier work on thermal cum kinetic comparison of various oxidizers, it was
observed that the AP decomposition exhibited two exothermic peaks corresponding to a
170
low temperature and a high temperature decomposition stage contrary to a single stage
complete decomposition of the composite solid propellant in this case[22]. This is
thought to be due to the strong binding of the AP particles in the polymeric matrix of
HTPB which also acts as a fuel and the complete decomposition of the AP takes place in
a single step.
The mass loss curves of propellant composition A was obtained at multiple heating rates
and the effect of heating rate on the mass loss pattern is shown in Figure 7.6 for
compositions A. The results show that the mass loss step shifts to higher temperatures
when the heating rates are increased. The extent of conversion (α) can be easily
determined from the mass loss data by using the following formula.
(7.7)
Figure 7.6 Mass loss pattern of propellant composition A at multiple heating rates
171
In the above equation, and represent the initial and the final mass of the sample
and represents the sample mass any given time t or at any given temperature T. The
isoconversional kinetic analysis of both the compositions has been carried out at six
different values of conversion degree (α). The overall kinetic analysis of composition A
and B has been carried out by four different methods.
(b) Kinetic analysis by using DSC data (composition A)
The heat flow data obtained from DSC experiments at multiple heating rates has been
used to calculate the kinetic parameters of the composite propellant by the Kissinger
method. The representative graph of the Kissinger method used for determination of the
kinetic parameters is shown in Figure 7.7. The Figure represents the plot of reciprocal
peak temperature against ln β/Tp2. The activation energy in this case was found to be
Figure 7.7 Graph representing the Kissinger method for determination of kinetic
parameters of composition A from DSC data.
172
127kJmol-1
from the heat flow data. This value is in accordance with the different values
reported in the literature. Rocco et al examined the thermal degradation of HTPB/AP
based propellant using DSC at five different heating rates [23]. They reported the
activation energy of the composite propellant as 126.2 kJmol-1
and134.5 kJmol-1
by
Kissinger and Ozawa method respectively. Both these values are in fair agreement with
the activation energy of 127.1 kJ determined in our case. The values of frequency factor,
rate constant and enthalpy of activation have been presented in Table 7.1 for propellant
composition A. The data show that the values of pre exponential factors vary with the
change in the peak temperature due to increase in the heating rate. These values,
however, are quite close to each other and the average value of the frequency factor is
4.6x107s
-1. The rate constant increases with increase in the peak temperature.
(c) Kinetic analysis by using TG data (composition A)
The TG data obtained at multiple heating rates has also been used to evaluate the kinetic
parameters of the composite propellant. The reaction mechanism of the thermal
decomposition of composite solid propellants varies with temperature and therefore the
Table 7.1 Kinetic parameters of composite solid propellant calculated from
DSC data by Kissinger Method (Composition A)
Heating Rate
(oC min
-1)
Peak Temp.
(oC)
Ea
(kJ mol-1
)
A
(sec-1
)
k
(sec-1
)
∆H#
(kJ mol-1
)
10 398.8 4.46 x 107 5.66 x 10
-3
20 414.5 127+7% 4.94 x 107 1.07 x 10
-2 121
30 427.1 4.79 x 107 1.56 x 10
-2
40 437.9 4.44 x 107 2.01 x 10
-2
173
activation energy also changes as a function of degree of conversion of the sample. It
would not be out of place to mention here that the decomposition of composite propellant
is a complex and multistep process. Therefore, three different isoconversional methods
based on the TG data have also been used to elucidate the reaction mechanism of the
composite solid propellant. The activation energy of composition A was estimated for α =
0.2, α = 0.3, α = 0.4, α = 0.5, α = 0.6 and α = 0.7. The activation energy was found to be
121.9kJmol-1
, 133kJmol-1
and 139.9kJmol-1
for KAS, Friedman and FWO method
Table 7.2 Activation energy data corresponding to different degrees of conversion for
propellant composition A (calculated from TG data)
respectively (α=0.4). The activation energy data corresponding to other conversion
degrees is presented in Table 7.2. The representative graphs for estimation of activation
energy of composition A by all the three isoconversional methods are given in Figure
7.8(a), 7.8(b) and 7.8(c) for (α=0.4).
It has been found during the kinetic analysis that the activation energy of composite solid
propellant shows some variation with respect to the extent of conversion (α) as the
reaction proceeds. The trend for such a variation has been shown in Figure 9 which
presents the “E” versus “α” curve for composition A by three different isoconversional
methods mentioned above.
