the regional transportation system€¦ · cv kp 78 78 12 18 bw 12 14 51 12 19 mv pd 30 51 60 19 78...
TRANSCRIPT
292035 Regional Transportation Plan Update March 2012
The Regional Transportation System
levels on regional roadways. The growth in traffic volumes over the past 30+ years has been particularly evident on the Beltline and Interstate route system and on the radial arterials beyond this system leading into the Madison area (e.g., USH 151, USH 18/151, USH 12/18, USH 14, and CTH S). The traffic growth was fastest during the 1980s, but it continued to grow until the past several years with the downturn in the economy, the amount of land use development, and higher gas prices. Traffic on most cross-Isthmus arterials has not increased significantly in the past couple of decades with the exception of East Washington Avenue. This is due in part to the lack of employment growth in the downtown area and also to the congestion on these roadways, which has diverted traffic to other routes, particularly the Beltline.
Figure 12 shows the arterial roadway segments that are congested during peak periods in the metropolitan area based on 2006 traffic count data and roadway capacities in the MPO’s regional travel model. There are 229 center lane miles of arterial roadways that are congested and 74 miles that are very congested based on this 2006 data. Much of the congestion and delay
Streets/Roadways and BridgesThe arterial roadway system in the Madison metropolitan area consists of high traffic volume roadways leading into the central Isthmus area in a radial pattern from a circumferential Beltline and Interstate route system. The arterial system also includes several north-south roadways (e.g., Stoughton Rd./USH 51 on the east side and Midvale Blvd. and Gammon Rd. on the west side), completing the network of arterial roadways in the area.
The roadway system is classified into four groups of roadways according to their function, traffic volumes, and the type of service they provide. The four classes are: principal arterials, minor arterials, collectors, and local roadways. Principal arterials are further subdivided into the Interstate system, other freeways, and others. The roadway system is also divided into two groups—urban and rural—based on whether or not the roadway is located within the urban area of a metropolitan area. The functional classification provides a basis for receipt of federal transportation funding. Figure 11 shows the current functional classification of regional roadways in the county, which was approved in 2004. Following the U.S. Census Bureau’s release in 2012 of the new 2010 urbanized area boundaries and the designation of the new adjusted Madison urban area and planning area boundaries by the MPO, the MPO will update the regional roadway functional classification system.
Traffic Growth and Congestion
The growth in households, population, and employment discussed above has led to increasing traffic volumes and congestion
302035 Regional Transportation Plan U
pdateM
arch 2012
((
((
(
(
(
(
(((
(
( (
(
(
(
(
((
(
((
(
//
//
/
/
/
/
///
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
//
/
//
/
ÆÆ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
ÆÆ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
··
·
·
·
·
·
·
··
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
§§
§§
§
§
§
§
§
¨¨
¨¨
¨
¨
¨
¨
¨
¦¦
¦¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
Æ
Æ
Æ
ÆÆÆ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ Æ
Æ
Æ
ÆÆ
Æ
Æ
Æ Æ
Æ
ÆÆ
ÆÆ
Æ
Æ
ÆÆ
ÆÆ
Æ
Æ
Æ
ÆÆ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
ÆÆ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ Æ Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ Æ
ÆÆ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
ÆÆ
ÆÆ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
ÆÆ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
