the upland communities: the post-intervention condition … post intervention.pdf · v south...
TRANSCRIPT
Volume 5
The Upland Communities: The Post-Intervention Condition as
Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Chona R. Echavez, Ph.D.
Research Institute for Mindanao Culture (RIMCU) Xavier University, Cagayan de Oro City
With support from Upland Development Programme (UDP) for Southern Mindanao
The Upland Communities: The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Table of Contents
PAGE Title Page List of Tables iv Executive Summary vi Rationale 1 Socio-Economic and Political Mechanisms with UDP Objectives and Strategies in Relation to Poverty in the Targeted Communities 4 Facts about the Study Areas Profile of the Five UDP Covered Provinces 7 I Compostela Valley 7 II Davao Oriental Province 12 III Davao del Sur Province 17 IV Sarangani Province 22 V South Cotabato Province 28 The Research Findings: Community Level 31
The Community Data Checklist for Intervention Areas (IAs)
and Non-Intervention Areas (NIAs) 31 Accessibility of Communities 35 Economic Status of the Households 39 Availability of Services 40 Other Infrastructures Available 42 Community Plans 43 Community Organizations 44 Children in School 46 Community Health 47 Agricultural Support Services 49 Land Tenure 51 Savings and Loans 53 Remittances 55 Degradation and Misuse of Natural Resources 56
iiThe Upland Communities: The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries Volume 5
PAGE
The Pre and Post Conditions in the Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas: Insights from the field presented by province. 60 Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas in the Compostela Valley: Barangay Level 60
Intervention Areas (IAs) Barangay Level 60 Non-Intervention Areas (NIAs) Barangay Level 66
Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas
in the Davao Oriental: Barangay Level 69
Intervention Areas (IAs) Barangay Level 69 Non-Intervention Areas (NIAs) Barangay Level 77
Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas
in the Davao del Sur: Barangay Level 82
Intervention Areas (IAs) Barangay Level 82 Non-intervention Areas (NIAs) Barangay Level 86
Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas in the Sarangani Province: Barangay Level 90
Intervention Areas (IAs) Barangay Level 90 Non-Intervention Areas (NIAs) Barangay Level 96
Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas in the South Cotabato province: Barangay Level 100
Intervention Areas (IAs) Barangay level 100 Non-Intervention Areas (NIAs) Barangay Level 103
Summary and implication of findings 106 Community Level Research Findings: A Summary 107
Demographic Data 107 Accessibility of Communities 107 Accessibility of Communication Facilities 108 Economic Status of the Households 108 Availability of Services 109 Other Infrastructures Available 110
iiiThe Upland Communities: The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries Volume 5
PAGE
Community Plans 111 Community Organizations 111 Children in School 111 Community Health 112 Agricultural Support Services 112 Land Tenure 113 Savings and Loans 113 Remittances 114 Degradation and Misuse of Natural Resources 114 Types of Soil and Water Management Adapted
in the Community 115
Summary and the Pre and Post Intervention and Non-intervention Areas: Insights from the Field 115
Intervention Areas (IAs) Barangay Level 115 Non-Intervention Areas (NIAs) Barangay Level 117
Implication 120 References 123
The Upland Communities: The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
List of Tables
PAGE Table 1 Land Utilization by crop of the intervention and Non-Intervention
Areas (Post-intervention, 2005) 31 Table 2 Selected Demographics Characteristics in Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas, (“Before” and “After” Conditions),
Baseline (2000) and Post-intervention (2005) Studies 32 Table 3 Infrastructures and Services (whether they are present in the
barangay or not) in the Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas, (“Before” and “After” Conditions), Baseline (2000) and Post-Intervention (2005) Studies 34
Table 4 Accessibility of Communities in Intervention and Non-Intervention
Areas, (“Before” and “After” Conditions), Baseline (2000) and Post-Intervention (2005) Studies 37
Table 5 Accessibility of Communication of Facilities in Intervention and
Non- Intervention areas, (“Before” and “After” Conditions), Baseline (2000) and Post-intervention (2005) Studies 38
Table 6 Economic Status of Households in Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas, (“Before” and “After” Conditions), Baseline (2000) and Post-Intervention (2005) Studies 40
Table 7 Services Available in Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas,
(“Before” and “After” Conditions), Baseline (2000) and Post-Intervention (2005) Studies 41
Table 8 Other Infrastructures Available in Intervention and Non-Intervention
Areas, (“Before” and “After” Conditions), Baseline (2000) and Post-intervention (2005) Studies 43
Table 9 Community Plans in Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas,
(“Before” and “After” Conditions), Baseline (2000) and Post-Intervention (2005) Studies 44
Table 10a Community Organization in Intervention and Non-Intervention,
(Baseline Study, 2000) 44 Table 10b Community Organizations in Intervention and Non Intervention,
Post-Intervention Study (2005) 45
vThe Upland Communities: The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries Volume 5
Table 11a Children in School in Intervention and Non-Intervention
Communities, Baseline Study of Upland Communities and Households, 2000 46
Table 11b Children in School in Intervention and Non-Intervention
Communities, Post-Intervention Study of Upland Communities and Households, 2005 47
Table 12a Community Health in Intervention and Non-Intervention
Communities, Baseline Study of Upland Communities and Households, 2000 48
Table 12b Community Health in Intervention and Non-Intervention
Communities, (Post-Intervention Study, 2005) 49 Table 13a Agricultural Support Services in Intervention and Non-Intervention
Communities, Baseline Study of Upland Communities and Households, 2000 50
Table 13b Agricultural Support Services in Intervention and Non-Intervention
Communities, (Post-Intervention Study, 2005) 50 Table 14a Land Tenures in Intervention and Non-Intervention Communities,
Baseline Study of Upland Communities and Households, 2000 52 Table 14b Land Tenures in Intervention and Non-Intervention Communities,
(Post-Intervention Study, 2005) 53 Table 15a Savings and Loans in Intervention and Non-Intervention
Communities, Baseline Study of Upland Communities and Households, 2000 54
Table 15b Savings and Loans in Intervention and Non-Intervention
Communities, (Post-Intervention Study, 2005) 55 Table 16 Remittances in Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas,
(“Before” and “After” Conditions), Baseline (2000) and Post-intervention (2005) Studies 56
Table 17a Degradation and Misuse of Natural Resources, Farming Systems
and Soil and Water Management Practices in Intervention and Non-Intervention Communities, Baseline Study of Upland Communities and Households, 2000 57
Table 17b Degradation and Misuse of Natural Resources, Farming Systems
and Soil and Water Management Practices in Intervention and Non-Intervention Communities, Baseline Study of Upland Communities and Households, (Post-Intervention Study, 2005) 59
The Upland Communities: The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Executive Summary
This monograph is part of a bigger baseline study that examines the post-intervention
condition of the upland communities covered by the Upland Development Program (UDP) in
Southern Mindanao. UDP was established in October 1998 as a special project of the
Department of Agriculture as an answer to the problems faced by upland communities.
However, it actually started in January 1999.
The main objective of UDP is to develop a replicable model for sustaining the upland
resource base and improving the living standards and prosperity of upland communities. To
achieve its targeted objectives to address upland problems, UDP adopted a six-component
approach, namely: community development, institutional development and extension,
resource management, sustainable agriculture development, rural financial services,
marketing and enterprise development, and agricultural infrastructure support.
A mix of quantitative and qualitative data research approaches was adopted. Data
were collected from various levels, namely, the household, the community and the
community-based organization. This section examines the condition of the upland areas
studied at the community level. The data generated provide a picture of the “after” situation
both at the covered or the intervention areas (IAs) and non-intervention areas or (NIAs) of
UDP.
The community level data were generated using different approaches, namely, the
Focus Group Interview (FGI), interview with key informants and review of secondary data,
namely the barangay profile and other existing records). In the FGI, a minimum of 8 and a
maximum of 12 participants served as interviewees in a focused group setting. A set of
criteria was formulated in the selection of participants, namely: 1) a resident of the purok for
vii
at least seven years; 2) had been involved or participated in community affairs; 3) a member
or official of any community organization; and 4) identified as influential in the community.
Three instruments were used for the community level data, namely: The Community
Checklist, The Community (Barangay and Sitio) Level Instrument, and the Community
Timeline. These were all conducted through Focus Group Interview. The Community
Timeline is a new instrument to further capture the before and after condition of the
intervention and post-intervention communities. This is a part of the triangulation technique
in gathering information to ensure validity and reliability of the data.
A total of 29 communities [19 from the Intervention Communities (ICs) and 10 from
the Non-Intervention Communities (NICs)] were covered at the community level component
of the study.
It has to be noted that the community in this case refers to the barangay where either
the intervention at the sitio level is being implemented or the control barangay wherein no
intervention is implemented in any of its sitio.
Except that IAs are more densely populated than the NIAs, the residents of both
communities share similar demographic characteristics. The population of both areas
increased compared to the baseline data that were gathered five years ago. The majority of
the residents in both IAs and NIAs are Cebuano or Visayan migrants. Even in 2000 (‘before’
condition), the Cebuano still occupied the bulk of the population thus, Cebuano or Bisaya is
the dialect commonly spoken by the people then and now. Until the present, Roman
Catholicism is still the dominant religion in both the IAs and NIAs.
The economy in both the IAs and NIAs is agriculture-based as farming is the most
common source of income before and at present. The top three major crops planted in both
IAs and NIAs include coconut, corn, and banana. The NIAs have been growing bananas
even before 2000 but the IAs instead grew abaca during those years. It is only after 2000
viii
when the IAs learned to adopt the trend. Nonetheless, the number of households producing
banana at present is relatively higher in the IAs than the NIAs.
The single motor or skylab is the principal means of transportation for both areas
before and after intervention. This has increased as the means of transportation in the IAs but
decreased in the NIAs. The second most popular means are PUJ/Truck/Tricycle for the NIAs
and horse/carabao for the IAs.
It takes a longer time to reach the municipal center from the NIAs than from the IAs
by motorbike during the dry season ‘before’ and ‘after’ intervention. In the ‘before’ condition,
it however took longer time to reach the municipal center from the IAs during the wet season
compared to the NIAs but the process again reverses in the ‘present’ condition. However, in
spite of the decrease in travel time, travel cost increased. Improvement in the road network to
cut down travel time did not lower down travel cost because travel cost is dictated more on
the increasing price of gasoline.
Up to the present condition, both communities do not have access to telephone lines.
The number of households who have access to television was comparatively higher in the IAs
than in the NIAs at present condition. The mobile phone phenomenon has reached both the
IAs and NIAs but the former have a higher average number of people who own one at 367
than the latter at 47.7.
Both areas, the IAs and NIAs in the ‘before’ and at present data claimed that there are
poor households in their communities. The ‘before’ data showed that there are more poor
households in the IAs (an average of 375 households) than in the NIAs (an average of 235
households) and the figures increased in the ‘present’ data, 699.27 for the IAs and 296.84 for
the NIAs. It has to be noted that the community level data covered not just the sitios where
the intervention program is being implemented but the whole barangay including the sitios
without intervention.
ix
In the household data where the households included in the study are household
located in the intervention sitios, an increase in the income was noted. The difference in the
household and community data could be in the coverage. At the community level, sitios
within the barangay that has no UDP intervention were still a part in the coverage of the
primary and secondary data gathered for that barangay.
While in the ‘before’ condition nearly half of the communities in the NIAs and a third
of the communities in the IAs have no access to electricity, a remarkable rise in the average
number of households that have been energized in both the IAs and NIAs in the present
condition is reported. The present data showed that there were already an average of 356.82
households and an average of 259.43 households that were energized in IAs and NIAs,
respectively.
It took a slightly longer time for the IAs (an average of 37.2 minutes) than the NIAs
(an average of 25 minutes) to obtain water from the source during the pre-intervention
condition.
In the Post-Intervention Study, the time was relatively shortened for both areas and
data for wet and dry seasons were also gathered. During dry season average time, in minutes,
taken for the households to obtain water from the source decreased to 12.57 and 12.30 for IAs
and NIAs, respectively. During wet season, fetching time consumed dropped to 15.43 and
19.30 for IAs and NIAs, respectively.
It takes a longer time to reach the nearest school in the IAs (an average of 143
minutes) by foot than the NIAs (an average of 111 minutes) in the ‘before’ condition.
However, a cut in the average time spent was noted for both areas. The cut was more
significant in the IAs (from an average of 143 minutes to 34.9 minutes) than in the NIAs
(from 111 minutes to 74 minutes).
In IAs, there is an increase in the availability of other infrastructures such as 1) corn
mill (from 44.4% to 50% of the communities reporting its availability), 2) crop dryer (from
x
72.2% to 100%) and, 3) grain store (from 38.9% to 72.2%). An increase in corn mill and rice
mill was noted in the NIAs. In the household data, a decrease in the corn production was
reported by the respondents. This particular finding may run contrary to the community
finding regarding the increase other infrastructures in the area. Upon a closer examination, an
increase in the number of corn mills in the “after” situation may still be consistent with the
household findings because even with the decrease in corn production, an increase in the
number of corn mills may still be reasonable. The number of available corn mills during the
baseline may not be proportionate to the volume of corn produced. Hence, at the present
situation, even with a decrease in corn production, an increase in the number of corn mills
may still be valid.
Both IAs and NIAs claimed that participatory community planning has been
conducted in the last five years. At present, an increase was noted in the number of
communities that conducted participatory community planning in both areas. Although an
increase is noted in both the IAs and NIAs in the conduct of participatory community
planning as well as in its implementation, data from the Community-Based Organizations
(CBOs) indicated that the implementation of the plan is visible in the IAs than in the NIAs.
In the “before” condition, the top four diseases with the most number of cases per year
and most number of communities affected in the IAs are as follows: malaria, diarrhea, cough,
and fever. The same diseases were common in the “before” condition of the NIAs.
At present, only three diseases emerged to be prevalent in both IAs and NIAs. They
are as follows: cough, fever and diarrhea.
Health services such as prenatal, routine check-up, family planning services, and the
TB program are frequently offered per month in both the IAs and the NIAs. Noticeably, there
are more number of days that family planning services are offered in the IAs than in the NIAs.
At present, more couples in the IAs, are practicing family planning (138.46) than those in the
NIAs (96.97).
xi
In terms of the main form of land tenure, the baseline study as well as the post-
intervention study revealed that more households in the IAs have no titles but are considered
owners of the land, than the households in the NIAs. In all, there is a need to address the
resource tenure improvement in both areas.
The majority of IAs and NIAs in both the baseline and post-intervention studies
experienced the following: erosion, landslides, gully formation, broken hedges, exposed
stones, splash erosion, and sheet erosion. At present, the occurence of these problems have
lessened, particularly in the IAs. Erosion, which was reported to have the highest occurrence
(88.9%) in the IAs was down in its reporting by 14.5 percentage points. In almost all of the
problems identified, there was a decrease in the occurrence. Sheet erosion was more than
halved from 72.2% in the 2000 reports that it did occur to 35.3% in 2005. The NIAs are still
reporting high percentage of occurrence although a slight decrease is noted in the following:
exposed stones, splash erosion, and sheet erosion.
More than 80 per cent of both the IAs and NIAs in the baseline study reported the
presence of forest trees in their respective areas. IAs (94.1) and NIAs (100) in the post-
intervention study revealed an increase in the reporting of the presence of forest trees.
Adoption of a farm system increased in both the IAs and the NIAs in the post-
intervention study. The most remarkable increase is observed in the adoption of contour
farming in the IAs in 2005.
Increase in the adoption of the several types of soil and water management is more
evident in the IAs in 2005. In particular, a remarkable increase was noted in strip contouring,
from 27.8% adoption in 2000 to 88.2% adoption in 2005.
All the intervention areas in the five provinces claimed that there has been
participatory community planning in the last three years. The participatory planning of the
intervention areas mostly included road building or maintenance, school building
xii
construction, and watershed projects. Plans being implemented at present in the IAs include
contour farming, development of a water system, and tree planting, to sustain the forest.
In all of the intervention areas, the efforts made by the LGUs were duly recognized.
Community organizations have different roles in addressing community concerns,
organizational issues and/or individual concerns. In the intervention areas in three of the
provinces, the following were the usual issues encountered: cooperative development in order
to enjoy the benefits of working together; enhancement of women’s participation in the
community and training on gender relations; operation of a micro-finance project; access to
credit and savings; spiritual upliftment; and improvement of the living standard of the people.
While a number of things changed in the IAs, it is also noted that corresponding
changes also occurred in the NIAs. However, there are in the changes that are quite
noticeable in the IAs than in the NIAs. This is specifically true under the following aspects:
1) occurrence of problems due to degradation and misuse of natural resources, 2) presence of
forest trees, 3) farming system agreement adopted in the community, and 4) types of soil and
water management adopted in the community. Along these areas, there seemed to be a ripple
effect because some of the NIAs have adopted some management practices that they have
seen to be beneficial to the community.
Although there are some communities that reported an improvement in their roads due
to UDP intervention, there was not much change in the cost of transportation, It seems that
the rising cost of gasoline is a determining factor in this rather than the improvement in the
road condition.
Increase in income is not yet felt, although diversification gave them security and food
availability. However, they still have to harvest the crops that they planted that will give long
term result. Although there was a slight increase in their savings pattern in the IAs than in the
NIAs, savings in a formal institution is not that much practiced.
xiii
In the area of community and institutional development, the IAs are more dynamic
and active in this aspect since community organizing, value reorientations, leadership
training, among others were conducted in said areas. Sustainability, though,needs to be
emphasized. There are variations in the activities of UBS in various IAs and activities are
also highly dependent on the strength of UBA as an organization and whether members are
active or not.
Both Finance Services System and Enterprise Development need strengthening
because not much can be seen on this at the community level.
To ensure sustainability to the programs installed by the UDP, the LGUs, POs/CBOs,
and the NLAs should join hands and make sure that what has been started and installed should
be sustained specifically along the following areas:
1. Sustainable Agriculture Advocacy. Local government with support from
non-governmental organizations, cooperatives, and community-based
organizations should intensify sustainable agriculture advocacy among
farmers to lessen production costs and to promote environmental
protection. Among the practices promoted are: contour farming, organic
farming, crop diversification, crop-livestock integration, among others.
2. Participation in local governance. Enhance people’s participation in local
governance through participation in the formulation of barangay
development plans, municipal agriculture development plans and other
local development plans; ensure budget allocation for agriculture
development and participate in the policy formulation towards agriculture
development.
3. LGU and POs Capacities on Sustainable Agriculture. Strengthening LGU
and POs’ capacities on sustainable agriculture development through
capacity building for the Municipal Agriculture Office, Municipal Council
and Barangay Council members on sustainable agriculture;
xiv
4. Access to extension services. Install creative means for increasing access
to extension services including the provision of good quality seedlings,
livestock and poultry.
5. Government should address key issues such as access to credit, market
information, infrastructure and technical know-how of the people in the
community.
6. Strengthen and support the practice of diversified and integrated farming
systems. Promote crop diversification and integrated farming systems to
farmers to safeguard farmers against fluctuations inherent in single
cropping practices.
7. Strengthen farmers’ organizations and cooperatives. There is a need to
assess the organizing efforts of government and NGOs to work towards
enabling farmers and farmers organizations/cooperatives on sustainable
agriculture development and to be conduits and partners of the government
in promoting agricultural development in poor communities.
8. Developing alternative rural enterprises. Since most rural households
depend solely on agricultural harvests to meet their basic needs, there is a
need to promote small-scale rural enterprises to augment farmers’
agricultural incomes such as marketing.
9. Capacity building interventions for rural enterprise development and
management. Rural enterprises as income diversification strategy are high
risk. Their success is highly dependent on the capacity and performance of
the manager. Thus, technical assistance in enhancing the management
capability of manager-entrepreneurs, cooperative leaders, PO leaders and
NGO staff for rural enterprises.
10. Linkaging and networking. There is a need and potential for sharing of
experiences, building information linkages and exchanges. Farmers have
to share their experience and learn from the experience of other farmers.
11. Continue to pursue land tenure improvement in the uplands. The POs with
the local government and DENR has to formulate local mechanisms to
resolve land tenure issues and concerns and establish tracking mechanisms
xv
to be updated of the status of the process in securing tenurial instruments.
Local government has to actively support land tenure improvement by
integrating land tenure improvement in its local development plan.
The above recommendations can be captured in the Rural CO Standard (Batistiana and
Murphy, 1996) as spelled out on the following areas of concerns:
• Organizational Development
• Critical Creative Collective Consciousness Raising
• Coalition Effort and Advocacy Work
• Overcoming Gender and other Biases
• Basic Services and Infrastructure
• Resource Tenure Improvement
• Economic Self-Reliance Strengthening
• Agricultural Development and Ecological Nurturance
• Democratic Participation in Governance
The Upland Communities: 1 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
The importance of the uplands could not be over-emphasized. It is an inte-
grated part of the ecological system that what happens in the uplands always affect the lowlands.
Because of this fragile interrelationship, the uplands deserve attention in spite of the fact that
they are smaller in size and in population compared to that of the lowlands.
This is
specifically true
in the Mindanao
uplands where a
huge
development
challenge is at
hand due to the
magnitude of its destruction. Indiscriminate logging, both legal and illegal, in the past is one of
the reasons for the destruction. Second is, with the large tracks of land occupied by large agri-
business, people are left to cultivate the very steep slopes higher than the already steep ones. To
further magnify the problem, migrant lowlanders practice lowland technologies not suited to
steep uplands that result to severe soil erosion, low productivity and very low quality of life.
All of the factors mentioned above interacted resulting to extreme poverty in terms of biodiver-
sity in the Mindanao uplands and, of course, poverty among its inhabitants.
As an answer to the problems faced by upland communities, the Upland Development Program
in Southern Mindanao (UDP) was established in October 1998 as a special project of the De-
partment of Agriculture; however, it actually started in January 1999 when the technical contract
was signed (UDP, 1999). The fund support came from the Government of the Philippines and
the European Union (EU). The UDP’s primary objective is to develop a replicable model for sus-
taining the upland resource base and improving the living standards and prosperity of upland
communities. To achieve it’s targeted objectives and to address upland problems, UDP adopted
a six-component approach, namely: community development, institutional development and ex-
Rationale
The Upland Communities: 2 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
tension, resource management, sustainable agriculture development, rural financial services,
marketing and enterprise development, and agricultural infrastructure support.
This report examines the post-intervention condition of the upland areas studied at the commu-
nity level. The implementation of the intervention began in 2000 and has been in full swing op-
eration since then. At this time, the project can claim a certain level of maturity and a degree of
impact may be seen as manifested in some verifiable indicators. The data generated provide a
picture of the “after” situation both in the covered and non-covered areas of UDP. Specifically,
this delves into the social support network as well as the access to resources and material goods
in the areas studied in relation to the schema adopted by the study.
The “after” condition was gathered in the same areas and the same households that the baseline
study covered. The same core instruments used in the “before” condition were utilized. How-
ever, the format was slightly altered to accommodate “deepening” questions to explore the
“whys” of changes in the “before” and “after” conditions.
The community level data were generated using
different approaches, namely, the Focus Group
Interview (FGI), interview with key informants and
review of secondary data, namely the barangay profile
and other existing records). In the FGI, a minimum of
8 and a maximum of 12 participants served as
interviewees in a focused group setting. A criteria
was formulated in the selection of participants, namely: 1) a resident of the purok for at least
seven years; 2) had been involved or participated in community affairs; 3) a member or official
of any community organization; and 4) identified as influential in the community.
Three instruments were used for the community level data, namely: The Community Checklist,
The Community (Barangay and Sitio) Level Instrument, and the Community Timeline. These
were all conducted through Focus Group Interview. The Community Timeline is a new instru-
ment to further capture the before and after condition of the intervention and post-intervention
The Upland Communities: 3 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
communities. This is a part of the triangulation technique in gathering information to ensure va-
lidity and reliability of the data.
The community timeline identified community level factors that have helped or hindered the
overall prosperity of the community over the past eight years (June 1997 to June 2005); This is
a way of determining significant social and economic changes in the before and after conditions.