Activation Energy (kJmol-1
)
Method
Friedman 126.5 126.9
133
127.8
124
125.9
FWO 133
133.5
139.9
134.5
130.5
132.4
KAS 115.8
116
121.9
116.6
112.7
114.5
174
Figure 7.8 (a) Graph representing the Flynn–Wall–Ozawa (FWO) method for
determination of kinetic parameters of composite solid propellant from
TG data
Figure 7.8(b) Graph representing the Friedman method for determination of kinetic
parameters of composite solid propellant from TG data
175
Figure 7.8 (c) Graph representing the Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose (KAS) method for
determination of kinetic parameters of composite solid propellant from
TG data
Figure 7.9 Plot showing the activation energies versus extent of conversion for
composition A by three different methods (calculated from TG data)
176
7.4.4 Analysis of Propellant composition B
(a) Thermal analysis
The DSC curves representing the thermal decomposition of the composition B are shown
Figure 7.10 at four different heating rates of 10oC min
-1, 20
oC min
-1, 30
oC min
-1 and 40
oC
min-1
. The curves show two main peaks similar to the composition A as discussed earlier.
However, a very small exothermic peak is also seen near the main decomposition peak
which may be attributed to partial decomposition of composite solid propellant. The
major peaks for thermal decomposition of composition B appear at 346.9oC, 362.4
oC,
374.1oC and 384.1
oC corresponding to heating rates of 10
oC min
-1, 20
oC min
-1, 30
oC min
-
1 and 40
oC min
-1 respectively. Although, conventionally used catalysts with particle size
in the range of micrometers also have the capability to catalyze the decomposition of
composite propellant, however, the results with the nano sized catalyst are generally
much better due to smaller particle size and greater exposed surface area.
Figure 7.10 Effect of heating rate on the heat flow curve of composition B
containing 2% nano zinc oxide as a catalyst
177
The pronounced effect in this case is the lowering of the decomposition temperature due
to the addition of the zinc oxide nano particles. The peak temperature lowers by
approximately 52oC at a heating rate of 10
oC min
-1. Similar trend is seen for the other
heating rates.
The mass loss curve obtained from thermogravimetery (TG) confirms the lowering of
decomposition temperature in composition B. The comparison of the mass loss curve for
composition A and B has been presented in Figure 7.11. The effect of heating rate on the
propellant composition B is shown in Figure 7.12.
Standard ASTM method has been followed for the calculation of the kinetic parameters
of composition A and B using DSC data based on Kissinger method. The experiments
were performed as per the recommendations of the international committee of thermal
analysis and calorimetry(ICTAC) [24].
Figure 7.11 Mass loss curve of propellant composition A and B
178
Figure 7.12 Mass loss pattern of propellant composition B at multiple heating rates
(b) Kinetic analysis by using DSC data (composition B)
The heat flow data obtained from DSC experiments at multiple heating rates has been
used to calculate the kinetic parameters of the propellant composition B as well for
comparison with composition A. The Kissinger graph for propellant composition B has
been presented in Figure 7.13. The effect of heating rate on the DSC curves and the
details of the kinetic data for composition B have been presented in Table 7.3.
T
h
Table 7.3 Kinetic parameters of composite solid propellant catalyzed with nano zinc
oxide calculated from DSC data by Kissinger Method (Composition B)
Heating Rate
(oC min
-1)
Peak Temp.
(oC)
Ea
(kJ mol-1
)
A
(sec-1
)
k
(sec-1
)
∆H#
(kJ mol-1
)
10 346.9 3.67 x 107 6.05 x 10
-3
20 362.4 116+6% 4.03 x 107 1.15 x 10
-2 111
30 374.1 3.92 x 107 1.66 x 10
-2
40 384.1 3.65 x 107 2.15 x 10
-2
179
e activation energy of composition B containing 2 percent catalyst has been found to be
116.1kJ mol-1
from the DSC data. This value is lower than the activation energy of
127.1kJ mol-1
for un-catalyzed propellant composition A. The decrease in the
decomposition temperature and activation energy of the composition B shows that a
significant catalytic activity has taken place. Moreover, the rate constant of the catalyzed
propellant composition B has also increased showing that it has become more reactive.
Figure 7.13 Graph representing the Kissinger method for determination of kinetic
parameters of composition B from DSC data.
Although, the mechanism of effect of the TMOs on the decomposition of composite
propellants is not very well understood, the fact that these TMOs significantly alter the
pattern of AP decomposition and modify the performance of composite propellants is
well established. The effects of lowering of the activation energy, decrease in the
decomposition temperature and increase in the rate constant are consistent with the
general trend reported in the literature on the effect of addition of TMOs on the thermal
cum kinetic behaviour of AP and propellants based on HTPB/AP. For instance, Patil et al
180
reported the effect of nano sized copper chromite and copper oxide on the thermal
decomposition of AP and they found decease in the peak temperature as well as the
activation energy in both the cases [8]. Moreover, Duan et al has very recently
investigated the thermal decomposition of AP catalyzed with different percentages of
nano magnesium oxide [7]. The authors reported that the decomposition peak
temperature is significantly lowered by the addition of MgO nano particles.
