the science of spelling

12
The Science of Spelling The Explicit Specifics that Make Great Readers and Writers (and Spellers) J. Richard Gentry, 2004 Chapter Highlights (composed by Andrea Hnatiuk) Chapter 1 Discovery #1: There Is a Neurological Basis for Spelling (pages 1-12) Implications: Gentry identifies the implications of the neurological base for spelling that are summarized in 3 key points: 1 Put spelling on a pedestal. - Children learn to read by spelling and the alphabetic principle of reading can be taught through appropriate spelling instruction. - When we teach what beginning readers need to know – alphabet sounds, letter knowledge, concepts of what a word is, phonemic awareness an alphabetic principle, spelling patterns, mapping spoken language to its written form and phonics – we are teaching the underlying knowledge necessary for reading and writing. (p. 11) 2 Teach spelling explicitly. - What we know about how to teach spelling has changed.

Upload: andrea-hnatiuk

Post on 12-May-2015

2.467 views

Category:

Education


3 download

DESCRIPTION

This is a synopsis of Richard Gentry's book on spelling.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The science of spelling

The Science of Spelling

The Explicit Specifics that Make Great Readers and Writers (and Spellers)

J. Richard Gentry, 2004

Chapter Highlights (composed by Andrea Hnatiuk)

Chapter 1

Discovery #1: There Is a Neurological Basis for Spelling (pages 1-12)

Implications: Gentry identifies the implications of the neurological base for spelling that are summarized in 3 key points:

1 Put spelling on a pedestal.- Children learn to read by spelling and the alphabetic principle of reading can be taught

through appropriate spelling instruction.- When we teach what beginning readers need to know – alphabet sounds, letter

knowledge, concepts of what a word is, phonemic awareness an alphabetic principle, spelling patterns, mapping spoken language to its written form and phonics – we are teaching the underlying knowledge necessary for reading and writing. (p. 11)

2 Teach spelling explicitly.- What we know about how to teach spelling has changed.

3 Change your attitudes about teaching spelling and about spelling’s importance for literacy.- Challenge your current theories on the teaching spelling.

Page 2: The science of spelling

Chapter 2

Discovery #2: the Emergence of Spelling Ability and Ability to Spell Words Correctly and Automatically are Different (pages 13 – 23)

Implications for the emergent phase of spelling/reading/writing:

1. Children in Kindergarten and grade 1 should write frequently and invent spelling. Writing helps kids develop underlying knowledge sources for reading (sounds, letters, phonological awareness, phonemic awareness, and eventually phonetic patterns.

2. Four stages of spelling are in Kindergarten and Grade 1 are identifiable developmental levels. Use informal assessments (such as the Monster test) to track development.

3. Differentiate instruction during Phase 1based on levels of writing. Spelling instruction needs to be matched to the developmental phase of the child to assist them in moving to the next level as a writer. Differentiated instruction is also to the key to successful literacy teaching.

4. Early intervention should be provided to children in Phase 1who are not meeting expected levels of writing achievement. Strategic teaching is necessary to move students along. Monitor informally the automaticity of some spelling words. Personal writing journals are suggested that include “Words I Can Spell” from their own writing. Conduct informal spelling checks of high frequency words and patterns. Teach a core of first grade words and phonics patterns.

For those students in Phase II:

5. Provide explicit spelling instruction. Assess grade 2-8 spellers to determine if their word –specific knowledge meets expectations for their core of high frequency words. Teach word patterns students do not know.

For the detailed charts on research specific phases, please refer to the Phases document.

Page 3: The science of spelling

Chapter 3

Discovery #3: You Can Recognize Five Levels of Emergent Writing, Match your Teaching strategies to the Child’s Level, and Greatly Improve the Quality of your Literacy Instruction

Implications:

1. Gentry has identifies five levels of emergent writing (page 26 – 28). This scales helps to track students development and the changing alphabetic conceptualization. These benchmarks assist teachers to measure individual growth.

2. Use research based techniques to move students to the next level. a. Teach in the Zone of Proximal development As identified, there is a tie between the

child’s development and the best instruction for that level of development. (Vygotski, 1978).

b. Create a writing block – This block includes whole class mini-lessons, independent writing, and time for sharing. (Teaching block , 15 min., Writing block, 20-25 min., Sharing block, 5-10 min.) (Juel, 1994; Snow, Burns, and Griffin 1998).

c. Use of scaffolded writing - Scaffolding provides necessary supports for the learner to move to the next level (Bodrova and Leong, 1976, Vgotski, 1987).

d. Materialization – Use of tangible or material objects (hand spelling, letter boxes, finger spelling) (Bodrova and Leong , 1998; Galperin, 1969).

Page 4: The science of spelling

e. Adult Underwriting – The teacher models after the student has used few words of phrases to label a picture (3-5 words on a page), praising the child’s ‘kid’ writing and pointing out adult features in their writing. This is for low level writers, 0-2. (Feldgus and Cardonick, 1999).

f. Story Framing – i.e.: First, Then, Next, Last

3. Recognize when you are teaching writing at these levels, you are also teaching reading. Schedule plenty of time for writing.

