the supreme court. source of power judicial review –process of determining if a law is...
TRANSCRIPT
The Supreme Court
Source of Power
• Judicial Review– Process of determining if a law is
constitutional-local, state, national• Deal with local or state if there is proof they
violate the constitution e.g. school dress codes in 60’s
• Over 100 federal laws have been declared unconstitutional in the past 200 years-not many-close to 1000 passed each year
Interpretation of a law’s meaning
• Laws often written in vague language which can be interpreted in different ways– “separate but equal”
• Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Ed. of Topeka, KS
– New Miranda strengthening-”you have the right to…”
• Precedent-how earlier courts have interpreted the issue
Functions
• Terms– 8 months/yr
• In session two weeks/month-”sittings”– Attorneys present both sides of case
• Roe v. Wade
– During two-week recesses justices conduct research on case issues
• Looking for precedents
– When ready, justices issue an opinion (may take years)
• Statement of decision and why• Often minority opinions if a justice feels strongly
• How cases get to the Supreme Court– Certain cases start at the SC they are their only
jurisdiction as per Constitution• Representatives of foreign governments (diplomatic
immunity)• Cases in which a state is a party
– All others arrive by appeal on a “Writ of Certiorari”-the Court requests the case from a lower court
• The SC can decide not to accept a case, in which case, the lower court ruling stands
– How do they decide which cases to accept• Potential cases screened by clerks put on discuss list-
Justices decide
• Steps in deciding a case– Briefs
• Written arguments and facts submitted by attorneys on both sides of a case
– Oral Arguments• Lawyers on each side are given 1 hour to make
their case
– Justices discuss case in conference-closed to all but justices-Chief Justice presides-may last 8 hours, then they call for vote. Majority needed to reach decision
– Important cases get a written opinion
Court Philosophy• Strict constructionist
– Strict interpretation of constitution-unless something is specifically stated, the power is not granted (Scalia, Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Kennedy)
• Activist– expanding scope of Constitution by
interpreting it more broadly (Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan, Sotomayor)