the new alliance for food security and nutrition: pushing the frontier of enlightened

7/28/2019 The New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition: Pushing the Frontier of Enlightened

1/35

Economic Policy PaPEr SEriES 2013

ThE nEw alliancE for food SEcuriTy and nuTriTion

PuShing ThE fronTiEr of EnlighTEnEd caPiTaliSm

JonaThan m. whiTE


2/35

2013 Te German Marshall Fund o the United States. All rights reserved.

No part o this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any orm or by any means without permission in writing

rom the German Marshall Fund o the United States (GMF). Please direct inquiries to:

Te German Marshall Fund o the United States

1744 R Street, NW

Washington, DC 20009

1 202 683 2650

F 1 202 265 1662

E [email protected]

Tis publication can be downloaded or ree at www.gmus.org/publications.

gmf Ppe Sees

Te GMF Paper Series presents research on a variety o transatlantic topics by sta, ellows, and partners o the German

Marshall Fund o the United States. Te views expressed here are those o the author and do not necessarily represent the

views o GMF. Comments rom readers are welcome; reply to the mailing address above or by e-mail to [email protected].

abt gmf

Te German Marshall Fund o the United States (GMF) strengthens transatlantic cooperation on regional, national, andglobal challenges and opportunities in the spirit o the Marshall Plan. GMF does this by supporting individuals and institu-

tions working in the transatlantic sphere, by convening leaders and members o the policy and business communities,

by contributing research and analysis on transatlantic topics, and by providing exchange opportunities to oster renewed

commitment to the transatlantic relationship. In addition, GMF supports a number o initiatives to strengthen democra-

cies. Founded in 1972 as a non-partisan, non-prot organization through a gi rom Germany as a permanent memorial to

Marshall Plan assistance, GMF maintains a strong presence on both sides o the Atlantic. In addition to its headquarters in

Washington, DC, GMF has ofces in Berlin, Paris, Brussels, Belgrade, Ankara, Bucharest, Warsaw, and unis. GMF also has

smaller representations in Bratislava, urin, and Stockholm.

abt gmfs E P P

Te Economic Policy Program is an initiative o GMF dedicated to promoting cooperation between the United States and

Europe on domestic and international economic policies as vital instruments o global prosperity, especially or the poor

and those aected by shis in the global economy. Te United States and Europe account or more than 40 percent o world

economic activity, close to $20 trillion in goods and services on an annual basis. Given the size and importance o this

relationship, GMFs Economic Policy Program seeks to ensure that the benets o globalization are distributed equitablyand airly. Trough in-depth research, targeted grantmaking, strategic convening, and outreach to key policymakers and the

media, the program supports transatlantic leadership at the critical nexus o economic policy, trade, development assistance,

and management o domestic sectors such as agriculture.

On the cover: Market in Yaounde, Cameroon in 2011. Jose Antonio Santiso Fernndez
mailto:info%40gmfus.org?subject=http://www.gmfus.org/publicationshttp://www.gmfus.org/http://www.gmfus.org/http://www.gmfus.org/publicationsmailto:info%40gmfus.org?subject=


3/35

The New Alliance for Food Security andNutrition

Pushing the Frontier of Enlightened Capitalism

Economic Policy Paper Series

April 2013

B J M. W

J M. W T G M F U S W, DC.

Exv S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

A Mv B P C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

T N A C O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

T N A Pb-Pv P . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


4/35

The New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition 1

Executive Summary

A M G8 S CDv, b N

A F S N.

T A k 5

v b ,

v v, G8 v

b

A. D , U.S. P

Ob 45

$ b

A . T j

b b v

b v .

A A x

, A

, b

.

T j N A.

F,

v v;

S, b bv

v

;

T, b-v

(PPP), v

v v

x v

.

B b-v k

N A b

v vz v v.

T x N A

k b b-

v v A

. T

b N A v .

S ,

b

b v k

b A

Cv A A Dv

P (CAADP). C k SABM,

N, W-M b j b A-

b x

vbA k. T

b

v v.

A v b

b k v . T

b A k b

, .

B v v

x v. Rz

v , N A v - k

v, v , b

v

.

T k N A

PPP v

v. T N A

v b v ,

v v, v

CAADP v . I k

b vv

b-v z

k

, . W v $ b

v b

- ,


5/35

The German Marshall Fund of the United States2

N A .

T A

v b PPP, v

b z

. T

b A

-v v v

v v v v

. S v

N A

kv .Hv, N A, PPP

v

b ,

, b .

