the power of prediction: building a better test-taker
TRANSCRIPT
2ExamSoft Assessment Conference | #ASSESS2015
Building A Better Test Taker
• Brad Marcum, Director, • Academic Data Services, KYCOM
• Meg Sidle, Director, Institutional Research • and Effectiveness, UPIKE
3ExamSoft Assessment Conference | #ASSESS2015
A Little Background
•Medical School Mission•Computer-based testing began in Fall 2012
•Provided immediate formative assessment results to improve student learning within individual courses
4ExamSoft Assessment Conference | #ASSESS2015
Unaddressed Issue
First-time pass rates of COMLEX Level 1 remained low
Since 2004, continued to examine relationships with admissions criteriaindividual course performance
Not making a difference
5ExamSoft Assessment Conference | #ASSESS2015
A Fresh Approach
• Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Self-Assessment Examination (COMSAE)
• Strong correlation (r = .80) between KYCOM student performance on this assessment and their actual COMLEX Level 1 scores
• Find predictors for performance on the COMSAE:Regression indicated that seven predictors
explained 57.2% of the variance (R2 =.59, F(7,177)=36.07, ρ<.01).
7ExamSoft Assessment Conference | #ASSESS2015
Summative Assessment
• See if data from the computer-based testing on the item content from the four courses in the model could prove useful
• Major issues with categories• Thirty-eight (38) specific topics from these
courses were significantly related to the students’ COMSAE scores. (ρ<.01) Not necessarily strong relationships
8ExamSoft Assessment Conference | #ASSESS2015
Where Do We Go From Here
• Faculty need to question why these particular topics were significant out of the more that 150 topics in the four courses
• Faculty should examine the range of topics and specific lessons that they taught in the respective courses on these topics
• Faculty development workshops how to write criteria