4. Increasing the volume of writing will enhance your students growth in literacy.

Chapter 4

Discovery #4: You Need Good Quality Instructional Resources for Teaching Spelling – the Goodness and Evils of Spelling Books and Alternative Approaches (pages 40 – 54)

There are five guidelines for teaching word specific knowledge successfully:

1. Follow a curriculum.i. Curriculums provide continuity and consistency.

2. Use research based techniques.i. Teachers need to employ research based strategies and techniques.

3. Focus on the right words and patterns at the right time.i. The type and timing of spelling instruction is important.

4. Differentiate instruction.i. All children are not at the same place at the same time. Teachers must match

students to words and patterns and select appropriate methods and materials to meet the students’ needs.

5. Connect spelling and word study to reading and writing.i. Spelling needs ample time and opportunities to connect the development of

word specific knowledge to authentic reading and writing.

Gentry identifies seven methods for teaching spelling (2004, p. 44) :

Page 5: The science of spelling

1. Non-differential explicit word study anchored in word lists2. Differential, explicit instruction anchored in word lists3. Explicit study of common word patterns

Page 6: The science of spelling

4. Incidental learning of spelling by reading5. Focusing on writing and teaching spelling in use6. Fad programs7. “Teacher choice”

These seven methods are not equally effective – each has strengths and liabilities.

Strengths and Liabilities of Spelling Books(Gentry, 2004, pgs. 44 – 52)

Strength Liability Provide teachers with resources and

guides them with weekly words to study.

Systematically organized to make teaching spelling easy.

A good spelling book provides the right words at the right time, units of study across grades, a developmental sequence, resources for teaching important spelling patterns or principles, and exercises for consolidating spelling skills.

It might guide the teacher to use research based techniques and be partially helpful to teaches if they do not know how to teach spelling.

Well designed spelling books might help to differentiate instruction and provide strategies for connecting spelling and word study to reading and writing.

Cost Assumptions regarding that spelling

acquired from spelling books will transfer to more complex reading and writing tasks.

They are not teacher proof. “Dizziness” of variety over what

teachers have to choose from. Unevenness in the following:

comprehensiveness, research based, and scope.

Not necessarily individualized. Teachers may not be using research

based instruction. Just because publisher produce a

spelling program with your reading program, does not mean the spelling program is the best choice.

Spelling books do not tend to focus on word-specific knowledge, explicit teaching of words, explicit teaching of spelling patterns, connecting spelling to reading and writing.

Implications :

1. Research supports methods for teaching spelling explicitly.2. Teachers need alternate methods and quality instructional resources fro teaching spelling.3. Not all methods and material are equally effective.

Page 7: The science of spelling

Chapter 5

Discovery #5: There is One Best Way to Teach Spelling – Assess and Teach Each Individual – Hooray for Spelling Books! (pages 55 – 76)

Six research based techniques to use with weekly word lists:

1. Careful word selectioni. Match the right words with each child

2. Using a pre-test and post-test formati. Pre-tests are an effective way to individualize spelling.

ii. Word lists and test –study-test should be used only because the yare efficient and leave more time for other areas of literacy

3. Using a self correction techniquei. Research shows that students learn more from correcting their own

spelling work4. Teaching children how to study unknown words

i. Research by Horn (1954) and Allal (1997) identified a systematic technique for learning the correct spelling of words by using a combination of visual, auditory, kinaesthetic, and tactile procedures.

1. Pronounce each word carefully2. Look at each part of the word as you pronounce it3. Say the letters in sequence4. Attempt to recall how the word looks, then spell the word5. Check this attempt to recall6. Write the word7. Check this spelling attempt8. Repeat the above steps if necessary

5. Spelling games and board gamesi. Spelling games can supplement spelling instruction and is aligned with

cooperative learning theory.6. Word sorting

i. This is an instructional technique based on the systematic study of spelling patterns (based on research by Ed Henderson, 2000) and brain research

Gentry’s Instructional Framework for Teaching Spelling

Is a comprehensive framework for spelling instruction in Phase II (children learning new entries into their brains, new spelling patterns and strategies, new vocabulary word with familiar spelling patterns

Page 8: The science of spelling

It is explicit study of words in list form. It is explicit study of regular patterns Focused on effective strategies and teachers a few rules Connects content area to spelling Connects spelling to writing The framework is writing based and is individualized.

Spelling Framework’s Five Steps:

1 . Assessment

2. Ownership/Responsibility

3. Relevance

4. Teaching

5. Competency/Accountability/Accomplishment/Contextual Authenticity

Five Day Routine

The Day 1 Routine: Ten word pretest and self correction check

The Day 2 Routine: Making the individualist of ten words

Days 3 & 4 Routine: Word study days

The Day 5 Routine: The partner test

Page 9: The science of spelling

Chapter 7

Discovery #7: A Good Spelling Curriculum Makes It Easier to Know your Students

A good spelling curriculum is organized and consistent and will allow the learner to master the basic principle of spelling.

Good spelling instruction begins with knowing the learner and matching instruction to their needs.

Word sorting focuses student attention on the pattern structure of the English language.