A total of 29 communities [19 from the Intervention Communities (ICs) and 10 from the Non-
Intervention Communities (NICs)] were covered at the community level component of the study.
The group interview lasted from one to one hour and a half. Although the selection criteria for-
mulated saw to it that the participants are knowledgeable in their own right, there were instances
that answers differed. There was then a need to validate the FGI data from the secondary data if
ever these were available. In cases whereby no reliable data were available, answers were taken
as they were. With the use of three different approaches, triangulation was done with the data
generated. The data presented are results of the triangulation technique applied to the adopted
approaches; however, there were instances that triangulation could not be done since no data
could be taken from other data gathering techniques.
The Upland Communities: 4 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Socio-Economic and Political Mechanisms with UDP Objectives and Strategies in Relation to Poverty in the Targeted Communities
Poverty is usually regarded
as an indicator of the
economic well-being of an
individual or household but it
can also indicate broader deficiencies in well-being (UNFPA and ANU, 1998: 23 in Echavez,
2000). It has been linked to lack of access to resources and material resources. Hence, access
to resources and material goods is a major factor examined in this “after” intervention report at
the community level in the upland area studied. Access is seen in relation to basic social services
available to the people studied.
More often than not, the provinces with least access to services–particularly, agricultural ser-
vices, health, education, and physical infrastructure, are also identified as the less developed ar-
eas.
This report goes back to the UDP twin objectives: firstly, to achieve development in the upland
areas of Mindanao with emphasis on preservation of natural resources by strong community or-
ganizations, and secondly, to achieve higher incomes for the upland folks, specifically those that
make a living out of farming. It reviews these objectives and examines their outcomes at the
community level.
Attainment of the twin objectives will be reflected in well-protected remaining forest pockets; in
reforestation/agro-forestry of fallow lying non-agricultural lands; in diversified farming on al-
ready farmed land, following an agreed land use plan that delineates what areas are for agricul-
tural development and what areas are for protection and reforestation. They are further reflected
by farmers applying appropriate soil and water conservation measures and in strong community
organizations taking the lead in sustainable upland development.
Thus, this community report examines the key development schemes of the project and its im-
pact at the community level. The key development schemes are as follows: Land Use Based
Participatory Barangay Development Planning through LGU and Community Capacity Building,
Diversified Faming System, Barangay Forest Protection, Routine Maintenance for Barangay
The Upland Communities: 5 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Roads, Rural Financial Services, Village Enterprise Development, and Planning and Monitoring
and Evaluation Schemes.
The schema of the study includes the social structure condition which shapes and creates socio-
economic and political mechanisms of support and which in turn provide pathways towards em-
powerment for development. Empowerment of individuals and communities leads to develop-
ment and a better quality of life. The manifestations of socio-economic and political mecha-
nisms of support are in the form of informational, financial and emotional supports. These are
factors involved in these support structures such as the accessibility and inaccessibility of re-
sources and material goods, namely: jobs/economic activities, health care, housing, human capi-
tal, referral and institutional contact, and conservation and preservation of environmental re-
sources.
Strengthening communities through organizational development therefore is seen as a must.
Community-based organizations will either be established or strengthened for social structures to
function effectively. Capability building of support institutions and the development of collabo-
rative working relationships of various agencies towards watershed development are imperative.
Hence, upland sustainable resource management and market-led agricultural development are
needed.
The project envisions the development of a model for the
sustainable management of natural resources that has the full
support of local government units and the active participation
of communities. Environmental concerns will be addressed
through conservation techniques. The adoption of diversified
on-farm integrated farming systems to secure food production
while protecting the watershed resource base is also tucked into the project through sustainable
agriculture development.
Penniless people are disempowered people. However, financial assistance should not be in the
form of dole-outs. The provision of a savings-based delivery system for production and provi-
The Upland Communities: 6 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
dential loans and savings services on reasonable terms are perceived to help upland farmers help
themselves. Access to financial services by people seen as not “bankable” is an important vehi-
cle towards empowerment. Sustainability is assured if the marketing and entrepreneurial spirit of
upland farmers are also developed hand in hand with the development of agricultural infrastruc-
ture support.
The succeeding discussion focuses on the following: demographic data, accessibility of commu-
nity, communication, economic status, services, other infrastructures, community plans, commu-
nity organizations, schooling of children, community health, food security, agricultural support
services, natural resource management, external support programs, land tenure, non-farm enter-
prises, savings and loans, and remittances.
A backgrounder of the provinces and municipalities, where the UDP operates will provide a con-
text of the data that will be presented.
The Upland Communities: 7 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Facts about the Study Areas
COMPOSTELAVALLEY
Profile of Five UDP-Covered Provinces
I. Compostela Valley1
This newly established province in Southern Min-
danao is bounded by Agusan del Sur on the North,
Davao del Norte on the west, Davao Oriental on the
east and southeast, and Davao Gulf on the west and
southwest. The eastern part of the province is mainly
mountainous. Its climate is classified as typhoon-free,
thus, it experiences even rainfall the whole year
round.
Classified as a first class province, Compostela
Valley is comprised of 11 municipalities grouped
into two districts. These municipalities were carved
out of its mother province, Davao del Norte, in March
1998 to form the new province. History recounts that
it was in the 80’s when a flock of migrants from different places inhabited the land mainly to
stake mining claims in the mountains of Monkayo. As such, small-scale gold mining operations
exist and flourish in the area.
Settlers of various ethnicities and tribes occupied the province and they were comprised of peo-
ple from the Tagalog and Visayan regions. Even the groups from Masaka, Mandaya, and
Manobo tribes were lured to come and dwell in the place. The Masaka tribe is commonly charac-
1 Sources: http://www.globalpinoy.com/travel/province/compostela.php .http://www.tourism.gov.ph/explore_phil/place_details.asp?content=description&province=60
The Upland Communities: 8 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
terized as hunters, and slash and burn agriculturists. Languages and/or dialects commonly spo-
ken in the province are Cebuano/Visayan, Tagalog/Pilipino, Mandaya, Mansaka, Hiligaynon,
Ilocano, Waray, Maranao, and Surigaonon.
Compostella Valley has a total land area of 4, 677 sq. km. with a total estimated population of
600,000 per 2000 National Census and Statistics Office survey. The municipality of Nabunturan
serves as the province’s capital, which could be reached by land from any point in Mindanao.
The capital town is only a 2-hour drive from Davao City. The province could be reached by air
via the Davao International Airport. Apart from passenger planes, several privately owned air-
strips are found in the province, and such are mostly owned by multinational companies. By sea,
the province could be reached through Sasa Wharf in Davao City, which is only a two-hour drive
away.
The province’s economy and source of income is primarily agriculture-based. Compostela Val-
ley has become known as the key producer of high-value fruits and vegetables, which include:
white potato, tomato, and banana. Along with the latter, other major products that the province
produces are rice, corn, coffee, and coconuts.
Compostella Valley is not only popularly known as the “Golden Valley of Mindanao,” for it has
housed the largest reserves of gold in the country, but is also famous for its numerous natural at-
tractions like beaches, waterfalls, forests, mountain ranges, caves, lakes, rivers, hot and cold
springs.
Profile of the UDP Covered Municipalities in the Compostela Valley Province
Municipality of Laak2
2 Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laak,_Compostela_Valley http://elgu.ncc.gov.ph/ecommunity/laak-comval/index.php?cat1=5
The Upland Communities: 9 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Categorized as a 2nd class municipality in the province of Compostela Valley, Laak is po-
litically divided into 40 barangays in which an estimate of 59, 450 people reside based on
the 2000 census.
From the province’s capital, Nabunturan, the municipality of Laak can be viewed in the
northern portion of Compostela Valley and Agusan del Sur. Its boundaries are defined by
the municipality of Asuncion in the province of Davao del Norte on its southwestern por-
tion, the municipalities of Montevista and Monkayo on its southeastern point, the mu-
nicipality of Kapalong on its west, and the municipalities of Veruela and Loreto of the
province of Agusan del Sur on its north.
History has it that the term Laak was already used by the pioneer residents to refer to the
place even before the very formation of its nucleus in 1965. The term was derived from
the name of a small thornless bamboo, which was grown in a particular sitio, now called
sitio Old Laak by the native chieftain, Datu Biyan Atay.
Municipality of Maco3
With a total population of 65,181 and 13,090 households per 2000 census, the municipal-
ity of Maco is comprised of 37 barangays. It is classified as a 2nd class municipality in the
province of Compostela Valley.
Way back in the early days, Maco was once a far-flung village located along the coast of
Davao gulf despite its distance from a bigger town previously called Magugpo (now Ta-
gum City), which was only 12 kilometers away from the latter.
The term Maco is believed to have various origins, one as interpreted by some of the
early migrants (a few still living), and the other by the native inhabitants. The former be-
lieved that the name was originally derived from the word Mamacao, which means an 3 Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maco%2C_Compostela_Valley http://elgu.ncc.gov.ph/ecommunity/maco-comval/
The Upland Communities: 10 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
enormous tree. The latter related that Maco came from another derivative Maraco, al-
though referring to the same meaning i.e. a big tree found in the area. Moreover, to some
early Christian immigrants such as the Boholanos, Maco simply meant big.
Municipality of New Bataan4
New Bataan is politically subdivided into 14 barangays. It is classified as a 2nd class
municipality in the province of Compostela Valley. As per 2000 census, its population
has reached 42,549 people comprised of 8,592 households.
The municipality has a total land area of 67,860 hectares. Out of this figure 30,788 or
45.37 percent is timber land, 16,364 hectares or 24.11 percent is forest reserve, 632 hec-
tares or .93 percent is unclassified public forest and 20,079 hectares or 29.59 percent is
alienable and disposable.
Before it officially became a regular municipality, New Bataan was yet a barangay of
Compostela known as Cabinuangan. The name is a derived from a word "Binuang" be-
cause the area has a high number of binuang trees compared to the other parts of the val-
ley.
Municipality of Mabini5
Mabini was once a mere barangay of the Municipality of Pantukan and was then popu-
larly known as Caumbog. The area was composed of nothing but a vast wilderness popu-
lated by indigenous people particularly from the Mansaka and Kalagan tribes. There was
no record in history where it got its name Mabini. However, folktales have it that the term
Caumbog was a certain derivative from the native word “maambog” referring to the
4 Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Bataan%2C_Compostela_Valley http://www.new-bataan.gov.ph/index.php?cat1=10 5 Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mabini%2C_Compostela_Valley http://elgu.ncc.gov.ph/ecommunity/mabini-comval/index.php?cat1=4&cat2=1
The Upland Communities: 11 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
name of a tree that grew abundantly along the riverbanks. Accordingly, these trees were
remarkably towering that made the area extraordinary and known to the rest of the com-
munities in the region.
It was during 1910 when foreign investors invaded the area primarily because of the rich-
ness and high suitability of the lands. Vast abaca plantations were believed to be estab-
lished and managed by the Japanese. Because of such overwhelming industries, migrants
from the Visayas and Luzon flocked as hired workers in the area and eventually became
permanent settlers who acquired their lands from the minorities and indigenous people by
means of a barter system.
Mabini is a 3rd class municipality in the province of Compostela Valley. According to
the 2000 census, it has a population of 32,058 people in 6,524 households.
II. Davao Oriental Province6
The province of Davao Oriental became a separate
and independent province on May 8, 1967. It is com-
prised of 11 municipalities with the Municipality of
Mati as its capital. The province is situated in the
Southeastern part of Mindanao Island. Its boundaries
are defined on the north by Agusan del Sur, on
the South by Davao Gulf, on the east by the Pa-
cific Ocean, and on the west by Davao province.
The province’s terrain is composed of huge
mountain ranges with uneven distribution of pla-
teaus, swamps, and lowlands. Strategically, the
province is situated outside the typhoon belt. Cli 6 Sources: http://www.globalpinoy.com/travel/province/davaoori.php http://www.tourism.gov.ph/explore_phil/place_details.asp?content=description&province=59 http://www.davaooriental.gov.ph/website/quickfacts.html
DAVAOORIENTAL
The Upland Communities: 12 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
mate in the area is characterized by a short dry season although rainfall is heavily pronounced in
the months of November, December, and January particularly in the coastal districts.
The province has a total land area of 5,164.5 sq. km. As per May 2000 survey conducted by the
National Census and Statistics Office, the province has a total population of 450,000. A varied
mixture of natives and migrants from all over the country characterize the principal inhabitants
of the area. Hence, diverse forms of religions were equally introduced. The Mandaya tribe domi-
nated most of the natives in the province although the Manobo tribe also constitutes the minori-
ties. The former is known for their craft of abaca dressmaking. Their love for the craft is clearly
evident among the men and women settlers, in which the former are commonly characterized
with their loose and wide blue or white cotton trousers and the latter with their embroidered cot-
ton jackets, and tube–like hand woven abaca skirts. These people mostly thrive in the far-flung
mountain clearings and survive by hunting wild pigs and deer using their local-made spears. The
languages and/or dialects widely spoken and understood by the people are Cebuano/Visayan,
Tagalog/Pilipino, and Mandaya.
Although agriculture generated the bulk of the province’s economy, other industries are also
found in the area. Fishing, small and medium cottage industries, and tourism are also considered
primary sources of the province of Davao Oriental. Major agricultural products found in the area
include: coconut, rice, corn, vegetables, and fruits. Durian is the all-time popular fruit in Davao
and its by-products are processed into many kinds of sweet preserves. Huge fishing grounds in
Davao Gulf and the bays of Pujada, Maya, Baculin and Cateel, are very productive in the months
of March to September.
The province’s entry point is Davao City where the Davao International Airport and Sasa Wharf
are located. From there, it only takes a three-hour drive to the capital town of Mati. Nevertheless,
Davao Oriental is accessible by land transportation from any point in Mindanao.
The Upland Communities: 13 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Profile of the UDP Covered Municipalities in Davao Oriental Province
Municipality of Banaybanay7
The municipality of Banaybanay is politically subdivided into 14 barangays. It is a 3rd
class municipality within the province of Davao Oriental that has a population of 33,714
people comprised of 6,448 households.
Municipality of Caraga8
The municipality of Caraga was classified as a 3rd class municipality in the province of
Davao Oriental. As per 2000 census, it has a population of 33,481 people comprised of
6,171 households. Caraga is politically subdivided into 17 barangays.
Municipality of Lupon9
Identified as a 1stclass municipality in the province of Davao Oriental, the municipality of
Lupon derived its name from the Kalagan term “Naluponan,” which means a body of
land accumulated at the mouth of a river resulting from years of continued accretion.
Thus, the term Lupon, which is believed to be abbreviated by the settlers themselves.
As per 2000 census, the municipality has a population of 57,092 people comprised of
10,812 households, and is constituted of 21 barangays.
7 Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banaybanay%2C_Davao_Oriental 8 Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caraga,_Davao_Oriental 9 Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lupon%2C_Davao_Oriental http://www.lupon.gov.ph/index.php?cat1=8
The Upland Communities: 14 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Municipality of Manay10
The municipality of Manay is politically subdivided into 17 barangays. It is classified as
a 3rd class municipality in the province of Davao Oriental. As per 2000 census, it has a
total population of 36,697 people with 7,136 households.
Municipality of San Isidro11
The municipality of San Isidro is bounded on the northeast and north by the municipali-
ties of Alicia and Echague, on the east by the municipality of Echague and west by the
city of Santiago, and on the northwest by the municipality of Ramon respectively. It is
situated 66 kilometers from the capital town of the province of Isable -- Ilagan.
The town of San Isidro was created by virtue of Republic Act No. 4744 enacted by the
Philippine Congress on June 18, 1966. It started operating as a local government unit on
January 1968. It was then classified as a 4th class municipality in the province of Davao
Oriental. It has a land area of 205 km². As per 2000 census, it has a population of 31,705
people comprised of 6,117 households. Around 30% of the population belongs to the
indigenous Mandaya and Kalagan communities. San Isidro is politically subdivided into
16 barangays, seven of which are along the coastlines while the other nine are in the
upland areas.
San Isidro is largely planted with coconut and much of its agricultural industry focuses on
the production of copra. In 1998, the town commenced its first Mango Festival as an
indicator of the prominence of this high yielding fruit. Apart from that, farmers are also
engaged in growing the popular banana (cardava). The municipality is an abode of fish
10 Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manay%2C_Davao_Oriental 11 Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Isidro%2C_Davao_Oriental http://www.sanisidro-isabela.gov.ph/
The Upland Communities: 15 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
sanctuaries in its vast waters. Most of the fishermen in this town use paddle-boat rather
than motorized boat in fishing.
The municipality's seascape brims with potential marine-based recreational industries, as
its marine reserves can provide world-class underwater adventures in the serene and
undisturbed Tinaytay and Burias reefs, a few kilometers offshore. Moreover, its scenic
nature spots include immaculate beaches that have maintained their magnificence despite
urban development, the cascading Cawa-cawa Stepped Falls, and the 12 km² Pygmy or
Bonsai forests in the thickly forested highlands of the municipality.
Municipality of Mati12
The settlement of Mati was officially declared a regular municipality in 1903 by virtue of
Act No. 21 of the Organic Law. Sixty years later, it became the capital town of Davao
Oriental. Mati is a 1st class municipality in the province of Davao Oriental. As per 2000
census, its population already reached to 105,908 people constituting of 21,293
households. It is politically subdivided into 26 barangays.
According to historical accounts, the name “mati” originated from a native word “maa-
ti,” which means “drying up quickly.” The expression was used in reference to a creek
located in the heart of the town and which was predicted to dry up easily even after a
heavy rain.
The original settlers were the Mandayans, Kalagans and Maranaos whose endogenous
culture expresses strong traces of Indo-Malay and Arabic influences. However, with their
interaction with the other native cultures notably Visayans, Tagalogs and Ilocanos whose
subsequent migrations attributed to the employment opportunities in logging, copra and
construction industries with professionals teaching in schools or employed in government
12 Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mati%2C_Davao_Oriental http://www.mati.gov.ph/
The Upland Communities: 16 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
DAVAO DEL SUR
offices and in private establishments, the prevailing culture had been diluted and had now
assumed multi-facial characteristics.
Several factors that have significantly contributed to Mati's prosperity and development
include: its accessibility to Davao City, the regional trade center of Southern Mindanao;
its uninterrupted power supplies; its tropically productive agricultural land planted with
corn, coconuts, mango, citrus, cacao and other fruits; its establishment of Provincial Agri-
Industrial Center (PAIC); and the accessibility of its communication facilities.
III. Davao del Sur Province13
The province of Davao del Sur is one of the provinces
that comprise the Southern Mindanao Region or Re-
gion XI. Its boundaries are composed of Davao City
on the north, Mindanao Sea on the south, Davao Gulf
on the east, and the provinces of Cotabato, Sul-
tan Kudarat and South Cotabato on the west. It
is classified as one of the highly urbanized re-
gions in the country wherein the illustrious Da-
vao City lies.
The word Davao originated from the Bagobo
term Daba-Daba that refers to the sacred brass of
the tribe’s highly-revered chieftain, Datu Duli who
dwelt in Mt. Apo during his reign. Later, the
term was added with a prefix with the letter “o” [in
the English alphabet] thus it became Daba-o Daba-o. It connotes justice and the datu’s equal
treatment towards the people. Eventually, the term was shortened into Davao as time went by.
13 Sources: http://www.globalpinoy.com/travel/province/davaosur.php http://www.tourism.gov.ph/explore_phil/place_details.asp?content=description&province=58
The Upland Communities: 17 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Although the bulk of the population of Davao del Sur is of Cebuano origin comprising almost
51% of the total population of the province, there are several natives who are still traced to be
living in some parts of the area. The Bagobo tribe is one of the cultural minorities that are found
to inhabit the place. This particular native tribe is identified by their multihued traditional dresses
and ornaments. Their clothes are usually made of woven abaca fiber, embossed with beads,
shells, metal disks and other colorful adornments. Since the province had also been inhabited by
people from all over the country, the Bagobos, as well as other minority tribes such as the
B’laans, Tagacaolos, and Manobos have learned to co-exist with the lowlanders. The people in
this region are famous with for baskets, ornate weapons, and their rich tradition of music and
dance. The languages and/or dialects spoken and understood by the residents are Ce-
buano/Visayan, Tagalog, B’laan, Bagobo, Manobo, Tagacaolo, and Muslim. The total population
of Davao del Sur as of May 2000 is 775,000 with an annual rate increase of 2.3 percent.
The province experiences a favorable climate, which is only characterized by two reverse sea-
sons, the wet and dry seasons, respectively. The former usually falls every December and Janu-
ary while the latter falls during the months of April and May. Strategically, the province lies out-
side the typhoon belt.
It is classified as one of the potential producers of agricultural products. It features the fish farms
in Kiblawan and Sta. Maria, a prawn farm and cocoa plantation in Malita, a sugar mill in Ma-
gonoy, and a coconut desiccating plant in Sta. Cruz.
Several airlines regularly fly in from other major airports within the country and even outside the
country. These are available in Davao since it is being serviced by an international airport. Alter-
native means to get to the area is catered by several shipping lines that also post trips from Ma-
nila [the country’s capital] and from other nearby southern points that board passengers and tour-
ists going to the province.
The Upland Communities: 18 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Profile of the UDP Covered Municipalities in Davao del Sur Province
Municipality of Don Marcelino14
The municipality was named in honor of Don Marcelino Maruya, the father of the first
appointed Mayor, Hon. Vicente Maruya. It is identified as a 3rd class municipality in the
province of Davao del Sur, Philippines. According to the 2000 census, it has a population
of 33,403 people with 6,544 households. It is politically subdivided into 15 barangays.
Malita was then the mother municipality of Don Marcelino as history recounted it. For
three and a half decades of the American Regime (1906-1941), immigrants from Cebu
and other provinces of Mindanao settled in the place. The rich coastal plains were
claimed and developed by American Planters, foremost among them were the Woods in
Barangay Culaman, the Patstones in Barangay Lacaron, the Peabodys in Barangay Lais,
the Pahls in Barangay Calian and the Johnsons in Barangay Lamidan.
A certain US marine named Orville Wood was sent by Governor-General Leonard Wood
to the area to enforce the liquor law. With his troops, Wood settled in the fertile bank of
the river dividing the present Poblacion Malita and the Culaman Company to establish
the first recorded settlement in the area.
The first Filipino plantation owner who set foot in Malita was Don Marcelino Maruya.
He was instrumental for the development of the uncharted forest areas specifically those
areas which presently comprise Don Marcelino. He settled in what is now called Baran-
gay Talaguton and initiated the education of the hilltribes consisting of the Tagacaolos,
the B'laans and the Manobos.
14 Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Marcelino%2C_Davao_del_Sur http://elgu.ncc.gov.ph/ecommunity/donmarcelino-dds/
The Upland Communities: 19 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Municipality of Jose Abad Santos15
Jose Abad Santos is a 2nd class municipality in the province of Davao del Sur. According
to the 2000 census, it has a population of 57,147 people with 11,259 households. It is
politically subdivided into 26 barangays.
Municipality of Malalag16
The municipality of Malalag officially became a regular municipality by virtue of Execu-
tive Order No. 596 dated May 28, 1953. It is composed of 15 political subdivisions. It be-
longs to the category of 3rd class municipalities in the province of Davao del Sur. In the
2000 census, Malalag is already the abode of 33,334 people constituting of 7,069
households. Different versions were narrated about the origin of its name. Among the few
were that of the natives who claimed that the name Malalag was derived from the color
that describes the river running within the heart of the town. The water current that di-
rects towards the bay appeared yellowish, thus the natives called “Malalag nga Tubig,”
which means “yellow water.” Such an extraordinary appearance of this particular body of
water lured and enticed many migrants to come to the place.
Municipality of Malita17
The municipality of Malita, in the province of Davao del Sur is composed of 30 political
subdivisions (barangays). It is classified as one of the 1st class municipalities in the re-
gion, which has a population reaching to 100,000 people composed of 20,526 households
as per 200 census.
