the use of ecosystem visualisation to identify value flows at abb in the context of the internet of...
TRANSCRIPT
The use of ecosystem visualisation to identify value flows in the context of the internet of things, services and people (IoTSP)
Aston Spring Servitization Conference, May 2016
Michelle Künzli, Dr Shaun West, Dr Zied Ouertani, Dr Christopher Ganz
Künzli, West, Ouertani & Ganz, 2016
IntroductionThe problem and the purpose of this paper
…to describe an approach that links both the product and the service development
In the IoTSP the relationship and value exchange between actors can be difficult to identify and understand…to describe the process used to discover the interrelationships
between actors in the ecosystem
Purpose of this paper
… to describe the process of ecosystem discovery for manufacturing firms to understand the ‘spaghetti’ of transactions…
Problem
Künzli, West, Ouertani & Ganz, 2016
IntroductionIntroducing the IOT and ecosystems
Internet of Things-‐ The IoT enables more complex services-‐ Willingness to share data is critical for the IoT
Ecosystem-‐ There are many interdependencies in an ecosystem-‐ Some interests contrast each other
The IoT requires more collaboration and co-‐creation, breaking linear supply chains
Value is not inherent in the product or service – it is measured with what people are willing to give in return
Künzli, West, Ouertani & Ganz, 2016
MethodologyFour steps were used to understand the ecosystem and value exchanges
The objective was to create a simple process that could be used within the firm
Künzli, West, Ouertani & Ganz, 2016
Analysis of the ecosystem mappingIdentification of the roles in the ecosystem
Process-‐ The different actors were identified and placed on the ecosystem
-‐ Several iterations were needed
Lessons-‐ The process takes time -‐ Input from different sources is critical
Identification of the roles was not a simple process and required iterations
Core Company
Community
Custo
mer
Supp
lier
Business Ecosystem
Extended Business
Core Business
Projects/ Systems
Channel 2
Products
Unions
Sub-Supplier B
Supplier B
CompetitorsRegulators
Customer-Partner C
Customer-Partner B
Customer-Partner A
Customer D
Customer C
Customer A
Customer B
Services
Channel 3
Consultant
Sub-Supplier C
Sub-Supplier A
Channel 1
Supplier A
Künzli, West, Ouertani & Ganz, 2016
Analysis of the empathy map for each actor in the ecosystemThis process identifies the motivation for each actor in the ecosystem
Process-‐ Helps understand ’irrational’ behaviour-‐ Takes a long time for each actor-‐ 2-‐3 iterations are required
Lessons-‐ Provided rich discussions within ABB-‐ Valuable new insights gained-‐ Tangibles and intangibles identified-‐ Emotional issues often had a rational basis
New insights into each actor were identified using the empathy map
My job is the most important
and I can show it by hitting the
firms key metrics
Likes an easy job Does not like it
when the
unexpected happens
Says: wants the cheapest
Does: always buys from the OEM
Pains• Fuel consumption• On time arrival• Equipment maintenance
Gains• More automated work• Focus on other tasks • Peace of mind
Künzli, West, Ouertani & Ganz, 2016
Analysis of the ecosystem mappingIdentification of the relationships within the ecosystem
Process-‐ Value exchanges were segmented into four layers-‐ Each layer was given a different colour
Lessons-‐ The ecosystem now resembles spaghetti-‐ Layering provides more details-‐ The conventional value chain is no longer valid-‐ A time ’layer’ should be investigated
How can the spaghetti be made useful for business decisions?
