the kelkar committee controversy

6
THE KELKAR COMMITTEE CONTROVERSY The government on 9 th  September 2002 set up a task force on direct taxes headed by Mr. Vijay Kelkar, advisor to Finance Minister Jaswant Singh, for rationalising and simplifying procedures while strengthening enforcement to improve revenue mop up. Vijay Kelkar is drawing applause and, in equal measure, criticism for the paradigm shift in fiscal reforms proposed in the report released by the task force. This is not different from the reactions to any radical reform pronouncement and Kelkar should take it with a pinch of salt. Criticism has come from virtually all quarters including the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party citing that if implemented, it could prove to be "politically costly" for the National Democratic Front government. But it is the single suggestion that government should lower tax rates and scrap all existing tax rebates and savings incentives, that has outraged the middle class. The intense opposition to Kelkar's suggestions is not even based on actual numbers - it is more an issue of sentiment and perception. First, tax-paying Indians feel betrayed yet again at the threat of a promised tax break being withdrawn within a couple of years after it was offered. This means that those who availed of a 10 or 15-year housing loan assuming certain tax breaks, will suddenly find themselves in a jam because the government changed its mind again. Second, honest tax payers who have felt harassed and ripped off by the government for decades, simply do not believe that tax rates will be reduced enough to offset the losses due to removal of exemptions. Or, even if the government reduces tax rates initially, that it will not hike them again within a year. So fierce is the anger that government is scurrying to distance itself from the Kelkar recommendations. On the other hand Kelkar argues that the recommendations will leave a higher disposable income at the hands of taxpayers, notwithstanding the elimination of standard deduction and exemptions on small savings. According to experts, the case can be illustrated by assessees whose taxable income is below Rs 200,000, and who account for a significant percentage of the tax net. The industry, however, is in favour of eli minating tax exemptions, as recommended by the Kelkar task forces on direct and indirect taxes in the draft consultative reports, according to the latest snap  poll of chief executive officers (CEOs) conducted by the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII).

Upload: paps353529555442

Post on 02-Jun-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Kelkar Committee Controversy

8/10/2019 The Kelkar Committee Controversy

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kelkar-committee-controversy 1/6

THE KELKAR COMMITTEE CONTROVERSY

The government on 9th

  September 2002 set up a task force on direct taxes headed by Mr. Vijay

Kelkar, advisor to Finance Minister Jaswant Singh, for rationalising and simplifying procedures

while strengthening enforcement to improve revenue mop up.

Vijay Kelkar is drawing applause and, in equal measure, criticism for the paradigm shift in fiscalreforms proposed in the report released by the task force. This is not different from the reactions to

any radical reform pronouncement and Kelkar should take it with a pinch of salt.

Criticism has come from virtually all quarters including the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party citing that

if implemented, it could prove to be "politically costly" for the National Democratic Front

government.

But it is the single suggestion that government should lower tax rates and scrap all existing tax

rebates and savings incentives, that has outraged the middle class. The intense opposition to Kelkar'ssuggestions is not even based on actual numbers - it is more an issue of sentiment and perception.

First, tax-paying Indians feel betrayed yet again at the threat of a promised tax break being

withdrawn within a couple of years after it was offered.

This means that those who availed of a 10 or 15-year housing loan assuming certain tax breaks, will

suddenly find themselves in a jam because the government changed its mind again.

Second, honest tax payers who have felt harassed and ripped off by the government for decades,

simply do not believe that tax rates will be reduced enough to offset the losses due to removal of

exemptions.

Or, even if the government reduces tax rates initially, that it will not hike them again within a year.

So fierce is the anger that government is scurrying to distance itself from the Kelkar

recommendations.

On the other hand Kelkar argues that the recommendations will leave a higher disposable incomeat the hands of taxpayers, notwithstanding the elimination of standard deduction and exemptions on

small savings.

According to experts, the case can be illustrated by assessees whose taxable income is below Rs200,000, and who account for a significant percentage of the tax net.

The industry, however, is in favour of eliminating tax exemptions, as recommended by the Kelkar

task forces on direct and indirect taxes in the draft consultative reports, according to the latest snap

 poll of chief executive officers (CEOs) conducted by the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII).

