the new service economy: innovation in services
DESCRIPTION
Lecture presented at Autonomous University of Madrid (UAM) March 2013.TRANSCRIPT
UAM, Madrid, March 2013
The New Service Economy – Innovation in services
Ian Miles
(University of Manchester, and HSE, Moscow)[email protected]
[email protected] Institute of Innovation Research
Laboratory for Economics of Innovation
Overview
Service Innovation, and Innovation in Services, is NOW (almost) mainstream
How Understanding of Services and Service Innovation has evolved
New Approaches to Service Innovation
Services and Technological Innovation
Interest in “Service Innovation”
Pub
licat
ions
with
the
ter
m in
the
ir tit
les
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
service innovation
new service development
innovation in services
Publish or Perish data www.harzing.comMarch 3rd 2013
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Interest in “Service Innovation”
Pub
licat
ions
with
the
ter
m in
the
ir tit
les
Publish or Perish data www.harzing.comMarch 3rd 2013
2010
2004
Service Industries – Innovation IN ServicesNACE Rev 1
•Hotels and Restaurants (HORECA)
G
•Transport, Storage
H
•Financial Intermediation (FI...
I
•Real estate, Renting (…RE), Business Activities
J
•Wholesale & Retail Trade; Repair of .Motor Vehicles, Motorcycles and Personal & Household Goods
K
•Public Administration and Defence; Compulsory Social Security
L
•Education
M
•Health and Social Work
N
•Other Community, Social and Personal Service Activities
O
Includes KIBS
Sections
Industries These are the service specialists
Perspectives on Service(s)Primary industries specialise in extracting
things (raw materials, etc.) from the natural world (and change and manage parts of that world).
Secondary industries specialise in making things (from other things): Manufacturing makes goods, Construction makes buildings, etc.
Tertiary industries specialise in doing things: Services (service industries) produce ... services (service products).
And services can be produced by other industries, and consumers.
InnovationGoods innovation – product and process – making new things, making things in new ways. (Largely technological innovation.)
Service innovation then: doing new things, doing things in new ways.
Whether in service industries (“innovation in services” or other service suppliers.
... or is it more complicated?Product and process entangled
User involvement in coproduction; role of service relationships; organisational innovation
What Do Services Do?
They effect transformationsphysical, chemical, biological, psychological, informational (etc.)
of EntitiesMaterial artefacts (goods, buildings, etc.)
Living entities (especially human beings)
Signals and Symbolsto achieve Effects
Maintenance, Movement, Matching...
Problem-solving (versus) Providing Experiences
Varieties of Service Transformation
Some human corporeal transformation is of low complexity – personal services like cosmetic and hairdressing (can be quasi-medical, though usually routine). Innovation in aesthetics, consumables.
Other transformations of people and artefacts are much more
physical – e.g. transport, HORECA, repair/ maintenance. Application of power machinery.
Informational –e.g. providing experiences, entertainment, education
Three Transformational Types
Physical Transformations
e.g Cleaning, Transport
Often much manual, sometimes low-skill work
Environmental sustainability, “self-
service”
Power and engine systems; technologies
under repair etc.
Business model change
Human Transformations
e.g. Health, Personal Services
High presence, often high involvement of Consumer/User
Human diversity, Interpersonal relations
Many specialised, from very low to very high-tech
Changing role of public sector
Informational Transformations
e.g Finance, Communications
Range of mass and customised services
Keeping apace of platforms and users, IP
IT and supporting systems (e.g. Batteries)
New functionality (e.g. Location) and knowledge
(e.g. Neuro...)
Manual Activity Knowledge-intensive activity
Examples
Features
Challenges
Technologies
Trends
Many activities, and most service industries, involve some mixture of all three
Not all service innovation is technological
Innovating service suppliers often use new technology, at least in a facilitating role
But even here there are exceptions: especially in personal servicesE.g. CBT (.5m treatments in UK in 2012)
Alternative to pharmaceuticals
NHS: “one of the most
effective treatments for
anxiety and depression.”