T N A

kv

b z

v.

N, PPP

N A b

k b

v . B

P M Sv, N A

v v

v b -

k b. T v

b CAADP v

N A b v .

P b x . T

v

x

N A. A

k -v v . T

b v

v . F

, v b

Bk F R S N P,

x, k b

b -v b .

S k b N

A .

PPP k v

k

v. T v vv

b z

k . T k

v v

. Ev M, E, Tz v

PPP

k , ,

b- . B v

,

b.

B x, PPP b

v

v . I

S A G C

Tz (SAGCOT),

vv v v, v

, - , .

Nv,

PPP b

, , v. F ,

b

SAGCOT v v

v x

b v

. T PPP

. I -b , ,

b

v b

k,

v v

b v

New Alliance countries

suffer from a variety of

onstraints in exercising

leadership that will

mpact the outcomes of

the agreement.


6/35


Enlightened capita

could unleash

transformational

partnerships that h

cascading benefits

strengthening the

economy, society,and governance m

widely.

, k. I k

- -

, N A PPP v

.

S

b v

. Hv, b

b PPP ,

, x ,

. PPP b b

N A . Tk b b

v j ,

xb b . D

v b A,

v v

v v.

G8, A, v, b

v v v

PPP

v N A. R

v b

. S, N A

-v, CAADP-

J S Rv , v b

L C G8 S

v. N

A C Fk

v v. T

, v,

b b

b v k

v , v, , v

v-x

v b.

A k T Ex

G F S A, G

M F- v, v . T

k , v

k. T v

k v

v , , /

b q, v- ,

, k,

. T b v

b-v

. A

Ex G b v v

, k,

b v

.

T v b

, b v

b - .

B v

, N A

b v -

v. I b

v CAADP

x b ,

v v

x .

E

v

b , ,

v . I ,

PPP j. I x

v

G C, K R T, J M.W, Mk A, Transformational Partnerships:Innovative Approaches to Addressing Food Security in Africa(W DC: GMF) A
http://www.gmfus.org/archives/transformational-partnerships-innovative-approaches-to-addressing-food-security-in-africa/http://www.gmfus.org/archives/transformational-partnerships-innovative-approaches-to-addressing-food-security-in-africa/http://www.gmfus.org/archives/transformational-partnerships-innovative-approaches-to-addressing-food-security-in-africa/http://www.gmfus.org/archives/transformational-partnerships-innovative-approaches-to-addressing-food-security-in-africa/


7/35


A. I (z, , ),

,

, b v, ,

v , ,

b, bv . I

z, , vk, , , , ,

vb, v

k A b k

v k

.


8/35


Enabling Country Ownership

N A v

(.. CAADP )

b

.

R v b

N A

, ,

k , k b

, ,

( PM Sv).

L v k k N

A ,

v

, q z

V G Rb

Gv T L, F,

F Cx N F

S P Rb

A Iv.

A PPP v z

vv b b

v , N A PPP

v.

N A v

,

, , , x, k

b

v

v-b

, k,

.

N P Rb A Iv- .

Enabling Transformational Partnerships

N A k

v A

, k v

.

Ev v b v

N A PPP

v b

b

v.

L v b-

N A

PPP v

v v ,

b-v, v

, k

b.

G b

-

v b v b PPP

, kb b

q x

v , k

.

A v PPP b

v ,

, , ,

(..

v)

v

(.. ,

,

k).

D v

, ,

v, , NGO, ,

Recommendations

1

Lessons from value

chain and benefit-

sharing models sho

guide New Alliance

as they show evide

of generating posit

development outcoallow for practical

problem-solving,

and create positive

synergies among

partners, stakehold

and beneficiaries.


9/35


v v .

A b

, z

x ,

j vv

x.

Enabling Accountable Reforms

N A

, k

b b k v, , z -

b v

.

O N A

q b v x

, -, b

v b

v v

b b .

T N A b,

b b - ,

CAADP- J S Rv

G8 L C, k

v , v,

, v

v-x

v b.

T N A -v b-

L C , b

v NGO

v b

b b v N

A .


10/35


Seven of the ten

worlds fastest-grow

economies are exp

to be in Africa betw

2011 and 2015.

S , A v b v

v b b,

b , v ,

.

T U S, E,

v v b b

W Bk I M

F kk- v.

A

j . I ,

,

, v v

.

S, A b

v

q. T

b

. S

A v . O

j q b .

A b v

- ,

. A k

A

b , v, , k

, , v.