15 Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jose_Abad_Santos%2C_Davao_del_Sur 16 Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malalag%2C_Davao_del_Sur http://elgu.ncc.gov.ph/ecommunity/malalag-dds/ 17 Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malita%2C_Davao_del_Sur http://elgu.ncc.gov.ph/ecommunity/malita-dds/
The Upland Communities: 20 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
SARANGANI
The early inhabitants of Malita are mostly of the Tagascaolo, B'laan, Manobo, Maguin-
danao, Sangil and Bagobo tribes who are believed to be the descendants of the second
wave of Malays who migrated to Mindanao from other parts of Southeast Asia years be-
fore the birth of Christ. A wave of immigrants from the Visayas, mostly from Cebu, Lu-
zon Island, and so with a number from the neighboring provinces in Mindanao came to
the place in the succeeding years.
Municipality of Magsaysay18
The municipality of Magsaysay is politically subdivided into 22 barangays. It is classified
as a 3rd class municipality in the province of Davao del Sur. As per 2000 census, its total
population already reached to 43,172 people composed of 9,066 households. Much of the
economic activity in Magsaysay rely on rice farming.
IV. Sarangani Province19
The province of Sarangani marked its birth on 1992 as it was
established as an independent province through Republic
Act 7228. Such declaration gave way for development in the
former third district of South Cotabato. Sarangani is consid-
ered as the country’s 76th province and Mindanao’s 23rd. It is
particularly situated in the southernmost part of the
island. Its boundaries are defined by Sultan Kudarat
in the west, South Cotabato in the north, Davao del
Sur in the east, and Celebes Sea in the South. In the
middle of the eastern and western parts of the province lies
18 Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magsaysay%2C_Davao_del_Sur 19 Sources: http://www.globalpinoy.com/travel/province/sarangani.php http://www.tourism.gov.ph/explore_phil/place_details.asp?content=description&province=62 http://sarangani.freewebspace.com/facts/fct-index.html
The Upland Communities: 21 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
General Santos City. The province is identified as the coastal zone of SOCSKSARGEN (South
Cotabato, Sultan Kudarat, Sarangani, General Santos City), one of the country’s developing clus-
ters.
Its vast beachfronts, fertile plains, rolling hills, and mountainous scope but mostly flatlands, de-
scribe Sarangani’s terrain that offer plenty of opportunities for the people. It has seven munici-
palities with the municipality of Alabel as it’s capital. The area is blessed as it is considered ty-
phoon-free and has mild and pleasant weather condition all year long. Its total land area meas-
ures 4,100.42 sq. km. In the 2000 census, the population of the province reached 410,622.
In 1972, the existence of one of the most enigmatic people who hid from the rest of the world for
600 years was revealed. This group of ancient people bore no metal tools, except those that they
learned from a Manobo-Blit hunter. They survived on fruits and rootcrops even before they were
introduced about the metal implements. They dwelt in caves and just covered their bodies with
leaves and vines.
Apart from the historical discovery of the believed predecessors of the Stone Age man, Saran-
gani province is filled with a varied culture of people who speak different languages and dialects
but is still magically in constant harmony with each other despite the uniqueness of each one.
There exist in the province the Cebuano-speaking B’laans and Muslims in the east coast, Ilo-
cano-speaking T’bolis, Manobos, and Muslim in the west coast, and Ilonggo-speaking B’laans
and Kaolos in the north uplands.
The province’s economy is primarily composed of farming and fishing. It produces coconut,
corn, and cotton that likewise serve as its main crops. Livestock and poultry raising are also
proven viable in the place. Marine life species are also produced in larger bulk in the province
thus making Sarangani Bay a rich fishing ground. The province is considered as the major pro-
ducer of copra and sugarcane in SOCSKSARGEN - - there can even be found in the area a
mango plantation of more than 7,000 hectares. Also contributing to the province’s industry is the
presence of giant companies like DOLE Philippines that ventures into banana, pineapple, and
asparagus growing.
The Upland Communities: 22 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Profile of the UDP Covered Municipalities in the Sarangani Province
Municipality of Glan20
The municipality of Glan is bounded on the west by Sarangani Bay, on the north by
Davao del Sur, and on the south by the Celebes Sea. It is a 1st class municipality in the
province of Sarangani. Although it is not the province’s capital, the place is still the seat
of the local provincial government. The 2000 census reflected that the municipality of
Glan has a population of 83,051 people constituting of 16,990 households. It is politically
subdivided into 31 barangays.
Before the advent of the Christian settlers from Cebu, Glan was a vast virgin forest and
wide cogonal terrain. It was inhabited by few ethnic groups mostly B’laan and Muslim
natives, the former occupying the hinterlands and the latter the coastal plains.
The name Glan was a derivation from the Moro term ‘Magalang’ meaning, sharp. History
recounts that Glan was formerly a favorite hunting ground of Moro bluebloods, datus and
other game-loving Muslim bigwig. It was said that there were many deer in the area,
which then became the major prey of the hunters. For hunting purposes, it was but the
best move for the men to keep their bolos, arrows and other bladed weapons always sharp
in order to meet their goal. In time, the place came to be called ‘galang,’ short for Ma-
galang or a place of sharp weapons, and from it the present name Glan was corrupted.
In the municipality of Glan, the source of economy is agriculture with a high level
production of copra. Aquaculture is also seen as the best alternative for generating
income. This includes milkfish and shrimp culture. Other agricultural products are
coconuts, maize, sugarcane, bananas, pineapples, mangoes, pork, eggs, beef, and fish.
20 Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glan%2C_Sarangani http://www.glan.gov.ph/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=16&Itemid=30
The Upland Communities: 23 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
The economy has progressed in the past decade with the biggest contribution from
advances in global communication technology and the finishing of a modern highway
that tremendously improved trade and transport. It has also benefited from its political
role as the seat of the provincial government.
Municipality of Kiamba21
The municipality of Kiamba is bordered on the west by Maitum, on the east by Maasim,
on the north by South Cotabato, and on the south by the Celebes Sea. It is a 3rd class
municipality in the province of Sarangani. It has a population of 44,724 people
constituting of 9,095 households as per 2000 census. It is politically subdivided into 19
barangays.
The term Kiamba originated from the name of a creek, which is located at the eastern
foot of Bakud Point, west of Kiamba proper. According to some old Tagabilis residing in
the place, Kiamba creek was named after Datu Kiamba who was a famous Tagabili chief-
tain. This municipality was formerly known as Kitagas. Cebuano is the commonly spo-
ken dialect among the settlers although they were of Ilocano origin. One of the
indigenous peoples living in the mountainous areas of Kiamba is known as T'boli.
Municipality of Maitum22
In 1928, Maitum became part of the municipality of Kiamba. It was on May 7, 1959
when it was officially announced as a separate municipality through Republic Act 2189.
The municipality of Maitum is internationally famous for the discovery of very old cave
artifacts called Maitum Anthropomorphic Potteries in one of its caves. Likewise, it is
21 Sources: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiamba%2C_Sarangani http://www.kiamba.gov.ph/ 22 Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maitum%2C_Sarangani
The Upland Communities: 24 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
nationally known for its well-enforced solid waste disposal system. This system has been
largely successful through the support of its residents through the years.
Maitum is one of the 3rd class municipalities in the province of Sarangani. In the 2000
census, it has a total population of 35,536 people composed of 7,640 households, and a
land area of 324.35 km². Its coordinates are 6°02' N 124°29 E. It is politically subdivided
into 19 barangays. It is bordered on the west by the province of Sultan Kudarat, on the
east by the municipality of Kiamba, on the north by the province of South Cotabato, and
on the south by the Celebes Sea.
Majority of its population is of Ilocano origin. One of the indigenous peoples living in the
mountainous areas of Maitum is known as T'boli.
The municipality is often referred to as the “rice granary” of Sarangani due to its high
level production of rice. Thus, its main economy is agriculture-based. Apart from that,
aquaculture, notably the culture of milkfish (bangus), prawns (particularly giant prawns)
and shrimps for export, is also seen as a promising venture that can generate income.
Other agricultural products are coconuts, maize, sugarcane, bananas, pineapples,
mangoes, pork, eggs, beef, and fish. Maitum is also a food basket nationally famous for
its dried fish.
The economy has progressed in the past decade, and this is best attributed to the advances
in global communication technology and the finishing of a modern highway that
tremendously improved trade and transport.
Municipality of Malungon23
The municipality of Malungon is a landlocked town at the northeastern part of Sarangani.
It is bounded on the west by Tupi, South Cotabato, on the north and east by the province
23 Sources: http://www.malungon.gov.ph/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=13&Itemid=28 http://www.malungon.gov.ph/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12&Itemid=28
The Upland Communities: 25 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
of Davao del Sur, on the south by Alabel, Sarangani and General Santos City, and on the
southwest by Polomolok, South Cotabato. It is 37 kilometers away from Gen-
eral Santos City and 43 kilometers away from Alabel, the seat of the Provincial Govern-
ment.
It is classified as a 1st class municipality in the provice of Sarangani and is politically
subdivided into 31 barangays. It has a land area of 896.63 km². According to the 2000
census, it has a population of 93,232 people composed of 18,924 households.
The main source of income is agriculture with a high level production of dried coconut
meat. Animal husbandry, specifically cattle farming, is one of its best alternatives to raise
income. Other agricultural products are coconuts, maize, sugarcane, bananas, pineapples,
mangoes, pork, eggs, beef, and fish.
As with some other municipalities in Sarangani province, the state of economy in this
particular municipality has shown progress in the past decade, with significant
contribution from the advances in global communication technology and the finishing of
a modern highway that tremendously improved trade and transport.
The Upland Communities: 26 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
SOUTH COTABATO
V. South Cotabato Province24 Located in the southern part of Mindanao, the province
of South Cotabato is enclosed on the north and the west
portion by the province of Sultan Kudarat, on the south
by Sarangani and Sarangani Bay, and on the east by
Davao del Sur. It was officially declared as one of the
country’s existing provinces on July 18, 1966 when the
Old Cotabato province was divided into North and
South. The province is composed of 11 towns with
Koronadal as its capital. It has a total land area of
3,376.92 sq. km. and has a registered population of
690,728 as of the 2000 census. The province’s
topography is generally flat, with scattered hills, and
isolated mountains. It is considered as a typhoon-free
site wherein rainfall is evenly distributed throughout the year. The months from March to June
are considered the hottest while December and January are the coolest.
Migrants from Luzon and Visayas, particularly the Panay inhabitants, mainly populate the land.
The province is even considered the melting pot of religions and cultures since the province also
housed several tribal population that include the T’boli, Ubo, B’laan, and Tagabili. The T’boli
natives are considered one of the most colorful people of Mindanao, who live in the site around
Lake Sebu, a mountain lake surrounded by rolling hills. This particular tribe is best identified
through their inclination to wear personally beaded and colorful ornaments. They are lovers of
embroidered dresses, bangles, bracelets and other accessories.
24 Sources: http://www.globalpinoy.com/travel/province/scotabato.php http://www.mindanao.org/socsksargen/overview/ka2.htm http://www.mindanao.org/davao/overview/ka5.htm
The Upland Communities: 27 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
As it claims to be the breadbasket of the South, South Cotabato is considered an agricultural ha-
ven producing agricultural products from its rich and fertile lands. Koronadal and Allah Valleys
comprise farmlands producing rice and corn. The municipality of Polomolok is where the im-
mense pineapple plantation is found, supplying the Dole Philippines’ canneries. Vast tracks of
banana plantations are found near General Santos City. Other source of living found in the prov-
ince is through fishing. In fact, the vast water that surrounds the island particularly Sarangani
Bay provides and offers a massive fishing industry for the people.
Profile of the UDP Covered Municipalities in Sarangani Province
Municipality of Tantangan25
The municipality of Tantangan derived its name from the word “Kulitangtangan,” which
means a bell so enormous that when it rings its sound could reach distant places.
The area is located at the mouth of a big river called Luayan and empties its water into a
very big lake. Tangatangan is classified as a 4th class municipality in the province of
South Cotabato. According to the 2000 census, it has a population of 32,636 people
composed of 6,583 households. It is politically subdivided into 13 barangays. During its
creation, the municipality of Tantangan encompassed an area of 32,000 hectares.
With favorable weather conditions and with competent and persistent leadership of past
and present leaders, the Municipality of Tantangan is fast growing in its role as the cereal
(grain) producer of the province of South Cotabato.
25 Sources: http://foo.ncc.gov.ph/ecommunity/tantangansc/index.php?option=com_frontpage&Itemid=1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tantangan%2C_South_Cotabato
The Upland Communities: 28 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Municipality of Tampakan26
The municipality of Tampakan is politically subdivided into 13 barangays and as per
2000 census, its population already reached to 33,011 people constituting of 6,754
households. It is identified as one of the 4th class municipalities in the province of South
Cotabato.
26 Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tampakan%2C_South_Cotabato
The Upland Communities: 29 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
The Research Findings: Community Level
The Community Data Checklist for Intervention Areas (IAs) and Non-Intervention Areas (NIAs) Community Instrument 2 produced a checklist of communities both in the intervention areas “be-
fore” and at present (which serves as “after” the UDP intervention has been introduced). Infor-
mation includes the following: 1) land utilization by major crops, 2) selected demographic pro-
file, 3) infrastructure and services (whether they are present in the barangay or not), and 4) eco-
nomic activities/ support services, animals (birds and livestock) and household produce.
It has to be noted that the community in this case refers to the barangay where either the inter-
vention at the sitio level is being implemented or the control barangay wherein no intervention is
implemented in any of its sitio.
In both IA and NIA, the top three major crops planted are: coconut, corn and banana (Table 1).
Table 1. Land Utilization by Crop of the Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas (Post-Intervention, 2005)
Area Land utilization by crop (three major crops mentioned) Intervention (n=19) Non-Intervention Area
(n=9) Coconut 84.2 77.8 Corn 79.8 66.7 Banana 57.9 66.7
It is but expected that the population in both IA and NIA increased in all areas from the 2000
base year compared to the present number (Table 2). This is also true as to the average number
of households in these areas. The IAs are more heavily populated than the NIAs. Cebuano is the
dominant language for both IAs and NIAs followed by Bilaan. However, Mandaya is the third
The Upland Communities: 30 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
language for the IAs while Ilonggo and Tiboli are the two languages that ranked as third in use in
the NIAs. As to religion, both areas are predominantly Roman Catholic while the rest belong to
other Christian denominations.
The majority of the residents in both IAs and NIAs are Cebuano or Visayan migrants while the
Mandaya and Bilaan tribes exist in eight and seven communities, respectively. There was not
much change in the 2000 data when it comes to language used, religion, and tribal data for the
present data.
Table 2. Selected Demographic Characteristics in the Intervention and Non- Intervention Areas, (“Before” and “After” Conditions), Baseline (2000) and Post-Intervention (2005) Studies
Area Intervention (n=19) Non-intervention (n=10)
Before 2000 (n=18)
At present (n=19)
Before 2000 (n=7)
At present (n=9)
Ave. population of the communities 9009.4
11065.4
2894.25
3350.2
(n= 16) (n=19) (n=8) (n=10) Ave. number of households 1662.6
2182
517
700.6
Population characteristics (n= 19) (n=19) (n=10) (n=10)
Dialects (major ones) Bisaya/Cebuano Bilaan Mandaya Ilonggo Tiboli
14 6 5
15 6 5
9 4 3 3
9 4 3 3
Religion R. Catholic Protestant (Four square gospel, UCCP, Church of Christ) Baptist Born Again (Christian Faith, Alliance) SDA Iglesia ni Kristo
18 17
9 9
18 17
9 9
9 5
6 5
9 5
6 5
Tribes Bisaya/Cebuano Mandaya Bilaan
12 8 7
12 8 7
6
6
The Upland Communities: 31 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
There was an increase in the IAs in their infrastructures and services (with 2000 as the “before”
and the present as “after” the intervention: 1) barangay health centers, 2) barangay health center
workers and supplies, 3) post-harvest facilities (dryers and warehouse), 4) source of potable wa-
ter, 5) energy /power source/lighting source (the biggest increase from 8 communities to 13
communities, 6) roads (farm to market, bridges), 7) sewerage (was present in 4 communities and
has doubled to 8 at present), 8) flood control (present in two communities “before” but increased
to four more, totaling to six at present), and 9) recreation/sports facilities (basketball courts, etc.)
(Table 3).
An increase was also noted in the NIAs in the following: 1) barangay health center, 2) workers
in the health centers and supplies, 3) source of potable water, 4) energy/power source/lighting
source, 5) sewerage, 6) flood control infrastructures, and 7) means of transportation to other ar-
eas. However, the increase in the number in the NIAs is a bit lower than the IAs. It is noted
though that NIAs have other facilities such as mini-gym, mini-public market, training center,
day-care center, feeding center, and foot trail compared to the IAs.
The Upland Communities: 32 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Table 3. Infrastructures and Services (whether they are present in the barangay or not) in the Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas, (“Before” and “After” Conditions), Baseline (2000) and Post-Intervention (2005) Studies
Area Intervention
(n=19) Non-intervention
(n=10)
Before 2000
At pre-sent
Before 2000
At pre-sent
1. barangay hall 14 14 9 7 2. barangay health center (building/facilities) 11 13 6 8 3. barangay health center manpower and sup-plies 11 13 5 7 4. chapel/mosque 14 14 9 9 5. post-harvest facilities (dryers, warehouse, etc.) 12 14 7 7 6. source of potable water 11 14 6 8 7. energy/power source/lighting source 8 13 5 8 9. roads (farm to market, bridges (identify whether all-weather road, macadamized road, etc.) 12 13 8 9 10. sewerage 4 8 4 6 11. flood control infrastructure (dikes, drainage) 2 6 2 4 12. irrigation facilities (dams, irrigation canals) 1 1 13. recreation/sports facilities (basketball courts, etc.) 13 14 8 8 14. means of transportation in going to the area 12 12 8 9 15. Others: Barangay warehouse 1 1 16. Other Infrastructures a) Mini-gym 1 1 b) Mini public market 1 2 Other Infrastructures, cont’d c) Training center 1 1 d) Day care center 2 2 e) Feeding center 1 1 f) Foot trail 1 1
Farming is the main source of livelihood for both IAs and NIAs. Aside from the three major
crops mentioned earlier, the IAs reported abaca as another crop that they planted before the year
2000. Banana is a crop that the IAs planted at present but not before 2000. The NIAs have been
planting bananas before 2000 and are still planting bananas at present. The number of house-
holds producing such crops is higher in the IAs than the NIAs.
The Community Data Barangay Level from Instrument 2A produced the following information:
1) accessibility of community, 2) means of communication and media and program choice, 3)
economic status, 4) services, 5) other infrastructures (more specific than those in the checklist),
6) presence of community plan, 7) average number of children enrolled in school, 8) community
The Upland Communities: 33 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
health (state as revealed by presence of common diseases, services offered and average number
of days; services are offered per month), 9) food security, 10) agricultural support services, 11)
external support programs, 12) land tenure, 13) savings and loans, 14) remittances, 15) degrada-
tion and misuse of natural resources, and 16) community organization/people’s organization.
Accessibility of Communities
Distance, Travel Time, and Focal Point of Trading. The single motor or skylab is the principal
means of transportation for both areas. This has increased as the means of transportation in the
IAs but has decreased in the NIAs (Table 4). The second most popular means in the “before
condition are public utility jeepney (PUJ)/truck/tricycle (45.4%) for the NIA (ranks third for IA
at 22.2%) and horse/carabao (27.8%) for the IA (ranks third for NIA at 27.3%). Whereas in the
present condition, horse/carabao and even hiking as a means of reaching the IAs increased com-
pared to before, since bamboo, raft and pump boat are no longer in use.
The focal point of trading for the barangay for both IAs and NIAs in the “before” condition was
the municipal center but it was higher in the IAs (47.1%) than the NIAs (36.4%). The municipal
center is still the focal point of trading at present but there was a slight decrease in the percentage
for such answer. For the NIAs, other municipality/city/ province (30%) rivaled the choice be-
cause this group was ranked first which is similar to that of the municipal center as focal trading
center. For the IAs, other focal trading centers also emerged and these were other barangays but
same municipality (11.1%) and another municipality/city/province (21.7%)
In the “before” condition, the average cost of transporting a sack of corn to the nearest trading
center is higher in the IAs (P49.90) than the NIAs (P32.90). At the IAs, the cost of transporting
a sack of corn ranges from P15 to P108 per sack while in the NIAs the range is from P12.50 to
P80 per sack. At present, an increase was noted at the IAs with an average of P82.90 per sack
while the cost at the NIAs was a bit lower at P30.50 per sack.
It takes a longer time to reach the municipal center from the NIAs (an average of 87.7 minutes in
the “before” condition and 50.87 at the present condition) by motorbike during dry season than
The Upland Communities: 34 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
the IAs (an average of 55.0 minutes “before” and 40.23 minutes at present). During wet season,
the average travel time to reach the municipal center by motorbike is 93 minutes “before” and
52.62 minutes at present whereas it will take an average of 75.0 minutes for the “before” condi-
tion for the NIAs and still around that time (70.17) for the present. It is noted though that one
community in the non-intervention area will take 12 hours to reach the municipal center by foot
during wet season from the “before” data. This particular community was not included in the av-
eraging. Reaching the municipal center by foot was not entertained as an option because it is
very risky.
The estimated time to reach the municipal center by foot is longer in the NIAs than the IAs.
This was true for both wet and dry seasons but it was a longer travel during wet season for both
areas.
The responsibility for maintaining the road trail from the sitio to the barangay in the “before”
data rests on the barangay or barangay officials (90.9%) in the case of NIAs while the majority
(64.7%) of IAs answered it rests on the people through voluntary work. However, with the pre-
sent data, majority (83.3%) of the IAs identified the barangay/barangay officials as those respon-
sible for maintaining the road trail from the sitio to the barangay. They added municipal gov-
ernment (44.4% for IAs and 20% for NIAs), provincial government (27.8% for the IAs and 40%
for the NIAs) as other bodies responsible for the maintenance of roads. The role of people and
purok leaders decreased at the IAs (22.3%) but an additional category was added, that of UDP
(5.6%).
Table 4. Accessibility of Communities in the Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas, (“Before” and “After” Conditions), Baseline (2000) and Post-Intervention (2005) Studies
The Upland Communities: 35 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Areas Intervention Area Non-Intervention Area
“Before” (n=18)
At present (“After”) (n=18)
“Before” (n=11)
At present (“After”) (n=10)
Principal Means of Transportation Single motor/Skylab 61.1 77.9 63.6 50 Jeep/PUJ/Truck/Tricycle 22.2 16.7 45.4 30 Horse, Carabao 27.8 22.2 27.3 Bamboo Raft/Pumpboat 5.6 - 18.2 Others (tractor, bus) 11.1 27.3 Hike 16.7 22.2 0 Focal Point of Trading for the barangay Barangay 29.4 16.7 27.3 10 Municipality (Center) 47.1 44.4 36.4 30 Another barangay, same municipality 11.1 20 Others (another municipality, city, province)
23.5
21.7
36.3
30
Estimated Cost of Transporting a Sack of Corn from the Barangay to the Nearest Trading Center
49.90 (range from
P15 to P108/sack)
82.90 (range from 28.74 to
276.17)
32.90 (range from P12.50 to P80/sack)
30.5 (range from 16.67 to
60)
Estimated Travel Time To Reach the Mu-nicipal Center by Motorbike or usual ve-hicle used (average in minutes)27
Not accessible by motorbike or other vehicle
17.6 (3) -
Dry Season 55.0 40.23 87.7 50.87 Wet Season 93.0 52.62 (n=17) 75.028 70.17 Estimated Travel Time To Reach Munici-pal Center by Foot2
Dry Season 170.0 174.50 202.5 283 Wet Season 244.6 206.42 277.5 322 Responsible for maintaining the road trail from the sitio to the barangay
Barangay/barangay officials 35.3 83.3 90.9 50 Municipal government 44.4 20 Provincial government 27.8 40 People (voluntary work)/residents/purok leaders
64.7 22.3 9.1 20
UDP 5.6 Accessibility of Communication Facilities. Both IAs and NIAs do not have access to telephone
lines for the “before” and the present condition (Table 5). It was noted with the present data that
27 The travel time to reach the municipal center by foot in one community in the intervention area is 9 hrs. during dry season and 10 during wet season. This was not included in the averaging. 28 The travel time to reach the municipal center by foot of one community in the non-intervention area is 12 hrs. during during wet season. This community was not included in the averaging.
