the right choice commonwealth secondary school commonwealth secondary school (autonomous since 1995)...
TRANSCRIPT
the right choice
CommonwealthSecondary SchoolCommonwealthSecondary School(autonomous since 1995)
A Case Study on Building a Sustainable Eco-System for School-wide Curriculum
InnovationGlobal Education Conference
12 July 2012
Presenters: Mrs Cheah Mei Ling, Principal
Miss Britta Seet, ex-HOD/Curriculum Innovation and DevelopmentMr Yuen Kah Mun, HOD/Humanities
Background Making-A-Difference@Commonwealth
Programme (M.A.D.@CSS)o Planningo Implementation
M.A.D.@CSS Programme Evaluation Findings
Learning Points
Outline
In 2009 Review of school vision to determine progress Articulate desired outcomes of Commonwealth Graduate
Gaps identified Vision: ‘illuminate new frontiers’ not fully addressed Innovation culture could be strengthened Desired student outcomes:
Creative Problem Solver Environment Champion Servant Leader Driven by Purpose and Passion
Wanted: A school-wide programme to address the gaps, and catalyse a culture of innovation and experimentation
Background
Adapted from Future Problem Solving Programme Futures-based orientation Supports the development of 21st century
skills, focusing on creative and critical thinking, and research skills
Making-A-Difference @Commonwealth Programme (M.A.D.@CSS)
To develop students to integrate disciplinary knowledge adeptly to produce novel solutions that address future problems, and hence make a difference to the world community
Student outcomes: Develop Commonwealthians as creative and
critical thinkers and problem-solvers Encourage Commonwealthians to contribute
back to the community
M.A.D.@CSS: Planning Objectives
School-based 3-year Problem Solving Curriculum Target audience: Sec 1 – 3 Exp / NA /NT Design Principles
Progression Skills, Scope
Relevance and Coherence Students see the applicability to daily life and
inclined to use it Knowing and Doing (Most of the time, if not all)
Challenging yet Achievable
M.A.D.@CSS: PlanningDesign Principles
M.A.D.@CSS: PlanningThe Curriculum
Students are taught 4-step Creative Problem Solving Process and associated thinking tools
Fact Finding
• Gathering the data• Defining the problem
Idea Finding• Producing ideas• Developing ideas
Solution Finding• Evaluating and selecting
solutions• Developing an action plan• Implementing an action plan
Project Reviewing• Evaluating project outcomes• Reflecting on learning process• Identifying gaps for further
development• Proposing strategies to address gaps
Affinity DiagramIshikawa Diagram
BrainstormingSCAMPER, Force-Fitting,Idea Box
Diagnostic Thinking
Divergent Thinking
Convergent Thinking
Reflective Thinking
Reflective Journaling
Evaluation Matrix,ALoU, Hits & Hot Spots
M.A.D.@CSS: PlanningThe Curriculum
Level
Teaching Focus
Context Theme Inter-Disciplinary
Sec 1
Ability(Process, Tools)
Futures Problem Solving (FPS)
Environment
Environmental EducationEnglish LanguageProject Work / Service Learning
Sec 2
Sensitization
Community Problem Solving (CMPS)
Enabled Living
Project WorkService Learning
Sec 3
Inclination Global Problem Solving (GPS)
Governance
Humanities / Social Studies
Developmental (ASI) approach; rehearsal in different contexts
M.A.D.@CSS: PlanningThe A.B.C.D. Eco-System
Identify Champion (s)Signal Importance
Engage Stakeholders
TimeResources; Funds
InfrastructureManpowerPartners
Student PlatformsTeacher Platforms
Formal TrainingSupport
ADVOCACY BACKING
DEMONSTRATION CAPACITY
2010 2011 2012
Sec 1 CMPS FPS FPS
Sec 2 CMPS CMPS
Sec 3 GPS (1 class)
M.A.D.@CSS: ImplementationApproach
Phased rolled-out
M.A.D.@CSS: ImplementationDeployment
ADVOCACY Actions
Identify Champions
• Creation of post of HOD/Curriculum Innovation and Development
• Supported by interdisciplinary MAD Committee
Signal Importance
• Annual theme to focus the school on creativity and innovation
• Setting up MAD Seed Fund by students for students• Setting up MAD Award to recognise outstanding
student teams
Engage Stakeholders
Communications to staff, students, parents, community
M.A.D.@CSS: ImplementationDeployment
BACKING Actions
Time Allocating 1 hour per week for 1 semester for Sec 1 and 2
Funds / Resources
• Autonomous School Teaching and Learning Fund• Cluster Innovation Fund
Infrastructure
Set up MAD Lab - flexible setups that facilitate ideation as well as collaborative and independent group work; leverage on ICT
Manpower 2 form teachers per class for lower sec to teach MAD
Partners Tapping on community resources and leadership
M.A.D.@CSS: ImplementationDeployment
CAPACITY
Actions
Formal Training
• Phased approach for FPSP Coach Training: o Committee Members: Core teamo Teachers: Just in time
• School-based training for all staff
Support • Modeling by HOD/CID - Group lectures• Handholding by HOD/CID and Comm Members
o Clarity of Instructions; Briefings to check understanding; Co-teaching;
• Allocation of 1 hr per week for teacher conferencing• Development of curricular resources• Setting up e-portal for easy access to resources
M.A.D.@CSS: ImplementationDeployment
DEMONSTRATION
Actions
Student Platforms
• Student Thinking Festival• MAD Award Presentation• Participation in FPSP National Competitions and
other platforms
Teacher Platforms
• Staff Learning Festival• Inter-school Sharing• Cluster and National Platforms• Leverage on status as Centre of Excellence