In case of the catalyzed thermal decomposition of composite solid propellant, the
frequency factor of composition B has decreased due to the decrease in the activation
energy. The average value of the frequency factor for composition B is 3.8 x 107s
-1 which
is lower than the average value of 4.6 x 107s
-1 for composition A. The rate constant for
composition B increases despite decrease in the frequency factor due to lowering of the
activation energy, which facilitates the rate of reaction. For both the propellant
compositions, the rate constant increases with increase in the peak temperatures as a
consequence of increasing heating rates. The enthalpy of activation also decreases due to
the decrease in the activation energy for composition B.
(c) Kinetic analysis by using TG data (composition B)
The TG data obtained at multiple heating rates has also been used to evaluate the kinetic
parameters of the composite propellant by three different methods. The isoconversional
kinetic analysis of the composition B also confirms that the activation energy of the
composite solid propellant has lowered by the addition of catalyst. The activation energy
of composition B has been determined for α = 0.2, α = 0.3, α = 0.4, α = 0.5, α = 0.6 and α
= 0.7 for comparison with composition A under identical conditions.
The activation energy for composition B was found to be 107.2 kJmol-1
, 117.5 kJmol-1
and 123.5 kJmol-1
for KAS, Friedman and FWO method respectively (α=0.4) by using
TG data. The activation energy values corresponding to different conversion degrees are
presented in Table 7.4. The representative graphs of all the three isoconversional
181
methods for estimation of activation energy of composition B are given in Figure
7.14(a),7.14(b) and 7.14(c) for (α=0.4).
Table 7.4 Activation energy data corresponding to degree of conversion for
propellant composition B ( calculated from TG data).
Figure 7.14(a) Graph representing the Friedman method for determination of kinetic
parameters of nano zinc oxide catalyzed composite propellant from TG
data
Activation Energy (kJmol-1
)
Method
Friedman 125.9
118.2
117.5
121.6
125.4
127.2
FWO 132.5
124.3
123.5
127.9
131.9
133.8
KAS 116.1
108.1
107.2
111.2
114.8
116.5
182
Figure 7.14(b) Graph representing the FWO method for determination of kinetic
parameters of nano zinc oxide catalyzed composite propellant from
TG data
Figure 7.14 (c) Graph representing the KAS method for determination of kinetic
parameters of zinc oxide catalyzed composite propellant from TG
data
183
The isoconversional kinetic analysis shows that the activation energy of composite solid
propellant composition B varies with the extent of conversion (α) as the reaction
proceeds. The trend of activation energy variation in this case is shown in Figure 7.15
which represents the “E” versus “α” curve for composition B by three different
isoconversional methods.
Figure 7.15 Plot showing the activation energies versus extent of conversion for
composition B by three different methods (calculated from TG data)
The exact mechanism by which TMOs influence the decomposition kinetics of composite
solid propellants is yet to be clearly understood. Ebrahim et al proposed a mechanism for
the thermal decomposition of ammonium perchlorate in the presence of p type
semiconductors such as CuO as a catalyst on the basis of electron transfer to ammonium
ion from perchlorate ion [25].
This electron transfer process is considered to be the rate controlling step. The „p‟ type
semiconductors (ZnO in this case) have a large number of holes on their surface due to
which, they accelerate the electron transfer process.
(7.8)
184
is the oxygen atom that is abstracted from oxide and represents positive
hole in valence band of the oxide.
The comparison of the results for propellant compositions A and B shows that the
addition of nano zinc oxide catalyst has significantly altered the thermal and kinetic
behaviour of the composite propellant. It has shown good catalytic activity by lowering
the decomposition temperature and increased the reactivity of the composite propellant.
The results of thermal cum kinetic analysis for composition A and B are presented in
detail in Table 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 and 7.4.
7.4.5 Analysis of Propellant composition C
(a) Thermal analysis
Thermal analysis of the composite propellant catalyzed with magnesium oxide nano
particle has also been carried out in the temperature range of 50oC-550
oC. The DSC
curves for catalyzed composite propellant at multiple heating rates are presented in
Figure 7.16.
Figure 7.16 The DSC curves for MgO catalyzed composite propellant at
multiple heating rates
185
The curve for the catalyzed propellant also shows two main peaks similar to non-
catalyzed version of the propellant. First peak related to phase transformation of AP did
not change much and appeared nearly at the same temperature close to 250oC. The
second peak however has changed a lot in terms of its position and shape. The peak
appears at a temperature of 377.1oC at a heating rate of 10
oC min
-1. This means that the
decomposition temperature of the catalyzed composite propellant has lowered by
approximately 22oC due to addition of MgO nano particles. Moreover, the decomposition
peaks in the catalyzed propellant are relatively sharp as compared to the ones for non-
catalyzed propellant. The decomposition peaks in this case also shift to higher
temperatures when the heating rates are increased. The peak temperatures for the
catalyzed version of propellant are 377.1oC, 391.5
oC, 400.6
oC and 407.9
oC respectively
for heating rates of 10oC min
-1, 20
oC min
-1, 30
oC min
-1 and 40
oC min
-1.