S , v, j ,

b, v

N v W,African Economies and the Politics ofPermanent Crisis 1979-1999 (N Yk: Cb UvP)

v, k bk .4

P 98-9 v b

b : bz , k

b, v,

v . Sv

b 8-,

A b b

x. B 99 999,

b-S

A b 7 , b

9 j b 58 .5 F

v (FDI) j $6.8

b zb $7 b .6

A, v -

x b A

b 5.7

T b v

v . I b-S

A, - b

48 b 8. I

,

v b HIV

v b 74 . A

, x b

b.8 W

, b

A v

A v .9

4 X D, J T, S B, SF, Strategies and Priorities for African Agriculture (WDC: I F P R I)

5 A Dv I, W Bk,

6 UNCTAD

7 The Economist I M F. T E, Mzbq, Tz, C,G, Zb, N.

8 The Economist, M -8, .9 Sv R, Emerging Africa: How 17 Countries are Leadingthe Way(W DC: C Gb Dv)

Africa Moves Beyond Permanent Crisis

2


11/35


Africas Emerging Middle Class will be a

Market Driver

A , A . B ,

A v

7 4 ,

6 . A

$68 8

$. A

j. T

b b . SABM,

- b k,

v $.5 b v x v

b v b .

A Dv Bk,Middle of the Pyramid: Dynamicsof the Middle Class in Africa, Mk B A , . Africa in 50 Years Time: The Road Toward Inclusive Growth(T, T: A Dv Bk) Sb .A A , v. F A.

Iv b N,

, x $ b

. T 9 A x b . W-M

q S A-b M H

$.4 b

k . A

v. T b FDI j

A b

k- -A FDI

N, S A, K

x .

T -k

b A .T v

v xv

, bk,

E & Y,Africa Attractiveness Survey

Figure 1. FDI as a Share of GDP for African oil exporters and oil importers1

Africa Economic Outlook 2012. S UNCTAD; WIR, IMF WEO

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

%G

DP

Oil Exporting (%)

Oil Importing (%)


12/35


- .

S , - v v FDI

GDP -x A (

F ).4 W j b

v ,

. T E A Sb

Cb S A

bb v,

v. Mb k

, , v,

v b

x b v. A

, b - , k

, v,

v .

Policy Commitments Set the Stage for

Agriculture Transformation

A

v. Gv v v

v b b

b , ,

q b.5 Sv

v z

b b b b

b - . I

v- v,

k Ebk, A v

, v . I b

b ,

,4 b A, M E,

E. A W-M b

, Ebk v A

k. W v bk v,

The Africa Competitiveness Report 2011, W EF, W Bk A Dv Bk,4 Africa Economic Outlook 2012. S UNCTAD; WIR, IMFWEO 5 Doing Business 2012, W Bk

,, v.

I , A b N

P A Dv (NEPAD),

v v

x

b . NEPAD z

v

bk . I ,

A Cv A

A Dv P (CAADP)

NEPAD. CAADP k , , A

-b . U , A

v

b 6

b . I,

A k

b b b

.6

E v A,

b v b . T k b

v k

A .7 M

b.

T v

(GDP) v

.8 T

bk A v

k v.

F , , z b

v. T

, , v vz

6

W v v b -b b NEPAD v, b .7 A Dv Bk,African Economic & FinancialBrief, Mk B, V , I 9, Fb7 M , 8 World Development Report: Agriculture for Development(W DC: W Bk) 7

With less than 20

percent of the cont

having access to

banking services, t

offers a tremendou

opportunity to

accelerate employmempowerment, and

development.


13/35


b N A FS N.

I N A k vb

A,

. T

A . T N A k k

A b

- v (.. CAADP v ) b

b-v PPP.

T x vb

PPP x

N A.


14/35


The New Alliance

and Country Ownership3

By consulting more

broadly with other p

of the government,

business, and civil

society, including th

media, developmen

policies and resourwill help reinforce l

accountability and

undermine it.

Ov , b

v b v. T

b IMF

W Bk v

v b

v j

(.. b j)

j.9 D b,

v, v

v v k

. T

b b .

I 5, P D A Ev

v v

k ,

. U ,

b

x v v

v

. Dv

, z

- , ,

b, , v, v . D

x .

I 8,

A b k

v . Dv

k

. T

b

x b xv b v.I , k xv

xv

9 High Impact Adjustment Lending (HIAL): Initial Evaluation,O Ev D, N. 9797 (W- DC: W Bk) 999

P D A Ev, 5

k . B b v,

b, v , ,

v

b .