Æ
ÿ
ÿÿ
ÿÿÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿ
ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿ
ÿÿ
ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿÿ
ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿÿ
ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ
ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿÿ
ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿÿ
ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
City of Edgerton
Village of Mazomanie
Village ofBlue Mounds
Village ofMount Horeb
Village ofCross Plains
Village ofBlack Earth
Village ofBelleville
City of Verona
City of Madison
City of Middleton
Village of Waunakee
Village of Dane
Village of DeForest
City of MadisonVillage of
ShorewoodHills
Village ofMaple Bluff
City of Fitchburg
Village ofOregon
City of Stoughton
Village of Brooklyn
Village ofRockdale
Village of Cambridge
Village of Deerfield
Village of Marshall
City of Sun Prairie
Village ofCottage Grove
Village of McFarland
City of Monona
T o w n o f A l b i o nT o w n o f A l b i o nT o w n o f D u n k i r kT o w n o f D u n k i r kT o w n o f R u t l a n dT o w n o f R u t l a n d
T o w n o f O r e g o nT o w n o f O r e g o n
T o w n o f M o n t r o s eT o w n o f M o n t r o s e
T o w n o f P r i m r o s eT o w n o f P r i m r o s eT o w n o f P e r r yT o w n o f P e r r y
T o w n o f B l u e M o u n d sT o w n o f B l u e M o u n d s
T o w n o f S p r i n g d a l eT o w n o f S p r i n g d a l e
T o w n o f V e r o n aT o w n o f V e r o n a T o w n o f D u n nT o w n o f D u n n
T o w n o fT o w n o fP l e a s a n t S p r i n g sP l e a s a n t S p r i n g s T o w n o f C h r i s t i a n aT o w n o f C h r i s t i a n a
T o w n o f D e e r f i e l dT o w n o f D e e r f i e l d
T o w n o f C o t t a g e G r o v eT o w n o f C o t t a g e G r o v e
T o w n o f S u n P r a i r i eT o w n o f S u n P r a i r i e
T o w n o f M e d i n aT o w n o f M e d i n a
T o w n o fT o w n o fB l o o m i n gB l o o m i n g
G r o v eG r o v e
T o w n o fT o w n o fM a d i s o nM a d i s o n
T o w n o fT o w n o fM i d d l e t o nM i d d l e t o nT o w n o f C r o s s P l a i n sT o w n o f C r o s s P l a i n s
T o w n o f V e r m o n tT o w n o f V e r m o n t
T o w n o f B l a c k E a r t hT o w n o f B l a c k E a r t h
T o w n o f B e r r yT o w n o f B e r r y T o w n o f S p r i n g f i e l dT o w n o f S p r i n g f i e l d
T o w n o f T o w n o f W e s t p o r tW e s t p o r t
T o w nT o w n o f o f
B u r k eB u r k e
T o w n o f M a z o m a n i eT o w n o f M a z o m a n i e
T o w n o f R o x b u r yT o w n o f R o x b u r y
T o w n o f D a n eT o w n o f D a n e
T o w n o f V i e n n aT o w n o f V i e n n a
T o w n o f W i n d s o rT o w n o f W i n d s o r
T o w n o f B r i s t o lT o w n o f B r i s t o l T o w n o f Y o r kT o w n o f Y o r k
Crystal LakeFish Lake
Lake Kegonsa
Lake Waubesa
Lake Monona
Lake Wingra
MudLake
Lake Mendota
Rice Lake
LakeKoshkonong
N
A
S
N
N
M
N
D
Y
V
M
M
Q
Q
K
P
F
Y
F
P
MJ
J
J
S
F
E
E
Z
A
H
H
G
G
GJ
U
U
A
MM
D
D
B
A N A
X
N
B
A
W
B
N
B
N
W
ON
T
N
T
C
C
V
I
I
C
V
39
39
39
MC
BB
MS
73
BN
90
BN
MM
KP
12
78
69
92
92
73
CV
KP
78
78
1812
BW
1412
51
12
19
MV
PD
30
51
60
19
78
14
KP
FF
JJ
KP
14
JG
78
ID78
ID18
92
JG
78
JG
PD
PD
92
69 CC
69
PB
PB
92DD
CC
14
MM
51
MM
14
51
51 90
73
AB
MNMN
73
PQ 12
18
AB
BB
94
TT
BB
94
73
19
CV
DV
DM
90
DM 51
TT
TV 89
73 89
113
151
138
113
151
151
188
151
138
138
106
134
V V
V V
113
V V
151
94
Roadway Functional Classification SystemDane County, Wisconsin
´Prepared by staff to the:Principal Arterials - Interstate
Principal Arterials - Other Freeway
Principal Arterials - Others
Minor Arterials
Collectors - Urban
Collectors - Major, Rural
Collectors - Minor, Rural 0 2.5 5
MilesDate: 1/11/2012
User: pldms Date Saved: 12/13/2011 11:28:16 AMPath: U:\ArcMapPrj\Trans\Classes\FunctionalClassesDaneCountyCurrentRoadsPageSize.mxd