Core Company
Community
Custo
mer
Supp
lier
Business Ecosystem
Extended Business
Core Business
Projects/ Systems
Channel 2
Products
Unions
Sub-Supplier B
Supplier B
CompetitorsRegulators
Customer-Partner C
Customer-Partner B
Customer-Partner A
Customer D
Customer C
Customer A
Customer B
Services
Channel 3
Consultant
Sub-Supplier C
Sub-Supplier A
Channel 1
Supplier A
ServicesMonetaryInformation
Goods
Künzli, West, Ouertani & Ganz, 2016
Analysis of the ecosystem maps with visual layersApplying layers gives different views of the exchanges within the ecosystem
Core Company
Community
Custo
mer
Supp
lier
Business Ecosystem
Extended Business
Core Business
Projects/ Systems
Channel 2
Products
Unions
Sub-Supplier B
Supplier B
CompetitorsRegulators
Customer-Partner C
Customer-Partner B
Customer-Partner A
Customer D
Customer C
Customer A
Customer B
Services
Channel 3
Consultant
Sub-Supplier C
Sub-Supplier A
Channel 1
Supplier A
Goods
Core Company
Community
Custo
mer
Supp
lier
Business Ecosystem
Extended Business
Core Business
Projects/ Systems
Channel 2
Products
Unions
Sub-Supplier B
Supplier B
CompetitorsRegulators
Customer-Partner C
Customer-Partner B
Customer-Partner A
Customer D
Customer C
Customer A
Customer B
Services
Channel 3
Consultant
Sub-Supplier C
Sub-Supplier A
Channel 1
Supplier A
Monetary
The supplier/customer relationships between actors are now much clearer
Künzli, West, Ouertani & Ganz, 2016
Analysis of the ecosystem maps with visual layers Applying layers gives different views of the exchanges within the ecosystem
The supplier/customer relationships between actors are now much clearer
Core Company
Community
Custo
mer
Supp
lier
Business Ecosystem
Extended Business
Core Business
Projects/ Systems
Channel 2
Products
Unions
Sub-Supplier B
Supplier B
CompetitorsRegulators
Customer-Partner C
Customer-Partner B
Customer-Partner A
Customer D
Customer C
Customer A
Customer B
Services
Channel 3
Consultant
Sub-Supplier C
Sub-Supplier A
Channel 1
Supplier A
Information
Core Company
Community
Custo
mer
Supp
lier
Business Ecosystem
Extended Business
Core Business
Projects/ Systems
Channel 2
Products
Unions
Sub-Supplier B
Supplier B
CompetitorsRegulators
Customer-Partner C
Customer-Partner B
Customer-Partner A
Customer D
Customer C
Customer A
Customer B
Services
Channel 3
Consultant
Sub-Supplier C
Sub-Supplier A
Channel 1
Supplier A
Services
Künzli, West, Ouertani & Ganz, 2016
Analysis of value propositions within the ecosystemThe focus was on the customer side of the value proposition
Process-‐ ’Job-‐to-‐be-‐done’ for each actor was identified-‐ Pains and gains were taken from the empathy maps-‐ The data was tabulated
Lessons-‐ The IoTSP drives towards intangible aspects-‐ IoTSP solutions often created new risks-‐ It was simpler to identify customer value propositions that supported customer outcomes
The focus was on the customer side as this is the ’problem’ definition
Künzli, West, Ouertani & Ganz, 2016
Analysis of value propositions within the ecosystemPartial example of customer job, pains and gains
Role Customer Job Pains Gains
Channel A Offer equipment from different suppliers (can be part of initial sale); own the equipment; sometimes selling it in own name; storing it at focal company; offer general services
Stock of unsuccessful equipment; too much storage cost; changes in regulations or integrity
Easy implementation in further developed equipment; equipment needs many spare parts
Channel B Offer end-‐product/ plant with products from different suppliers; do the different parts function together?
Reliability; products from different suppliers need to be able to be combined; time and budget; parts do not function together
Collaboration between suppliers to co-‐create; easy installation
Channel C Uses products and further develops them; offers equipment
Products change Better performance but same dimensions
This provided a detailed understanding of what was important for each actor
Künzli, West, Ouertani & Ganz, 2016
Analysis of co-‐creation and co-‐deliveryDifferent levels of involvement collaboration are possible
-‐ Co-‐creation and co-‐delivery was important-‐ Not all actors have all the answers-‐ Not all the actors have all the tools
-‐ The amount of OEM involvement can change-‐ Over time -‐ With particular situations
The OEM should not assume that they have all the solutions
Do It Yourself
Do It For MeDo It With Me
Künzli, West, Ouertani & Ganz, 2016
Analysis of single-‐sided relationships Why is it important to identify and understand single-‐sided relationships?
-‐ ’Give-‐and-‐take‘ supports a balanced relationship-‐ Imbalances can lead to mistrust-‐ There are many forms of value exchange-‐ Exchanges may be separated by time
Sustainability of relationships becomes a risk in single-‐sided relationships
Core Company
Community
Custo
mer
Supp
lier
Business Ecosystem
Extended Business
Core Business
Suppliers
Customer
Services
Services IoTSPServicesGoods
MonetaryInformation IoTSPInformation IoTSP
Künzli, West, Ouertani & Ganz, 2016
Analysis of data over timeInformation is not just data and over time brings knowledge and wisdom
-‐ Data alone is not valuable-‐ Information allows for management action-‐ How to move from date to wisdom when data is fragmented-‐ Lost of data may mean lost future opportunities-‐ Long-‐term cooperation is required between the actors
Do not lose your data; it may have value in the future
Künzli, West, Ouertani & Ganz, 2016
ConclusionsThere are a large number of stakeholders with significantly different value propositions
The customer value proposition plays a central role
Customer as a key partner and their role may change over time
Co-‐creation and co-‐delivery are critical within the IoTSP
The identification of the ecosystem, the actors and what they value is not a trivial task to undertake
Single-‐sided value exchange may not be sustainable
Künzli, West, Ouertani & Ganz, 2016
RecommendationsFurther research and application of the process should be undertaken
A process to describe the ecosystems simply should be developed
Use of the customer as a key partner needs further research
The timing implications of value exchange should be investigated
The process is being operationalised by ABB so that they are able to better use the ecosystem to support their customers
Important to identify and managing single-‐sided value exchange