the origin of the jurassic quiet zone - new insights from...
TRANSCRIPT
GP13A-1134
The Origin of the Jurassic Quiet Zone - New Insights from Hawaiian Jurassic Magnetic Anomalies Masako Tominaga ([email protected]) Michigan State University
Maurice A. TiveyWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution
William W. SagerUniversity of Houston
High quality seasurface marine magnetic anomaly data (blue lines) from the Hawaiian lineations along with a composite of the deep-towed TowCam magnetic profile (red line) show changes in anomaly shape and amplitude that are similar in to the Japanese lineations (top composite profile), suggesting that the anomalies record globally coherent geomagnetic field behavior for the Jurassic. The strong similarity of anomaly patterns between the Japanese and Hawaiian sequences from M19 to M38 supports the remarkably dynamic geomagnetic field behavior of fast reversals and changing intensity, confirming a proposed record of the GPTS sequence for M29 to M38. While the LAZ in the Hawaiian sequence is not as clear as in the Japanese lineations.
140148152156
M19M24M25 M23 M22 M21 M20
144Age (Ma)
Chron
161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170
−400
−300
−200
−100
0
100
200
300
100 nT
A
B
M21
M22M23
M24M25
Hole 801C
M38
Low Amplitude Zone
Japanese M-anomalies (2003, 1992, & V3214 profiles)
M42/41 M29 M27 M25 M24 M23 M22M19
V3214 (Nakanishi et al. 1989 interp.)2003 Deep-tow profileUpcon. to Surface. 1992 Deep-tow profile
Upcon. to Surface.
M27
M32/31
M33
M42
M32/31M43
M40M43M44
Hawaiian M-anomalies (2011 Sea Surface Magnetic Profiles)
M29
M28
M34M33
M41 M39
M38/37
sm
sm
160˚ 165˚ 170˚
20˚
25˚
Seasurface Magnetic ProfileTowCam (Mid-level) Magnetic ProfileSentry AUV (near-bottom) Magnetic ProfileReflection/Refraction Seismic Profiles
A B
C
Que
nste
dtoc
eras
lam
bert
i
Pelto
cera
s ath
leta
Erym
noce
ras c
oron
atum
Kosm
ocer
as ja
son
Siga
loce
ras c
allo
vien
se
Prop
lanu
lites
koe
nigi
Mac
roce
phal
ites h
erve
yi
Clyd
onic
eras
disc
usO
xyce
rites
orb
is
Que
nste
dtoc
eras
mar
iae
Callovian OxfordianBajocian
Proc
erite
s hod
soni
Mor
risic
eras
mor
risi
Tulit
es su
bcon
tract
us
Bathonian
Card
ioce
ras c
arda
tum
Peris
phin
ctes
plic
atili
s
Peris
phin
ctes
pum
ilus
Peris
phin
ctes
cau
tisni
grae
Ring
stea
dia
pseu
doco
rdat
a
Zigz
agic
eras
zigz
ag
Park
inso
nia
park
inso
ni
Gara
ntia
na g
aran
tiana
Stre
noce
ras n
iort
ense
Step
hano
cera
s hum
phrie
sianu
mSo
nnin
ia p
ropi
nqua
nsW
itche
llia
laev
iusc
ula
Hyp
erlio
cera
s disc
ites
Early Late
Steiner et al., 1987 Ogg et al., 2010 + Przybylski et al., 2010b
New Gipe and Ogg Study
M44
M43
M42
M41
M40
M39
M38
M37
M36
M35
M34
M33
M32
M31
M30
M29
M28
Proc
erite
s pro
grac
ilis
Early LateEarly Late Early LateMiddleMiddle Middle
? ? ??
??
The latest M37-M38 magnetostratigraphy (Rachel Gipe and James Ogg, Purdue Univ.)