Figure 11
312035 Regional Transportation Plan U
pdateM
arch 2012
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!( !(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!( !(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(§̈¦§̈¦
Æÿ Æÿ
Æ·
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
ÆÿÆÿ
§̈¦
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
ÆÿÆÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ(/
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
(/
ÆÿÆÿ
ÆÿÆÿ
Æÿ Æÿ
Æÿ
ÆÿÆÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æ·
Æ·
(/Æÿ
(/Æÿ
(/
Æ·
§̈¦
(/
(/ (/
(/
(/
Æÿ
Æÿ
(/
Æ·
Æ·
Æÿ
Æÿ(/
Æÿ
Æ·
Æ·
(/ §̈¦(/
(/
(/
(/
Æÿ
(/ (/ (/
(/ (/
Æÿ
(/
(/
(/
(/ (/
Æ·
Æÿ
Æ·
§̈¦§̈¦
(/
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
§̈¦
§̈¦
§̈¦
§̈¦
§̈¦
Lake Waubesa
Lake Monona
Lake Wingra
MudLake
Lake Mendota
Village ofCross Plains
City of Verona
City of Madison
City of Middleton
Village of Waunakee
City of MadisonVillage of
ShorewoodHills
Village ofMaple Bluff
City of Fitchburg
City of Sun Prairie
Village ofCottage Grove
Village of McFarland
City of Monona
S S
toughton Rd
Monro
e St
McKee Rd
University Ave
Northport Dr
Nak
oma R
d
Aberg Ave
Century Ave
Willia
mson S
t
N Thom
pson Dr
W Johnson St
John Nolen Dr
Atwood Ave
Milwaukee St
W Beltline Hwy
51
US
H
Ver
ona R
d
Windsor St
E John
son S
t
Anderson St
S Park St
Regent St
Milwaukee St
Campus Dr
Exc
elsi
or D
r
Fis
h H
atch
ery
Rd
Mineral Point Rd
Packers A
ve
Pflaum Rd
Sem
inol
e H
wy
E Wash
ington Ave
N F
air
Oak
s A
ve
Old Sauk RdGam
mon
Rd
Odana Rd
Schroeder Rd
Ple
asan
t Vie
w R
d
Mid
vale
Blv
d
E Buckeye Rd
Cottage Grove Rd
94
90
19
C
C
N
T
TT
T
94
BB
AB
N
N
MN
AB
MN
AB
14
J
PD
PD
J
S
M
K
P
PK
K K
Q
Q
M
M
Q
M
113
19
12P
51CV
151
30
90
51
12 18
18
151
PD
D
19
19
N
M
151
MV
19
113
51 9012
14
12
151
N
14 18 151
12 14
BW
151
151
51
113
S
113
90
94
51
CV
MM
MS
BB
MC
39
39
39
39
2006 Congestion LevelsMadison Area, Dane County
´0 1 2
Miles
Prepared by staff to the:
PRINTED: 8/12/2011NAME: pldms FILE: \\FPS2\DATA2\Users\pldms\ArcMapPrj\Trans\CMP2011\Congestion_Madison_2006_CMP.mxd
Rev: 8/12/11
Arterial Roadway Congestion Levels
Congested
Very Congested
Very Congested Problem Intersections
!( For Auto Traffic
!( For Transit
!( For Auto Traffic and Transit
Figure 12
322035 Regional Transportation Plan Update March 2012
on signalized urban arterial streets occurs at intersections. Figure 12 also shows the intersections that have been identified as most congested both in terms of vehicular traffic and other user conflicts, creating delay for motor vehicles, transit buses, and other users.
The downturn in the economy and the record high price of gasoline in 2008 resulted in a 4.3% decrease in vehicle miles of travel (VMT) in Dane County according to WisDOT estimates. VMT started to increase again in 2009 and 2010, but has yet to reach the same level as 2006. From 2000 to 2006, VMT had increased an average of about 1.5% per year. Table 14 shows estimated VMT in Dane County from 2000 to 2010.
The county VMT estimates prepared by WisDOT are based on the calculation of a state VMT control total based on gasoline sales (and fleet fuel efficiency). County estimates are calculated based on changes in traffic counts from automated traffic recorders, available traffic counts on state highways and local roadways, and an estimation of “remainder” VMT on local roadways where counts aren’t available. MPO staff has developed a methodology for calculating the average weekday VMT on the collector and arterial roadway system within the City of Madison using actual and imputed traffic counts multiplied by the roadway segment length. The City of Madison collects traffic counts on about half of the system each year. The estimated 2010 weekday VMT on this system within the city was 4,738,100, almost the same as in 2009.