A ,

v b

-

. G b

b. T

b .

T U.S. v b v . I

b b Rb D

. U P G W. B,

M C C (MCC)

.

T MCC b v

. A MCC,

x ,

z, v k

MCC v,

MCC- , bb k b

k v .

U P Bk Ob,

b U.S.

Q D Dv Rv

P P Dv Gb

Dv. T U.S. A I

Dv (USAID)

U.S. F F Iv

.

T v S T. L,MCC Principles into Practice: Country Owner-ship (W DC: MCC) Nvb

T U.S. F F Iv v v v v , , v .


15/35


When global leaders

launched the New

Alliance for Food

ecurity and Nutrition at

the 2012 Camp David

G8 Summit, country

ownership remaineda key element of this

ffort and expanded the

partnership to actively

include the private

sector.

v v

v v

v z

A U N

P A Dv, ,

v CAADP, -

v b. F

F, b , U.S. v

v b -

A .

I , USAID b v j

. K

P G,

v U.S. v

b

-v. I k

b v

z v . USAID

b

v

USAID F. I A , USAID

v q b

(.. b

PFM ). T v

USAID v

k PFM

,

v b

v U

j vb

v . I b b

USAID -v

v z, USAID ,

Feed the Future Progress Report: Boosting Harvests, FightingPoverty(W DC: USAID) Ob

v v bjv.4

Ov , b

v v,

b NGO.5

Alliance Partners Seek to Operationalize

Ownership

I 9, G8 LAq F S Iv

(AFSI) v $ b

R P.6

I b

v b

v. W b N A F S N

C Dv G8 S,

k

x v

v .

S N A

v

v , v , ,

v . T v

b N A b

v , ,

CAADP v . T

v

b v v,

v , b

4 ADS C U Rb P C S D M I A CI D: 8/6/

5 USAID F P R

6 T R P ) v -; ) , , b v; ) v v, -k k vb - b , , v ; 4) ; 5) b b v .


16/35


But, country owner

also means these

countries exercisin

leadership over

their development

policies and strateg

and coordinatingdevelopment action

, , .

B , N A

E, G Tz

v v N A C

Fk, b v

v,

, b. O UN

G Ab Sb , N

A , , v

b Bk

F, C Iv, Mzbq v v N A C

Fk.

E x N A C

Fk G8 v

, CAADP :

E: T A S P

Iv Fk (PIF)

Tz: T A F S

Iv P (TAFSIP)

G: T M-T A S

Iv P (METASIP)

Bk F: T R S N

P (PNSR)

C Iv: T N A

Iv P (PNIA)

Mzbq: T P N

Iv S A (PNISA)

A , P D A

Ev,

x . D b

k N A

b

. B, x v

v

v . T N

A C Fk

b

v k

v. T N

A x

v

k A

v

.

T , ,

v b

, ,

,

. N A

v , ,

k k k v

. T k b

b v b b ,

v b v,

v k

.7 Mv, v

b

N A k MNC

kv.

New Alliance Countries Face Pitfalls

on the Path to Ownership

B, N A

? T OECD Sv M

P D

7 G C, K R T, J M.W, Mk A, Transformational Partnerships:Innovative Approaches to Addressing Food Security in Africa(W DC: GMF) A


17/35


The role of the media

in providing critical

analysis on national

strategies and policies

has been scarce.

v k . T Sv

N A

A b x

v v

v v

.

Ov,

v v b 5

, b

. Hv,

. S, Sv v

v .

I x

v v

k -

x k

b.8 T b

v :

A v - v

(.. k)

A v

W- b (..

k b )

Gb,

9

75 . B , 5

v

A B

v v . Hv, N A

A B . M

v ( F ).

8 Aid Effectiveness 2005-10: Progress in Implementing the ParisDeclaration, OECD,

Figure 2. The Survey on Monitoring the Paris

Declaration: Do countries have operational

development strategies? 29

Country 2005 2007 2010

E C B B

Tz B B A

G C B B

Bk F C B C

C Iv N/A N/A N/A

Mzbq C C B

A v N A v E, Tz,

G, Bk F, Mzbq

M Dv G

. T v ,

v ,

v v .

Hv, Bk F

b q b

v . D k

, ,

,

k . I

v k v q

v .

T

k b b z.

