the green hilton agreement - geneva 1963

8/13/2019 The Green Hilton Agreement - Geneva 1963

1/13

2008 November 28

from AyemmoWebsiteBy 1961, Keynespredictions of a world monetary crisis began to become a reality.This problem was brought about by the lack of sufficient currency (especially US Dollars) in world circulation

to support the rapidly expanding international commerce. The World needed US Dollars beyond the capacity

of the good faith and credit of the United States Taxpayer in order to facilitate trade.

It was not possible to break the Bretton Woods treaty due to the possible damage of the stable core of the

worlds economy as this had the potential of leading to another major war. To compound the problem, the

majority of dollars in circulation were in private banks, multinational corporations, private businesses and

individual bank accounts.

In 1963 the gold that had been entrusted to the care of President Soekarno was recalled by the Nations to

underpin the issuance of further US Dollars in order to further facilitate international trade. Under this

Agreement, Soekarno (as the International Trustee Holder of the Gold) began the process of repositioning the

gold that had earlier been entrusted to the care of the Indonesian People, back into the banking system to

create a fractional backing for the US Dollar.Initially this was managed under the arbitration of the Tripartite Gold Commissionin The Hague as per the

decisions of the International Community through their Government representatives at the

Innsbruck/Schweitzer Conference and its later revisions.Under the agreement signed between President Soekarnoand President John Kennedy, was that control

of these assets would cede automatically to US upon the fall from power of President Soekarno.This occurred in 1967. The potential of this agreement led to Executive Order 11110issued July 1963, which

would have provided the Department of the Treasury the power to issue United States Dollars. Within two

weeks after signing the Green Hilton Agreement which would have then enabled consolidation of EO 11110.Kennedy was assassinated a few days after his signing of the Green Hilton Agreement. With the death of

Kennedy, the authority granted to the Treasury was never taken up.

Soekarno was awarded a 2.5% interest in the assets by the International Community in return for his

services. He willed all the documents of guarantee and obligation to his Teacher ***** ***** ******** and his

heir, ** **** *** ********.

To this day, these agreements stand to be honored (which was accommodated in full under the

RESPECTING THE RIGHTS TREATY - BANGKOK - 2003). The assets were placed into the International

Collateral Combined Accounts that form the Global Debt Facility.

While an apparently innocuous document to read, in its proper and full interpretation, The Green Hilton
http://ayemmo.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/the-green-hilton-agreement-geneva-1963/http://ayemmo.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/the-green-hilton-agreement-geneva-1963/http://ayemmo.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/the-green-hilton-agreement-geneva-1963/http://ayemmo.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/the-green-hilton-agreement-geneva-1963/http://ayemmo.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/the-green-hilton-agreement-geneva-1963/http://ayemmo.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/the-green-hilton-agreement-geneva-1963/http://ayemmo.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/the-green-hilton-agreement-geneva-1963/http://ayemmo.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/the-green-hilton-agreement-geneva-1963/https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Executive_Order_11110http://ayemmo.wordpress.com/http://ayemmo.wordpress.com/2010/04/29/the-green-hilton-agreement-geneva-1963/


2/13

Agreement is one of the most profound agreements made between Presidents of any two countries within

the twentieth century, and most probably, in the history of the world, particularly so as this agreement was

made between a President of the United States and the Trustee of the hidden, but combined wealth of the

world.These assets are not the property of the United States, but centralized assets under the authority of a

centralized system, to be used as independently deemed to be for the better benefit of the World.

Original Message

From: PZ

To:

Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 3:56 AM

Subject: Wanta Fraud and Whistleblower

*Regarding: Wanta Fraud and Mr. Whistleblower*

http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_static/general/contact_us.php

FROM: Mr. Whistleblower

TO: [email protected]

SENT: Tuesday, Mardch 04, 2008 11:56 p.m.SUBJECT: Wanta Fraud

Regardless if one agrees with the account given by Mr. Whistleblower, there is one sentence

which fails to connect to the other parts of the story.He writes:

At the same time, and there are two prominent points here, successive US

Governments from 1963, following the execution of the *Green Hilton Treaty by

President Kennedy and President Soekarno* (Note: Kennedy was assassinated

10 days after the signing of this Treaty), refused to recognize the Combined

International Accounts and the Green Hilton Treaty.