Can be via book or software
And now “web therapy”
But still usually face-to-face, Sometimes in groups
Situation
Altered Thinking
Emotional Feelings
Physical Sens-ations
Behaviour
Opportunities influenced by state of science and development of practical experience... Health services involve particularly complex and long-term sequences of problem-solving, involving many professions and bodies of knowledge in complex (public-private) institutional frames...Numerous specific innovations. See: D.Consoli et al, 2007, “The Process of Health Care Innovation” in J Costa-Font et al (eds) The Economics of New Health Technology Oxford University Press
Not all Technological Innovations in Services are IT-based
Many service processes are highly specific
The transformations can benefit from particular categories of technology.
For example, medical services may apply tools and knowledge concerning:
Pharmacology
Radiology
Surgery
Physiology
Genomics...
Information Technology is nevertheless pervasive
While there are many specific service technologies
Surgical tools, hairdryers, trains, trolleys, fast-food containers, clipboards....
Most services are information-intensive, in front and back offices
Thus most are IT-intensive
Barras: IT represents an industrial revolution for service sectors: IT investment is very heavy from them.
Information Technology evolution
Inspired by Marc Weiser et al: - cf: I Miles (2005) “Be Here Now”, INFO Vol. 7 No. 2, pp49-71
Mainframe mini
VANs
Experts
Centralised
Numbers
Micro PC
LANs
Profess-ionals
“End-User”
Text/ graphics
Networks & laptops
Web
Public
Content
Commun-ication
Tablet, smartphone
WiFi, 3G
Wide public
Web2.0,
P2P
Multimedia
Sensors, Actuators
WiMax, 4G,cloud
Ubiquit-ous
Internet of things,
locations
Control
Biodevice
+ + +
Ambient
Semantic web
Enhance-ment
Mainframe mini
VANs
Experts
Centralised
Numbers
Micro PC
LANs
Profess-ionals
“End-User”
Text/ graphics
Networks & laptops
Web
Public
Content
Commun-ication
Tablet, smartphone
WiFi, 3G,
Wide public
Web2.0,
P2P
Multimedia
Sensors, Actuators
WiMax, 4G,cloud
Ubiquit-ous
Internet of things,
locations
Control
Biodevice?
+ + +
Ambient
Semantic web
Enhance-ment
Information Society
One for Many
People
One for a Few
People
One for Each Person/Place
A Few for Each
Person/Place
Many for Each Person/Place
Mainframe mini
VANs
Experts
Centralised
Numbers
Micro PC
LANs
Profess-ionals
“End-User”
Text/ graphics
Networks & laptops
Web
Public
Content
Commun-ication
Tablet, smartphone
WiFi, 3G,
Wide public
Web2.0,
P2P
Multimedia
Sensors, Actuators
WiMax, 4G,cloud
Ubiquit-ous
Internet of things,
locations
Control
Biodevice?
+ + +
Ambient
Semantic web
Enhance-ment
Information Technology Use is one shaper of Service
Economy
One for Many
People
One for a Few
People
One for Each Person/Place
A Few for Each
Person/Place
Many for Each Person/PlaceEvolving Views of Service Economy (& Service Innovation)
Service Economy
1.0
Service Economy
2.0
Service Economy
3.0
Service Economy 1.0“Post-Industrial Society” - 1960s-’80s
1966-1970
1971-1975
1976-1980
1981-1985
1986-1990
1991-1995
1996-2000
2001-2005
2006-2010
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Service Economy
Post Industrial SocietyService Economy
1.0
Phrases in titles: Harzing’s Publish or Perish 3/1/2013
Service Economy 1.0“Post-Industrial Society” - 1960s-’80s
Economy of services sector(s)
Growth driven by consumer demand, welfare state provision, low productivity growth
Innovation relatively low, supplier-driven
Industries are pre- or post-industrial - too complicated or particularised for mass production
MoT thus seen as adoption of technology from elsewhere
Exceptional services sequestered
Examples: Bell, Fuchs,Touraine
Services, textiles and agriculture
high-tech firms in industries such as pharmaceuticals and electronics
large firms producing basic materials and consumer durables, e.g. automobile manufacture
specialized machinery production and high-tech instruments.
