the ufo phenomenon - matthew petti · 2017. 4. 29. · mysteries, while nearly everyone knows about...

Matthew A. Petti The UFO Phenomenon © 2017 by Matthew Petti 800-931-8113 Discovering Ourselves, Reality and http://matthewpetti.com [email protected] the Cosmic Battle

1 | P a g e

The UFO Phenomenon

Discovering Ourselves, Reality and the Cosmic Battle

Courtesy http://psychics.co.uk/blog/ufo-experiences/

Introduction

There are very few people in the civilized world who aren’t privy – at least in part – to the

mounds of information centered on the UFO phenomena. A lot of this information is

convoluted by ET and UFO merchants who have transformed the mystery into a delusional

fantasy inspired by science fiction movies, documentaries of close encounters, eyewitness

testimony, and author-experts.

This is not meant to detract from the work and discoveries by experts, which has yielded

convincing evidence for the mystery, but instead to reveal the prevalent assumptions infused

into our understanding of it and how we might be missing the mark in our opinions.

How much do we really know about the UFO mystery? For the most part our analysis of the

UFO Phenomenon has a lot to do with how we see ourselves and the world in which we live. In

fact, most of our beliefs, questions and evaluations are based on our subconscious worldviews,


2 | P a g e

which stem from the underlying answers to the most important questions. Where did we come

from? What is our purpose? What is our destiny?

These questions have proven to be enigmatic, but our opinions are influenced by the

inheritance of dominating perspectives, which are continually sustained by mainstream media.

We are left only to sort the data and develop our own vague and divisive answers, which dwell

in our subconscious minds and play a huge role in our assessment of many things, including the

UFO mystery. This is why some people shun it for different reasons while others incorporate an

array of different assumptions into their evaluations – many of which are unsupported by

evidence.

Colossi of Ramses II - Courtesy of Jillan Bartels © 2016

The most widely accepted assumption is that the UFO evidence solidly supports the ET or extra-

terrestrial hypothesis. We imagine those who fly these unusual crafts as living beings from

other planets with similar mindsets and behaviors as ours, but with a higher degree of

technology and intelligence. The evidence lends itself to this assumption in part by our current

assessment of physical reality and its relation to the ancient megalithic mysteries. On the

surface it appears clear that these wondrous constructs must have required sophisticated

machinery and extensive forms of written material, yet no evidence for either have yet to be

uncovered.


3 | P a g e

So we are compelled to intelligently ask ourselves how this could be possible without an

outside source of some kind and we are left with presumably little more than linking the

staggering UFO evidence to both the complex ancient structures and the prevalent worldwide

myths of ancient gods – ET’s who altered the human genome, constructed the ancient

megaliths and departed while keeping a watchful eye on our progress.

From the motion picture, Men in Black © 1997 Columbia Pictures

Add to this the fact that only 10% of the population knows anything about the ancient

mysteries, while nearly everyone knows about the UFO phenomenon, and we find it’s quite

easy to present UFO’s to the general public as the solutions for mysteries, to which most people

aren’t privy. Movies, TV and scientific theories have led us to embellish ideas of time-travel,

the Multiverse and extraterrestrials as if they were fact. It’s easy to see why UFO enthusiasts

subscribe to the popularized Ancient Alien theory while enlisting blindly to unproven scientific

assertions, both of which contribute largely to the widely-accepted archetypes of thought.

Do the precepts forged by the popularized models prevent us from entertaining a new

explanation for the evidence of UFO’S – one that can proffer a connection to a revised concept

for physical reality, ancient mysteries and the three important questions? Most important, can

it expose our current assumptions as the Achilles heel to our human progress?


4 | P a g e

How can we easily imagine these hypothetical beings from other worlds as advanced creatures

without seeing this potential in ourselves? Today, many seekers envision an approaching

Golden Age – a great awakening, which coincides with a common understanding that propels

the human race forward and unlocks our unseen potentials. Part of that vision for our future is

believed by many to eventually be the direct result of UFO intervention.

What can be more spectacular than the life we see all around us? The human being is a

miraculous phenomenon itself. Do you realize the many things that take place within our body

just to move our hands and fingers? We take all of this for granted and yet we look for answers

outside ourselves to explain the things we can actually figure out by looking within and around

us with a little more scrutiny.

We can provide new and viable solutions to the mysteries that confound us when we realize

that technology alone is insufficient in measuring the hierarchy of human advancement. In

order to see a new perspective we need to recognize and acknowledge the subtle but infinite

power within us. This may seem esoteric, but we can unequivocally prove it to be an easily

seen but unobserved dynamic, which needs to be accounted for in the reality models proposed

by physics today.

Take the attitude of the student. Never be too big to ask questions. Never know too much to

learn something new. –Og Mandino

The teacher, who is indeed wise, does not bid you enter the house of his wisdom, but rather

leads you to the threshold of your mind. –Kahlil Gibran

I have always been regretting that I am not as wise as the day I was born. Henry David Thoreau

The wise are wise only because they love. –Paulo Coelho

How many of these quotes resonate with you? Truths like these are not made up in someone’s

mind. They are discovered through experience and wisdom because Truth can only be

discovered, not created.

Wisdom is the uncanny ability to recognize Truth without proof. –Matthew Petti

Let’s take a quick look at the definition of wisdom by Webster: Having the power to judge

rightly and follow the soundest course of action, based on knowledge, experience,

understanding and good judgment; insightful understanding of what is true, right or enduring.

The definition clearly implies a sixth sense, and it truly is. We discover the truth either through

experience or the insights of our wisdom; we don’t create it.


5 | P a g e

A simple example of how our insight actually works will clarify this a bit more. Let’s suppose we

are scheduled for an appointment that could dramatically change our career. Let’s also

suppose that the lone clock in the house was an hour slow and we weren’t aware of it. By

simply relying on the clock for the proper time we would fail to achieve our objective because

we didn’t know the truth. We certainly believed that we knew but we were wrong and had to

suffer the negative consequence of an improper choice.

Let’s also suppose that, under the same circumstances, we had a hunch that something wasn’t

right. Immediately we would begin to look for clues to verify our hunch and soon we would

find that our intuition was correct and that the clock was wrong. Our wisdom, or 6th sense, our

intuition, ESP or whatever you wish to call it, freed us from the mistake of our ignorance by

presenting a thought or a hunch, which we willingly recognized, accepted and inspected. I’m

willing to bet that everyone has had similar experiences throughout their lives.

And, I’m sure that many people have sometimes ignored the inner voice only to find out later

that we should have listened to it. It is experiences like these that slowly help us to recognize

and to listen to the subtle but powerful voice of wisdom.

Where does our wisdom or insight stem from? What exactly is our sixth sense? It can easily be

demonstrated to be much more than just a subtle voice within us. This microscopic inkling is

the seed to an underlying force, which provides us with a new perspective on reality and a


6 | P a g e

unique solution for the megalithic ancient mysteries. We will address this in more detail later

on in this presentation.

Many hidden truths are often unobserved, not invisible. --Matthew Petti

PART I – The Fermi Paradox and its Rebuttals

We need to be more philosophical in the evaluation of UFO phenomena because we cannot

count on science alone when it continues to rely on theories, which we can show to be equally

as presumptuous as religion can be. Clinging to dominant religious and scientific decrees

contributes in our failure to recognize viable alternatives. What are we missing?

When we look closely at the ET hypothesis and the contradictory evidence presented in the

Fermi Paradox, we will find the rebuttals of science are absurd and based solely on the

reluctance to acknowledge clear evidence that conflicts with a rigid adherence to the scientific

appraisal of reality, which is dictated by theoretical physics.

For those who aren’t familiar with the Fermi Paradox, it’s really simple. It all began in the early

1950’s when Enrico Fermi and some friends were having a friendly get-together discussing

UFO’s. He simply asked, “Where are they?” His question was based on the presumed age of

our planet in relation to our galaxy’s age and explained how evidence should be overwhelming

and that our galaxy alone should be teeming with life just based on the size and numbers of

stars. This created a huge problem for those who believed in ET’s because, on the surface, it

greatly challenged the ET hypothesis.