As I have seen the Green Hilton Treaty (full title: Agreement Green Hilton Memorial Building

Geneve and Certificate of Geneve, signed by 3 persons, witnessed by 9 persons) some years

back, I am wondering what the connection between the Wanta caseand the Green Hilton

Treaty might be? Can you forward my question to Mr. Whistleblower and act as a go-between

for his replay?

Thanks and best regards

PZ

(Response) Original Message

From: Whistleblower

To: Bellringer

Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 9:31 PM

Subject: Re: Fw: Wanta Fraud and Whistleblower

Dear Mr Bellringer,

In response to the question from PZ.

Dear PZ:

Thank you for your question via fourwinds10.com.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/wantareaganmitterrand_protocols.pdf


3/13

Our response on same follows:

The comments in question do not relate directly to the other content. They are

meant to clearly indicate that the US, by not recognizing the Green Hilton

Treaty, actually deny that the assets held by President Soekarno are part of the

Combined International Collateral Accounts of the Global Debt Facility, thus

implying that they still belong to the original Owners (hereditary or otherwise).

The fact is that assets held by Soekarno were not owned by Indonesia, its numerousSultanates, or otherwise, but by several other countries, Royal Families, etc. which were

deposited in Indonesia commencing 1921, which is the very same period as assets were

deposited in The Philippines.

It was the Japanese who were charged by the Worlds Nations to undertake the excavation of

tunnels, mines, bunkers, etc, and deposit assets within same as and when then were shipped

to Indonesia.

It is common knowledge that over the years the US has deliberately broadcast over the

Airwaves, that they are the real owners and that anyone locating or finding any assets should

report same to the US Embassy immediately. This was a ploy by the US to locate assets and

ultimately steal them. Not recognizing the Green Hilton Treaty, which was relevant to Indonesiaand President Soekarno, allowed the US to lay claim to the assets and thus steal / plunder

them for their own purpose.

Additionally, the US, by its denials and non-recognition of the Green Hilton Treaty, opened the

doors for descendants of President Soekarno, plus many others who were appointed as

Secondary Holders, Administrators, Sub-secondary Holders / Custodians etc by President

Soekarno (Note: we hold a full list of these people, which is embodied within President

Soekarnos records, Volume 4), to lay claim to the assets held in Indonesia.

The very same situation arises with The Philippines and other countries. In Russia alone,

during the Yeltsin era, President Clinton claimed that the Gold deposited in Russia was

actually owned by the US. Thousands of MT of Gold were moved out of Russia by train intoSwitzerland and Germany, under orders of President Yeltsin.

This movement was monitored and President Yeltsin was held to order on this. His condition to

step down from the Presidency of the Russian Federation, entailed a Full International

Immunity from prosecution for his criminal acts of Theft of Assets from the Collateral Accounts

in conjunction with others (These acts are beginning to come back and bite the other persons

involved quite viciously).

Coming back to the point of issue. The statement was made as an example to indicate the

tactics used by the US to steal, illegally use, plunder, etc the assets of the Combined

International Collateral Accounts. The example was considered to be the best possible

example as it linked to a situation in the US which is still questionable today. Other examples

could not be used as much as this, and corrective actions against such il legal use, abuse,

theft etc, are all Classified.

In respect of your statement claiming you have seen the Green Hilton Treaty. We do not

dispute your claim on this, but advise as to caution. The reason being is that there are at least

Three (3) known forgeries of this Treaty in existence. There may be more. All differ from each

other and all of them do lead to confusion with those who make claims of having read the

Treaty.

It is not known who composed any of the forgeries, although guesses are abound.


4/13

The Real Treaty states, that an agreement has been reached, and shall be referred to as a

Treaty between Sovereign Nations, by the President of the United States and the President of

Indonesia, that Assets of the Combined International Collateral Accounts pursuant to Treaties

. (numerous Treaties referred to) . and held under Custodianship within Indonesia,

shall be transferred to (Name of location in the USA) and utilized by the USA to

fractionally back the International Currency of the US Dollar. Note, the content of the treaty

actually states several further issues, but the above is the main issue.

In return for President Soekarnos cooperation in this matter, conjointly with the Owner / Sole

Arbiter, Indonesia were given financial Hereditary rights equal to 2.5% of the value of theassets, to be used within Indonesia to assist in the development of the country.

