the threat to forests and climate from burning forest biomass ......2020/04/07 · fagaras...
TRANSCRIPT
The threat to forests and climate from burning forest biomass
Mobilizing comments to the EU on the 2030 Climate Target Initiative
Webinar
Mary S. Booth
Partnership for Policy Integrity
April 7, 2020
Partnership for Policy Integrity
Mary S. Booth, PhD, Director
Ecosystem scientist by training
Founded PFPI in 2010 to work on biomass energy impacts
PFPI website for information on biomass impacts on forests, the climate, and air quality: www.pfpi.net
Suit filed in EU court to eliminate forest biomass as “zero carbon” renewable energy: www.eubiomasscase.org
2
Goal of the EU’s 2030 Climate Target Plan initiative
EU sees itself as global leader on climate change mitigation; wants “climate neutrality” by 2050. (Paris Agreement Article 4: “achieve a balance between anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks of greenhouse gases in the second half of this century”)
EU needs ambitious action now to create a glide-path to 2050 target.
Current target: Cut GHG emissions by at least 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. (Not aggressive enough!) Proposed target now considered: Cut emissions by 50% or 55% below 1990 levels by 2030. Requires “a significant step-up of ambition in the short term”; raising the target “in a responsible way.”
Everything is on the table! EU is revisiting old and new legislation and regulations to ensure they serve a more aggressive target, including those with relevance to bioenergy: • Emissions Trading System Directive (ETS) • Effort Sharing Regulation (ESR); • Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry Regulation (LULUCF regulation); • Renewable Energy Directive (RED)
Action on climate must not come at the expense of forests!
4
To avoid climate catastrophe, we need to decrease emissions and increase carbon uptake in forests NOW
Fuss et al, 2015. Betting on Negative Emissions. Nature.
Livable scenarios
when
What a pathway to net zero emissions looks like (“climate neutrality”)
Forest carbon uptake is increasing, meaning it’s getting more negative. Forests are getting bigger
Fossil fuel emissions are decreasing
Net emissions are decreasing
BUT: Wood-fired electricity and heating units emit more CO2 per unit energy output than fossil-fired units
6
Electricity power plants
Boilers for heating
All results are for power plants and wood-boilers burning green wood chips for fuel. Green wood is ~50% water by weight, thus inefficient. Requires burning more fuel to generate a given amount of energy.
Page 42
Page 31
Coal: 6,021 kt CO2 ÷ 6.9 TWh = 873 kt CO2 /TWh
Biomass: 11,455 kt CO2 ÷ 12.7 TWh = 902 kt CO2 /TWh (equivalent to kg/MWh)
Burning pellets emits more CO2 than coal per unit energy – data from Drax Power Station, UK
Despite emissions, biomass treated as “zero” CO2 in the Renewable Energy Directive and the Emissions Trading
Scheme
8
Power plants that burn wood have “zero” emissions… Households that burn wood have “zero” emissions…
Carbon loss may be counted if forest carbon sequestration shrinks
EU Climate policy already relies too much on bioenergy
EU “solid biofuels” mostly wood; large increase since 1990
Of total wood burned for energy, residential use ~60%*
* Residential wood use and total wood use likely significantly underreported by Eurostat
Total wood burned for energy
Residential wood burned for energy
Residential as % of total
What a pathway to net zero emissions looks like (“climate neutrality”)
Forest carbon uptake is increasing, meaning it’s getting more negative. Forests are getting bigger
Fossil fuel emissions are decreasing
Net emissions are decreasing
Factors that degrade forest carbon sequestration
• Forest harvesting for materials and energy (“biomass”)
• Increased mortality/damage and decreased regeneration from climate stress: heat, drought, ice storms, abrupt changes in temperature
• Insect infestations
• Ozone pollution (damages foliage)
• Other air pollution (nitrogen deposition, metals, acidification)
Forest loss shows up in the forest sink, which is declining
Initiative text: “The EU’s land use sector (agriculture land, forests and other natural land) is presently a net sink of CO2, meaning that it removes more CO2 from the atmosphere than it releases GHGs.” But “balance” implies sources and sinks must be equal in the future. Currently, land sink offsets tiny (and currently decreasing) fraction of emissions.