The TG curves for the catalyzed propellant are shown in Figure 7.17 at different heating
rates.
Figure 7.17 The TG curves for the MgO catalyzed propellant at multiple heating rates
186
In this case, there is no significant change in the mass of the sample till 300oC but beyond
this temperature there is a rapid mass loss due to decomposition of the composite
propellant. The TG curve also confirms lowering of the decomposition temperature in the
catalyzed version of propellant. The effect of heating rate is similar to the one seen for
non-catalyzed sample of composite propellant.
(b) Kinetic analysis by using DSC data (composition C )
The heat flow data obtained from DSC experiments at multiple heating rates has been
used to calculate the kinetic parameters of the propellant composition C. The multiple
heating rate experiments were performed under exactly the same set of experimental
conditions to investigate the effect of the catalyst on the kinetic behaviour of composite
propellant. The Kissinger method for catalyzed version of the propellant has been
depicted in Figure 7.18.
Figure 7.18 The Kissinger graph for catalyzed version of the
propellant (Composition C)
187
The activation energy calculated from the slope of the Kissinger graph came out to be
155.4kJ mol-1
for the catalyzed propellant. This value is higher than the activation energy
of 127.1kJmol-1
for the non-catalyzed version of the propellant calculated by the
Kissinger method. The average value of the frequency factor or the pre exponential factor
in this case has been found to be 2.27X1010
and it is nearly three orders of magnitudes
higher than the value obtained for non-catalyzed propellant (Table 7.5). The rate constant
in this case is 7.37 x 10-3
which is nearly 30 percent higher than that of the non- catalyzed
propellant.
Generally speaking, the addition of catalyst should have lowered the value of activation
energy but in our case the experimental results and the kinetic evaluation shows that it
has rather increased. During the literature survey, it was found that the activation energy
of AP may increase or decrease by the addition of catalyst and the results differ from case
to case. Some researchers have reported on the basis of actual experimental results that
the activation energy of ammonium perchlorate was found to increase after the catalytic
activity [6,9,26]. It is important to note here that the rate constant has increased by 30
percent despite the increase in the activation energy. The main reason for this is that the
rate constant has a very strong dependence on the frequency factor A which has increased
by three orders of magnitude and, therefore, the overall rate constant has increased. The
rate constant further increases with the increase in the peak temperatures.
Table 7.5 Kinetic data obtained by Kissinger Method for MgO catalyzed
composite propellant from DSC data (Composition C)
Heating Rate
(oC min
-1)
Peak Temp.
(oC)
Ea
(kJ mol-1
)
A
(sec-1
)
k
(sec-1
)
∆H#
(kJ mol-1
)
10 377.1 2.25 x 1010
7.4 x 10-3
20 391.5 155+ 2% 2.31 x 1010
14.1 x 10-3
150
30 400.6 2.30 x 1010
20.5 x 10-3
40 407.9 2.23 x 1010
26.8 x 10-3
188
The comparative analysis of the two versions of the propellant by Kissinger method
clearly indicates that the kinetic behaviour of the composite propellant has significantly
changed by the addition of nano magnesium oxide as a catalyst. The activation energy of
the catalyzed propellant has increased by 22 percent and the frequency factor has
increased tremendously by 3 orders of magnitude. It is worth mentioning here that the
overall reactivity of the composite propellant has increased due to addition of the catalyst
because the rate constant has increased by nearly 30 percent.
(c)Kinetic analysis by using TG data (composition C )
The TG data obtained at multiple heating rates has also been used to evaluate the kinetic
parameters of the composite propellant by three different methods. The isoconversional
analysis of the non-catalyzed propellant showed that the activation energy value changes
as the degree of conversion increases. Therefore, it was obligatory to carry out the
isoconversional kinetic analysis of the catalyzed propellant as well to elucidate the
changes caused by the catalyst. Three different isoconversional methods have been used
for the analysis which includes Friedman method, Flynn–Wall–Ozawa method and
Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose method. With each kinetic method, activation energy has been
calculated at six different values of conversion (α) i.e. α = 0.2, α = 0.3, α = 0.4, α = 0.5, α
= 0.6 and α = 0.7.
