the use of ecosystem visualisation to identify value flows at abb in the context of the internet of...

17
The use of ecosystem visualisation to identify value flows in the context of the internet of things, services and people (IoTSP) Aston Spring Servitization Conference, May 2016 Michelle Künzli, Dr Shaun West, Dr Zied Ouertani, Dr Christopher Ganz

Upload: shaun-west

Post on 22-Jan-2018

297 views

Category:

Business


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

The  use  of  ecosystem  visualisation  to  identify  value  flows  in  the  context  of  the  internet  of  things,  services  and  people  (IoTSP)

Aston  Spring  Servitization  Conference,  May  2016

Michelle  Künzli,  Dr  Shaun  West,  Dr  Zied Ouertani,  Dr  Christopher  Ganz

Künzli,  West,  Ouertani &  Ganz,  2016

IntroductionThe  problem  and  the  purpose  of  this  paper

…to  describe   an  approach  that  links  both  the  product  and  the  service  development

In  the  IoTSP the  relationship  and  value  exchange  between  actors  can  be  difficult  to  identify  and  understand…to  describe   the  process  used  to  discover  the  interrelationships  

between  actors  in  the  ecosystem

Purpose  of  this  paper

…  to  describe   the  process  of  ecosystem  discovery  for  manufacturing  firms  to  understand  the  ‘spaghetti’  of  transactions…

Problem

Künzli,  West,  Ouertani &  Ganz,  2016

IntroductionIntroducing  the  IOT  and  ecosystems

Internet  of  Things-­‐ The   IoT enables   more  complex   services-­‐ Willingness   to  share  data   is  critical   for  the   IoT

Ecosystem-­‐ There   are  many   interdependencies   in  an  ecosystem-­‐ Some   interests   contrast  each   other

The  IoT requires  more  collaboration  and  co-­‐creation,  breaking    linear  supply  chains

Value  is  not  inherent  in  the  product  or  service  – it  is  measured  with  what  people  are  willing  to  give  in  return

Künzli,  West,  Ouertani &  Ganz,  2016

MethodologyFour  steps  were  used  to  understand  the  ecosystem  and  value  exchanges

The  objective  was  to  create  a  simple  process  that  could  be  used  within  the  firm

Künzli,  West,  Ouertani &  Ganz,  2016

Analysis  of  the  ecosystem  mappingIdentification  of  the  roles  in  the  ecosystem

Process-­‐ The  different   actors  were   identified   and  placed   on  the  ecosystem

-­‐ Several   iterations   were   needed

Lessons-­‐ The  process   takes   time  -­‐ Input  from  different   sources   is  critical

Identification  of  the  roles  was  not  a  simple  process  and  required  iterations

Core Company

Community

Custo

mer

Supp

lier

Business Ecosystem

Extended Business

Core Business

Projects/ Systems

Channel 2

Products

Unions

Sub-Supplier B

Supplier B

CompetitorsRegulators

Customer-Partner C

Customer-Partner B

Customer-Partner A

Customer D

Customer C

Customer A

Customer B

Services

Channel 3

Consultant

Sub-Supplier C

Sub-Supplier A

Channel 1

Supplier A

Künzli,  West,  Ouertani &  Ganz,  2016

Analysis  of  the  empathy  map  for  each  actor  in  the  ecosystemThis  process  identifies  the  motivation  for  each  actor  in  the  ecosystem

Process-­‐ Helps   understand   ’irrational’   behaviour-­‐ Takes  a  long   time   for  each   actor-­‐ 2-­‐3  iterations   are   required

Lessons-­‐ Provided   rich  discussions   within  ABB-­‐ Valuable   new   insights   gained-­‐ Tangibles   and  intangibles   identified-­‐ Emotional   issues  often  had  a  rational   basis

New  insights  into  each   actor  were  identified  using  the  empathy  map

My job is the most important

and I can show it by hitting the

firms key metrics

Likes an easy job Does not like it

when the

unexpected happens

Says: wants the cheapest

Does: always buys from the OEM

Pains• Fuel consumption• On time arrival• Equipment maintenance

Gains• More automated work• Focus on other tasks • Peace of mind

Künzli,  West,  Ouertani &  Ganz,  2016

Analysis  of  the  ecosystem  mappingIdentification  of  the  relationships  within  the  ecosystem

Process-­‐ Value  exchanges   were  segmented   into   four  layers-­‐ Each   layer   was  given  a  different   colour

Lessons-­‐ The  ecosystem   now  resembles   spaghetti-­‐ Layering   provides   more  details-­‐ The  conventional   value   chain   is  no  longer   valid-­‐ A  time   ’layer’   should  be   investigated

How  can  the  spaghetti  be  made  useful  for  business  decisions?

