themis instrument fm2/fm3 perenvironments- 1 teleconference 8/30/2005 themis instrument fm2/3...
TRANSCRIPT
THEMIS Instrument FM2/FM3 PER Environments-1 Teleconference 8/30/2005
THEMISInstrument FM2/3
Pre-Environmental Review Environments
Jeremy McCauley
University of California - Berkeley
THEMIS Instrument FM2/FM3 PER Environments-2 Teleconference 8/30/2005
F2-3 Suite I&T Flow
Suite SC Test12,25JUL2005
Suite Phasing
Test
Inst.Delivery
AXB SPB SST
SuiteThermal
8-14SEP2005
Suite Delivery
• 6 cycles T-V• EFI Functional (Level 1)
Suite PER30AUG2005
INSTRUMENT PERs
INSTRUMENT TESTING
SUITE INTEGRATION
SUITE DELIVERY
IDPU/SUITE ENVIRONMENTS
FGM/SCM
Inst.Thermal
Inst. Vibration
Suite STM
IDPU/ESAVibration
30AUG2005,1SEP2005
IDPU/ESAThermal
2-6SEP2005• 2 cycles T-V• Bake-out +60C
SuiteTest Review
Bus INTMagneticScreening
THEMIS Instrument FM2/FM3 PER Environments-3 Teleconference 8/30/2005
IDPU+ESA Vibe TestingVibration Plan • 3-Axis, Sine and Random to Acceptance Levels• Details contained in THM-ESA-PRC-007, THEMIS ESA + IDPU Acceptance
Vibration Test Procedure , Rev. A (unchanged from F1)
THEMIS Instrument FM2/FM3 PER Environments-4 Teleconference 8/30/2005
Magnetic TestingMagnetic Screening Plan • Box level screening• Deperm with 40Grms, Map with 2 axis rotation of unit within coil system• Details contained in THM-MINT-PROC-121, THEMIS Component Magnetic Test Procedure
THEMIS Instrument FM2/FM3 PER Environments-5 Teleconference 8/30/2005
Thermal Testing Outline
Cycle Accumulation• 2 cycles at instrument level - constrained by schedule• 6 cycles at instrument suite level• 4 cycles at spacecraft level• 12 cycles total for every flight instrument• 4 hour soaks at hot and cold targets• Every TVAC test is preceded by a PER where thermal
engineer signs off on procedure
Thermal Balance• Done on one flight or flight like unit only at the instrument
level• Instrument level balance verifies conductance, absorptance,
and emittance properties• Instrument thermal design is verified at the probe level on
P1
THEMIS Instrument FM2/FM3 PER Environments-6 Teleconference 8/30/2005
TV Plan • 2 Component-Level TV Cycles Prior to Suite Level I&T
• Survival, Cold Start and Bake-out (TQCM Monitor)
• Details contained in THM-ESA-PRC-0016, THEMIS ESA + IDPU Thermal Vacuum Test Procedure, Rev. 2.0 (unchanged from F1)
ESA (TC 5)
Platen #2 (TC 21)
Platen #1 (TC 20) IDPU (TC 10)
IDPU (TC 9)
IDPU/ESA TV Testing
THEMIS Instrument FM2/FM3 PER Environments-7 Teleconference 8/30/2005
ESA/IDPU Thermal Testing Status
• F1 IDPU needs to be retested after rework
THEMIS Instrument FM2/FM3 PER Environments-8 Teleconference 8/30/2005
FGM Thermal Testing Status
• F4 FGS was not conductively mounted correctly in first qualification test. Retest was done in air at limits shown
• No changes since F1 PER
THEMIS Instrument FM2/FM3 PER Environments-9 Teleconference 8/30/2005
SCM Thermal Testing Status
• Thin crack in the potting for two antennas during first ETU test. Potting method reworked and retested
• No changes since F1 PER
THEMIS Instrument FM2/FM3 PER Environments-10 Teleconference 8/30/2005
SCM/FGM Boom Thermal Testing Status
• F1 booms re-named F6 after anomalous vibration results
• F1 SCM and FGM will get a total of 4 cycles at the instrument suite level instead of the normal 8 due to the swap of F1 and F6
• F1/F2 retested twice due to test setup errors
THEMIS Instrument FM2/FM3 PER Environments-11 Teleconference 8/30/2005
SST Thermal Testing Status
• Some ITO coated silver Teflon thermal control tape with 9703 conductive adhesive from the STEREO project was thermal vac tested separately and it passed conductance and adhesion tests
• THEMIS tape was tested after it arrived and it failed. We reworked the application method and retested and the tape passed. Further testing planned.
• F3 renamed F4 and F4 renamed F3• All units need to be retested following mezzanine board rework
THEMIS Instrument FM2/FM3 PER Environments-12 Teleconference 8/30/2005
EFI PreAmp Thermal Testing Status
• ETU 1 Preamp had no problems but FR4 board was switched to Thermount 85 NT for ETU 2 and flight
• Six ETU 2 Qual Units went through 24 cycles, Two of those units added an additional 14 cycles for a total of 38
• Upper limit recently changed from 65 to 90 in September 04 due to receipt of optical testing data on DAG 213.
• No changes since F1 PER
THEMIS Instrument FM2/FM3 PER Environments-13 Teleconference 8/30/2005
EFI PreAmp Thermal Testing Setup
THEMIS Instrument FM2/FM3 PER Environments-14 Teleconference 8/30/2005
EFI SPB Thermal Testing Status
• Qual ETU motor was a motor only stress test, no problems seen• SPB design changed from flying with doors closed to flying with doors open. ETU was
retested after the small modifications this required• Calibration runs done with the sphere keyreels to determine release tension at hot and
cold deployment conditions• SPB unit has completed thermal balance testing• No changes since F1 PER
THEMIS Instrument FM2/FM3 PER Environments-15 Teleconference 8/30/2005
EFI AXB Thermal Testing Status
• Due to delivery schedules to Swales we were unable to include the AXBs in the suite testing. They accumulated the 6 suite cycles on their own
• All testing completed except balance test
THEMIS Instrument FM2/FM3 PER Environments-16 Teleconference 8/30/2005
Suite TV TestingTV Plan • F2 and F3 Suites Together• 6 Suite Level TV Cycles, Survival, Cold Start and Bake-out (TQCM Monitor)• Details contained in THM-SYS-PRC-004, THEMIS INSTRUMENT SUITE
Thermal Vacuum Test Procedure , Rev. B (unchanged from F1)
Suite Thermal Vac Cycle
-75
-55
-35
-15
5
25
45
65
0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88 96 104 112 120 128 136
Hours
Tem
pera
ture
(C)
LPT LPT LPT LPT LPT LPT LPT
SURVIVAL
LPT LPT LPT LPT LPT
LPT LPT
THEMIS Instrument FM2/FM3 PER Environments-17 Teleconference 8/30/2005
Instrument Suite Thermal Testing Status
• Due to an error F1 Suite did not go to the cold survival temperature before turn on. All units have separately been turned on at their cold survival limit.
• F2-F5 will be tested to the –60 survival temperature