Graphic by Danielle Futselaar is the famous Drake Equation © SETI


7 | P a g e

In 1961 astronomer Frank Drake, who played a major role in spearheading the SETI movement,

published a mathematical equation, which takes into account many variables including the very

small percentage of habitable planets in our Milky Way galaxy alone. Back then, the majority of

the scientific community did not believe in extraterrestrial life and his equation expressed the

possibilities that exist on a cosmic scale in order to convince his colleagues to board the SETI

train.

Also part of this ongoing evaluation is the Kardashev Scale – a hypothetical classification system

proposed in 1964 by Russian astronomer Nikolai Kardashev where advancing stages of

technological civilizations could exist within the small number of habitable planets. Nikolai’s

ambitions were to promote the SETI movement as well. His hypothetical models were a

science-fiction framework that convinced other scientists to become involved in the swiftly

growing interest centered on ET’s.

Kardashev used the Drake equation and derived estimates for the numbers of highly advanced

civilizations possessing the ability to traverse the galaxy. He demonstrated how they would

already exist within the Drake equation – even when enormous periods of time were allotted to

achieve higher levels and when unusual cosmic circumstances, also known as filters, could

eradicate any civilization.

The Kardashev scale begins with a Type 1, which is able to harness the total energy of our sun

on earth. According to optimistic scientists, we are about 200 years away from this

hypothetical possibility. Type 2 civilizations can harness and control the power of the star itself

within a hypothetical Dyson Sphere – a thin membrane that surrounds and encapsulates the

star and habitable planet – an idea introduced in a 1937 science fiction novel by Olaf Stapledon

and popularized by physicist Freeman Dyson in 1960 who speculated these structures would be

evident in a highly technological society.

Type 3 civilizations are characterized as a master race with amazing technological achievement,

which is infused into all biological processes. Try to envision cybernetic organisms with self-

replicating robot machines – based on the 1945 framework of physicist John Von Neumann –

being launched to colonize other solar systems.

Drake was a relentless pioneer in the promotion for SETI. He was the founder of Project Ozma

– a 1960 ET communication antenna designed to scan the nearby stars presumed to have

inhabitable planets. By early 1990 his efforts, along with many colleagues including Carl Sagan,

helped to influence the majority of the top level scientists within NASA into believing that

extraterrestrial life was most probable in spite of the contradictory evidence. This led to the


8 | P a g e

first NASA Microwave Observing Program (MOP) in 1992, which was funded by the government

and cancelled in 1993 after dissention among scientists, contractors and congress.

Many interested scientists whose previous liaisons with Harvard University and Ohio State

along with private investors continued the program without government funding under the

name Project Phoenix, which was the most sensitive and comprehensive search for

extraterrestrial intelligence inaugurated in 1995.

Project Phoenix ©SETI Institute Visit www.seti.org for more information

Drake’s 1992 book, “Is Anyone out There”, included his rebuttals for many of the obvious

questions proposed by the Fermi paradox, but his arguments were aimed primarily at the lack

of evidence for alien visitation here on Earth – not on our failure to merely receive a radio

signal. In retrospect, this seemed more like a publicity stunt aimed at swaying public sentiment

and skeptic scientists in an effort to acquire support from both government and private

investors.

In Drake’s four major rebuttals for the lack of evidence for alien presence on Earth we find that

none of them hold water scientifically and, in retrospect, appear to be an attempt to increase

public awareness and the advancement of the SETI project. His unreasonable arguments went

unnoticed by the newly forming cult of UFO enthusiasts who knew little or nothing about

Fermi, Kardashev or even Drake for that matter.

http://www.seti.org/


9 | P a g e

Let’s take a closer look at the reasons given for lack of evidence for alien visitation on earth.

1. ET’s find it costly in terms of both money and energy

2. ET’s see no personal gain in Type 3 Von Neumann machines

3. ET’s are content with colonizing a local solar system rather than the galaxy

Each of these points is easily seen as presumptuous extensions of ourselves and our

preconceived notions for reality. The first is extremely ludicrous because I highly doubt an

advanced society would utilize something as inhibitive as currency. Even if they were merely a

Type 1 society, energy would be no issue. Moreover, the Type 1 Civilization model lacks the

technology to traverse at speeds needed to colonize nearby star-systems.

The second argument refers to the Von Neumann self-replicating machines, which are products

of a hypothetical Type 3 civilization in the Kardashev Scale that, if possible, would render this

rebuttal absurd to any curious scientist because there are no limits to curiosity. Moreover, the

implication that higher technology fails to yield personal achievement is inconsistent with the

hypothetical level of technological advancement. The same applies to the third rebuttal.

Notably, these rebuttals stem from a position where technology is the sole measure of

advancement – the dominant thought-model, which can be shown as the real obstacle to

maximizing our human potential. The civilization ladder in the Kardashev scale is mere

speculation and theoretical renditions of the same hindering thought-model for physical reality.

More important, they are not proven in any manner and represent a sci-fi fantasy that can

never be achieved and, if they have been, evidence for ET would be plentiful. Something is

definitely wrong.

The fourth rebuttal by Drake is the most transparent for any objective pundit. He claims that

hypothetical aliens are using radio transmissions and communications, which they must have

found to be the best alternative in reaching out to other civilizations. In his futile attempt to

rebuke the naysayers regarding alien visitation on Earth he proposes a question obviously

aimed at promoting the SETI project. Why haven’t we heard anything from them? Here is his

response,

“The silence we have heard so far is not in any way significant. We still have

not looked long enough or hard enough. We've not explored a large enough

chunk of the cosmic haystack. I could speculate that 'they' are watching us

to see if we are worth talking to. Or perhaps the ethic exists among them

that rules, 'There is no free lunch in the Galaxy.' If we want to join the

community of advanced civilizations, we must work as hard as they must.


10 | P a g e

Perhaps they will send a signal that can only be detected if we put as much

effort into receiving it as they put into transmitting it. NASA SETI is the

beginning of the first truly meaningful effort to demonstrate the sincerity of

our intentions."

In considering the previous rebuttals, this was very ridiculous – especially in retrospect. All of

the star-systems in our back yard, which can be easily seen in the constellations at night, have

been perused with a fine-tooth comb and no evidence whatsoever exists. These include the

famous Orion constellation and Sirius – those believed to have had something to do with

ancient Egypt. Betelgeuse, Rigel, Arcturus and Alpha Centauri have all been scanned and yet no

evidence exists. Stars more distant than these including the stars in Orion’s belt have been

scanned and their average distance is 1000 light years away.

Allen Telescope Array Courtesy SETI Institute Visit www.seti.org/ata for more information

Science continues to insist that life ‘out there’ must exist because of the numbers, yet failing to

recognize the lack of evidence based on the same numbers. Still, SETI expanded over the years

http://www.seti.org/ata


11 | P a g e

and after investing millions of dollars for research and construction of the Allen Telescope Array

in Northern California, the search comes up empty. Not even a single radio signal.

Does that stop the futile search? Plans are ongoing in the development of the Square Kilometer

Array – a $2 Billion radio telescope project to be built in Australia and South Africa. It will

operate over a wide range of frequencies and its size will make it 50 times more sensitive than

any other radio instrument. We continue in a futile search for ET and yet we fail to accept the

obvious truth.

Radio signals should be prevalent using the most conservative numbers. In 2013, National

Radio Astronomy Observatory's Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), which links radio telescopes

from Hawaii to St. Croix, made a special attempt to look for Voyager 1's signal to test their

sensitivity. Radio telescopes cannot see in visible light, but rather "see" signals in radio light.

Voyager 1 radio signal captured in one second. More information at

https://www.nrao.edu/pr/2013/voyager/

Voyager 1's main transmitter radiates around 22 watts, which is incredibly weak by the

standards of modern wireless communications. Voyager 1's signal appears larger and brighter

when compared to most natural objects studied by radio telescopes. The VLBA easily detected


12 | P a g e

Voyager's signal, picking it out from the background radio noise in less than one second. Are we

beginning to see a pattern here?