I E, G, Mzbq, Tz,

. T

b x

k. T

v v

v

, b,

. T x

9 Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration , OECD,


18/35


In two New Alliance

countries, the

compensation to

households affecte

these land investm

has been determin

be inadequate thnot sufficient to res

their livelihoods.

.

Hv, v N A

v

b v

. E v

v b E.

W , v , v

vv

G, b

v . I Mzbq,

v , v

v . S v

bv

. T

x v

b v .

T N A

P Sv v

v v , ,

v

v . Hv, k

. P

b -v v b

b

. T v

b

. W

q,

v b

v .

Land Represents the Weakest Link

in OwnershipA P Sv v

N A v

, x. T

Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration , OECD,

Ib.

v N A. F ,

, A b

v

k

bk . P N A

k

.

Ev b Bk

F R S N P (PNSR),

k b b

, , -v

b, , . Mzbq

vb

b , b P

Sv.

T N A x

b

. A , ,

NGO b

b v A

vb z z.

T v b x b

k. R

v

v v k A. A

b - v ,

S K D L

C .

z M. C

v q .8

D Rb C

.

B S I G Ix (OECD), N A k 5 Mzbq (9) Tz (47). T k C Iv (6), E (64), Bk F (7) 86 v .


19/35


PPPs could potentially

serve as catalytic

vehicles for food

security but also for

improved governance

nd country ownership,

if well-structured.

A , ,

, x b

k. I N

A , v

v vv k

b v / v

.4 I

N A ,

b v

b b q

v.5 T

NA , q

b v b

v v q

b

v .6

U, k

v x

. O ,

, v

x , k

A. B , A,

,

( b ). N A

x b.

F , Tz E v -

. B

v. Sv

j , v

Tz. L k k

K G, Our Land, Our Lives Time out on the global landrush (U K: Ox GB) Ob

4 P B. M, Kj Hvvk, Ak B,Biofuels, Land Grabs, and Food Security in Africa (N Yk/L: Z Bk) 5 Lz C, Sj V, Rb L JK, Land Grabs or Development Opportunity? AgricultureInvestment and international land deals in Africa (L/R:IIED, FAO, IFAD) 9

6 Ib.

k

v

.

T v

v b

N A. U

C Fk,

k

V G Rb

Gv T L, F,

F Cx N F S P Rb A

Iv.7 T

k k

v

.

Mv, N A

v v

. O

-

.

T k b

v , b

b-

v , ,

v . T

b-v b

( b). PPP

v v b

v v ,

-.

Reporting and Accountability Must ResolveOwnership Pitfalls

A N A

? I , b

v b N A

7 S N A C Fk


20/35


b v b . T q

, , k

, k b

, , .

N A C Fk q

k

,

, v v

, ,

j v.

A x N A v

vv. C Iv

R L A b v

b J 5. I

Mzbq, v v

v

x b

b J . Bk F b

k b z

b,

( , , .), CNSS

v v

v

b Db . E

k v b b

, -

,

b Db .

R, , b b b b N A

. S N A

. F , N

G A P Sv (GAPS)

z b

v k . N A

b

,

, , ,

, x, k .

W , b b v-b ,

k, k

.

T b k b

L C C Dv

G8 S. I G8

A U . T -

CAADP- J S Rv ,

CAADP v

, x v , G8

, v b N A. R

b v

b qb ,

q, k

. Hv, b b,

b k N

A .


21/35


Over the past decade,

FDI to New Alliance

untries has risen from

$980 million to nearly

$7 billion, which has

een primarily driven by

anzania, Mozambique,and Ghana.

D G8 S M ,P Ob 45

$ b A ,

j b

v b

v. A U N G Ab

Sb , USAID A D.

Rjv S v-

, A ,

$5

A A.

T U.S. v b

v v 97. I

97, U.S. v Ov

Pv Iv C (OPIC),

k jb b

b. I v v

, , k ,

v q v

v v

. U P R 98,

v

v v . A C W

989, USAID b

C E Sv U v

-z (SME).

T E F b b

b C, ,

v

v

.8

T b-v

b v

v . I 97,

8 C L, Kk N, M Lb, TJ, Foreign Aid and Private Sector Development(W- DC: W ) 6

v . T bz v

, v x

v (ODA) v

. S 99, .

B , ODA $4 b, b

b ,

$4 b, v,

$777 b. (S F . T

v v b

.)

