the role of connectivity for sustainable regional development in …role+of+connectivity+for... ·...
TRANSCRIPT
1
UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE SAN LUIS POTOSÍ
FACULTADES DE CIENCIAS QUÍMICAS, INGENIERÍA Y MEDICINA
PROGRAMAS MULTIDISCIPLINARIOS DE POSGRADO EN CIENCIAS AMBIENTALES
AND
TH KÖLN - UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES
INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGY AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE TROPICS AND
SUBTROPICS
The role of connectivity for sustainable regional development
in the Highland Plateau Zone of San Luis Potosí
THESIS TO OBTAIN THE DEGREE OF
MAESTRÍA EN CIENCIAS AMBIENTALES
DEGREE AWARDED BY
UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE SAN LUIS POTOSÍ
AND
MASTER OF SCIENCE
“TECHNOLOGY AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE TROPICS AND SUBTROPICS
FOCUS AREA “ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT”
DEGREE AWARDED BY COLOGNE UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES
PRESENTS:
VIRIDIANA GALLEGOS TRUJILLO
CO-DIRECTOR OF THESIS PMPCA:
DR. ANUSCHKA VAN ’T HOOFT
CO-DIRECTOR OF THESIS ITT:
DR. JOHANNES HAMHABER
ASSESSOR:
DR. LOURDES MARCELA LÓPEZ MARES
COLOGNE, GERMANY AUGUST 2018
SAN LUIS POTOSÍ, MÉXICO OR COLOGNE, GERMANY DATE
2
UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE SAN LUIS POTOSÍ
FACULTADES DE CIENCIAS QUÍMICAS, INGENIERÍA Y MEDICINA
PROGRAMAS MULTIDISCIPLINARIOS DE POSGRADO EN CIENCIAS AMBIENTALES
AND
TH KÖLN - UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES
INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGY AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE TROPICS AND
SUBTROPICS
The role of connectivity for sustainable regional development
in the Highland Plateau Zone of San Luis Potosí
THESIS TO OBTAIN THE DEGREE OF
MAESTRÍA EN CIENCIAS AMBIENTALES
DEGREE AWARDED BY UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE SAN LUIS POTOSÍ
AND
MASTER OF SCIENCE
NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
DEGREE AWARDED BY TH KÖLN – UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES
PRESENTS:
VIRIDIANA GALLEGOS TRUJILLO
DR. ANUSCHKA VAN’T HOOFT
DR. JOHANNES HAMHABER
DR. LOURDES MARCELA LÓPEZ MARES
COLOGNE, GERMANY AUGUST 2018
SAN LUIS POTOSÍ, MÉXICO OR COLOGNE, GERMANY DATE
3
PROJECT EXECUTED IN:
TH KÖLN - UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES
INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGY AND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE TROPICS AND SUBTROPICS
WITH THE SUPPORT OF:
CONSEJO NACIONAL DE CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGÍA (CONACYT)
CENTERS FOR NATURAL RESOURCES AND DEVELOPMENT (CNRD)
LA MAESTRÍA EN CIENCIAS AMBIENTALES RECIBE APOYO A TRAVÉS DEL
PROGRAMA NACIONAL DE POSGRADOS (PNPC - CONACYT)
4
Erklärung / Declaración
NAME / NOMBRE: VIRIDIANA GALLEGOS TRUJILLO
MATRIKEL-NR. / N° DE MATRÍCULA: 11117383 (TH KÖLN), 174218 (UASLP)
Ich versichere wahrheitsgemäß, dass ich die vorliegende Masterarbeit selbstständig
verfasst und keine anderen als die von mir angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel benutzt
habe. Alle Stellen, die wörtlich oder sinngemäß aus veröffentlichten und nicht
veröffentlichten Schriften entnommen sind, sind als solche kenntlich gemacht.
Aseguro que yo redacté la presente tesis de maestría independientemente y no usé
referencias ni medios auxiliares a parte de los indicados. Todas las partes, que están
referidas a escritos o a textos publicados o no publicados son reconocidas como tales.
Die Arbeit ist in gleicher oder ähnlicher Form noch nicht als Prüfungsarbeit eingereicht
worden.
Hasta la fecha, un trabajo como éste o similar no ha sido entregado como trabajo de tesis.
KÖLN, DEN/EL ________________
UNTERSCHRIFT / FIRMA: ______________
Ich erkläre mich mit einer späteren Veröffentlichung meiner Masterarbeit sowohl
auszugsweise, als auch Gesamtwerk in der Institutsreihe oder zu Darstellungszwecken im
Rahmen der Öffentlichkeitsarbeit des Institutes einverstanden.
Estoy de acuerdo con una publicación posterior de mi tesis de maestría en forma completa
o parcial por las instituciones con la intención de exponerlos en el contexto del trabajo
investigación de las mismas.
UNTERSCHRIFT / FIRMA: __________________
5
For my parents and my brother, for their love and strength.
For Javier Trujillo, for reminding me every day that I am not alone.
For my family, for having faith in me.
6
CONTENT
Figures............................................................................................................. 9
Tables ............................................................................................................ 11
1 Introduction: The remote altiplano and ITS connectivity ...................... 14
1.1 Problem definition ............................................................................ 14
1.2 Objectives ......................................................................................... 16
1.2.1 General .................................................................................... 16
1.2.2 Specific .................................................................................... 16
1.3 Structure and content ....................................................................... 16
2 Conceptual framework: The role of connectivity for regional
development ................................................................................................. 18
2.1 Approaches to sustainable regions ................................................... 19
2.1.1 Current approaches and types of regions ................................ 19
2.1.2 Sustainability about a regional vision ....................................... 22
2.2 Concepts of connectivity and mobility and their relation .................. 23
2.2.1 Mobility within the connectivity network ................................ 23
2.3 Own approach: Regional connectivity and mobility and their
contribution to regional development ...................................................... 25
2.3.1 Connectivity with a regional approach ..................................... 25
2.3.2 Connectivity in sustainable regional development................... 26
2.3.3 Framework: indicator set for sustainable regional development
27
3 Methodology ......................................................................................... 28
3.1 Type of study .................................................................................... 28
7
3.2 Indicators for regional connectivity ................................................... 28
3.2.1 Mobility of goods, resources and people ................................. 28
3.3 The collection of data ....................................................................... 34
3.3.1 Collection of official statistics .................................................. 34
3.3.2 Field research .......................................................................... 35
3.3.3 Interviews ................................................................................ 37
3.4 Data analysis ..................................................................................... 38
4 Case Study: ‘Altiplano’ in San Luis Potosí ............................................... 40
4.1 San Luis Potosí as part of Mexico ...................................................... 40
4.2 The Altiplano region .......................................................................... 43
4.3 Review of state and national historical documents: the development
of the Altiplano ......................................................................................... 49
4.3.1 The region and its particularities.............................................. 50
5 Functional grid analysis of the regional sustainable connectivity .......... 56
5.1 Economic indicators .......................................................................... 56
5.2 Connectivity inside the Altiplano ...................................................... 61
5.2.1 Network structural changes ..................................................... 61
5.2.2 Services inside the region and its accessibility ......................... 64
5.3 Mobility ............................................................................................ 69
5.3.1 Regional transfer time ............................................................. 69
5.4 Functional grid analysis of the regional sustainable connectivity ...... 72
5.4.1 Basic education facilities .......................................................... 72
5.4.2 Health care facilities location ................................................... 86
5.4.3 Food trade location .................................................................. 92
8
6 Regional development of the Altiplano ................................................. 98
6.1 Political-administrative organization of the region ......................... 100
6.2 Regional development programs and activities .............................. 106
6.2.1 Economic development plans ................................................ 106
6.2.2 Social and regional development plans .................................. 110
6.2.3 Infrastructure development plans ......................................... 113
6.3 Consistency and contradictions in the development plans for the
Altiplano .................................................................................................. 114
7 Interpretation and assessment: The role of connectivity in sustainable
regional development ................................................................................. 117
8 Conclusion ........................................................................................... 119
8.1 Review of objectives ....................................................................... 119
8.2 Recommendations .......................................................................... 121
8.3 Further research demands .............................................................. 122
9 Appendix ............................................................................................. 123
10 References........................................................................................... 127
9
Figures
Figure 1.1 Issues addressed by a regional approach ...................................... 15
Figure 2.1 Sustainable regional connectivity and its implications .................. 18
Figure 3.1Main indicators for connectivity for sustainable regional
development ................................................................................................. 29
Figure 3.2 Trips traveled within the Altiplano region ..................................... 36
Figure 4.1 Macro regions in Mexico ............................................................... 41
Figure 4.2 Northern Highland Plateau in Mexico ........................................... 42
Figure 4.3 Catorce, San Luis Potosí ................................................................ 43
Figure 4.4 El Salado region ............................................................................ 44
Figure 4.5 Number of populations in the Altiplano region ............................. 45
Figure 4.6 Altiplano microregions .................................................................. 46
Figure 4.7 Altiplano population 2010 – 2015 ................................................. 48
Figure 4.8 Tourism in the municipality of Catorce .......................................... 54
Figure 4.9 Main square in Matehuala ........................................................... 54
Figure 5.1Workers insured according to their economic activity ................... 57
Figure 5.2Industrial zone in Matehuala ......................................................... 58
Figure 5.3 Municipalities that breed cattle .................................................... 59
Figure 5.4 Main Altiplano highways in 1978 .................................................. 61
Figure 5.5 Different projections through the years (Matehuala).................... 63
Figure 5.6 Infrastructure for accessibility to services within the Altiplano ..... 67
Figure 5.7 Accessibility to services in the Altiplano ........................................ 68
Figure 5.8 Dirt road to an ISSSTE health facility ............................................. 68
Figure 5.9 Road administration in the Altiplano ............................................ 71
Figure 5.10 Basic education facilities catchment area (3Km) ......................... 76
Figure 5.11 Basic education facilities catchment area (5-10Km) .................... 77
Figure 5.12 Miguel Hidalgo primary school in Matehuala ............................. 78
10
Figure 5.13 Basic education facilities in the Altiplano .................................... 79
Figure 5.14 Primary school facilities in the Altiplano (3Km) ........................... 80
Figure 5.15 Primary school facilities in the Altiplano (5-10Km) ...................... 81
Figure 5.16 Secondary school facilities in the Altiplano (3Km) ....................... 82
Figure 5.17 Secondary school facilities in the Altiplano (5-10Km) .................. 83
Figure 5.18 Secondary school in Guadalcázar ................................................ 85
Figure 5.19 Health Facilities location in the Altiplano .................................... 88
Figure 5.20 Medical rural unit in Guadalcázar, San Luis Potosí ...................... 89
Figure 5.21 Settlements without connectivity towards health care facilities . 90
Figure 5.22 Distance between settlements and health facilities .................... 91
Figure 5.23 Food supply facilities location ..................................................... 94
Figure 5.24 Street market in Catorce ............................................................. 95
Figure 5.25 Food supply facilities location ..................................................... 96
Figure 6.1Main highways in the Altiplano region .......................................... 99
Figure 6.2 Federal and state organizations directly influencing the mobility
and regional connectivity in San Luis Potosí ................................................ 100
Figure 6.3 Economic data by regions within San Luis Potosí - Percentage
compared to the income in “Centro” region ................................................ 107
Figure 6.4 Economic data by regions within San Luis Potosí ........................ 107
Figure 6.5 investments made during 2017 by SEDESORE ............................. 112
11
Tables
Table 2.1 Kinds of connectivity ...................................................................... 24
Table 5.1 Percentage of economically active population ............................... 56
Table 5.2 Purpose of cattle breed .................................................................. 59
Table 5.3 mining extraction in the Altiplano and its impact on the state ....... 60
Table 5.4 First need services within the Altiplano municipalities ................... 65
Table 5.5 Connection school location and attendance ................................... 73
Table 5.6 Accessibility to schools (Daily walking distances) ........................... 74
Table 5.7 Population per health facilities ....................................................... 86
Table 6.1 Needs by region according to the state government .................... 102
Table 6.2 Main topics developed in the state development plan of the state
.................................................................................................................... 103
Table 6.3 Laws that influence regional connectivity in the Altiplano región 104
Table 6.4 SEDECO concerted investment by region ...................................... 109
Table 6.5 Workers insured in the IMSS by region ......................................... 109
Table 6.6 Differences and similarities between state secretariats ............... 116
12
Abstract
The Highland Plateau region, in San Luis Potosí, involves particular dynamics
and needs from those presented within the rest of the state; its culture,
vocation, mineral resources and territory, converge to give rise to a unique and
particular region. The connectivity within the region has been decisive for its
development, since two of the largest and most important national roads in
go through this territory.
Despite comprehending about a half of the state's territory, this region has not
managed to truly influence the state statistics neither economically nor
socially; on the contrary, the employment rate has significantly decreased
significantly, and also its population number.
Accordingly, this research aims to analyze the connectivity system within this
region to strengthen and complement the development tools of these
communities in a sustainable manner and, in this way, increase the welfare of
the Highland Plateau population.
Throughout this investigation, it will be possible to understand how the
location of this physical network, as well as for the use of resources for the
satisfaction of the inhabitants, has been reflected in the communities within
this region. Likewise, the statements made by state directors in charge of the
economy, road network and social development within the region, will be
studied. These statements will also be combined with a “functional grid
analysis”, the connectivity between communities and their basic needs.
Keywords: Connectivity, regional development, sustainability, mobility,
accessibility.
13
Resumen
La región Altiplano, en San Luis Potosí, presenta actividades y necesidades
distintas a las de otras regiones dentro de este estado, debido a su cultura, su
vocación, sus recursos y territorio. Es por esto, que es necesario desarrollar
herramientas para su desarrollo regional, las cuales comprendan estas
particularidades. Así mismo, la conectividad dentro de la región ha
demostrado ser determinante para su desarrollo, pues corren a través de su
territorio, dos de las más grandes carreteras federales.
A pesar de comprender cerca de la mitad del territorio estatal, esta región no
ha logrado influir positivamente en las estadísticas sociales y económicas del
estado; por el contrario, la tasa de empleo ha disminuido significativamente
dentro del Altiplano, así como su número de habitantes.
Por tal motivo, la presente investigación pretende analizar la conectividad
dentro de la región para fortalecer y complementar las herramientas para el
desarrollo de estas comunidades de una manera sustentable y, de esta
manera, incrementar el bienestar de la población dentro del Altiplano
potosino.
A lo largo de esta investigación, será posible encontrar afirmaciones de
dirigentes estatales encargados de administrar la economía, la red carretera y
el desarrollo social de los habitantes de la región, así como un “análisis
funcional de la red” para la estructura física que conecta a cada comunidad
con los servicios básicos de educación, salud y alimentación.
Palabras clave: Conectividad, Desarrollo regional, sustentabilidad, movilidad,
accesibilidad.
14
1 Introduction:
The remote altiplano and ITS
connectivity
1.1 Problem definition
The balance between urban and rural entities in central Mexico, has been
drastically modified. Currently, the whole world is facing a population
concentration within the increasingly larger cities; according to the World Bank
of data, in fifty years (1966 - 2016) the percentage of urban population went
from 35 to almost 55% (The World Bank Group, 2018).
