the mechanisms of healing of asphalt pavement by dingxin cheng for dr. lytton’s micromechanics...
TRANSCRIPT
The Mechanisms of Healing of Asphalt Pavement
By DingXin Cheng
For Dr. Lytton’s
Micromechanics Class
November 11, 2002
2
Outline
• Surface Free Energy Concept
• Fatigue and Healing Analysis
• Mechanical Testing Results
• Healing Mechanisms
7
Fatigue and Healing Model -(1)
• Fatigue model without rest period
nvJAdN
dc][ 0
)(,,,,,, 1 tWEmDfnA Rff
Where,
8
Fatigue and Healing Model -(2)
• Fatigue model considering the healing effect
dN
dhJA
dN
dc nv ][ 0
hThhhf ,,,
dN
dh2
.
1
.
10
R2 = 0.7797
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1.5 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.5
Short Term Healing Rate
LW
Com
pone
ntShort-Term Healing Rate vs.
Non-Polar Component
11
R2 = 0.7445
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
Long-Term Healing Rate
Aci
d-B
ase
Com
pone
ntLong-Term Healing Rate vs
Polar Component
12
Summary of Effect of Surface Free Energy on Fracture Fatigue Healing
• Healing potential is promoted with
• Reduced LW
• Increased AB
LW and Healing Potential
0.005.00
10.0015.0020.00
Lif
shit
z-va
n d
er W
aals
com
po
nen
ts,
erg
s/cm
2
15
Testing Results and Healing Analysis- Aging Effect
0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
surf
ace
free
ene
rgy,
er
gs/c
m2
LW
AB
16
Asphalt Binder Fatigue Testing including Healing Effects
0
20
40
60
80
AAD-1 AAM-1 HCR
Asphalt Binder
Ave
rag
e p
erce
nt,
%
HPI (Healing Potential Index)
FLI (Fatigue Life Increase)
17
DMA Fatigue Data for AAM-1
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
No. of loading cycles
No
rmal
ized
G*
without RP
with RP
Nf
18
DMA Data Fatigue for AAD-1
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
0 5000 10000 15000 20000
No. of loading cycles
No
rmal
ized
G*
with RP
without RP
Nf
19
Asphalt Mixture Healing Testing -by Si, et al.
0102030
405060
Different Mix Type
Ex
ten
sio
n In
de
x, %
20
Result Comparison Table
Healing Potential Level
AAD-1 AAM-1 HCR
Surface Energy
Low Median High
Binder Fatigue Test
Low Median High
Mixture Fatigue Test
Low Median High
27
Potential Energy of Acid-Base Interaction Versus Inter-particle Distances
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
0 1 2 3 4
Distance, r
Po
ten
tial
En
erg
y, U
U-attraction
U-repulsion
U-Acid-Base
Umin
r0
28
Lifshitz-van der Waals Components
• London Dispersion Force
• Debye Induction Force
• Keesom Orientation Force
621
r
RUdispersion
621
r
QU indi
6
22
21 )(
r
PNU didi
30
Potential Energy of Lifshitz-van der Waals Interaction Versus Inter-particle Distances
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
Distance, r
Po
ten
tia
l En
erg
y, U
U-attraction
U-repulsion
U-LW
31
Comparison of AB and LW Potential Energy
Changing with Inter-particle Distances
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
distance, r
Po
ten
tia
l en
erg
y, U
U - Lifshitz-van derWaalsU - Acid-Base