the quantized free electron theory ++++++++ energy e spatial coordinate x nucleus with localized...
TRANSCRIPT
The Quantized Free Electron Theory
+ + + + + + + +
Ene
rgy
E
Spatial coordinate x
Nucleus withlocalized coreelectrons
Jellium model:
electrons shield potential to a large extent
Electron “sees” effective smeared potential
Electron in a box
In one dimension:
In three dimensions:
)r(E)r()r(V)r(m
2
2
where
otherwise
Lz,y,xfor.constV
)z,y,x(V
00
222222
22 zyx kkkmm
kE
where zzyyxx nL
k,nL
k,nL
k
2222
2
8zyx nnn
mL
hE
and ,...,,n,n,n zyx 321
zksinyksinxksinL
)r( zyx
/ 232
Fixed boundary conditions:
+ + + + + + + + x
0 L
)Lx()x( 00
+
+
+ +
+ +
+ +
Periodic boundary conditions:
)z,y,x()Lz,Ly,Lx(
rki/
eL
)r(23
1
zzyyxx nL
k,nL
k,nL
k
222
and ,...,,,n,n,n zyx 3210
kx
m
kx
2
22
Ldkx
2
“free electron parabola”
density of states
Remember the concept of
dE
# of statesin ]dEE,E[
41111
)k(E 1 )k(E 2 E
))k(EE( 1
1. approach use the technique already applied for phonon density of states
k
))k(EE()E(D~
E
EE
E
dE)E(D~1
1
k
EE
E
dE))k(EE(1
1
where )E(D~
V:)E(D1
Density of states per unit volume
3
3k
Vd k
2
1/ Volume occupied by a state in k-space
k
))k(EE()E(D~
kx
ky
kz
L
2
L
2
L
2
Volume( )
VL
3322
Free electron gas: m
k
m
kE
22
2222
Independent from and
dkkkd 23 4
Independent from and
mEk 21
dE
E
mdk
2
1
dEE
mmE))k(EE()E(D
~V
)E(D2
124
2
1123
Em
)E(D//
3
2321
2
2
2
1
2
Each k-state can be occupied with 2 electrons of spin up/down
Em
)E(D/ 23
22
2
2
1
k2 dk
2. approach calculate the volume in k-space enclosed by the spheres
.constm
k)k(E
2
22and .constdE)k(E
kx
ky
L
2
32
2
4
L/
dkkdk)k(D
~
# of states between spheres with k and k+dk :
dEE
mdk
2
1
22 2
mE
k
with )E(D~
V)E(D
12
2 spin states
Em
)E(D/ 23
22
2
2
1
E
D(E)
E’ E’+dE
D(E)dE =# of states in dE / Volume
Statistics of the electrons (fermions)
Fermions are indistinguishable particles which obey the Pauli exclusion principle
T=0
En=1
En=2
En=3
En=4
En=5
Let us distribute4 electrons spin
4 electrons spin
En=6 Occupationnumber 0for state
4 nEE
Occupation number 1 for states
Fn E:EE 4of a given spin
Ef(
E,T
=0)
Probability that a qm state is occupied
EF
1
x
Fermi Dirac distribution function at T>0
With accuracy sufficient for many estimations: f(E,T) linearized at EF
1
1
TBk
E
e
)T,E(f here chemical potential
FE
Fermi energy
More detailed approach to Fermi statistics
The grand canonical ensemble
Heat Reservoir RT=const.
Particle reservoir
System
n nn
U E
n nn
N N
1 nn
Average energy
Average particle #
Normalized probabilities
Now we consider independent particles i ii
E n
Total energy of N fermion system
occupation # ni=0,1 of single particle state i with energy i
i ii i
N n n where1 2
1 2( , ,...)
( , ,...)j jn n
n n n n
i ii
U E n
average occupation of state j is given by
( )
{ }
( )
{ }
i i
i
i i
i
n
jn
j n
n
n e
ne
Chemical potentialP,TV,TV,S N
G
N
F
N
U
For details see & additional info see
1 2( , ,...)n n
where the summation ...
jn means
1 2( , ,...)
...n n
( )
{ }
( )
{ }
i i
i
i i
i
n
jn
j n
n
n e
ne
1 1 2
1 2 3
1 1 2
1 2 3
, ,...
, ,...
i ii
i ii
nn
jn n n
nn
n n n
e n e
e e
1
0...