Core Company

Community

Custo

mer

Supp

lier

Business Ecosystem

Extended Business

Core Business

Projects/ Systems

Channel 2

Products

Unions

Sub-Supplier B

Supplier B

CompetitorsRegulators

Customer-Partner C

Customer-Partner B

Customer-Partner A

Customer D

Customer C

Customer A

Customer B

Services

Channel 3

Consultant

Sub-Supplier C

Sub-Supplier A

Channel 1

Supplier A

ServicesMonetaryInformation

Goods

Künzli,  West,  Ouertani &  Ganz,  2016

Analysis  of  the  ecosystem  maps  with  visual  layersApplying  layers  gives  different  views  of  the  exchanges  within  the  ecosystem

Core Company

Community

Custo

mer

Supp

lier

Business Ecosystem

Extended Business

Core Business

Projects/ Systems

Channel 2

Products

Unions

Sub-Supplier B

Supplier B

CompetitorsRegulators

Customer-Partner C

Customer-Partner B

Customer-Partner A

Customer D

Customer C

Customer A

Customer B

Services

Channel 3

Consultant

Sub-Supplier C

Sub-Supplier A

Channel 1

Supplier A

Goods

Core Company

Community

Custo

mer

Supp

lier

Business Ecosystem

Extended Business

Core Business

Projects/ Systems

Channel 2

Products

Unions

Sub-Supplier B

Supplier B

CompetitorsRegulators

Customer-Partner C

Customer-Partner B

Customer-Partner A

Customer D

Customer C

Customer A

Customer B

Services

Channel 3

Consultant

Sub-Supplier C

Sub-Supplier A

Channel 1

Supplier A

Monetary

The  supplier/customer  relationships  between  actors  are  now  much  clearer

Künzli,  West,  Ouertani &  Ganz,  2016

Analysis  of  the  ecosystem  maps  with  visual  layers  Applying  layers  gives  different  views  of  the  exchanges  within  the  ecosystem

The  supplier/customer  relationships  between  actors  are  now  much  clearer

Core Company

Community

Custo

mer

Supp

lier

Business Ecosystem

Extended Business

Core Business

Projects/ Systems

Channel 2

Products

Unions

Sub-Supplier B

Supplier B

CompetitorsRegulators

Customer-Partner C

Customer-Partner B

Customer-Partner A

Customer D

Customer C

Customer A

Customer B

Services

Channel 3

Consultant

Sub-Supplier C

Sub-Supplier A

Channel 1

Supplier A

Information

Core Company

Community

Custo

mer

Supp

lier

Business Ecosystem

Extended Business

Core Business

Projects/ Systems

Channel 2

Products

Unions

Sub-Supplier B

Supplier B

CompetitorsRegulators

Customer-Partner C

Customer-Partner B

Customer-Partner A

Customer D

Customer C

Customer A

Customer B

Services

Channel 3

Consultant

Sub-Supplier C

Sub-Supplier A

Channel 1

Supplier A

Services

Künzli,  West,  Ouertani &  Ganz,  2016

Analysis  of  value  propositions  within  the  ecosystemThe  focus  was  on  the  customer  side  of  the  value  proposition

Process-­‐ ’Job-­‐to-­‐be-­‐done’   for  each   actor  was  identified-­‐ Pains  and  gains  were   taken   from  the  empathy  maps-­‐ The  data  was  tabulated

Lessons-­‐ The   IoTSP drives   towards   intangible   aspects-­‐ IoTSP solutions   often  created   new  risks-­‐ It  was  simpler   to  identify   customer   value  propositions   that   supported   customer   outcomes

The  focus  was  on  the  customer  side  as  this  is  the  ’problem’  definition