Phoenix Lineation
Hawaiian Lineations
Phoenix Lineations
TN272 Survey Line
Marine magnetic anomalies recorded in oceanic crust, have played a central role in documenting Earth’s magnetic field history as compiled in the geomagnetic polarity timescale (GPTS). The oldest part of the marine record is the Jurassic Quiet Zone (JQZ) (preM29 chrons) which is known to be a period when field intensity was low, while reversal rate was high. The origin and character of the JQZ has been the subject of marine magnetic studies over past 20 years in the western Pacific where the oldest and arguably best preserved Jurassic magnetic anomalies create three Jurassic lineation sets (Japanese, Hawaiian, and Phoenix). The map below shows the three magnetic lineations sets converging on the Pacific Jurassic Quiet Zone region. The black and purple lines indicate the transit and survey lines respectively of the 2011 Hawaiian Near Bottom Magnetic Survey (Cruise TN-272).
Japanese Lineations
Background
The Japanese JQZ magnetic anomaly sequence was extensively investigated by an aeromagnetic and two deeptow magnetometer surveys in 1992 and 2003, revealing (i) the presence of lineated anomalies older than M29; (ii) a GPTS record extending from M29 to M44 with a tie to ODP Hole 801C and (iii) remarkably fast reversals that decrease in intensity back in time until M38. Prior to M38 there is a low amplitude zone (LAZ) in anomalies lasting until M42, when both anomaly amplitude and a lineated character reappears around Hole 801C.
Previous Work on Japanese Lineations
Map of 2011 Cruise (TN272) showing the survey track of sea surface magnetic profiles, the deep-towed (TowCam) magnetic profile and two short tracks of the AUV Sentry near bottom magnetic profiles.
New 2011 Hawaiian Lineation Data
New 2011 Hawaiian Magnetic Data
M42 M39M41M34M38/37
162 162.5 163 163.5 164 164.5 165 165.5 166 166.5
100 nT
C
MID-TOW 3.2 km Depth
SEA SURFACE LINE
Preliminary Timescale Modeling - Hawaiian Lineation Data Forward model of M-series anomalies using Larson and Hilde (1975) timescale. Note, reverse periods generate positive anomalies in the Pacific M-series.
SUMMARYNew 2011 sea surface magnetic data and a Mid-Tow magnetic profile of the Jurassic Hawaiian lineations are modelled and correlated with the magnetic sequence measured in the Japanese lineations. Preliminary modeling indicates that we have frequent and rapid reversals and a decrease in amplitude of anomalies from M29 through to M39. A low amplitude zone (LAZ) in the Japanese lineations does not appear to have the same appearance in the Hawaiian sequence. We do see a resumption of strong anomaly amplitude in the M42 to M44 sequence time period. Further modeling of the reversal sequences is underway and will help refine a revised version of the Jurassic Geomagnetic Polarity Time Scale.
Funding provided by a grant from the NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
801C
200 nT
1992 Data2002/03 Data
R-S
100 nT
801C Survey
M34Survey
**
*
*
M27
r
M30
r
M44r M43
r
M42r M41
r
M40
r
M39r M38r M37
r
M36
r
M35r
M34
r
M33r M31
r
M29
r
M28r
Synthetic Model
156170 160165 Age (Ma)
10 km
M32r
M42r M41r
Legend
M36 M34
LAZ
* * **
* Seamount
Deeptow Mid-DepthTominaga et al.2008
Deeptow Tominaga et al. 2008
Magnetostrat
M33
After Tivey et al., 2006, GPTS: Tominaga et al., 2008
Magnetization Value (A/m)−400
−200
0
200
400
Observed Sea Surface Magnetic Field
distance (200 Km)
−50
0
50
−400
−200
0
200
400
Observed MidTow Magnetic Field
Magnetization Value (A/m)
−50
0
50
Panel above shows a representative sea surface profile and the reversal model fit. Magnetization value shows the filtering effect of the seafloor spreading on the block model magnetization intensity. Panel to the left shows the Mid-Tow profile (3.2 km level) and the reversal model fit. These two models will be correlated to assess the primary magnetic chrons for eventual correlation to a magneto-stratigraphic record as shown below.
M44
M43
M42
M41
M40
M39
M38
M37
M36
M35
M34
M33
M32
M31
M30
M29
M28
Longitude East (Degrees)