The Upland Communities: 36 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
households have access to televisions (average number of households that have access at the IAs
is 140.04 and 77.4 at the NIAs).
According to the present data, people prefer news as the program that they listen to over the ra-
dio but the preference is slightly higher in the IAs (72.2%) than the NIAs (60%). They do listen
to drama (44.4% for the IAs and 50% for the NIAs). It was also noted that the mobile phone
phenomenon has reached both the IAs and NIAs but IAs have higher average number of people
who own one at 367 than the NIAs at 47.7
Table 5. Accessibility of Communication Facilities in the Intervention and Non-Intervention, (“Before” and “After” Conditions), Baseline (2000) and Post-Intervention (2005) Studies
Areas Intervention Area Non-Intervention Area
“Before” (n=18)
At present (“After”) (n=18)
“Before” (n=11)
At present (“After”) (n=10)
Average Number of HHs with access to Telephone Lines (Landline) None
100
100
100
100 Average number of HHs with access to television
140.04 (range from
3.75 to 326.8)
77.43 (range from 0 to 315.33)
Top three commonly tuned-in programs and the respective stations frequently listened to* Drama DXDC Bombo radyo/DXRO DXCP News Bombo Radyo DXDC DXHM FM (Music) Star FM Energy FM Radyo Natin
44.4
33.3 27.8
72.2 27.8 16.7
16.7 11.1 5.6
50
40
60 20
10
10 Average number of people who have cell phones
367.07 (range from
10.33 to 1000)
47.7 (range from 0.5 to
178)
The Upland Communities: 37 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Economic Status of the Households
Both areas, the IAs and NIAs in the “before” and at present data claimed that there are poor
households in their communities (Table 6). In the “before” data, there are more poor households
in the IAs (an average of 375 households) than in the NIAs (an average of 235 households). The
figures for the “at present” data increased, 699.7 for the IAs and 298.8 for the NIAs. It has to be
noted that the community level data covered not just the sitios where the intervention program is
being implemented but the whole barangay including the sitios without intervention.
In the household data where the households included in the study are household located in the
intervention sitios, an increase in the income was noted. The difference in the household and
community data could be in the coverage. At the community level, sitios within the barangay
that has no UDP intervention were still a part in the coverage of the primary and secondary data
gathered for that barangay.
In the “before” situation, slightly more than three quarters of the IAs while only a fifth from the
NIAs claimed that there are rich households in their respective communities. The average num-
ber of rich households in the IAs is 71.3 in the “before“ situation while the figure increased at
225.7 in the present situation while an average of 15.3 are rich households in the NIAs in the
“before” situation and has increased to 55.7 in the present situation. It seems that for both IAs
and NIAs the number of poor households increased and the number of rich people increased but
the increase in the number of poor households is higher than that of the rich households.
The Upland Communities: 38 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Table 6. Economic Status of the Households in the Intervention and Non- Intervention, (“Be-fore” and “After” Conditions), Baseline (2000) and Post-Intervention (2005) Studies
Areas Intervention Area Non-Intervention Area
“Before” (n=18)
At present (“After”) (n=18)
“Before” (n=11)
At present (“After”) (n=10)
Are there poor households in the com-munity
Yes 100 100 100 100 No Average number of poor households in the community
375 (range from
60% to 100%)
699.27 (range from 268.33 to 1313.72)
235 (range from
75% to 100%)
296.84 (range from 138 to 731)
Are there rich households in the com-munity (percentage)
Yes 77.8 88.9 80 70 No 22.2 11.1 20 30 Average number of rich households in the community
71.3 (range from 0 to 30%)
225.65 (range from 3
to 617.22)
15.3 (range from 0 to 21%)
55.66 (range from 5 to 116.33)
Availability of Services
A distinctive rise in the average number of households that have access to electricity is noted in
both the IAs and NIAs. This would mean that in the upland area, energization has been going on
in the past five years (Table 7).
In the “before condition,” the average time for a household to obtain water from the source are
37.2 minutes and 25 minutes for the IAs and NIAs, respectively. In the Post-Intervention Study,
the time was relatively shortened for both areas and data for wet and dry seasons were also gath-
ered. The time was more than halved for the IAs for both dry and wet season while it was cut
into half for the dry season in the NIAs. There was not much change in the information about the
number of children enrolled per grade level provided by both IAs and NIAs. But a cut in the av-
erage time to walk to the nearest school in minutes was noted for both areas but the reduction
was more significant in the IAs (from an average of 143 minutes to 34.9 minutes) than in the
NIAs (from 111 minutes to 74 minutes). There was a slight increase in the none functioning
health clinic post for the IAs (from 5.6% to 11.1%). The responsibility of the BHW as the per-
son who manages the health clinic increased both for the IAs (from 5.6% to 55.6%) and NIAs
The Upland Communities: 39 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
(from 18.2% to 70%). The percentage of communities that reported that the doctor does not re-
port to the clinic increased for both areas (from 22.2% to 50% for IAs and from 18.2% to 40%
for NIAs).
Table 7. Services Available in the Intervention and Non-Intervention, (“Before” and “After” Conditions), Baseline (2000) and Post-Intervention (2005) Studies
Areas Intervention Area Non-Intervention Area
“Before” (n=18)
At present (“After”) (n=18)
“Before” (n=11)
At present (“After”) (n=10)
Average Number of Households that have Access to Electricity
29.3 (range from
9 to 289)
356.82 (range from
10.67 to 838.6)
43.5 (range from
1 to 85)
259.43 (range from 0 to 1148.
67) Average Time Taken for the Household to Obtain Water from the Source (minutes) Dry season Wet season
37.2 (range from
0 to 180)
12.57 (range from 5 to 22.5)
15.43
(range from 5 to 27
25.0 (range from
5 to 90)
12.30 (range from 2 to 30.5)
19.30
(range from 2 to 60.5)
Educational Services Provided by Grade Level, if any, in the Community (percentage)
Primary Only 5.6 - Complete Elementary 88.9 88.9 100.0 90 Secondary 5.6 - Average Time to Walk to the Nearest School (Minutes)
143 (range from 30 to 300)
34.97 (range from
5 to 74)
111 (range from 15 to 360)
74 (range from 2.5 to
240) Presence of Functioning Health Clinic/Post (percentage)
None 5.6 11,1 18.2 10 There Is 94.4 88.9 81.8 90 Person Responsible for Managing the Health Clinic
None 5.6 - Midwife 83.3 83.3 63.6 60 BHW 5.6 55.6 18.2 70 Others (Nurse/Doctor/BNS) 11.1 18.2 10 Number of Times that Doctors Serve in the Clinic
None 22.2 50 18.2 40 Once a week 5.6 - 9.1 Once or twice a month 22.2 5.6 9.1 Quarterly - 11.1 18.2 10 Once a year 22.2 11.1 36.4 10 Others ( twice a year; sometimes, request-based)
27.8 11.1 9.1 40
The Upland Communities: 40 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Other Infrastructures Available
There was an increase in the availability of the following infrastructures in the IAs: 1) corn mill
(from 44.4% to 50% of the communities reporting its availability), 2) crop dryer, and 3) grain
store (Table 8). An increase in the establishment of corn mill and rice mill was noted in the
NIAs.
The IAs also reported additional infrastructures that were not present during the baseline study,
which are as follows: barangay warehouse, abaca stripping machine, and coffee mill.
In the household data, a decrease in the corn production was reported by the respondents. This
particular finding may run contrary to the community finding regarding the increase other infra-
structures in the area. Upon a closer examination, an increase in the number of corn mills in the
“after” situation may still be consistent with the household findings because even with the de-
crease in corn production, an increase in the number of corn mills may still be reasonable. The
number of available corn mills during the baseline may not be proportionate to the volume of
corn produced. Hence, at the present situation, even with a decrease in corn production, an in-
crease in the number of corn mills may still be valid.
The Upland Communities: 41 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Table 8. Other Infrastructures Available in the Intervention and Non-Intervention, (“Before” and “After” Conditions), Baseline (2000) and Post-Intervention (2005) Studies
Areas Intervention Area Non-Intervention Area
“Before” (n=18)
At present (“After”) (n=18)
“Before” (n=11)
At present (“After”) (n=10)
Presence of the Following Infrastructure (percentage):
Rice Mill 33.3 33.3 0 10 Corn Mill 44.4 50.0 30.0 40 Crop Dryer 72.2 100 90.0 90 Grain Store 38.9 72.2 20.0 10 Sheller 10 Barangay warehouse 5.6 Abaca stripping machine 5.6 Presence of the Following Infrastructure (percentage) cont’d:
Coffee mill 44.4 Presence of the following Social Infra-structures in the Community (percent-age)
(n=18) (n=11)
Community Hall 83.3 94.4 36.4 80 Church/Chapel 100.0 100 100.0 100 School 100.0 100 100.0 100 Basketball Court/Solar Dryer 27.8 22.2 27.3 30
Community Plans
Both IC (88.9%) and NIC (81.8%) claimed that participatory community planning had been con-
ducted in the last five years (Table 9). However, an increase was noted in the communities that
conducted participatory community planning in both areas. Integration of these plans in the
barangay municipal plan has been done before and up to the present.
Although an increase is noted in both the IAs and NIAs in the conduct of participatory commu-
nity planning as well as in its implementation, data from the Community-Based Organizations
(CBOs) indicated that the implementation of the plan is visible in the IAs than in the NIAs.
The Upland Communities: 42 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Table 9. Community Plans in the Intervention and Non-Intervention, (“Before” and “After” Conditions), Baseline (2000) and Post-Intervention (2005) Studies
Areas Intervention Area Non-Intervention Area
“Before” (n=18)
At present (“After”) (n=18)
“Before” (n=11)
At present (“After”) (n=10)
Participatory Community Planning Con-ducted in the last Five Years
Yes 88.9 94.4 81.8 90 No 11.1 5.6 18.2 10 Plans are Implemented at Present 83.3 90 Plans are Integrated in the Baran-gay/Municipal Plan (for those that have plans)
100.0 (all of 16)
83.7 88.9 (8 out of 9)
80
Community Organizations
In the “before” condition, almost all communities found in the intervention and non-intervention
areas claimed that there are community groups that meet on a regular basis in their respective
communities (Table 10a). There are residents in the IAs (66.7%) and NIAs (45.4%) that are
members of cooperatives based outside their respective communities.
Table 10a. Community Organizations in the Intervention and Non-Intervention, (Baseline Study, 2000)
Areas Intervention Area “Be-
fore” (n=18)
Non-Intervention Area“Before”
(n=11) Presence of Community Groups That Meet on a Regular Basis (Percent-age)
Yes 94.4 90.9 No 5.6 9.1 Membership of Residents in Coopera-tives Based Outside the Community
Yes 66.7 45.4 No 33.3 54.5
At present (“after” the intervention condition), a number of organizations have been identified to
be operating both in the IAs and NIAs (Table 10b). In the IAs, moderately sized organizations
are identified as follows: school organizations, credit groups, livelihood assistance organiza-
The Upland Communities: 43 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
tions, and women’s groups. In the case of NIAs, the following are moderately sized organiza-
tions: religious organization and school organization. NIAs have a large membership of senior
citizens’ groups.
The very active groups in the IAs are the school organization and the volunteer group (in cases
of emergency situation) while the moderately active ones are the multi-purpose cooperative,
farmers/fisherfolks’ organization, drivers’ organization, credit groups, and service organization.
In the NIAs, the active groups are the drivers’ organization, services organization, and senior
citizens’ group. Groups and organizations have been thriving in both areas for the past five
years.
Table 10.b. Community Organizations in the Intervention and Non-Intervention, Post-Intervention Study (2005)
Area Intervention (n=18) Non-intervention (n=10)
Organizations Membership* Level of Activ-ity**
Membership* Level of Activ-ity**
1. Women’s group 2. Multi-purpose Cooperative 3. Farmer’s/Fisher folk’s Or-ganization/ Cooperative 4. Tribal Organizations 5. Youth Organizations 6. Religious Organizations 7. School Organizations 8. Driver’s Organization 9. Credit Groups 10. Volunteer Groups 11. Services Organization 12. Livelihood Assistance 13. Senior Citizen’s Group
2.70
2.67
2.31
2.67
2
1.50
3
1.5 3 1
2
2.75
2.5
2.80
3.67
3.62
3
3
3.67
4
3 3 4
3.4
2.75
3
2.125
2
1.75
2
2.67
3
1 2
2.5
2
4
3.12
3
2.25
3
3
4
3 3
4
3
4 *Membership: very large= 4; large=3; moderate=2; small=1
The Upland Communities: 44 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
**Level of activity: very active=4; moderately active=3; not very active=2; almost inactive or inactive=1
Children in School
In the “before” condition, there are more children of school age that completed elementary edu-
cation in the NIAs (an average of 123.7 per community) than the IAs (an average of 51.5 per
community) (Table 11a). As the figures are disaggregated by sex and again, whether boys or
girls, the numbers are still higher in the NIAs; it is noticeable that the number for girls is higher
than the boys in both areas. The reason could be that more girls are able to finish their elemen-
tary schooling since the boys are tapped as helpers in the farms.
When the number of school age children who are currently attending secondary school was ex-
amined, more students are found in the IAs (an average of 68.9 per community) than the NIAs
(an average of 53.9 per community). However, the pattern of having more girls than boys at-
tending school is still true.
Table 11a. Children in School in the Intervention and Non-Intervention Communities, Baseline Study of Upland Communities and Households, 2000.
Intervention Area Non-Intervention Area Items Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls
Average number of school age (less than 15 years) children that finished elementary school
51.5 (range
from 2 to 210)
21.4 (range
from 2 to 80)
30.1 (range
from 7 to 130)
123.7 (range
from 3 to 300)
48.5 (range
from 0 to 156)
75.2 (range
from 3 to 225)
Average number of school age chil-dren who are currently attending sec-ondary school
68.9 (range
from 1 to 404)
30.8 (range
from 1 to 177)
38.1 (range from 11 to 227)
53.9 (range
from 9 to 275)
24.3 (range
from 2 to 132)
29.6 (range
from 6 to 143)
At present (“after” condition), an increase in the average number of children that finished ele-
mentary school is noted from the baseline data in the IAs but a decrease in the NIAs. More chil-
dren are also reported to be currently attending secondary school (Table 11.b). This is true for
both IA and NIAs.
The Upland Communities: 45 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Table 11b. Children in School in the Intervention and Non-Intervention Communities, Post-Intervention Study of Upland Communities and Households, 2005.
Community Health
In the “before” condition, the top four diseases with the most number of cases per year and most
number of communities affected in the IAs are as follows: malaria (average number of 319.4
cases in 12 communities), diarrhea (average number of 109.4 cases in 8 communities), cough
(average number of 163 cases in 7 communities), and fever (average number of 173.7 cases in 6
communities) (Table 12a). In the NIAs, lesser number of communities is affected considering as
well that there were fewer NIAs included in the study. The top four diseases are as follows:
colds (average number of 110 cases in 2 communities), cough (average number of 80 cases in 3
communities), fever (average number of 79 cases in 3 communities), and malaria (average of
60.3 cases in 3 communities).
There are more malnutrition cases in the IAs (an average of 104.6 children affected in 16 com-
munities) than the NIAs (an average of 49.3 cases in 7 communities).
Intervention Area (n=18) Non-Intervention Area (n=10) Items Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls
Average number of school age (less than 15 years) children that finished elementary school
87.60 (range from 31.75 to 200) (n=14)
44.13 (range from 15 to 90)
57.55 (range from
16.75 to 110)
60.43 (range from
18.25 to 126.67)
30.03 (range from 11 to 66.67)
35.60 (range from 11 to 60)
Average number of school age children who are currently at-tending secondary school
96.02 (range from 29.83 to 283) (n=12)
41.43 (range from 12.5 to 128)
55.58 (range from
15.33 to 155)
179.83 (range
from 3 to 96.33)
75.17 (range from 2 to 44.67)
26.17 (range
from 1 to 51.67)
The Upland Communities: 46 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Table 12a. Community Health in the Intervention and Non-Intervention Communities, Baseline Study of Upland Communities and Households, 2000.
At present, in the IAs, the top three most common diseases are cough, fever and diarrhea (Table
12b). These diseases were also noted in the NIAs but the cases are fewer in number compared to
that of the IAs. Table 13b also shows the services offered in the nearest health posts and average
number of households who availed of each type of service per month as well as the average
number of days of services offered per month. It is noted that the health services are availed of
by the households in both areas but the average number of households in the IAs who availed of
the services is higher than that of the NIAs. Family planning (for IAs), pre-natal services (for
both IAs and NIAs) and provision of Vitamin A (for IA only) are the services that registered the
highest number of days in these areas. The average number of couples practicing family plan-
ning is higher in the IAs (138.4) than the NIAs (96.87). It is also noted that there are more num-
ber of days for family planning services in the IAs than the NIAs.
Intervention Area (cases/year)
Non-Intervention Area (cases/year)
Common Diseases Malaria 319.4 (n=12) 60.3 (n=3) Fever 173.7 (n=6) 79 (n=3) Cough 163.6 (n=7) 80 (n=3) Colds 204.6 (n=5) 110 (n=2) Diarrhea 109.4 (n=8) 54 (n=4) Skin disease 190.7 (n=3) 18 (n=2) TB 27 (n=3) 8 (n=2) Malnutrition Cases (average no. of children affected)
104.6 (n=16)
49.3 (n=7)
The Upland Communities: 47 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Table 12b. Community Health in the Intervention and Non-Intervention Communities, (Post-Intervention Study, 2005)
Area Intervention (n=17) Non-intervention
(10) Three most common diseases or sicknesses that the community suffers from and the average number of cases of each respective type of disease per month (even if not treated by health workers)* Cough Fever LBM/Diarrhea
237.41 116
25.38
25.33 22.33 21.88
Services offered in the nearest health posts and aver-age number of households who availed of each type of service per month * Immunization Prenatal Routine check-up Provision of Vitamin A Family Planning TB Program Malaria services (blood-smearing) Filariasis campaign (only in 1 barangay) Environmental Sanitation (only in 1 barangay) Garantisadong Pambata (only in 1 barangay)
171.01 141.49 137.67
265 143.15
3.75 240.8
586.33 534.5 863
39.89 36.06 81.20
151.75 100.62
2 15
Average number of days of services offered per month Immunization Prenatal Routine check-up Provision of Vitamin. A Family Planning TB Program Malaria services (blood-smearing) Filariasis campaign (only in 1 barangay) Environmental Sanitation (only in 1 barangay) Garantisadong Pambata (only in 1 barangay)
3.55 6.3
12.42 0.34 12.65
20 0.0027 0.0027
0.34 0.0055
1
4.67 12.60
1.5 8.88 4.75
1
Average number of couples who are practicing family planning
138.46 (range from 20 to
400.3)
96.97 (range from 35 to 169.33)
Agricultural Support Services
In the “before” condition, there are slightly more agriculture staff assigned in the NIAs (an aver-
age of 1.9 per community) than the IAs (an average of 1.3 per community) (Table 13a). How-
The Upland Communities: 48 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
ever, there were more communities in the NIAs (36.4%) that were not provided with agricultural
support staff than the IAs (12.5%).
The conduct of training/seminars was the most often mentioned support given in both areas
(71.4% in the IAs and 85.7% in the NIAs). This was followed by giving out seedlings (50%) in
the IAs and monitoring agricultural crops (42.9%) in the NIAs as well as the IAs (42.9%).
Table 13a. Agricultural Support Services in Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas, Baseline Study of Upland Communities and Households, 2000.
Areas Intervention Area Non-Intervention Area
Average number of staff of Department of Agriculture (if any) assigned in the community
1.3 (n=14)
1.9 (n=7)
None (percentage) 12.5 (2 out 16) 36.4 (4 out of 11) Activities of DA staff in the commu-nity:
None 6.2 28.6 Conduct training/seminars/provide TA 71.4 85.7 Give out seedlings and seeds 50.0 28.6 Monitor agri-crops 42.8 42.9 Conduct survey 28.6 - Disperse animals 14.3 28.6 Assist organizations - 14.3
At present, the DA staff visits the IAs more frequently than the NIAs; however, the municipal
staff was slightly more frequent in his/her visits to the NIAs than in his/her visit to the IAs (Table
13b).
Table 13b. Agricultural Support Services in Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas, Post-Intervention Study, 2005.
AREA Intervention (n=17) Non-intervention
(10) Average number of visits the community has re-ceived from the municipal agricultural officer staff or from the Department of Agriculture staff in the last 12 months Municipal Staff DA Staff
24.99 (range from 12.33 to 48) 39.93 (range from 6 to 123)
27.3 (range from 1.5 to 97) 4 (range from 1 to 12.5)
The Upland Communities: 49 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Land Tenure
In the “before” condition, six out of the 18 IAs did not provide data about the main form of land
tenure in the community (Table 14a). None among the IAs and NIAs provided an answer on the
question whether owners of the land have formal land titles. Slightly more than a fifth (22.2%)
of the IAs and slightly more than a quarter (27.3%) of the NIAs answered that there are owners
with tax declaration in their respective communities. Almost a half (45.4%) of the NIAs pro-
fessed that the main form of land tenure in their communities is tenancy.
An average of 273.8 households in the IAs and 103.4 in the NIAs have no titles but are consid-
ered owners of the land. The average number of households who are renters are more or less the
same between the IAs (68.2) and NIAs (70.0). Although, they did not provide any answer for
ownership of formally titled land, they had answers for the average number of households who
are owners of formally titled land (A & D) with individual ownership title and the result is an
average number of 72.1 households in the IAs and 40.6 in the NIAs.
Almost all the communities, 94.4% in the IAs and 81.8% in the NIAs wish to obtain improve-
ment in their land tenure situation. Seven out of 10 communities in both IAs and NIAs have af-
firmed that the process has begun.
The Upland Communities: 50 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Table 14a. Land Tenure in Intervention and Non-Intervention Communities, Baseline Study of Upland Communities and Households, 2000.
Area Intervention (n=18) Non-Intervention (n=11)
Main Form of Land Tenure in the community (percentage)
No Data 33.3 (6) Owner of formally titled land - - Owner with tax declaration 22.2 - Land owner w/o title 16.7 27.3 Stewardship 11.1 9.1 Tenant 16.7 45.4 Renter - 9.1 Main Form of Land Tenure (Average no. of HHs)
Average no. of hhs. With no title but considered owner of the land
273.8 103.4
Average no. of hhs. Who are renters or sharecroppers
68.2 70.0
Average no. of hh. Owners of formally titled land (A & D) with individual owner-ship title
72.1 40.6
Average no. of hh. Communal with lim-ited tenure (like CBFMA)
25.1 1.0
Other tenurial instruments (specify) tenant
19.5
6.2
Community Wishes to Obtain Im-provement in its Land Tenure Situa-tion
Yes 94.4 81.8 No 5.6 18.2 If Yes, has this process begun Yes 72.2 72.7 No 27.8 27.3
At present, Table 14b presents a picture of the land tenure arrangement in both the IAs and
NIAs. There is still a need to address resource tenure improvement in both areas.
The Upland Communities: 51 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Table 14b. Land Tenure in Intervention and Non-Intervention Communities, Post-Intervention Study, 2005.