Those rights and with full reference to the Green Hilton Treaty were confirmed within the

Recognizing the Rights Treaty, Bangkok, Thailand, dated 2003.

You will also find reference to all of this within various Schweitzer / Innsbruck Conventions.

Needless to say, the assets have yet to be used for the benefit of Indonesia. Some have been

moved illegally, some stolen / plundered, but basically the two aforementioned Treaties remain

ineffective and unrecognized by the US, whom, through the Federal Reserve prevent

movement, allotment, allocation, or otherwise of same for use not only for Indonesia, but for

every other country in the World and the People.

Many Indonesians, as with Filipinos, travel the World holding various Gold and Platinum Bullion

Certificates, claiming they are the owners of the Bullion, only to be arrested and incarcerated.

This will continue until the Truth comes out.

There is no direct connection to the Wanta case, as may or may not have been implied. The

statement was used as an example to indicate to others what mechanisms are used by the

US and others to illegal use, steal, plunder, etc, assets of the Combined International

Collateral Accounts.

We apologize if this lead to a misunderstanding, as we did not purposely or intentionally

design this statement to be misleading.

There are many factors connected to the Combined International Collateral Accounts, illegal

activities, theft, plunder, etc that are all inter-related in one way or another whereby to isolate

one issue away from all the others is not easy. To understand the enormity of the situation one

has to understand the whole picture and appreciate the relativity of one part to other parts.

We do not purposely or intentionally restrict illegal activities to the US, although the US is

responsible for a substantial majority of the problems involved. Other Countries, Central Banks,

Rogue elements of Intelligence Agencies, Commercial Banks, individuals, have also been

active in the area of Theft, Plunder, Illegal use.

We hope that this has satisfactory explained the statement we have made, and we thank youfor your interest in same. Please feel free to seek further answers should you find the need to

do so.

Kindest regards.

Whistleblower.

Additional information at "QUESTIONS TO MR. WHISTLEBLOWER(Updated April 29, 2009)".
http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/nesara/news/news.php?q=1240081606


5/13

Strange Discussion on Wikipedia About...

"Green Hilton Agreement"July 18, 2006

from CassiopaeaForumWebsite

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Executor-usaYour continued donations keep Wikipedia running!

User talk:Executor-usa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

I'm sorry but I had to block you and the other editor you were warring with for violating the

Three-revert rule. I have made the block for 11 hours for both parties to accept that this will

have be talked out, not warred out. --Alf melmac 23:25, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

ALF, I have accurate and verified information that OITC is real and not a fraud. It has been

subject to a disinformation campaign throughout the internet. Since this site purports to provide

encyclopedia information, it should not be used as a disinformation site. If you have proper

security clearances and authorizations, and follow protocols for level 3-5 security rules you can

get a verification.I communicate with top level government officials and so do others posting against this

disinformation campaign. Your other poster has no real information, only disinformation and the

spreading of false stories by authors who never had access or proper information.

In the meantime, guidance for disputes over accuracy is laid out at Wikipedia:Accuracy

dispute and the process for resolving disputes is laid out at Wikipedia:Resolving disputes. --Alf

melmac 23:38, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

I thank the pair of you for being understanding and replying so postively. I hope the matter can

be resolved amicably. --Alf melmac 23:48, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

This is an unusual situation. It involves classified institutions protected by the US Congress

under security rules 3-5. If you have such security clearence, the Chairman of the Ways and

Means Committee has the full jacket. It requires formal authorization. This is not a dispute that

can be settled by the uninformed and unauthorized. Allowing the authorship and reprinting of

intentional mis information in this case is improper.

No amount of unauthorized research will turn up anything of substance, only misinformation.

The other party writing, can only find and post misinformation. News stories etc do not provide

truth. If you happen to be a head of state or head of a central bank, providing that you follow

security protocols, you can get verification. Treaties between nations, and classified protocols

attached to them, are a fact of life that impacts this discussion.

Classifying this as a fraud and implying that its officers are criminals is improper. The courts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Executor-usahttp://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.phphttp://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=2366.0http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=2366.0


6/13

have ruled that no web site may be exempt from the rules of defamation. The author

Waffelknocker is a police officer who has investigated OITC and who knows that it is real and

neither a fraud nor otherwise criminal.Your other author just repeats falsehoods and stories written without access to real

information. OITC is very real. Classification protocols are intended to prevent unauthorized

access, and this frustrates many writers who think that they deserve such information. He,

however, knowingly ignores all countering information, as such his own behavior is now quite

possibly criminally slanderous.