Percent ChangePrevious Year
2000 12,497,100 -2001 12,636,700 1.1%2002 13,202,000 4.5%2003 13,256,000 0.4%2004 13,450,000 1.5%2005 13,346,300 -0.8%2006 13,621,900 2.1%2007 13,561,000 -0.4%2008 12,993,400 -4.2%2009 13,214,200 1.7%2010 13,258,300 0.3%
Source: WisDOT
Estimated Daily Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) for Dane County
Year VMT
Table 14
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Fatal Crashes 46 41 43 31 32 33Injury Crashes 3,136 2,938 3,006 2,698 2,451 2,498Property Damage Only 6,016 5,649 6,181 6,659 5,980 6,162TOTAL 9,198 8,628 9,230 9,388 8,463 8,693
Source: Wis. Traffic Operations & Safety Laboratory (from MV 4000 reports)
Dane County Motor Vehicle Crashes by Severity: 2005-2010Table 15
332035 Regional Transportation Plan Update March 2012
Safety
There were a total of almost 8,700 motor vehicle crashes (excluding deer crashes) in Dane County in 2010, including 2,498 injury crashes and 33 fatal crashes. The total number of crashes was up 3% from 2009 and the number of total injury crashes was up 0.7%. The number of crashes has fluctuated since 2005. Table 15 on page 32 shows the number of motor vehicle crashes by severity in Dane County from 2005-2010.
The City of Madison Traffic Engineering Division prepares an annual crash report with statistics, maps, charts, and tables
Pavement conditions
Pavement management allows transportation agency staff to maintain the condition of roadways and reduce pavement maintenance costs through year-to-year monitoring of pavements and facilitating predictions of when to cost effectively undertake roadway preservation work. The Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating (PASER) system is used to assist local communities in evaluating the condition of roadways and setting priorities for road maintenance, repair, and reconstruction. PASER ratings follow a scale of 1-10:
summarizing common factors for crashes, high crash locations, historical trends, and other information. The report is based on a review of “reportable” crashes or crashes that meet statutory requirements for reporting by the state. Crashes are mapped and reviewed by type and other factors such as time of day and weather conditions. The information, including detailed crash diagrams, is used to assist engineers in planning strategies to reduce crashes and identifying possible engineering solutions at specific locations. WisDOT also has a similar program to review crash reports on state highways to identify locations with higher than average crash rates. More detailed crash data analysis is also included as part of corridor studies.
WisDOT uses a more sophisticated pavement evaluation system that includes three different measures. Its Pavement Distress Index (PDI) is the rating most similar to the PASER system.
Table 16 and Figure 13 show the 2009 pavement condition of the local and state arterial and collector roadway system within the Madison Metropolitan Planning Area. Approximately 36% of the local arterial and collector system has a PASER rating of 8-10, 57% has a rating of 5-7, and 7% is rated 4 or below.
