thermal drying of biomaterials with porous carriers
TRANSCRIPT
This article was downloaded by: [Columbia University]On: 07 October 2014, At: 05:55Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Drying Technology: An International JournalPublication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ldrt20
Thermal Drying of Biomaterials with Porous CarriersC.Z. Stmmilto a , I. Zbicinski a & X. D. Liu ba Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering. Technical University of Loódzź. ul.Woólczanska , Loódzź, 175.90–924, Loódzźb Depanment of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin Institute of Light Industry. 1038 Dagu NanluRoad , Tianjin, P.R., 300222, ChinaPublished online: 19 Oct 2007.
To cite this article: C.Z. Stmmilto , I. Zbicinski & X. D. Liu (1995) Thermal Drying of Biomaterials with Porous Carriers, DryingTechnology: An International Journal, 13:5-7, 1447-1462, DOI: 10.1080/07373939508917032
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07373939508917032
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) containedin the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of theContent. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, andare not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon andshould be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable forany losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoeveror howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use ofthe Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematicreproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in anyform to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
DRYING TECHNOLOGY. 13(5-7). 1447-1462 (1995)
THERMAL DRYING OF BIOMATERIALS WITH POROUS CARRIERS
Cz. Strumillot. I. Zbicinskil and X. D. LiuZ 1. Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering. Technical University
of t o d i , ul. Wolczariska 175. 90-924. L o d i Poland 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering. Tianjin Institute of Light Industry.
1038 Dagu Nanlu Road. 300222. Tianjin, P.R. China
Key Words and Phrases: dehumidified air; drying with carrier; quality retention; thermosensitive material; yeast
ABSTRACT
Thermal drylng of bioproducts often leads to a significant deterioration of product quality. One of the simplest methods for bener quality retention of thermosensitive materials is drying of the materials in a mixture with porous carriers. In order to determine the effect of carriers presence on the mechanism of dehydration process a set of experiments was carried out in a laboratory vibrofluidized bed dryer. The experiments were performed for three different carriers (wheat bran, ground rape and flour). Baker's yeast was taken as an example of a sensitive material. The effect of following parameters on degradation processes was analysed: concentration and kind of a carrier. temperarure and flowrate of inlet air and frequency of a vibrated bed. The analysis of the results proves that temperature of inlet air and kind and concentration of a carrier are the most important factors affecting final product quality. The results show that the main effect of a carrier's presence on quality retention comprises changes of a structure of labile material. Sorptional properties of the carrier are less imponant. In second part of the work dehumidified air was applied as a drying agent to enhance quality retention of biomaterials. Results obtained are encouraging, however this method requires further research.
Copyright 0 1995 by Marsel Dckkcr. Ins
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Col
umbi
a U
nive
rsity
] at
05:
55 0
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
INTRODUCTION
During thermal drying of biosynthesis products, such as bakets and brewets
yeast. antibiotics, vitamins, enzymes, protein product etc., different types of
degradation processes may occur L1). The degradation processes not only depends
on drying process parameters (temperature. air flow etc.) but also on physical
characteristics of biosynthesis materials such as particle size, porosity,
hygroscopicity etc.
To obtain good product quality a proper choice of drying equipment and
operating parameters of the process is decisive. There are also other possibilities to
enhance final quality of labile materials. One of the simple methods is drying of the
materials in a mixture with porous carriers (2. 3. 4). However, this method can be
applied if the carrier and the labile material do not have to be separated after drying
vrocess.
Carriers mixed with biomaterials decrease biomass' moisture content (by
absorption of water). change their porosity and surface/volume ratio a. These
effects improve drying characteristics and lead to better retention of product's
quality after thermal drying. Some biomaterials, such as most of bacteria and some
paste like materials can hardly be formed into granules and dried in directly
fluidized bed or drum dryers. However, if they are mixed with porous carriers or sprayed onto a fluidized bed of a carrier; fluidized bed dryers or rotary dryers can
be applied. . .
Another possibility to improve drying quality indexes for labile materials
might be using dehumidified air as a drying agent. In the atmosphere of dry air
driving force is higher and wet-bulb ;emperatwe of the material is lower than in the
atmosphere of ambient air. The latter effect may be particularly important to
maintain high quality of thermosensitive products.