128.59.153.160 intentionally deleted sources supporting the information provided by

Waffelknocker. I believe that permitting this misinformation campaign to persist is defamatory

and I will recommend that litigation is initiated.

Contents

[hide]

* 1 Hello, OITC Thailand

* 2 Blocked for legal threats

* 3 Hi, OITC Thailand

* 4 Who are you?[edit]

Hello, OITC Thailand

Hey, you guys there in Thailand... Do you really think you are going to scare us by saying that

you are "police officers" and "have links with international authorities"? You are nothing but a

bunch of cheap scammers, trying to make a buck out of the backs of poor people. You failed

miserably in the Rover case, in Fiji and now in Ecuador.Mind you, now the info about your escapades is all over the net. And we are monitoring you to

check where else the ugly head of your scam shows up. So keep going on, people, because

now there are some good citizens that will take the time and effort to unmask you, no matter

where you go or what language you use. Say hi to Pablito and Keith (if you are Ray ;)

Sayonara!

REPLY: Wrong people. The promise about litigation is real. No scams have ever been done by

OITC. See you in court.

REPLY 2: Like you took the Fiji Times / Fiji Sun / Fiji Village to court? No kidding, they are

still waiting to hear from your lawyer. They are also looking forward to seeing "Dr." Scott

coming back... But of course, none of that will happen. Fatty Scott will never go back.INTERPOL is checking on him as well as on Chchat :)

REPLY: INTERPOL HAS NO PROBLEM WITH OITC. SEE YOU IN COURT.

REPLY 3: Oh, really? Good that you console yourself that way :) Once their agents come

knocking at your door you will feel a bit surprised, thought ;) About court, again, I most

certainly will see you there... while you and your helpers are tried for fraud :) Looking forward to

it!

Reply to reply 3: The only charges will be defamation charges against you and other

defamatory writers. See you in court. It will be a pleasure taking your house and assets:)


7/13

REPLY 4: As you were thinking in taking over the houses and assets of the tribal in Fiji? Man,

oh man, what sweets dreams were destroyed by a few good journalists and the Fiji

Government and Police :) Bet you were already licking your lips thinking in all the good land

you were going to get for free. Too bad Commissioner Hughes is a no-nonsense officer ;) About

court, are you going to use there the same fake adress you put in the letter you sent with your

fake offer for Rover? ;) If so, at least change again the number of the house, it is getting

overused ;)

[edit]

Blocked for legal threats

Per Wikipedia's policy on legal threats, you are indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia until

your threat(s) of legal action against editors is either withdrawn or concluded. When this

happens, edit this page (you may still do so), leave the text {{unblock}} at the top and explain

that you will no longer be threatening legal action against editors. --Sam Blanning(talk) 22:28,

26 April 2006 (UTC)

Then this will have to be resolved in court. Not a threat, but a promise. This site and the writers

have a legal obligation to not publish malicious defamatory material. I request that this article

be deleted.

In the spirit of goodwill, I'm willing to nominate the article for deletion on your behalf, and

outside editors will discuss whether Wikipedia should keep it. Would you like to provide a brief

overview of the reasons why the article should be deleted for the benefit of editors? Please

make it as succint as possible. --Sam Blanning(talk) 22:37, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

This is part of a worldwide disinformation campaign against OITC. Waffelknocker is a police

officer who has investigated OITC. He has posted accurate information supported by fact. OITC

is a classified UN Chartered institution. The full jacket, security level 3-5, is held by the

Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. Verification requires authorization.

Chapter One on Redcat's Precious Metals Board has published a letter from the General

Counsel of the US Treasury in support of OITC and its' Chairman. He has had the letter verified.

The writers of this article only publish falsehoods, misinformation, and lies. They do soknowingly. They delete all writings contrary to their own misinformation campaign. They do so

even when their own writings are left alone. Any lawsuit against these writers will have as

witnesses the US Attorney General, as well as other such positioned officials. This is a fact

based upon personal knowledge. Do not damage this site by allowing it to be used for

malicious defamers. No amount of discussion on this site by the uninformed will bear any fruit.