Compared to 2005, the percentage of the local system in the best pavement condition category decreased somewhat from 40% to 36% with a corresponding increase in the
PASER Rating Description of Condition8-10 Relatively new road with little or no maintenance required
5-7Road is still in relatively good condition, but routine maintenance(e.g. crack filling) and/or preservative treatment (seal coating, overlay) is required
< 4Structural improvement (thick overlay or recycling of pavement)or total reconstruction is warranted
342035 Regional Transportation Plan U
pdateM
arch 2012
Village ofCross Plains
Village ofBelleville
City of Verona
City of Madison
City of Middleton
Village of Waunakee
Village of Dane
City of MadisonVillage of
ShorewoodHills
Village ofMaple Bluff
City of Fitchburg
Village ofOregon
City of Stoughton
Village of Brooklyn
Village of Cambridge
Village of Deerfield
Village of Marshall
City of Sun Prairie
Village ofCottage Grove
Village of McFarland
City of Monona
T o w n o f A l b i o nT o w n o f A l b i o nT o w n o f D u n k i r kT o w n o f D u n k i r kT o w n o f R u t l a n dT o w n o f R u t l a n d
T o w n o f O r e g o nT o w n o f O r e g o n
T o w n o f M o n t r o s eT o w n o f M o n t r o s e
T o w n o f P r i m r o s eT o w n o f P r i m r o s e
T o w n o f S p r i n g d a l eT o w n o f S p r i n g d a l e
T o w n o f V e r o n aT o w n o f V e r o n a T o w n o f D u n nT o w n o f D u n n
T o w n o fT o w n o fP l e a s a n t S p r i n g sP l e a s a n t S p r i n g s T o w n o f C h r i s t i a n aT o w n o f C h r i s t i a n a
T o w n o f D e e r f i e l dT o w n o f D e e r f i e l d
T o w n o f C o t t a g e G r o v eT o w n o f C o t t a g e G r o v e
T o w n o f S u n P r a i r i eT o w n o f S u n P r a i r i e
T o w n o f M e d i n aT o w n o f M e d i n a
T o w n o fT o w n o fB l o o m i n gB l o o m i n g
G r o v eG r o v e
T o w n o fT o w n o fM a d i s o nM a d i s o n
T o w n o fT o w n o fM i d d l e t o nM i d d l e t o nT o w n o f C r o s s P l a i n sT o w n o f C r o s s P l a i n s
T o w n o f B e r r yT o w n o f B e r r y T o w n o f S p r i n g f i e l dT o w n o f S p r i n g f i e l d
T o w n o f T o w n o f W e s t p o r tW e s t p o r t
T o w nT o w n o f o f
B u r k eB u r k e
T o w n o f R o x b u r yT o w n o f R o x b u r y
T o w n o f D a n eT o w n o f D a n eT o w n o f W i n d s o rT o w n o f W i n d s o r
T o w n o f B r i s t o lT o w n o f B r i s t o l T o w n o f Y o r kT o w n o f Y o r k
Lake Kegonsa
Lake Waubesa
Lake Monona
Lake Wingra
MudLake
Lake Mendota
BrazeeLake
§̈¦§̈¦
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
ÆÿÆÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ(/
Æ·
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æ·
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
ÆÿÆÿ
§̈¦
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æ·Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
ÆÿÆÿ
Æ·
Æÿ
Æÿ
ÆÿÆÿ
(/
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æ·
Æÿ
Æÿ
(/
Æÿ
(/
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
ÆÿÆÿ
ÆÿÆ·
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æ·
Æÿ
Æÿ Æÿ
ÆÿÆ·
Æ·
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æ·
Æÿ Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
(/
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æ·
Æÿ
ÆÿÆÿ
ÆÿÆÿ
Æÿ Æÿ
Æÿ
ÆÿÆÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æ·
Æ·
(/Æÿ
ÆÿÆÿ
ÆÿÆÿ
Æÿ
(/Æÿ
(/
Æ·
§̈¦
(/
(/ (/
(/
(/
Æÿ
Æÿ
(/
Æ·
Æ·
Æÿ
Æ· Æÿ
Æÿ(/
Æÿ
Æ·
Æ·
(/ §̈¦(/
(/
(/
(/
Æ·Æÿ
Æÿ
Æ·(/
Æÿ
(/ (/ (/
(/ (/
Æÿ
(/
(/
(/
(/ (/
Æ·
Æÿ
Æ·
§̈¦§̈¦
(/(/
Æÿ
Æÿ
(/
Æÿ
Æ·
Æÿ
(/
Æ·
Æ·
Æ·
(/ (/
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
§̈¦
Æ·
Æÿ
Æÿ
Æÿ
§̈¦
§̈¦
§̈¦
§̈¦
§̈¦
§̈¦
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P !P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
A
S
N
N
A
M
M
N
D
A
V V
P
M
Q
M
M
Q
Q
KK
K
P
P
K
P
M
S
P
S
P
G
G
G
G
A
MM
A
D
D
A
D
D
A
B
A
A
N
N
A
A
A
B
A
W
W
BB
N
B
N
W
N
T
T
N
T
T
N
C
C
I
39
39
39
39
39
94
MC
BB
MS
90
MM
KP
18
69
14
MM
73
CV
51
KP
KP
94
90
1812
51
BW
1412
1814
19
51
12
14
12 9051
19
MV
69
19
19
PD
18
1812
51
90
30
CV 51
12
19
KP
19
KP
14
ID
PD
PD
92
PB
69
PB
PB
PB
CC
14
MM
51
MM
51
73
AB
MN
AB
73
AB
BB
94
TT
TT
BB
BB
73
19
51
CV
TT
90
94
151
151
113
113
151
151
151
151
138
113
151
151
151
151
113
138
Hope
Nora
Burke
Utica
Paoli
Basco
Riley
Ashton
Albion
Kegonsa
Windsor
Montrose
Sunnyside
Marxville
Deansville
Mt. Vernon
Pine Bluff
Token Creek
York Center
Klevenville
Martinsville
Springfield Corners
Source Info:Pavement Condition: WISLR (WDOT, 2/10), City of Madison (9/10).Street Base: 2/10, Orthophoto Derived (MATPB/DCLIO).Functional Classifications: 4/10 (MATPB, WDOT).Hydrography: 12/00, 1:24,000 (WIDNR).Civil Division Limits: 2/10, Annexation Records (MATPB/DCLIO).MPO Boundary: 9/02 (MATPB).