No research in this field has been reported in the literature. The main aim of
this work was to determine a drying mechanism in the presence of porous carriers
and to evaluate the application of dry air as a drying agent for sensitive materials.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Col
umbi
a U
nive
rsity
] at
05:
55 0
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
B1OMATERlAL.S WITH POROUS CARRIERS 1449
SIGNIFICANT TEST FOR QUALITY RETENTION OF BAKER'S YEAST
Bake<s yeast (S. cerevisae) with average initial moisture content 2.3 k g k g
was mixed with three types o f carriers, wheat bran, extracted ground rape and
flour, in different concentrations and then the mixtures were exuuded into pellets o f
about 1.0 mm in diameter.
The experiments were performed in a laboratory scale, batch-type
Mbrofluidized bed dryer 150 mm in diameter. The range o f operating parameters is
shown in Table I
To minimise the number of experiments, they were designed by the method
o f the right intersection (i) and the total number o f experiments was 27.
As quality criteria the relative viability. RVy, and saccharolytic activity.
RAY, of yeast were applied. The viability is defined as a ratio o f the number o f
living cells to the total number of cells:
v y = Number of Living Cells
Total Number of Cells
The relative viability is expressed as a ratio o f the actual to the initial content o f
living cells in the sample:
To evaluate the relative activity o f yeast. oxygen-fiee activity o f mass transfer (CO,
production) was determined on the basis o f manometric measurements with Jalecki
apparatus.
Activity o f yeast is defined by equation (3):
Ay = Volume of CO, Production Unit Weight of Yeast. Unit of Time
(3)
Relative activity ofyeast is described by equation (4):
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Col
umbi
a U
nive
rsity
] at
05:
55 0
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
TABLE I. Range of overatinn parameters
I T, i. I v I f I 13 1 c I - ... ... .- . -
60 1 40 1 5.00 1 rape I 0 I I 90 I 50 I 6.67 I bran I 25
120 60 8.33 flour 50
A detailed description of the methods used to determine RVy and RAy was given in
(1).
Results of the significant test for relative viability and activity are displayed
on figures I and 2, respectively. The values of F ,,,,, F,,,, and F ,,,, are the critical values of F distribution in the figures.
5 Figure I and 2 show that among all the parameters considered, the
temperature of inlet air. T,,j,, concentration of a carrier. c, and kind of a carrier. p, are significant for both viability and activity during thermal dlying of baker's yeast. On the basis of the above mentioned results two effects were investigated
thoroughly; the effect of a carrier concentration and the effect of a kind of a carrier
on the final quality of bakefs yeast.
EFFECT OF A CARRIER CONCENTRATION ON THE FINAL QUALITY OF BAKER'S YEAST
In the first step to analyse this effect, basic properties of baker yeast and
mixtures of bakeh yeast and carriers were determined by the benzene soaking method (6). Table ? presents initial moisture contents, X, and bed voidages, 6 (%).
for different mixtures.
Table 2 shows that the most porous structures of a mixture yeast-carriers contain wheat bran, less porous ones contain flour.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Col
umbi
a U
nive
rsity
] at
05:
55 0
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
BIOMATERIALS WITH POROUS CARRIERS
Figure 1 Significant test for the relative viability
Figure 2 Significant test for the relative act iv i ty
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Col
umbi
a U
nive
rsity
] at
05:
55 0
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
STRUMIUO. ZBICI~~SKI, AND LIU
TABLE 2 Pro~enies ofbaker's veast. carriers and their mixtures
Figure 3 reports the results o f vibrofluidized bed drying and activity
degrada!ion o f baker's yeast mixed with wheat bran at different concentrations.
Mixtures containing more carrier show different degradation hnetics and better
final quality retention than mixtures with less carrier. The retention o f final activity
for the mixture with 50% o f bran is around 74% while yeast without a carrier
degrades to about 45% of the initial activity.
In the mixture, the carrier introduces non-themal-sorptional mechanism o f
moisture removal from yeast. Presence of a carrier decreases the initial moisture
content of the mixture (Table 2). For bran concentration of 25 %, the average
moisture content o f yeast decreases from 2.36 kgkg to 1.41 kgkg.
This amount o f moisture was removed by sorption to the carrier. The rest of
the moisture (from 1.41 kgkg to the desire moisture content) is removed thermally
by dewatering during the drying process.
Similar conclusions can be drawn from the analysis of the viability
deterioration rate for different carrier concentrations.