Newer rebuttals to the Fermi Paradox continue because of its merit. The Rare Earth hypothesis

claims the Drake equation isn’t sufficient in determining the amount of habitable planets

because of the increased rarity that can be implied by our position in relation to other celestial

bodies. It goes on to claim that, “if earth is an extremely rare planet, and we have no way of

knowing whether it is or isn’t, then all we can determine is that life on Earth has developed in

some manner.” Wow! We knew that before the search for ET began. It seems like these

intelligent scientists are skipping rope by subtly implying that the search for extraterrestrial life

is futile.

The Youngness hypothesis presented by MIT physicist Alan Guth is based on the Multiverse

theory, and therefore its credibility is questionable. The Multiverse is only a theoretical

derivative of the materialistic models of Quantum reality. Notwithstanding the association, this

argument is equally absurd because its conclusion is that only one planet in each universe is

proposed to exist. This alone should be enough to completely dissuade ET advocates from an

ongoing search for ET because, if only one planet harbors life in any universe, then we are the

lone habitable planet in ours. Once again, we see a subtle but firm implication that the search

for ET is futile.

The Zoo hypothesis, which is most subscribed to by ET proponents today, concludes that ET’s

do not want to associate with us because we would appear like mere ants to them. This can be

proven to be the most ridiculous argument from a standpoint of higher intelligence and

demonstrates how our presumptions always get in the way of our observations.


13 | P a g e

Ants make bridges or sacrifice themselves as a raft/water bridge for the benefit of the colony!

We need only to look at the lesser creatures – including ants – to see the clear evidence that an

underlying force is working through them without the interference of thought and individual

will. They are united in purpose and cause and their collective entity is capable of grandiose

tasks. Doesn’t it stand to reason that we as humans would be capable of much more on a

collective scale? What is it that stifles us?

Therefore, to presume that these "Higher Beings" exist but perceive us as ants and have no

interest to contact us is an error that stems from subscribing to the overriding archetype where

technology is the only measurement of advancement. We will see clearly that technological

prowess is an accomplishment only of intellect, which we boast of because of our failure to see

the underlying cause to reality itself.

The Zoo hypothesis also claims that ET’s would rather leave us alone so that we can discover on

our own. I’m certain that self-discovery is the key to our collective progress and if this is true,

then we can stop our search for life “out there” immediately. We are the highest form of life.

There is no need for us to find other life, but to find the hidden potential within ourselves so

that we can become in an instant, the "Higher Beings” we presume to be eluding us.


14 | P a g e

The evidence and the paradox clearly indicate that ET life in our galaxy is non-existent, yet

rebuttals for this solid evidence clearly show the stubbornness of scientists who fail to accept

the idea that we are alone – even if just within our own galaxy. Many of the famed theories of

science could collapse without proof for extraterrestrial life and the futile search is beginning to

appear desperate. Perhaps it’s time to go back to the drawing board.

It’s very important to note that we cannot ignore the undeniable evidence for UFO’s, but in this

context we will find a timely and crucial perspective for it. Meanwhile, I expect that the more

recent discovery of nearby exoplanets and any feint radio-signal detections will be embellished

by presumptuous scientists clinging to the precepts that are fashioned by the incomplete model

for reality.

Only the sixth sense can expose what the other five have hidden. --Matthew Petti

PART II – The Metaphysics of Truth – Reality, Time and Collective Consciousness

Many things contribute to our personal answers to the three important questions and the more

we think about it, the more complex it can become. However, if we could answer these

questions with clarity and consistency, we would be well on our way to finding the answers for

everything that baffles us today. Where did we come from? Answering the first question

compels us to accept or reject some or all of the tenets of creationism or evolutionism as they

are currently understood.

My position isn’t to dissect the religious beliefs and scientific theories, but rather to

demonstrate what we are missing in our evaluations by failing to recognize and associate

evidence and facts from both sides, which are either disregarded because they seem to be

unrelated, or unobserved because we aren’t looking in the proper direction. Simply put, we will

not look in our storage shed for something we expect to find under the kitchen sink – nor will

we look for evidence to prove otherwise. Our preconceived notions dictate the aims of our

curiosity and whether or not to accept, deny or ignore any particular information.

The Big Bang is only a theory, yet it has been publicized with unwavering certainty to become

implanted into human consciousness as though it were a fact. Think about it: a single point no

bigger than an atom from which all matter of the infinite Universe exploded into existence. Is it

any more bizarre than the notion that God created the entire universe in 7 days?


15 | P a g e

Big Bang theory is not proven while it’s many flaws and unanswered questions go unnoticed.

A shift in the evaluation of scientific evidence can help to fuse the esoteric with theoretical

physics; staunchly reconfirm our beliefs in a higher power and unite us in understanding God

for what it really is – without religion. However, this cannot be done without recognizing the

role consciousness plays in the actual creation of reality and the willingness to be objective

without regards for which side of the proverbial argument we support.

Both religion and science have ignored consciousness from their assessments of reality.

Religion has externalized God as something separate from us and science has externalized all

processes as though each were something separate and behaving within sets of observable

laws. Science claims that everything can be broken down to matter and that consciousness is

the working of a brain – end of story.

Ironically, the empirical evidence of Quantum Mechanics clearly indicates that the observer and

the observed are linked, which implies that the conscious observer is paramount to the

observed reality – not just because we need to be conscious to observe it, but because

observation actually alters the outcome of experiments in QM. Does this tell us that reality

cannot exist without consciousness and further that reality is actually the result of

consciousness?


16 | P a g e

Recently, there has been much debate regarding consciousness in theoretical physics. Robert

Lanza, a biologist is the head of Astellas Global Regenerative Medicine, and a professor at Wake

Forest. He is also the founder of "Biocentrism," a biology-centric view of the world that asserts

the pivotal role of consciousness in creating reality.

Efforts have also been ongoing in an attempt to formulate consciousness mathematically into

problems that can be explored and discussed. Max Tegmark, a theoretical Physicist at MIT sets

out the problems that this new way of thinking raises and his approach is to think of

consciousness as a state of matter – like liquid, solids and gas. There’s so much more behind

the scenes and I highly doubt the solution is to equate consciousness to matter, but this proves

that science is beginning to realize the truth of the matter – so to speak!

Let’s briefly discuss the nagging problems and head-scratching in the Quantum community,

which is not popularized like the well-known theories. We have been bombarded with bits of

the theoretical model for reality by celebrity physicists like Michio Kaku and Neil DeGrasse

Tyson. Each of them presents the Multiverse and time-travel as pure fact in all of their

promotions. In essence we are getting very watered down versions of Quantum Reality while

science continually sells us a bill of goods.

We believe whatever we’re taught when an authority puts its stamp on it – even those who go to

Harvard are taught what is believed to be true without proof. Beam me up Scotty!

The heavily popularized theory for time-travel can only be theoretically possible by a theoretical

Multiverse. The myriad uncertainties observed at the quantum level have given rise to the

Multiverse theory, which was proposed partly to dismiss the paradox of traveling to the past

and changing the future.


17 | P a g e

Spacetime is the currently accepted mathematical model, which joins space and time together

to form a 4-D universe or block universe of length, width, depth and time. The spacetime model

suggests that different clocks exist in every region throughout the block universe and that past,

present and future exist simultaneously. In this model, time is reversible and time travel is

possible.

In simplest terms, the quantum measurements of separate particles suggests that neither

particle behaves consistently in regards to time between events; space between particles and

the order of events themselves. The spacetime model provides solutions to these quantum

mathematical quandaries as well the indifferences in macro reality, but only by explicit

acceptance – at the fundamental level – that particles are conscious observers.

This concept of time is becoming a heated argument among theoretical physicists, who insist

that time is not expressed properly in the mathematics used to derive the model. Some

scientists are beginning to recognize that the flow of time is not captured by modern

theoretical physics, even though it is the most obvious and crucial feature of time in everyday

life. The thrust to readdress time is led by names like Lee Smolin, Andreas Albrecht, Sean

Carroll, David Albert, Ludwig Bolzmann and many more.