Page 2: The Kelkar Committee Controversy

8/10/2019 The Kelkar Committee Controversy

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kelkar-committee-controversy 2/6

 Taxable income Rs

80000-120000 Taxable income Rs

150000-200000 

As of now After

Kelkar As of now

After

Kelkar 

Gross salary 120000 120000 185000 185000

Standard deduction 30000 0 30000 0

Income from other

sources2000 2000 9500 9500

Deduction under Section

80L2000 0 9500 0

Deduction under Section

80CCC0 10000 0 10000

Tax on total income 7000 2400 20500 16900

Investments in savings

schemes26500 0 50000 0

Investments in pension

schemes or Mediclaim0 12000 0 15000

Tax payable 1700 0 13000 13900

Surcharge @ 5% 85 0 650 0

Cash inflow 120000 120000 194500 194500

Cash outflow 28285 22000 63650 38900

Cash in hand 93715 100000 130850 155600

Given a choice between the current tax regime and the one suggested by the Kelkar task force ondirect taxes, 81 per cent of the respondents chose the latter.

The poll also showed that the top CEOs in the country would rather have the exemptions done away

with in a phased manner than in one single step.

The 2,400 companies, which paid corporate tax of Rs 27,133 crore in the last two years and

distributed dividends of Rs 19,531 crore, will save almost Rs 6,937 crore annually, based on

conservative estimates, if the committee’s recommendations are accepted in toto.

However, the withdrawal of tax exemptions granted under Sections 10A and 10B and alternatives

recommended by the Vijay Kelkar Committee "will be a setback to the software industry", the National Association of Software and Services Companies (Nasscom) said here today.

The panel's report is yet to be accepted by the government. If accepted, the proposals are likely to be

implemented in the Union Budget for 2003-04 (April-March) to be unveiled in late February.

Following are highlights of the panel's direct and indirect tax proposals:

Page 3: The Kelkar Committee Controversy

8/10/2019 The Kelkar Committee Controversy

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kelkar-committee-controversy 3/6

DIRECT TAXES: 

•  Three personal income tax tiers to be replaced by two tiers. Income between Rs 100,000-400,000 will be subjected to 20 per cent tax. All income above 400,000 will be subjected to

tax at 30 per cent.

• 

Dividends received from Indian companies will be fully exempt.•  Long term capital gains on listed equity will be fully exempt.

•  Standard deduction for salaried taxpayers will be reduced to nil. However, exemption for

conveyance allowance subject to a ceiling of Rs 9,600 will continue.

•  Interest subsidy of two percent for housing loans up to 500,000 to all borrowers.

•  Reduction in corporate tax rate from existing levels of 36.75 per cent to 30 per cent for

domestic firms and 35 per cent for foreign companies over a period of three years.

•  Elimination of Minimum Alternate Tax under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act

INDIRECT TAXES: 

Customs duty: 

•  Multiplicity of levies must be reduced. There should be only three types of duties: a basic

customs duty, an additional duty of customs and anti-dumping/safeguard duties.

•  Zero per cent duty for life-saving drugs and equipment, defence and security related goodsand imports by the Reserve Bank of India.

•  Ten per cent duty for raw material, inputs and intermediate goods and 20 per cent for

consumer durables by 2004-05.

•  By 2006-07, five per cent duty for basic raw materials such as coal, ores and concentrates,

xylenes; eight per cent for intermediate goods; 10 per cent for finished goods other than

consumer durables; and 20.0 per cent for consumer durables.

• 

 Nominal reduction in duty on motor vehicles to 50 per cent from 60. Import duty on secondhand cars may continue at existing levels.

•  Exemption for cellphones from countervailing duty may be withdrawn but basic import duty

may be cut to zero in 2003-04.

•  Eight per cent duty on crude oil, 15 per cent on petroleum products by 2003-04 and five per

cent on crude oil and 10 per cent on petroleum products by 2004-05.

•  Higher duty of up to 150 per cent for specified agriculture products.

•  Duty cuts should be in stages of five per cent each year.

Excise duty: 

•  Zero per cent duty for life-saving drugs and equipment, security items, food items and

agricultural products.

•  Six per cent duty for processed food products and matches.

•  Twenty per cent rate for motor vehicles, airconditioners and aerated water.

•  Separate rates for tobacco products and their substitutes.

•  Bulk tea may be exempt from excise duty.

•  Central excise duty on kerosene may be raised to one rupee a litre.

•  Warehousing facility for petroleum products should be withdrawn.

Page 4: The Kelkar Committee Controversy

8/10/2019 The Kelkar Committee Controversy

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kelkar-committee-controversy 4/6

 

Annexure -1

Following are the proposals for individuals:

Agricultural income:  Agricultural income should be taxed at normal rates. Taxpayers with an

agricultural income should fill in a different form.