©Lambert Conformal Conic Projection
WISRCS - Dane County, NAD 83(91)
Rev: 10/15/2010
City of Edgerton
Village of Mazomanie
Village ofBlue Mounds
Village ofMount Horeb
Village ofCross Plains
Village ofBlack Earth
Village ofBelleville
City of Verona
City of Madison
City of Middleton
Village of Waunakee
Village of Dane
Village of DeForest
City of MadisonVillage of
ShorewoodHills
Village ofMaple Bluff
City of Fitchburg
Village ofOregon
City of Stoughton
Village of Brooklyn
Village ofRockdale
Village of Cambridge
Village of Deerfield
Village of Marshall
City of Sun Prairie
Village ofCottage Grove
Village of McFarland
City of Monona
(/
Lake Mendota
Lake Monona
151
See Isthmus Inset
0 1.5 3
Miles
Isthmus
0 1,900 3,800
Feet
Dane County0 5 10
Miles
PASER = Pavement Surface Evaluation Rating System
Pavement Condition ofRegional Arterial and Collector
Roadways (2009)
MPO Boundary
Structural improvement (e.g., recycling pavement) or reconstruction required.
Routine maintenance (e.g., crack filling) and/or preservative treatment (seal coating or overlay) required.
Little or no maintenance required.PASER Rating of 8 -10
PASER Rating of 5 - 7
PASER Rating of 4 or Less
No Data Available
Transportation Planning Board
Madison Area
TTT P BP BT P BA Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)
Author: pldmsDate Saved: 1/5/2012 2:25:28 PMPath: U:\ArcMapPrj\Trans\Pavement\RTP\PavementRatings_2010_page.mxd
Figure 13
352035 Regional Transportation Plan Update March 2012
middle category. CTH K (CTH M to CTH Q), Monona Drive (Broadway to Pflaum), Femrite Drive (Marsh to I-39/90), Lake St.—all in the worst pavement condition category—were resurfaced or reconstructed in 2010 or 2011. Williamson St. was also just reconstructed. Other local roadways in the worst category with preservation work programmed include University Avenue (Allen Blvd. to Segoe), Monona Drive (Pflaum to Cottage Grove Rd.), Branch Street, CTH N (CTH BB to W. Oak St.), and W. Old Sauk Road in the Town of Middleton. McKee Rd./CTH PD (Maple Grove to CTH M) is scheduled for reconstruction in 2016.
