the road less traveled…. hopefully!! dispute resolution

25
THE ROAD LESS TRAVELED…. HOPEFULLY!! Dispute Resolution

Upload: mariah-care

Post on 14-Dec-2015

225 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

THE ROAD LESS TRAVELED….HOPEFULLY!!

Dispute Resolution

Goals for DR Discussion:

Context Proactive remindersDispute resolution

Review basicsTips and resourcesBest/promising practices

Context: Why Now?

How many disputes have you experienced?

How many times have you issued written notification?

An ounce of prevention….

Liaison and staff trainingLEA MV monitoring (include DR

review)Tracking technical assistance and

complaintsInforming advocacy groupsUsing feasibility worksheets

An ounce of prevention (cont”d)

Clear expectationsTrauma-informed practiceWithholding judgmentState advisory board with

providers and liaisons (parents, if possible)

Review DR – focus group with liaisons

Legislative Mandate

‘‘(E) ENROLLMENT DISPUTES.—If a dispute arises over school selection or enrollment in a school—‘‘(i) the child or youth shall be immediately admitted to the school in which enrollment is sought, pending resolution of the dispute;

‘‘(ii) the parent or guardian of the child or youth shall be provided with a written explanation of the school’s decision regarding school selection or enrollment, including the rights of the parent, guardian, or youth to appeal the decision;

‘‘(iii) the child, youth, parent, or guardian shall be referred to the local educational agency liaison designated under paragraph (1)(J)(ii), who shall carry out the dispute resolution process as described in paragraph (1)(C) as expeditiously as possible after receiving notice of the dispute; and

‘‘(iv) in the case of an unaccompanied youth, the homeless liaison shall ensure that the youth is immediately enrolled in school pending resolution of the dispute.

Paragraph (g)(1)(C)

‘‘(g) STATE PLAN.—

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Each State shall submit to the Secretary a plan to provide for the education of homeless children and youths within the State. Such plan shall include the following:

‘‘(A) A description of how such children and youths are (or will be) given the opportunity to meet the same challenging State academic achievement standards all students are expected to meet.

‘‘(B) A description of the procedures the State educational agency will use to identify such children and youths in the State and to assess their special needs.

‘‘(C) A description of procedures for the prompt resolution of disputes regarding the educational placement of homeless children and youths.

US Department of Education 2004 Non-Regulatory Guidance – G-5 &

G-9

Written notice – school decision, reason, right to appeal

If disputed: Immediately enroll in school of choice Refer to liaison to carry out DRP

G-5 - Inter-district enrollment disputes should be resolved at the SEA level

G-9 - SEA process to appeal LEA DRP decisions

Critical Components of a Dispute Resolution Process

Local procedure implemented by the liaison

Written notificationImmediate enrollment in school of

preference during dispute resolutionInformal and accessiblePer guidance, must have an SEA level

of appeal

Written Notice

Contact information for liaison and SCSimple, detachable form to complete and

submit to initiate dispute (school should give parent a copy)

Step-by-step description of appeal process

Notice of right to immediately enrollNotice of right to appeal to stateTimelines for LEA and SEA level appeals

Disputable Issues:

EligibilitySchool selectionParticipationTransportation

Transportation

ContractMode of transportation offered

Participation

Regular classesOther special programs for which student is eligible (e.g., special ed, gifted ed)

Field tripsAfter school activities (???)

School Selection

SOO (possibly 2)Local schoolOther school children in the residency

area can attend

Eligibility

Challenge: protect students and schoolsTrain liaisons to explain definition and

determination to parent/studentChecklistSample eligibility letter or written

notice?

Recommendation: “Gray” case – use written notice and DR

Types of conflicts

DISPUTABLENONCOMPLIANCE

NOT COMPLIANCE/BENEFICIAL

NOT MV

McKinney-Vento Disagreements(Disputable)

Remaining in school of originImmediate enrollment in school of

residencyHomeless status when student was

appropriately identified as homeless previously (e.g., doubled-up in same location for two years)

Homeless status questioned due to additional information

MV compliance – not dispute

School failed to inform of MV educational rights

Student is not provided free mealsSystemic non-compliance by an LEA

which requires state intervention (failure to identify homelessness; lack of outreach and coordination within schools and community)

Not MV Compliance:Services are allowable/beneficial

Preschool student could benefit from school of origin transportation

Additional activities could enhance homeless identification (e.g., using a residency questionnaire)

Summer school could improve student’s academic performance but is not required to pass a course

Not MV

Student wishes to enroll in a school that is not an option for students in the residency area and is not a school of origin

Parent disagrees with the services being offered in an IEP

Student never lost housing

Let’s practice

Scenario # 1

You receive a call from a school. Mother is residing in a motel. She has moved from another distant state where she sold her home. She is in the motel while deciding where to buy her home. She wants to enroll her children in a school of her choice. It is not the local school for the motel. Mom claims she can enroll her children there under McKinney-Vento.

Scenario # 2

Family, identified as homeless and doubled up last year, is still residing with same family as a new school year begins. School tells family that the children must enroll in the local school this year.

Scenario # 3

14 year old from another country is sent to live with her 18 year old sister. The liaison has explored the reason for the move and is told that the schools are better here and the family wants the child to have an education. Despite questions, the family does not identify loss of housing or economic hardship as a reason for the move. After the school denied enrollment, the sister is claiming homelessness.

Documentation to maintain

Clear, concise description of the issueTimeline of contacts (school, SEA,

parent/youth)Emails between school and parentLog of phone contacts and meetingsBest interest determinationEligibility information