Capital gains: Long-term capital gains will be taxed at normal rates. However, tax on long-term

capital gains on equity will be exempt.

Dividend paid to shareholders will be exempt. No tax on distribution of dividends .

Interest on housing loans: Deduction for mortgage interest on loans to buy a owner-occupieddwelling should be reduced to Rs 100,000 in AY 2004-05, to Rs 50,000 in AY 2005-06 and to nil in

AY 2006- 07.

Deletion of tax concessions: Tax concessions are now available in terms of: a) 'Exemptions' under

Sec. 10, b) 'Income Deductions' under Chapter VI-A and c) 'Tax Rebates' under Chapter VIII.

The committee appears keen to eliminate all deductions. Some essential deductions will be

converted into rebates but the rebate will be at the minimum marginal rate of personal income tax -

20 per cent.

The following concessions will be withdrawn :

Sec. 16(i): Standard deduction available to employees.

Sec. 88: Tax rebates on investments in specified assets such as NSC, NSS, EPF and PPF, tax saving

units of mutual funds, premium paid on life insurance, repayment of housing loans, and

infrastructure bonds of IDBI and ICICI.

Sec. 80L: Interest income and dividends from specified sources.

Sec. 88B: The Rs 15,000 tax rebate to senior citizens. Currently, a senior citizen should have

completed 65 years on the last date of the FY. Henceforth, senior citizens will be taxpayers who are

more than 65 years in age on the first day of the financial year.

Sec. 88C: Tax rebate of Rs 5,000 to non-senior female citizens.

The following income deductions will be converted into tax rebates.

Educational expenses: Sec. 80E provides for deduction up to Rs 40,000 on repayment of a loan

taken for higher education to be converted to a tax rebate at the rate of 20 per cent with the

maximum restricted to Rs 4,000.

Page 5: The Kelkar Committee Controversy

8/10/2019 The Kelkar Committee Controversy

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kelkar-committee-controversy 5/6

Medical expenses: Sec. 80D provides for a Rs 15,000 deduction on medical insurance premium and

Sec. 80DDB provides Rs 40,000 for medical treatment. The tax benefit under Sec. 80D and 80DDBis to be retained only as a rebate @ 20 per cent subject to a maximum of Rs 3000 and 4,000

respectively.

Wealth tax will be abolished.

Annexure -2 

Kelkar Committee’s proposals regarding direct taxes for corporates 

The Kelkar Committee has suggested two ways of implementing a package of reforms:

Option-I: An immediate, one-time institution of rate cuts and elimination of exemptions.

Option-II: A coordinated phase-out of tax exemptions and deductions over a period of, say, three

years.

The committee favours the first option, which would prevent lobbying by special interest groups.

The following are the salient recommendations:

Reduction in corporate tax rate  from the existing levels of 36.75 per cent to 30 per cent for

domestic companies and to 35 per cent for foreign companies.

Exemption of long-term capital gains on equity.

Elimination of minimum alternate tax under section 115JB. Unabsorbed depreciation will bemerged with business loss and will lose its separate identity.

Business loss would be allowed to be carried forward indefinitely . Removal of the followingexemptions u/s 10 and deductions under Chapter VIA with immediate effect and not by a sunset

clause :

a) Sec. 10A and 10B related with newly established undertakings in free trade zone and 100 per cent

export- oriented undertakings.

 b) Sec. 80-IA in respect of profit and gains from industrial undertakings or enterprises engaged in

infrastructure development or telecommunication service or development of industrial park orspecial economic zones or generation, transmission or distribution of power.

c) Sec. 80-IB  in respect of profits and gains from certain industrial undertakings other than

infrastructure development undertakings (this includes backward areas also).

d) Sec. 80JJAA in respect of employment of new workmen.

Page 6: The Kelkar Committee Controversy

8/10/2019 The Kelkar Committee Controversy

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-kelkar-committee-controversy 6/6

e) Sec. 80M in respect of inter corporate dividends.

f) The phase out programme in respect of sections 80HHB, 80HHBA, 80HHC, 80HHD, 80HHE,

80HHF, 80-O, 80R, 80RR and 80RRA will continue.

Depreciation allowance u/s 32 will be restricted to the allowance charged to the profit and lossaccount under the provisions of the Companies Act.

Sources :

1.  http://finmin.nic.in/kelkar/2.  http://incometaxinfo.com/kelkar/kelkar.html

3.  www.rediff.com/money

4.  The Business Standard5.

 

The Economic Times

6.  The Business Line

Chetain Jain