the harmonization process from the reneb … · abend et al. radiation research 2016, ainsbury et...
TRANSCRIPT
EC FP7, GA 295513
Biomarkers ranking
Dicentricassay: DCA
Translocationanalysis :
FISH Assay
MicronucleusAssay : MN
Laurence Roy1, Liz Ainsbury2, Christophe Badie2, Leonardo Barrios3, Céline Bassinet1, Paola Fattibene4,
Eric Gregoire1, Ursula Oestreicher5, Gabriel Pantelias6, Sisko Salomaa7, Georgia Terzoudi6, Francois Trompier1,
Anne Vral8, Andrzej Wojcik9, Ulrike Kulka5
1 Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
2 Public Health England, CRCE, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, United Kingdom
3 Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
4 Istituto di Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
5 Bundesamt fuer Strahlenschutz, Department Radiation Protection and Health, Oberschleissheim, Germany
6 National Centre for Scientific Research "Demokritos", Athens, Greece
7 University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
8 Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium9 Stockholm University, Institute Molecular Biosciences, Stockholm, Sweden
The harmonization process from the RENEB
operational biological and physical
retrospective dosimetry network
to new biomarker validation.
www.reneb.eu
Background European Network for fast individual dose estimationin large scale scenarios
EU project: 1.1.2012 – 31.12.2015Established network: since 01.01.2016
Sensitivity Specificity Reporting time
and capacityTime
persistance
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L5
L7
L8
L9L10
L11
L12
L13
L14
L15
Training Scientific visits Interlaboratory comparisons (ILC) Quality manual, documentation On going activities:
- DCA: ILC on 500 cells in collaboration with EURADOS- FISH : homogenity in the scoring process- MN: improuvent of the staining
Newly investigated
1 2 3 4 5 6 7Gene expression assay Telomere Centromereγ-H2AX foci analysis RAMAN spectroscopy
2 institutions trained
9 institutions trained
OSL: 5institutions trained
No training No training No training
OSL: several ILC. Electronic components: Difficulties to identify the relevant componentsEPR: variability of material response
Perform a standard ILC analysis and identify the parameters affecting the results
Image and slides sharing.Z test passed successfully for several set of samples
ILC on blood samples shipment not yet performed
Some good candidates have been successfully used in ILCEffect of transportation conditions tested
To be validated on in vivo exposed populations
Involved in a large ILCJust one lab performing the assay up to nowTwo doses out of 4 have been correctly estimated
Identification of the parameters affecting the resultsNew ILC with more labs involved
ILC carried out by dicentricscoring on images. Homogeneous results. Promising approach for highly accurate biodosimetry”
ILC on slides and blood samples to be performed.Standard Z test to be used
Abend et al. Radiation Research 2016, Ainsbury et al. IJRB 2016, Grégoire et al. IJRB 2016, Manning et al. IJRB 2016, Rothkamm et al. Radiation Research 2013, Terzoudi et al. IJRB 2016,
CHO PCC Assay“
MAD: not as good as other biomarkersHas been successfully used in case of simulated partial body exposure
Antibody validation process to be implemented in routine
Glass:EPRand TL
Electronic compo-nents: OSL and TL
References
Operational biomarkers
Under validation
L1
L2
L3L4
L5
L6
L5
L7
L8
L9L10
L11
L12
L13
L14
L15
Gene expression
g-H2AX
DicentricsMicronuclei
PCC
Dicentrics
OSL/TL
OSL/TL
g-H2AX PCCOSL/TL Dicentrics Raman
Under
investigation:Translocations