the lattice gross-neven model and the langevin algorithm
TRANSCRIPT
Nuclear Physics B (Proc. Suppl.) 4 (1988) 595-599 595 North-Holland, Amsterdam
THE LATTICE GROSS-NEVEU MODEL AND THE LANGEVIN ALGORITHM
N. ATTIG*, R. LACAZE +, A. MOREL + , B. PETERSSON* and M. WOLFF*
* Fakul t~t fur Physik, Un ivers i t~ t B i e l e f e l d , D-4800 B i e l e f e l d i , F.R. Germany + Service de Physique Th#orique, CEN-Saclay, F-91191 Gi f -sur -Yvet te Cedex, France
The ana ly t i c so lu t ion o f the Gross-Neveu model on the l a t t i c e is given inc lud ing order 1/N. I t is compared wi th a high s t a t i s t i c s numerical s imulat ion using the Langevin a lgor i thm.
1. INTRODUCTION L =
The mot ivat ions for studying the Gross-Neveu
model on the l a t t i c e is both the i n t e res t in the
model per se, and the use of i t as a tes t ing
ground fo r numerical algor i thms wi th fermions on
the l a t t i c e . I t is a n o n - t r i v i a l model wi th fe r -
mions, having a d iscrete ch i ra l invar iance spon-
taneously broken for large enough number of f l a -
vours of fermi ons nf.
The model is asympto t ica l ly f ree and a n a l y t i -
ca l l y so lvable fo r large n f 1'2. For nf = ~ i t 3-5
has a f i n i t e temperature phase t r a n s i t i o n
Of course, the model also has p a r t i c u l a r fea-
tures not d i r e c t l y connected to theor ies l i ke
QCD: i t is constrained to two dimensions and
contains no gauge f i e l d s .
E a r l i e r works on the l a t t i c e aspects of the
model are l i s t e d in Refs. 6-9. The present in - 1 -
ves t iga t ion is the f i r s t to extend the ana ly t i c T c = ~ a exp(y E) ,
1 /nf expansion to the l a t t i c e regu la r i za t i on .
Furthermore, we have performed a numerical simu,
l a t i on wi th much higher s t a t i s t i c s than previous
i nves t i ga t i ons , which makes i t possible to e s t i - m~ = o ,
mate up to ( i / n f ) 2 e f fec ts . We have used the
f i r s t order Langevin a lgor i thm. In fac t , one of
the major goals of the i nves t i ga t i on is to study
the dependence o f the resu l ts o f th is a lgor i thm
on the d iscrete time step.
2. THE ANALYTIC SOLUTION
In the continuum vers ion, the Lagrangian o f
the model is
nf g2 nf
(z=l c~=l ( i )
where the ~a are n , two-component spinors. A l . n f f , - rCt ~ • •
sca lar f i e l d o(x) conjugate to ~2-1= ~ ~ Is in -
troduced I and a f t e r the formal i n teg ra t i on over
the fermion f i e l ds one obtains
o(x) 2 Sef f = nf { S - - ~ - - d2x + Tr I n ( 3 + o ( x ) ) ] , (2)
where ~ = g2 nf and the p a r t i t i o n funct ion is
Z = f [d o (x ) ] exp [ -Sef f ] (3)
I f the theory is regu lar ized e.g. by a spher ical
momentum c u t - o f f A, one can make a saddle po in t
expansion of Z, g iv ing to leading order
< o > ~ o = A e -T~/~ ( 4 )
and the c r i t i c a l temperature
(5)
where YE = .5772 is the Euler constant. A semi- 2 c lass ica l analysis gives the mass spectrum
m n = n~ s in(n~/2nf ) / (nl~J2nf) ,
m k = 2nf o / T~ , (6)
wehre m k is the k ink -an t i k ink mass.
A l a t t i c e version of the model wi th Susskind
fermions was f i r s t introduced in Ref. 6 and fu r -
ther studied in Ref. 7. The act ion is def ined to be
S = N { s ~ - ~ a + s Xx QxY x"}s ' (7) x x,y (x
0920-5632/88/$03.50 © Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland Physics Publishing Division)
596 N. Attig et al. / The lattice Gross-Neveu model
- - 0 . where ×x and < are two independent N-component
Grassmann var iables per s i t e . The matr ix is
Qxy = ½ [6x,y+l + 6x,y-1] +
+ ½(- l)X1[6x,y+~ - 6x,y_~] +
+ ~ 6xy [Ox+Ox_~+Ox_~+Ox_~_~] , (8)
where x = ( x l , x2 ) and y are two points on the
two-d i~ns iona l l a t t i c e and I and 2 uni t vectors
in the resp. d i rec t ions .
