the puzzle of denisovan anatomy

3
Denisovan Anatomy Alan R. Rogers November 29, 2021 1 / 16 The puzzle of Denisovan anatomy Fossils are identified as Denisovan by their DNA. The known Denisovan fossils are too fragmentary to tell us much about anatomy Is it possible to decipher anatomy from DNA? 2 / 16 The problem with GWAS One approach to this problem uses genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Variation in modern phenotypes is correlated with modern genetic variation to construct a polygenic score, which predicts phenotype from genotype. Works well in recent past but not in ancient past, because most recent variants are not very old. 3 / 16 Using methylation to predict phenotype Methyl groups are molecules that attach to DNA and inhibit transcription, which reduces the amount of protein produced. Gokhman et al (2019) developed a way to predict ancient phenotypes from methylation patterns. 4 / 16 How to distinguish methylated from unmethylated parts of ancient DNA All ancient DNA is damaged, to a greater or lesser extent. The type of damage differs between methylated and unmethylated parts of a chromosome. Gokhman et al estimated the methylation pattern from the damage pattern. 5 / 16 How to tell how methylation affects the phenotype Methylation reduces gene expression—the amount of protein produced by a gene. Other mutations may also reduce gene expression, and much is known about how gene expression affects phenotypes. Gokhman et al made a list of genes that are methylated differently in modern humans, Neanderthals, and Denisovans. Then they searched the literature for information about how expression of these genes affects phenotypes. 6 / 16

Upload: others

Post on 19-May-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The puzzle of Denisovan anatomy

Denisovan Anatomy

Alan R. Rogers

November 29, 2021

1 / 16

The puzzle of Denisovan anatomy

Fossils are identified as Denisovan by their DNA.

The known Denisovan fossils are too fragmentary to tell usmuch about anatomy

Is it possible to decipher anatomy from DNA?

2 / 16

The problem with GWAS

One approach to this problem uses genome-wide associationstudies (GWAS).

Variation in modern phenotypes is correlated with moderngenetic variation to construct a polygenic score, which predictsphenotype from genotype.

Works well in recent past but not in ancient past, becausemost recent variants are not very old.

3 / 16

Using methylation to predict phenotype

Methyl groups are molecules that attach to DNA and inhibittranscription, which reduces the amount of protein produced.

Gokhman et al (2019) developed a way to predict ancientphenotypes from methylation patterns.

4 / 16

How to distinguish methylated from unmethylated

parts of ancient DNA

All ancient DNA is damaged, to a greater or lesser extent.

The type of damage differs between methylated andunmethylated parts of a chromosome.

Gokhman et al estimated the methylation pattern from thedamage pattern.

5 / 16

How to tell how methylation affects the phenotype

Methylation reduces gene expression—the amount of proteinproduced by a gene.

Other mutations may also reduce gene expression, and much isknown about how gene expression affects phenotypes.

Gokhman et al made a list of genes that are methylateddifferently in modern humans, Neanderthals, and Denisovans.Then they searched the literature for information about howexpression of these genes affects phenotypes.

6 / 16

Page 2: The puzzle of Denisovan anatomy

An example: pelvic size

Methylation has increased in modern humans (MH) at theSOX9 gene ⇒ lower gene expression ⇒ smaller pelvis.

7 / 16

An example: pelvic size

Four other genes also imply a smaller pelvis in MH thanNeanderthals.

8 / 16

Testing the method against skull traits

Method was correct for 15 of 17 differences between skulls ofMH and Neanderthals.

9 / 16

Testing the method against other traits

Correct for 14 of 16 other skeletal traits.

10 / 16

Predicted Denisovan skull traits

Example: predicted biparietal width is wider in Denisovansthan in Neanderthals or MH.

11 / 16

Predicted Denisovan skull traits

Prediction: Denisovans had wider heads and flatter faces thanNeanderthals.

12 / 16

Page 3: The puzzle of Denisovan anatomy

Predicted Denisovan other traits

13 / 16

Xuchang skulls

100–130 kya, from China

Anatomy similar toNeanderthals, but it’s too far

east.

Right time and place forDenisovans, but we have no

DNA.

14 / 16

8 traits differed fromNeanderthals.

7 of the 8 were predicted todiffer, based on methylation

patterns in the Denisovangenome from Siberia.

For 4 of the traits, thedirection of the difference could

be predicted. All 4 differed inthe predicted direction.

15 / 16

Summary

I Methylation of DNA suppresses gene expression.

I Also affects postmortem changes in DNA, allowing us toestimate mythylation patterns in ancient DNA.

I Methylation patterns successfully predict knowndifferences between MH and Neanderthals.

I Predict that Denisovans had wider heads and flatter facesthan Neanderthals.

I Predicted Denisovan anatomy agrees remarkably with theXuchang skulls from China.

16 / 16