j j
j
j j
j
n
jn
n
n
n e
e
Repeat this step
( )
1( , )
1ij jn f Te
The Fermi gas at T=0
E
f(E
,T=
0)
EF
1
E
D(E)
EF0
0
dE)T,E(f)E(Dn
Electron density
#of states in [E,E+dE]/volume
Fermi energydepends on T
Probability that state is occupied
0
0
FE
dE)E(D dEEm FE/
0
0
23
22
2
2
1
3222
0 32
/
F nm
E T=0
00 5
3FEnU
0
00
FE
dE)E(DEUEnergy of the electron gas @ T=0: dEEEm FE/
0
0
23
22
2
2
1
25023
22 5
22
2
1 /
F
/
Em
2300
23
22 5
121 /
FF
/
EEm
3222
0 32
/
F nm
E
there is an average energy of 0
5
3FE per electron without thermal stimulation
with electron density 322 1
10cm
n we obtain KT@eVTkeVE BF 30040
11240
Click for a table of Fermi energies,
Fermi temperatures and Fermi velocities
Specific Heat of a Degenerate Electron Gas
here: strong deviation from classical value
only a few electrons in the vicinity of EF can be scattered by thermal energy into free states
Specific heat much smaller than expected from classical consideration
D(E)
Den
sity
of
occu
pied
sta
tes
EEF
energy of electron state
0
dE)T,E(f)E(DEU
#states in [E,E+dE]
probability of occupation,average occupation #
2kBT
Before we calculate U let us estimate:
These Tk)E(D
BF 222
1 # of electrons
increase energy from TkE BF to TkE BF TknE
TkTk)E(DU B
F
BBF 2
2Tk)E(DU BF Tk)E(DC BFel2 π2
3
subsequent more precise calculation
Calculation of Cel from
0
dE)T,E(f)E(DEU
0
dET
f)E(DE
T
UC
Vel
22
1
TBkFEE
TBkFEE
B
F
e
e
Tk
EE
T
f
0
dET
f)E(DEE F
0
0 dET
f)E(DE
T
nE FFTrick:
Significant contributions only in the vicinity of EF
)E(DTkC FBel2
2
3
3
2
0
dET
f)E(DEEC Fel
with Tk
EE:x
B
F and dxTkdE B
E
D(E
)
EF
)E(D)E(D F
0
dET
fEE)E(DC FFel
21
x
x
e
e
T
x
T
f
TBk/FEx
x
FBel dxe
ex)E(DTkC
2
22
1
decreases rapidly to zero for x
dx
e
ex)E(DTkC
x
x
FBel 2
22
1
)E(DTkC FBel2
2
3
F
/
F Em
)E(D23
22
2
2
1
with 322
20 3
2
/
F nm
E
and
F
BBel E
TkknC
2
2 in comparison with
Bclassical
el knC2
3
1 for relevant temperatures
W.H. Lien and N.E. Phillips, Phys. Rev. 133, A1370 (1964)
Heat capacity of a metal:
3ATTC
electronic contribution lattice contribution@ T<<ӨD
Selected phenomena which don’t require detailed knowledge of the band structure
Temperature dependence of the electrical resistance
T
residual
5T
T
Scattering of electrons: deviations from a perfect periodic potential
Impurities: temperature independent imperfection scattering phonon scattering
)T()T(phonresidual Matthiessen’s rule:
D
TBkD
d
eM
03
1
1
2
13
Simple approach to understand Tphon for T>>ӨD
Remember Drude expression:m
ne
2
11scattering rate
Fv
V
N1
#of scattering centers/volume
scattering cross section
scattering cross section
2u
tcosuu 0
D
d)(DuN
u0
22
3
1
02
2
1 uuFermi velocity of electrons: m/Ev FF 2
23
9
D
N
compare lecture notes:Thermal Properties of Crystal Lattices
D
D
dN
uN
0
23
20 9
2
1
3
1
202
2
1 uM)(E
1
1
2
1
TBke
Tu
211
D
TBkD
d
eM
u0
32
1
1
2
13
with
Tkx
B
and dx
Tkd B
T/D
xB
D
dxe
xTk
Mu
0
2
32
1
1
2
13
Let us consider the high temperature limit: T>>ӨD
T/D
xB
D
dxe
xTk
Mu
0
2
32
1
1
2
13
11
1
2
10
xxex
2
23
DB
T
kM
Note: T5 –low temperature dependence not described by this simple approach
Lindemann melting temperature TM: 2
22 3
D
M
BMT
T
kMu
22sm
MTrxu where
emperical value 10.average atomicspacing
Thermionic Emission
Finite barrier height of the potential
E
x
EF
Fvac EE: work function
Evac
Fx E
m
k
2
22
xx vnqj
Current density for homogeneous velocity
generalized k
xx )k(vV
qj
Current density for k-dependent velocity
3
3k
Vd k
2
Again:
kd)k(v
qj xx
332
Fx E
m
k
2
22Occupied and
minxk
xxzy ))T,k(E(fkdkdkdkm
q 32
2
Spin degeneracy
Since TkB
Fermi distribution approximated by Maxwell Boltzmann distribution
1
1
TBkFEE
e
)T,E(f approximatedTBkEFE
e)T,E(f
minxk
TBkFE
TBkmxk
xxTBkmzk
zTBkmyk
yx eekdkedkedkm
qj 2
22
2
22
2
22
32
2
TBkm
)zkykxk(
TBkFE
ee 2
2222
minxk
TBkFE
TBkmxk
xx eekdk 2
22
Let us investigate the integral
22
2
22
2
2
1
/)FE(m
TBkFE
TBkmxk
x ee)k(d TBkB eTmk
2
Fx E
m
k
2
22
TBkmzk
zedk 2
22
Remember integrals of the type:
dxeTkm xB 22
dxTkm
dk Bz
2
Tkm
kx
B
z
2
Tkm B
2
TBkBB
x eTkmTmk
m
qj
223
2
2
2
TBkBx e)Tk(
h
emj
23
4
Richardson-Dushman
Richardson Constant
TBkBx eT)r(k
h
emj
223
14
Typical value of Tungsten: eV.54
Nobel prize in 1928
"for his work on the thermionic phenomenon and
especially for the discovery of the law named after him".
Owen Willans Richardson
Universal constant: A=1.2 X 106 A/m2K
Reflection at the potential step
A (1-r)=0.72 X 106 A/m2 K
Vacuum tube
Field-Aided Emission
EF
Evac
E
x
Image potential
Electric field in x-direction
xEx)x(V
@ very high electric fields of m/V810 tunneling through thin barrier cold emission