The detailed analysis of the catalyzed propellant showed that the activation energy has
increased by the addition of the catalyst throughout the decomposition process. The
increase in activation energy was confirmed by all the three isoconversional methods. For
instance the activation energy of the non-catalyzed propellant at 30 percent conversion (α
= 0.3) was found to be 116 kJ/mol, 126.9 kJ/mol and 133.5 kJ/mol for KAS, Friedman
and FWO method respectively. Whereas, for the same degree of conversion (α = 0.3), the
activation energy values of the catalyzed propellant were found to be 142.6 kJ/mol, 153.2
kJ/mol and 161.2 kJ/mol respectively KAS, Friedman and FWO method. Similar kind of
increase in activation energy can be seen for the other degrees of conversion from Table
7.6. The representative graphs of all the three kinetic evaluation method are presented in
Figure 7.19(a), 7.19(b) and 7.19(c).
189
Table 7.6 Activation energy data corresponding to different degrees of conversion for
MgO catalyzed composite propellant calculated from TG data
Figure 7.19(a) Representative graph of Friedman method for kinetic evaluation
of the propellant composition C
We had noted for the non-catalyzed propellant that the activation energy depends on the
degree of conversion and shows the variation. Similarly, the catalyzed propellant also
Activation Energy *(Eα)
Method E0.2 E0.3 E0.4 E0.5 E0.6 E0.7
KAS 118.8
142.6
152.5
160.4
157.5
164.2
Friedman 132.2
153.2
163.3
171.3
168.5
175.3
FWO 139.1
161.2
171.8
180.1
177.2
184.4
*(Eα) represents the activation energy corresponding to a specific degree of
conversion (α)
190
Figure 7.19(b) Representative graph of Flynn–Wall–Ozawa method for kinetic
evaluation of the propellant composition C
Figure 7.19(c) Representative graph of Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose method for kinetic
evaluation of the propellant composition C
shows variation in the activation energy values for different conversions. The “E” versus
“α” curve of the catalyzed version of the composite propellant has been shown in Figure
191
7.20 which indicates the activation energy trend against the degree of conversion (α) by
three isoconversional methods.
Figure 7.20 The “E” versus “α” curve of the composite propellant composition C
It is evident from the thermal and kinetic analysis presented above that the magnesium
oxide nano particles play an important role in catalyzing the thermal decomposition of
the composite propellants. Similarly some other transition metal oxides (TMOs) are also
reported in literature for catalyzing the decomposition of the AP and AP containing
composite propellants.
7.5 Estimation of critical ignition temperature
Critical ignition temperature (Tb) is an important parameter related to explosives,
propellants and pyrotechnic. This parameter can be used to predict the safety of energetic
materials during storage, processing and transportation. The propellant charge may be
considered safe if its Tb is adequately higher than ambient range of temperatures
encountered during its storage, transportation and use. Critical temperature of thermal
192
ignition (Tb) can be estimated from the obtained thermal and kinetic parameters and
employing the under mentioned formulae [27,28]. The method was proposed by Tonglai
et al. and it is very common now [29].
√
(7.9)
Where is the critical temperature of thermal ignition, “E” represents activation
energy, “R” is the universal gas constant. The “ ” is the onset temperature
corresponding to → 0 and can be estimated using polynomial regression coefficients
using equation (11).
(7.10)
The values of obtained by using equation (7.10) are 381oC and 329
oC respectively for
the propellant composition A and B respectively. The values of critical temperatures
calculated from equation (7.9) and using the above mentioned values of are 391oC
and 337oC respectively for composition A and B respectively. Although, the critical
temperature of composition B has been lowered by 51oC, however, it is still sufficiently
higher than the commonly encountered range of temperatures during storage and
handling.
Similarly value of for propellant composition C obtained by using equation (7.10) is
369oC. The value of critical ignition temperature obtained by using equation (7.9) is
376oC. This value is lower than the one for composition A but it is still higher than the
commonly encountered range of temperatures during storage and handling.
7.6 Conclusions
Three versions of composite propellant have been investigated in this chapter and the
important results are described below for composition of composition A, B and C. The
propellant composition “A” showed an endothermic peak near 250oC representing the
solid state phase transformation of AP present in the composite propellant. The propellant
composition “A” decomposed thermally at a temperature of 398.8oC at a heating rate of
10oCmin
-1. The activation energy of the non-catalyzed propellant was found to be
193
127kJmol-1
by Kissinger method. The frequency factor was found to be 4.46 x 107 per
second and the rate of reaction constant was 5.66 x 10-3
per second. The activation energy
data of the composition “A” showed variation with respect to the degree of conversion α.