In a nutshell, the current mathematical expression for time is lacking because it fails to express

time as we perceive it and thus the time reversible block universe model is insufficient. When

the introduction to the flow of time is expressed mathematically the derivatives clearly indicate

that the future is non-existent and created only by the events that precede it in a model known

as the Evolving Block Unit. It’s turning out to be that time travel is really nothing more than

science fiction based on mathematical derivatives of previous derivatives. Yet, we will never

hear that in any of the scientific propositions.

Mathematics has become increasingly complex in Quantum Physics, but math works the same

as logic. If we begin with a false assumption expressed mathematically and follow with

calculations based on that assumption, we will find the solutions to be mathematically correct.

However, false premises lead to false conclusions despite the correctness in the logic or math

that supports it.

When science accepts theoretical models to support another theory, they are often basing new

findings on unproven theories. This is known as non-empirical confirmation, which is simply the

acceptance of non-empirical evidence to promote another theory. In science, it happens more

than we know and I’m only scratching the surface here.


18 | P a g e

If we begin with a premise that excludes Consciousness and the flow of time and base our

queries and experiments on proving those presumptions, then all of the research and findings

would support the premise in theoretical assumptions, which could be expressed

mathematically.

The Big Bang is derived from the observable expansion of our Universe and played backwards

to a hypothetical starting point. But the expansion of our Universe has been derived after

nearly 100 years of assessing it from a strictly materialistic point of view and by accepting

previously unproven theories to formulate new ones. Is science painting itself into a corner?

Most people are not privy to any of this and yet we see scientific claims to be just as dogmatic

as religious claims. We are forced to accept many of these claims, which are lacking from both

a philosophical and scientific standpoint.

Math and reasoning are great tools but they only produce what we put into them.

Let us examine only what we know for sure – that which can easily be assessed by many more

than a small cult of mathematicians and scientists who make refutable claims verifiable only by

those who can read the language of very complex mathematics while supporting the

preliminary assumptions based on materialism alone. Let us examine the intrinsic, easily seen


19 | P a g e

but subtle and unobserved dynamic, which provides new explanations for many things

including the UFO phenomenon.

In my lifetime of research and philosophical renderings, I've discovered an easy to recognize but

unobserved dynamic – The Metaphysics of Truth, which reveals a hidden force and provides a

brand-new perspective on the subtle nature of reality and the human experience.

There are three basic principles to the Metaphysics of Truth. First and foremost, Truth is

immutable and universal – it doesn't change – only our perceptions change. Truth is Universal

and it must apply in all aspects of the visible and invisible realms – from the microcosm to the

macrocosm. As it is above so it is below. The only thing that changes is our perception over

time. Mankind once perceived the earth to be flat, but it didn’t change the truth.

The second important principle to the Metaphysics of Truth is the unbreakable conduit

between past and future. Time is irreversible and our future is not predetermined or randomly

determined. It is determined simply by the choices we make both individually and collectively,

all of which are governed by our beliefs. We can say with certainty that the inseparable bond

between past and future is the cause and effect of our beliefs and the choices influenced by

them. How many times have we heard that we create our own destiny?

This is simply known as causality – cause and effect or determinism. But, quantum mechanics

challenges our concepts of causality by implying that some things happen at random, with no

apparent cause, or that an action in one place can seem to have an effect elsewhere, even if the

two locations cannot interact. We can demonstrate clearly that random incidents only appear

to be so.

Let's suppose that you believe you can fly and decide to jump from the top of a tall building.

What will happen? The answer is obvious; you will either die or become seriously maimed. The

most important ramification is that we learned a lesson from the harsh experience of an

improper choice. Even in the previous clock example, an errant choice resulted from an errant

assumption and we suffered the consequence.

In both of these examples we see unequivocal proof that our beliefs or assumptions alter reality

and our future because they influence the choices we make. In our examples, Truth was in

direct opposition to the errant belief and choice, which allowed the effects to be easily seen.

If we can agree it is true that our belief and subsequent choice create our destiny in the

previous examples then the easily observed dynamics must work on every level – individually

and collectively – and throughout all of the visible and invisible realms because Truth is


20 | P a g e

universal and immutable. The collective consciousness is a real and powerful entity and we

only need to look at the lower species to observe its subtle but powerful workings.

If we look closely at Nature, we can witness the tremendous harmony of many of earth’s

species. They accomplish remarkable tasks with instinct, which is defined as an inherent

inclination of a living organism to complex behaviors without training or learning. Think about

that – an inherent intelligence chalked off without careful inspection or acknowledgement.

Science denounces God, but fails to see instinct for what it really is.

We marvel over their fantastic abilities, which should be no marvel whatsoever. Lower

creatures are united in purpose and cause – one mind, one purpose and amazing feats. Their

ultimate synergy develops without thought because the Essence of Life works perfectly through

them without the interference of individual will. They are one collective entity – one vehicle.

The Essence has reached the maximum potential of collective expression in those limited

vehicles.

In order to support this argument we must be able to associate our currently perceived reality

as the product of collective human consciousness. Can we somehow demonstrate that every

single choice in the world, no matter how trite, directly affects the dynamics of reality and the

future events of our planet and humanity? Can we show clearly that events are not random

and only appear to be?

To demonstrate how the enormous collective consciousness influences the very nature of

reality through collective choices, we must consider the near infinite number of possibilities

that exist through the immeasurable combinations of possible human choices at any given

moment.

Imagine if we could view everything that was happening in the entire world at once. Doors

opening, lights going on and off, people and vehicles moving, production, consumption, waste,

pollution, and communication, weather events and natural events and everything else we

observe would look like a huge ball of confusion without purpose or reason. It would appear to

be in a constant state of flux and it really is. What we deem to be reality is actually a constantly

changing illusion built upon collective conscious choice.


21 | P a g e

A famous quote by Einstein can be explained more fully.

Every trillionth (actually much smaller) of a second the possibilities are almost endless because

the possible combination of choices is not decided until the very moment they are acted upon.

The future is constantly being written and changed because, reality and future is in a constant

state of flux. It is unpredictable but still the direct result of determinism and free will on a

collective scale. I am free to choose, but the choices of the collective whole affect the reality

we perceive, much more so than my own choices. This is why some things appear to be

random and unrelated, but they are the direct result of collective conscious choice and often

not simply a single choice.

Quantum mechanics asserts that free will doesn’t exist with determinism and holds firmly that

the quantum world creates the illusion of free will in the macro world. The premise is based on

consciousness as an emergent property of existence and that all actions are based upon the

random outcome of interaction between particles in the brain. Are you kidding me?

Quantum physics recognizes countless possibilities at every trillionth (actually much less) of a

second or less at the sub-atomic level. These countless variations have led to the promotion of

scientific theories for parallel universes, or the Multiverse as it is now referred to, which

represent the immeasurable number of possible outcomes up to any point in time. Quantum


22 | P a g e

theorists posit that each possibility is realized in separate universes and that all of these

universes make up the Multiverse.

Science scoffs religion for spouting dogma and yet they present their findings as if they were

solidified as well. This isn’t an attempt to dismiss the evidence of scientific experiments but

instead to apply it in a new perspective.

Quantum experiments prove that sub-atomic particles can have several conflicting attributes,

i.e., they can take the form of a wave or a particle in different locations and with different

velocities and direction of travel at the same time and that only in the act of measurement do

they take on specific attributes and position. The strangest part is that observation affects the

outcome of the experiments.

In the Metaphysics of Truth model, Consciousness is viewed as the separate and underlying

non-material force of Nature and therefore emergent conscious awareness is the result of

sentience and intuition, which births free will and collectively contributes to the observable

randomness in both the quantum and the macro world. The myriad uncertainties we are failing

to observe in the macro world are built upon the sub-atomic particles of matter, which is why

we can easily see this flux in quantum experiments. From this perspective, the microcosm

mirrors the unpredictable reality in the macrocosm and the two are not separate. We’ve been

looking at things backwards.

Isn’t it more reasonable to posit that the combination of all possible human decisions and

indecision, actions and inaction are responsible for these myriad uncertainties observed at the

quantum level? Is our individual perception of reality actually the current collective product of

conscious choices up to any point in time? Through Truth’s immutability, the answer is yes to

both of these questions, which means that there is only one reality – one universe – with

myriad possibilities at every trillionth of a second or less.

