the lake victoria initiative initiated in 1999. a time frame of 20 years is envisaged. objective: to...
TRANSCRIPT
The Lake Victoria Initiative
• Initiated in 1999. • A time frame of 20 years is envisaged.• Objective: to contribute to poverty
reduction within a framework of sustainable development
• a regional Approach• Strategic Partnership agreement signed in
2001 twn EAC, Sweden, France, Norway, WB,EADB.
Lake Victoria Strategy - the areas of intervention
• Capacity development for sustainable development
• Empowerment of Communities & individuals• Sound environment and sustainable use of natural
resources • Combating HIV/AIDS• Private sector development for economic growth
Special emphasis to be given to multidimensional programs and projects - promote the three dimensions of sustainable development
Capacity development for sustainable development
• Support to organisations within the EAC structure
• Support to regional co-operation• Support to civil society organisations• Support to local authorities• Knowledge development of the links between
poverty reduction and sustainable development
Capacity building strategies
• Technical assistance Mainly for project management expertise. short term and not build dependence.
• Use of local/regional consultants to beef up slim staffing
• Tailored courses. Courses tailored to suit the local environment with participants working on local case studies.
• Research responding to local needs and problems encourage partnering across countries and across disciplines.
Capacity building strategies
Exchange of experiences/sharing of best practices thru• Partnerships (north-south) - Swedish NGOs partnering
with east African NGOs. mixed results. • Study tours, between organizations with similar
mandates. Visits always based on ToR that identify the possible learning areas, which experiences are relevant. Good results.
• Regional networks and collaboration between different bodies positive peer pressure, also serves to ensure non duplication of interventions.
Experiences
• institutional set up and institution building important. No parallel structures
• Human resource development concurrent with institutional development.
• Should respond to need (enable individuals to perform their jobs better) and be based on a capacity needs analysis/plan.
Experiences
• importance of clear definition the capacity building objectives- insufficient definition and preparations result in ambiguous results
• Ownership - both the processes and products must be owned – No donor labels
Challenges
• The understanding of partnership vis-a-vis the donor-recipient relations.
• Long chain of channeling the support • High/distorted expectations of the partners
when you talk about capacity building. • How to balance institutional strengthening,
capacity building and direct activities as appropriate.
Maximising benefits
• Critical is to address the underlying causes of poverty such as poor governance, unsupportive policies and lack of participation.
• Institutional achorage
• Involvement + enhanced collaboration (CSOs, Govt, PS)
• Decision making at lowest appropriate level
• Thank you