AREA Intervention (18) Non-intervention
(10) Average number of households that have each of the following land tenure arrangements: No title but considered owner of the land by community Renters or sharecroppers Owner of formally titled land (A&D) with individual own-ership title Communal limited tenure instrument like CBFMA Stewardship
288.94 78.41
138.70 101.32 34.62
258.31 71.13
157.62 36.38
44 Savings and Loans
In the “before” condition, seven out of the 18 and four out of the 11 communities in the interven-
tion and non-intervention areas claimed that they simply could not save out of their earnings
(Table 15a). Of those who could save, they pointed out that they save their money by raising
farm animals as investments or they engage in private lending (63.6% of the IAs and 57.1% of
the NIAs). More respondents from the IAs (63.6%) prefer to save through their piggy bank than
the NIAs (28.6%).
An average of 290 families in the IAs while an average of 91.5 families in the NIAs have out-
standing loans with lenders. The top four sources of loans for the IAs are as follows: family and
friends (38.9%), banks (27.8%) and traders (22.2%) and private moneylenders (22.2%). The top
three sources of loans for the NIAs are as follows: banks (45.4%) and the rest got a rating of
36.4% each: family and friends, traders, private moneylenders and cooperatives.
The Upland Communities: 52 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Table 15a. Savings and Loans in Intervention and Non-Intervention Communities, Baseline Study of Upland Communities and Households, 2000.
Areas Intervention Area (n=18) Non-Intervention Area
(n=11) If resident wants to save money, do they do this?
None (cannot save) 38.9 (7) 36.4 (4) Banks 18.2 57.1 Invest/raise farm animals/private lending
63.6
57.1
Traders/Business/ Coop 18.2 57.1 Piggy Bank 63.6 28.6 Estimate number of families in the com-munity that have outstanding loans with lender
Ave. of 290 from 10 communities
Ave. of 91.5 from 4 communities
Sources of Loan (n=18) (n=11) Family and friends 38.9 36.4 Traders 22.2 36.4 Private Money lenders 22.2 36.4 Cooperatives 11.1 36.4 Banks 27.8 45.4
At present, in the IAs, the average number of households that save in an institution that
pays interest is 137 while in the NIAs, the average number of households is 28.8. In the IAs,
other financial institutions such as Rural Financial Institutions of UDP, Upland Barangay Asso-
ciation or UBA have been mentioned as the institutions where they save and where their savings
earn interest. However, it is also noted that very few households did save in these newly identi-
fied institutions. The average number of households that have availed of a loan has increased
(from the baseline data) in both areas but the increase in the IAs is higher than that of the NIA.
The Upland Communities: 53 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Table 15b. Savings and Loans in Intervention and Non-Intervention Communities, Post-Intervention Study, 2005.
AREA Intervention (n=17) Non-intervention
(10) Average number of households (if any) that save with an institution, which pays interest
137.02 (range from 26.67 to 270)
28.83 (range from 0 to 47)
Rural Banks Cooperative Commercial banks Rural Financial Services Of UDP (Financial Service Cen-ter, Savings & loan Group) Upland Barangay Association (UBA) Lending Firm
5.42 3.69
3
6.25 3 1
4 4.5 2
Average number of communities with families that are probably saving money in this way
168.55 (range from 80 to 270) (n=16)
54.11 (range from 30 to 94)
Average number of families in the community that have outstanding loans (whether banks, coopera-tives, traders etc.,) with lenders that charged interest
476.46 (range from 204 to 1375.8)
(n=16)
242.37 (range from
20 769.33) How many families are these (expressed in percent-age)
42.22 (range from 30 to 56.5) (n=16)
34.9 (range from 6 to 62)
Average number of households that have loans, which were taken out more than a year ago
382.06 (range from 122.5 to 944.2)
(n=16)
160.17 (range from 10 to 370.33)
Of those who have loans, approximately how many borrowed from each of the following sources (ex-pressed in percentage) Family and friends Traders Private money lenders Cooperatives Banks
30.35 34.68 14.53
25 7.54
23.42 32.24 14.33 16.99 8.53
* Multiple responses
Remittances
In the “before” condition, there were more households in the IAs (an average of 45.1 households
out of 12 communities) that have members who migrated outside the community and who occa-
sionally send money to those who are left behind than the NIAs (an average of 19.4 households
out of 9 communities). At present, the number of families who have members who migrated
outside the community increased in both areas but the increase is higher in the IAs than the NIAs
(Table 16).
The Upland Communities: 54 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Table 16. Remittances in the Intervention and Non-Intervention, (“Before” and “After” Con-ditions), Baseline (2000) and Post-Intervention (2005) Studies
Areas Intervention Area Non-Intervention Area
“Before” (n=18)
(cases/year)
At present (“After”) (n=17)
(cases/year)
“Before” (n=11)
(cases/year)
At present (“After”) (n=10)
(cases/year) Estimate number of families in the community that have members who migrated outside the community (in-cluding OFWs) who occasionally send money
45.1 (average no. of hhs. out of 12 communi-
ties)
84.02 (range
from 40 to 196)
19.4 (aver-age no. of
hhs. out of 9 communities)
33.17 (range
from 10 to 61.67)
Degradation and Misuse of Natural Resources
In the “before” condition, the majority of both IAs and NIAs experienced the following: erosion,
landslides, gully formation, broken hedges, exposed stones, splash erosion, and sheet erosion
(Table 17a). The highest percentage of occurrence reported by the IAs is erosion at 88.9 per cent
while the NIAs reported the occurrence of erosion and landslides at 90.9 each. The lowest for IA
is that of landslides at 66.7 per cent while the NIAs reported the occurrence of the following
problems at 81.8 per cent each: gully formation, broken hedges, exposed stones, splash erosion
and sheet erosion. Both areas, however, still reported the presence of forests: 88.9 per cent for
the IAs and 81.8 for the NIAs.
As to the farming systems agreement adopted in the IAs, two out of five adopted contour farm-
ing, half adopted integrated agro-forestry, and another two out of five adopted crop-based inte-
grated farming. In the case of NIAs, more than half (54.5%) adopted contour farming, slightly
more than a third (36.4%) adopted integrated agro-forestry and another slightly more than a third
(36.4%) adopted commercial crop-based integrated farming.
As to the soil and water management mechanisms adopted in the community, half to slightly
more than half of the IAs adopted the following: gradual shift from seasonal to perennial or
permanent crops, ground cover cropping, and minimum zero tillage (55.6%). Two out of the
five IAs adopted protection of river and road embankment. A fifth to slightly more than a quar-
The Upland Communities: 55 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
ter of the IAs adopted hedgegrows (22.2%) and strip contouring (27.8%). Less than 20 per cent
of the IAs adopted mulching (16.7%) and water impounding (16.7%).
In the case of the NIAs, still, in the “before” situation, more than half adopted the following:
gradual shift from seasonal to perennial or permanent crops (72.7%), minimum or zero tillage
(63.6%), strip contouring (54.5%) and mulching (54.5%). Slightly more than a quarter adopted
the following: hedgegrows (27.3%) and water impounding (27.3%).
Table 17a. Degradation and Misuse of Natural Resources, Farming Systems and Soil and Water Management Practices in Intervention and Non-Intervention Commu-nities, Baseline Study of Upland Communities and Households, 2000.
Intervention Area Non-Intervention Area
Yes No Yes No A. Occurrence of the following problems: erosion 88.9 11.1 90.9 9.1 landslides 66.7 33.3 90.9 9.1 gully formation 83.3 16.7 81.8 18.2 broken hedges 77.8 22.2 81.8 18.2 exposed stones 77.8 22.2 81.8 18.2 splash erosion 77.8 22.2 81.8 18.2 sheet erosion 72.2 27.8 81.8 18.2 B. Presence of forest trees in the community 88.9 11.1 81.8 18.2 C. Presence of land use agreement 54.5 45.4 D. Farming systems agreement adopted in the community contour farming 44.4 55.6 54.5 45.4 integrated agro-forestry 50.0 50.0 36.4 63.6 commercial crop-based integrated farming 44.4 55.6 36.4 63.6 E. Types of soil and water management adopted in the community
a. hedgegrows 22.2 77.8 27.3 72.7 b. strip contouring 27.8 72.2 54.5 45.4 c. minimum or zero tillage 55.6 44.4 63.6 36.4 d. gradual shift from seasonal to perennial or permanent crops 50.0 50.0 72.7 27.3 e. ground cover cropping (leguminous plants) 50.0 50.0 45.4 54.5 f. mulching 16.7 83.3 54.5 45.4 g. water impounding (fishpond) 16.7 83.3 27.3 63.6
h.protection of river and road embankment (bamboo planting) 42.8 57.1 63.6 36.4 F. Land conflicts that occur in the community a. adjacent sitio within the watershed 27.8 72.2 54.5 45.5 b. between land users groups 38.9 61.1 54.5 45.5 c. between individuals 61.1 38.9 100.0 - d. adjacent sitios, barangay, or municipality outside the water-shed
33.3 66.7 63.6 36.4
In the “before” condition, more than half (61.1%) of the IAs reported that land conflicts between
The Upland Communities: 56 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
individuals occured in the community. Less than a third to slightly more than a third of the IAs
reported about land conflicts occuring in the community between adjacent sitios within the wa-
tershed (27.8%), between land users’ groups (38.9%), and adjacent sitios, and barangay or mu-
nicipality outside the watershed (33.3%).
In the case of NIAs, majority reported about land conflicts between the following: adjacent si-
tios between the watershed (72.2%), adjacent sitios, barangay or municipality outside the water-
shed (66.7%) and between land users (61.1%). Slightly more than a third (38.9%) reported about
occurrence of conflict between individuals.
At present, there is a lessening in the degradation and misuse of natural resources, and an im-
provement in farming systems and soils and water management practices in the IAs is noted (Ta-
ble 17b). Erosion, which was reported to have the highest occurrence (88.9%) was down by 14.5
percentage points. In almost all of the problems identified, there was a decrease in the occur-
rence. Sheet erosion was more than halved from 72.2% in 2000 reporting to 35.3% in 2005. The
NIAs are still reporting high percentage of occurrence although a slight decrease is noted in the
following: exposed stones, splash erosion, and sheet erosion.
The number of communities reporting the presence of forest trees in the community increased as
well. A remarkable increase in the farm system adopted in the community is observable in the
IAs. From a report of 44.4% contour adoption in 2000, the number rose in all communities
adopting contour farming, from 50% adopting integrated agro-forestry to 88.2% in 2005. An
increase was also noted in the adoption of commercial crop-based integrated farming, from 44.4
in 2000 to 64.7% in 2005 in the IAs.
The adoption of several types of soil and water management in the IA is also evident. A remark-
able increase was noted in strip contouring, from 27.8% adoption in 2000 to 88.2% adoption in
2005. An increase was also noted in the NIAs but the increase was more evident in the IAs in
almost all types of farming systems as well as types of soil and water management adopted by
the communities.
The Upland Communities: 57 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
A decrease in the land conflict in the IAs was noted in the following areas: between land users
groups and between individuals, but an increase in conflicts in the following also occurred: ad-
jacent sitio within the watershed and adjacent sitios, barangay or municipality outside the water-
shed. In the NIAs, a decrease was noted in all types of conflict.
Table 17b. Degradation and Misuse of Natural Resources, Farming Systems and Soil and Water Management Practices in Intervention and Non-Intervention Communities, Post-Intervention Study, 2005.
Intervention Area Non-Intervention Area
Yes No Yes No A. Occurrence of the following problems: Erosion 74.4 23.5 90 10 Landslides 52.9 47.1 70 30 gully formation 70.6 29.4 80 20 broken hedges 64.7 35.3 60 40 exposed stones 54.8 49.2 50 50 splash erosion 70.6 29.4 50 50 sheet erosion 35.3 64.7 50 50 B. Presence of forest trees in the community 94.1 5.9 100 C. Presence of land use/watershed agreement 76.5 23.5 50 50 D. Farming systems agreement adopted in the com-munity
contour farming 100 - 70 30 integrated agro-forestry 88.2 11.8 60 40 commercial crop-based integrated farming
64.7 35.3 30 70
E. Types of soil and water management adopted in the community
a. hedgegrows 47.1 52.9 40 60 b. strip contouring 88.2 11.8 70 30 c. minimum or zero tillage 58.8 41.2 40 60 d. gradual shift from seasonal to perennial or permanent crops
76.5 23.8 50 50
e. ground cover cropping (leguminous plants)
82.3 17.7 40 60
f. mulching 52.9 47.1 40 60 g. water impounding (fishpond) 58.8 41.2 40 60 h. protection of river and road embankment (bamboo planting)
76.5 23.5 50 50
G. Land conflicts that occur in the community e. adjacent sitio within the watershed 41.2 58.8 20 80 f. between land users groups 35.2 64.8 40 60 g. between individuals 58.8 41.2 60 40 h. adjacent sitios, barangay, or municipality outside the water-shed
52.9 47.1 40 60
The Upland Communities: 58 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
The Pre and the Post Conditions in the Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas: Insights from the Field Presented by Prov-ince
This section explores the insights of people in the intervention and non-intervention communi-
ties, how they perceive the situation in their respective communities on some key issues “before”
the UDP Project was introduced and at present (which represents the “after” condition). This
section further attempts to relate the strategies the UDP adopted and how these impacted or are
translated in the community and the individual lives of people in these areas. While the previous
section gave a general view of the representative areas in both intervention and non-intervention
communities, this part of the report tries to give the details and explanations of the numbers and
figures presented in the earlier section.
Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas in the Compostela Valley: Barangay Level Land Use Based Participatory Barangay Development Planning through LGU and Com-munity Capacity Building Even before the UDP Project started, both the IAs and NIAs claimed that participatory commu-
nity planning has been conducted in the last five years. All IAs and 88.9 per cent of the NIAs
have integrated the said community plans in the barangay/municipal plans. However, IAs and
NIAs did not indicate that land-use based participatory barangay development planning through
LGU was conducted.
Intervention Areas (IAs): Barangay Level
After the project, the stakeholders in the IAs in Compostela Valley Province claimed that
there has been participatory community planning in the area in the last three years. The
participatory community planning include: road building, health assistance, agriculture
development, annual development plan in elementary school construction, health center
The Upland Communities: 59 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
construction, farm to market road planning, waiting shed construction planning and water
system planning.
Participatory community planning was initiated to address common problems in the
community such as the difficult road condition by exposing travelers to risk and danger
and the inconvenience of bringing farm products to the market. They further claimed that
health-related and infrastructure problems in the area can be addressed through participa-
tory planning. Bringing together people to plan can generate better solutions and plan of
actions.
► Community Organizations in IAs and their Roles
One of the things that is
noticeable after the project has
been introduced is the
establishment and or the
strengthening of existing
organizations. There are 15
community organizations with
different levels of capabilities
in the area. Community
organizations have different
roles in addressing community concerns, organizational issues and/or individual concerns
such as:
• Environmental protection • Unity and cooperation in the community • Sports development • Wise use and proper maintenance of community resources • Enhanced participation of women in community activities and improved • gender relations in the home and community • Availment of reasonable prices of household commodities and farm • production inputs • Continuing education to enhance farming technologies
The Upland Communities: 60 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• Spiritual upliftment • Access to credit by farmers to invest in farm production
According to the stakeholders, community organizations are prime movers of the follow-
ing activities:
• Community beautification • Livelihood training sessions such as handicrafts making, sewing • Monitoring of UDP projects • Cooperative development training • Community meetings • Leadership training sessions
Aside from the various organizations operating in the IAs, the people who attended FGIs
identified other institutions/organizations (both government and non-government who are
actively supporting the IAs and by providing assistance in various forms). This is a part
of networking, establishing and strengthening linkages and partnership. By doing so,
people and organization harmonize and integrate efforts, thus, widening the scope and
strengthening the impact of programs and activities. They are the following:
• Barangay/Municipal/Provincial Local Government Units • UDP • Philippine Eagle Foundation • DOLE • UD • MINSSAD • DANECO • Congressional Office • Local Parish • NCIP • PCA • CDA
► The LGU and Its Role
The LGU’s role in helping the people hand in hand with the implementation of the UDP
Project is recognized by the people. They identified the following services extended by
the Municipal LGU to the IAs:
The Upland Communities: 61 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• Conduct training on appropriate farming techniques that include grafting, contour-
ing, livestock/animal-hog raising
• Conduct training on sustainable agriculture • Carabao injection • Monitoring • Provision of planting materials – tree seedlings and vegetable seeds • Provision of farm inputs such as fertilizer, herbicide • Orientation to avail of loan
► Types of Soil and Water Management in Relation to Degradation and Misuse
of Natural Resources
One of the evident changes in the data presented in table form in the earlier section is re-
flected in Tables 18a and 18b. The change from the baseline data as reflected in the oc-
currence of problems, adoption of farming system agreements as well as soil and water
management made a difference in the IAs. The informants and participants elaborated on
what was reported. They noted that improvement in soil fertility and the occurrence of
problems previously identified were at least minimized because, according to them, they
have not totally eliminated them. Here are some of their observations:
• Those farm areas that were introduced with chemical fertilizers are dependent on ex-
ternal inputs to generate more production. In those areas that chemical fertilizers were not introduced, they produced more without the chemical inputs.
• With UDP’s assistance, soil fertility has improved due to reduction in soil erosion from planting of trees, contour farming and other soil-water conservation techniques. The trees prevent soil run-off or erosion. Trees were planted on vacant agricultural lands. Both DA and DENR assisted in this endeavor. The people emphasized that the practice of contour farming has improved soil fertility by preventing soil and wa-ter run-off.
• Farmers do not practice slash and burn farming unlike before. • But, there are still areas with heavy flooding and erosion. • With improved farming practices from training activities provided by UDP, soil fertil-
ity has improved and banana production has increased. • Financing from UDP to support appropriate farming practices resulted in improving
soil fertility.
The Upland Communities: 62 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
As to the water supply, they noted that they are still feeling the impact of decades of cut-
ting trees in their area. They also brought up that the construction of Level II water sys-
tem in the IAs. Communal faucets with reservoirs are established - - the UDP Project has
installed a total of four. The installation of communal faucets has reduced the time and
effort in fetching water. The establishment of water systems was made possible by com-
bining or harmonizing project funds from UDP, congressional funds, the parish, and
LGUs both at the municipal and the barangay levels.
Changes in the forest
The forest area is dwindling due to indiscriminate cutting of trees. Without livelihood
options, community members have resorted to cutting of trees as one of the easiest ways
to earn income. However, there are existing efforts to plant different types of fruit and
forest trees. The UDP, DENR and DA are the agencies providing assistance in reforesta-
tion and tree planting. They also educate communities on environmental awareness and
strengthen the campaign against illegal logging.
Land-use agreement
When informants and participants were asked about the existing land use agreement, the
answer given was the Certificate of Stewardship Contract (CSC) for 25 years under the
condition that the land has to be developed properly by the CSC holder. They also men-
tioned that there is an existing watershed agreement based on Watershed area proclama-
tion to protect and not abuse watersheds by Community-Based Forest Management As-
sociation (CBFMA). The activities include tree planting and protection of existing trees.
The funding for items such as materials, hired labor, and volunteers to protect and main-
tain watershed areas was provided by UDP. The stakeholders in the agreement were the
following the following: the Ramos Administration, DENR, Barangay Council, and
UDP-DENR.
The Upland Communities: 63 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
► Programs and Projects in the IAs
The forms of assistance given for specific programs and projects as identified by the
stakeholders in the community are as follows:
UDP
• Training sessions (capacity building) on marketing and enterprise
development, • Diversified farming systems (DFS), sustainable agriculture development
(SAD), and appropriate farming technologies • Livelihood projects such as livestock dispersal • Road rehabilitation • Small infrastructure projects such as day care center, farm to market road,
road rehabilitation, water system installation, school building, bridges, etc. • Farm business planning • Barangay development planning focused on farm management • Seedling dispersal (durian, lanzones, mangga, rambutan, falcatta, mahogany)
MRDP
• Water supply and (goat dispersal, hog raising, chicken raising)
MINSSAD
• School building • Training for appropriate farming technology • Goat dispersal
CIDSS
• Financial assistance for banana production • Assistance for extension of day care center • Spring development
The Upland Communities: 64 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Non-Intervention Areas (NIAs): Barangay Level
The Non-Intervention Areas in Compostela Valley Province claimed that there has been
participatory community planning in the area in the last three years. The participatory
community planning include: planning the farm to market road and barangay hall com-
pletion.
Community plans being implemented are as follows: training for appropriate farming
technology, warehouse construction, farm to market road, electrification, health center
construction, and forest protection.
► Community Organizations in NIAs and their Roles
There are 10 community organizations with different levels of capacities in the area.
Community organizations have different roles in addressing community concerns, organ-
izational issues and/or individual concerns such as:
• Enhance the participation of women in community activities, provide trainingon live-lihood and entrepreneurial skills, and improve gender relations in the home and the community
• Promote unity and cooperation in the community • Livelihood enhancement • Maintain peace and order in the community • Spiritual upliftment • Share community problems and issues and discuss possible solutions • Promote unity among indigenous people • Monitor prices of farm products especially banana
According to informants and participants in the FGIs, community organizations initiated
the following activities in their respective areas:
• Maintenance of cleanliness of the barangay hall
The Upland Communities: 65 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• Training on livelihood enhancement • Training of diversification of sources of income such as handicraft making,
cooking and sewing • Regular patrol in the community to maintain peace and order • Construct meeting hall for the village • Meeting to discuss budget for the church activities • Participate in activities of the local government in the barangay and the
municipality
Similar to the IAs, some organizations and institutions are helping these areas by provid-
ing different forms of support/assistance:
• Local Government Units: Municipal/Provincial Levels • Air Force of the Philippines (AFP) • Department of Agriculture
► The LGU and its Role
The informants and the participants also outlined the services they received from the Mu-
nicipal LGU and the DA Staff:
• Participate in community meetings to provide inputs on appropriate farming technol-
ogy • Provide inputs on health care for livestock • Conduct training/seminar on appropriate farming systems • Conduct immunization of livestock • Provide fertilizer and seedlings • Monitor of government programs and projects • Promote sustainable agriculture (e.g. organic farming) • Discuss problems related to farming
► Types of Soil and Water Management in Relation to Degradation and Misuse of Natural Resources
The residents in the NIAs noted that different types of trees and crops were planted but in
terms of using farm inputs to increase farm productivity there is still much to be desired.
They also mentioned that, three years ago, potable water facilities were not readily avail-
The Upland Communities: 66 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
able and it took so much effort to fetch water. At present, there are four water facilities
that are installed and are functional in strategic locations with two reservoirs.
The problem of flooding is still mentioned in the area. Even if the rains are not too
heavy, flooding still occurs. However, they also brought up some factors that compound
the problems that they face and these are as follows:
• When the NPA movement was still active in the area, agencies working to protect the forest cannot reach the area. The reduction of the presence of the NPA encouraged agencies of government to work closely with upland communities in environmental protection resulting to the planting of trees.
• Lack of capital to invest in farm development, which will result to the improvement of soil and water conditions.
• Cutting of trees has affected the water supply in the area. • Level of environmental awareness was quite low before the year 2002. With in-
creased efforts to educate communities on environmental awareness, upland commu-nities started to address the threat to forest resources.
When asked what are the existing initiatives in the community to address environmental
problems, the answers they gave were as follows:
• Contour and diversified farming to improve and/or maintain soil fertility and prevent
soil erosion • Tree planting to improve soil condition and protect soil erosion • Tree planting near the water source to protect the water supply • Pass an ordinance preventing the cutting of trees to protect the forest • Protect the forest through tree planting
Assistance from agencies/stakeholders in the community are as follows:
DA
Seedling dispersal (forest and fruit trees) Animal dispersal (pig, chicken, carabao, cow)
DENR
Seedling dispersal (forest and fruit trees) Training/session: FTG (Farmer Training Group)
The Upland Communities: 67 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
LGU Infrastructure Health Livelihood enhancement
► LGU Services: Municipal LGU
• Monitor/survey agricultural development in the community • Disease prevention and care of livestock • Hands-on training on appropriate farming technology • Provide inputs on contour farming • Tree planting • Attend community meetings to assess the situation of upland farmers
Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas in Davao Oriental: Barangay Level Land Use Based Participatory Barangay Development Planning through LGU and Com-munity Capacity Building
Similar to the answer given by the Compostela Valley informants, both the IA and NIA claimed
that participatory community planning had been conducted in their area before the UDP Project
was introduced. Again, both IA and NIA did not indicate that land-use based participatory
barangay development planning through LGU was conducted.
