the van deemter indoctrination

111
THE VAN DEEMTER INDOCTRINATION Nitrogen as Carrier Gas for GC? Are you kidding! www.is-x.be

Upload: joeri-vercammen

Post on 19-Jun-2015

3.884 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Nitrogen cannot be used as carrier gas for GC. How sure are you about that? In this presentation we tackle what we call the “van Deemter indoctrination”. Take a look at our recent accomplishments and convince yourself to give it at try. Particularly now when more and more laboratories are suffering from inconsistent supplies of helium.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The van Deemter Indoctrination

THE VAN DEEMTER INDOCTRINATION

Nitrogen as Carrier Gas for GC?Are you kidding!

www.is-x.be

Page 2: The van Deemter Indoctrination

This is a funny story…

Page 3: The van Deemter Indoctrination

This is a funny story…about carrier gases in GC…

Page 4: The van Deemter Indoctrination

This is a funny story…about carrier gases in GC…and how we all got fooled.

Page 5: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Are you ready?

Page 6: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Keep Keep Keep Keep staringstaringstaringstaring in the centerin the centerin the centerin the center

Page 7: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Keep Keep Keep Keep staringstaringstaringstaring in the centerin the centerin the centerin the center

Page 8: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Keep Keep Keep Keep staringstaringstaringstaring in the centerin the centerin the centerin the center

Page 9: The van Deemter Indoctrination

YouYouYouYou are are are are sufferingsufferingsufferingsuffering fromfromfromfrominconsistent helium inconsistent helium inconsistent helium inconsistent helium supplysupplysupplysupply

Page 10: The van Deemter Indoctrination

YouYouYouYou have have have have problemsproblemsproblemsproblemsimplementingimplementingimplementingimplementing hydrogenhydrogenhydrogenhydrogen

Page 11: The van Deemter Indoctrination

ThereThereThereThere is is is is NO ALTERNATIVENO ALTERNATIVENO ALTERNATIVENO ALTERNATIVE

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Page 12: The van Deemter Indoctrination

We all know this story, don’t we?

Page 13: The van Deemter Indoctrination

However…

Page 14: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Have you ever considerednitrogen?

Page 15: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Probably not…

Page 16: The van Deemter Indoctrination

That’s because we all suffer fromthe “van Deemter indoctrination”

3Don’t worry, I’ve been a victim myself too…

Page 17: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Take a look at our experiencesand try to cure yourself too!

Page 18: The van Deemter Indoctrination

J. J. van Deemter was a briljant Dutch physicist. He worked for the Royal Dutch Shell laboratoryIn Amsterdam (The Netherlands) in the 1950s.

He was employed as chemical engineer and onlyhad little direct interest in chromatography.

Page 19: The van Deemter Indoctrination

In those days, the mathematical description ofthe chromatography process was rather complex.

Page 20: The van Deemter Indoctrination

In those days, the mathematical description ofthe chromatography process was rather complex.

This was mainly due to improper modelling.

Page 21: The van Deemter Indoctrination

van van van van DeemterDeemterDeemterDeemter J. J., J. J., J. J., J. J., ZuiderwegZuiderwegZuiderwegZuiderweg F. J. & F. J. & F. J. & F. J. & KlinkenbergKlinkenbergKlinkenbergKlinkenberg A. A. A. A. “Longitudinal diffusion and resistance to mass transfer as causes of nonideality in chromatography.”

Chem. Eng. Sci. 5:271-89, 1956.

However, after much experimentation and plotting, a very simple equation could be derived.

Page 22: The van Deemter Indoctrination

This equation, which is known as the van Deemterequation, was the first to describe the chromato-graphic process correctly.

Page 23: The van Deemter Indoctrination

H = A + B/u + CuH = height of one theoretical plate, cmu = average linear velocity, cm/s

Page 24: The van Deemter Indoctrination

In order to work under optimal conditions, plate height H has to be minimal.