A , , A

b b

v v

N A A. A

v ,

FDI b-S A $6.8

b zb $7 b . I

b b-S A

v FDI v

b 5 . T

b v

z k, , jb. T ,

v FDI

v . Ov , FDI

N A $98

$7 b, b

v b Tz, Mzbq, G (

F 4).9

N A

. ODA $.6 $6.7 b

x .4 A

G, ODA x FDI N A ( F 5). E

9 U v GFDI . W A FDI v , .

4 OECD

The New Alliance and

Public-Private Partnerships4


22/35


v

v 8 C

Iv b b . D

FDI v

, N A

b ,

, ,

.4

New Alliance PPPs Offer the Promise of

Enlightened Capitalism

Pb-v v b

v x . PPP

b k W

Bk bk,

4 OECD

EU , -

j. T j

z PPP. S

PPP x . Ov ,

vv v b

b k b

PPP.

F , USAID

Gb Dv A (GDA),

b PPP. U GDA, PPP U.S. v k

v , b

( -k) v

bjv v

Figure 3. Private sector ows (FDI and remittances) and ofcial development assistance (ODA) to the

developing world 1991-2011 (billions)1

UNCTAD, W Bk, OECD

$-

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Official Development Assistance Remittances Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)


23/35


b.4 T k

U.S. v

v . T vv GDA

vv : v

v USAID

j k v

b k . GDA

b v b,

, , v,

, , -

-- -v .

I USAID F P R ,

v

b-v

4 M L L, Foreign Assistance: Public-PrivatePartnerships (W DC: C R Sv)J ,

b b FY5. I

GDA, x

Dv C A (DCA)

. T DCA b S

T G W, DC,

v

v v

v. A v,

v b

F Iv O F Sv

O x bk

PPP . T b

v ,

, ,

.

Figure 4. New Alliance FDI inows 2000-2011 (billions)1

UNCTAD

$-

$1

$2

$3

$4

$5

$6

$7

$8

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Ghana

Mozambique

Tanzania

Cte d'Ivoire

Ethiopia

Burkina Faso


24/35


B GDA , D. Rjv S

k U.S.

v

b b

k v

v v b.4 O

, v

v

v v. O ,

z v

v b .

B b S R B

b k k v j b

b k v. H

4 D. Rjv S, Eb E C ,USAID Pb-Pv P F, W, DC,Ob ,

G,

S F, jb A

- -z b v.

T ;

. T x v

b. T . E

v b. W .44

T b v b

k. E

v N A F S

N. T v

b v ,

. C

44 The Economist, S R B k - , Nvb 6,

Figure 5. ODA and FDI to New Alliance Countries in 2010 (billions)1

OECD UNCTAD

$-

$0.5

$1.0

$1.5

$2.0

$2.5

$3.0

ODA

FDI


25/35


A v , . S v

b

xv

.45 T q

v - ,

b .46 T v

b b

x b v

v. Hv, N A k

b ,

b b.

The Anatomy of PPPs is Based on

a Clear Division of Labor

T v PPP q

b. T k

v v

. C b

x b ,

, , , x,

k, v,

z k

. FDI PPP v v

v bk k

, ,

,

b , ,

.47 A , v

x v x

, ,

, , v,


46 J M, E A Aq K, DoesForeign Direct Investment Crowd-Out Domestic Private Invest-ment in Sub-Saharan Africa?, A F J , v., , 7-5; J H. D,MultinationalEnterprises and the Global Economy(Wk, E:A-W) 9947 T M, Harnessing Foreign Direct Investment forDevelopment: Policies for Developed and Developing Countries,(W DC: C Gb Dv) 6

b v v. D v

b

(..

- ).

PPP b v

v b b

b. F x, M D

Dv A GDA- PPP. T

bjv b

, k ,

- k bk v b.48 T

k v

, v

,

k . USAID b

v, ,

. L OLk v

x

b. M v b

. G M

, k

v . T v M

k v ,

k b x .

A M D Dv

A, k bk

v

v. I

,4

b 4 , v

x 4, b. TA b vk

. F v

v v v b


FDI and PPPs can have

a positive impact on

development through

backward linkages to

local suppliers, the

transfer of technology,

and interchangeof managers and

technicians, thereby

increasing incomes,

learning, and product

standards.


26/35


Under these benefi

sharing models,

smallholder farmer

in the vicinity of lar

scale farms gain ac

to inputs (e.g. fertil

extension services,value-added faciliti

and markets.

, b .49

T E C Iv b-v

k b

v v -q Ab

, b . T

v

v v . T G

F TSv

j

v . E-b NbI Bk S.C. (NIB) I

F C (IFC)

x.