You cannot resolve this conflict.

I've started a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OITC fraud. It will last at least five

days before being closed. --Sam Blanning(talk) 23:17, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

A comment on the deletion discussion raised a question about UN Chartered Control numbers.

This might help you : Redcat's Boards

> Precious Metals Discussion Forum

> UN "Charter" definition

>

Subject: UN "Charter" definition Posted By: Chapter10 - Registered User Posted At: (3/29/06

1:40)


8/13

UN "Charter" definition:

As stated within several United Nations Official Publications, some of which can be found on

the UN Web site, others are the official legal definitions as attributed by the United Nations and

found within records of the United Nations Library.

Definition:

The term "Charter" is used for particularly formal and solemn instruments, such as the

constituent treaty of an International Organization. The term itself has an emotive content thatgoes back to the Magna Carta of 1215. Well known recent examples are the Charter of the

United Nations of 1945 and the Charter of the Organization of American States.

Upon ascertaining the above definition, the question was posed as to how is a particular

Charter for a particular "Constituent treaty of an International Organization" (using the very

words as provided from the Web and given by the UN Official) could be located and thus

viewed. Reply, quote "Each Charter is allocated a Control Number, for referencing and

recording purposes. If you want to find a particular Charter you will be required to quote the

Control Number. Is there anything else Sir. Is there a specific Charter you would like to know

about Sir."The question was posed, quote "Are all Charters under the United Nations subject to Public

Access to Information Acts". Reply, quote "No Sir, there are many such documents that are

classified, which are not available for Public Access." "How many". Reply, quote "Many Sir. Is

there a particular Charter you are enquiring about". "No, no particular Charter. This is a general

enquiry for a paper I am writing. Thank you for your help." Reply, quote "Glad to be of

assistance Sir. If you need further information, please call back. Goodbye".

The above is a transcript of a telephone conversation between a 22 year old University Student

in the U.K. studying Law, and an official at the United Nations, Geneva. At the same time the

student was on the Web with the United Nations Web site open, clicking on various sections

based upon words or directions given by the UN official. The telephone call was quite

extensive. The above are the pertinent points of the conversation held. General conversation to

and from each person is not relevant and not transcribed.

Also posted by the same party:" I can also state that this letter has been verified as being

issued by Russell L. Munk, International Division, US Treasury, Washington DC, 20220, USA.

A further letter has now been delivered to the US Treasury, Senior Counsel US Treasury, Mr

Arnold I. Havens. This letter (following verification of the Munk letter) details specific pertinent

questions more elaborate that the answers contained in Munk's letter. It will be posted when a

response is received.

I can state that Russell L. Munk has now been verified as the General Counsel, International

Department, US Treasury, Washington D.C. 20220, USA, at the date of the letter. My

comments in the previous posts are as a result of thorough investigations undertaken by some

very senior friends working for a Police Authority. It would be highly unusual for them to make a

mistake, so I will admit to the possibility of an accidental omission, from a possible brief loss

of concentration, of the word Assistant in respect of Mr Munk.It is however irrelevant as to Mr Munk's position, as the actual letter is confirmed, by the very

same friends who have been in communication with the US Treasury, as being issued and

signed by Russell Munk.

We have to look at the overall situation and protocol involved. If what we are led to believe is

fact, then it would be reasonable to assume that any inquiry letter would have been addressed

to the General Counsel of the US Treasury. In which case, it is more than possible that the


9/13

said letter was passed to Russell Munk for a response, as he was of the International Division

of the US Treasury, but under the auspices of General Counsel.This being the case and the fact that the inquiry was addressed to the General Counsel it

would be highly respectful and indeed protocol (remember what we are told that H.E. R.C.

Damis a protected person, with level 3 -5 security, confirmed by the US Senate) to ensure

that the response came from the General Counsel, irrespective of the signature provided the

signature was from a person who holds the authority, position and responsibility to sign such

letters, either as legally representing the US Treasury, or under authority of the General

Counsel.

I believe that the General Counsel and Deputy General Counsel are political appointments,

which in itself may have some bearing on the issue, considering that the accusation has been

made in the past about the US Government and its Intelligence Agencies illegally using the

assets owned by R.C. Dam held under the Combined International Collateral Accounts.That would certainly account for a delegated responsibility factor, as I am reasonably sure in

saying that the political appointments would surely hesitate from putting their signatures to

such a letter.