As was discussed in Refs. 6, 7 in t h e l / n f e x -
pansion the continuum l i m i t of the model is the
Gross-Neveu model with
nf = 2N (9)
Note that our I = g2N = ~ / 2 . On an i n f i n i t e sym-
metric l a t t i c e , the saddle point equation is
I 1 d2p (10) l - ~ f sin2p 1+sin2p 2+~-2 ,
where ~ is a constant. The in tegra l can in fact
be performed exact ly to give
1 1 (½, ~; 1; 1 X = v~2(~2+2) F ~2(~2+2)) (11)
The strong coupling l i m i t (o large) gives
= v~ (12)
and for weak coupling
o ~ Oas = 2 ~ e -Tt/2/ (13)
containing the expected factor 2 in the exponent,
and giving also the lat t ice scale. In Figure 1
we show the exact solution (11) compared with
the results from strong coupling (12) and weak
coupling (13). In Figure 2 we show °/°as" One
sees a strong "crossover" effect followed by a
slow approach to asymptotic scaling.
We have also calculated the I/N corrections
to 5, by developing in the fluctuations around
the saddle point. The calculation is rather
lengthy and w i l l be reported in Ref. 10. We get
on an in f in i te lat t ice
G
N = ~
5 0 ~
20 ng coupling 1.0 "%_,. I° * o ~
° °l°%m e • O5
0 2
I I I 0 0 5 1 0 1S
1/A
FI GURE 1
a/Gas
1.(
0 c. I I 0 5 1
I 0 5
N = ~
I 2 I 10
I/G i 15
1/.l
FIGURE 2
I d2P 9~'(P) [ ~ + ~.(p) ] - ' (14) < o > = ~ - ~T S W E F --Ca--
where
: ( l + c o s p , ) (1+cosp2) _~ T2-~-~ - x
2 k k ~2 _ )~ sin -~ sin (-2 ~--pot )
(~= 1 x 2 k 2 k (15)
( S sin2~2~+~2 ) ( 7, sin 2 ~=1 ~=1 ( T - Pa) +°2)
For comparison with the Lanqevin data we have
N. Attig et al. / The lattice Gross-Neoeu model 597
performed the in teg ra l s (or sums on a f i n i t e
l a t t i c e ) numer ica l ly .
3. THE NUMERICAL SIMULATION
To simulate the e f f e c t i v e act ion
Sef f = N ( ~ g ~ - Tr logQ) (16) X
we used the f i r s t order Langevin a lgor i thm with
an ext ra noise for the fermion par t
o T Q-l 3Q ~n ) Ox(n+ 1) = Ox(n ) - e N(-~-- ½ 5n ' ~
+ ~ q n ' (17)
where
<~n ~n' > = <qn qn' > = 26nn' (18)
The a lgor i thm is chosen to be as s im i l a r as pos-
s ib le to the Langevin algori thms fo r QCD, be-
cause one of the main object ives was to tes t
th is a lgor i thm and the E-dependence of physical
quan t i t i es . We have therefore not used features
special to two dimensions.
The numerical s imula t ion consists of runs at
N = 6, 12, 24 and 60 wi th .08 < 1/X < 2, with
l a t t i c e s of s ize 20x20 and 40x40 , and fo r f i -
n i te temperatures also 6x60 . The data were ta-
ken fo r various values of the time step ~, with
150,000- 300,000 sweeps fo r each po in t . The ma-
t r i x invers ion ~ = Q-I~ was done by the conju-
gate gradient a lgor i thm, We demanded that the
to ta l absolute value o f the rest vector
IIQ ~ - El i < .01 (19)
Errors were c a r e f u l l y monitored by the binning
method, so that co r re la t i ons in Langevin time
were taken in to account.
In Figure 3 we show < o > for N = 60 and for
two values of X as a funct ion of the time step
e. At ~ = 0 we have also p lo t ted the values com-
ing from the ana ly t i c expression on the l a t t i c e
to order I /N. The agreement wi th the ex t rapo la -
t ion of the numerical data is qu i te good. In the
strong coupl ing region the approach to c = 0 is
G
1 761 N =60
A=4 O
• e
02'
0 26
A=07 #
I I 1 0.001 0 003
FIGURE 3
from above, fo r weak coupl ing from below. This
can be understood from a per tu rba t ion study in E
of the Langevin a lgor i thm along the l ines of
Ref. I i . Deta i ls of th is study w i l l be given in
Ref. 10.