The thermal and kinetic evaluation of composite propellant composition “B” showed that
the first endothermic peak of the composition “B” did not change much after the addition
of the ZnO catalyst. The propellant composition “B” decomposed thermally at a
temperature of 346.9oC which is nearly 52
oC lower than the peak temperature of the
composition “A”. The activation energy of ZnO catalyzed propellant was fond to be
116kJmol-1
which is slightly lower than the activation energy of composition “A”. The
frequency factor of the composition “B” decreased to 3.67 x 107 per second and the rate
of reaction constant increased to 6.05 x 10-3
per second. The activation energy data of the
composition “B” also showed some variation with respect to the degree of conversion α,
however, the trend was different as compared to composition “A”.
The thermal analysis of propellant composition “C” showed that the first endothermic
peak of the composition “C” did not change much after the addition of the MgO catalyst.
The propellant composition “C” decomposed thermally at a temperature of 377.1oC
which is nearly 22oC lower than the peak temperature of the composition “A”. The
activation energy of MgO catalyzed propellant was fond to be 155kJmol-1
which is higher
than the activation energy of composition “A”. The frequency factor of the composition
“C” was found increased by three orders of magnitude to 2.25 x 1010
per second and the
rate of reaction constant increased by nearly 30 percent. The activation energy data of
the composition “C” also showed variations with respect to the degree of conversion α,
however, the trend was different as compared to composition “A” and “B”.
References
[1] G. Singh, I.P.S. Kapoor, S. Dubey, P.F. Siril, Propellants, Explosives,
Pyrotechnics 34 (2009).
[2] K. Kreitz, E. Petersen, D. Reid, S. Seal, Combustion Science and Technology 184
(2012) 750.
194
[3] K. Ishitha, P. Ramakrishna, Combustion and Flame (2014).
[4] S. Ramamurthy, P. Shrotri, Journal of Energetic Materials 14 (1996) 97.
[5] S. Shioya, M. Kohga, T. Naya, Combustion and Flame 161 (2014) 620.
[6] P.R. Patil, V.e.N. Krishnamurthy, S.S. Joshi, Propellants, Explosives,
Pyrotechnics 31 (2006) 442.
[7] G. Duan, X. Yang, J. Chen, G. Huang, L. Lu, X. Wang, Powder technology 172
(2007) 27.
[8] P.R. Patil, V.e.N. Krishnamurthy, S.S. Joshi, Propellants, Explosives,
Pyrotechnics 33 (2008) 266.
[9] K. Kishore, V.R.P. Verneker, M.R. Sunitha, Journal of Applied Chemistry and
Biotechnology 27 (1977) 415.
[10] S. Chaturvedi, P.N. Dave, Journal of Saudi Chemical Society 17 (2013) 135.
[11] X. Sun, X. Qiu, L. Li, G. Li, Inorganic chemistry 47 (2008) 4146.
[12] G. Tang, S. Tian, Z. Zhou, Y. Wen, A. Pang, Y. Zhang, D. Zeng, H. Li, B. Shan,
C. Xie, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 118 (2014) 11833.
[13] M. Kohga, K. Okamoto, Combustion and Flame 158 (2011) 573.
[14] M. Shamsipur, S.M. Pourmortazavi, S.S. Hajimirsadeghi, Combustion Science
and Technology 183 (2011) 575.
[15] M. Shamsipur, S.M. Pourmortazavi, M. Roushani, A.A. Miran Beigi, Combustion
Science and Technology 185 (2013) 122.
[16] J. Lima, A. Frutuoso, K. Iha, M. Ionashiro, J. Matos, M. Suárez-Iha, J. Therm.
Anal. Calorim 75 (2004) 551.
[17] Y. Zhu, H. Huang, H. Ren, Q. Jiao, Journal of Energetic Materials 32 (2014) 16.
[18] H.E. Kissinger, Analytical chemistry 29 (1957) 1702.
[19] M. Venkatesh, P. Ravi, S.P. Tewari, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 117
(2013) 10162.
[20] T. Vlase, G. Vlase, N. Birta, N. Doca, Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry
88 (2007) 631.
[21] B. Janković, Chemical Engineering Journal 139 (2008) 128.
[22] A.Q. Malik, Caspian Journal of Applied Sciences Research 2 (2013).
195
[23] J. Rocco, J. Lima, A. Frutuoso, K. Iha, M. Ionashiro, J. Matos, M. Suárez-Iha,
Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry 75 (2004) 551.
[24] S. Vyazovkin, A.K. Burnham, J.M. Criado, L.A. Pérez-Maqueda, C. Popescu, N.
Sbirrazzuoli, Thermochimica Acta 520 (2011) 1.
[25] E. Alizadeh-Gheshlaghi, B. Shaabani, A. Khodayari, Y. Azizian-Kalandaragh, R.
Rahimi, Powder technology 217 (2012) 330.
[26] B. Dubey, N. Singh, J. Srivastava, A. Ojha, Indian J Chem 40 (2001) 841.