H = A + B/u + Cu

Page 25: The van Deemter Indoctrination

THE A TERM = EDDY DIFFUSION

Peak broadening due to path lenghts differences in packedGC columns. A = 0 for capillary columns.

Page 26: The van Deemter Indoctrination

THE A TERM = EDDY DIFFUSION

Peak broadening due to path lenghts differences in packedGC columns. A = 0 for capillary columns.

Page 27: The van Deemter Indoctrination

THE A TERM = EDDY DIFFUSION

Peak broadening due to path lenghts differences in packedGC columns. A = 0 for capillary columns.

Page 28: The van Deemter Indoctrination

THE A TERM = EDDY DIFFUSION

Peak broadening due to path lenghts differences in packedGC columns. A = 0 for capillary columns.

Page 29: The van Deemter Indoctrination

THE A TERM = EDDY DIFFUSION

Peak broadening due to path lenghts differences in packedGC columns. A = 0 for capillary columns.

Page 30: The van Deemter Indoctrination

THE B TERM = LONGITUDINAL DIFFUSION

Peak broadening due to multidirectional diffusion. Indirectly proportional to flowrate.

Page 31: The van Deemter Indoctrination

THE B TERM = LONGITUDINAL DIFFUSION

Peak broadening due to multidirectional diffusion. Indirectly proportional to flowrate.

Page 32: The van Deemter Indoctrination

THE B TERM = LONGITUDINAL DIFFUSION

Peak broadening due to multidirectional diffusion. Indirectly proportional to flowrate.

Page 33: The van Deemter Indoctrination

THE B TERM = LONGITUDINAL DIFFUSION

Peak broadening due to multidirectional diffusion. Indirectly proportional to flowrate.

Page 34: The van Deemter Indoctrination

THE C TERM = RESISTANCE TO MASS TRANSFER

Peak broadening due to equilibrium kinetics in mobile andstationary phase. DirectlyDirectlyDirectlyDirectly proportionalproportionalproportionalproportional totototo flowrateflowrateflowrateflowrate!!!!

Stationary phase

Page 35: The van Deemter Indoctrination

THE C TERM = RESISTANCE TO MASS TRANSFER

Peak broadening due to equilibrium kinetics in mobile andstationary phase. DirectlyDirectlyDirectlyDirectly proportionalproportionalproportionalproportional totototo flowrateflowrateflowrateflowrate!!!!

Stationary phase

Page 36: The van Deemter Indoctrination

THE C TERM = RESISTANCE TO MASS TRANSFER

Peak broadening due to equilibrium kinetics in mobile andstationary phase. DirectlyDirectlyDirectlyDirectly proportionalproportionalproportionalproportional totototo flowrateflowrateflowrateflowrate!!!!

Stationary phase

Page 37: The van Deemter Indoctrination

THE C TERM = RESISTANCE TO MASS TRANSFER

Peak broadening due to equilibrium kinetics in mobile andstationary phase. DirectlyDirectlyDirectlyDirectly proportionalproportionalproportionalproportional totototo flowrateflowrateflowrateflowrate!!!!

Stationary phase

Page 38: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Both B and C terms react opposite to flowratechanges.

Page 39: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Both B and C terms react opposite to flowratechanges.

There is an optimal flow!

Page 40: The van Deemter Indoctrination

This is how a typical van Deemter curve looks like.

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5

H, cm

Flow rate, mL/min

Page 41: The van Deemter Indoctrination

And this is the optimal flow region.

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5

H, cm

Flow rate, mL/min

Optimal flow region

Page 42: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Key variables that determine curve shape and optimalflow region are column ID and carrier gas type.

Page 43: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Key variables that determine curve shape and optimalflow region are column ID and carrier gas type.

Page 44: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Key variables that determine curve shape and optimalflow region are column ID and carrier gas type.

Page 45: The van Deemter Indoctrination

0,0

0,5

1,0

1,5

2,0

2,5

3,0

0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5

H, cm

Flow rate, mL/min

Nitrogen

Helium

Hydrogen

Influence of carrier gas type.