Sometimes, the interaction between communities inside a big system can
generate a complexity beyond what the communities themselves present
(Watts, 2006). This progressive migration of inhabitants to the urban
environment and, consequently, the imbalance within the regions, has shown
a growing complexity.
How the large infrastructure networks are vulnerable to random failures in
small points? In what way are individual behaviors associated to collective
behavior? Although it is simple to formulate, this is one of the most
fundamental and omnipresent questions of science in general (Watts, 2006).
What makes the system difficult to address is that, while the whole is made of
its parts, it is, instead, more than just its sum. More exactly, the pieces interact
with each other, and when they interact, even when it is all about relatively
simple components, they can have a disconcerting behavior.
The regional imbalance present in almost every Mexican territory, is a chain of
unbounded problems that require a multidisciplinary and regional approach to
be addressed.
15
There is a conceptual and methodological gap in the analysis of the way
mobility is handled in Mexico, and also in the relationship between mobility,
regional transportation systems and territorial planning (Martner, Balbuena,
Bustos, & De La Torre, 2008).
This problem leads us to implement an investigation to understand what has
led the Highland Plateau region (Altiplano) in the state of San Luis Potosí,
Mexico, to develop the currently imbalance among its entities, as well as its
administration strategies in order to identify the necessary actions to cover
some of its most basic and demandant needs and in this way, raise the
standard of living of the population and make their development conditions
also sustainable.
Within this research, the impact of connectivity and its structure, will be
proven to be a fundamental mean for equal accessibility and regional
development within the Altiplano; because, as will be seen later, the demand
of natural resources, has been one of the main problems this region’s
population is forced to face.
Figure 1.1 Issues addressed by a regional approach (Gallegos, 2017)
16
1.2 Objectives
General
To develop an analysis of the connectivity within the Highland Plateau region
of San Luis Potosí, Mexico for sustainable regional development.
Specific
To analyze the economic, physical and social indicators of the Highland Plateau
region through field research, interviews and official data.
To identify the connectivity effectiveness within the region through a
functional grid analysis
To develop an analysis for the current state of connectivity within the region
and the administrative strategies for sustainable regional development
1.3 Structure and content
After defining the problem and the general approach to the thesis, this
document is structured as follows:
The major terminologies and categories of analysis will be derived from
literature in chapter two, which concludes with a more detailed, theory-driven
conceptual framework. This is the base for the elaboration of the methodology
for this investigation, which will be detailed in the third chapter.
The Highland Plateau (Altiplano) of San Luis Potosí will be presented as a case
study in chapter 4, its regional history, as well as its public administration and
physical and social structure, based on national and state data, to later observe
its current status for the development in the economic, structural and social
sphere in chapter five.
17
Later on, in the chapter five, a functional grid analysis of the Altiplano region
will be developed, based on indicators for connectivity and sustainable
regional development such as economy, social welfare and infrastructure.
Within chapter six, the coordination of the instruments and the secretariats
that implement the administration of the Altiplano region will be evaluated,
through field visits and interviews, it will be possible to identify the areas in
which the state contributed the most.
The seventh chapter will connect the convergence of connectivity for
sustainable regional development with the actions and strategies that the
state secretariats have accomplished, to conclude with recommendations and
further research demands in chapter eight.
18
2 Conceptual framework:
The role of connectivity for regional
development
Connectivity with a regional approach, as will be seen next, has benefits that
include sustainable development and the leverage of resources. Therefore, we
will consider the conformation of a 'successful' region; for a regional approach,
certain conditions must be implicated.
Likewise, connectivity within a region has variables and approaches worth
mentioning for its study. The objectives of the strategic connectivity planning,
as well as its successful execution, are reflected in welfare for the population,
as will be observed in this chapter.
Figure 2.1 Sustainable regional connectivity and its implications (Gallegos, 2018).
19
2.1 Approaches to sustainable regions
Current approaches and types of regions
Geography is closely linked to the total life of a region and the constant human
struggle to make more rational the exploitation of natural resources, more
equitable distribution of wealth and to improve the location of productive
forces (Salguero, 2006). The distribution of resources and services within the
territory directly affects the entire population, which is why a multidisciplinary
vision is necessary for its planning.
The dynamism that takes place within each country, cannot always be covered
at the state level, because the politically imposed limits do not contain the
whole exchanges of resources or services, so a regional analysis is necessary.
With a regional approach the results are translated into more appropriate use
of the territory and its natural resources, the increase the productivity rates,
reducing imbalances by detonating disadvantaged areas and also improving
the quality of life of its inhabitants (SEDESORE, 2014), but what exactly is a
region?
The concept of ‘region’ contains a large number of meanings and its extension
is diverse. In what is widely agreed, is that the region as a general rule, means
any part of the territory that is smaller than the whole country, which has
specificities that make it a unit. (Celis, 1988). As an addition to this definition,
each region is made up of units of continuous territory.
Regional knowledge is a combination of methods, methodologies and
cartographic techniques that, in addition to complementing the observation
of social processes in the territory, takes advantage of the tools generated by
other sciences to obtain complete data on the transformations presented by
regions, beyond its political-administrative limits (Torres, 2006). Some of the
20
elements that are included to form functional regions are physical elements,
population practices, popular culture, economics, among many others.
As an "ideal" region, we understand the regionalization by which the following
aspects have been considered:
➢ Spatial conditions. The regions must be continuous geographical spaces
and must have an adequate internal connection.
➢ Economic conditions. The economic structure must be diversified and at
least it must contain an urban center potentially capable of serving as a
center of growth.
➢ Social conditions. Social conditions are associated with the connection
and social understanding of the population and / or their regional
commitment.
➢ Administrative conditions. Regionalization must coincide in some way
with the geographical limits of any of the possible divisions, at least in
the first instance (Celis, 1988).
From the point of view of a regional analysis, it is possible to identify three
types of regions, based on its conformation: the homogeneous, the
programmed and the nodal (also called heterogeneous) (Klapka, Halás, &
Tonev, 2013).
Homogeneous regions are usually identified based
on homogeneity criteria and they are based on state variables (e.g. if
population density is between 100–200 ppl per km2). Nodal or heterogeneous
regions are characterized by a common link of basic spatial units of various
sizes, they are linked by certain relationships which are happening at a
horizontal level. The third type, planning regions are defined for a specific
21
purpose based on the specific requirements of research (Mendel University in
Brno, 2010).
The German school was the first to study the interaction inside a region
between rural and urban entities; the internal structure of nodal region did
not, according to Klapka and Tonev (2008) emerge at one point but it
underwent a gradual development. Christaller1 identified the core and
periphery, Lösch2 divided an area into sectors where settlements or activities
were focused.
In his work, Von Thünen (1826) constructed a model of strategic planning to
explain the urban - rural differences and interactions, based on land prices and
transportation costs. His model was based on transport costs between one
center and another but also its quality (Moncayo, 2001).
The post-war decentralization policies have resulted in relatively equal
standards of living between regions as well as urban and rural areas, by both
international and European standards. The German case provides insight into
regional development pathways and instruments, balancing economic
requirements and social objectives (Dick, Inkoom, Teodoro , & Gaesing, 2016).
The German theories focus on the economic benefits that the strategies can
provide (Palacios, 1983). In order to further explain the spatial arrangements
and distribution of human settlements and their number based on population
and distance from another human settlement, one of the most appreciated
theories is the one created by Walter Christaller; which will be deepened later.
1 Born in southern Germany in 1893, is the creator of a land-use planning system called "'Die Zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland" as his PhD thesis, his ideas were implemented in Poland and southern Germany (Hottes, 1997). 2 German economist, born in 1906, wrote in 1940 his most famous work: “Die räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft” (Zottmann, 1949).
22
In the Mexican context, new tendencies of urban-regional concentration and
dispersion have emerged and, therefore, a high dynamism of medium-sized
cities (Martner, Balbuena, Bustos, & De La Torre, 2008).
Development in Mexico, as a complex phenomenon, is not presented in a
homogeneous way, on the contrary, it is reflected differentially between
spaces, showing imbalances, regional disparities and problems that need to be
studied to find suitable solutions (Álvarez, 2009). To understand the regional
inequalities, in this country, numerous works have been developed with a
regional approach (Velasco, Maldonado, & Torres, 2007). In spite of this,
Mexico still suffers from a lack of well-defined and coordinated regional
systems. The approaches have been limited to cover the national needs, which
have tended to increase concentration of industry and population in some
areas (Rodríguez-Oreggia, 2007).
Sustainability about a regional approach
The diagnosis of the economic, social and institutional conditions of every
territory and the identification of local economic potential are the foundations
upon which such development strategies are built (Pike, Rdz. Pose, &
Tomaney, 2006). A sustainable regional approach, lies in ensuring the
resources for the population; managing them efficiently and for future
projections to guarantee supplies.
In a territory characterized by imbalance, actions focused on regional
sustainable development, must be systematized in order to achieve greater
geographic reach, with better social reach and faster results, as a
consequence, the regional equality spur sustainable growth nationwide,
grounded in the potential of the region; this development, accordingly, should
be a responsibility of the government, but above all of the inhabitants of each
region, who are more familiar with its specific characteristics and problems (De
23
Carvalho & Fogliatti, 2016). Therefore, the articulation between not only local
but also regional needs and the agreement of the authorities, result in
sustainable strategies for the fair distribution of goods and in their use,
strengthening the region.
2.2 Concepts of connectivity, mobility and their relation
Mobility within the connectivity network
The expression 'connectivity' is increasingly frequent; appropriate for the
increasingly field of telecommunications and new information and
communication technologies (Santos y Ganges & De las Rivas, 2008). The term
is developed from the existence of links between objects and functions that
are interrelated, it is important the "good" connectivity for the country, as well
as for its regions, and to evaluate it, in this way new standards of improvement
can always be imposed (Figueroa & Rozas, 2005).
The term connectivity is still conceived as something imminently linked to the
internet or virtual networks3, on the contrary, it is necessary for this work the
physical vision of road networks within which the connections of services and
resources are possible.
Connectivity due to its ways of manifestation, diversifies into two main types:
digital and physical, as shown in the following table:
3 Connectivity: the ability of a computer, program, device, or system to connect to the internet, another computer, etc. (Cambridge dictionary, 2018).
24
Digital connectivity Physical connectivity
It is a system of networks connected
by communication links in order to
share data (Elahi & Elahi, 2006); the
character of the information era
owes its existence to technologies
such as computers,
telecommunications networks,
electronic media and the Internet.
The basis of this communication are
electronic devices, which provide the
energy to generate, manipulate,
manage and contain information
(Corey & Wilson, 2006).
Is the structure developed by a
network of corridors intertwining
different parts of a territory
(Figueroa & Rozas, 2005), within this
network of corridors, different
geographical points are connected
and as a result, mobility relationships
between people, resources and
services can be established (Santos y
Ganges & De las Rivas, 2008).
Table 2.1 Kinds of connectivity (Gallegos, 2018)
The planning of regional connectivity for a social, economic and natural
balance focuses precisely on this physical network of corridors through which
the mobility of resources flows every day. The main components that reflect
the effectiveness of this road network are the coverage required to support
the daily traffic generated by the needs of the inhabitants, as well as the
quality offered by this infrastructure to accomplish safer and more efficient
connections.
For the development of a region, it is essential to integrate the territory
through the transport network, since isolated entities develop economic and
social disadvantages compared to those that have exchanges of services and
resources with other entities (Figueroa & Rozas, 2005).
25
The term connectivity for territorial planning, refers to ideas of union,
interrelation and connection. The entities always pursue ideals such as the
growth of their economy, the complete coverage of productive areas, the
development of infrastructure and the increase of direct connections that each
urban area has with the rest, all these aims are based on a “successful
connectivity” (Santos y Ganges & De las Rivas, 2008).
For the quantification of connectivity, the satisfaction of the demands of the
population is measured in the shortest time and with the highest quality
possible (Iracheta, 2001). A successful connectivity also generates
development for the structural competitiveness4, which is centered on the
specialization of the economy, technological innovation, the quality of
distribution networks in the region and location factors, all of which constitute
the state of supply of goods and services (Hatzichronoglou, 1996).
2.3 Own approach: Regional connectivity and mobility and their
contribution to regional development
Connectivity with a regional approach
When the regional structure does not respond properly to the requirements
of space and efficient movement of people and goods, it is usual to develop
problems of congestion, saturation, immobility, among others (Jiménez-
Jiménez, de Hoyos-Martínez, & Álvarez-Vallejo, 2014).
Regional connectivity refers to continuous geographical spaces with an
adequate connection between the contained entities; the region needs to
4 The result of the successful management of the companies, but also takes into account the strength and efficiency of the national productive structure, the technical infrastructure and other factors that determine the externalities on which the companies rely (OECD, 1992).
26
contain an urban center capable of serving as a growth center. Likewise, the
connection and the social understanding of the population and their regional
loyalty are of vital importance for connectivity (Celis, 1988). The connectivity
with a regional scale seeks benefits which are deeply related, as mentioned by
several authors, with the population welfare its balance with its surroundings.
According to the aforementioned Lösch, the conception of “region” before his
proposals, were arbitrarily and accidentally determined, his intention,
therefore, was to propose a new concept that would overcome these
limitations and conceive a "more natural and lasting spatial order of elements"
(Palacios, 1983).
A theory that seeks to categorize and order regional connectivity, is the so-
called "Theory of the Central Place", proposed by the already mentioned
Walter Christaller and later complemented by Lösch.
According to the Theory of the Central Place; the entities within the country
are hierarchized according to their importance; the cities of first order are
determined by their prominent economic activities and functions they
perform, contributing significantly to the production and employment of the
country (Christaller, 1933).
Connectivity in sustainable regional development
Regional connectivity, as the basis of the interactions for the welfare of a
society, should also contribute to the innovation of more sustainable and less
polluting technologies.
Within the voluntary mobility of the population, two fundamental types have
traditionally been distinguished, long term/permanent and temporary, the
first being characterized by a modification of the place of residence and the
second by referring to short, repetitive or cyclic movements (Zelinsky, 1971).
27
The study of mobility has been affected by new phenomena, among which it
is possible to mention the increasing abundance of second homes, tourism,
seasonal agricultural work, return migration (both domestic and
international), or the occasional accommodation during the work week and
the later return to the family residence during the weekend. These
phenomena make mobility something entirely diverse (Casado, 2008).
Mobility is also a process that generates relationships (Korstanje, 2013).
According to this author, our future is increasingly unpredictable, since the
paradigm of mobility is constantly changing it. Faced with the issue of
ecological pollution, the actual society cannot be content with destroying his
system of mobility, however, seeks its modification and evolution to achieve
this evolution.
Framework: indicator set for sustainable regional development
Debates about this development have shifted from a focus on the quantity of
development to a concern with its quality; initially, this involved a focus on the
economic sphere, however, the natural environment, its use and preservation
has increasingly been more considered as a part of the objectives (Pike, Rdz.
Pose, & Tomaney, 2006).
For sustainable regional development, it is necessary to fully understand the
dynamics; therefore, within this investigation will be certainly analyzed, the
economic sphere, but also will take a look as well in the administrative
strategies and the different organizations in charge of this region, because, as
will be seen later, this sphere directly influences the development. Likewise,
the infrastructure through which the communities can connect with each
other and the facilities location and distribution to cover basic needs such as
health, education and food supply, will be evaluated.