Intervention Areas (IAs): Barangay Level
The Intervention Community (Barangay Level) in Davao Oriental Province claimed that
there has been participatory community planning processes conducted in the area in the
last three years. The participatory community planning include: the establishment of a
Barangay Development Plan, Infrastructure renovation – barangay hall, flood control,
honeycomb cemetery, concreting from the barangay hall to the National Highway and
road improvement, watershed development plan, and high school building construction.
The Upland Communities: 68 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Participatory community planning was initiated to address common problems in the
community such as the following: improvement of the barangay and to keep the commu-
nity updated about the priority projects in the barangay, improvement of the barangay
hall (which is already old), protect streams and rivers, quarterly assembly, to facilitate
transport of farm products to market, environmental protection, and to give opportunity
of the youth and children to go school, especially the poor.
The current activities of the IAs are:
• Barangay sessions, barangay assemblies with purok presidents, survey (actual) lec-tures
• Quarterly Barangay Development Council Meeting • General Assembly / Special General Assemblies • Information dissemination • Contour farming, tree planting and riverbank rehabilitation. Contour Farming has the
following as key players: UDP and Barangay Council Farmers. It is noted that others will not continue to do contouring because UDP could not provide the planting mate-rials. Farmers are waiting for the support from UDP.
• Bayanihan BOD meeting
Plans, which are now being implemented and assessment of implementation are also on
going, as follows:
• High School Building – finished and functional, other activities were done through bayanihan, but still lacking one building and teachers.
• Water system – completed but it cannot cater to the needs of the residents especially those residing at the barangay center because it is far from the source of water and the water from the source is not enough.
• Contour Farming – it is successful because most of the farmers cooperate and it is discussed during Barangay Council Meeting.
• Barangay Hall Renovation • Sustainable Agriculture – 90% is practicing SA based on the monitoring. • Barangay Forest Protection – this is on-going and funds were released for this project;
survey was completed.
► Community Organizations in IAs and Their Roles
There are 11 community organizations with different levels of capacities in the area.
Community organizations have different roles in addressing community concerns, organ-
izational issues and/or individual concerns such as:
The Upland Communities: 69 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• To increase income of members • For women’s organization -- to orient women to know their rights • To enjoy the benefits of working together • To operate a micro-finance project • To look into potable water needs of the community and provide water system to the
community • To improve the condition of the fisherfolk • To reforest the watershed area • To improve the living standard of the people • To improve status of women through gender and development initiatives
The people further identified the objectives and activities of community organizations ex-
isting and operating in their areas and the organizations supporting these organizations.
They are as follows:
1. Multi-purpose cooperative with the objective of augmenting income. This organiza-tion is supported by Landbank and the barangay. They undertook the following initia-tives/activities: • Money lending activities • Elementary school gate construction • Meetings
2. Women’s Association with the objectives of increasing income and for women to
recognize their rights. This is supported by the Municipal and Barangay Government, Office of the Congressman (congressional fund), and CIDDS. They undertook the following initiatives/activities: • Beautification • Fiesta organizing • Meetings • Women’s month celebration • Money lending activities • Establish flower nursery
3. Seniors’ Citizens’ Association with the objective of letting senior citizens avail of
benefits, to discuss concerns of senior citizens, and address some of their needs and concerns. This is supported by the Barangay and Municipal Local Government. They undertook the following initiatives/activities: • Beautification projects • Money-lending activities • Meetings
The Upland Communities: 70 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
4. Don Mariano Marcos Farmers’ Association with the objective of increasing income;
supported by DENR. They undertook the following initiatives/activities: • Tree planting • Processing for CBFM • Reforestation project
5. PWDEP – microfinance with support from the Barangay Development Council.
• Money lending activities
6. PINTAWASA – to address water needs and other gaps in basic needs of the commu-nity with support from the Barangay Development Council. • Initiated the move for households to have their own faucets
7. Fisherfolk (PINCOCO) – to improve status of living of fisherfolk; supported by the
Barangay Development Council (BDC) and ISFI of Ateneo de Davao. • Respond to needs of fisherfolk such as pumpboat
8. Pintatangan Forest Developers Association (PFDA) – for environmental protection
and reforestation in watershed areas; supported by DAR • Tree planting
9. PILMAPRIMCO – for environmental protection and reforestation in watershed areas;
supported by Barangay-LGU, Banay Banay and DENR-PENRO.
10. SIDUCCO – improve livelihoods; supported by Barangay-LGU and UDP. They un-dertook the following initiatives/activities: • Provision of seed/capital • Money lending • Cassava production • Nursery • Rubber production and mango puree production
11. Women’s Cooperative – to support women’s lives and livelihoods through gender
and development initiatives; supported by the Municipal Local Government Unit. They undertook the following initiatives/activities: • Meetings • Money lending activities
The people identified key players in the IAs in the development process and they are as follows:
• Barangay /Barangay Council • Municipal LGU
The Upland Communities: 71 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• Provincial Governor • DepED • UDP • Agriculture Technician • Barangay Extension Worker • Upland Barangay Association • Upland Community Association • Cooperative (SIDUCCO) • DENR
► The LGU and Its Role
The LGUs’ role in helping
the people have been
highlighted by the people
in this study. They
mentioned a number of
LGU services/activities
that the Municipal Level
LGU initiated and these are as follows:
• Seedling dispersal, calamity fund distribution • Giving information on agriculture-related activities • Conduct of seminars and trainings on new technologies on modern farming, monitor-
ing of livestock, and mango production • Inputs about farming systems, provision of seedlings, and encouragement of farmers
to plant fruit trees
They also itemized the help extended by the LGU, specifically from the DA Staff:
• Spearhead pest management and farm management • Assist and facilitate UDP Projects, give seedlings for fruit trees, and manage contour
farming • Assist in the organization of assembly meetings and People’s Day • Conduct seminars on contouring • Conduct contour monitoring and evaluation • Organize meetings
The Upland Communities: 72 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
The people further identified the types of support they expect from the government ulture which are as follows:
• Financing on farm production including livestock dispersal • More technicians to help farmers • Support construction of farm to market roads • Support for soil analysis, agri-technology guide on when and how to plant crops • Modern technology on farming and livestock • Seeds dispersal and provision of organic fertilizers
► Types of Soil and Water Management in Relation to Degradation and Misuse of Natural Resources
Less occurrence of the prevailing problems related to degradation and misuse of natural
resources was noted by informants when measures were adopted to help prevent or
minimize further destruction. One informant said that landslides and soil erosion were
heavy before compared to the years 2002-2004. Now, it is minimized because of tree
planting, monitoring of Forest Guards (Bantay Gubat), and contour farming.
They also noted the scarcity or the dwindling of water resource because of decades of
cutting forest trees. There was awareness of the problem that could be translated into ac-
tion that will prevent further destruction.
They noted that forest trees are denuded due to illegal logging or cutting of trees. With-
out sustainable livelihood activities, people will cut trees by illegal means to survive.
But they also indicated that measures are also being implemented to address the problem.
Illegal logging is minimized and forest protection policies are enforced because staff
from DENR are closely monitoring tree planting and IEC campaign, people no longer
practice the slash and burn farming and illegal cutting of trees.
The informants could very well identify known methods to maintain soil fertility, such as:
• Contour farming • Organic farming • Water and soil conservation
The Upland Communities: 73 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• Tree planting • Rubber production • Composting and not burning of farm/plant wastes
They also identified known methods to protect the soil from erosion:
• Hedgerows, contour farming • Tree planting • Intercropping • Adopt-A-frame (This is used in establishing contour lines.) • Mulching
They also identified known methods to protect water supply:
• Tree planting near source of water • Bamboo planting • Avoid cutting trees within 50 meter radius from the water source • Tree planting • Regular monitoring of water system and distribution for ready action on water leaking
and other problems that will affect water supply
The following are the environmental protection initiatives that are being practiced in the
community:
To enhance farm fertility
1, Contour farming 2. Organic farming 3. Soil and water conservation 4. Tree planting 5. Rubber production
To protect soil erosion
1. Hedgerows and contour farming 2. Contour farming and intercropping 3. Adopt A-Frame (This is the equipment used to establish contour lines.) 4. Mulching 5. Farming
To protect water supply
1. Plant trees near the water source
The Upland Communities: 74 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
2. Bamboo planting 3. Avoid cutting trees within 50 meter radius from the water source 4. Tree planting
To protect the forest
1. Regular monitoring to prevent illegal activities 2. Control/regulate cutting of trees 3. Avoid slash and burn farming (kaingin)
► Programs and Projects in IAs
Provincial Government
• The governor will release to the community P100,000 per year for the project.
UDP
• Seed dispersal (fruit trees) • Water systems in four sitios • Spring development for water supply • Presence of technicians • Farm tools • Fingerlings for fishponds • Lecture/inputs on farm management • Training/Seminar on modern farming • Goat raising
DENR
• Seedling dispersal
Calumnan Foundation • Tree planting SIDUCCO (Municipal) • Tree planting ISDRI • More on training and seminar on cooperative (micro-finance)
The Upland Communities: 75 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Non-Intervention Areas (NIAs): Barangay Level
The NIAs (Barangay Level) in Davao del Oriental Province claimed that there has been
participatory community planning processes conducted in the area in the last three years.
The participatory community planning include: establishment of 5-year Barangay Devel-
opment Plan, Renovation of Barangay Hall, Road maintenance (farm-to-market road),
Road filling (gravelling), and Solid waste management.
Participatory community planning was initiated to address common problems in the
community such as: enabling the community to plan systematically the right projects for
the barangay from the 20% barangay development fund, be able to prioritize a list of pro-
jects based on need, improve the image of the barangay hall by renovation, facilitate
transport of farm produce from farm to market, and environmental protection.
They identified the following as the current activities conducted by the community:
Establishment of 5-year Barangay Development Plan
• Barangay Development Council (BDC) meeting/consultation with purok presidents
and seminar on how to organize Barangay Development Plan in coordination with MPDC
Road maintenance (farm-to-market road)
• Board meeting with barangay officials (special session) and meeting with barangay
development council with purok president and general assembly
Road filling (gravelling)
• Meeting with barangay officials, meeting with BDC and general assembly
Solid waste management
• Special session with barangay council; IEC campaign for purok presidents; Collec-tion for garbage collectors (municipal)
The Upland Communities: 76 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Plans which are now being implemented and those assessed for implementation:
Road Maintenance (farm-to-market road)
Key Players: Barangay Officials, Purok Presidents, Municipal Government (infrastruc-ture committee)
Stage: Completed. On-going gravelling is done as maintenance activity
Assessment: This is on-going if planning process is maintained and the barangay cap-tain will still be in office.
There was a special session and a resolution was passed to the Sangguniang Bayan.
Electrification
Key Players: Barangay Council and Governor as the source of fund
Stage: Implementation Stage
Assessment: Successful if there is financial assistance This is integrated in the 5-year development plan. Water System (deep well)
Key Players: Barangay Council, Congressional fund and Governor’s Fund
Stage: Implemented
Assessment: Successful if people will cooperate
► Community Organizations in NIAs and their Roles
There are six community organizations with different levels of capacities in the area.
Community organizations have different roles in addressing community concerns, organ-
izational issues and/or individual concerns. They pursue different activities to be able to
meet their objectives. They are also assisted by organizations outside of the community
The Upland Communities: 77 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
working in partnership with these organizations by providing support. The organizations
are as follows:
1. Women’s Organization was organized to improve the status of women, their liveli-
hood and as partners of men in development. Its members regularly meet. They are into lending activities, livestock dispersal and other livelihood activities. They also participate in the Women’s Day Celebration. This organization is assisted by the Provincial Government (Governor) and LGU.
2. Parents’ and Teachers’ Community Association has the objective of providing
support to teachers for school improvement. The members meet regularly and cele-brate PTCA. Members meet for bayanihan every 1st Wednesday of the month to maintain cleanliness in the school grounds. There is no servicing organization out-side of the community who provide assistance.
3. Community-Based Forest Management is organized to assist upland dwellers in
livelihood activities. DENR is providing support to this organization.
4. IFMA has its aim of reforesting the denuded forest area. They distribute and plant seedlings. DENR is providing support to this organization.
5. Ad Jesum Incorporated – to assist upland families. They are into money lending
activities. The members regularly meet for updating of activities. There is no servic-ing organization outside of the community who provide assistance.
6. Senior Citizens’ Group was organized for senior citizen to avail of benefits. They
participate in tree planting. LGU is providing support to this group.
► The LGU and Its Role
The following are the LGU Services/Activities initiated by the Municipal LGU:
Municipal staff are involved in seminars on cassava production, provide seedlings to
farmers (sometimes), and monitor tree planting activities and livestock dispersal.
DA Staff monitor livestock dispersal (9 heads of cows dispersed), provide seedlings to
farmers, and give training on corn production and tree planting.
The Upland Communities: 78 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
The people also reported that with regard to agri-related problems, they approached the
DA staff. As to the type of support they expect from the government related to agricul-
ture, they mentioned the following:
• Support for contour farming, vegetableseeds and fruit tree seedlings • Support for livestock such as goat raising because people do not have money to buy
livestock • Training on pest management
► Types of Soil and Water Management in Relation to Degradation and Misuse of Natural Resources.
The informants noted that soil erosion is a problem the during rainy season. The top soil
is washed away by rain. The soil easy dries up even after only few a days without rain.
They also noted that the water source was never a problem before. As to the forest, it has
been denuded a long time already. There is no change up to this time according to the in-
formants.
They identified the known methods to maintain soil fertility
• Contour farming • Use of fertilizer (14-14-14) • Organic farming • Mulching • Treeplanting
As to the known methods to protect soil erosion, they identified contour farming and tree
planting.
As to the known methods to protect water supply, they mentioned the following:
• Tree planting near the water source • Report leaking pipes • Regular cleaning of reservoir • Avoid throwing garbage
The known methods to protect the forest are as follows:
The Upland Communities: 79 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• Treeplanting by every couple • No cutting of trees (P500 penalty)
The methods of environmental protection being practiced by the community are as fol-lows:
To enhance/maintain farm fertility:
• Contour farming • Use of fertilizer • Treeplanting
To prevent soil erosion:
• Treeplanting • Contouring
To protect water supply:
• plant trees (mahogany) near the water source • report leaking pipes immediately and general cleaning of reservoir • proper garbage disposal
To protect the forest:86
• not yet protected • avoid kaingin • no cutting trees because there is no forest around
Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas in Davao del Sur: Barangay Level Land Use Based Participatory Barangay Development Planning through LGU and Com-munity Capacity Building
The Intervention Areas in Davao del Sur Province claimed that there has been participatory
community planning in the area in the last three years. The participatory community planning
include: barangay hall, lupon building, fiesta sports, school building, multi-purpose building,
farm to market road, savings and loan, leadership training, PIME (project implementation, moni-
The Upland Communities: 80 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
toring and evaluation), Bayanihan Dagyaw system, continuing education, water system and
spring development, and livelihood project.
Participatory community planning was initiated to address common problems in the community
such as: to provide better working conditions for barangay officials, to provide outpost for CVO,
meaningful celebration in the barangay, improve farming practices, improve status of women
and gender relations, project monitoring, acquire other skills and knowledge, and facilitate com-
munity work and undertakings, among others.
Intervention Areas (IAs): Barangay Level
► Community Organizations in IAs and Their Roles
There are 11 community organizations with different levels of capacities in the area.
Community organizations have different roles in addressing community concerns, organ-
izational issues and/or individual concerns such as:
• Spiritual upliftment and growth in Christian faith • Improved situation of the community • Literacy for children living away from school • Training on gender relations and women empowerment • Cooperative development • Micro-Finance • Establish 5-year development plan • Savings and Loan • Death aid • Riverbank stabilization
According to the informants and participants in the data gathering process, community
organizations initiated the following activities in the area:
• Bible sharing in the household • Prayer meeting • Community meeting or assembly / Organizational meeting or assembly • Establish development plans • Encourage children to go to school • Leadership training sessions • Marketing
The Upland Communities: 81 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• Treeplanting • Savings and Loan • Plant bamboos
The following were also identified as entities that provided support and assistance to the
community:
• Local Government Units • LGU / UDP / DENR
► The LGU and Its Role
The LGU was identified as a prime mover of development activities. Together with the UDP project, its personnel assisted in the following areas:
• Monitoring of bamboos and trees • Meetings • Conduct trainings • Technical assistance on farming systems development • Emergency meeting • Distribution of seedlings and animal dispersal • Monitoring of irrigation systems in the banana plantation
The DA (LGU devolved personnel) also arranged meetings and seminars. When people
need technical assistance in the area of farming systems, they approached the following
people:
• Municipal technician • DA technician • UDP personnel/technician
They identified the following as the types of assistance or support they need from the
government:
• Technical expertise • Training and Seminar • Seedlings • Farm Management
The Upland Communities: 82 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• Livestock Management • Livelihood project / enhancement
► Types of Soil and Water Management in Relation to Degradation and Misuse of Natural Resources
The people in the IAs noticed an
improvement in soil fertility and water
supply/quality in the years 2002-2004.
The reasons they gave are as follows:
For Soil
• The soil condition is much better
now compared to before. This is because of the inputs (technical assistance) from UDP such as practicing contour farming, prohibiting the practice of burning of plant wastes, and stopping the practice of the cutting of trees.
• Soil erosion has been minimized because of contour establishment, tree planting, and the “no cutting of trees” practice.
• Application of fertilizer because of poor soil condition
For Water
• Water quality is better compared to the years before 2002. This because riverbanks are planted with trees.
• Because of spring development, water from rivers and streams will not overflow be-cause of the trees planted.
• No more cutting of trees
Forest
• As seen by the greening of the area due to reforestation • Presence of the forest guards who protect the forest
► Programs and Projects in the IAs
The Upland Communities: 83 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
They identified the following as the specific programs and projects that have extended
assistance in their respective areas:
UDP
• Training / Seminar: Livelihood projects (goat raising, loan) • Spring Development • Small Infrastructure Projects: footbridge, road construction and maintenance, foot
trail • Seedlings • Water system
KAPWA
• Technical Assistance in upland development and provision of materials • Training and Seminar
BEAM LIFE
• Education • Livelihood
TABANG MINDANAO
• Spring development
Non-Intervention Areas (NIAs): Barangay Level
The non-intervention areas in Davao del Sur claimed that there has been participatory
community planning in the area in the last three years. The participatory community
planning include: road rehabilitation, seminar on savings and loan group, peace and or-
der, request for operation “tuli” (circumcision), program of activities for fiesta, status of
land tenure instrument of 350 has., and barangay roads.
The main purpose of participatory community planning: to inform the community of
programs and projects, for organizations to meet and contribute funds for the organiza-
tion every week, peace and order in the area, to circumcise the children in the commu-
The Upland Communities: 84 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
nity, work together to plan a program of activities during fiesta celebration, plan to secure
tenurial security for upland dwellers, barangay road construction and maintenance.
They identified the following as the current activities in the community:
• Barangay assemblies • Seminar/Orientation in organizing cooperative • Sports environment • Road maintenance • DENR survey to process tenurial security
The following are the key players in the community as identified by informants and par-
ticipants in the data gathering process:
• LGU • Military • Barangay Council • Barangay folks
► Community Organizations in NIAs and Their Roles
There are nine community organizations with different levels of capacities in the area.
Community organizations have different roles in addressing community concerns, organ-
izational issues and/or individual concerns such as:
• To implement livelihood projects • To request medicines for the health center • To strengthen IP organization • Savings mobilization • Savings to generate revolving fund which will be used as credit fund at low interest
for the members • Livelihood • Unity and cooperation
Community organizations undertake the following activities in the area:
• Undertake quarterly / monthly meetings • Conduct municipal activities • Represent the barangay in meetings at the municipality and tribal day
The Upland Communities: 85 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• Organize assembly meetings • Conduct skills training • Organize a yearly meeting
They also noted that the Municipal Staff performed the following:
• Attend barangay session • Monitor UDP-LGU program • Conduct information dissemination • Initiate relief distribution when calamity occurs (provision of 3-kilo rice per family)
The DA Staff were seen to have conducted artificial insemination for goats, cows and
carabaos.
When they needed technical assistance they said that they would approach the municipal
staff or DA staff.
When asked what type of assistance do they expect in the area of agriculture from agen-
cies of government. They identified the following as the most urgent:
• Loan for agricultural production (to purchase fertilizer, planting materials, seedlings) • To provide technical advice to improve farm management practices • Provision of fertilizer and seedlings (planting materials) by the barangay council
► Types of Soil and Water Management in Relation to Degradation and Misuse of Natural Resources
The residents have observed the poor soil fertility because upland dwellers are using
chemical fertilizers. As to water, it is available but it cannot service the demand for water
by all residents of the sitio with the three water systems developed in three puroks. Water
supply is not sufficient especially during dry season. One factor is the lack of water res-
ervoir. They also noted the denudation of the forest due to indiscriminate cutting of trees.
The residents mentioned that they can maintain soil fertility by practicing diversified
farming system and appropriate farm management (such as cleaning the farm properly).
The Upland Communities: 86 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
To protect soil erosion they suggested treeplanting both forest species and fruit bearing
trees. As to the protection of water supply, again they mentioned treeplanting and pro-
hibit the cutting of trees. When it comes to protecting the forest, they again mentioned
prohibiting cutting of trees, plant trees, as well as stop the slash and burn practice or “ka-
ingin.”
The following are the organizations identified by the residents who are active in envi-
ronmental protection and the other activities they undertake:
MAFAMCO • Savings and credit coop • Solar dryer and Goat
Women’s Organization • Swine production
Senior Citizens’ Group • 20% discount for medicines
SLG • Savings and credit group (UDP)
DFS • Training on actual contour establishment
UCO • Upland Community Organization
Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas in the Sarangani Province: Barangay Level Land Use Based Participatory Barangay Development Planning through LGU and Com-munity Capacity Building
Even before the UDP Project started, both the IAs and NIAs claimed that participatory commu-
nity planning has been conducted in the last five years.
Intervention Areas (IAs): Barangay Level
The Upland Communities: 87 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
After the project, the stakeholders in the IAs in the Sarangani Province claimed that par-
ticipatory community planning has been conducted in the area in the last three years.
They identified some projects and activities that made plans through participatory plan-
ning and these include the following:
• “Bayanihan” or collective voluntary work to clean the water reservoir to be able to
ensure that water is clean • “Araw sa Sitio” for the community to enjoy. Meetings were conducted to plan the af-
fair. The activities include amateur contest, and search for Miss Sitio Katupan • Sports activities for the community to enjoy such as basketball tournament, amateur
singing contest, discos, volleyball, singing contest and horse fighting. • Tubod and Training Center to have a comfortable venue for meetings and other ac-
tivities which were funded by UDP. A bayanihan was conducted. • Bayanihan system was planned and organized to facilitate farmwork. Land prepara-
tion is usually done through bayanihan • Nursery for abaca with the purpose of providing planting materials for abaca produc-
tion by the members of the cooperative and minimize diseases of abaca. Activities for the nursery establishment were conducted such as land preparation, fencing, se-cure planting materials.
• Child friendly barangay to prevent child abuse and provide school supplies to poor families and also assist in the issuance of birth certificates. The activities conducted were: Children’s Congress, King and Queen Contest and distributing school supplies.
• Cleaning of the Road and School to properly maintain the road and assist the school administrator in cleaning the school building, school grounds and classrooms. A ba-yahinan was conducted.