I don't think the actual letter or signatory can be "questionable" as you put it , because of the

verification process undertaken, initiated and undertaken in conjunction with myself / police

authority. What is more to the point is the system of authority, delegation, position and

responsibility that is operational within the US Treasury, which I believe only the US Treasury

can inform us on this matter, as it is internal operations (sometimes politically oriented) and

not normally known to the public.

Just for the record, I am unbiased on this whole issue, and I do not post all precise detail,

which is where people tend to "pick up" on certain issues. Whether the OITC exists or not has

yet to be proven. As yet I have seen no proof that it doesn't exist, despite all the anti-postings

which lack substance. I have seen sufficient pro-OITC postings, with good information, and

have undertaken enormous research using some of that information.My opinion, as at this moment, is that the possibility of the existence of the OITC is beginning

to look more real based upon the evidence I have at hand undertaken by myself, friends in a

police authority, and several others including lawyers, UN officials, Members of the Queens

Court, and Lords of the Realm, even conversations with OITC people. You can't get much

better, or much higher.Whether I utilize one source or more at the same time and on the same point, I get the same

answers. I have yet to substantiate any of the anti-OITC comments posted on this Board and

in the Press, but I do admit, I haven't really focused on past histories of individuals involved,

suppositions, conjecture or similar. All research is based upon pertinent and relevant points

that are the Start Line...... Where the Finish Line is has yet to be seen.

I do not see much effort from other posters to obtain real information. All I have seen is "Cut

and Paste" stuff and simple general information without much substance."

OITC does not have a web site, it is classified, it has no connection to Nigeria or any

Nigerians.

OITC does not lend money, it is an investor. It takes no fees, NO FEES at ALL. PER SE it

cannot be an advance fee scam, and it does not provide credits as alleged. Waffelknocker

provided proper sources. If you want a letter from OITC's lawyer, one can be arranged.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_globalbanking96.htm


10/13

Since I cannot comment directly to the discussion re deleting this article, I hope that my

additions to this talk reply are read and incorporated into the discussion.

Also posted by Chapter 10 on 4/18/06:

To counteract your repetitive old post, I will also refer partially to the same tactic

by reposting the US Treasury Letter and (something NEW) a retype of the US

Treasury Letter.

(US Treasury Letter)

http://i44.photobucket.com/albums/f43/ChariotofFire/c86d417a.jpg

(Retype of US Treasury Letter)
http://i44.photobucket.com/albums/f43/ChariotofFire/c86d417a.jpghttp://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_sociopol/globalbanking167_02.jpg


11/13

http://i44.photobucket.com/albums/f43/ChariotofFire/Retype-USTReasuryDocument.j pg

As the original Munk letter is partly illegible I have retyped same so that it is legible.

I can state that Russell L. Munkhas now been verified as the General Counsel, International

Department, US Treasury, Washington D.C. 20220, USA, at the date of the letter. Mr Munk,

from what I am informed is no longer with that department, having been moved to head the

department responsible for assisting Iraq is re-establishing their Treasury and Central Bank. Infact it wasn't long ago that he was actually in Iraq.

I can also state that this letter has been verified as being issued by Russell L. Munk,

International Division, US Treasury, Washington DC, 20220, USA.A further letter has now been delivered to the US Treasury, Senior Counsel US Treasury, Mr

Arnold I. Havens. This letter (following verification of the Munk letter) details specific pertinent

questions more elaborate that the answers contained in Munk's letter. It will be posted when a

response is received.

I can also state that a Police Authority (and not from some two bit Banana Republic) hasundertaken enquiries on both Ray C. Damand Keith Scottand have established that these

persons are not crooks, convicts, gangsters, criminals or similar.

Your comments are too long to be incorporated into the discussion, but I've noted on the

discussion that you've made further arguments. --Sam Blanning(talk) 08:47, 27 April 2006

(UTC)

OITC invests, it does not take anyone's money or property. Since it does not seek money it is

per se not a scam of any financial type .It scams no party. Either it delivers assets or funds or

it does not. The argument that it is a scam is illogical. Who is it harming? What is presented

by claimants is gossip, speculation and ignorance. No credible evidence of criminal behavior
http://i44.photobucket.com/albums/f43/ChariotofFire/Retype-USTReasuryDocument.jpghttp://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_sociopol/globalbanking167_01.jpg


12/13

has ever been presented.It is interesting that when an institution offers to do good and help people with concrete assets

of independent valuation and verification that parties smear it. Waffelknocker provided

information that valuable assets were delivered and verified by reputable financial institutions.