28
3 Methodology
3.1 Type of study
This sustainable regional development research will have qualitative and also
quantitative data.
Due to the wide nature of the factors it is intended to work with, it is necessary
to collect social quality data of the Altiplano communities, but also the
connectivity infrastructure between communities for sustainable
development of the region will be reviewed, this data will be reflected in
quantitative figures.
3.2 Indicators for regional connectivity
Mobility of goods, resources and people
In general, the regional development is directly linked to the economic needs
of the population, however, to complement this development with a
sustainability approach, it is necessary to cover in like manner, for the social
welfare, the administrative system, its strategies and the infrastructure within
the territory; for this reason, the indicators will cover these three main aspects
of the region:
Each area, as will be seen below, implies specific indicators that can allow us
to understand the current situation and the development the Highland Plateau
region has presented up to the present time.
29
Figure 3.1 Main indicators for connectivity for sustainable regional development (Gallegos, 2018).
1. Economy and employment rates
The context for regional development, has been dramatically reshaped by
deep changes in the pattern of economic activity and has become significantly
more challenging (Pike, Rodríguez-Pose, & Tomaney, 2006). The economic
system has been globalized; and along with it, the constant economic flows
forcing to deal with different market systems. In this perspective, it is
reasonable to increase the already existent imbalance between entities
prepared to support this flow, and those the lack of inclusion to the
international system is leaving behind.
One of the main traditional aspects determining the regional development, is
of course the economic homogeneity (or in some cases disparity) and growth
of the region. The geographer August Lösch, in his work "The Economics of
Location" marks that a region corresponds to the idea of defining the territory
30
from the way productive activities are distributed over the territory, and
economic processes take place, considering the friction of distance.
In response to the theory Walter Christaller developed and its
complementation by August Lösch, it can be deduced that the economy in a
certain region is directly affected by the connectivity structure contained, as it
is indicated throughout their texts: a strategic network minimizes transport
costs and covers the supply demand of the population.
Within his theory of the central place (Systems zentraler Orte), Christaller
specifies that economic activities conduct and also distribute the population
surrounding them. Therefore, the hierarchy of a population center resides in
the economic efficiency it reaches, which in also depends on its area of
influence (Asuad, 2014). The mobility of economic resources presented inside
the Altiplano region will be addressed to identify flows and concentration
within the territory, which has a profound impact on communities.
Economic forces expose even the most remote spaces to competition and
firms, localities and regions to react and adjust to the new economic
conditions (Pike, Rdz. Pose, & Tomaney, 2006). As a result, it is necessary to
perceive the regional panorama in the economic sphere, since the settlements
are deeply affected by the advantages capital mobility, trade and transfers of
technology can provide.
Economic openness and the search for stability at the national level must begin
with an internal regional strength; an internal restructuring to face possible
competencies with other regions and the advantages they contain, to avoid
external pressures (Pike, Rodríguez-Pose, & Tomaney, 2006).
31
The polarization of economic resources, likewise, results in the development
of individual strategies by the communities (Morong R. & Sánchez E., 2006),
fragmenting social relations and their commitment to the region in general.
2. Public administration
The public administration of the territory is closely linked with the
development (Pike, Rodríguez-Pose, & Tomaney, 2006). The public
administration is responsible for developing and executing the plans that are
generated within the territory, they are also responsible for defining the space
and time in which the proposed objectives will be met, as well as for justifying
the management of public resources.
With an increasingly dominant and omnipresent capitalist economy, an
increased capacity from the administration to respond and adjust to these
challenges necessarily implies to create factors that will allow to place every
skills, products or services of each settlement in the regional, federal and
global network.
The state is in charge of driven but also safeguarding the interests and needs
of the individuals, as well as the natural resources which are also part of the
territory. For this reason, the organizations in charge of managing the Altiplano
region, the legislative instruments they have, as well as their current
operational system they present to implement these instruments, will be
considered.
According to the Mexican urban planner Alfonso Iracheta, in the Mexican
territory the geographical focus for regional projects has prevailed, so the
projects carried out have not adequately covered the regional needs. Likewise,
he declares federal agencies operate without truly knowing the regional
impact that is being produced because of these decisions (Iracheta, 2001).
32
In order to face the industrial network of global scale to which the state of San
Luis Potosí is currently being inserted, a regional policy is required to articulate
all the public organisms and to promote a more balanced growth.
The coordination of the municipalities through regional instruments generates
a perspective of openness among them and of "closeness" with the other
communities of the region, because as Lösch indicates, a political frontier is
also an economic boundary; by nature, it is hard to cross (Lösch, 1978).
Added to this regional perspective, is also found the importance of
coordination between projects of different public organizations; each public
organization must recognize the projects the other sectors are working with
and articulate their own interests with each other; to look for congruence.
3. Services distribution and physical network
The efficiency of connectivity between the nodes inside some territory, resides
precisely in the satisfaction of needs presented by the population; translated
physically into accessibility and speed indicators (Santos y Ganges & De las
Rivas, 2008). The particular character every region presents, are the flows
occurring inside the territory.
In addition to the economic field, the development of a region is also perceived
with the quality of the network distribution and the location of services; all of
this assure the supply of goods and services among the region
(Hatzichronoglou, 1996). To analyze the structure by which all these
interactions and movements are carried out and recognizing their elements,
drift us to know the very essence of the region.
33
In the classic analysis of transport networks (a transport system based on
branches and nodes) the choice of routes is always presented by identifying
their area centroids and their connectors (Santos y Ganges & De las Rivas,
2008). One of the general objectives of the regional approach, as mentioned
before, is to raise the general welfare level of the population, so accessibility
to basic services through strategic infrastructure coverage can be translated
into regional development.
Going back to the principles presented by Walter Christaller, the spatial
distribution must guarantee supply of basic services for the entire population.
The population demands are classified by their relevance and need of
proximity for communities; the immediate order services are basic education,
food supply and health centers.
In response to these precepts, the coverage of these three main services for
the communities will be evaluated through ArcMap; a processing program
used to analyze geospatial data. This tool is very useful to model
georeferenced transport networks and know the optimal routes for greater
accessibility to services. The coverage of services will be presented, first for
pedestrians, and later proceed to indicate the accessibility by motorized
transportation and the options the region has to offer as it is now.
This connectivity network will be presented divided by municipal, state and
federal order, for its better management, as well as its hierarchy and
directions.
These procedures will be applied in the Highland Plateau of San Luis Potosí,
which fulfill the requirements for the analysis to be viable, as will be seen
next.
in the next chapter, we will analyze the particularities that make the Altiplano
suitable to these considerations, since it is not yet a consolidated region; its
34
current stage of development still allows the adjustments and reinforcement
to the strategies to guarantee its sustainability.
3.3 The collection of data
Collection of official statistics
According to official reports from the state government of San Luis Potosí, the
state territory has “spatial and socio-economic imbalances in rural and urban
areas”5, so the main objective of gathering the regional data and develop the
analysis is to identify where the resources are concentrated and to present an
instrument to promote the development of this region.
Since 1983, in Mexico an autonomous agency
in charge of collecting and organizing all the national information on statistics
and geography was stablished; INEGI (National Institute of Statistics and
Geography) was created to homogenize the legislations and functions of
different organisms previously responsible for these tasks (INEGI, 2018).
The official national figures, this way, the national data are constantly being
updated and their results are also shared to collaborate with different
international organizations such as the Commission for Environmental
Cooperation (to produce the North American Environmental Atlas), the United
Nations (UN), the Organization for Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD), the Eurostat, among others.
From INEGI, official Mexican data will be collected, with the aim of knowing by
official means in what situation the Altiplano region currently is; INEGI is
currently the source with the most official data collection in the country.
5 Text from the Microregional Diagnosis of the Altiplano (SEDESORE, 2016).
35
The data collected will be related to the regional administration, the economic
incomes, the infrastructure coverage for accessibility to the communities, and
also data referring to the movement of these settlements within the region
towards their basic needs, such as education, health facilities and food
supplies.
It is intended a visit in the city of San Luis Potosí, where the state data of INEGI
is processed, to know the available data and the process by which these data
are collected and processed. The outcome of the current Altiplano region
panorama, will show the main reasons for the internal affluences and also in
which way the strategic connectivity is able to help covering some basic needs
of this region.
Field research
Visiting the state of San Luis Potosi, the aims are two extend visits to the
Altiplano region. The first trip will be focused on visit the northern part of this
region, the route will start from the city of San Luis Potosí,
going through the Federal Highway 57, towards Villa Hidalgo, Villa de Arista,
going back to de Highway to Guadalcázar, Matehuala, Cedral and ending the
journey in Catorce.
The second route for field research, will once again begin in the city of San Luis
Potosí, but this time turning west to Salinas through the Federal Highway 49
(to Zacatecas), then returning toward Charcas.
36
Figure 3.2 Trips traveled within the Altiplano region Own elaboration based on federal data (ITER INEGI, 2016).
37
The first route was selected to cross the federal highway 57, towards the
municipality with the greater concentration of population: Matehuala. Later
on, it is intended to continue in the direction of Catorce, which contains high
concentration of tourists; according to the State Tourism Secretariat, Catorce
has about 70,000 visitors every year (SECTUR, 2015).
The second objective of these journeys is to go through the western territory
of the region, starting with another main national artery, the called
"San Luis – Zacatecas highway". The municipality of Charcas is located right in
the center of the region and has a significant concentration of communities in
its surrounding territory, so it is the next aim.
During the expeditions, the purpose to cover and physically know a wide
extension of the territory of the Altiplano along these two trips, as well as to
know a little about the culture and structure of the main population centers.
Interviews
Within the city of San Luis Potosí, the main offices of every state secretariat
can be found; it is intended to get the principal ideas and thoughts of some
state dignitaries from the economic sphere (SEDECO), the social sphere
(SEDESORE) and the secretariat responsible for the physical communication
network of the state (SCT).
Through interviews, the generalities will be to inquire about the accessibility
by the secretariats towards the communities, as the flow and articulation of
information and objectives from one organism to another and the instruments
with which general decisions are made.
Each interview will be guided by stages; the regional perception, the current
regional projects and the future projections by these organizations.
38
The first part will be used to know the perspective the public regencies have
about these fifteen municipalities and the development as a region. The
second part of these interviews, will lead us to the current processes that are
being executed to develop and reinforce the connectivity for the communities.
Finally, the questions will focus on the projections that have and the validity of
the aforementioned projects, if their continuity is assured and the strategies
that will be followed.
As a basis for each interview, the questions will be slightly adapted to focus
better on each secretariat. Likewise, the interviewees will be shown a printed
map of the region (with the political division, the settlements and the road
network on them) to ease the physical territory explanations, as well as the
printed questions and topics to be discussed. Each interview will be recorded
with the permission of the interviewees to be used as a support for this
research (see appendix with questions).
3.4 Data analysis
As an addition to understand the vocation and identity of the region, historical
records with information about the Altiplano population and its dynamics with
the territory will also be analyzed.
It is wide known that the alterations caused by the Spanish colonies, generated
a massive loss of knowledge about the endemic indigenous settlements; in any
case, the culture remains, as well as the character of the inhabitants and the
customs, therefore small parts of the past help us to constitute what is
currently happening in the Highland Plateau region.
The documents reviewed are part of the “Historical file set of the state of San
Luis Potosí”, set of data provided by the same municipalities, because as will
39
be mentioned later, the northern region of the state of San Luis Potosí not
always was part of it and the official information of these municipalities were
added to this set later. These files will also be complemented with those
developed by the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI), which
annually updates the records.
40
4 Case Study: ‘Altiplano’
in San Luis Potosí
4.1 San Luis Potosí as part of Mexico
Mexico has 32 states and all together constitute a 1 964 375 km² territory.
According to the German Statistics portal “Statista”, Mexico is the 14th country
with the largest territory in the world (Statista, 2018) and as average, the
country has a population density of 61 inhabitants/km².
Nevertheless, San Luis Potosí as a state is below the national average with 45.
The Altiplano region, however, presents only 11 inhabitants per square
kilometer of territory according to official INEGI figures in the last record of
2015 (INEGI, 2018), a low dense territory, compared, for example, with the
more than 2,000 inhabitants per square kilometer presented by the city of
Cologne.
For better organization of those 32 Mexican states, the national government
has developed, based on physical and cultural factors, a division into macro
regions, which represents an effort to agglomerate the states with similarities
between them, in the following map, the division is represented.
41 Figure 4.1 Macro regions in Mexico Own elaboration based on the federal administration (Mexican Republic Government, 2018)
42
Likewise, within each state, interactions and dynamics of different nature
occur that cannot be perceived at a state level. These exchanges are clearly
presented inside the territory of San Luis Potosí; since the state is a cultural
and physical border between Mesoamerica and Aridoamerica6.
The "Northern Highland Plateau" belongs to Aridoamerica; a large region
distinguished by its dry-desert climate and mining vocation; the northern part
of the state includes clearly differences from the other regions of the state.
6 Aridoamerica is a territory of low humidity and a wide expanse of deserts, where most of its pre-Hispanic inhabitants were nomads. Mesoamerica has humid and warm climates where most vestiges of sedentary population have been found before the Spanish invasion (Mayans, Aztecs, Olmecs, etc) (Vela & Solanes, 2016).
Figure 4.2 Northern Highland Plateau in Mexico Own elaboration based on Bataillon (1993).
43
This big region has these particularities due to the fact that it is located
between two large mountain barriers, the Sierra Madre Oriental and the Sierra
Madre Occidental.
4.2 The Altiplano region
In this way, the northern part of the state of San Luis Potosí, is called ‘Altiplano’
(Highland Plateau). This part of the state, is the least favored due to the quality
of its soils, climate and scarcity of water (Bataillon, 1993). The region contains
15 municipalities and 342,903 inhabitants (INEGI, 2010).
According to national data,
with 28,454 km², the
Altiplano region covers the
45.54% of the of the state
territory and Matehuala,
the biggest urban entity7
produces about 7% of the
state's gross domestic
product (GDP). Matehuala
where, according to the
State Economic
Development Secretariat,
the economic activity of the region is concentrated (SEDECO, 2016). This
Secretariat (SEDECO), counts on the industrial zone of Matehuala to be
expanded by 2021 and as a result, to generate greater incomes and develop
the Altiplano economy.
7 A population in Mexico (INEGI) is considered rural, when it has less than 2,500 inhabitants, while an urban entity is where 2,500 inhabitants or more live in it.
Figure 4.3 Catorce, San Luis Potosí (Moon, 2017)
44
The Altiplano is also part of a larger region called 'El Salado', which consists of
an extensive region with natural salt deposits, which once a year provide large
amounts of salt that are collected and sold. This region also includes territory
of other states, such as Aguascalientes, Zacatecas, Durango, Coahuila, Nuevo
León and Tamaulipas.
The first complex for the exploitation of salt, settled by Spanish workers in the
lagoon 'Santa Maria', in the municipality of 'Salinas de Hidalgo'.
The San Luis Potosí Altiplano consists of fifteen municipalities, and as can be
seen below, the population concentration in the east of this region, is
remarkable; 63% of the total population growth between 2000 and 2015
Figure 4.4 El Salado region Own elaboration based on data from the Autonomous University of Nuevo León (UANL, 2018).
