the treatment of intussusception
TRANSCRIPT
452
of supply and demand. Good nurses are not forthcoming atthe wages and conditions offered. The Metropolitan AsylumsBoard was confronted with the same difficulty in its
fever hospitals. It solved the difficulty by offering higherwages and better conditions of service and the Local Govern-
ment Board would be well advised to adopt similar means.In the interests alike of the medical profession, the public,and the Poor-law nursing service we feel bound to enter
our protest at the earliest moment against a retrograde pro-posal. A large section of the public is becoming impatient,at the non-solution of this important question of workhouse
nursing. The constitution of this departmental committeewas unsatisfactory, its recommendations carry but little
weight, and the time has come for a Royal Commission tobe appointed in order thoroughly to investigate the matter.
The Treatment of Intussusception.A TRULY remarkable series of cases of intussusception
- was recently met with at the London Hospital, where withinnine days seven cases of this condition were admitted intothe wards. They were all under the care of Mr. HUGH M.RIGBY who contributed a detailed account of them to
THE LANCET of Feb. 7th (p. 364). One of the seven
patients was in a moribund condition when admitted and
died four hours later, and therefore we need hardly con-sider that case, but the remaining six patients were
submitted to operation and of these five recovered. The
one fatal case required resection of a portion of the boweland this complication of the operation for intussusceptionis universally recognised as of the gravest prognosis.Within recent years the whole question of the treatment
of intussusception has undergone a great change and
an examination of the reasons for the adoption of
the present methods should be by no means devoid of
interest.
Not long after the pathology of intussusception was
investigated the idea of forcing back the invaginated bowel
by fluid pressure arose. The earlier attempts were madewith air which was forced in by means of a syringe ; laterliquids were employed, water being chiefly used, thougholive oil has been advocated. Hydrogen and carbonic acidgas have also had their supporters, there is a very obvious
limitation to the action of both inflation and injection andthis is imposed by the ileo-cascal valve. Any intussuscep-tion limited to the small bowel cannot be affected by thedistension of the large intestine, for distension of the caecumcloses the valve firmly. It is true that it has been demon-
strated that in excessive distension of the caecum some of
the contents may escape upwards through the valve, but
this can only happen to a slight extent and when the
distending force is very great. Therefore these methods are
possible only in some forms of intussusception. The treat.
ment by inflation, and especially by injection, did certainlysucceed in reducing some intussusceptions, and this was so,not only in slight cases, but even in extensive cases, as
in one recorded by Dr. E. MANSEL SYMPSON, where severalinches of bowel protruded from the anus. In what pro-
portion of cases methods of distension succeed cannot
definitely be stated, but the statistics collected by Dr.
F. HOLME WiGGIN of New York, which give the per-
centage of successes as 25, may be considered as not under-
estimating the beneficial results of the treatment. Dis-
tension of the colon, too, is not without danger, for numerouscases are on record in which rupture of the bowel has
occurred. Mr. R. LAWFORD KNAGGS has collected seven
cases in which this accident was encountered and no
wonder need be felt at the rupture of the bowel under theconditions in which distension is usually performed, for
in most cases no attempt is made to gauge the pressureexerted by the distending fluid. A syringe is usuallyemployed and the pressure exerted by the hand on the
syringe is a very poor index to the pressure in the bowel. A
curious fact is here of great importance, and that is that thesmaller the syringe employed the greater is the distendingforce. The quantity of the liquid injected is an equallyfallacious test of the pressure in the bowel, for Mr. D’DARCYPOWER has shown that the capacity of the colon varies
greatly in different children. Indeed, in one of the fatal
cases of rupture of the bowel only nine ounces of
water had been injected. The process of distension mayalso be very exhausting to the child, especially if it
has to be repeated, as is necessary sometimes when
this is the sole method of treatment employed. In some
cases the process has been repeated four or five times.
An important objection to the treatment by distension is
that it is often very difficult for the surgeon to be certain
that the reduction is complete, for so small a portionof bowel may remain invaginated that nothing can be felt
through the abdominal wall and yet a fatal issue may
follow. On the other hand, the surgeon may feel a
small swelling after distension has been practised and
may think that reduction has not been complete, thoughthe mass felt is only cedematous bowel.For these and other reasons there has been of recent years
a growing tendency to resort to abdominal section at an
early stage of a case of intussusception. Even in the pasta laparotomy frequently followed unsuccessful attempts at
distension, but these unsuccessful attempts had been oftenso energetic and persistent that the severe exhaustion
that had been induced entirely precluded the possibilityof a successful result following the abdominal section.
Mr. JONATHAN HuTCHINSON’S case recorded in the fifty-seventh volume of the Medico-Chirargieal Transactions
appears to have been the first successful case in this
country, though one had occurred in France towards the
end of the eighteenth century. Since Mr. HUTCHINSON’S
case in 1871 many others have been recorded ; still failures
far outnumbered successes and, indeed, laparotomy for
intussusception had fallen into a certain degree of dis-
repute. With the development of abdominal surgery the con-fidence of the surgeon in the comparative harmlessness of a
laparotomy developed, and the abdomen was opened for thetreatment of this condition with less and less hesitation.