USAID b. Sbk

P C E

. T

E M A

v v,

b, x

.5

T IFC v k-

$ NIB,

v v k

TSv. TSv b

v b

v q b . B

, 6 v 45,

v k NIB. T

v x

, v v 4

bv v -q,

. Cv v

49 L O Lk I Dv b5 G C, K R T, J M.W, Mk A, Transformational Partnerships:Innovative Approaches to Addressing Food Security in Africa(W DC: GMF) A

$.5 , NIB 8 .5

Tanzania Makes a Deep Effort

to Combine PPPs and Ownership

T S A G C

Tz (SAGCOT)

v . A

- z ,

k b v v

x . SAGCOT k

b

b - . U b- ,

v -

(.. z), x v, v-

, k. I b

v

b ,

, b,

k- v. I b

v j

, ,

bk -v

v q k b.

USAID, U.K. D I

Dv, N Eb

Tz v x

SAGCOT , v

v -

vb b. Y I v

z D S.

I Sb , USAID, U.K. D

I Dv, E

U

v

Kb , SAGCOT

v. USAID, W Bk,

5 TSv b


27/35


S, G M, D, M, A G Rv (AGRA), N

M Bk (NMB), N, SABM,

S Bk .

T b

v b v

v SAGCOT .5

SAGCOT b b-v

v

v v

-v

v. I J, P Jk Kk

SAGCOT Iv B W

E F Dv. T v

Tz v SAGCOT

Tz A P, Y, Uv,

P, W E F. A

b

v vv SAGCOT /

A C

Tz, Tz A P,

C Tz I, Tz S G A.5

A ,

x v v

v

.54 I Tz, N A

A F S Iv P

TAFSIP. Tz

5 S SAGCOT Iv Mx ://../

/-/5 T Tz N B C(TNBC). T TNBC b v v v -v. I v -, - K Kz A F 9.

54 P D A Ev, 5

TAFSIP I-MC C (ICC). T ICC

v v

, k k,

TAFSIP bjv v.55 T Cb

M,

, v v b

TAFSIP b v. T

ICC v

-, v , . A

v SAGCOT

ICC, Cb .

O SAGCOT

SAGCOT C L.

Hv Ob , C

b xv ,

b , v

SAGCOT k. T CEO

C Dv Dv

Tz M A, F S,

Cv. T b Tz

v, , x,

b . T C b . I

v

v k b . I

b b

b v

v

.56

Benefit-Sharing Models Demonstrate

Impact and Reveal Failures

T x b-

v, b,

Tz,

55 Tanzania Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan, Ob 8, 56 B Jk,Modernizing the Southern Agricultural GrowthCorridor of Tanzania: A Case Study(Cb, MA: HvK S Gv)

There are examples

of the benefit-sharing

model of including

government, business,

and farmers in

Tanzania, which helped

to set the stage ofSAGCOT.
http://www.sagcot.com/resources/downloads-resources/http://www.sagcot.com/resources/downloads-resources/http://www.sagcot.com/resources/downloads-resources/http://www.sagcot.com/resources/downloads-resources/


28/35


Contract farming ca

bring smallholder

farmers into the for

economy and unde

the right conditions

has resulted in inco

security, higher retand a number of ot

benefits for them.

SAGCOT. W bz,

vz .

T k

b . T

v v

v

v v v

v v . T

v,

b . T

v v z

5-, k (.. bk)

. T v

v .57

T Tz R P (TARIPA)

SAGCOT vv

v Tz, b ,

W Bk, USAID, N, J

I C A, FAO v . A b

- ,

x , , -

. I v

b , v- v,

v .58

Kb P L (KPL)

b 8 b A

M C

Iv G, A A C,57 T Iv S, - PvA S S , CRDB Bk M- Sv C, v .58 G C, K R T, J M.W, Mk A, Transformational Partnerships:Innovative Approaches to Addressing Food Security in Africa(W DC: GMF) A

NORFUND. T $5 v , ,

, q,

,

. W 5,49

v,

v- b 9 , b ,844

. USAID

.59

C b

, ,

, , , b b .6

F , v v q

- Tz,

. T

z b , ,

- , .

K T, NGO b b U,

b

M D v b ,

, v b. T

M H Q F

P L. T , k

,

.6 T b

bk

US$,

US$5 . C

F A Oz (FAO),

, ,

. T b

x v b v.