45
(32,762 people), was presented in this Matehuala. As second and third place,
also in this last fifteen years period, the municipalities of Salinas and Cedral
presented an increase of over three thousand people each. On the other hand,
six of the fifteen municipalities suffered from population decrease: Catorce,
Charcas, Moctezuma, Santo Domingo, Villa de Guadalupe and Villa Hidalgo. As
can be seen in the following map, population imbalance throughout the
territory is evident.
As a method to delimit information, the Altiplano was subdivided into three
'micro-regions'. According to the Secretary of Social and Regional
Figure 4.5 Number of populations in the Altiplano region Own elaboration based on INEGI data (ITER INEGI, 2016)
46
Development of the State (SEDESORE), this micro-regionalization is reflected
in best integrity, coherence and cohesion of public action; based on the
dynamics recognition and the real conditions of its population, communities
and municipalities. According to this Secretary, one of these regional
subdivision main achievements, is the system of state and federal roads; being
determinant for commercialization of products and efficient movement of
physical and human resources (SEDESORE, 2016).
The Altiplano population is settled mostly along the region defined as East
Altiplano and, according to state reports, in 2016, the West Altiplano
microregion contained the lowest population density of all the state
microregions.
As mentioned before, the
population density of the
Altiplano is 11 inhabitants
per km², however, looking
only into the western
microregion, this figure
drops to 8 inhabitants per
km².
In Mexico, population
censuses are officially
generated every ten years,
and every five years,
“counts” are generated in order to observe population growth rates and to
know the direction the country is taking. According to these censuses and
counts (the last count was taken in 2015), the population of six of the fifteen
East Altiplano
West Altiplano
Middle Altiplano
Figure 4.6 Altiplano microregions Own elaboration based on State Government data (San Luis Potosí State Government , 2015).
47
municipalities of this region presented a population decrease, expanding the
population polarization within the Altiplano.
48
9,705
19,176
20,839
26,340
99,015
19,539
31,794
12,210
7,629
14,486
15,258
9,671
5,227
37,184
14,830
9,716
18,485
21,138
25,985
91,522
19,327
30,190
12,043
7,902
14,492
15,528
9,779
5,350
37,928
14,876
9,889
16,153
21,070
25,359
78,187
19,904
26,405
12,755
7,533
14,205
13,747
10,378
5,135
34,432
14,989
Catorce
Cedral
Caharcas
Guadalcázar
Matehuala
Moctezuma
Salinas
Santo Domingo
Vanegas
Venado
Villa de Arista
Villa de Guadalupe
Villa de la Paz
Villa de Ramos
Villa Hidalgo
Altiplano population 2000 - 2010 - 2015
Figure 4.7 Altiplano population 2010 – 2015 Own elaboration based on data from the Economic Development Secretariat (SEDECO, 2017)
49
The graph, indicates the variations that have been presented in terms of the
official number of the population every five years. The gray bars represent
changes between 0.5 percent (+, -) of the population. With green color is
indicated the increase of the population; in darker green, are the population
that increased more than 2% in that five years. With red, on the contrary, the
population that decreased is indicated, with a darker color also, changes of
more than 2% are indicated.
In total, the Altiplano region represents a population growth from 2010 to
2015 of 10.5%.
4.3 Review of state and national historical documents: the
development of the Altiplano
Throughout time, countless studies have been made on the effects that its
history has on the population, formed through written, oral or iconic
narratives, which are reflected in their individual and collective identity
(László, 2014). Nowadays, there is a frequent decrease in identity referents
generated by the constant migratory movements and the increasing ease
globalization represents for mobility, therefore the representations of history
are vital to shape the regional identity.
The collective memory and the historical materials are the foundation of this
identity, since its interpretation tries to create common feelings and develop
emotions of the individuals who are part of that identity. The inclusion of a
historical approach to examine the identity of a certain population
complements any investigation since it is based on popular behavior (Verdu,
2014).
50
As a principle of justice for the current reality, measures must be used to
reconstruct and learn as accurately as possible the regional historiography, in
order to interpret better the territory and the activities that are carried out
within it (Morong R. & Sánchez E., 2006).
When someone sets out to study a topic within the colonial period in San Luis
Potosí, it is easy to see that in the documentary level and the pursuit for
sources, researchers face limitations and often discourage, when they
perceive the dispersion of this information, as well as the inexistence of proper
research instruments adjusted to the conditions of historical work in the entity
(Montoya, 2013). As is known, the Spanish colonies developed cultural
impositions that even today result in a difficult search of history and attempts
to recover local indigenous customs.
The truth is that knowing the past of the Altiplano region is a challenge due to
the lack of information presented. Then, however, it is presented from the
most reliable sources, what is known about the historical development to the
present day.
The region and its particularities
According to the State Historical File of San Luis Potosí, the population that
inhabited the region before the Spanish conquest, were indigenous nomads,
called Guachichiles, an ethnic group that lived in what is known as the “Big
Chichimeca”, extension of territory named by Charles Di Peso (an American
archaeologist) in 1979.
The studies referring to the Chichimec groups, include all a shared aspect: the
persistent conceptualization of these cultures in relation to the pre-Hispanic
cultures of central Mexico; the archaeological studies are directed towards the
ethnic groups like generic characters without face, traditions or culture,
51
subject to the political dispositions of that time and presenting resistance by
its same wild condition and nothing else (Zapata R., 2013).
Since 1550, took fifty years for the Spanish regime to submit the Chichimeca
population. Due to their protective and nomadic nature, they faced the
bloodiest conquest undertaken by the regime of New Spain (Powell P. , 1996).
This conflict occurred because the interest of the Spanish people in the mining
exploitation; issue that altered the borders that were in force in prehispanic
time.
Subsequently, separate settlements were created for the indigenous people
and Spanish population (Powell, 1945). The reports made for the Spanish
crown with the profits for silver mining, are the first official data giving us the
reference to the mining and commercial vocation of the region (Montoya,
2013).
About municipal internal information, some post-colonial local data can be
found along the State Historical File. The municipality of Charcas is one of the
most important settlement during the colonial period of what now conforms
the state of San Luis Potosí; this municipality though, was within the
jurisdiction of the “New Galicia” and was not part of the civil and ecclesiastical
demarcations of the capital city (San Luis Potosí).
As for Matehuala, some authors indicate the contradictions of its founding
year, as its existence begins to be reported only through reports on debts, sale
of mines, the Franciscan doctrine (catholic), reports of “Haciendas” and some
Spanish and indigenous settlements. About Catorce, it is indicated that in the
last period of the XVIII century, the date of the foundation of the mining town
is situated.
52
The oldest information about Cedral's settlement dates back to the year 1726,
although there is an idea of its foundation that is more attached to the work
of the Franciscan missionaries to reduce the nomad population in 1795. The
beginnings and consolidation of Cedral cannot be separated from the
importance of Real de Catorce, around which, the town served as an
articulation between the mining center and Matehuala (Montoya, 2013).
The Historical File of Salinas, includes documents from 1713 in relation to the
production of salt. Also, in the neighboring state of Zacatecas, documents
about Villa de Ramos, Matehuala and Charcas can be found, due the previous
different regional borders.
The municipality of Moctezuma has its origins in the effort to settle the
nomads of northern Mexico in the mid-sixteenth century; on the contrary
Guadalcázar, due to its important mining centers, was founded in 1616 as an
exclusively Spanish settlement of mining entrepreneurs.
The commercial trade was consolidated as the main economic activity of the
Altiplano region in the 18th century, once mining lost its strength as an
economic boost.
More recently, in the 1980s, INEGI produced a document indicating all the
particularities by state within Mexican territory. Within this report, it is already
pointed out the important concentration presented in the capital of the state
and how, "the most favored economic region of the state, besides the city of
San Luis Potosí, is the Huasteca" due the oil extraction that takes place in some
municipalities of the state (Ébano and Tamuín).
Within the Altiplano, on the other hand, the exploitation of gold, silver, zinc
and fluorite mines is still being reported in Charcas and Catorce. From the
records of that decade (1980), the extraction of minerals progressively
53
decreased giving way to the tourist attraction for its own mining identity and
indigenous traditions. Matehuala and its surroundings, was also indicated as a
rich area for agriculture.
54
Figure 4.8 Tourism in the municipality of Catorce (Moon, 2017).
Figure 4.9 Main square in Matehuala (Gallegos, 2018).
55
As can be observed, maintaining and rescuing the identity of the region is vital
for its development, since the customs that the population presents are still
belonging to a culture of survival and adaptation due to the relative lack of
resources and the external pressures they have been exposed to.
It is understandable, that this region has a strong disparity among the other
San Luis Potosí territories, since it has generally been identified over the years
as a region with more affinity towards the northern territory of the country,
while the center of the state is more identified with the center of the republic.
These differences are disadvantages for the region; the state standards do not
cover the particularities of the Altiplano as a mining, tourist region and with a
developed toughness towards the presented adversities.
After making a review of the trajectory the Altiplano region has followed to
become what it currently is, we will see in the next chapter, how the region at
the present time is in terms of economy, the physical structure within the
territory and its population dynamics.
56
5 Functional grid analysis of the
regional sustainable connectivity
5.1 Economic indicators
According the last detailed report made by the state government (2017), the
Altiplano region produced around the 6.4% of the state GDP; of the 2,814,616
population within the state of San Luis Potosí (2017), 12.7% is located within
the Altiplano and around 47% of the state population is economically active8.
Within this region, the rate of workers per municipality is as follows:
Percentage of economically active population
Municipality 2010 2015 Contrast
1. Catorce 47.07 40.89 -6.18 2. Cedral 47.66 44.11 -3.55
3. Charcas 46.54 44.54 -2.00 4. Guadalcázar 44.9 28.39 -16.51
5. Matehuala 52.06 50.99 -1.07 6. Moctezuma 44.37 31.59 -12.78
7. Salinas 45.32 35.26 -10.06
8. Santo Domingo 38.57 26.27 -12.30 9. Vanegas 45.73 39.18 -6.55
10. Venado 45.64 37.34 -8.30 11. Villa de Guadalupe 43.3 32.11 -11.19
12. Villa de la Paz 47.92 44.8 -3.12 13. Villa de Ramos 41.63 21.34 -20.29
14. Villa Hidalgo 43.76 36.14 -7.62
15. Villa de Arista 47.91 36.57 -11.34
Table 5.1 Percentage of economically active population (SEDECO, 2017).
8 Population participating in the generation of some economic benefits.
57
As can be seen, the percentage of the economically active population in the
Altiplano has decreased in the last decade from 1.07% in Matehuala, to even
a 20.29% in Villa de Ramos (SEDECO, 2017). The Altiplano population,
produces therefore 79,878 MXN as GDP per capita (around €5,916).
In the employment field, within the entire state, the highest percentage of
employment is to the industrial area, as shown below:
Figure 5.1Workers insured according to their economic activity Own elaboration based on data from the state government of San Luis Potosí (SEDECO, 2017)
As can be seen, the industry is the area in which most people from the entire
state of San Luis Potosí are employed, however, within the Altiplano region,
the scenario is quite different.
38.6%
8.4%1.1%5.1%0.6%
14.6%
4.8%
13.9%
13%
Employment in the state of San Luis Potosí (2017)
Industry
Construction
Mining
Agriculture
Electricity
Commerce
Transportation
Outsourcing services
Social services
58
According to state government reports, is the main economic exchange center
of the region is Matehuala (SEDECO, 2009). This city also is the main
communication way between the city of San Luis Potosí and the north of the
country.
Despite the different constitution of the Altiplano region for employment,
within the state administration that took place in the years 2003 - 2009, the
state governor created a legislative order authorizing to create the industrial
zone of Matehuala, with a total area of 652,539.28 square meters.
Figure 5.2Industrial zone in Matehuala (Gallegos, 2018)
However, despite these impositions made by the state, the Altiplano continues
to be a livestock, mining, agricultural region, and also in the last decade has
also shown aptitudes for tourism. In livestock, the Altiplano municipalities
breed cattle of free grazing. According to national statistics, 40% of this
livestock is at least three old and the main profit from this breed can be seen
below.
59
Reason for breeding Percentage
Breeding of calves to sell 35%
Fattening cattle to sell 25%
Sale of milk products 2%
Table 5.2 Purpose of cattle breed Own elaboration based on federal data (INEGI & SLP GOB, 2016)
The main municipalities that are dedicated to
cattle breathing are Vanegas, Cedral, Matehuala,
Charcas, Venado, Villa de Ramos and Salinas.
In the field of agriculture, within the region,
continuous and seasonal mechanized agriculture
can be found (Appendix D). The production in this
region is green chili, red tomato, alfalfa, corn,
beans, soybeans, wheat, sorghum, safflower,
barley and peanut.
As mentioned before, the municipal capitals of the region were mostly
established in those territories due to mining, so it is a deeply rooted activity
in society even today, it is part of its daily life and traditions (Detailed mining
location in Appendix C). During 2015, the following extractions were reported:
Mineral Municipality Tons extracted Percentage of extraction within the state (Of that
mineral)
COPPER Charcas 3 216 11%
Villa de la Paz 26 825 89%
GOLD Villa de la Paz 1 085 24%
SILVER Charcas 38 257 22%
Villa de la Paz 90 618 51%
Figure 5.3 Municipalities that breed cattle
60
LEAD Charcas 1 346 100%
PLASTER Guadalcázar 119 395 21%
ZINC Charcas 28 728 100%
Table 5.3 mining extraction in the Altiplano and its impact on the state (INEGI & SLP GOB, 2016).
Tourism has also been gaining strength in the last years, especially in the
municipality of Catorce, due to its cultural, historical richness, the possible
tours through old mines and the landscapes it offers, from the annually
registered tourists, around 85% are Mexican.
Another important productivity sphere within the region is commerce. Villa
Hidalgo, is the main honey producer of the state; during 2015, it was produced
more than 204 tons. Likewise, the municipality of Venado is the only one in the
state producing high quality wood from the so-called "Mezquite" tree,
(Prosopis laevigata). Meanwhile, Charcas, Guadalcázar, Vanegas, Villa de
Guadalupe and Villa Hidalgo, produce vegetal fibers to knit; within these five
municipalities, was registered the production of 126 tons, 96% of the annual
production.
As can be seen, the productivity of the Altiplano region is vital for San Luis
Potosí, it is also highly diverse, complementing the activities made in the other
regions of the state. It is also remarkable, that the region has high aptitudes to
adapt to the scarcity of water and the dry desert climate it presents.
Due to the very particular nature of the region, it is necessary to preserve its
practices and traditions, helping them on their own terms to develop, since
the imposition of standards and the exploitation of the territory to address
external interests, will certainly induce unfortunate consequences for this
region.
61
5.2 Connectivity inside the Altiplano
Network structural changes
One of the first official records of infrastructure that San Luis Potosí has,
indicates that the state, until December 1978, presented road network with
total of 6336km, distributed into: 2 068 km paved, 3 290 km covered with
concrete and 978 km of just soil. This network is equivalent to 10.04 km of road
per 100 km² of territory (INEGI, 1985).
Within the maps made for this report, it is indicated that two highways go
through the Altiplano: the federal highway 57 (from north to south) and the
also federal highway 49, towards Zacatecas. As a secondary route, the
Figure 5.4 Main Altiplano highways in 1978 Own elaboration based on the Geographic synthesis of the state of San Luis Potosi, (INEGI, 1985)
62
importance of a "state road" connecting Moctezuma, Venado and Charcas is
also remarked.