[27] A. Eslami, S. Hosseini, S. Pourmortazavi, Fuel 87 (2008) 3339.
[28] S.G. Hosseini, A. Eslami, Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry 101 (2010)
1111.
[29] Z. Tonglai, H. Rongzu, X. Yi, L. Fuping, Thermochimica Acta 244 (1994) 171.
196
Chapter 8
General Conclusions
Energetic materials viz. propellants and pyrotechnics being very sensitive in nature
require some special and safe techniques for their thermal and kinetic studies. Thermal
analytical techniques are essentially very safe for the investigation of energetic materials
due to the fact that a very small quantity of sample in the range of few milligrams is
required for the analysis. The ignition of such a minute quantity of the energetic materials
does not damage the instrument or its surroundings. Thermal techniques including DTA,
DSC and TG were mostly used for the accomplishment of the present work along with
some other techniques which include X-ray diffraction technique (XRD), scanning
electron microscope (SEM) and particle size analyzer. The set of above mentioned
thermal techniques provided important information such as decomposition, ignition, solid
state phase transformations, melting etc. Accordingly, the obtained thermal data was
used to calculate the kinetic parameters vis-à-vis reactivity to elucidate the reaction
mechanism of the pyrotechnics and propellants. The scanning electron microscopy and x-
ray diffraction provided valuable information regarding crystal structure, phase
composition and morphology.
Thermal cum kinetic behaviour of five different oxidizers including ammonium
perchlorate, ammonium nitrate, potassium nitrate, barium nitrate and potassium
permanganate was investigated under similar reaction conditions. On the basis of
comparative analysis in terms of solid state transformations, decomposition temperatures,
activation energy and oxygen balance data of the five oxidizers, it was found that
ammonium perchlorate has an edge over the remaining oxidizers and that is why it is
used in wide variety of propellant and pyrotechnic composition.
The micro porous barium nitrate was synthesized to improve its ignition reliability by
using three different vesicants. The results indicate the presence of micro sized pores in
197
three modified versions of barium nitrate. The exposed area of vesicant modified barium
nitrate increased due to the production of micro pores and improved the reactivity of the
barium nitrate. The bulk density of barium nitrate was found to reduce in all the cases
after the modification. The reduction in the bulk density is attributed to the production of
micro pores. The crystal structure and the cell parameters of the barium nitrate did not
change after the modification. The crystallite size of the barium nitrate reduced after
modification with vesicants. The pyrotechnic composition containing aluminum powder
and micro porous barium nitrate ignited at a lower temperature as compared to the one
formulated with pure barium nitrate.
The MgO nano particles were used to catalyze the thermal decomposition of ammonium
perchlorate. The DTA peaks reduced from three to two in the catalyzed version of AP.
The two distinct decomposition stages of the pure AP decomposition merged with each
other and reduced to a single stage. The thermal decomposition of catalyzed AP took
place at a temperature significantly lower than the peak temperature of the high
temperature decomposition stage but higher than the peak temperature of the low
temperature decomposition stage. The frequency factor increased and caused nearly
twenty three percent increases in the rate of reaction constant despite increase in the value
of activation energy.
Experimental investigation of the thermal and kinetic behaviour of three pyrotechnic
compositions containing aluminum or magnesium fuel was carried out to elucidate the
decomposition process and to evaluate their stability and reactivity. The pyrotechnic
mixture containing Al / Ba(NO3)2 is the least reactive amongst the three investigated
mixtures as it has the lowest value of the reaction rate constant. The mixture is most
stable thermally due to the highest value of its critical ignition temperature i.e. nearly
599oC. Activation energy of the mixture containing Mg/ NH4ClO4 is the highest amongst
the three compositions and therefore it is relatively difficult to ignite. However, once
ignited the mixture is very reactive and has the highest value of the reaction rate constant.
The composition is thermally very stable and has a fairly high value of the critical
ignition temperature. The pyrotechnic mixture containing Mg/KMnO4 is very easy to
ignite as it has the lowest value of activation energy and it is fairly reactive. The rate
198
constant is higher than the mixture containing barium nitrate but lower than the one
containing ammonium perchlorate. All the three investigated compositions were found to
be thermally stable and the relative reactivity of these pyrotechnic mixtures decreased in
the following order:
Mg + NH4ClO4 > Mg + KMnO4 > Al + Ba(NO3)2
The effect of aging i.e. high temperatures and elevated humidity levels on two very
commonly used military pyrotechnics was studied. SR-524 pyrotechnic composition
containing the magnesium and sodium nitrate was investigated before and after the aging
and the decomposition temperature of the aged composition was found to be lowered by
14oC. The kinetic parameters of the pyrotechnic mixture also changed considerably after
the aging. The activation energy of aged composition decreased nearly by 57 percent and
the frequency factor also decreased noticeably. The aging process made the composition
easy to ignite by lowering the activation energy, however, the overall reactivity of the
composition reduced due to decrease in the rate constant. High humidity levels resulted in
the production of magnesium hydroxide as the reaction product of the aging process.