Supplier-dominated firms
Science-based firms
Scale-intensive firms
Specialised equipment producers
Sectoral Patterns of Innovation – traditional view
Original formulation of Pavitt (1984): four broad
types of innovation Sectors include:
Thus, diffusion is the issue: and maybe slow uptake is the “problem”
Innovation – overwhelmingly identified as technological.
Pavitt, K. (1984) ‘Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: towards a taxonomy and a theory’ Research Policy 13 (6) pp.
343-373
Manchester Institute of Innovation Research
Traditional view of service innovation
(with very few exceptions)
Service industries play little role in (technological)
innovationand can thus be ignored by innovation
policy
Increasingly hard to sustain this view as
technology-based services become
important to innovation in all
sectors
and as many more traditional service sectors displayed considerable technology adoption and innovation
Service Economy 2.0Knowledge-Based Economy: 1980s-2000s
Phrases in titles: Harzing’s Publish or Perish 3/1/2013
Service Economy
2.0
1966-1970
1971-1975
1976-1980
1981-1985
1986-1990
1991-1995
1996-2000
2001-2005
2006-2010
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Service Economy
Post Industrial So-ciety
Information Society
Knowledge Economy
Service Economy 2.0Knowledge-Based Economy: 1980s-2000s
New Information Technology widely adopted in service organisations- especially back-office in large organisations.
Many IT-related services assisting this - KIBS as supporting business processes and innovation across the economy.
New services and service delivery, new e-services.
Information Society, Knowledge Economy
Examples: Barras, Gershuny,
A similar (not identical) approach had already been developed in the 1990s by Gallouj – see recent work like F. Gallouj and F. Djellal (eds) (2010). The Handbook of Innovation and Services, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham
Framework developed by R Coombs & I Miles,
2000, “Innovation, Measurement and Services: the new
problematique” in J S Metcalfe & I Miles (eds)
Innovation Systems in the Service Economy Dordrecht: Kluwer
Perspectives on service innovation
Dis-missal
Demarc-ation
Syn-thesis
Assim-ilation
Dismissal
Different Disciplines Converge and Collide
Service Management:
stress coproduction
New Service Development:
stress intangibility
Innovation Studies:
stress information and
information technology
Management studies, esp. HORECA & trade
Marketing, esp. E-businessIndustrial economics, esp. High-tech, KIBS
Demarcation
Assimilation
Services are qualitatively distinctive, due to INTANGIBILTY and INTERACTIVITY : different forms of innovation and innovation process
Assimilation Perspective
Dis-missal
Demarc-ation
Syn-thesis
Assim-ilation
Dismissal
Service innovation is not distinctive; it
can be studied and organised in ways
familiar from analysis of.
manufacturing.
Services are qualitatively distinctive, especially due to INTANGIBILTY, INTERACTIVITY, etc. different forms of innovation & innovation process
Tend to focus on
technological innovation
(though some
theorists insist that
even technological innovation is distinctive)
Supplier-dominated firms
Science-based firms
Scale-intensive firms
Specialised equipment producers
Patterns of Innovation rethought: varieties of service
firm as innovator
Many traditional service sectors – personal and retail trade services, many public services
Production-intensive scale-intensive sectors: large organisations with much back-office innovation (incl some supermarkets, etc.)