We are failing to see the overriding metaphysical nature to our existence. A gigantic collective

consciousness of everyone alive and all who have died in this epoch is directly responsible for

the metaphysics that shapes the entire reality around us. This demonstrates that the earth is

not separate from us even though we may think it is. Nothing is random or happenstance even

though we may perceive it to be.

The current problem in quantum physics is the claims that there are separate laws for reality in

the Quantum realm. I subscribe to the simple fact that Truth is Universal so it is our

perceptions that need adjustment.


23 | P a g e

Let’s delve a little further into this to discuss the third and most important principle of the

Metaphysics of Truth. In all examples where choice creates an outcome, whether collectively

or individually, we see action and consequence.

If we look closer we find that Truth isn’t just being discovered, it is manifesting itself. This

demonstrates an awakening to Truth through experiences in physical reality – sometime

unpleasant – or by heeding our inner voice of wisdom, which could prevent us from undesired

consequences. This brings us to the fundamental principle of the Metaphysics of Truth and the

sublime secret.

The Truth is always trying to reveal itself to us. The inseparable bond implies that every action

has a consequence and the consequence is Truth’s incessant Nature to be made manifest. It is

extremely subtle, albeit very powerful, and that is why we fail to recognize it. Skeptics will

certainly argue this point but further observation proves the Will of Consciousness is to become

completely and perfectly expressed in the physical realm.

Laird Scranton is an expert on the study of Dogon cosmology and their symbolic similarities to

ancient Egypt, where evidence clearly indicates an unrelated culture of mentors who served

ancient humans with advanced metaphysical teachings. The importance of his discoveries to

my work is instrumental in proving the ancient knowledge of this non-material force as well as a

mentoring source culture, which will also help to clarify the UFO phenomenon.

The mythical teachers of the Dogon were known as the Nummo, and the

belief is that they were originally non-material, but somehow able to

manifest and take action within a material frame. A highly guarded

Buddhist counterpart to the concept is given as two hugging Ganeshas,

symbolic of an embrace between the non-material and the material

domains. At the root of these concepts is the notion of a primordial

sibling-like attachment between the non-material and material domains.

By one ancient cosmological metaphor, the processes of creation are

compared to the act of a sleeping goddess, who opens her eyes and

perceives the material world. By another, they are compared to a

creator-god who opens his mouth and speaks a word. These sorts of

parallel metaphors are reflective of a symbolic system, whose meanings

seem to have been aimed at a future audience, and whose potential

frame of reference was uncertain.


24 | P a g e

Knowledge is power and yet it remains a subset of All-Truth. We can travel to anywhere in the

world in less than a day. We can speak to anyone in the world at the speed of light. We can

build huge ships, skyscrapers, trains, rockets and vehicles of many sorts. Today’s amazing

technology is the power of collective knowledge – not collective consciousness – made

manifest right before our eyes.

Absolute Knowledge (Omniscience) is Absolute Power (Omnipotence), which constantly shapes

events and circumstances to reveal the errors in our beliefs and bring us closer to Omniscience.

The Nature or Will of Truth is to incessantly reveal itself. We cannot ignore this subtle but

easily observed force any longer.

The most puzzling question to scientists is the origin of life itself. Science still cannot determine

whether the seed or the plant arrived first, nor can it tell us whether the chicken or the egg

came first. The very fundamental property of life cannot be created in a laboratory and science

has no answer for it except more ridiculous rebuttals akin to the search for UFO’s. The problem

is that the presumptuous nature of science is overshadowed by dogmatic religious claims and

the failure to provide a viable alternative. In both camps we are failing to observe the most

subtle but important law of Nature.

Inside every living thing is a subtle but powerful non-material force, the Essence of All-Truth,

Cosmic Consciousness, Spirit, God or whatever we wish to call it – the answers to everything.

It’s an infinite and infinitesimal furnace of Power (Omnipotence) that incessantly manipulates

matter to create vehicles of life for the sole purpose of becoming completely and perfectly

expressed in the physical world. The beauty of Nature is the subtle reminder of this process.

Is the brain a producer of conscious awareness or a product of Consciousness itself?


25 | P a g e

David Eagleman, a neuroscientist and brain researcher tells us unequivocally that reality as we

perceive it is only an illusion and that the brain shapes our reality by analyzing and separating

patterns of countless stimuli. Within the context presented in this treatise, we see the

magnificent brain as a product of this underlying force to manifest itself rather than the

producer of an emergent and limited conscious awareness.

The reality we see and believe to be real is actually an illusion that continually changes. It

doesn't change quickly enough for us to recognize the illusion. But if we were to put

humanity’s history into a quick time-lapse photography, we would see the world change before

our very eyes almost instantaneously. The problem is in the time constraint of our perception.

Science also tells us that time is an illusion, yet we still perceive the flow of time. We can

measure it and differentiate between yesterday and today. A question to ask is whether or not

time is merely the measurable distance between thought and creation or consciousness and

physical reality or the non-material and the material.

Everything begins as an illusion or vision in someone’s mind. © 2013 Matthew Petti

Think about this: all things (outside of nature) begin as an illusion or vision in someone's mind.

The metaphysical process is such that humans “create” things by the manipulation of the


26 | P a g e

physical realm through thought and processes, which are also developed by the mind over a

period of time. We have simplified those processes and reduced the time to create things over

the millennia, but we still fail to recognize the actual mental manipulation of our world.

Although we haven’t achieved higher levels they are merely advanced levels of the same

phenomena that we are failing to observe today.

The closer we get to the Supreme State, the less time between thought and creation. Here we

see perfection as timeless – no past and no future, which implies that Consciousness is Timeless

and that we have the potential to express that timelessness in ourselves. Time, like physical

reality is an illusion, which is posited clearly in quantum mechanics. It begs us to ask, how it can

at all be possible to travel backwards and forwards within an illusion. Time is only a reminder

of our imperfection.

Someday, we will achieve superhuman capabilities and our mental-physical manipulation will

far surpass our imagination, which will bring us closer to realizing the Quantum Truth of our

world, which we believe to be a separate physical reality today. The things we would deem

miraculous today are really the expression of a future potential we cannot fathom at this time.

Scientific inquiry continues to dismiss either the existence or presence of a non-material force,

and in their more recent attempt to express it mathematically, they are trying to break it down

to a form of matter, when it clearly isn’t.

The discoveries of quantum physics are revealing to us, through Truth’s immutability, the

simple truth that the world we deem to be real is only an illusory snapshot of an ever-changing

reality. And by adding the easily observed principles of the Metaphysics of Truth we see reality

as the product of a delicate balance between two forces: the power of collective human will,

born of shortsighted beliefs, and the power of Truth’s inherent Will or Nature to become

perfectly expressed, because Will is the Nature of Consciousness. Once again, all answers rest

in the most important principle to the Metaphysics of Truth. The Truth is always trying to

reveal itself.

Is human synergy possible? Human synergy is very possible and it would be the most

marvelous. The conundrum is that only conscious and thinking human beings with a prioritized

collective will can completely and perfectly express the Essence. Sentience and intuition were

the final elements of creation and they are both the hindrance and the tools for this remarkable

accomplishment in human beings.

In fact, my argument centers on the fact that we once had this collective ability, which was

given to us by a source-culture and I will get to this in more detail in a moment. To me it is the


27 | P a g e

only way to explain the megalithic mysteries and the worldwide – not just biblical – Tower of

Babel legend, when advanced collective human telepathic and telekinetic capabilities were

suddenly lost throughout the world.

We cannot reach our maximum potential as individuals and we cannot become a truly

advanced society without first collectively agreeing on basic Truths. If we really want to

progress, we need to spark human synergy with a collective cause and purpose before we can

even think about higher levels.

Imagine waking up one morning into a state of complete amnesia—our mind being completely

blank with no thoughts whatsoever. We wouldn’t be able to recognize our being or anything

around us. All we’d have is our five physical senses, and no thoughts to associate or recognize

anything we would see, hear, feel, taste or smell. Think about this for a moment. Does a

scenario like this frighten you?