59 SAGCOT Iv P P O Iv R S, Fb 8, .

6 D Sv, Abb Bx, B V, U - v v - v?I I Ev Dv/Sb F Lb,

6 ://-.b./
http://www.gmfus.org/archives/transformational-partnerships-innovative-approaches-to-addressing-food-security-in-africa/http://www.gmfus.org/archives/transformational-partnerships-innovative-approaches-to-addressing-food-security-in-africa/http://masasi-farmers.webs.com/http://masasi-farmers.webs.com/http://www.gmfus.org/archives/transformational-partnerships-innovative-approaches-to-addressing-food-security-in-africa/http://www.gmfus.org/archives/transformational-partnerships-innovative-approaches-to-addressing-food-security-in-africa/


29/35


T v b x OLAM I,

b

. T

v -

k.

A k T

Ex G F S A,

G M F- v,

, v

. T k

v

k. T v

v v ,

, /b q, v-

, , k,

b . T

v b-v.

A Ex G

b v

, k, b

v

.6

A k b GMF

Ex G L A.

S

j vv

x. T

. F , NGO

Tz


. Hv, v x,

v , q

v , -

v . T

,

k .

A ,

x z,

v

. T v

v k. Tx

j b

.

Ownership Gaps Pose a Threat to PPPs

T M , E , SAGCOT

b

k v

b v

v . T

. I ,

vb b k

N A PPP.

Hv, N

A PPP. F , v -

PPP M E

x -

v

, , . B, v

PPP k v

v v k (..

).6

6 T Ex G W, DC,B, D S -

If a country has weak

country ownership

where national

acroeconomic policies

run counter to sector-

specific agriculture

ans, then New AlliancePPPs will have difficulty

scaling up.


30/35


Given the level of

specificity of the

policy reforms and

investments outline

in the frameworks,

these transaction-

oriented discussioncould potentially sp

a number of leadin

PPPs in New Allianc

countries.

B , SAGCOT -v b- v vz

v v . SAGCOT

PPP v ,

b b

v. I b b

. SAGCOT b v

- .64 L

b .

T

v x

b v .

O PPP v b

.

U N A,

PPP b

, v

P M Sv. I

-b , ,

b

v b

k,

v v b v

, k. I k

-

, N A PPP v

.

T q b

b v . T b

v b . Lk x

k ,

v,

64 B Jk,Modernizing the Southern Agricultural GrowthCorridor of Tanzania: A Case Study(Cb, MA: HvK S Gv)

, v q.65

Hv, x v

, v

, , ,

. F k

v

b

. I

.66 B ,

N A

b v

. G b

-v b v b PPP .

O kb b q x

v , k

. PPP b

b

, b

.

Building Trust Between Public

and Private Sectors will be Critical

A N A PPP k

b b

v . Gv v v

b v ,

, , ,

, v b

(.. ), b

x v,

. T v

CAADP v b 6

b j

65 D Sv, Abb Bx, B V, Under what condi-tions are value chains effective tools for pro-poor development?(I I Ev Dv/Sb F Lb)

66 Ib.


31/35


. Hv, v b

v v,

v v v

.67

B , N

A , v A

67 T Ex G W, DC,B, D S -

bv v

v b

v b vv

v v .68 T

v v

68 M Nv Dv S, Private SectorPerspectives for Strengthening Agribusiness Value Chains in

Africa: Case Studies from Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya and Mali(W DC: P C H A) M

Figure 6. Mutual Accountability under the New Alliance


32/35


33/35


-b b b v . N A

b

b, Tz H

A, INTERCOTON (

C Iv), U C

Ev Rz B ( 46

v b Bk F). E

v

v v

b v

b .


34/35


Conclusion

5

T b v

. I G8,

G, U N, A U .

F b

. I v -/-

b v,

k- v

- -

.7 T

k v b

N A .

C b-v

N A

. Y

b N

A. T

A v b PPP, v

b z

. T

b A

-v v v

v v v v

.


Africa will likely see

further gains as the

continents emergi

middle class drives

new dynamism, wh

if linked to New Alli

efforts, could magndevelopment outco

Hv PPP N A v

b ,

, b .

I, A

v

b .

A k

v ,

, k N A ,

v .

Pb-v (PPP) vv

b

z k .7 A

PPP A

v b

k v

. A N A k

v ,

v

v A.

7 D. Rjv S, Eb E C ,USAID Pb-Pv P F, W, DC,Ob ,


35/35

Off i c e s

Washington Berlin Paris BrusselsBelgrade Ankara Bucharest Warsaw

the new alliance for food security and nutrition: pushing the frontier of enlightened

Documents