In around the last 20 years, the official information about the roads are made
through mapping INEGI generates. The procedure of this mapping is to take
GPS points and to separate all information by layers for its better
management, the results presented by this institute are becoming each year
more specific.
Because of the constant updating of tools and methods to generate these
maps, a constant barrier to make proper comparisons of the physical
development of the region, are the different data and information found in
each report.
Initially, the results were presented by maps in PDF format, then they were
published with a DWG extension and currently, the presented data is can be
found in GIS format; the current maps are noticeably with a better quality;
however, it is not possible to accurately know about the specific changes
suffered by the road network in the Altiplano due to the different projections
and scales each present.
In the following map, the different data produced by INEGI from 2000 to 2015
for the geographical study are shown.
63 Figure 5.5 Different projections through the years (Matehuala)
Own elaboration based on federal data (INEGI, 2018).
64
The results are presented in different geographical projections, so they are not
entirely compatible and do not match. Every five years, as shown, the
information produced has been increasingly specific and accurate. The data
currently presented for the highways and roads, contain directions and speed
limits among their attributes, as well as their proper names and the scale at
which they are being managed.
As it is also appreciated, the rural communities are now present in the maps,
although without the precise information that can be found in the state and
federal roads; it is expected that in the updated maps of 2020 include this new
data.
It is noticeable, the wide efforts that have been made to complement the
information for bigger results every five years and also to reform the data
collection to achieve this objective, however, due to the diverse information
and the dispersion found of the data, it is not possible to generate a proper
observation of the real growth of the regional road network within the
Altiplano is San Luis Potosí.
Services inside the region and its accessibility
'Accessibility' and 'connectivity' have inevitably interrelated purposes, (Santos
y Ganges & De las Rivas, 2008). The regional connectivity infrastructure guides
growth directly; it confers this way access to the communities and the facilities
within them.
The Altiplano region has basic services for its population daily life (health,
education and food supplies), however, the importance of accessibility for the
population to these health facilities, basic education and food supply, has been
scarcely discussed so far by the specialists in connectivity and the authorities.
65
The entity that contains the lowest number of services (69) for its population
is Villa de la Paz, however, its municipal seat presents conurbation with
Matehuala, what could mean in this way the coverage of services.
Naturally, Matehuala has the largest number of facilities (537) for basic
services, followed by the region’s south east municipality Guadalcázar, with
464.
It is understandable when these results indicate that the facilities do not
completely cover the territory, since the Altiplano represents a low population
density and the territory is quite extensive, however, when the data related to
the population number is observed, the region present not enough
infrastructure for basic needs.
On average, for every 63 people, there is a basic service within the Altiplano;
if we see it in perspective, to provide a population in a given territory with a
Table 5.4 First need services within the Altiplano municipalities Own elaboration based on federal data (ITER INEGI, 2016)
66
food facility, a basic school and a hospital, these would need to supply a total
of 189 people.
Later, to continue with these considerations, the territorial coverage of these
facilities and its catchment area divided by categories, will be analyzed to have
a detailed breakdown of the population needs in this region.
The map presented next, shows the location of these facilities registered by
the end of 2017.
67 Figure 5.6 Infrastructure for accessibility to services within the Altiplano
Own elaboration based on official federal data, (INEGI, 2018)
68
Certainly, the greatest number of services can be found in the entities with
more population, such as Matehuala, Salinas, Charcas and Venado. It can be
seen, however, that information gaps exist on the communication routes that
physically connect these facilities and the population.
This undocumented infrastructure
are commonly dirt roads through
which some communities are
connected; the inhabitants of these
settlements within the Altiplano
have to go these routes mostly
walking or by horse. In this way,
some services within the region
present difficulties for access to the
population not only with disabilities
or older people, but in general.
Figure 5.8 Dirt road to an ISSSTE9 health facility (Gallegos, 2018).
9 Institute of Security and Social Services of State Workers (Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado)
Figure 5.7 Accessibility to services in the Altiplano Own elaboration based on official federal data,
(INEGI, 2018)
69
Taking as a basis that accessibility is proximity or distance, the relationship
with transportation system that allows to bridge the distance, the effort
needed in time and cost, and the relationship with the activity in which the
individual takes part (travel reasons) (Santos y Ganges & De las Rivas, 2008),
communities far from the main federal communication channels are deprived
of these services.
5.3 Mobility
Mobility depends on several issues, including access opportunities to goods
and services, provided by the context the population lives in. When these
needs cannot be fully covered, the probability of families presenting the need
of migration increases, and as a consequence, profound changes in social
composition are generated (Molinatti, Rojas-Cabrera, & Peláez, 2014). This
way, the territory is abruptly modified and imbalances may appear if there are
not enough planning tools to avoid it.
In the case of Latin America, cities have a deep social inequality, due to the
concentration of resources in only some sectors (Molinatti, Rojas-Cabrera, &
Peláez, 2014).
Regional transfer time
Within the Altiplano region, different types of road administration are
conceived: municipal, state and federal. Of federal order, is the highway 57,
crossing the Altiplano from Villa Hidalgo to the north, in Matehuala. With less
extension but also federal, is the highway 63, which crosses the region through
the center, from Moctezuma to Villa de Guadalupe. Likewise, a small part of
the highway 49 also goes through this region, which only crosses the
municipality of Salinas.
70
From state administration, there are roads complementing the coverage of the
major federal arteries. With smaller sections are the roads in the municipal
level, which are mostly congregated for internal mobility. According to the
Road Regulation and Federal Jurisdiction Highway Regulations, the speed limit
for federal highways is 100km/h and in urban areas it is reduced to 50 (SCT,
2012). Inside the state, the speed limits are expressed less clearly; the state
roads, on average have a limit of 80Km/h, and for the municipalities, it
oscillates between 60 and 40Km/h.
The state road coverage of infrastructure for mobility is the widest with
937,898 kilometers of paved roads of two and four lanes. While the federal
highways cover 584,616 kilometers; these are also completely covered with
pavement and of two or four lanes.
The municipal roads, however, have 5,251 kilometers (officially registered) so
far and this information is different inside the database; these are one or two
ways roads and there is no record of the material which they are made of.
The infrastructure is concentrated along the municipalities of Matehuala,
Charcas, Venado, Moctezuma and Salinas, the imbalance suffered within the
region in terms of infrastructure due the highway 57 is remarkable.
Within the following map, it is possible to observe the different roads that
cross the territory of the Altiplano.
71
Figure 5.9 Road administration in the Altiplano Own elaboration based on federal data (INEGI, 2018).
72
5.4 Functional grid analysis of the regional sustainable connectivity
Within this following section, we will analyze the relationship within the
Altiplano region presented between the physical network for mobility, and the
existent facilities offered to cover the basic needs of the population; the
information processed has been provided by INEGI and updated this year; it is
intended, to make an analysis as accurate as possible.
As previously remarked, the services within this particular region, are grouped
along the highways 49 and 57. Likewise, the intention would not be to bring
services covering parts of the territory that do not require it (without settled
population), therefore, by calculating the distance between these facilities
towards the population, will be observed if there are cases when communities
without these services are found.
Basic education facilities
In some countries such as Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada or the United
States, every year more organizations develop initiatives for students to
choose better to walk to educational facilities instead of motorized
transportation; according to some organizations, it is healthier, safer and
cheaper (Kindsein, 2013). But what happens when some communities have
challenges due to the inaccessibility to these facilities and the students must
walk longer distances than recommended?
As a natural situation, underserved communities need particular attention.
Transportation, planning and designing professionals, school communities,
law enforcement officers, community groups and families, all have roles to
meet the community’s educational needs. To assure facilities for education in
every community, data collection is critical to the planning, implementation
and evaluation of programs (Safe Routes, 2018).
73
In a project initiated in Mali in 2006, with the support of the "Education
Development Center" (a global association based in the United States), the
attendance of elementary school children was compared by radios of distance
between the community and the closest schools. The assistance was evaluated
between communities that had schools within, those that had to travel up to
two kilometers to reach them and those that were two to three kilometers
away from the next school.
According to this report: “The data showed that school attendance declined
dramatically when children were asked to leave their own community to
attend school in another. In fact, for those villages without schools and
situated less than two kilometers from a village with a school, school
attendance was roughly half that observed in the villages with schools. For
those villages without schools and located between two and three kilometers
from a village with a school, school attendance was between one quarter and
one third of that observed in villages with schools” (EDC, 2013).
Community - school distance Percentage of kids not attending
school due the distance
School located in the community 0%
Less than 2 Km 48%
2 – 3 Km 69%
3 – 4 Km 79%
4 – 5 Km 87%
Table 5.5 Connection school location and attendance Own elaboration based on EDC data (EDC, 2013).
Understanding the thresholds above which young people are less likely to walk
to school may inform local and national governments in making policy
decisions regarding supporting active commuting to school (Chillón, Panter,
74
Corder, Jones, & Van Sluijs, 2015). It has been accepted that in primary
education the children should be able to get to school in not more than 45
minutes. This transfer time corresponds to a maximum of about three kms on
foot on level ground, of course less in mountainous areas, some 15 kms on a
bicycle and about 30 kms in a car or a bus (Caillods, 1983).
As a result of a research made by UNESCO, the objective of creating ranges of
physical distance between students and the facilities, is to identify different
categories of situations from the point of view of accessibility. To understand
this situation, the following table is presented:
Accessibility categories ‘Students - Educational Facilities’
Less than 1 km - Easy journey
From 1 to 3 kms - Reasonable journey
From 3 to 6 kms - Difficult journey
Over 6 kms - Unacceptable journey
Table 5.6 Accessibility to schools (Daily walking distances) Own elaboration based on data from Caillods, 1983
As a method to observe the accessibility offered by the connectivity network
within the Altiplano region for basic education, information was mapped for
each municipality first without making any distinction between primary and
secondary schools. This is education is considered the basic education and it’s
a constitutional right for all Mexicans.
In 2013, the so-called "Educational Reform" was approved by the Mexican
federal government, which indicates that it is necessary for the basic education
schools, to share with the federal agencies the details of their facilities,
teachers and students. The reason for this openness of information is to
"reduce the administrative burden on teachers and the administrations and
75
also to achieve a fluid communication" (Mexican Republic Gobernment, 2013),
as a result, INEGI has been able to detail more accurately the data of these
schools of basic education in the country.
In the 2015 national census, the complementary data about the educational
level each school offer and the capacity of the students they manage, are
reflected on the statistics; however, due to the urgency of this reform
application, the complete data could not be entirely collected at the time. In
the Altiplano region, these specific data are not yet found in the municipalities
of Cedral, Santo Domingo, Vanegas and Villa de Guadalupe.
Within the following map, it is possible to observe the coverage the region has,
in terms of basic education. By 2010, INEGI registered almost 64,000 children
between 6 and 15 years old living this region, this age is the average to study
primary and secondary school. For each basic education facility, the region has
265 children.
The lack of coverage by these educational facilities towards the population is
evident, since the number of deprived communities is high. In this way, the
effort to cover distances to get basic education lays on the communities
themselves; it is possible to observe that if the radios of non-motorized
displacement are extended to five and ten kilometers beyond an
“Unacceptable journey”, according to UNESCO.
76
Figure 5.10 Basic education facilities catchment area (3Km) Own elaboration based on federal data (ITER INEGI, 2016).
77
Figure 5.11 Basic education facilities catchment area (5-10Km) Own elaboration based on federal data (ITER INEGI, 2016).
78
As mentioned before, it is possible to differentiate already in most
municipalities between facilities for primary or secondary education; however,
there are still not enough information in some municipalities due to the lack
of data in some municipalities, it is possible, still, to observe the patterns
followed in the coverage of each type of basic education can be observed.
Each facility has been processed according
the distance of transfer; the results will
show us the routes through the Altiplano
road network that exactly cover 30km
away from those schools. As can be seen
in this figure, it is possible to identify from
the central point (in this case the “Miguel
Hidalgo” primary school in Matehuala) to
each possible direction, 30km. In this way,
communities that neither walking nor by
road can easily access a basic school
facility will be detected.
In the next pages, three maps are
presented. Within the first, it is possible to observe the municipalities where it
is separated primary education from secondary school, also, the municipalities
when it is only indicated as "basic education".
In the second map, to know distances traveled within the physical network of
the Altiplano to reach basic education, is indicated how much travel is required
to be able to access a primary school within this region. These results are
shown together with radios of five and ten kilometers away to access these
facilities in a pedestrian way, in addition to the 30Km road distance. Finally,
the same results for secondary schools are presented.
Figure 5.12 Miguel Hidalgo primary school in Matehuala Own elaboration based on federal data (INEGI, 2018)
79
Figure 5.13 Basic education facilities in the Altiplano Own elaboration based on federal data (INEGI, 2018).
80
Figure 5.14 Primary school facilities in the Altiplano (3Km) Own elaboration based on federal data (INEGI, 2018).
81
Figure 5.15 Primary school facilities in the Altiplano (5-10Km) Own elaboration based on federal data (INEGI, 2018).
82
Figure 5.16 Secondary school facilities in the Altiplano (3Km) Own elaboration based on federal data (INEGI, 2018).
83
Figure 5.17 Secondary school facilities in the Altiplano (5-10Km) Own elaboration based on federal data (INEGI, 2018).
84
In the first map presented, can be seen that the facilities that have not been
defined as primary or secondary schools, are the municipalities of Santo
Domingo, Vanegas and Cedral.
These main axes of federal communication, definitely generate an impact on
the regional structure of the infrastructure for education distribution,
however, due to the need of education, this kind of facilities appear, although
with less density, within territory without apparent access routes.
It is also remarkable, the apparently usual location of schools for children from
6 to 15 years old, right on the roadsides of these highways, due the high
connectivity this represents between these facilities and the population. It is
necessary to rethink the access by different means so this does not represent
a sacrifice of the population welfare for the right to basic education.
Another aspect reflected within the distribution of educational facilities
through this territory, is that municipal division does not represent any kind of
change in the distribution pattern, the decisions to settle the educational
facilities, are evidently related to the road structure of the region, without
presenting imbalances by municipal administrations.
It is evident the disparity the Altiplano comprehends between the number of
primary and secondary schools for the population. The number of these
facilities found, decreases drastically from primary to secondary; of the first
ones, among the municipalities that specify the kind of basic education, is
possible to find 911. However, the same graduated population that requires
that number of primaries to be satisfied, only have 17 secondary schools.
85
From the almost 64,000 children between 6 and 15 years old living this region,
43,000 are between 6 and 12 years old, age to study primary school,
meanwhile, the other 21,000, are between 12 and 15 years old; secondary
school age.
It is true that the current secondary school demand is lower than primary
education, however, secondary is also constitutionally a right for every kid, so
it is necessary to consider, that once finished primary school, these 43,000
students will need facilities to study further.
According to a study conducted in rural communities by the Education
Development Center of the United States, when the geographic area from
which children are eligible to attend a particular school gets bigger, the
attendance is directly related.
Within this study, it was shown that the variability of children attending the
school affected the percentage of students; because “enrollment of children
living two to three kilometers from the school, dropped considerably in
comparison to those living closer to the school” (EDC, 2013).