<lal>
0 5 1 - u
05(
OZ~!
O~E O,~
O,Z~7
20x20 A=I.0
N =60 D
N =2#
N=12 x
L 0.06
I 0.12
N=6 o I
018 CN
FIGURE 4
598 N. Attig et aL / The lattice Gross-Neveu model
In Figure 4 we show < o > fo r ~ = 1 and fo r
several values of N as a func t ion o f oN. Again
the open po in t a t c = 0 is taken from an analy-
t i c c a l c u l a t i o n . Ex t rapo la t i ng our numerical da-
ta l i n e a r l y in ~ and then l i n e a r l y in I/N fo r
N = 12, 24 and 60 we get fo r N== < o > = . 5 1 1 ,
in e x c e l l e n t agreement w i th the ana l y t i c r e s u l t
fo r N = =, which is < o > = .5114. For N = 6
(n f = 12) the I/N 2 co r rec t i on which we have not
evaluated a n a l y t i c a l l y is as expected s i g n i f i -
can t ly outs ide our numerical e r ro r s .
<1~1>
06 o
OL.
02
O0 08
6 , 6 0
N : 6 0 e : 0 0001
0
0
0
0
o l I I I I 1 I
10 1.2 1/* l / A
FIGURE 5a
<1~1)
05
03
6x60
o N : 6
o ~ : 0 0005 o
+
#~o o 01 o
I I I I I I I 08 10 1.2 1~
FIGURE 5b
In Figures 5a and b is shown < Io i> on a 6 x 6 0
l a t t i c e f o r N = 60 and 6 r espec t i ve l y . Each
po in t corresponds to 300,000 sweeps. For N = 60
we see the expected behaviour corresponding to
a second order phase t r a n s i t i o n . One can e s t i -
mate 1/~ c = 1.39. For N = =, the a n a l y t i c ca l -
cu la t i on gives I / ~ c = 1.43. The d i f f e rence is
compat ib le w i th a 1 /N-cor rec t ion .
For N = 6 we get instead s t rong ly f l u c t u a t -
ing values f o r o, in disagreement w i th Ref. 9.
We are present ly i n v e s t i g a t i n g i f the e f f e c t we
see is due to k i n k - a n t i k i n k con f i gu ra t i ons , pre-
sent at f i n i t e N.
4. CONCLUSIONS
From our h i g h - s t a t i s t i c s s imu la t ion we see
tha t the behaviour o f the order parameter < o >
is in agreement w i th the a n a l y t i c 1/N expansion
on the l a t t i c e down to N = 6 (n f = 12). For the
c r i t i c a l temperature the s i t u a t i o n is more com-
p l i c a t e d . The data at N = 6 look l i k e those
expected fo r a f i r s t order t r a n s i t i o n or might
be due to K ink -an t i k i nk s ta tes .
This quest ion and the ~-dependence of the Lange-
v in a lgo r i t hm w i l l be f u r t h e r discussed in Ref.
i0 .
REFERENCES
1 .
2.
3 .
4.
5.
6 .
7.
8 .
9.
D.J. Gross and A. Neveu, Phys. Rev. DIO (1974) 3235.
R. Dashen, B. Hasslacher and A. Neveu, Phys. Rev. D12 (1975) 2443.
L. Jacobs, Phys. Rev. DIO (1974) 3956.
B.J. Horr ington and A. Y i l d i z , Phys. Rev. D l l (1975) 779.
R.F. Dashen, S. Ma and R. Rajaraman, Phys. Rev. D l l (1975) 1499.
Y. Cohen, S. E l i t z u r and E. Rab inov ic i , Nucl. Phys. B220 [FS8] (1983) 102.
T. J o l i c o e u r , A. Morel and B. Petersson, Nucl. Phys. B274 (1986) 225; A. Morel, i n : La t t i ce Gauge Theory '86, eds. H. Satz e t a l . (Plenum Press 1987) p. 245.
T. Jo l i coeu r , Phys. Le t t . B171 (1986) 431.
F. Karsch, J. Kogut and H.W. Wyld, l l l i n o i s p r e p r i n t ILL-(TH)-86-36 (1986)
N. Attig et al. / The lattice Gross-Neveu model 599
I0. N. A t t i g , R. Lacaze, A. Morel, B. Petersson and M. Wolff , to appear.
11. C.G. Batrauni, G.R. Katz, A.S. Kronfeld, G.P. Lepage, B. Svet i tsky and K. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D32 (1985) 2736,
Part of th is work was supported by the
Commission of the European Communities
(Twining contract n ° 86300272 FROI*PU*JUI).