Similarly, ignition temperature of the aged SR-562 pyrotechnic composition was found to
increase by nearly 51oC. There was nearly 22 percent decrease in the value of activation
energy of the aged composition as compared to the fresh composition. The reaction rate
constant was decreased by nearly 30 percent after the aging despite decrease in the value
of activation energy due to the fact that the pre exponential factor decreased considerably.
The aged composition became easy to ignite due to lowering of activation energy but its
reactivity decreased due to lowering of the reaction rate constant. The aged composition
showed the presence of magnesium hydroxide formed due to reaction of some of the
magnesium with water vapours. It is therefore concluded that high humidity and elevated
temperatures have a strong influence on the thermal behaviour, kinetic parameters and
morphology of pyrotechnic compositions containing the magnesium fuel.
Three different versions of the composite propellant were evaluated for their thermal
behaviour and kinetics. The magnesium oxide and zinc oxide nano particles were used as
catalysts. The propellant composition “A” decomposed thermally at a temperature of
199
398.8oC. The activation energy of the propellant was found to be 127kJmol
-1 by the
Kissinger method. The frequency factor was found to be 4.46 x 107 per second and the
rate of reaction constant was 5.66 x 10-3
per second. The activation energy data of the
composition “A” showed variations with respect to the degree of conversion α.
ZnO catalyzed propellant composition “B” decomposed thermally at a temperature of
346.9oC which is nearly 52
oC lower than the peak temperature of the composition “A”.
The activation energy of this composition was fond to be lower than the activation energy
of composition “A”. The frequency factor of the composition “B” decreased to 3.67 x 107
per second and the rate of reaction constant increased to 6.05 x 10-3
per second. The
activation energy data of the composition “B” also showed some variation with respect to
the degree of conversion α, however, the trend was different as compared to composition
“A”.
MgO catalyzed propellant composition “C” decomposed thermally at a temperature of
377.1oC which is nearly 22
oC lower than the peak temperature of the composition “A”.
The activation energy of MgO catalyzed propellant was fond to be 155kJmol-1
which is
higher than the activation energy of composition “A”. The frequency factor of the
composition “C” was found to be increased by three orders of magnitude to 2.25 x 1010
per second and the rate of reaction constant increased by nearly 30 percent. The
activation energy data of the composition “C” also showed variations with respect to the
degree of conversion α, however, the trend was different as compared to both the
composition “A” and “B”.
It was found during the literature review that there is a lack of theoretical understanding
and experimental work concerning the reaction kinetics of the pyrotechnics. The earlier
reported work presents some individual studies concerning thermal behaviour, kinetics,
aging etc. of the pyrotechnic compositions and their ingredients. The present work was
aimed at providing a systematic insight into the thermal behaviour, kinetics, aging and
morphological aspects of pyrotechnics/propellants. The comparative analysis of five
oxidizers was carried out to identify their strengths and weaknesses and to get an insight
200
into the role of these oxidizers when they are subsequently used in various energetic
compositions. Two selected oxidizers i.e. ammonium perchlorate and barium nitrate were
then modified to increase their reactivity by using a nano catalyst and inorganic vesicants
respectively. Three pyrotechnic mixtures were synthesized by adding aluminum and
magnesium fuel to oxidizers and their ignition, kinetics and stability was studied.
Temperature and humidity are the most important factors that influence the shelf life and
ignition behaviour of the pyrotechnics. Therefore, the effect of high temperatures and
high humidity was studied for two commonly used military pyrotechnic compositions.
The thermal and kinetic behaviour of the composite solid propellant was investigated in
detail and the reactivity of the composite propellant was enhanced by using nano sized
magnesium oxide and zinc oxide.
In conclusion, the studies pertaining to the thermal behaviour, kinetics, thermal stability,
aging and the effect of different additives provide valuable information to the user for
assessing the stability and reactivity of pyrotechnic/propellant compositions during
processing, handling, storage, transportation and usage. These studies are also beneficial
for improving the behaviour of existing compositions as well as for the formulation of the
new energetic compositions for specific requirements.
Future Recommendations
1. Thermal decomposition, ignition behaviour and kinetic evaluation of Boron and
Tin fueled pyrotechnic compositions may be carried out to assess their thermal stability
and relative reactivity by using different oxidizers.
2. The catalytic decomposition of composite solid propellants to improve their
thermal behaviour and reactivity by using some nano sized transition metal oxides, that
are not reported earlier, could be an interesting piece of research.