Figure 5.18 Secondary school in Guadalcázar (Gallegos, 2018).
86
Health care facilities location
In Mexico, every healthcare facility needs to be certified and these facilities
respond to an established federal government program; the specifications
depend directly of the Presidency of the Republic. As compared to the
experience worldwide, we see the Mexican medical services lagging behind in
such regard. The lack of interest in understanding the culture of medical
facilities, is based on the principles and values provided in the organization
manual of each public and private medical institution, there are also other
specific factors that negatively influence the health services for a population,
like the number of these facilities and their location (Herranz, 2015).
Within the Altiplano, there are registered 308 health facilities:
Municipality Population Health Facilities Population/HF
Matehuala 99,015 45 2,200 Villa de Ramos 37,184 26 1,430
Salinas 31,794 18 1,766 Guadalcázar 26,340 28 941
Charcas 20,839 25 834 Moctezuma 19,539 22 888
Cedral 19,176 22 872 Villa de Arista 15,258 15 1,017 Villa Hidalgo 14,830 15 989
Venado 14,486 20 724 Santo Domingo 12,210 18 678
Catorce 9,705 14 693 Villa de Guadalupe 9,671 20 484
Vanegas 7,629 9 848 Villa de la Paz 5,227 11 475
Table 5.7 Population per health facilities Own elaboration based on federal data (ITER INEGI, 2016)
87
Certainly, the facilities of each health center have a different capacity number,
however, regardless of the population number in each municipality, the
number of inhabitants the facilities must supply with medical services, is very
variable.
Despite being the municipality with the largest number of health centers,
Matehuala has fewer facilities per inhabitant and yet (regardless of the quality
of the facilities), countries such as Germany, Austria, Hungary, the Czech
Republic and Poland have between 6 and 8 health facilities per 1,000
inhabitants, so by deduction, the number of facilities among the communities
is not insufficient (OECD, 2016).
According to the latest OECD report in 2017, Mexico was below the average in
terms of health care accessibility, since within the entire country, only 92
percent of the population has some kind of health insurance (mostly public
assurance), below the 97% which is the average among all OECD countries.
Within this OECD analysis, it is also remarked, that for the population within
the country, public expenditures for the facilities, the necessary instruments
and the health service are far below what is necessary; only a quarter of what
is recommended, which directly affects the life expectancy (OECD, 2018).
Within this context, the evaluation for accessibility for these services is
necessary. In the following map, the territorial distribution of these facilities
can be seen, along with the location of the population settlements.
88
Figure 5.19 Health Facilities location in the Altiplano Own elaboration based on federal data (INEGI, 2018).
89
Although there is no specific tool that indicates the influence radius of the
health centers within the Social Development Secretariat in Mexico, the
distances of 5 and 10 km were taken; these distances represent, on average,
one and two hours walking for an average person, respectively. Within these
buffers made around the health facilities, it was found that 98 population
settlements require a longer distance than 10 km in order to access medical
services.
The areas with most scarcity of facilities for health, are again those that are far
from the national highways, in municipalities such as Santo Domingo, Vanegas
and Catorce.
The health centers were projected in a database to recognize the communities
located more than 30 km away by motorized means, as well as 5 and 10 km
for pedestrians. The network of roads, indicates, with a full coverage of red
Figure 5.20 Medical rural unit in Guadalcázar, San Luis Potosí (Gallegos, 2018).
90
color, that once this road network is
reached, there are not a section of this
road network where no health facility is
found farther than 30 km.
However, there are many facilities of
this type that do not have access to this
road network and the even more
alarming results of these projections,
are the 93 localities that were found
without access to health care facilities;
They are not within the radius of 10 km
of proximity to these facilities, nor do
they have easy access to the road
network.
Figure 5.21 Settlements without connectivity towards health care facilities
91
Figure 5.22 Distance between settlements and health facilities Own elaboration based on federal data (INEGI, 2018)
92
Within this region, it is possible to observe the biggest health facilities gaps in
the municipalities of Vanegas, Santo Domingo, the eastern part of Salinas and
Catorce.
Food trade location
According to statistics from the state government, Charcas is the municipality
with more communities presenting social gaps within the Altiplano region. This
social gap is measured by access to health and education, the services each
housing provide and food accessibility (SEDESOL, 2018); food supply facilities
within each entity, are considered as “essential services” for the country.
As a response to some countries´ lack of accessibility towards food supplies in
order to guarantee the vulnerable population welfare, the Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, addresses the concept of
“Food security”, which refers to stability, availability, utilization and
accessibility for acquiring appropriate foods for a nutritious diet (FAO, 2006).
In Mexico, every six years since 2006, a National Health and Nutrition Survey
(ENSANUT) has been made, to identify the conditions under which Mexicans
eat, the usual difficulties presented to obtain food and the relationship
between their diet and their health.
In the latest results developed in 2012, it was indicated that San Luis Potosí
was the fifth state with more food insecurity for its municipalities. This
meaning, about 8 out of 10 households in the state, faced some kind of
adversity in order to feed themselves properly. 10.8% of the households,
likewise, presented “severe insecurity”, which means they suffered hunger on
at least one occasion in the three months prior to the survey. In the rural
population this increase, since 14.3% of the inhabitants suffer from
93
malnutrition and low weight, compared to the 8% presented in urban entities
(ESANUT, 2013).
To know the location of the facilities within the entire Mexican territory, INEGI,
in its database, has information about these proper facilities for the food
obtainment, which are denominated according to their scale and construction,
as a Central of Supplies (Central de abastos), Market or Shopping Center
(Centro comercial) according to INEGI. Presented in the following map, the
distribution of these facilities throughout the region are presented.
Likewise, in addition to addressing the food supply needs for the population,
there is also the opportunity to strength the local products quality and
distribution, because as mentioned before, livestock and agriculture are some
widely practiced activities within the region (see appendix D for more details
about the agriculture location).
94
Figure 5.23 Food supply facilities location Own elaboration based on federal data (INEGI, 2018).
95
The map shows that the location of these facilities tends to be once again,
along these main roads and, as a contrast to what was observed in education
and health, the number of these facilities and their distribution present
different patterns within the different municipalities.
Vanegas, as an example, contains an only center in the main road cross it has,
while on the contrary, Santo Domingo, presents a more equitable distribution
of these facilities.
These facilities do not follow any strategical order to guarantee the supply of
these services for the population, but apparently, they obey the demand is
produced by the flow of people on the highways.
Through the network analyst tool, a study was made to observe the efficiency
of the region in supplying food to the communities. As can be seen in the
following map, municipalities such as Vanegas and Guadalcázar do not have
direct access to these facilities, which means these communities are tied to
consume almost exclusively what is produced in their own community,
without ease for the exchange or purchase of different products.
Figure 5.24 Street market in Catorce (Moon, 2017).
96
Figure 5.25 Food supply facilities location Own elaboration based on federal data (INEGI, 2018).
97
The communities outside these catchment areas can be, surprisingly, found in
each of the municipalities. The accessibility to this basic service is considered
as an indicator of the social welfare of the entities, however, a concrete
pattern to cover these needs of the population cannot be seen.
On the other hand, in addition to the lack of facilities and strategic distribution,
the road network shows inefficiencies to connect these centers, by
maintaining distances of more than 30 km away from facilities for food
supplies, it is proven to be inefficient to cover these popular daily needs.
98
6 Regional development
in the Altiplano
One of the main issues faced in every region is related to the difficulties of
social actors in the search, organization, access, modeling, and interpretation
of socio-economic data, especially in complex environments, generating needs
that, although continued and urgent, often fail to take proper responses from
policies and practices of public administration (De Carvalho & Fogliatti, 2016).
The State-community relationship is strengthened when both sides are able to
articulate their interests and explore different methodological possibilities of
studies for the benefit of each one (Morong R. & Sánchez E., 2006), although
this open communication is not as simple as it seems, because the strategies
chosen for it are not always the most appropriate; each society responds
differently and each one certainly is sensitive to different kinds of stimuli and
to the diverse actions proposed by the authorities.
At the end of the last century, when globalization began to spread in a
generalized manner, it was accompanied by the idea of ungovernability, as a
result of growing evidence of the inability of governments to respond to the
multiple social demands that arose from the intercommunication tightness
now on a global scale (Meyenberg, 2012). The current cities, face a lack of
territorial order and homogeneity of service coverage for the entire
population, the contrasts between the demands and responses obtained are
increasingly evident.
One of the new challenges the government of San Luis Potosí faces, is precisely
the global trade negotiation for new industries that decided to locate within
its territory. According to national reports (INEGI, 2008), by the beginning of
2018 the state was in the third national position with the highest economic
99
growth related to the manufacturing industries. More than half of this
manufacturing production comes from foreign companies such as BMW,
Bosch, GM, ABB, Dräxelmeier, Cummins, etc.
Since the beginning of the 21st century, a growing number of industrial
companies have been concentrated within the state along the ‘National
Highway 57’ (one of the main national arteries that goes from Mexico City to
the border with the United States) which It is observed next
Figure 6.1Main highways in the Altiplano region Own elaboration based on federal data (INEGI, 2018).
100
These large employment locations have resulted in a population choosing to
concentrate their households in the highway closest entities, developing an
imbalance that local, state and municipal governments have had to face, since
internal migration is evident. The internal organization to legislate and try to
cover these growing and demanding popular needs for the connectivity and
mobility within the Altiplano region, are presented in this section.
6.1 Political-administrative organization of the region
The globalizing scenario proposes challenges in the administrative political
sphere, cultural dynamics, the functions of the State and the relationship
between the society itself (Morong R. & Sánchez E., 2006). To understand the
dynamics taking place within the Altiplano of San Luis Potosí, the
administrative context for decisions and the implementation of strategic
programs is presented next.
Figure 6.2 Federal and state organizations directly influencing the mobility and regional connectivity in San Luis Potosí Own elaboration based on data from ‘San Luis Potosí state government 2015 – 2021’, 2018.
101
Mexico has 18 ‘State Secretariats’, federal agencies in charge of coordinating
projects and needs of the Mexican population. Within these 'State
Secretariats', as will be seen below, are the 'Secretariat of Social Development'
(SEDESOL), the 'Secretariat of Agrarian, Territorial and Urban Development'
(SEDATU), the 'Secretariat of Economy' (SE) and the 'Secretariat of
Communications and Transportation' (SCT), which directly influence the field
of physical connectivity and mobility for the development of the entire
Mexican territory.
All these federal agencies, also have support of the state organizations in order
to achieve the national objectives. These 'State Secretariats' have also their
own objectives, which are the result of the mediation between both local and
national needs. Every six years10 the governor of the state, the leaders of the
secretariats and certain directors of the state change, and with them also
changes the way the management manuals and the strategies are presented
and executed by the government.
The current government of the state of San Luis Potosí, as every last
administration has done, has developed the "State development plan 2015 -
2021"; an operational instrument where every development plan has been
prepared based on proposals, projects and actions gathered during a citizen
consultation process, in order to know firsthand, the population demands. The
priorities indicated, according to this document are:
10 The current San Luis Potosí government is 2015 - 2021.
102
Table 6.1 Needs by region according to the state government Own elaboration based on data from San Luis Potosi Government, 2015.
As a result of this citizen survey to know the priorities of the citizenship, five
main axes were created on which the current "state development plan" is
centered.
Improvement needs Altiplano Centro Media Huasteca
Fight against poverty x x x x
More and better jobs x x x x
Water and hydrological reserves x x x x
Tourism, commercial and service development x x
Agricultural development x x
Public security x x x x
Urban infrastructure and mobility x
Education, culture and sport x x
Health and nutrition x x
San Luis Potosí regions
103
Table 6.2 Main topics developed in the state development plan of the state Own elaboration based on data from San Luis Potosi Government, 2015.
104
The state in response, is focused on developing and adhering to these main
objectives during at least these six years. The state agencies, work under
federal regulations in union with the local, one of the most important law for
the state of San Luis Potosi, is the 'Organic Law of Administration of San Luis
Potosí', in charge of regulate every task and scope each department must
have.
The state laws in San Luis Potosí, are proposed and reformed by a chamber of
27 local Deputies11. Currently, there are seven key laws directly influencing the
administration and decision making for the regional connectivity in the
Altiplano:
Name Last modification
Traffic Law of the State of San Luis Potosi
May 3rd 2018
Law for the Promotion of Sustainable Rural Development of the State of San
Luis Potosi April 12th 2018
Urban Development Law of the State of San Luis Potosi
February 20th 2018
Law for Sustainable Economic Development and Competitiveness
April 27th 2017
Organic Law of the Public Administration of the State of San Luis
Potosí April 11th 2017
Law of Social Development for the State and Municipalities of San Luis
Potosi September 17th 2016
Law of Planning of the State and Municipalities of San Luis Potosi
May 7th 2016
Table 6.3 Laws that influence regional connectivity in the Altiplano region Own elaboration based on (LXI Legislatura SLP, 2018)
11 The 27 deputies rule only for three years, the LXI staff of state Deputies will be replaced in 2018 through popular elections.
105
According to state regulations, the regional or sectoral programs will be
developed only by state or municipal administrations, and all the programs
must be consistent with each other and serve as a basis for the final integration
of each annual budgets (San Luis Potosí State Government , 2015). This
indicates that regional planning may have long-term goals, however, it is
necessary to create reports to request economic support every year, in order
to be included in the annual government reports.
In this way, in order to obtain the necessary financial resources for
implementation, the State Secretariat of Finance is always in charge in the first
instance to approve or reject every proposal, regardless of the organization
that will execute it. This is also pertinent for the plans that have a regional
focus; the projects proposed and/or approved by the municipal councils, must
be passed directly to the state department of finance.
For the study, planning and dispatching of the businesses of the state public
administration, the state government has seventeen dependencies:
1. General secretary of government 2. Secretariat of Finance 3. Secretariat of Social and Regional Development 4. Secretariat of Urban Development, Housing and Public Works 5. Secretariat of Communications and Transportation 6. Secretariat of Economic Development 7. Ministry of Agricultural Development and Hydraulic Resources 8. Secretariat of Ecology and Environmental Management 9. Secretariat of Education 10. Ministry of Labor and Social Security 11. Secretariat of Tourism 12. Secretariat of Culture 13. Administrative Office 14. General Procuracy of Justice 15. General Contralory of the State 16. Secretariat of Health 17. Secretariat of Public Safety
106
Within these public organizations, three stand out in the field of connectivity
and regional mobility, the Secretariat of Social and Regional Development
(SEDESORE), the Secretariat of Communications and Transportation (SCT) and
clearly the Secretariat of Economic Development (SEDECO). Three main areas
will be taken as a basis for the study of the Altiplano region: the economy, the
society and its structural network.
The economic dimensions such as growth and jobs, have historically been at
the forefront of describing what constitutes local and regional development.
Some authors, however, have incorporated to these definitions of local and
regional development, the reduction of social inequality, the promotion of
environmental sustainability, an inclusive government and governance and
with also the recognition of cultural diversity the population may have (Pike,
Rodríguez-Pose, & Tomaney, 2006).
6.2 Regional development programs and activities
Economic development plans
To address the needs and provide solutions in the economic sphere of the
state of San Luis Potosi, is the Secretariat of Economic Development; a state
organization focused on promoting new investments (by national or
international companies) to generate more jobs sources (SEDECO, 2018).