Network sectors – physical networks (e.g. transport, wholesale), information networks (e.g. telecomms, banking)
Specialised technology suppliers and science-based sectors – computer & engineering services
(1989 and 2000) – mainly tech focus
Soete, L. and Miozzo, M. (2001). “Internationalization of Services: A Technological Perspective”
Technological Forecasting and Social Change 67, 159–185
From Pavitt to Soete & Miozzo
Services in Innovation SurveysInnovation surveys (originally the CIS) across Europe since 1980s, have included many service industries since the 1990s. Recent UK data featured below..
Share of “innovation active” firms – those engaged in any of: 1. Introduction of a new or significantly improved product (good or service) or process; 2. innovation projects not yet complete or abandoned; 3. New & significantly improved forms of organisation, business structures or practices & marketing concepts or strategies; 4. Activities in areas such as internal R&D, training, acquisition of external knowledge or machinery & equipment linked to innovation activities .
Demarcation Perspective
Dis-missal
Demarc-ation
Syn-thesis
Assimilat-ion
Dismissal
Services are qualitatively distinctive, COPRODUCTION, INTANGIBILTY, INTERACTIVITY, etc. different forms of innovation & innovation process
Service innovation is not distinctive; it
can be studied and organised in
ways familiar from analysis of
manufacturingExtensive discussion of
service specificities
(and the huge diversity across
services) in marketing
and management
as well as innovation
studies
Manufacturing vs Services -1
Factory
Goods
Goods Consumer
Service Producer
Services
Service Consumer
versus
Separation Closeness, Coproduction
Manufacturing vs Services Innovation 1
Factory
Goods
Goods Consumer
Service Producer
Services
Service Consumer
versus
Separation Closeness, Coproduction
Process Innovation
Product Innovation
Process andProduct Intertwined: Ideas of (e.g.) Delivery Innovation, Servuction Innovation
Back Office
Consumer Communities
Back Office
Manufacturing vs Services – 2
Factory
Goods
Goods Consumer,Use
of Goods
Front Office
Services
Service Consumer: action and transformation
versus
But not all service
process is immediately in
the coproduction
front-office space – much
back office invisible
preparation and support
Not all manufactur-ing processes are in tangible production: much back-office work here too.
Back Office
Consumer Communities
Back Office
Manufacturing vs Services - Innovation 2
Factory
Goods
Goods Consumer,Use
of Goods
Front Office
Services
Service Consumer: action and transformation
versus
Barras: Reverse Product
Cycle model: IT introduced
for efficiency in back office, then
applied to improved
quality and eventually
new services in front office
Service Economy 3.0 Economy of Service(s) 2010s-
Service Economy
3.0
Service orientation (Service-Dominant Logic) to forefront
“Service Science”, SSME
Product-service systems – and responses to Grand Challenges
Not just technology – but emergent processes and practices will be invigorated by use of new technologies like sensors, data analytics, etc.
Examples: Gallouj, Spohrer, Vargo/Lusch
Dismissal
A Synthesis?