Rapid prototyping design and re-design on the fly
Critical review for improvement to design Stufflebeam’s ‘Context, Input, Process, Product’ (CIPP) Evaluation Model
M.A.D.@CSS:Programme Evaluation
Intuitive process Structured process
Greater awareness and appreciation of discussed issues action to support and promote cause
Self-regulated and collaborative learning
M.A.D.@CSS: EvaluationStudent Feedback (Lower Sec)
Strengths
What students say Improvements made
More time to learn, practise, discuss…
Institute routines for students, for e.g. pre-lesson preparatory work
Greater clarity of explanation
Provide more examples to illustrate the applicability of the tools
Improve learning environment & experience
Create bigger pool of teacher facilitatorsProvide physical resource
M.A.D.@CSS: EvaluationStudent Feedback (Lower Sec)
AFIs
Sufficient support (resources + training)
Greater awareness and appreciation of discussed issues; acceptance of operating in flexible and ambiguous situations
Dedicated vehicle for 21cc critical and inventive thinking competency
M.A.D.@CSS: EvaluationTeacher Feedback (Lower Sec)
Strengths
What teachers say Improvements made
Lack of opportunity for students to demonstrate attainment of outcomes
Deliberate open-ended assessment (Sec 1)Real-life challenges (Sec 2)
Differentiated T&L Different forms of productsDifferent challenge/focus area
M.A.D.@CSS: EvaluationTeacher Feedback (Lower Sec)
AFIs
M.A.D.@CSS: EvaluationStudent Feedback (Sec 3E)
Pilot – Sec 3I Typical – Sec 3C
Jan 2012 4.1 (out of 10) 6.1
End May 2012 7.2 6.5
Tools Force fitting, Hits & Hot spots, T-chart, Spider diagram Brainwriting, Fishbone
Fishbone, Brainwriting
Applications (Sensitivity)
CCAs – Solving conflicts, script writing, planning of camps, leading juniors, making changes to training programmes
CCAs – Solving conflicts, identifying factors, solutions
Tendency to behave in a certain way(Inclinations)
Thinking out of the box, different perspectives, working together as a group, always do things differently, creativity
Organising, solving problems, more aware, more objective
What teachers say
Very open to questioning, different, active
They are hardworking
M.A.D.@CSS: EvaluationTeacher Feedback (Sec 3E)
Jan 2012 Interventions (Action) Beliefs
Ready only to accept answers presented to them
Searching for answers in their textbook
To build a context for questioning (teaching wrong things to a class)
Learning is fun, desire for accuracy (spotting fallacies in presentation)
Positive interdependence and accountability (cooperative work)
Role modelling and raising metacognition (“What if”, “How about”, “I wonder”)
Celebrating inclinations, specific praise (look out for a thinker, questioner, maverick)
What is worth learning is worth doing … twice (redo worksheets)
Creative problem solver driven by purpose and passion (I will persist)
Change will be slow but it must be steady (I will be patient, and adopt a long view)
Learning PointTo re-structure is not sufficient to re-
culture
Changing formal structures is not the same as changing norms, habits, skills and beliefs
(Fullan, 1993)
Learning Point To re-structure is not sufficient to re-
culture
Identify ChampionSignal Importance
Stakeholder Engagement
TimeResources
FundsInfrastructure
ManpowerPartners
Student PlatformsTeacher Platforms
Formal TrainingSupport
ADVOCACY BACKING
DEMONSTRATION CAPACITY
A.B.C.D. Ecosystem
COMMITMENT TO CHANGE THE CULTURE OF CLASSROOMS AND SCHOOL
SHARED VISIONS
COHERENT PRACTISES
Learning PointShared Visions
Vision must be clear to all stakeholders and actualised concretely 2010 in response to ‘illuminate new frontiers’ – we
developed M.A.D. M.A.D. catalysed conversations about the vision
amongst stakeholders: Evolved vision in 2012 ‘……illuminate new frontiers,
and inspire change for a better world.’ Coherence
Definition of Student Leadership = Problem Solvers M.A.D. therefore is about building student leadership (Our
Mission)
Learning PointCoherent Practices
MAD is not just process and tools; it is about mindset and beliefs, a language for problem solving and innovation
Do teachers see MAD as a program, or as a new habit to be learned, applied, internalised?
Clarity of own values and belief systems about children, education, learning. Is it aligned with vision?
Risk, unfamiliarity of new curriculum and demands – decision on whether and how to engage
Demands of national curriculum conflict with local curriculum What do students experience?
Patience, persistence and a long view 百年樹人
Teachers and SLs - The demands of the ‘academic press’
SLs - Challenge in sustaining the change – beliefs, expertise, effort
Learning PointCommitment to change the culture
We are:
Mrs Cheah Mei Ling, Principal ([email protected])
Miss Britta Seet, Former HOD/Curriculum Innovation and Development ; now VP/Shuqun Sec([email protected])
Mr Yuen Kah Mun, HOD/Humanities([email protected])
Miss Kokila Vani, SH/Combined Humanities and Citizenship([email protected])
Thank You!
Drago-Severson, E. (2009). Leading Adult Learning: Supporting Adult Development in Our Schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin
Joseph, P. B. , Mikel, E.R., & Windstchitl, M.A. (2011). Reculturing Curriculum. In P.B. Joseph (Ed.), Cultures of Curriculum (pp 55 – 77). New York: Routledge.
References