• Watershed Project to conserve water and improve water quality. On-going activities on tree planting and contour farming.
• Contour System Barangay Ordinance to control soil erosion. On-going activities on contour establishment and tree planting.
When people were asked if these plans are being implemented at present. The answer
they gave are as follows:
• Child Friendly which has been initiated by the Barangay Local Government. This is on-going or currently being implemented.
• Training Seminar organized by DSWD and Local Government. This project has just been started. But, the project lacks funding and support.
• Nursery Establishment is initiated by UBA Cooperative. This is on-going at its 2nd stage of implementation.
The Upland Communities: 88 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• Training Center which is initiated by UDP and Barangay Upper Dumabat. The pro-ject is at its initial stage. They are gathering lumber for the construction. The project is proceeding quite well because of community support with assistance from UDP.
• Contour Farming initiated by UDP and Barangay Council. This is implemented. Most of the sloping farm areas were contoured. This is operational and on-going. The community was convinced of the benefits of contour farming.
• Protected Area Watershed initiated by UDP and Barangay Council. It is already im-plemented. This is operational and on-going. Community is aware of the benefits of watershed protection.
• Child Friendly initiated by Municipal LGU, barangay LGU and DSWD. A barangay ordinance was issued, and is already implemented. This is being implemented. One case of child abuse was already reported to DSWD.
• Malaria Prevention by DOH and Barangay Officials. It is being implemented. There were 120 households provided with medicines. This is effective if each family will use the mosquito nets provided to them to control malaria and dengue.
► The LGU and its Role
The informant/participants acknowledged that the LGU played an important role in their
community’s development. They identified the services the LGU provided and activities
it initiated. They are as follows:
• Provide planting materials • Monitor farming operations to check problems related to farming • Initiate the DFS Survey • Monitor health status of livestock • Monitor the status of the assistance provided to farmers • Provide inputs on farming operations • Monitor the community to avoid kaingin and cutting of trees • Monitor the types of problems affecting the farmers • Initiated the survey of the learning site • Inform the barangay of incoming activities initiated outside the barangay • Conduct meetings, training and seminars
The LGU further extended assistance through the services given by the devolved DA
Staff. The DA staff provided the following services:
• Monitor if any livestock is affected by diseases • Give seminar • Provide inputs on appropriate technology in farming
The Upland Communities: 89 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• Provide expertise/technical assistance in pest management and farm management
When asked what type or kind of support would they need from the government in terms
of agricultural-related services, the answer they gave were as follows:
• New methods/technology in farming and provide free planting materials and compost
fertilizer (organic) • Provide support by giving planting materials for corn, rice or financial assistance for
farming or livelihood support on livestock such as goat dispersal • New farming technology, seedlings and farm tools
► Community Organizations in IAs and Their Roles
The blossoming of upland community organizations was quite noticeable in the interven-
tion areas in Sarangani Province. The strengthening of communities through organiza-
tional development is an area that was embraced in the intervention areas. The following
organizations were identified in the areas. Some were formed during the implementation
of the UDP while others were already established and were further strengthened.
1. UBA (Upland Barangay Association). The purpose of this to organization is improve
appropriate technology for upland development and forest protection. Activities un-dertaken include: meetings, seminars, study tour (lakbay aral), treeplanting and field trip. Linkages to the following organizations: UDP/DA, FIDA, DTI-TESDA, and Rural Bank.
2. UCO (Upland Community Organization) was organized to improve farming technol-ogy. Activities undertaken include: meetings, seminars, and treeplanting. Linkages to the following organizations: UDP/DA and FIDA
3. CBFM (Community-Based Forest Management) is to protect the forest and other natural resources. Activities undertaken include: meetings and tree planting. Link-ages to DENR.
4. WINDS to educate the women in areas of health, sanitation and family health care. Activities undertaken include: meetings, cooking, seminar, herbal medicine prepara-tions. Linkages to the following organizations: DSWD with Barangay LGU and DOH.
5. PNP Coop is aimed to improve personal hygiene and peace and order. Activities un-dertaken: duty and patrol in the barangay by rotation. Linkages to UDP and DA.
6. Nagmabaul (Nagkahiusa Mag-uuma sa Barangay Upper Lumabot) to avail of gov-ernment services and programs through UDP. Activities undertaken include: meet-ings and seminars on new technology. Linkage to LGU.
The Upland Communities: 90 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
7. ILO was organized to provide assistance to IPs especially in livelihood enhancement (farming). Activities undertaken include: meetings, seminars, fieldwork such as ag-riculture field trip. Linkage to LGU.
8. SACAPDA (Sangkayaw, Abgang bato, Campao Patban Datl Bulol Association). The purpose is to improve standard of living. Activities undertaken include: board meet-ings, assembly, regular meetings, training and seminars. Linkage to UDP-LGU
9. SCFO for the coconut farmers. Activities undertaken: meetings, seminars and train-ing. No linkages.
10. Jeepney Drivers Motor Organization to better understanding among drivers and better service to the public. Meetings had been conducted. No linkages.
► Types of Soil and Water Management in Relation to Degradation and Misuse of
Natural Resources
Some people noted that the soil is very poor and cannot give good produce because the
top soil which is fertile was washed away. However, a number noted that contoured
farms are getting good produce because top soil erosion is prevented. The planting of
trees for the people made a difference. They pointed out that for trees planted near
streams and rivers, the change that has been noticed is that the soil is not washed away
because of the trees planted. The areas without trees are now being planted with trees
and planting of bamboos and trees along riverbanks and streams is encouraged. Indeed,
there was a strong feeling that it is different now because of contour farming. The farm-
ers are being careful to preserve the soil so that it is not washed away. Farmers are be-
coming aware of the dangers of soil erosion.
Soil Conservation
The informants/participants of the study identified known methods being practiced by the
community to maintain soil fertility. They pointed out that they are practicing DFS (Di-
versified Farming System) and contour farming; they will not use commercial/chemical
fertilizer, and they refrain from burning trees and plant wastes. To protect soil erosion,
they said that they will plant trees in sloping areas and practice contour farming.
Water Conservation
The people pointed out that nowadays, the water source is near. UDP provided assistance
in the construction of water reservoir. They claimed that there are trees planted in areas
which were barren before, with the help of the UDP project. Nowadays, they emphasized
The Upland Communities: 91 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
that the source of water will not dry up unlike before that the water level will drop, espe-
cially during summer time. Trees are planted near water sources, riverbanks and beside
streams. Today, water supply is no longer a problem.
The known method they identified that is being practiced to protect the water supply is
the planting of trees near the water source and not cutting trees.
Forest
People noted that planting of new trees is being done. In some IAs, forest areas are ex-
panding. Cutting of trees is prohibited and forest monitoring by CBFM members is done
regularly to check.
Because of the planting, people also observed that the surrounding area is getting cooler.
Cutting of trees near the water reservoir is strictly prohibited through a barangay ordi-
nance with assistance from UDP. Thus, more planting of trees is being done in protected
sites. Community residents are actively planting different types of trees, both forest trees
and fruit trees.
► Programs and Projects in the IAs
Several programs/projects are initiated
in the IAs and some forms of
assistance are extended by
agencies/stakeholders implementing
these programs and projects in the
community. The programs and
projects they identified with the
activities and assistance are as follows:
UDP
• Spring development • Road rehabilitation
The Upland Communities: 92 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• Footbridge • Livelihood • Seedlings • Education • Training/Seminars • Infrastructure projects such as road rehabilitation • Water systems • Farm-to-market road • Technology • Watershed • Savings (RFS 83,000)
MUNONG EL
• Goat and chicken dispersal
HPI (Heifer Project International
• Goat, chicken and cow dispersal
Sarangani - Non-Intervention Community Barangay Level:
People answered that participatory community planning has been conducted in the past
three years. But there was not much articulation on the said process. They, however,
gave examples of activities that involved participatory planning. They identified some
projects that made plans through the participatory process which area as follows:
• Electrification or energization of the community. As an activity in relation to this
project, they passed a resolution to the Municipal Government but until now there is no action about it.
• Road maintenance so that vehicles can travel during rainy days/season or even during dry season and to make the community accessible. Road maintenance was done through “bayanihan.” A resolution was passed regarding road maintenance but has not yet been implemented.
• Corn production to improve harvest. A training was conducted by DA on corn pro-duction but implementation is a problem because of the lack of capital for farm pro-duction.
When asked if the plans are being implemented at present, the responses they gave are as
follows:
The Upland Communities: 93 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• Plan for corn production initiated by DA, but it is not yet implemented because farm-ers do not have the capital to finance corn production.
• Road maintenance initiated by the Barangay Council. Only 5% is accomplished be-cause there is no funding.
• Bayanihan initiated by a Sitio Leader. This is being implemented and has again proven that working together is effective.
► The LGU and its Role
The people noted the role that the LGU played in their community’s development. They further identified the services and activities the LGU initiated:
• Introduction of new farming technology • Immunization of livestock • Deworming of livestock • Artificial insemination for carabao
The staff of DA (devolved) also extended which is considered as also from the LGU.
They identified the following forms of assistance:
• Immunization of animals/livestock • De-worming • Artificial insemination
When asked what type/kind of support they feel they need from the government agricul-
tural support services, they answered, “Provision of fertilizers and planting materials
(such as corn seeds and vegetables).”
► Community Organizations in NIAs and Their Roles The following are the community organizations present in the non-intervention areas:
• GKK (Gagmay nga Kristohanong Katilingban) was organized by the Roman Catholic Church for peace and spiritual advancement. Activities include: meetings, holy mass, bible sharing and bayahinan. No linkages with outside organizations.
• Farmers’ Association was organized to create an atmosphere of cooperation among farmers. Activities undertaken: meetings and program. Linkage with LGU-Municipal.
The Upland Communities: 94 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• WINDS (Women in Development in Sarangani) to educate women in the area of live-lihood. Activities include meetings and training such as pedicure, manicure and dressmaking). Linkages with DSWD / DA.
• RIC (Rural Improvement Club) organized for livelihood enhancement. Activities in-clude poultry and communal garden. Linkage with DA.
• SCFO to develop the planters. Activities undertaken: meetings and seminars. Link-age with DA.
► Types of Soil and Water Management in Relation to Degradation and Misuse of Natural Resources
When people were asked the following questions: What changes had been noticed in the
recent years about soil fertility, water and forest resources in the years 2002-2004? What
do think are the main reasons for these changes? What methods do you know that would
help? Which of these methods are generally practiced by the community now? The an-
swers they gave are as follows:
Soil
• Before, the soil in the uplands was fertile because people will not make kaingin. Now,
there are landslides and flooding. This is the effect of cutting trees, and kaingin for livelihood. There are no more trees to prevent soil erosion.
• The area is not fertile (umaw na kayo). Inappropriate farming practices resulted to soil erosion.
The known methods being practiced to maintain soil fertility are: 1) crop rotation, 2) fal-
low - to let the farm rest for two years and then resume the farming after two years, and
3) contour farming. But, crop rotation and non-cultivation for two years are not being
practiced. Contour farming is being practiced. To protect soil erosion, the known
method is treeplanting and this is being practiced by only three households in the area.
Water
It was pointed out by the informants/participants that water was a problem before because
there was no reservoir. Fetching water was difficult because the water source is very far.
A reservoir was donated by the Business Resource Center (BRC). This enabled people to
The Upland Communities: 95 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
save time and effort in fetching water from the source. However, water level in the
streams in the last three months was low because there was no rain in the past months.
The known method they identified to alleviate the problem was raised by someone who
said: “Ang bukid dili kalbohon. Walay watershed. (The mountain should not be left de-
nuded. There is no watershed.) The people also noted that there is no method being
practiced to protect water supply.
Forest
The informants/participants observed that the forest is denuded unlike before because
people are farming in what used to be forest area. There are lesser trees in the forest
compared before because people cut down trees in forest areas.
They noted the following known methods to protect the forest: treeplanting, prohibiting
the cutting of trees as well as the practice of “slash and burn” farming. However, nothing
has been done to protect the forest.
The Business Resource Center was identified as an institution that provided facilities
such as water reservoir, warehouse (bodega for products), sheller and dryer.
Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas in the South Cotabato Province: Baran-
gay Level
Land Use Based Participatory Barangay Development Planning through LGU and Com-munity Capacity Building
Intervention Area: Barangay Level
The informants/participants noted that the communities in the IAs has conducted partici-
patory community planning in the last three years. They identified a number of projects
and activities that implemented participatory planning processes, namely:
1. Road maintenance to properly maintain the road. The activities conducted include
bulldozing and gravel filling.
The Upland Communities: 96 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
2. Purchase of medicine for the barangay. Residents can ask for medicines for free. 3. Supplemental feeding for malnourished children. Feeding has been conducted for
children 5 years and below. 4. Bayanihan system to clean the community. Cleaning in public places was conducted. 5. Seedlings requests for Agro-Forestry to reforest the area (3 x 2.5 = 7.5 kms). Tree-
planting was conducted. 6. Reforestation for environmental protection. The UDP beneficiaries in three puroks
are planting trees. 7. Livelihood for income enhancement. Goat raising and duck raising were initiated. 8. Watershed project 50m around the watershed area so that the water level in the area
will not be reduced. Treeplanting of fruit trees is on-going. 9. Perimeter survey of 1000 hectares to protect participants of UDP. Treeplanting along
the perimeter was initiated.
When asked if plans are being implemented at present, the answers they gave are as fol-
lows:
• Livelihood initiated by UDP. This is on-going to expand the reach of the project. • Agro-forestry with UDP as key player. Trees are planted and weeding is on-going to
clean the areas, and in order that weeds will not compete with the growing trees. • Bayanihan system initiated by barangay officials and community residents. This is
done yearly. • Water system 50m away from the source of water by UDP/LGU. Fully implemented.
Treeplanting will be continued because there is an association and monthly dues are collected.
• Perimeter 1000 has – 50% of trees planted by UDP/LGU was able to survive. Fully implemented. Monitoring team from DA/LGU-Municipal and Barangay to check the status of the project
• Road maintenance by the UDP-LGU to facilitate transport of products and facilitate movement of people. Gravelling on the roads was done.
► The LGU and Its Role
The following are the activities that the people felt the LGU did:
• Monitoring of project beneficiaries • Meetings • Information drive
The Upland Communities: 97 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
When asked what type/kind of support do they need from the government agricultural
support services, the answers given are as follows:
• Support to procure planting materials because DA provided very limited planting ma-
terials • Appropriate farming techniques to increase farm production
► Community Organizations in IAs and Their Roles
The following organizations are present in the intervention areas:
1. UBA (Upland Barangay Association) was organized to develop the upland farmers. Activities undertaken were: meetings, seminars and treeplanting. Linkages with UDP/LGU.
2. UCO (Upland Community Organization) was organized for peace and order. Activi-ties undertaken: keeping peace and order in the community. Linkage with LGU.
3. PERLAS Coop to help the farmers. Activities undertaken: meetings, seminar and other activities in the barangay government. Linkages with DA/LGU.
► Types of Soil and Water Management in Relation to Degradation and Misuse of Natural Resources
What changes have been noticed in the recent years about soil fertility, water and forest
in the years 2002-2004?
Soil
When it comes to changes in the soil, people noted that there are changes because soil is
not anymore fertile. Fertilizer is required to be able to harvest enough. The known
methods to maintain farm/soil fertility is for farmers not to burn farm and plant wastes.
The known methods being practiced by the community to protect soil erosion is contour
farming. It is practiced in areas covered by UDP.
Water
The Upland Communities: 98 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
At present, there is already potable water in the IA that was initiated by UDP and Baran-
gay Project on water system. Treeplanting and prohibiting the cutting of trees are known
methods of water conservation.
Forest
The people noted that there are more trees in the forest because of the UDP Agro-forestry
project. To protect the forest, fire prevention should be implemented by puroks so that
residents will not start fire in the forest such as kaingin and burning of farm wastes.
► Forms of Assistance from Agencies/Stakeholders in the Community
UDP
• Livelihood, seedlings and loan • Training/Seminars (educational tours) • Leadership Training • Sustainable development
DA
• Counterpart support from the LGU (financial and technical)
DENR
• Counterpart; seedlings and trainings
Non-Intervention Areas (NIAs): Barangay Level
The following projects made plans through participatory processes:
1. Women’s livelihood to provide opportunity for women to earn an income. UDP pro-vided training on stuff toy making, pedicure, manicure and smacking pillows.
2. Garlan making for Grade 6 students as income for students. Garlan making was initi-ated.
The Upland Communities: 99 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
3. Family Health Care (RHU) to prevent diseases. An assembly was conducted and in-spection of houses was done every month. Toilet bowls were distributed for free to the community residents.
4. Water System because the barangay center has no water system. Resolution was submitted to the municipal government.
5. Project proposal presentation to assist the IPs. Orientation/seminar on project pro-posal was conducted.
When asked whether plans are implemented at present, they gave the following answers:
• Livelihood was initiated by DENR. This is fully implemented. As assessed, there
was no expansion of the livelihood activities because the farmers were not able to im-plement very well.
• Presentation of Financial Statement by Barangay Council. This is done every year. As assessed – as long as there is SMI (Saguittarius Mining Corporation) this will con-tinue.
• Family Health Care by DOH/Health. Fully implemented. As per assessment, if health issues are not addressed and everyone will be careless about cleanliness and health, dengue will recur.
► The LGU and its Role
The following services and activities rendered by the LGU were identified by the people:
• Monitoring of livelihood projects provided by UDP • Vaccination of livestock • Information dissemination – example training/meetings • Lecture on how to prevent the growth of weeds that will compete with the crops
The devolved DA staff provided the following activities as well:
• Vaccination of livestock • Monitoring of and asking farmers about agri-related problems. • Conduct seminar
When asked what type/kind of support do they need from the government agricultural
support services, they identified the following:
• Farm financing
The Upland Communities: 100 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• Training sessions on appropriate farming techniques to learn new technology and im-prove farming practices
• Assistance on farm inputs with easy terms of payment
► Community Organizations in NIAs and Their Roles The following organizations are present in the non-intervention areas:
• Women’s Organization. The purpose is to educate women about livelihood and fam-ily health. Activities include: handicraft making (smacking, pedicure and manicure), meetings, treeplanting, cleaning the community. Linkages with DSWD/DOH.
• SIAK DSWD was organized for livelihood enhancement. Activities include: train-ing, seminar and loan assistance. Linkage with DSWD.
• TRIAMCO (Triangle Multi-Purpose Cooperative). Purpose is to organize a coopera-tive. Activities include: meetings, forest tree- planting and fruit tree planting. No linkages.
• TACLANDAS (Tablu Christian Land Association). Purpose is to organize a coopera-tive. Activities include: meetings, forest tree- planting and fruit tree planting. Link-age with DSWD.
► Types of Soil and Water Management in Relation to Degradation and Misuse of Natural Resources
Soil
People noted that at present, there are no more landsides. Only those areas not planted
with trees have occurrence of landslides. Landslides were prevented because of planting
of forest trees in sloping areas and planting fruit trees in flatlands. Soil is not fertile be-
cause of denudation and topsoil was washed away.
Water
There is a good source of potable water in a particular sitio. In the past, this water source
was not identified.
Forest
The Upland Communities: 101 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Mountains are denuded. There are not so many forest trees compared before because
people cut down trees and made kaingin, and IPs converted the forest to farm areas and
trees.
To protect the forest, kaingin has to be stopped and the cutting of trees should be prohib-
ited. Only 20% of the IPs are planting trees and there are people assigned to monitor ka-
ingin and cutting of trees.
The Upland Communities: 102 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
This section presents the summary of the findings of the “before and after” condition of upland
areas studied at the community level.
The UDP is one of the attempts to address upland problems. Its primary aim is to develop a rep-
licable model to sustain the upland resource base and improve the living standards and prosperity
of upland communities. Its six-component approach constitute the following: community devel-
opment, institutional development and extension, resource management, sustainable agriculture
development, rural financial services, marketing and enterprise development, and agricultural
infrastructure support.
The community level data were generated using different approaches, namely, the Focus Group
Interview (FGI), interview with key informants and review of secondary data, namely the baran-
gay profile and other existing records. A total of 29 communities (19 from the IAs and 10 from
the NIAs) was covered for the community level component of the study. It has to be noted that
the community in this case refers to the barangay where either the intervention at the sitio level is
being implemented or the control barangay wherein no intervention is implemented in any of its
sitio.
In the light of the study schema, the following data were presented: demographic data, accessi-
bility of community, communication, economic status, services, other infrastructures, community
plans, community organizations, children in school, community health, food security, agricul-
tural support services, natural resource management, external support programs, land tenure,
non-farm enterprises, savings and loans, and remittances.
Summary and Implications of Findings
The Upland Communities: 103 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Summary
Community Level Research Findings: A Summary
Demographic Data
• Intervention Areas (IAs) in the ‘before’ condition and at present are more densely popu-lated than the Non-Intervention Areas (NIAs). Nonetheless, the number of households in both IAs and NIAs dramatically increased through the years.
• The majority of the residents in both IAs and NIAs are Cebuano or Visayan migrants. Even in 2000 (‘before’ condition), the Cebuano still occupied the bulk of the population thus, Cebuano or Bisaya is the dialect commonly spoken by the people then and now.
• Until the present, Roman Catholicism is still the dominant religion in both the IAs and NIAs.
• The economy in both the IAs and NIAs is agriculture-based as farming is the most com-mon source of income before and at present. The top three major crops planted in both IAs and NIAs include coconut, corn, and banana.
• The NIAs have been growing bananas even before 2000 but the IAs instead grew abaca during those years. It is only after 2000 when the IAs learned to adopt the trend. Nonethe-less, the number of households producing banana at present is relatively higher in the IAs than the NIAs.
Accessibility of Communities
Distance, Travel Time, and Focal Point of Trading
• The single motor or skylab is the principal means of transportation for both areas before and after intervention. This has increased as the means of transportation in the IAs but decreased in the NIAs. The second most popular means are PUJ/Truck/Tricycle for the NIAs and horse/carabao for the IAs.
• The focal point of trading for the barangay for both IAs (47.1%) and NIAs (36.4%) in the ‘before’ and ‘after’ condition was at the municipal center. However, a slight decrease in the percentage was evident in both areas at the present. For the NIAs, other municipal-ity/city/province (30%) emerged and was ranked number 1, similar to that of the munici-pal center.
• Even at present, the cost of transporting a sack of corn to the nearest trading center is relatively higher in the IAs (at an average of P 82.90) than the NIAs (at an average of P 30.50). While there is a significant increase in the cost per sack to be transported from the IAs (from an average of P49.90) there is an apparent decline in the NIAs (from an aver-age of 32.90).
The Upland Communities: 104 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• It takes a longer time to reach the municipal center from the NIAs than from the IAs by motorbike during the dry season ‘before’ and ‘after’ intervention. In the ‘before’ condi-tion, it however took longer time to reach the municipal center from the IAs during the wet season compared to the NIAs but the process again reverses in the ‘present’ condi-tion.
• It takes a longer time to reach both communities during the wet season than during the dry season be it by motorcycle or by foot in both 2000 and at present.
• The responsibility for maintaining the road trail from the sitio to the barangay in the ‘be-fore’ condition rests on the barangay government or barangay officials as commented by the NIAs while the IAs answered that it rests on the people through voluntary work. At present (‘after’ condition) a great majority of the IAs have come in concordance with the NIAs.
Accessibility of Communication Facilities
• Both IAs and NIAs do not have access to telephone lines for the ‘before’ and at present
condition. • The number of households who have access to television was comparatively higher in the
IAs than in the NIAs at present condition. • Access to radio is also evident in the both IAs and NIAs in the present condition. News-
broadcasting, among other radio programs, was the most frequent tuned in to in both of the areas although the preference is slightly higher in the IAs (72.2%) than the NIAs (60%).
• The mobile phone phenomenon has reached both the IAs and NIAs but the former have a higher average number of people who own one at 367 than the latter at 47.7.