Dis-missal
Demarc-ation
Synthesis
Assim-ilation
All sectors have diverse features, and many “service” elements
Exploration of Service Innovation has identified aspects of innovation that are generically important
Innovation analysis – and measurement and policy – needs to account for all of these aspects (or if not, to explain why some sorts of innovation are privileged)
Dismissal
Aspects of a Synthesis
Dis-missal
Demarc-ation
Synthesis
Assim-ilation
All sectors have diverse features, and many “service” elements
Manufacturing features:
(KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE) SERVICE
ACTIVITIES AS INNOVATION AGENTS
Services feature:
Exploration of Service Innovation has identified aspects of innovation that are generically important
Innovation analysis – and measurement and policy – needs to account for all of these aspects (or if not, to explain why some sorts of innovation are privileged)
“SERVITISATION”
SERVICE DOMINANT
LOGIC
TERTIARISATION GREATER TECHNOLOGY-
INTENSITY
INDUSTRIALISATION
“PRODUCTISATION”
ENCAPSULATION
Back Office
Consumer Communities
Back Office
Innovation - Manufacturing and Services 1
Factory
Goods
Goods Consumer,Use
of Goods
Front Office
Services
Service Consumer: action and transformation
versus
Back Office
Consumer Communities
Back Office
Innovation - Manufacturing and Services 1
Factory
Goods
Goods Consumer,Use
of Goods
Front Office
Services
Service Consumer: action and transformation
versus
Back office innovation – similar trajectories of IT use,
organisational innovation
Process innovation – similar features of automation, etc., but much variety across sectors in terms of
specific processes and transformations
Tertiarisation, convergence
Back Office
Consumer Communities
Back Office
Innovation - Manufacturing and Services 2
Factory
Goods
Goods Consumer,Use
of Goods
Front Office
Services
Service Consumer: action and transformation
Back office innovation – similar trajectories of IT use,
organisational innovation
Process innovation – similar features of automation, etc., but much variety across sectors in terms of
specific processes and transformations
Tertiarisation, convergence
Product innovation – new / improved goods – and services
Relationship and Delivery innovation
Product innovation – new / improved services (often for new goods platforms)
Innovation in marketing and e-business, e-commerce, aftersales, use of functionality
provided by good or service
Consumer Communities
Back Office
Loci of Service Innovation
Front Office
Services
Service Consumer
• Revenue Models
Ele
men
ts o
f B
usin
ess
Mod
el
• Position in Value Chain
• Management of suppliers
• Office systems
• Service work organisation, scripts
• Service Value Proposition (Concept and Content)
• Service Delivery Systems
• Interface with, relation to, consumers and their platforms
• Role of consumers (and communities) in coproduction
• Target Markets and Marketing Techniques
Value Chain
Consumer Communities
Back Office
Skills for Service Innovation
Front Office
Services
Service Consumer
• Revenue Models
Ele
men
ts o
f B
usin
ess
Mod
el
• Position in Value Chain
• Management of suppliers
• Office systems
• Service work organisation, scripts
• Service Value Proposition (Concept and Content)
• Service Delivery Systems
• Interface with, relation to consumers and their platforms
• Role of consumers (and communities) in coproduction
• Target Markets and Marketing Techniques
Value ChainS
peci
fic t
echn
olog
y m
anag
emen
t &
gr
asp
of n
ew
opp
ortu
nitie
s
Gra
sp o
f fin
anci
al
man
agem
ent &
new
mod
els
Grasp of KM & informatics
Service design capabilities
Service technology capabilities
Grasp of users, uses
Service design capabilities
Service design capabilities
Grasp of business environment, scope for merger, acquisition, joint ventures, collaboration, open innovation
Grasp of markets, trends, marketing
Grasp of HR, team management
Aw
areness o
f com
petitors and
esp. D
isruptive po
ssibilities
The Synthesis Approach needs to recognise
Many diverse forms and dimensions of innovation
Varying in frequency and intensity across different types of organisation.
Often these occur and are managed relatively independently, even within the organisation
Though some changes trigger others
Some are interconnected from the start
Business model innovation may involve alignment of many innovations
Existing classifications and categories of innovation styles and activities – even R&D – may be of limited use. Study new design approaches.
Challenges for Innovation Management
Even servicisation has often proved challenging
Requirements for wide range of new knowledge, especially about user behaviour and wider contexts
Needs to combine different types of knowledge
Numerous sites of innovation, turbulence for innovation management
Wicked problems in Grand Challenges
Cognitive alignment
ConclusionsOften service innovation requires diverse knowledge types, and ability to combine multiple component offerings from multiple actors. New tools for service design are emerging.Many parties play role in development of capabilities for service innovation, including policymakers, HEIs, leading companies, professional bodiesImportant to retain and enhance scope for individual and organisational learning, as requirements for multiple competences evolveCentral role for management capability to identify, mobilise, coordinate requisite professionals and skill setsSMEs may need specific supportGrand challenges and complex problems – transformational innovations spanning social and technological innovation (e.g. AAL, sustainability)
End of Presentation