Almost all state roadways are classified as arterials. The overall pavement condition
Miles Percent Miles Percent Miles Percent Miles PercentArterials - Total 11.3 5.8% 108.6 55.4% 76.2 38.9% 196.1 37.2% County 5.9 6.6% 63.8 71.0% 20.2 22.5% 89.9 17.1% Municipal 5.4 5.1% 44.8 42.2% 56.0 52.7% 106.2 20.2%Collectors - Total 25.4 7.7% 191.0 57.8% 114.1 34.5% 330.5 62.8% County 3.8 6.8% 43.5 78.4% 8.2 14.8% 55.5 10.5% Municipal 21.6 7.9% 147.5 53.6% 105.9 38.5% 275.0 52.2%System Total 36.7 7.0% 299.6 56.9% 190.3 36.1% 526.6 100.0%
Miles Percent Miles Percent Miles Percent Miles PercentInterstate 2.1 7.0% 13.2 44.0% 14.6 49.0% 29.9 18.6%U.S. Highways 1.2 1.5% 10.2 12.6% 69.3 85.9% 80.6 50.2%State Trunk Highways 2.1 6.9% 7.4 24.2% 21.1 69.0% 30.7 19.1%Connecting Highways 5.7 29.4% 3.8 19.3% 10.0 51.3% 19.5 12.1%System Total 11.1 6.9% 34.5 21.5% 115.0 71.6% 160.7 100.0%
Sources: Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation, Wisconsin Information System for Local Roads (WISLR) (2/10), and City of Madison Engineering
1 Excludes ramps.
Pavement Condition of State Roadway System1
Pavement Distress Index (PDI) RatingLess than 50 50 to 79 80 to 100 Total
Within the Madison Metropolitan Planning Area: 2009
Table 16Pavement Condition of Local Arterial and Collector Roadway System
PASER Rating4 or less 5 to 7 8 to 10 Total
Within the Madsion Metropolitan Planning Area: 2009
of state roadways is better than the local arterial/collector roadway system. About 72% of the state system is in the best pavement condition, 22% in the middle category, and 7% in the worst condition. Resurfacing of Interstate 94 east of CTH N and reconstruction of STH 113 in Madison, both in the worst category, were done in 2010-‘11. Interstate 39/90 south of Madison and USH 14 between Madison and Oregon were both resurfaced in 2011. The Interstate projects will substantially increase the percentage of that system in the best category. State roadways in the worst category with preservation work or complete reconstruction programmed include USH 151/East Washington Avenue
362035 Regional Transportation Plan Update March 2012
(Thierer to E. Springs), STH 19/Main St. in Waunakee, and USH 51 north of STH 19.
Overall, WisDOT and local agencies are doing an excellent job of maintaining the arterial and collector roadway system.
Bridge conditions
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has developed a system for rating the sufficiency of bridges, which indicates the bridge’s sufficiency to remain in service. A sufficiency rating below 80 qualifies structures for Federal Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program funding. WisDOT maintains records of bridge sufficiency data only for structures exceeding 20 feet in length. According to WisDOT, in 2010 a total of 76 bridge structures in Dane County had a sufficiency rating below 80 compared to 83 in 2005. See Table 17. The 76 bridge structures had an average length of 104 feet, and a combined length of 1.51 miles.
Two of these bridges are posted for maximum allowable loads: Hoepker Road bridge over I-39/90/94 in Madison; and the Dyreson Road bridge over the Yahara River located south of the Village of McFarland. The Hoepker Road bridge, which had the lowest structure rating at 22.5, is programmed for replacement and
Sufficiency Rating # of Bridges % of BridgesLess than 50.0 27 5.0%
50.0 - 79.9 49 9.0%80.00 - 100 467 86.0%
TOTAL 543 100.0%
Source: WisDOT
Sufficiency Ratings for Roadway Bridge Structuresin Dane County - 2010
Table 17
expansion in 2016. The Dyreson Road bridge is programmed for replacement in 2012. Of the other 74 bridges with a rating below 80, 14 of those structures are currently programmed for rehabilitation or, in most cases, bridge replacement. These include:
• I-39/90/94 (USH 51) • I-39/90 (Saunders Creek) • STH 19 (Token Creek) • Milwaukee Street (E. Branch Starkweather Creek) • CTH B (Yahara River) • CTH F (Ryan Creek) (Outer area) • CTH M (Chicago and North Western Railroad) • CTH P (Black Earth Creek) (Outer area) • CTH PB (Sugar River) • CTH V/North St. (Yahara River) (Outer area) • Lacy Road (Swan Creek) • Elder Lane (Maunesha River) (Outer area) • Fritz Road (Flynn Creek) (Outer area) • Russet Road (Maunesha River) (Outer area)
The Milwaukee Street bridge over Interstate 39/90 is currently scheduled for replacement in 2019. The Cuba Valley Road bridge over Interstate 39/90 is scheduled for a deck replacement in 2021.