Künzli,  West,  Ouertani &  Ganz,  2016

Analysis  of  value  propositions  within  the  ecosystemPartial  example  of  customer  job,  pains  and  gains

Role Customer  Job Pains Gains

Channel  A Offer  equipment  from  different  suppliers  (can  be  part  of  initial  sale);  own  the  equipment;  sometimes  selling  it  in  own  name;  storing  it  at  focal  company;  offer  general  services

Stock  of  unsuccessful   equipment;  too  much  storage  cost;  changes  in  regulations  or  integrity

Easy  implementation  in  further  developed  equipment;  equipment  needs  many  spare  parts

Channel  B Offer  end-­‐product/  plant  with  products  from  different  suppliers;  do  the  different  parts  function  together?

Reliability;  products  from  different  suppliers  need  to  be  able  to  be  combined;  time  and  budget;  parts  do  not  function  together

Collaboration  between  suppliers  to  co-­‐create;  easy  installation

Channel  C Uses  products  and  further  develops  them;  offers  equipment

Products  change Better  performance  but  same  dimensions

This  provided  a  detailed  understanding  of  what  was  important  for  each  actor

Künzli,  West,  Ouertani &  Ganz,  2016

Analysis  of  co-­‐creation  and  co-­‐deliveryDifferent  levels  of  involvement  collaboration  are  possible

-­‐ Co-­‐creation   and  co-­‐delivery   was   important-­‐ Not  all  actors  have  all   the  answers-­‐ Not  all   the  actors  have  all   the   tools

-­‐ The  amount  of  OEM involvement   can  change-­‐ Over   time  -­‐ With  particular   situations

The  OEM  should  not  assume  that  they  have  all  the  solutions

Do It Yourself

Do It For MeDo It With Me

Künzli,  West,  Ouertani &  Ganz,  2016

Analysis  of  single-­‐sided   relationships  Why  is  it  important  to  identify  and  understand  single-­‐sided  relationships?

-­‐ ’Give-­‐and-­‐take‘   supports  a  balanced   relationship-­‐ Imbalances   can   lead   to  mistrust-­‐ There   are  many   forms  of  value  exchange-­‐ Exchanges   may  be  separated   by  time  

Sustainability  of  relationships  becomes  a  risk  in  single-­‐sided  relationships

Core Company

Community

Custo

mer

Supp

lier

Business Ecosystem

Extended Business

Core Business

Suppliers

Customer

Services

Services IoTSPServicesGoods

MonetaryInformation IoTSPInformation IoTSP

Künzli,  West,  Ouertani &  Ganz,  2016

Analysis  of  data  over  timeInformation  is  not  just  data  and  over  time  brings  knowledge  and  wisdom

-­‐ Data  alone   is  not  valuable-­‐ Information   allows   for  management   action-­‐ How  to  move   from  date   to  wisdom  when  data   is  fragmented-­‐ Lost  of  data  may  mean   lost   future  opportunities-­‐ Long-­‐term   cooperation   is  required   between   the  actors

Do  not  lose  your  data;  it  may  have  value  in  the  future

Künzli,  West,  Ouertani &  Ganz,  2016

ConclusionsThere  are  a  large  number  of  stakeholders  with  significantly  different  value  propositions

The  customer  value  proposition  plays  a  central  role

Customer  as  a  key  partner  and  their  role  may  change  over  time  

Co-­‐creation  and  co-­‐delivery  are  critical  within  the  IoTSP

The  identification  of  the  ecosystem,  the  actors  and  what  they  value  is  not  a  trivial  task  to  undertake  

Single-­‐sided  value  exchange  may  not  be  sustainable  

Künzli,  West,  Ouertani &  Ganz,  2016

RecommendationsFurther  research  and  application  of  the  process  should  be  undertaken

A  process  to  describe  the  ecosystems  simply  should  be  developed  

Use  of  the  customer  as  a  key  partner  needs  further  research  

The  timing  implications  of  value  exchange  should  be  investigated

The  process  is  being  operationalised  by  ABB  so  that  they  are  able  to  better  use  the  ecosystem  to  support  their  customers

Important  to  identify  and  managing  single-­‐sided  value  exchange

Künzli,  West,  Ouertani &  Ganz,  2016

Thanks  for  your  time!Questions  over  coffee…