Economic Status of the Households
• Both areas, the IAs and NIAs in the ‘before’ and at present data claimed that there are
poor households in their communities. • The ‘before’ data showed that there are more poor households in the IAs (an average of
375 households) than in the NIAs (an average of 235 households) and the figures in-creased in the ‘present’ data, 699.27 for the IAs and 296.84 for the NIAs. It has to be noted that the community level data covered not just the sitios where the intervention program is being implemented but the whole barangay including the sitios without inter-vention.
• In the household data where the households included in the study are household located
in the intervention sitios, an increase in the income was noted. The difference in the household and community data could be in the coverage. At the community level, sitios within the barangay that has no UDP intervention were still a part in the coverage of the primary and secondary data gathered for that barangay.
• For both IAs and NIAs, the number of rich people increased in the present but such a
The Upland Communities: 105 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
growing population still could not out-number those who are still living in poverty.
Availability of Services
Electricity
• While in the ‘before’ condition nearly half of the communities in the NIAs and a third of
the communities in the IAs have no access to electricity, a remarkable rise in the average number of households that have been energized in both the IAs and NIAs in the present condition is reported.
• Of those that have access to electricity in the ‘before’ condition, an average of 29.3 households has access in the IAs and 43.5 in the NIAs. The present data showed that there were already an average of 356.82 households and an average of 259.43 households that were energized in IAs and NIAs, respectively.
Water
• It took a slightly longer time for the IAs (an average of 37.2 minutes) than the NIAs (an
average of 25 minutes) to obtain water from the source during the pre-intervention condi-tion.
• In the Post-Intervention Study, the time was relatively shortened for both areas and data for wet and dry seasons were also gathered. During dry season average time, in minutes, taken for the households to obtain water from the source decreased to 12.57 and 12.30 for IAs and NIAs, respectively. During wet season, fetching time consumed dropped to 15.43 and 19.30 for IAs and NIAs, respectively.
Education
• In the ‘before’ condition, all the communities in the NIAs while 88.9 per cent in the IAs offered complete elementary. Percentage gleaned in the former areas lessened to 90 in the present though, while the latter stayed the same.
• It takes a longer time to reach the nearest school in the IAs (an average of 143 minutes) by foot than the NIAs (an average of 111 minutes) in the ‘before’ condition. However, a cut in the average time spent was noted for both areas. The cut was more significant in the IAs (from an average of 143 minutes to 34.9 minutes) than in the NIAs (from 111 minutes to 74 minutes).
Health Clinic/Services
• There were more functioning health clinic/posts in the IAs than in the NIAs during the ‘before’ condition. After five years, the availability of such facility decreased in the IAs but somehow showed an increase in the NIAs.
The Upland Communities: 106 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• The midwife has been identified by both IAs and NIAs as the person responsible in man-aging the health clinic before. Although, in the present the IAs still attest to this, the NIAs on the other hand, identified the BHWs as the persons who now frequently take charge of the facility.
• The percentage of communities that reported that the doctor does not report to the clinic increase for both areas (from 22.2% to 50% for IAs and from 18.2% to 40% for NIAs).
Other Infrastructures Available
• The pre-intervention data revealed that a third of the communities in the intervention area have rice mills while none could be found in NIAs. But now, presence of rice mill in the former is only 10%.
• In IAs, there is an increase in the availability of other infrastructures such as 1) corn mill (from 44.4% to 50% of the communities reporting its availability), 2) crop dryer (from 72.2% to 100%) and, 3) grain store (from 38.9% to 72.2%). An increase in corn mill and rice mill was noted in the NIAs. In the household data, a decrease in the corn production was reported by the respondents. This particular finding may run contrary to the com-munity finding regarding the increase other infrastructures in the area. Upon a closer ex-amination, an increase in the number of corn mills in the “after” situation may still be consistent with the household findings because even with the decrease in corn produc-tion, an increase in the number of corn mills may still be reasonable. The number of available corn mills during the baseline may not be proportionate to the volume of corn produced. Hence, at the present situation, even with a decrease in corn production, an in-crease in the number of corn mills may still be valid.
• As to the presence of other social infrastructures, both IAs and NIAs, have commonalities in terms of the presence of community halls, chapels or church buildings, basketball courts and school buildings before and after intervention.
Community Plans
• Both IAs and NIAs claimed that participatory community planning has been conducted in the last five years. At present, an increase was noted in the number of communities that conducted participatory community planning in both areas. Although an increase is noted in both the IAs and NIAs in the conduct of participatory community planning as well as in its implementation, data from the Community-Based Organizations (CBOs) in-dicated that the implementation of the plan is visible in the IAs than in the NIAs.
The Upland Communities: 107 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Community Organizations
• In the ‘before’ condition almost all communities found in the intervention and non-
intervention areas claimed that there are community groups that meet on a regular basis in their respective communities.
• There were residents in the IAs (66.7%) and NIAs (45.4%) that are members of coopera-tives based outside their respective communities.
• At present (“after” the intervention condition), a number of organizations have been iden-tified to be operating both in the IAs and NIAs. In the IAs, moderately-sized organiza-tions are identified as follows: school organizations, credit groups, livelihood assistance organizations, and women’s group. In the case of NIAs, the following are moderately sized organizations: religious organization and school organization.
Children in School
• In the ‘before’ condition, there were more children of school age that completed elemen-tary education in the NIAs than the IAs. More girls have completed elementary education than the boys. The reason that more girls than boys finish their elementary schooling is that boys are tapped as helpers in the farms.
• The pre-intervention data revealed that more children of school age in the IAs than NIAs are currently attending secondary school. The pattern of more girls than boys attending school holds true.
• At present (“after” condition), an increase in the average number of children that finished elementary school is noted in the IAs. Furthermore, an increase in the number of chil-dren who are reported to be currently attending secondary school was also noted in both IAs and NIAs.
Community Health
• In the “before” condition, the top four diseases with the most number of cases per year and most number of communities affected in the IAs are as follows: malaria, diarrhea, cough, and fever. The same diseases were common in the “before” condition of the NIAs.
• At present, only three diseases emerged to be prevalent in both IAs and NIAs. They are as follows: cough, fever and diarrhea.
• In the present study, additional inquiries were set to assess community health (services offered in the nearest health post, average number of households who availed, average number of days services are offered and average number of couples practicing family planning). In both the IAs and NIAs, health services such as immunization, pre-natal, provision of vitamin A, routine check-ups and family planning services are the most availed of.
The Upland Communities: 108 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• Health services such as prenatal, routine check-up, family planning services, and the TB program are frequently offered per month in both the IAs and the NIAs. Noticeably, there are more number of days that family planning services are offered in the IAs than in the NIAs.
• At present, more couples in the IAs, are practicing family planning (138.46) than those in the NIAs (96.97).
Agricultural Support Services
• In the “before” condition, there were slightly more agriculture staff assigned in the NIAs (an average of 1.9 per community) than the IAs (an average of 1.3 per community).
• At present, a large difference in the number of visits by the DA staff in the last 12 months, existed between the IAs (39.93) and NIAs (4).
• In the “before” condition, there were more communities in the NIAs (36.4%) that were not given an agricultural support than the IAs (12.5%).
• Support provided both in the IAs and NIAs are as follows: support in the conduct of training/seminars, provision of seedlings, and monitoring of agricultural crops.
Land Tenure
• In the baseline study conducted, six out of the 18 IAs did not provide data about the main form of land tenure in the community. None among the IAs and NIAs provided an an-swer for the question of whether owners of the land have formal land titles or none.
• In terms of the main form of land tenure, the baseline study as well as the post-intervention study revealed that more households in the IAs have no titles but are consid-ered owners of the land, than the households in the NIAs.
• The average number of households who are renters are more or less the same between the IAs (68.2) and NIAs (70.0), in the “before” condition. The same goes for the IAs (78.41) and the NIAs (71.13) in 2005.
• At present, there is an increase in the average number of households in both the IAs and the NIAs, who are owners of formally titled land (A & D) with individual ownership ti-tles.
• A large increase is also seen, at present, in the average number of households with com-munal but limited tenure, such as the CBFMA.
• In all, there is a need to address the resource tenure improvement in both areas.
Savings and Loans
• In the baseline study, seven out of the 18 and four out of the 11 communities in the inter-
The Upland Communities: 109 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
vention and non-intervention areas, respectively, claim that they simply could not save out of their earnings.
• Noticeably, the number of households in the IAs included in the baseline study, who mostly saved their money in informal institutions, is almost at par with the number of households in the NIAs included in the post-intervention study, who saved their money in an institution.
• More from the IAs (63.6%) prefer to save through the piggy bank way than the NIAs (28.6%).
• In both baseline and post-intervention studies, the average number of households that have outstanding loans is greater in the intervention areas than in the non-intervention ar-eas.
• The topmost source of loan for the IAs in the baseline study is their families and friends (38.9), while those in the post-intervention study mostly borrowed money from traders (34.68).
• For the NIAs in the baseline study, loans were mostly obtained from banks. The NIAs in the post-intervention study, on the other hand, got most of their loans from traders.
• Banks are considered as the least source of loans in both IAs and NIAs in the post-intervention study. Nevertheless, they are one of the top sources of loans in both IAs and NIAs in the baseline study.
Remittances
• At present, the number of families who have members who migrated outside the commu-nity who occasionally send money to the people left behind in the place of origin in-creased in both areas. However, the increase is higher in the IAs than the NIAs.
Degradation and Misuse of Natural Resources
• The majority of IAs and NIAs in both the baseline and post-intervention studies experi-enced the following: erosion, landslides, gully formation, broken hedges, exposed stones, splash erosion, and sheet erosion. At present, the occurence of these problems have less-ened, particularly in the IAs. Erosion, which was reported to have the highest occurrence (88.9%) in the IAs was down in its reporting by 14.5 percentage points. In almost all of the problems identified, there was a decrease in the occurrence. Sheet erosion was more than halved from 72.2% in the 2000 reports that it did occur to 35.3% in 2005. The NIAs are still reporting high percentage of occurrence although a slight decrease is noted in the following: exposed stones, splash erosion, and sheet erosion.
• More than 80 per cent of both the IAs and NIAs in the baseline study reported the pres-ence of forest trees in their respective areas. IAs (94.1) and NIAs (100) in the post-intervention study revealed an increase in the reporting of the presence of forest trees.
• Adoption of a farm system increased in both the IAs and the NIAs in the post-intervention study. The most remarkable increase is observed in the adoption of contour farming in the IAs in 2005.
The Upland Communities: 110 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
Types of Soil and Water Management Adopted in the Community
• Increase in the adoption of the several types of soil and water management is more evi-dent in the IAs in 2005.
• In particular, a remarkable increase was noted in strip contouring, from 27.8% adoption in 2000 to 88.2% adoption in 2005.
• A decrease on all types of land conflict could be noted in the NIAs of the post-intervention study.
• Meanwhile, there is a slight increase of conflict in the adjacent sitio within the watershed (27.8 in 2000 to 41.2 in 2005) and adjacent sitios, barangay, or municipality outside the watershed (33.3. in 2000 to 52.9 in 2005) in the intervention areas.
Summary of the Pre- and Post-Intervention and Non-Intervention Areas: Insights from the field Intervention Areas (IAs)
► Land Use Based Participatory Barangay Development Planning through LGU and Community Capacity Building
• All the intervention areas in the five provinces claimed that there has been participatory
community planning in the last three years. • The participatory planning of the intervention areas mostly included road building or
maintenance, school building construction, and watershed projects. • Intervention areas in three provinces referred to participatory planning as a means of ad-
dressing problems such as difficult road conditions and other infrastructure problems, like the building of schools or the renovation of the barangay hall.
• Plans being implemented at present in the IAs of three provinces include contour farm-ing, development of a water system, and tree planting, to sustain the forest.
► The LGU and its Role
• In all of the intervention areas, the efforts made by the LGUs were duly recognized. • Several activities initiated by the LGUs were as follows: monitoring of the project bene-
ficiaries, status of livestock or the condition of the farmers; holding meetings and infor-mation drives, particularly agriculture-related; and providing technical assistance in the farm.
The Upland Communities: 111 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• Intervention areas in three provinces mentioned that assistance in agriculture was further extended by the LGUs through the help of the DA staffers.
• The DA staffers extended the following services in the intervention areas: technical assis-tance in the farm; inputs on appropriate technology in farming; and spearheading pest management.
• Additional agricultural support services that were sought after by intervention areas are: further support, either in the form of planting materials, organic fertilizers or in financing, as well, and introduction of new technology in farming that would further assist the man-agement of the farm.
► Community Organizations in IAs and their Roles
• Community organizations have different roles in addressing community concerns, organ-izational issues and/or individual concerns. In the intervention areas in three of the prov-inces, the following were the usual issues encountered:cooperative development in order to enjoy the benefits of working together; enhancement of women’s participation in the community and training on gender relations; operation of a micro-finance project; access to credit and savings; spiritual upliftment; and improvement of the living standard of the people.
• Activities usually initiated by the community organizations present in the intervention ar-eas include: community beautification; community meetings; leadership training ses-sions; money-lending activities; and tree planting.
• Aside from the community organizations, the participants from the intervention areas identified key players in the development process. UDP, LGUs, i.e., from the barangay level to the province, and DENR, were the ones generally mentioned.
► Types of Soil and Water Management in Relation to Degradation and Misuse of Natural Resources
• Soil. Intervention areas in three provinces revealed that there is already a need to use fer-
tilizers in order to come up with a good harvest. • In the intervention areas, preservation of the soil’s fertility and prevention of soil erosion
were made possible through the planting of trees, prohibition of the practice of burning of plant wastes, and most of all, through contour farming.
• Water. Intervention areas in the four provinces indicated that they already have a devel-oped water system through the combined efforts of the UDP and LGUs.
• All of the participants from the intervention areas were able to identify that the planting of trees near the water source and prohibiting excessive cutting of trees helped in the con-servation of water.
• Forest. Activities such as reforestation, presence of forest guards, frequent monitoring by DENR personnel, environmental awareness raising, and non-practice of the slash and burn manner of farming, are now being done in intervention areas in order to stop the dwindling number of forest trees.
The Upland Communities: 112 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• Unavailability of livelihood options was raised by respondents in the intervention areas in two provinces as the cause why residents resort to cutting of trees in order to earn.
► Programs and projects in the IAs
• Common forms of assistance provided by agencies or stakeholders in the community in-
clude: livelihood projects or assistance, such as goat dispersal and access to loans; agri-culture–related trainings and seminars; provision of seedlings; infrastructure projects such as road rehabilitation and footbridges; and spring development for a convenient wa-ter supply.
Non-Intervention Areas (NIAs): Barangay Level
• For the past three years, all NIAs have conducted participatory community planning. Road rehabilitation and maintenance was the most prominent project that planned out through the participatory process although other significant infrastructure developments were likewise identified.
• Planning of livelihood projects through the participatory process was highlighted by one NIA province. These livelihoods directly focus on women’s and children’s welfare.
• Another NIA province emphasized projects and activities distinctive from the other NIA provinces. Such activities include seminar on savings and loans group, peace and order, request on operation ‘tuli’ (circumcision), and program of activities for fiesta among oth-ers.
• As highlighted in two NIA provinces, participatory community planning is conducted primarily to address common problems in the community, and to inform the community of programs and projects.
• Most of the plans that had been carried out in each of the five NIA provinces were al-ready on the process of implementation, if not completely realized.
• The key players that contributed to the realization of community projects are none other than the Local Government Units (LGU), the barangay council, the provincial and na-tional governments, even the military and the barangay folks.
► Community Organizations in NIAs and their Roles
• NIA provinces reported that several community organizations with different levels of ca-pacities are operating in their respective places.
• Topping the significant issues addressed by the community organizations are livelihood enhancement specifically for the women, strengthening and assisting IP’s and/or upland dwellers’ organization or group, and unity and cooperation in the community.
The Upland Communities: 113 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
► The LGU and its Role
• The LGUs in the NIAs have provided several services and have significantly contributed
their part for community development. Primarily, the municipal staff are involved in barangay sessions and meetings; they conduct information dissemination and inputs on appropriate farming systems; they provide inputs on health care for livestock; and they are in-charge of monitoring the LGU and other government programs.
• The devolved DA staff were likewise seen as providing assistance in the parts of the LGUs in NIAs. The most common services they extended include: conducting artificial insemination of selected livestock even de-worming and immunization; and monitoring and assisting farmers on agri-related problems.
• Various expectations regarding agricultural support services in NIAs were raised. They mainly enumerated farm financing, which includes provision of fertilizers, planting mate-rials and other farm inputs; training sessions on farm management with emphasis on new technologies and practices; and support on livestock.
► Types of Soil and Water Management in Relation to Degradation and Misuse of Natural Resources
• The residents in the NIAs reported that soil fertility is no longer true in the present. Forest denudation was chiefly identified to cause soil degradation although one NIA province included the heavy use of chemical fertilizers as another contributing factor.
• As such, the non-intervention areas proved that they are vulnerable to landslides and flooding, washing away the topsoil. Inappropriate farming practices, which include indis-criminate cutting of trees and ‘slash and burn’ farming resulted to soil erosion.
• Existing initiatives utilized in the NIAs to address soil fertility include: diversified farm-ing and appropriate farm management. Some provinces identified these methods as com-posed of crop rotation, fallowing, and contour farming. Planting of trees as it improves soil condition is likewise imperative. One NIA province emphasized the use of fertilizer (14-14-14), organic farming, and mulching as these are also helpful in the process.
• Closely related strategies to prevent and minimize soil erosion were likewise reported. Contour farming was one plausible method identified and the other one, which happened to be the most common rejoinder in the NIAs, was reforestation. In one NIA province, planting of forest trees in sloping areas and planting of fruit trees in flatlands was pro-nounced.
• Access to water supply has shown remarkable improvement in the NIAs after long years of carrying the brunt of spending time and effort of fetching water from a distant source.
• Two NIA provinces reported that, nonetheless, there is insufficient water supply. Water scarcity is primarily due to dry spell, lack of water reservoir, and deforestation.
• The best method to do to protect water supply, as identified by the NIAs, is tree planting, specifically in areas near the source. Also what goes with it is safeguarding against indis-criminate cutting of trees. Moreover, one NIA province reported other safety measures
The Upland Communities: 114 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
against water deficiency, such as follows: to report leaking pipes, to have a regular clean-ing of the reservoir, and to espouse proper waste management.
• The former vastness of the forest has been gradually destroyed in the NIAs because of pervasive denudation. Upland dwellers were said to be the major perpetrators of indis-criminate cutting down of trees and converting these areas to farmlands.
• Actions that must be undertaken to protect the richness of the forest in the NIAs were to infuse the importance of reforestation in as much as there is emphasis on the prohibition of forest denudation. However, it was reported that only very few people are docile when it comes to regulations.
Implications While a number of things changed in the IAs, it is also noted that corresponding changes also
occurred in the NIAs. However, there are in the changes that are quite noticeable in the IAs than
in the NIAs. This is specifically true under the following aspects: 1) occurrence of problems
due to degradation and misuse of natural resources, 2) presence of forest trees, 3) farming system
agreement adopted in the community, and 4) types of soil and water management adopted in the
community. Along these areas, there seemed to be a ripple effect because some of the NIAs
have adopted some management practices that they have seen to be beneficial to the community.
Although there are some communities that reported an improvement in their roads due to UDP
intervention, there was not much change in the cost of transportation, It seems that the rising
cost of gasoline is a determining factor in this rather than the improvement in the road condition.
Increase in income is not yet felt, although diversification gave them security and food availabil-
ity. However, they still have to harvest the crops that they planted that will give long term result.
Although there was a slight increase in their savings pattern in the IAs than in the NIAs, savings
in a formal institution is not that much practiced.
In the area of community and institutional development, the IAs are more dynamic and active in
this aspect since community organizing, value reorientations, leadership training, among others
were conducted in said areas. Sustainability, though,needs to be emphasized. There are varia-
The Upland Communities: 115 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
tions in the activities of UBS in various IAs and activities are also highly dependent on the
strength of UBA as an organization and whether members are active or not.
Both Finance Services System and Enterprise Development need strengthening because not
much can be seen on this at the community level.
To ensure sustainability to the programs installed by the UDP, the LGUs, POs/CBOs, and the
NLAs should join hands and make sure that what has been started and installed should be sus-
tained specifically along the following areas:
1. Sustainable Agriculture Advocacy. Local government with support from non-
governmental organizations, cooperatives, and community-based organizations should in-
tensify sustainable agriculture advocacy among farmers to lessen production costs and to
promote environmental protection. Among the practices promoted are: contour farming,
organic farming, crop diversification, crop-livestock integration, among others.
2. Participation in local governance. Enhance people’s participation in local governance
through participation in the formulation of barangay development plans, municipal agri-
culture development plans and other local development plans; ensure budget allocation
for agriculture development and participate in the policy formulation towards agriculture
development.
3. LGU and POs Capacities on Sustainable Agriculture. Strengthening LGU and POs’ ca-
pacities on sustainable agriculture development through capacity building for the Mu-
nicipal Agriculture Office, Municipal Council and Barangay Council members on sus-
tainable agriculture;
4. Access to extension services. Install creative means for increasing access to extension
services including the provision of good quality seedlings, livestock and poultry.
5. Government should address key issues such as access to credit, market information, in-
frastructure and technical know-how of the people in the community.
6. Strengthen and support the practice of diversified and integrated farming systems. Pro-
mote crop diversification and integrated farming systems to farmers to safeguard farmers
against fluctuations inherent in single cropping practices.
The Upland Communities: 116 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
7. Strengthen farmers’ organizations and cooperatives. There is a need to assess the orga-
nizing efforts of government and NGOs to work towards enabling farmers and farmers
organizations/cooperatives on sustainable agriculture development and to be conduits and
partners of the government in promoting agricultural development in poor communities.
8. Developing alternative rural enterprises. Since most rural households depend solely on
agricultural harvests to meet their basic needs, there is a need to promote small-scale ru-
ral enterprises to augment farmers’ agricultural incomes such as marketing.
9. Capacity building interventions for rural enterprise development and management. Rural
enterprises as income diversification strategy are high risk. Their success is highly de-
pendent on the capacity and performance of the manager. Thus, technical assistance in
enhancing the management capability of manager-entrepreneurs, cooperative leaders, PO
leaders and NGO staff for rural enterprises.
10. Linkaging and networking. There is a need and potential for sharing of experiences,
building information linkages and exchanges. Farmers have to share their experience and
learn from the experience of other farmers.
11. Continue to pursue land tenure improvement in the uplands. The POs with the local gov-
ernment and DENR has to formulate local mechanisms to resolve land tenure issues and
concerns and establish tracking mechanisms to be updated of the status of the process in
securing tenurial instruments. Local government has to actively support land tenure im-
provement by integrating land tenure improvement in its local development plan.
The above recommendations can be captured in the Rural CO Standard (Batistiana and Murphy,
1996) as spelled out on the following areas of concerns:
• Organizational Development
• Critical Creative Collective Consciousness Raising
• Coalition Effort and Advocacy Work
• Overcoming Gender and other Biases
• Basic Services and Infrastructure
• Resource Tenure Improvement
• Economic Self-Reliance Strengthening
The Upland Communities: 117 The Post-Intervention Condition as Perceived by the Community Stakeholders and Beneficiaries
Volume 5
• Agricultural Development and Ecological Nurturance
Democratic Participation in Governance
References
Batistiana, Ma. B. and Dennis Muphy, 1996. Rural Community Organizing in the Philippines, COTRAIN, Quezon City. Upland Development Programme (UDP) in Southern Mindanao, The Philippines, Replicable Model for Sustainable Upland Development (August 2005) Upland Development Programme in Southern Philippines (UDP), 1999. Global Work Plan (January 1999 to January 2006). UNFPA and ANU, 1998. Southeast Asian Population in Crisis: Challenges to the Implementation of the ICPD Programme of Action. Canberra, Australia.