This is the exact scenario of our infancy. At the earliest days of infancy, a human being is more

closely united to the core of our existence than at any other time in life. If we can agree that

Spirit exists, then at our infancy we are bound only to true Spirit or Consciousness, because we

haven’t yet been subjected to the limits of our five senses. That’s why children are inherently

capable of learning things very quickly. I’ll venture to say that only the inherent ignorance

prevents a child from realizing and exercising the Absolute Power he or she is born with.

As our awareness grows, concepts and definitions become the product of inheritance from

those whose awareness had also completely smothered the Truth to our existence and true

nature. It seems to be a never-ending cycle of birth into a limited world, but we can change

that. The reason meditation is such an ancient tradition is because ancients knew that

meditation is a means toward completely releasing everything ever induced by any of the five

senses in our lifetime.


28 | P a g e

We must see the world like we did at infancy to be a true Master. Courtesy

http://yogaandmeditation.org/.

In order to be a true Master and get in touch with the Essence of our being, objects must be

seen, but without shape, color, texture or any definition – a fluid reality as viewed from the

eyes of an infant. Concepts of time, love, hate, fear, hope, anxiousness and guilt, worry,

vengeance, empathy and sympathy, happiness, sadness, judgment and scores of other

emotional feelings MUST be nonexistent. This is a very difficult task.

A true Master is one who sheds the reality of our five physical senses and becomes linked – like

an infant – to the Essence that exists within us. An infant doesn’t shed the reality of the five

senses because they are non-existent at that age. Reality appears fluid to both but only bends

at the will of true Master because infants cannot bend what is unknown to be solid. This is the

basis for realizing what the true power and synergy of Masters and their Collective

Consciousness would present and the key to solving the mystery of a previous super society

and the ancient megalithic mysteries.

http://yogaandmeditation.org/


29 | P a g e

Clear indication to this limitless power is found in the meanings for Christ’s words, “…to enter

the Kingdom, we must all return and be like these children…”

How many of us remember Uri Geller and his power of telekinesis? I truly believe that some

people are mysteriously linked to certain abilities we connect with as infants and they never

leave us. Even though I wouldn’t classify Geller as a Master, he is living proof that telekinesis is

not science fiction and fantasy. The spoon bends because it really isn't solid! Only by releasing

all of our learned concepts – as a true guru does at the highest levels of meditation – can we

see reality for what it truly is: a fluid and quantum illusion with no shape, substance, density or

color, which bends at the will of a Master.

PART III: Alpha and Omega – ET’s or Lost Human Potential

Award-Winning book by Matthew Petti © 2012

Imagine a world of collective synergistic Masters and we will begin to see the Super Society that

long-preceded us and seeded us and to which nearly a thousand worldwide flood-legends

claim. We will understand the mysteries of the ancient megaliths. We will begin to see the


30 | P a g e

presumptuousness of technology and scientific materialism in a world that sacrifices its

resources and environment to create machines. We will envision a lost and separate culture of

ancients – the survivors and offspring of a previous Super Society – who tried to teach us these

very same things and which we are failing miserably to understand.

What is our destiny? We will either become extinct, or we will one day reach the pinnacle of

human achievement – the highest level of human existence on earth – Supreme Being – when

the light of the Essence within us is completely and perfectly reflected throughout us. This is

what is known as the Great Awakening, Apocalypse or the return of the Master Christ in all of

us – the Omega and final Revelation of All-Truth and a huge reduction of time’s restriction on

our perception.

Now we can see our sole purpose – the only reason for our existence – is to discover and align

ourselves to this underlying force –Truth, God, Spirit, Consciousness, Essence, or Light – so that

our reality will manifest our collective clarity in a world we know as Supreme rather than the

current reality that mirrors our shortsighted and divided collective beliefs today.

If we accept that collective perfection is reflected by a perfect reality – symbolically Paradise –

then we can further accept that monster storms, volcanoes, earthquakes and even celestial

events are not random but instead the physical reflection of the confusion in the collective

consciousness. Keep in mind that everything is a constantly changing illusion.

This also helps us to see the extreme significance in the myth of Atlantis. If we’re able to

conceive the possibility of Supreme human accomplishment someday in the future, why can’t

we acknowledge it as a real place somewhere in the very distant past? Tales the world over

echo the story of a previous civilization. Did a remotely ancient Super Society precede ours?

This is extremely important in understanding the UFO phenomenon.

Nearly every culture on earth is linked to a flood legend depicting a society that was completely

destroyed because of their avarice and wrongful deeds. Well over 700 deluge legends are

found the world over from Europe to Asia to North America and South America, Australia, the

Pacific Islands, Africa and the near East. Tales include American Indian and ancient Hindu and

Chinese legends as well. These stories had spread by oral tradition and became embedded in all

parts of the globe long before writing, mass communication or religious influence.

The majority of the legends claim that merely a handful of people survived in a vessel of sorts,

in order to start a new civilization. The flood story in Genesis centers on the same central

theme. Today it is largely believed these stories are fairy tales because they cannot be

explained within our current thought-models. Why is it hard to see that the earliest and most


31 | P a g e

indelible memory of human existence on earth is consistently and uniformly telling us that we

are the offshoot of a previous and highly advanced civilization?

In the earliest pages of the book of Genesis we observe life spans of nearly 1000 years before

the flood.

Thus all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years; and he died. (Genesis 5:5)

Only in the Apocalypse are humans depicted with a similar lifespan in the 1000-year post-

Armageddon society – the time when mankind will know All-Truth without mistaken beliefs at

the end of mankind’s journey – the Omega.

They came to life and reigned with Christ a thousand years. (Revelation 20:4)

Instead of the popularized linear model of human evolution and progress, envision a cyclical

model – Alpha to Omega – that begins and ends with timeless human perfection. This model

offers unseen clues for deciphering our mysterious history and ancient texts.

All of the earliest written records – Sumerian, Vedic and Pyramid texts – curiously depict gods,

flood legends, the afterlife and the supernatural. These and later records were perused,

collated and carefully selected by a consortium of leaders as the basis for the Pentateuch,

which arrived 2500 years after the earliest written records and served as the first organized and

widely accepted chronology of history by 600 BC (http://matthewpetti.com/excerpts/the-

history-of-history/).

Most important is that the advent of writing in 3100 BCE emerged at least 7000 years after

undeniable evidence for advanced human ability. Who were the gods that mentored our

ancestors of this new epoch long before recorded information? The popular Table of Nations is

the family tree of Noah and each person is curiously named for different regions of the world.

http://matthewpetti.com/excerpts/the-history-of-history/

http://matthewpetti.com/excerpts/the-history-of-history/


32 | P a g e

Could the Table of Nations actually be a list of gods similar to those found in the legends of

ancient history throughout the world? © Matthew Petti 2012

Notably, we find in Genesis that direct descendants of Noah were living nearly a thousand years

while Abraham and his descendants were only living a hundred, which places two different

cultures of people on earth after the flood. This helps us to demonstrate how a separate

culture of advanced flood survivors – removed in time by an entirely different epoch – may

have served as the gods of ancient historical myth. Japheth, one of the biblical sons of Noah, is

very similar in context to the ancient god Japetos, a renowned forefather of Greek mythology.

Even the earliest Greek historical accounts depict ancient gods while Egyptian historians of the

same period depict gods reigning long before Pharaohs. These facts are compelling enough to

provide evidence for a previous civilization that preceded, seeded and mentored ours. It’s easy

to see how our interpretations of ancient records are built upon our inherited but prejudiced

assumptions and that they need to change globally.

However, all of the flood stories have been mostly disregarded because the prevailing

presumption is that Noah’s flood occurred somewhere around 6000 years ago and thus easily

debunked by science. The date of the flood was never mentioned in Genesis but the time

period was later presented by 20th century theological interpretations claiming 4004 BC as the

beginning of time.