The relative deterioration rate can be described by K,, defined by an empirical
first-order kinetic model:
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Col
umbi
a U
nive
rsity
] at
05:
55 0
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
BIOMATERIALS WITH POROUS CARRIERS
Figure 3 The activity degradotion of boker's yeost with wheat bran in different concentrotions
Ta, ,n-600~. h-S.5crn
Where Q is the quality criterion of bakeh yeast. that is, relative activity or
viability. The tint-order rate constant K, has the form :
w r . 0
0.6
0.4
KO = (k,+ k, X+k, T,+k, X T,) exp[(k,+k, X)l(273.1 S+T,,)I (6 )
- G-.--l I 0 2- - [ 0 - pure ysoel - . - ycost with 25% bran - yeast wi th 50% bmn -
where X and T, are the moisture content and temperature of dryed material.
respectively. and k, . k, . ... . k, are the constants determined experimentally.
Figures 4. 5 and 6 show that curves describing relative degradation rate differ
significantly for different concentrations of a carrier. For yeast without a carrier the
degradation rate is high. Unprotected yeast cells are subjected to high ambient
temperature which promotes a high killing rate. The presence of carriers protects
panicles of thermosensitive materials from a direct contact with a drying agent which
makes the degradation curve flat. The more water is removed on contact-sorption
way the better final quality can be achieved.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Col
umbi
a U
nive
rsity
] at
05:
55 0
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
Figure 4 Relative deterioration rote of viability fo r the mixture with bran (50%)
Figure 5 Relative deter iorat ion rate o f viabil i ty f o r the mixture with bran (25%)
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Col
umbi
a U
nive
rsity
] at
05:
55 0
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
BIOMATERIALS WITH WROUS CARRIERS
Figure 6 Relative deterioration rote of viability for the baker's yeast without carrier
EFFECT OF A KIND OF CARRIER ON THE FINAL QUALITY OF BAKER'S YEAST
Each of the three carries used in the experiments (wheat bran, extracted
ground rape and flour) is characterised by different porosity (see Table 2) and
hygroscopicity (1).
The most hygroscopic material is flour the less is bran (2). Let us analyse results of experiments for drying at a relatively high temperature of air (90 OC) and
for identical content of a carrier (15% mass) in a mixture [initial moisture content of
the mixture was similar (Table 2)).
Figure 7 represents deterioration of relative activity of bakefs yeast as a
function of moisture content. Figure 7 shows that relative activity for each mixture differs significantly. The best results were obtained for a mixture with bran where the final retention of the quality was equal to 42'70, the wont for flour as a canier (retention of the activity was only 26%). Similar analysis can be carried out on the
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Col
umbi
a U
nive
rsity
] at
05:
55 0
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
Figure 7 Degradation of relative activity of baker's yeast with different carriers
basis of the relative deterioration rate of yeast activity. Figures 8. 9 and 10 present
changes of the degradation rate constant as a function of moisture content as well as temperature of the material.
A typical shape of the degradation function was obtained for each carrier 0. A sharp increase of the degradation rate from the beginning of the process to a
certain value of moisture content of the material and then decrease of the degradation rate can be observed. The biggest increase of the deterioration rate was observed for the mixture with flour, the smallest one for wheat bran. The analysis of results proves
that a carrier which "produces" a more porous mixture with biomaterial improves the
drying characteristics and promotes. better quality retention. Hygroscopicity of a carrier plays less important role in this case. Changes in. the structure of the dried
material and developing of heat and mass transfer area are the key factors promoting
quality retention after drying.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Col
umbi
a U
nive
rsity
] at
05:
55 0
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
BIOMATERIALS WITH POROUS CARRIERS
Figure 8 Relative deteriorotion rote of activity for the moisture with bron (25%)
Figure 9 Relative deterioration rote of octivity for the mixture with rope (25%)
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Col
umbi
a U
nive
rsity
] at
05:
55 0
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
STRUMIUO. ZBICI~~SKI, AND LIU
Figure 10 Rclotive detcr iorot ion r o t e of oct iv i ty for the mix tu re w i t h f lour (25%)
DRYMG OF BAKER'S YEAST BY DEHUMIDIFIED AIR
A set of preliminary experiments on drying of bakefs yeast by dehumidified
air as a drying agent was performed in a fluidized bed dryer. The dehumidified drying
agent allows to increase heat and mass transfer driving force without rising the
temperature. Simultaneously, wet bulb temperature o f the material during the drying
process is smaller than for humid air. This effect may be particularly important for
dlying o f labile materials.
Ambient air was d r i ~ d in a dehumidifier (MUNTERS-600, Germany) to about
1.5% o f relative humidity (with temperature rise to about 35-40 OC). Air leaving the
dehumidifier was heated up to desired temperature in a heater.