The last state economic report that was officially obtained from the
secretariat, is with indicators of the end of 2017. According to this latest
report, the Altiplano contributed 6.4% of the state's gross domestic product,
as shown below.
107
As can be seen, the gross domestic product from each region is compared,
reflecting the centrality of resources in the central region; the state capital. the
territory, however, covers almost half of the state, and despite the low
population density, GDP per capita remains low. Within the reports made
annually by this secretariat, the municipal or state figures are found, it is not
common to find detailed regional reports though.
Due the importance of regional focus for state plans development and to deal
with this globalized growth within the Altiplano region, the “Regional Council
for the Sustainable Economic Development and Competitiveness of the
Altiplano Zone” was created, which is in charge of implementing the already
mentioned “Law for Sustainable Economic Development and
Competitiveness” specifically for this region. This Regional Council, is focused
on attracting more investing companies to be installed in this region.
Figure 6.4 Economic data by regions within San Luis Potosí (SEDECO, 2018)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Population GDP GDP per cápita*
Centro Altiplano Media Huasteca
*Percentage compared to the income in “Centro” region
108
As director of economic planning and competitiveness of the state, is José
Antonio Montes Ávila, bachelor of economics and master of administration of
quality systems by the “Universidad del Valle de México”. Due the importance
of his decisions and the effect of this secretariat actions, an interview to this
regent was pertinent. The interview included three main sets for a better
organization of the topics.
In response to asking about his conception about the current state of the
Altiplano, he pointed out that the region has indeed high aptitudes to develop
economically. "The vocation of this area is traditionally mining and
commercial, however here, 2.0% of the gross value of manufacturing
production is generated," he said.
According to this secretariat figures (INEGI, 2014), the three main sources of
employment in the region are trade (employs 5,474 people, 16.3% of the
regional population), the manufacture of transport equipment (employs
2,516, 7.5% of the total of population) and mining (1,713 people employed,
5.1% of the regional population).
As a complement to the mentioned importance of the region for the state, he
indicated that the municipalities of Salinas, Charcas and Matehuala are the
ones that contribute the most to the state's GDP.
Within state graphs obtained through the state government, it is pointed out
that on the second year of this government (2016), investments for mining in
the region increased, so the Altiplano was the second region that received the
most investments; of 100 per cent of investments, results for each region are
indicated:
109
Altiplano 6.67%
Center 93.28%
Middle 0.02%
Huasteca 0.03%
Table 6.4 SEDECO concerted investment, by region (Montes, 2018).
Likewise, when questioned about the decrease in the employment rate
presented within the region, he agreed that the figures by INEGI show those
results, however, he expressed that the IMSS (Mexican Institute of Social
Security) results presented by the IMSS, indicate "a gradual recovery of jobs".
Table 6.5 Workers insured in the IMSS by region (Montes, 2018)
Likewise, when asked about the necessary measures for the development of
the Altiplano, he explained that the “Matehuala - Cedral - Villa de la Paz” route,
will be an industrial corridor due to its strategic location, which will represent
economic development for the region.
For future projections, the director pointed out that the GDP of the region and
also per capita has increased, so a future in which more jobs are generated
and economic development increases, is viable.
110
Social and regional development plans
To meet the needs in the social field of the state and coordinate their
programs, is the already mentioned SEDESORE (Secretariat of Social and
Regional Development).
This secretariat, has as general objective "to work for the social welfare and
the equality of opportunities for all potosinos" (potosino refers to the gentile
of the people from the state of San Luis Potosí) (SEDESORE, 2018).
The Director of State Government Planning, the engineer Brenda Meléndez
Vega gave an interview for this investigation, for an opinion with focus on
social development.
As with the previous interview, the questions were divided into three sections:
the present, the necessary measures for its further development and the
projections that comprise this region.
The Altiplano region, has several economic supports from the federal
government; the "Strengthening Fund" and the "Municipal Social
Infrastructure Fund" are distributed depending on the number of inhabitants
residing in each municipality, according to the latest census and are granted if
the municipalities have high or very high levels of social gap. These funds are
intended to promote development and equality among the population
(Meléndez, 2018).
The interviewee, pointed out that several Altiplano municipalities, such as Villa
de la Paz and Charcas, receive the "Mining Fund", which encourages the
sustainability of mineral extraction and invests in better technologies and
training, which directly seeks a “sustainable social development”.
During the interview it was indicated that with these funds, the use of 15% of
the total amount can be invested on physical connectivity. The problem lies in
111
the fact that road infrastructure does not directly affect the social gap level, so
for the federal government it is not considered a priority. In this secretariat,
we understand the advantages for the population induced by the accessibility
to these communities, however she expressed that their main job is to improve
the indicators that directly affect our guidelines, such as drainage, public
lighting and electricity.
For SEDESORE, however, there is an indicator called social cohesion,
developed by a national council, the National Council for the Evaluation of
Social Development Policy (CONEVAL). This council made a first effort to
include social cohesion among indicators for development, this indicator
includes the strategic planning of the roads, however, this program is still being
completed and has not yet been implemented for the state.
For the interview, the director also noted that the secretariat (SEDESORE) itself
has witnessed how accessibility directly influences development; “as an
example, the health secretariat has brigades with wide coverage and very
efficient, but it is different those campaigns than, in some emergency, easily
be able to access the appropriate facilities to be treated” (Meléndez, 2018).
As to the necessary measures for the development of the region, it was
indicated that it is necessary for the representatives of the municipalities to
have initiatives and to work in conjunction with SEDESORE, have feasible
projects to be able to grant greater economic support, as well as to include
social cohesion in the indicators of social development.
In the field of future projections of investment and development, the map of
total investments made by this secretariat in 2017 was shown, so the
investment trend is clear and the projects encourage investment where there
are higher concentrations of vulnerable population.
112
Likewise, it was told that the Secretariat will continue to make investments for
infrastructure and also that an effective way to support the growth of these
communication roads, as has already been done in some cases, is to provide
the inhabitants with materials and train them, so they can build the roads
themselves. “This is an effective way to expand the network because it cuts
spending and the sense of care and belonging to the place grows” (Meléndez,
2018).
Figure 6.5 investments made during 2017 by SEDESORE (Meléndez, 2018).
113
Infrastructure development plans
One of the state secretariats in Mexico is the Secretariat of Communications
and Transportation (SCT), which is responsible for planning and coordinating
all the infrastructure and of course transportation and communications
projects. San Luis Potosí, has a state board that supports local infrastructure
(JEC), however, the SCT is responsible for state plans and, therefore, the
regional infrastructure that gives accessibility between municipalities.
Within this secretariat, in the department of San Luis Potosí, in the
infrastructure under secretariat, is a biologist in charge of the projects
sustainability. This coordinator is the engineer Fernando Espinoza, who was
interviewed, talking about the conception of sustainability the SCT has for the
state.
During the first phase of the interview, the biologist was asked about the
importance attributed to the state by the Altiplano region. The area is not
properly recognized for its environmental richness, the problem is the usual
comparison with the most obvious values such as the ones from the Huasteca
(waterfalls, cenotes, etc.), however, this region is very rich in terms of
biodiversity, and the adaptability the communities, flora and fauna of the
Altiplano are forced to overcome, is difficult to match, he said.
"Its importance lies precisely in the difference it presents to other regions of
the state, it is important to understand that within this state very different
scenarios are managed, despite not having access to the sea, in this state we
have everything and they complement each other, therefore, it is impossible
to compare" (Espinoza, 2018).
Likewise, he said that in terms of planning, unfortunately, there is no integral
planning for road infrastructure, usually the projects are divided by
municipalities or states. The projects that have been carried out during this
114
year, have been first evaluated through a preliminary study on the route; the
current method is to obtain the coordinates, walk the area and observe species
or signs of species living around the area, and in this way, to reduce the impact
generated by new access roads.
As for the required measures for a better development for the Altiplano
region, the biologist indicated that the cultural and ecological value of the
region must be promoted. “One of the solutions could be ecological tourism”,
he added, “places like the waterfalls in San Bartolo, grottos of Guadalcázar, the
lakes in Venado, the area where fossils are found in Charcas; if the people
knew and we gave support to the local communities, the economic benefit
would be superior. Support in the infrastructure tourists need such as lodging,
food and transportation. Accessibility to these places is fundamental”.
Finally, he indicated that for the near future, the development of the areas
surrounding Highway 49 and 51 is evident; "those areas will continue to grow
and attract investments," he responded.
6.3 Consistency and contradictions in the development plans for the
Altiplano
As first obstacle to the Altiplano regional development, is to find out that the
“sustainability” concept by each secretariat, include very different goals, and
that almost each of them, comprehend opposite objectives; while the
economic branch conceives this as an economical reinforcement for
population, the social sphere seeks equity among the communities, just as the
SCT pursues the human - environmental balance. This is a very outstanding
topic to overcome the difficulties within the region; in order to achieve each
objective, the support of other secretariats is indispensable and when this
communication does not exist, the results are only provisional.
115
Within each secretariat strategy, it is evident the lack of communication
between them in order to influence the mindsets to have a more specific
common agreement; until now, the projects tend to be handled separately and
privately from one organization to another.
As a common denominator, it was also found that the so-called "regional"
plans are usually a set of plans that seek to benefit only some municipalities
(within the Altiplano) and implement strategies for them, without looking at
the impact of these decisions on other communities.
Likewise, the secretariats present concordances taking as an objective the
development of the main cities: Matehuala, Charcas and Salinas, in its
population growth and, consequently, the demand of this new population will
also raise.
In the next table, an extract is shown with the standards for sustainable
regional development, according to these three secretariats.
As can be appreciated, each on these secretariats have different perceptions
of the reality in the Altiplano, despite having the same instruments and laws
to generate strategies.
116
Secretariat General
objectives Priorities
Municipalities receiving
more efforts
Meaning of sustainability
Regional projects
Identified deficiencies
Regional strengths
Future projections
SEDECO
To expand the number
of jobs to increase
GDP among the
population
To attract industrial
investments
More future investments increasing
manufacturing jobs
None None
Mining, commerce
and manufacturing
Growth of Matehuala industrial
zone, more GDP
SEDESORE
To decrease the social
gap between the
state communities
To improve housing quality,
access to education and health
and services
Equal conditions for
the population
None
Lack of accessibility indicators for social
gap
Mining and commerce
The social development
of Matehuala,
Catorce, Charcas and
Venado
SCT
To promote quality, agile and efficient
public services for
the inhabitants of the State
Expand and improve the
quality of the road network
Growth of the road network
without altering the
environment
None
Lack of accessibility
to some remote
communities with
potential to attract tourists
Mining and tourism
Growth in Matehuala and Salinas
Table 6.6 Differences and similarities between state secretariats (Gallegos, 2018)
117
7 Interpretation and assessment:
The role of connectivity in sustainable
regional development
As the science of networks indicates, systems are more than just the set of
their units; its complexity increases because it also involves their behaviors as
part of the system and interactions, which can be disconcerting (Watts, 2006).
Within the region, the strong affinity from the state government to
concentrate efforts in certain municipalities is evident. Despite having as a
common objective, the welfare and development of the population, each
secretariat has its own way of processing information and guidelines
generated by the state legislative power.
These disparities in the way of thinking on the part of each organism, have
generated incomplete results that generate short-term benefits, leaving the
secretariat that implemented this strategy hands tied to complete and deepen
their help and make these projects truly sustainable for the region.
In addition to the different methods and priorities from the state government,
it is necessary to implement, especially in this complex state with so many
diverse cultures and ecosystems, a regional perspective, since what has been
conceived up to now as "regional plans", they are just the gathering of every
result and project of the included municipalities, without being properly
processed, agreed or articulated among all the involved sides for results that
does not create disadvantages to any community.
The disparity between all the communities within the Altiplano, requires
integral programs derived from a sustainable regional approach, where the
interests and needs of each secretariat and each population are defined; this
118
way, it will be possible to avoid the individual interests of each agency and
community.
The resources the Altiplano region has, are being only used by a few
municipalities, when standardizations and comparisons emerge, competition
among communities is generated to obtain external attention and investments
by all means; because population growth concentration is conceived as the
only way to develop, creating uncontrollable expansive urbanizations that
grow in such an accelerated way, that it is not possible to properly manage the
internal structure, food flows, education and health facilities, among other
population needs.
The regional development must keep these precepts of hyper concentration
away from their objectives, because this contrasts with the long - term vision,
and just as the "tragedy of the commons" dilemma, the resources of this
territory are subject to competitions between municipalities and scarcity is not
beneficial for any community.
There is a risk in attracting investment and justifying it as means of
regenerating local and regional economies and generating employment even
at the risk of bankrupting their treasuries. As a result, such competition is
undermining the potential long-term benefits. Their main development
strategy, they are a pure waste since they do not lead to a significant increase
in welfare at the local, or the national level (Pike, Rdz. Pose, & Tomaney, 2006).
119
8 Conclusion
8.1 Review of objectives
The state of San Luis Potosí has proved to be a wide diverse state; it is possible
to observe big differences in the way each region develops; therefore, this
investigation aims to be an instrument to understand in a more concrete way,
the particularities of the Altiplano region, which throughout this work, proved
to have a different kind of complexity from other regions in San Luis Potosí.
For the development of this work, it has been vitally important to observe the
benefits that come with addressing the aptitudes and needs of the
communities on a regional scale, because as noted, some problems are bigger
than the localities themselves, and also, it is impossible to solve them with
strategies with a general scope such as the ones promoted for the entire state.
Likewise, the support the Altiplano population requires for the internal
balance and, this way, to impulse the sustainable regional development, are
not completely assimilated by the state authorities, which don’t have a good
articulation between them and, although together are seeking only the
population welfare, they are not yet able to lay on accurate tools to fully know
the impact every decision produce.
It is true that each secretariat performs well in achieving its own objectives,
however, within this investigation it was possible to verify that the decisions
taken by each organization, indirectly influence the results of the others, and
also that each secretariat, has very different purposes for the region.
Within the state, a municipal focus prevails, which generates fragmentation
among the communities due to competition for resources and opportunities
to which they are coerced, without having the opportunity to find among them
a complement for the common benefit.
120
These praxes have generated that the interests of the municipalities with
greater economy and population, naturally win these competitions, in order
to direct the state strategies which, represent more benefits for them. In this
way, the concentration of resources has been accelerated in municipalities
such as Matehuala, Charcas and Salinas, forcing the population of other
localities to enhance these territories to improve their lifestyle and, thus, the
imbalance within the region, increases.
These imbalances are deeply reflected in the physical structure for
connectivity and in the facilities to provide the most basic needs that by
constitutional right every Mexican must have access to. As mentioned in
chapter five, it is evident the concentration pattern and the lack of regional
instruments for the strategic planning of physical elements and internal
connectivity within the region.
The very elements that make the Altiplano such a particular region within the
state are seen by state secretariats as weaknesses, such as the low annual
precipitation (average rainfall of 460mm per year), the tendency of the
population to settle in a dispersed manner and the climatic adversities,
however, with a regional approach, these same obstacles determine that the
particular Altiplano productivity, with a strategic connectivity, complement
the rest of the state, because these types of productions are not carried out in
any other municipalities.