Page 46: The van Deemter Indoctrination

0,0

0,5

1,0

1,5

2,0

2,5

3,0

0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5

H, cm

Flow rate, mL/min

Test compound: 2-ethyl hexanoic acid

Column: 20 m x 0.18 mm I.D. x 0.18 µm df

Phase: Rxi-5 Sil MS

Manufacturer: Restek (# 43602)

Nitrogen

Helium

Hydrogen

Experimental details.

Page 47: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Van Deemter tells us: “helium is acceptable”.

Page 48: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Van Deemter tells us: “helium is acceptable”.

We advise to use helium for all MS applications,but do we really need it for GC/FID work ?

Page 49: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Van Deemter tells us: “hydrogen is best”.

Page 50: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Van Deemter tells us: “hydrogen is best”.

We advise to use hydrogen for fast(er) GC applications. In combination with MS you have tocope with a loss in sensitivity and a risk of activity.

Page 51: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Approach when keeping the same column:

Page 52: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Approach when keeping the same column:

Divide the isothermal stages of your oven program by two and double all the programming rates (headpressure stays the same).

Page 53: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Approach when keeping the same column:

Divide the isothermal stages of your oven program by two and double all the programming rates (headpressure stays the same).

Thus:

30C (2 min) to 250C at 10C/min (Helium)=

30C (1 min) to 250C at 20C/min (Hydrogen)

Page 54: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Example 1: Solvent impurity analysis.

Page 55: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Example 1: Solvent impurity analysis.

Minutes

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34

pA

-10000

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

110000

120000

pA

-10000

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

110000

120000

TRACE GC-FID A

Unknown

Helium: 30 minutesColumn: 20 m x 0.18 mm I.D.

Page 56: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Example 1: Solvent impurity analysis.

Minutes

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34

pA

-10000

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

110000

120000

pA

-10000

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

110000

120000

TRACE GC-FID A

Unknown

Minutes

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

pA

-10000

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

110000

120000

130000

140000

150000

160000

pA

-10000

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

110000

120000

130000

140000

150000

160000TRACE GC-FID A

Unknown

Helium: 30 minutesColumn: 20 m x 0.18 mm I.D.

Hydrogen: 15 minutesColumn: 20 m x 0.18 mm I.D.

Page 57: The van Deemter Indoctrination

A little bit more in detail.

Page 58: The van Deemter Indoctrination

A little bit more in detail.

Minutes

12 14 16

Helium

Page 59: The van Deemter Indoctrination

A little bit more in detail.

Minutes

12 14 16 6 7 8

Helium Hydrogen

Page 60: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Example 2: Process analysis.

Page 61: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Example 2: Process analysis.

min0 2 4 6 8 10 12

pA

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

6

6.5

7

FID1 A, (1603JV04.D)

0.898

FID2 B, (1603JV04.D)

Page 62: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Example 2: Process analysis.

min0 2 4 6 8 10 12

pA

3.5

4

4.5

5

5.5

6

6.5

7

FID1 A, (1603JV04.D)

0.898

FID2 B, (1603JV04.D)

Helium: 44 minutesHydrogen: 14 minutes!MXT column: 10 m x 0.53 mm I.D.

Page 63: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Example 3: Environmental analysis

Page 64: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Example 3: Environmental analysis

Minutes

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0

pA

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

17.5

20.0

22.5

25.0

27.5

30.0

32.5

35.0

37.5

40.0

42.5

pA

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

17.5

20.0

22.5

25.0

27.5

30.0

32.5

35.0

37.5

40.0

42.5

TRACE GC-FID-ar

SV MegaMix

Page 65: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Example 3: Environmental analysis

Minutes

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0

pA

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

17.5

20.0

22.5

25.0

27.5

30.0

32.5

35.0

37.5

40.0

42.5

pA

7.5

10.0

12.5

15.0

17.5

20.0

22.5

25.0

27.5

30.0

32.5

35.0

37.5

40.0

42.5

TRACE GC-FID-ar

SV MegaMix

Helium: 25 minutesColumn: 20 m x 0.18 mm I.D.