33 | P a g e

Conversely, archaeology and geology hold firmly that a cataclysmic world flood never happened

anywhere in the historical record going back a million years or more. Yes, water levels have

risen over the last 15,000 years or so, but evidence for either a sudden inundation or complete

annihilation of our species does not exist in the current fossil record. Yet it remains the

underlying message in all ancient accounts, including the bible. Moreover, our presumptuous

nature leads us to extract a message different from the one intended.

In light of this, the contentious scientific and religious viewpoints are equally narrow-minded.

Religious claims have become dogmatic because they can’t explain the flood story without

scientific conflict. The general acceptance is that a huge ship saved humans similar to us from a

flood in very recent history.

Although science can sufficiently challenge the intolerant interpretations of biblical text,

they’ve created a flawed model of their own, which renders the Genesis account and other

ancient texts as creations of superstitious humans of the early Bronze Age. Here is where we

can see how we’ve become polarized by two equally biased world-views, both of which stem

from the argument caused by the misinterpretation of Genesis in regards to time and human

capability.

The reason we need to consider such a large gap in time between two civilizations is due to the

problem that emerges when trying to explain advanced human capabilities about 10,000 years

ago. Fossil evidence of morphological changes and physical adaptations has been the most

convincing data demonstrating that Homo sapiens likely existed approximately 200,000 years

ago and were able to control fire. The overwhelming evidence in the fossil record, which

demonstrates gradual human progress, cannot be ignored.

An alternative assessment for our history, should clearly demonstrate the complete

annihilation of humans in a cataclysmic flood of a previous epoch, which is depicted in all of the

earliest texts of the new epoch including Genesis. Most important however is recognizing a

separate but Supreme Civilization of humans who lived for 1000 years.

Only a scant few of them were able to bridge the gap in time and seed the new civilization,

which is clearly depicted in the Genesis story insofar as the theme goes, as well as in nearly all

of the earliest flood legends throughout the world. An alternative history theory doesn’t work

unless we provide for another advanced source culture, which helps to explain all of the

mysteries of our past in a consistent manner and without the necessity for the ancient alien

theory.


34 | P a g e

The evidence is overwhelming for an advanced civilization – exceedingly far removed in time –

that seeded our civilization, mated with the earliest Egyptians, served as peaceful gods and

coexisted with early humans for thousands of years all over the world long before recorded

history.

Suddenly, the Palermo Stone, Abydos Kings list, Turin Papyrus and the Vedic texts, all of which

purport gods reigning on earth for thousands of years before writing, can be viewed as viable

evidence rather than the ignored ramblings of primitive humans. Manetho’s Aegyptiaca

(History of Egypt) depicts a list of gods and demigods reigning for 17,520 years prior to any

Pharaoh, which places gods and humans together at 21,000 BC. All of the ancient Greek and

Egyptian mythologies depict the mating of gods with humans as well.

We need to acknowledge that ancient history is not something that any branch of science will

ever be able to rectify with certainty. The earth’s crust is 20 to 45 miles thick on the continents

and 3 to 6 miles thick in the ocean basins. The oceans have an average depth of almost three

miles with some of the deepest parts reaching almost 7 miles. Assertions that would contradict

this theory are baseless. If we want to get to the truth, then we must acknowledge the ignored

evidence on the surface and develop a theory to address it.

This model also proposes a few very important and pressing questions. The biggest question is

explaining how the few survivors bridged the huge gap in time – possibly four to seven million

years – to accomplish this task? I think the main reason for dismissing this concept is because it

seems there is no way to explain it without accepting what we have learned in this treatise. It is

fully addressed with consistency in Alpha to Omega and not pertinent here except to say that

the ARC was not a boat but something that bridged the gap – just like a rainbow – between two

points in time and two completely different civilizations.


35 | P a g e

PART IV: Critical Inferences – Atlantis UFO’s and the Cosmic Battle

There are still a couple of very important questions. How is it possible for a Supreme Society to

become extinct within the model being presented here? Why would only a handful of Super

Humans want to survive and spawn a new civilization? These two questions get to the very

heart of The Metaphysics of Truth, the cosmic battle and the mystery of UFO’s.

In our current reality the delicate metaphysical balance between human Will and the Will of

Essence is maintained because we are not held accountable for the things we never knew.

Ignorance reigns in a world that began without knowledge. In Alpha to Omega, this is discussed

in greater detail and is used to explain the unprecedented metaphysical meaning to the Four

Horsemen of the Apocalypse, and the Christ Principle.

The term original sin is indicative of a new but ignorant civilization evolving from the death and

decay of those who were only a few steps removed from Supreme. If the balance should

become askew today, and indications suggest this is going to happen soon, then the world

could be faced with a rush of harsh experiences.

In the Alpha to Omega model, we accept that a Collective Will must be aligned with the Will of

the Essence to be expressed perfectly. At this level everything is synergistic and in perfect

harmony as the power of the Collective Consciousness works through everyone for everyone’s

benefit. As to how the civilization reached this point, we may never know, but Plato described

it best.

Let me tell you then why the creator made this world of generation. He

was good, and the good can never have any jealousy of anything. And

being free from jealousy, he desired that all things should be as like

himself as they could be. This is in the truest sense the origin of creation

and of the world, as we shall do well in believing on the testimony of wise

men: God desired that all things should be good and nothing bad, so far

as this was attainable. Wherefore also finding the whole visible sphere

not at rest, but moving in an irregular and disorderly fashion, out of

disorder he brought order, considering that this was in every way better

than the other. Now the deeds of the best could never be or have been

other than the fairest; and the creator, reflecting on the things which

are by nature visible, found that no unintelligent creature taken as a

whole was fairer than the intelligent taken as a whole; and that

intelligence could not be present in anything which was devoid of soul.


36 | P a g e

For which reason, when he was framing the universe, he put intelligence

in soul, and soul in body, that he might be the creator of a work which

was by nature fairest and best. Wherefore, using the language of

probability, we may say that the world became a living creature truly

endowed with soul and intelligence by the providence of God. -Dialogues

of Plato from Mobile Reference

In a perfect world of Supreme Beings the Metaphysics of Truth applies as well. The difference is

that the Will of the Collective is aligned with the Will of Essence and is completely and perfectly

mirrored in the physical realm. A division at this echelon sets up two diametrically opposed

forces. Anything that interferes with Natural Intent creates an imbalance of Power, which must

be exponentially higher when sentient creatures, armed with Absolute Power, consider

personal motivations in decisions that may oppose Natural Intent and the Collective Will.

Keep in mind that conscious choice affects reality on every level. Here, the Metaphysics of

Truth remains consistent in describing the inevitable demise of the previous Super Society.

There is very little room for error in this arrangement, which implies that our current modes of

thought, beliefs and actions would never suffice in a Super Society.

Let’s assume that we discover that the world is soon to undergo an extinction level event. If

only a dozen could survive, would anyone want to be chosen to live in a desolate world alone

afterwards? The legendary tales from all over the world claim that only a few survivors were

left to repopulate the world. Why? What was the reason for wanting to take on such a nearly

impossible task?

If we can accept that a Supreme Race preceded us but missed its perfection because of one big

mistake, then the all-important task of mentoring a future civilization of ignorant people

heralds a much greater significance. If our purpose is to reach Supreme Being and live for 1000

years, what happens if we die before we achieve our full potential?

New perspectives for ancient Egypt, which are presented in Alpha to Omega, begin with the

notion that it was the source and center of the new world. The remarkable Egyptians were

exceedingly more spectacular than other societies throughout the world thousands of years

before the first Pharaoh in 3100 BCE. My arguments for that are well documented and have

been bolstered with more recent information, but are not relevant here.

Curiously, they believed strongly in immortality and the afterlife. They relished the soul and

spent their lives preparing for death always terrified by a legendary underworld. Why did they

believe this? Why was it embedded in their history even as writing emerged thousands of years


37 | P a g e

later? Superstition couldn’t play a part because, if this model is correct, then Egyptians knew

perfectly well what the mentor gods were teaching them.

