the structure and plasticity of the phenotype as a network phenomenon george kampis basler chair...
TRANSCRIPT
The Structure and Plasticity of the Phenotype as a
Network Phenomenon
George Kampis
Basler Chair Spring 2007, ETSU,
Johnson City, TN
Gene environment interaction
• Variability of expression (G)
• Plasticity of development (G x E)
• Variability of phenotype (E)
• Complete model (as large as the world)
• Here one segment, the organism
Historical/Autobiographical
• Waddington, C.H., ed. 1972. Towards a Theoretical Biology, vols. 1-4. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• 1970s-1980s: Biological Systems Theory• S. Kauffman, R. Rosen, H. Pattee, B. Goodwin, S.
Oyama, F.J. Varela…• Ridicule, e.g. • „deconstructivists of the gene” (Dennett 1995: DDI)
Kampis, G. 1991: Self-Modifying Systems: A New Framework for Dynamics, Information, and Complexity, Pergamon, Oxford-New York, pp 543+xix.
A down-to-Earth picture
Genes• 1970-1980: 10-100 million genes• 1985: 1 million genes• Human Genome Project: 100,000 genes• 2001: 30,000 genes• 2003: 20,000 genes
– Out of which Drosophila alone has 5,000
Gene products (PIM)• 1980-85: 1,000- x,000 E.Coli• 2003: 20,000 Drosophila• 2007: 35,000 (?) yeast
One sentence metaphors…
• Structure Genes
• Structure and function Genes „plus”
• Function Network
Complexity of representation
regulation, pleiotropy,epistasis, etc..
•Numbers shrinking (increasing): proportions change•Transparency disappears
Causality and explanation
• Event view– If A then B (… if not A not B…) etc
• Contributing causes– If A (and B and C) then B
• Multiple causation– If A (or B or C) then B
• Network causation– If (network ) then B
Network causation
• Not event like (c.f. gravitation, symmetry)
• Not individuated
• Handles (on trait development):– „Classical” (vary nodes: percolation of effects)– „Nonclassical”: network transformations
The organism as a network
10 9 15 24 3 23 4 55 64 23 12 54 67 89 25 39 19 51 43 4 32
•(dyamic) phenotpye vector, PIM and developmental network (map) behind•Representation problem (mixed nodes, mixed edges)•Proteins, properties, …
e.g. blue eye
A unified framework for..
• Gene expression
• Development
• Adaptation
• Learning and environmental induction
• Phenotype plasticity
• …
Genes: your outside is in
• Genes are „hidden” inside net topology
• For phenotype to phenotype interactions
• Most nodes are distant, „nontransparent”
• The whole network is the target of selection
• How does it permit/evokedifferent subnetworks
w/ different propertiesinteractor
replicator
Network transformations
• Growing network: stability, connectivity
• Strong links vs weak links
• Edge removal/addition w. phase transition (e.g. star/SF)
Connectivity/stability in ecosystems
• Translates as a diversity/stability problem in ecology• May-Wigner theorem (1971): low connectivity stabilizes• McCann (2000): high diversity/generalist species stabilize
• In cells: e.g. the role of chaperons• Hubs (not the genes ?!)• Topological „side” effects
NaNu in a new skin
• Old question: how much responsibility is exported from G to E (e.g. default envir.)
• New question: how much of the environment effects is internally controlled
• Network props not modifiable are few and far between
Summary
• Not, G, E, or GxE
• But rather x, where x = network topology
• A dominant and independent causal factor
Not considered in this talk
• Modularity (e.g. HOX genes, segments)
• Self organization (e.g. spatial perturbation)
• Hierarchical levels (Cells, Organs, etc.)
• Modes of inheritance and their roles
• … and many other issues