Hydrogen: 6 minutes!Column: 10 m x 0.10 mm I.D.

Page 66: The van Deemter Indoctrination

But beware,

Page 67: The van Deemter Indoctrination

But beware,

It’s a struggle to convice company safety officers.

Page 68: The van Deemter Indoctrination

But beware,

It’s a struggle to convice company safety officers.You need to invest in sensors.

Page 69: The van Deemter Indoctrination

But beware,

It’s a struggle to convice company safety officers.You need to invest in sensors.You need to invest in generators.

Page 70: The van Deemter Indoctrination

But beware,

It’s a struggle to convice company safety officers.You need to invest in sensors.You need to invest in generators.

And sometimes it simply does not work!

Page 71: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Example 1: Loss in capacity.

Minutes

3,2 3,3 3,4 3,5 3,6 3,7 3,8 3,9 4,0 4,1 4,2

pA

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

pA

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

3,380

3,443

3,588

3,682

3,797

4,000

TRACE GC-FID-AR

cumeen

5-10-2009 13-35-40 CP5CB H2 cumeen.dat

Retention Time

Name

TRACE GC-FID-AR

cumeen

24-09-2009 10-11-54 CC656 H2 cumeen.dat

TRACE GC-FID-AR

cumeen

29-09-2009 12-36-21 CC657 H2 cumeen.dat

Reference:0.32 mm ID, 1.2 µm df (H2)

0.15 mm ID, 0.6 µm df (H2)

0.15 mm ID,1.2 µm df (H2)

Page 72: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Example 2: Impurities in styrene.

Styrene Ethylbenzene

Page 73: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Example 2: Impurities in styrene.

Styrene Ethylbenzene

Page 74: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Results overview.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

150170190210230250

Conc, ppm

Injection temp, C

Ethylbenzene (He) Ethylbenzene (H2) Indane (He) Indane (H2)

Page 75: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Results overview.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

150170190210230250

Conc, ppm

Injection temp, C

Ethylbenzene (He) Ethylbenzene (H2) Indane (He) Indane (H2)

Internal standard

Page 76: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Results overview.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

150170190210230250

Conc, ppm

Injection temp, C

Ethylbenzene (He) Ethylbenzene (H2) Indane (He) Indane (H2)

Ethylbenzene

Page 77: The van Deemter Indoctrination

And finally…

Page 78: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Last but not least…

Page 79: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Nitrogen…

Page 80: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Van Deemter tells us: “nitrogen cannot be used”.

Page 81: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Is this where it ends?

Van Deemter tells us: “nitrogen cannot be used”.

Page 82: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Is this where it ends?

Van Deemter tells us: “nitrogen cannot be used”.

Page 83: The van Deemter Indoctrination

We have implemented several nitrogen methodssuccessfully the last year.

Page 84: The van Deemter Indoctrination

We have implemented several nitrogen methodssuccessfully the last year.

We primarely aim at GC/FID methods.

Page 85: The van Deemter Indoctrination

We have implemented several nitrogen methodssuccessfully the last year.

We primarely aim at GC/FID methods.

Page 86: The van Deemter Indoctrination

We have implemented several nitrogen methodssuccessfully the last year.

We primarely aim at GC/FID methods.

7/10 instruments!

Page 87: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Approach when keeping the same column:

Page 88: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Approach when keeping the same column:

Just leave everything as it is (including head pressure)!

Page 89: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Approach when keeping the same column:

Just leave everything as it is (including head pressure)!

Thus:

30C (2 min) to 250C at 10C/min (Helium)=

30C (2 min) to 250C at 10C/min (Nitrogen)

Page 90: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Example 1: Test mix.

Page 91: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Example 1: Test mix.