This coffin belonged to a young child, whose name was Nefretiri. Egypt, New Kingdom 19th

Dynasty, 1220 BCE (State Museum of Egyptian Art, Munich, Germany). Courtesy of Osama Shukir

Muhammed Amin http://www.ancient.eu/image/3488/

Most people believe in the afterlife. It has been part of the human psyche since the earliest

writings of humanity. We cannot disregard it or write it off as superstitious nonsense simply

because we fail to understand it, but instead need to figure out its meaning in all of this. Many

believe we will be spiritually awakened and united with our loved ones after we die. This notion

has been more recently popularized by near-death experiences and the reported claims by

those who’ve encountered them. But, a near-death experience is not really death. What if the

All-Encompassing Light, which most people claim a part of their experience, shows itself in

death only to reveal the true darkness of our souls?

How can we justifiably expect to be awakened in death when the very act of death itself is

caused by our failure to become awakened in the physical realm? How can we assume that

because we may feel a distinct connection to another soul that we are the reincarnation of that

person? How can we look at Nature without seeing eternity etched into the very fabric of

reality and that life itself is eternal?


38 | P a g e

Answering these questions can only be answered in the clear context that our purpose is to

reach our full potential. Death is by no means an escape from a physical life and a world of war,

confusion and death, but a sure reckoning to Truth, which reveals our presumptuous nature

and the part we play in creating the very things we believe to be separate from us.

The afterlife is not peaceful because the Light reveals our soul’s true misgivings while the

simple things we failed to recognize become a constant torment. In a world where human

purpose has not been fulfilled, the afterlife is not a reward or respite. In the following scripture,

the white robes cover the darkened souls as they wait in anxious torment, but signify the

promise that torment will eventually end.

When he opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those

who had been slain for the word of God and for the witness they had

borne; they cried out with a loud voice, “O sovereign Lord, holy and true,

how long before thou will judge and avenge our blood on those who

dwell upon the earth?” Then they were each given a white robe and told

to rest a little longer, until the number of their fellow servants and their

brethren should be complete, who were to be killed as they themselves

had been (Rev 6: 9-11).

Pointing out the truth about the hereafter doesn’t sit well with many people but the notions of

a previous super society surely do. Looking closely, we can easily see inferences that the

afterlife was the primary motivation for a soon-to-be extinct civilization, which will lead us to

understanding the cosmic battle.

Imagine a near-perfect civilization about to be destroyed along with the understanding that

their souls would never complete the journey and would remain tormented in the hereafter, at

exponentially much higher levels because of the knowledge they had been given. They knew

the entire scenario was inescapable and thus a firm responsibility for their eternal souls who

would dwell in endless torment where every second is counted until Paradise was restored to

Earth. Their self-imposed, frantic and crucial mandate was to preserve the Truth with dire

hopes that a future civilization would reach an objective, which would likely never be

discovered without their intervention.

To conclude this presentation, we need to explain a scenario that could effectively present the

cosmic battle within the framework of these observations. I’m going to keep it simple here. We

explained the direct proportions between knowledge and power, which explicitly suggests that

an entity with more knowledge has proportionally more power. Implicitly, we understand that


39 | P a g e

an entity with more knowledge can withhold, manipulate and control things to which we aren’t

privy.

So, at the Supreme state of existence it would seem, at first glance, almost impossible for this

scenario to occur, but that isn’t true. I have exhibited that Supreme Being with adjunct power

is the highest of physical experience and beyond description. Yet, it pales in comparison to the

highest echelon of Angels in a nine-step hierarchy. Angel hierarchy has a history agreed upon

by most researchers. This, found in “The Testament of Adam” — part of the Gnostic texts

discovered in the 1950’s — was written somewhere between the 2nd and 5th century A.D.

The Angel Hierarchy describes the duties of each level and how they are involved in service to

the world. The orders, from lowest to highest, are:

1. Angels: One angel is assigned to every person to accompany that individual everywhere.

2. Archangels: They direct everything in creation according to the plan of God.

3. Archons: They govern the elements and the weather.

4. Authorities: They govern the celestial lights of the sun, moon, and stars.

5. Powers: They prevent the demons from destroying the world.

6. Dominions: They rule over earthly kingdoms and decide the outcome of wars.

7. Thrones: They stand before God and guard the gate of the holy of holies.

8. Cherubim: They stand before God and reverence his throne and keep the seals.

9. Seraphim: They stand before God and serve his inner chamber.

(The Encyclopedia of Angels, by Rosemary Ellen Guiley 2004)

Do Angels really exist? Biblical and other ancient references to Angels are plentiful. In the

model proposed here, these things were more understood in the many millennia before

writing, but were important enough to be recorded thousands of years after becoming

embedded in the human consciousness.

Angels do not have material bodies, but they are definite and discrete

beings; they are of spirit nature and origin. -The Urantia Book, Chicago,

1955 p. 419.


40 | P a g e

This associates the Angels with the non-material force or the Essence in varying degrees of

Light, for which the Urantia book provides a better description.

Light—spirit luminosity—is a word, symbol, a figure of speech, which

connotes the personality manifestation characteristic of spirit beings of

diverse orders. This luminous emanation is in no respect related either to

intellectual insight or to physical light manifestations. -The Urantia Book,

Chicago, 1955 p. 10.

Like all of the ancient texts, we find it hard to prove or understand because we take the ancient

sources lightly and without validation rather than the urgent messages they were intended to

be. In Alpha to Omega, we associate Angels with paraphysical abilities far exceeding what a

Master can do. A Master can bend reality, but an Angel is extra-dimensional, which can be

explained simply by the ability to move in and out of our three dimensional world while taking

on any form they so choose.

In the light of a higher intelligence and radiance, we find the secrets to Lucifer and how the

exalted Angel was capable of deceiving the Masters of the Supreme Society for his own agenda,

which puts him as the chief above all in the physical plane and affords him nearly limitless

control in a newly evolved world born of ignorance.

Then war broke out in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the

dragon. The dragon and his angels also fought, but he could not prevail,

and there was no place for them in heaven any longer. So the great

dragon was thrown out—the ancient serpent, who is called the devil and

Satan, the one who deceives the whole world. He was thrown to earth,

and his angels with him. (Rev. 12:7-17)

Lucifer’s reign depends solely upon the continued proliferation of deception and doing

whatever he can do to prevent mankind from reaching the Omega. And, lest we reach the

Omega, the souls of the previous society and all those who have died in this epoch remain in a

torment only they can fully understand. Meanwhile, Lucifer remains free from that torment but

confined to the earthly world in which he reigns.

These and similar notions continually affirm my long-standing belief that Angels, UFO’s and

demons are the same entities. Both are rarely seen or reported and remain obscure with a

multitude of descriptions and characteristics. Lucifer reigns on earth and the UFO’s are not ET’S

from another planet. Instead, he and his cohorts reside in the unseen places of the earth.


41 | P a g e

Would it help to reduce one’s skepticism if we could explain why Angels will not deliberately

heal our insufficiencies and create the Omega for us? It’s actually very simple and implied

clearly in this presentation that we are failing to observe the subtle but underlying non-material

force. To suddenly be thrust into a higher level by a possessor of this force interferes with its

Natural Intent towards self-discovery and therefore cannot be violated.

This is vital in understanding why Christ refrained from willfully sharing the Power he had

discovered after a lifetime of dedication and is exemplified in the third temptation. It also helps

us to understand the mysteries of the Beast in Revelation where provisions for the very same

Power that Christ understood to be dangerous will be unleashed in the final deception.

This may seem to give the upper hand to those of the Lucifer Rebellion because the hands-off

approach benefits his agenda. But the Metaphysics of Truth reminds us that the subtle but

powerful force continues relentlessly in its revelatory process. The delicate metaphysical

balance upholding our reality may very well be exclusive of the things we never knew but

certainly not exclusive of the things that are being deliberately withheld.

The delicate balance is soon to become askew on a colossal scale and when the smoke clears

the remaining earth’s inhabitants will be clamoring for a new and better world. Lucifer, who

once interfered with Natural Intent, will do so again in his last-ditch effort to retain his rule over

the physical realm while averting his eternal torment. This is the epoch-old cosmic battle and

the stage is set for the final act.

the ufo phenomenon - matthew petti · 2017. 4. 29. · mysteries, while nearly everyone knows about...

Documents