the perkins act performance measures for nontraditional cte -may 17, 2012 national coalition for...
TRANSCRIPT
The Perkins Act Performance Measures for Nontraditional
CTE-May 17, 2012
National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education National Coalition on Women, Jobs and Job Training
National Alliance for Partnerships in EquityNational Women’s Law Center
Wider Opportunities for Women Institute for Women’s Policy Research
Who is in the room? What is your role in CTE? What questions do you have?
Agenda
Overview of the Coalition and this Project Findings Considerations for Reauthorization A Discussion on the Blueprint, using an Equity Lens Resources
Project Recap
The Taskforce reviewed: State accountability data for enrollment and completion
in non-traditional CTE for 2007/08; 2008/09; 2009/10; Data for 2009/10 are presented here
Cluster/Concentrator Data for 2007/08; 2008/09; 2009/10; Data for 2009/10 are presented here
Non-traditional $$ Allocations (data not presented)
The Taskforce did not review CAR state reports.
Most States Meet Nontraditional Targets
Out of the 53 states/jurisdictions 47 states came within 90% of their targets under secondary
participation; 45 did so in secondary completion; 48 did so in post-secondary participation; and 47 did so in post-secondary completion.
Does this surprise you? Has that changed for your state in 2010-11?
Secondary participation
Secondary completion
Secondary CTE: Actual v. Target PerformanceParticipation
Completion
Secondary CTE Disaggregated by GenderParticipation
Completion
Postsecondary participation
Number of Students Participating in All Non-Traditional Programs
1,002,491, 46%1,167,753, 54%
Male StudentsParticipating
Female StudentsParticipating
Postsecondary completion
Number of Students in All Non-Traditional Programs
202,561, 43%
272,206, 57%
Male StudentsParticipating
Female StudentsParticipating
Post-Secondary CTE: Actual v. Target PerformanceParticipation
Completion
Post-Secondary CTE Disaggregated by GenderParticipation
Completion
Secondary Female Enrollment in U.S. by Career Cluster, 2009-2010
Post-Secondary Female Enrollment in U.S. by Career Cluster, 2009-2010
Source: Perkins IV Crosswalk Table 3: CIP-Nontrad-Cluster-Pathway
Career Cluster Total # CIP Codes # Non-trad CIP Codes % Non-trad for Females
Agri., Food & Natl. Resources
92 75 81.5%
Arch. & Construction 55 54 98.2%
Info. Tech. 25 17 68.0%
Manufacturing 66 46 69.7%
STEM 214 81 37.6%
Transp., Distrib. & Logistics
35 31 88.6%
High Performing States Demonstrate Potential for Women in Nontrad Programs
Architecture and Construction Cluster
in Post Secondary CTEFemale Female Total
Concentrators+ Enrollees
Maryland 23.3% 202 866
Florida 21.2% 418 1974
Missouri 19.7% 267 1358
Oklahoma 17.4% 126 727
U.S. 10.0%
Data Indicates Inconsistent Reporting Standards and Data Quality
Wisconsin and Florida report extremely unlikely rates of over 90% Secondary Nontraditional Completion.
Delaware reports that 95 percent of enrollees in the Post-Secondary “Transportation, Distribution and Logistics” cluster are female, yet the next ‘best’ state enrollment for women in this cluster, Maryland is only 15.2 percent women.
Inexplicably high year-to-year variation in some states. For example, South Carolina reported nearly 5,000 fewer completers between 08-09 and 09-10.
What about your data?
The Blueprint:Through an Equity Lens
What have we learned from Perkins IV about equity? What would we like to see measured in the next Perkins? How would we like to have it measured?
Reactions to the proposed equity measures
Resources
National Alliance for Partnerships in Equitynapequity.org Root Causes and StrategiesProfessional Development
Virtual Learning Community Professional Development
Program Improvement Process Micromessaging to Reach and Teach Every Student Professional Development Institute