2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40 3.60 3.80 4.00 4.20 4.40 4.60 4.80 5.00

9.00

10.00

11.00

12.00

13.00

14.00

15.00

8 - 2.8159 - 2.867

10 - 3.263

11 - 4.06312 - 4.147

13 - 4.505

14 - 4.785

15 - 4.827

16 - 4.873

min

pA

Carrier N2 1.5 mL #3 XIL-350_Mix He Front_FID2

HeliumColumn: 20 m x 0.18 mm I.D.

Page 92: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Example 1: Test mix.

2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40 3.60 3.80 4.00 4.20 4.40 4.60 4.80 5.00

9.00

10.00

11.00

12.00

13.00

14.00

15.00

8 - 2.8159 - 2.867

10 - 3.263

11 - 4.06312 - 4.147

13 - 4.505

14 - 4.785

15 - 4.827

16 - 4.873

min

pA

Carrier N2 1.5 mL #3 XIL-350_Mix He Front_FID2

2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40 3.60 3.80 4.00 4.20 4.40 4.60 4.80 5.00

9.00

10.00

11.00

12.00

13.00

14.00

15.00

8 - 2.8159 - 2.867

10 - 3.263

11 - 4.06312 - 4.147

13 - 4.505

14 - 4.785

15 - 4.827

16 - 4.873

min

pA

Carrier N2 1.5 mL #3 XIL-350_Mix He Front_FID2

HeliumColumn: 20 m x 0.18 mm I.D.

NitrogenColumn: 20 m x 0.18 mm I.D.

Page 93: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Example 2: Butyl acrylate.

Page 94: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Example 2: Butyl acrylate.

HeliumColumn: 60 m x 0.32 mm I.D.

Page 95: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Example 2: Butyl acrylate.

HeliumColumn: 60 m x 0.32 mm I.D.

NitrogenColumn: 60 m x 0.32 mm I.D.

Page 96: The van Deemter Indoctrination

A little bit more in detail.

Page 97: The van Deemter Indoctrination

A little bit more in detail.

Helium

Page 98: The van Deemter Indoctrination

A little bit more in detail.

Helium Nitrogen

Page 99: The van Deemter Indoctrination

A little bit more in detail.

Helium Nitrogen

Page 100: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Example 3: Narrow bore column

Page 101: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Example 3: Narrow bore column

2.00 min2.00 min2.00 min2.00 min

NitrogenColumn: 10 m x 0.1 mm I.D.

Page 102: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Why does it work?

Page 103: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Why does it work?

Van Deemter is measured under isothermal conditions

Page 104: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Why does it work?

Van Deemter is measured under isothermal conditionsVan Deemter is valid for optimal conditions

Page 105: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Why does it work?

Van Deemter is measured under isothermal conditionsVan Deemter is valid for optimal conditions

Page 106: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Why does it work?

Van Deemter is measured under isothermal conditionsVan Deemter is valid for optimal conditions

InjectionSeptum

LinerColumn

Page 107: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Why does it work?

Van Deemter is measured under isothermal conditionsVan Deemter is valid for optimal conditions

InjectionSeptum

LinerColumn

Page 108: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Other methods:

AcrylatesDi- and triaminesBTEXNon-aromaticsPrimary aryl alcoholsEthylacetateEthanolaminesAlcoholsAcetic acidLight hydrocarbons

Page 109: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Don’t be afraid to challengevan Deemter!

Page 110: The van Deemter Indoctrination

More information?

Dr. Joeri VercammenDr. Joeri VercammenDr. Joeri VercammenDr. Joeri VercammenManaging Expert ISManaging Expert ISManaging Expert ISManaging Expert IS----XXXX

[email protected]://www.linkedin.com/in/joerivercammen

Also check out our other presentations!

Page 111: The van Deemter Indoctrination

Acknowledgements:

C. De WeerdtE. Van BrusselA. De CaluwéR. HeusP. RyckaertM. Van Lancker