Still, however, the mortality continued high, and it was seenthat no small share of the blame was to be attributed to the
exhaustion produced by the previous attempts at reduction.Abdominal section was therefore gradually performed at anearlier stage, until it was found that the best results were
obtainable in those cases where little or no previous attemptsat distension had been made, and at the present time recourse
453
to injection or inflation is gradually falling into disuse, andtheir place is being taken by laparotomy. The results
justify the change and the series of cases recently treated atthe London Hospital, to which we have already referred,clearly demonstrate the value of a primary abdominal sectionin intussusception. It is essential to distinguish in pre-
paring statistics between secondary laparotomy, where thecase has been previously treated by distension, and primarylaparotomy, in which no other remedial measures have been
employed. A confusion of these two classes will utterlyvitiate the conclusions from any series of cases. The ease
with which the invaginated gut can generally be with-
drawn after the abdomen has been opened is trulymarvellous, but in this, as in all other forms of acute in-
testinal obstruction, much depends on the duration of the
symptoms and the tightness of the constriction. If several
days have elapsed and the inclosed bowel is tightlynipped, peritoneal adhesions will have fixed it, and it
may be impossible to withdraw it. In such circumstances
the prognosis cannot fail to be very grave whatever
method of treatment be adopted. Fortunately these com-
plications are exceptional, especially in cases treated early,and therefore we may hope for even better results with a
growing recognition on the part of the public of the
importance of early treatment.
May it then be said that distension should never be
attempted ? The treatment of an analogous condition,
strangulated hernia, will furnish the answer. Formerlywhen a hernia became strangulated severe and protractedtaxis was frequently employed for its reduction with
disastrous results to the patient ; now the routine treat-
ment is an immediate herniotomy, but this may harm-
lessly be preceded by a single gentle attempt at reduc-tion if the strangulation is recent. So is it too with
intussusception. Laparotomy is the best method by whichto treat this condition, but a single gentle attempt atdistension in recent cases which are confined to the largeintestine and not of an acute type may be performed with
impunity. One condition, however, is essential. The
pressure in the colon must be absolutely under control, andthis can only be effected by employing a liquid as the dis-
tending agent and using a funnel and rubber tube to intro.duce it. If the funnel be raised not more than two feet
above the level of the patient the pressure will not exceedone pound on the square inch, and this pressure is probablyperfectly safe. The attempt should be made under an
anaesthetic and should it fail laparotomy can be immediatelyproceeded with, while the surgeon will feel sure that he hasnot by this gentle distension impaired the chance of successof his operative procedure.
The Royal Dental Hospital andits Anæsthetists.
THE entire staff of anassthetists of the Royal Dental
Hospital of London have been dismissed from their postsin circumstances which require consideration from us, andwe think that our readers will agree that the circumstances
also require more consideration than they have apparentlyreceived from the committee of management of the well-known hospital in Leicester-square. The story is briefly as
follows:-At the Royal Dental Hospital of London there
has lately been appointed an officer-and doubtless he hasproved a very useful officer-who is known as the dental
superintendent. His duty we find in a recent report of
the medical committee of the hospital defined as being"to supervise and direct the work of the demonstrators,the house surgeons, the curators, students, and pupils,and in the unavoidable absence of the anaesthetists to act as
their deputy " ; and the same report adds that his appoint-ment has proved an unmixed benefit to the hospital. In
October of last year the dental superintendent presented areport to the committee of management of the hospitalwhich is not in our hands, but which appears to have
attributed want of regularity and punctuality in the exerciseof their duties to some of the dental staff and some of the
administrators of anaesthetics attached to the hospital.This report was referred to and read at a meeting of
the medical committee without any special notice of its
contents being sent to the anaesthetists, who are, however,members of the medical committee; and as a result a
sub-committee was elected upon the suggestion of the
medical committee to consider the dental superintendent’sreport. The sub-committee was composed jointly of membersof the medical committee and members of the committee
of management, and reported to the committee of manage-ment ’’ that having regard to the enormous increase in thenumber of gas cases the sub-committee is of opinion thatthe best way of dealing efficiently with the problem is bythe appointment of two paid anaesthetists in place of thepresent honorary anaesthetic staff." " The report also definedthe hours of attendance of the medical staff and concluded
thus :-"that the members of the anaesthetic staff be thanked
for their services and be made honorary governors of the
hospital and that the two seniors be elected consultinganesthetists to the institution." This last clause amount,in our view, to dismissal of the anaesthetists of the hospitaland, it may be noted, without any marked expressionof gratitude for past services. The report was adoptedby resolution of the committee of management without
being submitted to the medical committee, and was at onceembodied in a circular letter and despatched to the anæs-
thetists of the hospital, the majority of whom received it
with complete surprise. Perhaps the anaesthetists may havebeen, as the sub-committee’s report comically calls them, an"anajsthetic staff " not to suspect what was in the wind, but
they did not. Some two years ago, at the time, we believe,that the dental superintendent was appointed, dissatisfactionwas expressed with the way in which the anaesthetists
rendered their services, but this had not prepared them for adismissal en bloc, with only a formal word of thanks and no
regretful phrase.Such is the story. There are several points of a personal
nature which may arise in the discussion of this unfortunate
affair, but we intend to do our best to consider the
matter wholly on the broad grounds of the good of the
public and of the dignity of the medical profession. The
committee of management proposes to make an immediatealteration in the regulations of the hospital which we arequite ready to believe is intended as a measure of reform,but which seems to us to constitute a possible danger to thepublic and to display scant respect for an important body of