Quoting old news stories speculation about OITC when actual assets have been delivered and

verified subsequent to the news stories is intentionally misleading. OITC has in fact provided

two addresses to the Fiji Government, according to its lawyer. Waffelknocker has provided an

address as well.

I address this to khaosworks. If you have the proper security clearance and access, the

President of China is quite knowledgeable about OITC.

How do I provide the administrators an 11 page history, and how do I make sure that it cannot

be edited by someone else. The file is a modification locked word file, but I cannot upload it.

RESPONSE TO DISINFORMATIONOITC is not, and never asserted, that it is part of the Federal Reserve. OITC is Chartered by the

UN, it is legally considered an independent, sovereign jurisdiction.The Federal Reserve has accounts for sovereign jurisdictions. No bank may respond to an

inquiry about an account holder without permission of the account holder.

HISTORYAppointed January 20, 1995 by the Governments of the World to Act as Sole Arbiter, Owner

and Controller of The International Collateral Combined Accounts of the Global Debt Facility.

The File of H.E. Dr. Ray C. Damis Secured by U.S. Congress under 3rd Level to the 5th Level

Rules, with Appointment and Protective reaffirmed by the United States Senate. His

Excellency Dr. Ray C. Dam is an International Protected Person.

Elected by those qualified to elect under the existing International Agreements in accordance

with the Articles of the Bank for International Settlements (January 20, 1930), on January 20,

1995, Dr. Dam was elected and appointed by the International Community as the Sole Arbiter

of all those assets that form the Collateral of International Combined in conformance to that

agreed and assented to by the forefathers of that community of nations whose Central Banks

are connected to (or were at that time connected to) The Bank for International Settlements.

These include such agreements as The Tripartite Trilateral Trillenium Pact (a Pact between the

Kingdoms and Colonial Powers of the World, London 1921) and subsequent international

agreements and revisions thereof including and not limited to,

The Bretton Woods Agreement (New Hampshire 1944)

The B.I.S. Agreement with the Allies (Bern 1948)

The Green Hilton Agreement (Geneva, 1963)

The Schweitzer Convention (Innsbruck, 1968)

The Amendments to the Foreign Gold Act (Washington, 1972)

That the rights and authorities of His Excellency, Dr. Ray C. Dam are ABSOLUTE and

UNLIMITED and entered in the records of the United Nations and all major Financial

Institutions and Law Enforcement Agencies under International Control No. 10-60847 and the

registration with the Combined Banks Holding the assets of Account, such record held within,
http://www.unoitc.org/History.html


13/13

The Federal Reserve System

The Department of the Treasury of the United States of America

The Swiss Federal Finance Administration

The Swiss National Bank and certain commercial banks

All such accounts of the International Collateral Combined are under the Sole and Arbitrary

right of control that was ceded to His Excellency Dr. Ray C. Dam on January 20, 1995 by the

International Community and exercised through Consolidated Credit Bank Limited (THIS IS

NOT ASSOCIATED WITH A NIGERIAN SCAM THAT WAS RUN OUT OF LONDON AND

STOPPED).Under these authorities, no decision of the Federal Reserve or the Department of the Treasury

of the United States or Freddie Mac or of any Holder may usurp the institutional authority of

the Sole Arbiter and Owner.The right of His Excellency, Dr. Ray C. Dam is established under an Agreement between

Nations with security codes registered with the United Nations and all major government

security and law enforcement agencies.

More HistorySee "Brief Historical Perspective" - from 'The History of The Pow ers And Authorities - Of His Excellency Dr.Ray C. Dam'

Return to The Global Banking

System

Return to Gold for Humans and

Others...
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_gold.htm#Additional_Informationhttp://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_globalbanking.htm#The_Covert_Banking_Systemhttp://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_globalbanking96.htm#BRIEF_HISTORICAL_PERSPECTIVE

the green hilton agreement - geneva 1963

Documents