121
8.2 Recommendations
The first obstacle found to deepen the analysis within this investigation, was
the lack of information or the inconsistency of some of this information,
because due to the different data bases that have been generated during the
last years, it has not been possible to make a proper comparison between the
connectivity network through the years.
Likewise, due to the available regional information, in the educational field,
the results have been skewed in some municipalities, as well as in those
related to health, since the type of health facility is not indicated in greater
detail nor the quality of those found in each location.
The free access and distribution of data in dependencies such as the
Government Education Secretariat of the State of San Luis Potosí, has different
data from those shown by INEGI, however, they are not represented
cartographically, so the complementation of data for investigations such as
this presented for regional development, is crucial.
The sharing of data and strategies by the secretariats through state
organizations created specifically for these articulations, would also represent
an advance towards successful planning to benefit this region.
It is also necessary to create regional organizations capable of managing the
specific needs of each region, with the aim of solving problems in a sustainable
way, since the demands of the state capital generate burdens to other sectors
that do not have the infrastructure or the skills to satisfy them in a sustainable
manner.
122
8.3 Further research demands
As a continuation of this research, it is possible to create a local accessibility
study for each community within the Altiplano, since quality services for this
population are, as previously shown, inaccessible for a large number of
localities, as well as separating basic needs that each community manifests.
During this investigation, it was difficult to obtain reliable statements due to
the inconsistency of some statistics; it is necessary to deepen information on
education, health and infrastructure, so that these statistics represent a more
determinant tool to make decisions by the authorities.
The type of routes that students must daily travel in order to access the school
facilities, as well as the relationship between this connectivity and the
percentage of abdication by the population, are data that would also
complement this type of regional studies.
123
9 Appendix
Appendix A Example of questions for the interviews
124
Appendix B Example of a map provided to the interviewees for graphic descriptions.
125
Appendix C Mining location and orography within the region Own elaboration based on federal data (INEGI & SLP GOB, 2016).
126
Appendix D Type of agriculture inside the Altiplano region Own elaboration based on federal data (INEGI & SLP GOB, 2016).
Continuous mechanized
Seasonal mechanized
127
10 References
Acevedo, J., & Bocarejo, J. (2009). Movilidad sostenible: una construcción
multidisciplinaria. Ingeniería, Bogotá, 72-74.
Albarrán, A. S. (2016). Sociología rural y nueva ruralidad sur-sur. Cuaderno
Venezolano de Sociología, 49-63.
Álvarez, U. C. (2009). Estructuras regionales emergentes y desarrollo turístico
sustentable: la región costa sur de Nayarit, México. Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco:
Universidad de Guadalajara. Centro Universitario de la Costa.
Asuad, N. (2014). Teorías de la distribución espacial de las actividades económicas.
Mexico City: UNAM.
Bataillon, C. (1993). Las regiones geográficas en México. Cd. México: Siglo veintino
editores.
Caillods, F. (1983). School mapping and micro-planning in education. UNESCO.
Cambridge dictionary. (2018, May). Connectivity definition. Retrieved from
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/es/diccionario/ingles/connectivity
Cambridge Dictionary. (2018, May). Meaning of “sustainability” in the English
Dictionary. Retrieved from
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/sustainability
Casado, J. (2008). Estudios sobre movilidad cotidiana en México. Revista
electrónica de geografía y ciencias sociales.
Celis, F. (1988). El espacio, la región y la regionalización.
128
Chillón, P., Panter, J., Corder, J., Jones, A., & Van Sluijs, E. (2015). A longitudinal
study of the distance that young people walk to school. Health Place, 133-
137.
Christaller, W. (1933). Die zentrale Orte in Suddeutschland. Darmstadt.
Corey, K. E., & Wilson, M. I. (2006). Urban and regional technology planning. New
York, USA: Routledge Taylor & Francis group.
De Carvalho, J., & Fogliatti, M. (2016). Methodology for leading indicators on
sustainable regional development. Revista de Administração Pública - RAP,
395-423.
Di Virgilio, M. (2011). La movilidad residencial: una preocupación sociológica.
Territorios, 173-190.
Dick, E., Inkoom, D., Teodoro , K., & Gaesing, K. (2016). Descentralisation and
regional development. Springer Geography.
EDC. (2013). Access to Education in Rural Areas of Mali. Educational Development
Center. Retrieved from Educational Development Center:
http://idd.edc.org/sites/idd.edc.org/files/Mali%20Rural%20Ed%20EDC_0.pdf
Elahi, A., & Elahi, M. (2006). Data, netwok and internet communications technology.
New York, USA: Thomson Delmar learning.
ESANUT. (2013). Informes 2012. Mexico City: ESANUT.
Espinoza, F. (2018). The structural network of the Altiplano. (V. Gallegos,
Interviewer)
FAO. (2006). Food Security - Policy Brief. Rome, Italy: FAO.
129
Figueroa, O., & Rozas, P. (2005). Conectividad, ámbitos de impacto y desarrollo
territorial. CEPAL.
García-Bellido, J. (2000). Ildefonso Cerdá y el nacimiento de la urbanística. Scripta
Nova, Universidad de Barcelona.
Gutiérrez Chaparro, J. (2009). Planeación urbana en México: un análisis crítico
sobre su proceso. Redalyc, Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina,
el Caribe, España y Portugal, 52-63.
Hatzichronoglou, T. (1996). Globalisation and competitiveness : relevant indicators.
Paris, Francia: OECD.
Herranz, J. (2015). Academic training in the certification of medical facilities in
Mexico. Horizonte Sanitario, 37 - 41.
Hottes, R. (1997). Werk und Leben Walter Christallers. Angewandte Geographie.
INEGI. (1985). Geographic synthesis of the state of San Luis Potosi. Mexico City:
INEGI.
INEGI. (2011). Población rural y urbana. Retrieved from
http://cuentame.inegi.org.mx/poblacion/rur_urb.aspx?tema=P
INEGI. (2018, July). Acerca de INEGI, quiénes somos. Retrieved from
http://www.beta.inegi.org.mx/inegi/quienes_somos.html
INEGI. (2018). Mexico en cifras. Retrieved from
http://www.beta.inegi.org.mx/app/areasgeograficas/#
INEGI, & SLP GOB. (2016). Anuario estadístico y geográfico de San Luis Potosí.
Mexico City: INEGI.
130
Iracheta, A. (2001). Planeación Regional en México. México D.F.
ITER INEGI. (2016). Principales resultados por localdad. Ciudad de México.
Jiménez-Jiménez, J., de Hoyos-Martínez, J., & Álvarez-Vallejo, A. (2014).
Transporte urbano y movilidad, hacia una dinámica urbana sustentable y
competitiva. Quivera, 39-53.
Johnston, P., Everard, M., Santillo, D., & Robert, K.-H. (2007). Reclaiming the
Definition of Sustainability. Env Sci Pollut Res, 60-66.
Khalifa, M., & Salheen, M. (2014). Understanding urban segragation in Cairo: The
social and spatial logic of a fragmented city. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates:
Smart, sustainable and healthy cityes.
Kindsein. (2013). IWALK: Caminar a la escuela. Retrieved from
http://www.kindsein.com/es/24/2/566/
Klapka, P., Halás, M., & Tonev, P. (2013). Functional Regions: Concept and Types.
International colloquium on regional sciences, 94-101.
Korstanje, M. (2013). Homo Mobilis, la nueva era de la movilidad. Alteridades,
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Iztapalapa.
László, J. (2014). Historical Tales and National Identity. An Introduction to Narrative
Social Psychology. London: Routledge.
Lösch, A. (1978). The economics of location. In Translation by William H. Woglom.
Westford, Massachusetts: Yale University Press.
LXI Legislatura SLP. (2018, June). H. Congreso del Estado de San Luis Potosí,
Legislaciones. Retrieved from
http://congresosanluis.gob.mx/legislacion/leyes
131
Malaver, M., Rivera, H., & Alvarez, L. (2010). La ciencia de las redes, la conectividad
y la sociedad. Barcelona, Paidos.
Martner, C., Balbuena, A., Bustos, A., & De La Torre, E. (2008). Transporte y
territorio, movilidad regional en San Juan del Río. Santiago de Querétaro,
Qro.: Instituto mexicano del transporte.
Meléndez, B. (2018). Social development for the Altiplano. (V. Gallegos, Interviewer)
Mendel University in Brno. (2010). Classification of regions. Retrieved from Faculty
of Regional Development and International Studies:
https://is.mendelu.cz/eknihovna/opory/zobraz_cast.pl?cast=62192
Mexican Republic Government. (2018). Obras para ti, región Centro - Norte.
Retrieved from https://www.gob.mx/sct/articulos/obrasparati-region-centro-
norte
Mexican Republic Gobernment. (2013). Reforma Educativa. Retrieved from
https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/2924/Resumen_Ejecutivo_
de_la_Reforma_Educativa.pdf
Meyenberg, Y. (2012). Los intereses públicos y la gobernanza. Revista del Colegio
de San Luis, 68-87.
Molinatti, F., Rojas-Cabrera, E., & Peláez, E. (2014). Movilidad residencial
intraurbana en contextos de escasos recursos. Córdoba (Argentina). Revista
Bitácora Urbano Territorial, 31-39.
Moncayo, E. (2001). Modelos de desarrollo regional: teorías y factores
determinantes.
Montes, J. (2018). The Altiplano economic perception. (V. Gallegos, Interviewer)
132
Montoya, R. (2013). Guía de investigación del pasado colonial potosino. San Luis
Potosí: UASLP.
Morong R., G., & Sánchez E., E. (2006). Thinking northe: The historiographic
construction of the frontier space in the context of the 1883 - 1929
chilenization. Universidad de Tarapacá, ciencias históricas y geográficas, 95-
112.
OECD. (1992). Structural competitiveness: definition. Organización para la
Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico.
OECD. (2016). Health Care Resources. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development .
OECD. (2017, June). Organization for Economic Co.operation and Development.
Retrieved from Regional Development:
http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/regionaldevelopment.htm
OECD. (2018). Health at a Glance, OECD indicators. Paris, France: Organisation
for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Palacios, J. (1983). El concepto de región. Revista iInteramericana de Planificación,
56-68.
Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Tomaney, j. (2006). Local and Regional
Development. New York City, USA: Routledge.
Podestá A., J. (2011). Regiones fronterizas y flujos culturales: La peruanidad en una
región chilena. Universum, 123-137.
Powell, P. (1945). The Chichimecas: Scourge of the Silver Frontier in Sixteenth-
century Mexico. Hispanic American Historical Review.
133
Powell, P. (1996). La guerra Chichimeca. Mexico City: FCE.
Rodríguez-Oreggia, E. (2007). Winners and losers of regional growth in Mexico and
their dynamics. Investigación económica, 43-62.
Rosales, M. (2009). Definición e importancia del desarrollo regional., (p. 15).
Valparaíso, Chile.
Rozas, P., & Figueroa, O. (2005). Conectividad, ámbitos de impacto y desarrollo
territorial. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.
S. L., & D. J. (2008). Cities with atributes: conectivity, accesibility and mobility.
Ciudades: Instituto Universitario de Urbanística de la Universidad de
Valladolid, 13-32. Retrieved from
http://www3.uva.es/iuu/REVISTA/Ciudades%2011/Ciudades%2011%20013
-032%20SANTOS%20y%20DE%20LAS%20RIVAS.pdf
Safe Routes. (2018). National Center for Safe Routes to School . Retrieved from
http://www.saferoutesinfo.org
Salguero, J. (2006). Enfoques sobre algunas teorías referentes al desarrollo
regional. Bogotá, Colombia.
San Luis Potosí State Government . (2015). State Development Plan 2015 - 2021.
San Luis Potosí, Mexico: COPLADE.
Sassen, S. (1999). The global city. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
SCT. (2012). Reglamento de Tránsito en Carreteras y Puentes de Jurisdicción.
Mexico City.
SECTUR. (2015). Secretaría de Turismo del Estado de San Luis Potosí, Informe
anual. San Luis Potosí: Gobierno del Estado.
134
SEDECO. (2009). Regiones de San Luis Potosí, Generalidades. San Luis Potosí:
Gobierno del Estado de San Luis Potosí.
SEDECO. (2016). Secretariat of Economic Development of the State, Economic
Panorama of San Luis Potosí. San Luis Potosí.
SEDECO. (2017). Indicadores básicos por municipio. San Luis Potosí: Gobierno de
San Luis Potosí.
SEDECO. (2017). Panorama Económico del Estado de San Luis Potosí. San Luis
Potosí: State Governmento of San Luis Potosí.
SEDECO. (2017). THE REPORT, San Luis Potosí 2017. San Luis Potosí, SLP:
Secretaría de Desarrollo Económico.
SEDECO. (2018). Archivo Histórico Lic. Antonio Rocha. San Luis Potosí, SLP:
Gobierno del Estado de San Luis Potosí.
SEDECO. (2018). Indicador Trimestral de la Actividad Económica Estatal . San Luis
Potosí, SLP: SEDECO.
SEDECO. (2018). Quiénes somos. Retrieved from
http://beta.slp.gob.mx/SEDECO/Paginas/QUIENES%20SOMOS.aspx
SEDESOL. (2015). Secretariat of Social Development SEDESOL. Retrieved from
http://www.microrregiones.gob.mx/catloc/contenido.aspx?refnac=24028000
1
SEDESOL. (2018). Informa anual sobre la situación de pobreza y rezago social
2018. Retrieved from
https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/288967/San_Luis_Potos_.
135
SEDESORE. (2014). Diagnóstico microrregional de Altiplano 2014. San Luis Potosí,
Mexico: SEDESORE.
SEDESORE. (2016). Diagnóstico microregional Altiplano Oeste. San Luis Potosi:
Gobierno del Estado 2015 - 2021.
SEDESORE. (2018). Who we are. Retrieved from
http://www.sedesore.gob.mx/sedesore/index.php
Statista. (2018). The 30 largest countries in the world by total area. Retrieved from
https://www.statista.com/statistics/262955/largest-countries-in-the-world/
The World Bank Group. (2018). United Nations Population Division.
Torres, F. (2006). Pioneros del conocimiento regional en México. Mexico, D.F.:
UNAM.
UANL. (2018). Observatorio de la sustentabilidad de Nuevo León. Retrieved from
http://observatorio.iinso.uanl.mx/index.php/diagnostico/diagnostico-
01/diagnostico-0101?start=1
Vela & Solanes. (2016). Atlas del México prehispánico. Mexico City: Arqueología
mexicana.
Velasco, A. E., Maldonado, P., & Torres, J. C. (2007). Desigualdad del desarrollo
regional en México. Revista latinoamericana de economía, UNAM, 87-102.
Verdu, D. (2014). Cuentos históricos y la identidad nacional. Revista de Estudios
Sociales, Universidad de Los Andes, 229-232.
Watts, D. (2006). Seis grados de separación. La ciencia de las redes en la era del
acceso. Barcelona, Spain: Paidós.
136
Zapata R., T. (2013). Etnicidad e identidad étnica guachichil en el Tunal 1560 –
1620. San Luis Potosí: Colegio de San Luis, SLP.
Zelinsky, W. (1971). The hypothesis of the mobility transition. Geographical review,
219-249.
Zottmann, A. (1949). Dr. Habil. August Lösch. gestorben am 30. Mai 1945.
Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 28-34.