As an example o f the results, relative viability and activity degradation as well
as drying kinetics both for "humid" and dehumidified air are shown in figures I I and
12.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Col
umbi
a U
nive
rsity
] at
05:
55 0
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
B I O M A T E W WITH POROUS CARRIERS
Figure 11 Relative viability ond activity degradations
during drying by ombient and dehumidified air
Amblont air: p-34%. T-21.c Oohumidifiod olr: v-1.51. T-3f.c
RVy R*y T -60% h-5.5sm. V-50m /h
Figure 12 Drylng k inet ics of baker ' s y e a s t by a m b i e n t o n d dehurnidl f iad o i r
1.00
0.95
0.00
0.85
0.60 0 5 10 15 20
t
- 1.0
- 0.6 -
- 0.6 -
- 0.4
- 0.2
- o - RVy. amb. oir - - RVy. dohu. 01, . - m y . amb. .ir - - RAY. dahu. air
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Col
umbi
a U
nive
rsity
] at
05:
55 0
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
In every trial the results obtained were encouraging. As a result of a shorter
drying time to the desired final moisture content and a lower temperature of the
material during the process (Figure. 12) better quality retention was observed for dry
air as a drying agent. The most promising results were obtained for low inlet air
temperature. The final quality retention was about 70% which can be compared with
freeze drying quality. However. further studies in this field are necessary.
CONCLUSIONS
I. The most important parameters affecting the activity and viability of baker's
yeast mixed with carriers during thermal drying are temperature of the inlet air, kinds
of a carrier and concentration of a carrier.
2. During the drying of biomaterial with a carrier. a contact-sorption
mechanism of moisture removal occurs. A porous carrier changes the structure of the biomaterial to more porous and develops heat and mass transfer area of the mixture which intensifies moisture removal from the material, decreases the drying time and
improves the final quality.
3. The application of dehumidified air as a drying agent to enhance quality
retention gives encouraging results. Further research in this field is necessary.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The work was carried out as part of the research project No. 1392/3/91
sponsored by the State Cornminee for Scientific Research in the year 1993.
NOTATION
AY activity, mJ k g ' s ' c concentration of a carrier, % f frequency of vibrofluidized bed. Hz F value of F-test. -
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Col
umbi
a U
nive
rsity
] at
05:
55 0
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
BIOMATERIALS WITH POROUS CARRIERS
h static bed height. cm KD deterioration constant. min-I k,, kl. ... k6 constants in equation (2). - Q quality criteria for baket's yeast. - RAY relative activity of bakeh yeast. - RVY relative viability of baket's yeast. - V flowrate of inlet air. m3lh VY viability. % X moisture content, k!&g
Greek symbols rp relative humidity of air. % P type of a carrier. - E bed voidage. %
Subscripts 4 a ~ r air c concentration of a carriel
error frequency of vibrofluidized bed
in inlet m material o initial v flowrate of air P type of a carrier
REFERENCES
1. Kaminski. W., Adamiec, 1.. Grabowski, S., Zbicinski. I.. Strumitlo. C. and Mujumdar. A. S. 1992. Application of Degradation Kinetics to Optimization of Drying Process for Yeast's. Drying of Solids. 1992 h n S. Mujumdar. pp. 250-266.
2. Taeymans, D. and Thursfield. 1. 1988. Fluidized Bed-Drying of immobilized Yeast's. in Drying'87, A. S. Mujumdar, pp. 160-165.
3. Tutova E.G., Strumitlo C., Zbicbiski 1. 1993, Intensification of heat and mass transfer during of labile materials. Drying Working Party Meeting. Utrecht, Holland.
4. Zimmermann. K. and Bauer, W. 1989. Fluidized Bed Drying of Microorganisms on Carrier Material. Proc. 5th Conf. on Engineering and Food. London. Vol. 2. pp. 666-678.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Col
umbi
a U
nive
rsity
] at
05:
55 0
7 O
ctob
er 2
014
5 . Doway. S. and Wearden, S. 1983. Statistics for Research. John Willey and Sons. Inc., New York.
6. Evem. D. H. 1989. Pore System and Their Characteristics. Elsevier Science Publishers 8. V.. Amsterdam. pp. 1-21.
7. Mishkin, M. Saguy. I . and Karel. M. 1984. Optimization of Nutrient Retention During Processing: Ascorbic Acid in Potato Dehydration. Journal of Food Science. Vol. 9. pp. 1262-1270.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Col
umbi
a U
nive
rsity
] at
05:
55 0
7 O
ctob
er 2
014