• Forest carbon sink is declining
• Some countries have seriously degraded their forest carbon sink
• Decline in sink relates to harvesting, including for biomass fuel
EU forests are in trouble! Forest harvesting versus the forest carbon sink (thousand tonnes CO2)
CO2 all wood harvesting CO2 from burning wood CO2 sequestered in forests
EU forests are in trouble! Forest harvesting versus the forest carbon sink (thousand tonnes CO2)
CO2 all wood harvesting CO2 from burning wood CO2 sequestered in forests
Actual biomass use
Gardanne plant, France (coal-to-biomass conversion burning chips)
Drax power station, UK 2019
Burned 7.05 million tonnes wood pellets, 12.795 m tonnes biogenic CO2
Subsidies £861.5 million (£2.36 million per day) 65% wood pellets from USA
Enviva pellet plant, Ahoskie, North Carolina Photo: Dogwood Alliance (www.dogwoodalliance.org)
20
Pellet industry harvesting in North Carolina: “Little remains but stumps and puddles in what was once a bottomland hardwood forest”
Joby Warrick, Washington Post 6/2/2015 “How Europe’s climate policies led to more U.S. trees being cut down”
Pacific Bioenergy pellet plant, British Columbia, Canada
The North American forest carbon sink is in trouble
22
year
Canada: 30% less carbon sequestered compared to 1990
US: Slight decrease in carbon sequestration since 1990; troubling indications
Data from https://di.unfccc.int/detailed_data_by_party
“Sustainable” harvesting for wood pellets in Estonia
23
Estonian wood pellet mill
Biomaxx Pellets from Serbia
German Pellets. German pellets with state-of-the-art technology
GMG Energie HolzPellet. Quality pellets from Austria.
Eco Energ Lemn, from Romania, perhaps the country's largest factory with an annual output of 60,000 tonnes. It is located to the north in a timber-rich area. The material is 90% beech and 10% coniferous.
Forest Enterpises Pellet. Serbian Beech Pellets. The primary materials used are Beech and Pine.
Ahira Pellet. Bulgarian pellets. Production from the Rhodope Mountains.
Biotherm Pellet. Guaranteed pellets from Serbia! This pellet is mainly produced from beech, the dominant wood in the Balkans, but also from a percentage of conifers for flame intensity and better compression.
Ameco.AMECO started operations in 2007 in Romania. The pellet is produced from spruce and contains no bark at all.
Sava Pellet. Sava Pellet is produced in Bosnia by Ensa BH Ltd. The company has two mixes of materials for pellets 70% conifer and 30% beech
Bioenergy Point, Serbia. The material from which it is produced is beech.
Schweighofer. This pellet is known for its good combustion, for its color and for its noble Austrian origin. The company is actually based in Vienna, but its production is in Romania. The wood used is pure Romanian fir.
https://bit.ly/37fiqog
Residential wood pellet trade is booming - examples from one random
website
Firewood processing factory, Spain
Firewood is being shipped all over the EU
Spanish kiln-dried firewood for sale in EU
2-m3 crates of Spanish kiln-dried firewood, selling into UK for € 140/ crate
Logging of 180-yr-old beech forest in Bükk National Park,
Hungary
“According to WWF, the approximately 600 m3 of timber produced is largely suitable only for low market value firewood or fiber due to the very high age of the trees.” https://index.hu/belfold/2019/05/06/bukk_fakivagas_wwf/
Illegal logging, Bükk National Park, Hungary (sign says “strictly protected area,” photographer: Csaba Bojtos
Logging in Poloniny National Park, Slovakia, photograph Tomas Vida
Fagaras Mountains Romania: satellite imagery shows logging is recent
Fagaras Mountains (Romania) logging
Photo: Andrei Ciurcanu, Agent Green
What you can do
Submit comments to the EU telling them we need climate policies that PUT FORESTS FIRST. Instructions next slides. Join the many groups that have signed on to the “Biomass Delusion” statement, at https://environmentalpaper.org/the-biomass-delusion/
Tell policymakers:
The biodiversity crisis is intertwined with the climate crisis. Protecting and restoring forests is essential for addressing both.
Burning forests for fuel is destroying forests and harming the climate. Stopping this practice is FAST MITIGATION – which we desperately need.
We need a climate policy that puts forests first.
• End reliance on burning wood as “zero carbon” renewable energy
• Prioritize and incentivize protection and restoration of natural forests
• The EU spends billions per year on subsidies for cutting and burning wood - they should re-direct that support to restore forests.
Future GHG “reductions” must not come at the expense of forests!
Submit comments to the EU on the 2030 Climate Target Plan
Submit short comments or upload longer documents at https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12265-2030-Climate-Target-Plan Requires signing up for an account if you don’t have one yet – do this first
Comments are due APRIL 15th
Respond to the EU’s questionnaire
Deadline June 23 https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12265-2030-Climate-Target-Plan/public-consultation
Some resources for responding to the EU initiative
Many thanks to our colleagues in the Netherlands who have done an amazing job of assembling a comprehensive library of resources on bioenergy!
See their main website here: https://biomassmurder.org/
See videos here: https://biomassmurder.org/videos/index.html
PFPI submissions to previous EU consultations
Comments on revisions to carbon trading scheme and need to include bioenergy emissions
Suggestions for improving tracking of bioenergy impacts in the land sector
Suggestions on reducing forest degradation from bioenergy
Suggestions on reducing illegal logging and role of bioenergy
Suggestions on achieving climate neutrality by 2050 – how bioenergy undermines mitigation
Mary S. Booth
Websites: www.pfpi.net
www.eubiomasscase.org